The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Brief Report
PreviousPrevious
Volume 328:1605-1608 June 3, 1993 Number 22
NextNext

Stenting of the Ductus Arteriosus as a Bridge to Cardiac Transplantation in Infants with the Hypoplastic Left-Heart Syndrome
Carlos E. Ruiz, Habib Gamra, He Ping Zhang, Eulogio J. Garcia, and Mark M. Boucek

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
The hypoplastic left-heart syndrome is a complex congenital cardiac malformation1,2,3 that accounts for 7 to 8 percent of all cardiac lesions presenting in the first year of life; in addition, it is known to be the most common cause of death due to cardiac causes during the first week of life3,4,5. The prognosis has changed substantially since the development of the Norwood procedure in 19803,6,7,8,9,10,11 and the introduction of neonatal heart transplantation in 19853,12,13,14. When transplantation is considered, however, patency of the ductus arteriosus must be maintained until a suitable donor organ can be found. Although alprostadil (prostaglandin E) is effective in maintaining the patency of the ductus, its prolonged use can result in serious side effects and has practical limitations15,16,17. Therefore, an alternative method of maintaining ductal patency is needed.

In this report, we describe stenting of the ductus arteriosus to maintain its patency as a bridge procedure to heart transplantation in five infants with the hypoplastic left-heart syndrome. All the stenting procedures were successful and provided hemodynamic stability. Four of the five infants subsequently underwent successful orthotopic cardiac transplantation. The other infant had a cardiac arrest 24 hours after the procedure -- during placement of a subclavian catheter -- and died. This preliminary experience suggests that it may be possible to prolong the period of search for a donor heart for such critically ill infants.

Methods

This study, performed from April 1991 through March 1992, was carried out under the Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption after approval was obtained from the institutional review board of Loma Linda University Medical Center. Five patients with the hypoplastic left-heart syndrome were included. Informed consent was obtained from the parents in each case.

Hemodynamic instability with congestive heart failure despite high doses of alprostadil, dopamine, and dobutamine by infusion was observed in all five patients before placement of the stent. All the infants underwent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation during the procedure. Oral dipyridamole was started on the day of the procedure and continued thereafter. Prophylactic antibiotics were also given. Alprostadil was continued throughout the procedure and reduced to a low dose thereafter.

After a 6-French sheath (1 French unit = 0.33 mm) was placed in the femoral vein, heparin was given intravenously in a dose of 100 units per kilogram of body weight. A 5-French angiographic Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, Pa.) was then placed into the main pulmonary artery and from there into the ductus arteriosus, and angiograms were obtained in anteroposterior and lateral projections. The diameter of the ductus was measured with use of calibration grids. A 7-French multipurpose sheath (Cordis, Miami), 45 cm in length, was then introduced over a 0.89-mm (0.035 inch) guide wire previously placed across the ductus and into the descending aorta. A Palmaz-Schatz balloon-expandable articulated stent (Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems, Warren, N.J.) with a nominal unexpanded outside diameter of 2.5 mm and a length of 2 cm was mounted by hand on a 5-French Medi-tech PE-MT balloon-angioplasty catheter (Boston Scientific, Watertown, Mass.). With the sheath and wire held in place, the balloon catheter with the stent mounted around it was advanced and positioned in the stenotic ductus arteriosus. The sheath was then pulled back, the balloon was inflated, and the stent was deployed. Angiograms and pull-back pressure tracings across the ductus arteriosus were then obtained.

Results

The clinical data on the five infants are summarized in Table 1. Highlights of the individual cases are described below.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics and Outcomes of Five Infants with the Hypoplastic Left-Heart Syndrome Who Underwent Stenting of the Ductus Arteriosus.

 
Patient 1 was a baby girl who had undergone balloon atrial septal angioplasty at 34 days of age because of a restrictive atrial septal defect. (A widely patent atrial septal defect is needed in infants with the hypoplastic left-heart syndrome to permit blood returning from the pulmonary veins to reach the right side of the heart.) Uncontrolled congestive heart failure and severe acidosis recurred, indicating closure of the ductus arteriosus, which was documented by Doppler echocardiography. During the stenting procedure, a first attempt to position the stent into the ductus failed because the balloon ruptured. It was impossible to free the ruptured balloon from the stent, which was deliberately withdrawn and eventually positioned in the femoral vein, where it remains. A second stent was successfully deployed into the ductus arteriosus (Figure 1). Except for severe unsustained bradycardia during the deployment of the stent, no complications were encountered. The patient underwent a successful cardiac transplantation 15 days later. Histopathological examination of the ductus showed a fully deployed, patent, endothelialized stent with no clots.


