The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 328:15-20 January 7, 1993 Number 1
NextNext

Comparison of Low-Dose Isotretinoin with Beta Carotene to Prevent Oral Carcinogenesis
Scott M. Lippman, John G. Batsakis, Bela B. Toth, Randal S. Weber, J. Jack Lee, Jack W. Martin, Granvil L. Hays, Helmuth Goepfert, and Waun Ki Hong

 

This Article
-Abstract

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background High-dose isotretinoin therapy has been determined to be an effective treatment for leukoplakia. However, a high rate of relapses and toxic reactions led us to conduct a trial of a much lower dose of isotretinoin in the hope of maintaining a response and limiting toxicity.

Methods In the first phase of the study, 70 patients with leukoplakia underwent induction therapy with a high dose of isotretinoin (1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) for three months; in the second phase, patients with responses or stable lesions were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with either beta carotene (30 mg per day) or a low dose of isotretinoin (0.5 mg per kilogram per day) for nine months.

Results In the first phase, the rate of response to high-dose induction therapy in the 66 patients who could be evaluated was 55 percent (36 patients). The lesions of seven patients progressed, and therefore they did not participate in the second phase of the trial. Of the 59 patients included in the second phase, 33 were assigned to beta carotene therapy and 26 to low-dose isotretinoin therapy; these two groups did not differ significantly in prognostic factors. Of the 53 patients who could be evaluated, 22 in the low-dose isotretinoin group and 13 in the beta carotene group responded to maintenance therapy or continued to have stable lesions (92 percent vs. 45 percent, P<0.001). In situ carcinoma developed in one patient in each group, and invasive squamous-cell carcinoma in five patients in the beta carotene group. Toxicity was generally mild, though greater in the group given low-dose isotretinoin therapy.

Conclusions When preceded by high-dose induction therapy, low-dose isotretinoin therapy was significantly more active against leukoplakia than beta carotene and was easily tolerated.


Leukoplakia is a premalignant lesion of the epithelium of the oral cavity; it is related to and can become oral cancer1,2. This lesion is closely linked etiologically to tobacco use, and its natural history is variable. The rate of transformation of leukoplakia into invasive cancer is directly related to the degree of histologic abnormality. In the largest and longest study in the United States (mean follow-up, 7.2 years), the long-term transformation rate for dysplastic lesions was 36 percent3. Studies from other countries have found lower rates for the transformation of dysplasia into cancer (11 to 14 percent); however, these studies were shorter and suffered from the fact that transformation appears to occur at a constant rate per year2. Leukoplakia can indicate the presence of field carcinogenesis or exposure to carcinogenic agents (primarily tobacco) throughout the entire length of the aerodigestive tract4,5.

The standard therapy for local dysplastic leukoplakic lesions is surgical removal or laser ablation2,6. Standard local therapy is not feasible, however, when there are extensive multiple lesions, nor is it capable of reducing the risk of cancer associated with diffuse exposure to carcinogens throughout the aerodigestive tract.

There are strong clinical and investigational reasons for studying the use of systemic agents for leukoplakia. The high risk of transformation of dysplastic leukoplakia and the number of patients at high risk who are not helped by surgery provide the clinical basis for a trial of a chemopreventive approach7,8. The broader rationale for this investigation rests on the relation of leukoplakia through field carcinogenesis to other tobacco-related epithelial cancers of the aerodigestive tract4,5,6,8. Excellent preclinical models are available for studying oral carcinogenesis and intervention in this process8,9. Located in the oral cavity, leukoplakia can be monitored easily and relatively noninvasively. It therefore serves as an ideal in vivo human model for testing the potential of chemopreventive agents throughout this region.

In 1986 a trial of isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) given in a high dose for leukoplakia established the activity of this drug10. The wider clinical value of leukoplakia as a model was confirmed by a subsequent adjuvant trial of high-dose isotretinoin therapy, which established this agent's substantial activity in preventing second primary tumors associated with head-and-neck cancer,11 tumors that are causally and biologically related to leukoplakia4,5,6,8.

The short-term (three month) trial reported in 1986 had two major problems: a relapse rate of more than 50 percent within two to three months after the end of therapy, and a level of toxicity that was unacceptably high for general clinical use in chemoprevention10.

The present, longer trial (12 months) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxic effects of a low dose of isotretinoin in maintaining the remission of oral precancer or halting its progression. The trial was conducted in two phases: a three-month induction phase in which patients took a high dose of isotretinoin, followed by a nine-month maintenance phase in which patients with responses or stable lesions were randomly assigned either to treatment with a low dose of isotretinoin or to treatment with beta carotene.

