The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 328:65-66 January 7, 1993 Number 1
NextNext

The Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The article by Riggs and Melton on the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (Aug. 27 issue)1 is likely to become a much cited reference. Therefore, the error in the legend for their Figure 2 is important. Figure 2 is said to show scanning electron micrographs of cancellous bone from a normal young woman and a postmenopausal woman with osteoporosis. These micrographs, reprinted from an article by Dempster et al.,2 actually show bone from a normal man and a 47-year-old woman with osteoporosis whose reproductive status was not described.

The authors did not mention the potential role of progesterone in bone formation. Evidence that progesterone acts as a bone trophic hormone3 has recently been extended by in vitro work documenting the presence of progesterone receptors on osteoblasts. Progesterone may be found to have a particularly important role if one examines the one half to two thirds of bone loss that Riggs and Melton acknowledge is not "attributable to the menopause"1.


Jerilynn C. Prior, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada


John D. Wark, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., F.R.A.C.P.
University of Melbourne
Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia


Susan I. Barr, Ph.D.
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada

References

  1. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1992;327:620-627. [Medline]
  2. Dempster DW, Shane E, Horbert W, Lindsay R. A simple method for correlative light and scanning electron microscopy of human iliac crest bone biopsies: qualitative observations in normal and osteoporotic subjects. J Bone Miner Res 1986;1:15-21. [Medline]
  3. Prior JC. Progesterone as a bone-trophic hormone. Endocr Rev 1990;11:386-398. [Free Full Text]

 
To the Editor: Riggs and Melton offer a comprehensive review of the drugs used in patients with osteoporosis, but one of their recommendations is not consistent with the discussion preceding it. They state that "Calcitonin . . . is an acceptable substitute in women who are unwilling to take estrogen or are prone to complications of estrogen therapy," after having stated that we do not yet know whether calcitonin is effective in preventing fractures but that it "may not reduce cortical bone loss."

The authors also do not seem to realize that long-term estrogen therapy is difficult for both doctors and their patients to accept, as has been confirmed by the very high degree of noncompliance with long-term estrogen therapy. For example, in a recent study, 40 percent of women stopped taking the medication eight months after beginning therapy.1


Daniele Coen, M.D.
Emanuela Terzian, M.D.
Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri"
20157 Milan, Italy


Nicola Magrini, M.D.
University of Bologna
40126 Bologna, Italy

References

  1. Ryan PJ, Harrison R, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Compliance with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after screening for post menopausal osteoporosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:325-328. [Medline]

 
The authors reply:

To the Editor: Prior and colleagues are correct that the scanning electron micrograph of cancellous bone in Figure 2A, reproduced from the paper by Dempster et al., in fact showed bone from a normal 44-year-old man, not bone from a normal premenopausal woman as we stated. We appreciate their calling this error to our attention. The figure was intended to demonstrate the effect of excessive osteoclastic resorption on cancellous bone. This point is made equally well by comparing the micrograph of the woman with osteoporosis with that of the normal man.

Prior et al. have developed the interesting hypothesis that postmenopausal bone loss is caused by a deficiency of both estrogen and progesterone and that some bone loss in premenopausal women may be caused by progesterone deficiency associated with anovulatory menstrual cycles. Because of space constraints, we limited our review largely to studies in which the effectiveness of a drug in the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis had been demonstrated by randomized, controlled clinical trials using changes in bone density or fracture rates as end points. Studies of the effects of progestins on bone that will serve as an important test of this hypothesis should soon be forthcoming.

Coen and colleagues question the value of calcitonin treatment and remind the reader that many postmenopausal women are unwilling to take estrogen. Despite certain disadvantages, we believe that calcitonin is a useful antiresorptive drug. In a two-year controlled study in elderly women with moderate osteoporosis, Overgaard et al.1 found that treatment with intranasal salmon calcitonin significantly reduced the rates of vertebral and peripheral fractures. Acceptance of estrogen-replacement therapy can be improved by careful discussion with the patient of the well-documented, favorable ratio of benefits to risks2. Moreover, Rubin and Cummings3 have shown that the results of bone densitometry substantially influence a woman's decision about beginning such therapy. Our own unpublished data on random samples of women living in Rochester, Minnesota, show that the proportion receiving replacement estrogen within 20 years after menopause increased from 4 percent in 1980 to 33 percent in 1992. Thus, acceptance of estrogen-replacement therapy appears to be increasing.


B. Lawrence Riggs, M.D.
L. Joseph Melton, III, M.D.
Mayo Clinic and Foundation
Rochester, MN 55905

References

  1. Overgaard K, Hansen MA, Jensen SB, Christiansen C. Effect of salcatonin given intranasally on bone mass and fracture rates in established osteoporosis: a dose-response study. BMJ 1992;305:556-561.
  2. Hillner BE, Hollenberg JP, Pauker SG. Postmenopausal estrogens in prevention of osteoporosis: benefit virtually without risk if cardiovascular effects are considered. Am J Med 1986;80:1115-1127. [CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Rubin SM, Cummings SR. Results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about taking measures to prevent fractures. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:990-995.

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.