The use of the retinoid isotretinoin is based on extensive data demonstrating the anticarcinogenic activity of retinoids in humans5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,15. Retinoids have reversed premalignant epithelial lesions5,6,7,8,10,12,14,15,16 and have helped to prevent second primary cancers of the skin17 and the head and neck8,11,15. The natural agent beta carotene was chosen as the comparison drug for the maintenance phase because of its established lack of toxicity, epidemiologic data suggesting it has a role in preventing squamous-cell carcinoma of the aerodigestive tract, and its variable activity against leukoplakia in several uncontrolled clinical trials6,8,18,19,20.

The final results of this randomized chemoprevention trial are presented in this report.

Methods

Criteria for Eligibility

The three major criteria for inclusion were the presence of oral lesions that were histologically confirmed as premalignant and could be measured in two dimensions, normal renal and hepatic function, and acceptable fasting triglyceride levels at entry (levels <2.5 times the upper limit of normal). We primarily sought to include patients with dysplastic lesions, although patients with extensive, symptomatic hyperplastic oral lesions also were eligible. The three major criteria for exclusion were the possibility of pregnancy, a current intake of large doses of vitamin A (>25,000 USP units per day) or beta carotene, and a history of oral cancer within the two years before the study. Physical examination and appropriate laboratory studies were performed before treatment was started.

The nature and purpose of the study were fully discussed with each patient. The study protocol was approved by our institutional review board for human research, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Study Design

This study had two phases. In the first phase, all patients underwent induction therapy with a high dose of isotretinoin (1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) for three months. Patients whose lesions progressed during this period were withdrawn from the study. In the second phase, patients whose lesions responded to treatment or remained stable were stratified according to the histologic type of their lesions and the nature of their response to induction therapy; they were then randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with either a low dose of isotretinoin (0.5 mg per kilogram per day) or beta carotene (30 mg per day) for nine months. The four strata were dysplasia, with a response; dysplasia, with no response; hyperplasia, with a response; and hyperplasia, with no response. Computer randomization (conducted by the Data Management Office of the Division of Medicine) grouped patients in blocks of six within each stratum before they were assigned to maintenance therapy. Patients whose lesions progressed at any time were withdrawn from the study.

Patients were evaluated for toxic reactions every four weeks during both study phases. The criteria for grading toxicity were based on the standards of the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,21 which include the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute and others22. Grade 1 toxicity was mild (e.g., cheilitis easily controlled with emollients); grade 2, moderate and tolerable (e.g., pruritus causing discomfort or generalized mild dermatitis); grade 3, severe and intolerable (e.g., conjunctivitis poorly controlled with artificial tears); and grade 4, most severe and life-threatening (e.g., generalized exfoliative dermatitis with or without systemic infection).

Every four weeks, physical examinations and standard laboratory studies were performed, and compliance with treatment was assessed by a review of daily calendars kept by the patients. If the examiner suspected that the lesions had progressed, the patient was referred to a dental oncologist for formal measurements.

The dose of isotretinoin (whether for induction or maintenance) was reduced substantially if toxicity of grade 2 or greater developed; the dose of beta carotene was not modified. Both drugs were provided in capsules (Hoffmann-LaRoche, Nutley, N.J.) and were taken orally.

Assessment of Response

The outcome of treatment was assessed both clinically and histologically by investigators other than the medical oncologist who evaluated toxicity. A dental oncologist evaluated the measurements and color photographs of the lesions in a blinded fashion to categorize objective clinical responses. These evaluations were carried out at entry and in the 3rd and 12th (last) months of the study. Two-dimensional measurements, color photographs, and biopsy specimens were also obtained whenever a patient had clinical evidence of disease progression and left the study.

An objective response was considered complete when gross inspection revealed no evidence of a lesion, and it was considered partial when the size of a lesion or of the sum of the measurements of all lesions decreased by at least 50 percent. Lesions were considered stable when their sizes increased by less than 25 percent or decreased by less than 50 percent. Disease progression was defined as an increase of at least 25 percent in the sum of the measurements of all lesions during treatment or as the appearance of any new lesion.

Histologic evaluations were performed at entry, after induction therapy, and at the completion of the study. All slides were coded and interpreted in a blinded fashion by one pathologist, who used strict histologic criteria to grade dysplasia as mild, moderate, or severe10. A random selection of 20 percent of graded tissue specimens was reviewed by a second pathologist to confirm the consistency of the grading by the primary pathologist.

Statistical Analysis

The main statistical objective of this study was to compare the rates of treatment failure in the two treatment groups assigned to maintenance therapy. Failure rates were calculated after the completion of induction and maintenance therapy. We planned to enroll 60 patients so that if any patients were lost because of disease progression or withdrawal, each treatment group would contain 25 patients who could be evaluated. This would allow the rate of treatment failure to be estimated with a standard error no greater than 10 percent.

Two-sample t-tests were used for analyses of continuous variables, such as age. Two-way contingency tables were formed and analyzed by the Pearson chi-square test for categorical variables, such as disease progression and toxicity rates23. All P values are two-sided.

Results

Characteristics of the Patients

A total of 70 patients entered the study. Their important characteristics and the histologic types of their leukoplakia are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the maintenance-therapy groups in their major prognostic features at base line. Most patients were at high risk, as indicated by the high percentage with dysplasia in each treatment group.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Major Characteristics of the Patients.

 
Induction Phase

Sixty-six of the 70 enrolled patients could be evaluated for their responses to induction therapy (a high dose of isotretinoin for three months); 3 of the other 4 patients could not be evaluated because of noncompliance, and 1 because of toxicity-related withdrawal. The percentage of patients with complete or partial clinical responses was 55 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 42 to 67), and the percentage with stable disease was 35 percent. The degree of histologic dysplasia was reduced in 43 percent (18 of 42) of the patients with dysplasia who could be evaluated. Disease progression occurred in seven patients during the induction phase, and they were withdrawn from the study immediately.

Induction therapy produced substantial toxic reactions. Sixty-eight patients completed at least one month of therapy and could therefore be evaluated for toxic reactions (Table 2). All of them had at least low-grade toxic reactions, and many had two or more reactions. Thirteen patients had no more than grade 2 reactions; 23 had grade 3 or 4 reactions, including 1 patient who was withdrawn because of intolerable gastrointestinal effects. No major liver toxicity occurred. Transient elevations of alkaline phosphatase levels indicating toxicity occurred in seven patients, and elevations of aminotransferase levels occurred in four patients.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Toxic Effects of High-Dose Isotretinoin Induction Therapy.

 
Maintenance Phase

Eleven of the 70 patients enrolled were withdrawn during the induction phase (7 patients for disease progression, 3 for noncompliance, and 1 for toxicity). Fifty-nine patients who had responses or stable lesions by the end of induction therapy were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with beta carotene (33 patients) or a low dose of isotretinoin (26 patients). Six patients (four taking beta carotene and two taking isotretinoin) could not be evaluated. One patient dropped out immediately after being assigned to beta carotene, and five dropped out later for reasons other than toxicity or disease progression. Fifty-three patients (29 taking beta carotene and 24 taking isotretinoin) could be fully evaluated.

Because of an early error in dispensing by the pharmacy, subsequently corrected, the first 10 patients taking beta carotene received half the planned dose (15 instead of 30 mg per day) and 5 others received half the planned dose (15 mg) initially and the full dose (30 mg) for three to eight months. The remaining 14 patients taking beta carotene received the full dose throughout the maintenance phase.

The clinical results of maintenance therapy are shown in Table 3. The rate of disease progression in the group taking a low dose of isotretinoin was significantly lower than the rate in the group taking beta carotene (8 percent vs. 55 percent, P<0.001). Conversely, the rate of further responses to maintenance therapy was higher in the isotretinoin group than in the beta carotene group (33 percent vs. 10 percent). Relapse (disease progression) occurred early in 8 of the 16 patients who were taking beta carotene (in 4 patients after three months of maintenance therapy, in 3 after five months, and in 1 after six months). Relapse also occurred in two patients who were taking isotretinoin, but it was not detected before the final evaluation (at nine months).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Final Clinical Results of Maintenance Therapy.

 
Within 28 months after maintenance therapy began, in situ cancer developed in two patients, one in each treatment group, and invasive squamous-cell carcinoma developed in five patients in the beta carotene group. All seven patients underwent curative wide excision.

The outcomes of maintenance and induction therapy were not correlated. Whether a response occurred or lesions remained stable after induction therapy had little effect on the outcome of maintenance therapy (Table 4).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Rates of Disease Progression in the Maintenance Groups, According to the Outcome of the Induction Phase.

 
The results of maintenance therapy were not affected by tobacco use -- that is, the rate of disease progression among patients taking beta carotene who did not use tobacco was similar to the rate among those who did. Tobacco use was recorded at entry; during the study, no active tobacco users quit completely and no nonusers started.

Final biopsies provided histologic results that could be compared with the final clinical results. In 23 (44 percent) of the 52 patients who could be evaluated histologically (1 patient refused a final biopsy) -- 4 with responses, 14 with stable lesions, and 5 with disease progression -- the histologic and clinical results were the same. The largest discrepancy occurred in 10 patients who were shown clinically to have disease progression but shown histologically to have stable lesions. Also, six patients with clinical responses had histologically stable disease.

The consistency of histologic grading was confirmed. By simple random sampling without replacement, a computer selected 12 patients, 6 from each maintenance-phase group, whose biopsy specimens were to be reviewed by a second pathologist not involved in the study and blinded to the interpretations of the first pathologist. These 12 patients had at least three sequential biopsies (at base line, after induction, and after maintenance), and 1 patient (at high risk) had five sequential biopsies. A total of 38 specimens were reviewed. The second and primary pathologists agreed about 35 specimens (92 percent) and disagreed about 3 specimens, which the first pathologist interpreted as showing hyperplasia and the second pathologist interpreted as showing focal mild dysplasia.

Compliance during the maintenance phase was excellent; all evaluated patients took at least 80 percent of the planned doses, and 62 percent (33 of 53) took at least 90 percent.

Maintenance-phase toxicity was relatively mild (Table 5). Fifty-eight patients who completed at least one month of maintenance therapy were included in the toxicity analysis (26 taking isotretinoin and 32 taking beta carotene). One patient who dropped out of the study immediately after random assignment to beta carotene was excluded. With respect to mucocutaneous toxicity, there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in the rate of high-grade reactions (grade 3 or 4); there were significant differences favoring the beta carotene group in the rate of low-grade reactions (grade 1 or 2). Hypertriglyceridemia of grade 3 or 4 was more frequent in the isotretinoin group (P = 0.05). As in the induction phase, there were no major liver abnormalities. Reversible aminotransferase elevations occurred in two patients taking isotretinoin. Mild and reversible skin yellowing occurred in nine patients, all of whom were taking beta carotene.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Toxic Effects of Maintenance Therapy.

 
Of the 10 patients with grade 3 or 4 toxicity during induction therapy who were assigned to maintenance therapy with isotretinoin, 2 also had grade 3 or 4 reactions (although reactions of different types) during the maintenance phase and 8 had grade 1 or 2 reactions. Therefore, the occurrence of high-grade toxicity during induction therapy did not predict the occurrence of such toxicity during low-dose maintenance therapy. Many patients with low-grade reactions (grade 1 or 2) during induction therapy with isotretinoin had similar low-grade reactions during maintenance therapy, indicating that the levels of toxicity did not escalate during the longer-term, low-dose phase.

Discussion

In 1986 high-dose isotretinoin therapy was shown to be highly effective against leukoplakia, but the toxicity of that regimen was high, and over 50 percent of patients with responses relapsed within two to three months after therapy was stopped10. In the present study, the primary goal was to maintain or improve responses or to prevent the progression of leukoplakia with a low dose of isotretinoin at an acceptable level of toxicity. The maintenance dose of isotretinoin -- 0.5 mg per kilogram per day, which is only one third of the established high dose -- is the lowest systemic dose of this agent ever studied in clinical trials of leukoplakia.

In the induction phase, the 55 percent response rate for high-dose isotretinoin therapy was consistent with the established response rate of 67 percent10. In the maintenance phase, 92 percent of the patients assigned to low-dose isotretinoin therapy (22 of 24) continued to respond or improved further (Table 3). The results of the maintenance phase were not affected by the outcome of the high-dose isotretinoin induction therapy (Table 4). The toxicity of isotretinoin was clearly dose-related. The rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity decreased from 34 percent during induction with a high dose of isotretinoin to only 12 percent during maintenance with a low dose of isotretinoin. The analyses of efficacy and toxicity during the maintenance phase indicate that a low dose of isotretinoin has a high therapeutic index for maintaining response (and preventing disease progression) in patients with oral premalignant lesions.

The overall rate of disease progression of 55 percent in the group taking beta carotene for maintenance was significantly higher than the rate of 8 percent in the group taking isotretinoin (P<0.001) (Table 3). These results do not show that beta carotene is effective as a maintenance agent in leukoplakia. Our study may have been biased in favor of isotretinoin because most patients selected for maintenance therapy were those shown to be sensitive to retinoids during induction therapy. Such a bias was unavoidable in a trial designed primarily to prolong the established short-term response to high-dose isotretinoin treatment.

This trial used histologic assessments because of the potentially crucial role of histology in chemoprevention trials24. Strict measures were used to ensure the reliability of the evaluation of tissue specimens. The findings of a single primary pathologist with extensive experience in head-and-neck cancer25,26 were verified by random review by a second pathologist.

Discrepancies between histologic and clinical assessments occurred, primarily in patients whose lesions were stable histologically but had changed clinically. Such discrepancies may result more from differences in methods than from qualitative differences in disease states -- for example, a reduction in a lesion by 50 percent represented a clinical partial response although a biopsy of the remaining visible lesion (i.e., not in an area of tissue appearing grossly normal after a clinical response) might reveal no histologic change.

The role of tobacco in carcinogenesis in aerodigestive tract epithelia is beyond dispute6,27. The impact of tobacco on the subsequent natural history of leukoplakia or the development of a second primary tumor (the leading cause of death, after early head-and-neck cancer28,29,30) is less clear2,3,5,8,11. Our previous studies10,11 and our present trial found no significant effect of smoking or its cessation on the end points of oral premalignant lesions or second primary tumors.

Recent data suggest that the biologic effects of retinoids are mediated by retinoic acid nuclear receptors. The sequencing of these receptors in the DNA-binding region indicates that they are members of the steroid-receptor superfamily31,32,33,34. It is known that isotretinoin can easily be isomerized to all-trans-retinoic acid, which is the known ligand for retinoic acid nuclear receptors. On the other hand, beta carotene is far removed from and not easily metabolized into all-trans-retinoic acid. This difference between the two agents may contribute to differences in their chemopreventive activity. Recent data suggest that retinoic acid receptors mediate the biologic effects of retinoids, specifically in human oral leukoplakia35.

Supported by a Public Health Service grant (CA-46303) from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Lippman is the recipient of a Clinical Oncology Career Development Award from the American Cancer Society.

We are indebted to Dr. Adel El-Naggar for his histologic review; to Becky Gossett, Rosanne Trost, and Karen McCarthy for their clinical assistance; to Charles Earley for technical assistance; and to Stephanie Johnson and Sarita Jackson for their assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.


Source Information

From the Departments of Medical Oncology (S.M.L., W.K.H.), Pathology (J.G.B.), Dental Oncology (B.B.T., J.W.M.), Head and Neck Surgery (R.S.W., H.G.), and Biomathematics (J.J.L.), University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; and the Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center Dental Branch (G.L.H.) -- both in Houston.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Lippman at the Department of Medical Oncology, Box 80, University of Texas M.D., anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030.

References

  1. Kramer IR, Lucas RB, Pindborg JJ, Sobin LH. Definition of leukoplakia and related lesions: an aid to studies on oral precancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;46:518-539. [Medline]
  2. Silverman S Jr, ed. Oral cancer. 3rd ed. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1990.
  3. Silverman S Jr, Gorsky M, Lozada F. Oral leukoplakia and malignant transformation: a follow-up study of 257 patients. Cancer 1984;53:563-568. [CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Slaughter DP, Southwick HW, Smejkal W. Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium: clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer 1953;6:963-968. [CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Lippman SM, Hong WK. Second malignant tumors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the overshadowing threat for patients with early-stage disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:691-694. [Medline]
  6. Wolf G, Lippman SM, Laramore G, Hong WK. Head and neck cancer. In: Holland JF, Frei E, Bast RC Jr, Kufe DW, Morton DL, Weichselbaum R, eds. Cancer medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1992:1211-74.
  7. Sporn MB. Approaches to prevention of epithelial cancer during the preneoplastic period. Cancer Res 1976;36:2699-2702. [Free Full Text]
  8. Lippman SM, Hong WK. Retinoid chemoprevention of upper aerodigestive tract carcinogenesis. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Important advances in oncology 1992. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1992:93-109.
  9. Shin DM, Gimenez IB, Lee JS, et al. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, polyamine levels, ornithine decarboxylase activity, micronuclei, and transglutaminase I in a 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis model. Cancer Res 1990;50:2505-2510. [Free Full Text]
  10. Hong WK, Endicott J, Itri LM, et al. 13-cis-Retinoic acid in the treatment of oral leukoplakia. N Engl J Med 1986;315:1501-1505. [Abstract]
  11. Hong WK, Lippman SM, Itri LM, et al. Prevention of second primary tumors with isotretinoin in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 1990;323:795-801. [Abstract]
  12. Sporn MB, Dunlop NM, Newton DL, Smith JM. Prevention of chemical carcinogenesis by vitamin A and its synthetic analogs (retinoids). Fed Proc 1976;35:1332-1338. [Medline]
  13. Lotan R. Effects of vitamin A and its analogs (retinoids) on normal and neoplastic cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1980;605:33-91. [Medline]
  14. Bollag W. Vitamin A and retinoids: from nutrition to pharmacotherapy in dermatology and oncology. Lancet 1983;1:860-863. [Medline]
  15. Lippman SM, Kessler JF, Meyskens FL Jr. Retinoids as preventive and therapeutic anticancer agents. Cancer Treat Rep 1987;71:391-405, 493. [Medline]
  16. Band PR, Feldstein M, Saccomanno G. Reversibility of bronchial marked atypia: implication for chemoprevention. Cancer Detect Prev 1986;9:157-160. [Medline]
  17. Kraemer KH, DiGiovanna JJ, Moshell AN, Tarone RE, Peck GL. Prevention of skin cancer in xeroderma pigmentosum with the use of oral isotretinoin. N Engl J Med 1988;318:1633-1637. [Abstract]
  18. Peto R, Doll R, Buckley JD, Sporn MB. Can dietary beta-carotene materially reduce human cancer rates? Nature 1981;290:201-208. [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Winn DM, Ziegler RG, Pickle LW, Gridley G, Blot WJ, Hoover RN. Diet in the etiology of oral and pharyngeal cancer among women from the southern United States. Cancer Res 1984;44:1216-1222. [Free Full Text]
  20. Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Stukel TA, et al. A clinical trial of beta carotene to prevent basal-cell and squamous-cell cancers of the skin. N Engl J Med 1990;323:789-795. [Abstract]
  21. Ajani JA, Welch SR, Raber MN, Fields WS, Krakoff IH. Comprehensive criteria for assessing therapy-induced toxicity. Cancer Invest 1990;8:147-159. [Medline]
  22. Meyskens FL Jr, Goodman GE, Alberts DS. 13-Cis-retinoic acid: pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical applications for the prevention and treatment of human cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1985;3:75-101. [Medline]
  23. Woolson RF. Statistical methods for the analysis of biomedical data. New York: John Wiley, 1987.
  24. Lippman SM, Lee JS, Lotan R, Hittelman W, Wargovich MJ, Hong WK. Biomarkers as intermediate end points in chemoprevention trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:555-560. [Free Full Text]
  25. Batsakis JG, ed. Tumors of the head and neck: clinical and pathological considerations. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1979.
  26. Hyams VJ, Batsakis JG, Michaels L, eds. Tumors of the upper respiratory tract and ear. Atlas of tumor pathology. 2nd series. Fascicle 25. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1988.
  27. Decker J, Goldstein JC. Current concepts in otolaryngology: risk factors in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1151-1155. [Medline]
  28. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Rubin P, et al. Second malignancies in patients who have head and neck cancer: incidence, effect on survival and implications based on the RTOG experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:449-456. [Medline]
  29. Tepperman BS, Fitzpatrick PJ. Second respiratory and upper digestive tract cancers after oral cancer. Lancet 1981;2:547-549. [CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Vikram B. Changing patterns of failure in advanced head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:564-565. [Free Full Text]
  31. Evans RM. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 1988;240:889-895. [Free Full Text]
  32. Gudas LJ. Molecular mechanisms of retinoid action. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1990;2:319-320.
  33. Lotan R, Clifford JL. Nuclear receptors for retinoids: mediators of retinoid effects on normal and malignant cells. Biomed Pharmacother 1991;45:145-156. [CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Smith MA, Parkinson DR, Cheson BD, Friedman MA. Retinoids in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:839-864. [Free Full Text]
  35. Hu L, Crowe DL, Rheinwald JG, Chambon P, Gudas LJ. Abnormal expression of retinoic acid receptors and keratin 19 by human oral and epidermal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res 1991;51:3972-3981. [Free Full Text]

 

This Article
-Abstract

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.