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Anteroposterior View (Panel A) and Lateral View (Panel B) of the Stent Deployed into the Ductus Arteriosus in Patient 1, an 81-Day-Old Baby Girl.

The position of the stent is indicated by the arrow in each panel.

 
Patient 2 was a baby girl whose clinical condition deteriorated, with congestive heart failure and severe pulmonary hypertension documented by Doppler examination, after a relatively stable period. Echocardiography demonstrated narrowing of the ductus arteriosus in conjunction with a restrictive atrial septal defect. Ductal stenting and balloon atrial septostomy were performed. The procedures were uneventful, and cardiac transplantation was successfully accomplished 24 hours later. Histopathological study showed a fully deployed stent in the ductus.

Patient 3 was a baby boy in whom severe metabolic acidosis and hypotension developed shortly after birth. Clinical improvement followed the administration of dopamine, dobutamine, and alprostadil in conjunction with emergency atrial septal angioplasty. Hemodynamic instability with severe progressive metabolic acidosis recurred at 28 days, however, because of narrowing of the ductal lumen, documented by Doppler echocardiography. The stenting procedure was uneventful. Successful cardiac transplantation was accomplished 50 days later. Histopathological examination demonstrated a completely endothelialized stent in the ductus, with no clots.

Patient 4 was a baby boy in whom congestive heart failure with hemodynamic instability developed at 57 days of age. Narrowing of the ductal lumen was documented by Doppler echocardiography. Staphylococcus epidermidis sepsis was documented before the procedure. The stent was first deployed with an 8-mm balloon catheter; however, cineangiography demonstrated that the stent was mobile within the ductus. A 9-mm balloon catheter was then introduced in an attempt to anchor the stent correctly. The stent was fully expanded but was noted, after deflation of the balloon, to be still moving inside the ductus and protruding into the pulmonary artery. Despite further manipulations, we were unable to secure the stent adequately. In view of a final large ductal patency, we elected to terminate the procedure. The patient was returned to the neonatal intensive care unit in a stable condition. Twenty-four hours later, the patient had a cardiac arrest during placement of a right subclavian catheter. An autopsy revealed a large right hemothorax. The stent, which was found between the pulmonary artery and the ductus, was patent without evidence of thrombus. No perforation or tear was noted in the ductus or in the pulmonary artery.

Patient 5 was a baby girl who had tachypnea soon after birth. Because of a restrictive atrial septal defect, the patient underwent balloon atrial septostomy. During the same procedure, the ductus arteriosus was found to be constricted, with a diameter of only 4 mm. Ductal stenting was successful. Successful heart transplantation was performed eight days later. The stent, which was retrieved at that time, was patent without clots.

(Since this article was written, successful ductal stenting was performed in a sixth patient with the hypoplastic left-heart syndrome on October 16, 1992. This baby girl underwent successful cardiac transplantation 157 days after the stenting procedure. She was in stable condition at the most recent follow-up visit).

Discussion

A policy of conservative treatment of patients with the hypoplastic left-heart syndrome has been modified during the past decade after the development of improved palliative surgical procedures3,6,7,8,9,10,11 and the introduction of neonatal heart transplantation3,12,13,14. At Loma Linda University Medical Center, the focus has been on neonatal cardiac allotransplantation as an option in treating this complex cardiac anomaly.

Despite all efforts, about 20 percent of neonates registered for heart transplantation still die before a matched donor organ can be found14. Death is usually due to closing of the ductus arteriosus and the resultant decrease in systemic perfusion7. Alprostadil is effective in maintaining ductal patency in most patients, but its long-term use has practical limitations and there is a substantial incidence of side effects (e.g., fever, hypotension, hyperostosis, or increased fragility of the vascular tissue)15,16,17. Thus, the idea of maintaining ductal patency mechanically by a percutaneous approach is attractive, since it would obviate the need for palliative surgery and reduce the need for drugs and central venous access.

Stents have been shown to be a safe and effective nonsurgical method of treating vascular and biliary-duct stenosis18,19,20. Similarly, stenting of the ductus arteriosus has proved feasible in several studies that were conducted in animals21,22,23. We report evidence of the feasibility of this procedure in humans. Stenting was attempted in five patients and was technically successful in all of them. Successful orthotopic cardiac transplantation was subsequently performed in four of the patients 1, 8, 15, and 50 days after placement of the stent.

Despite the administration of alprostadil, dopamine, and dobutamine, all five patients were hemodynamically unstable before the procedure, and it is highly unlikely that any of these infants would have survived to heart transplantation without ductal stenting. Hemodynamic stability is of great importance in such patients because it allows time for better matching of the transplant recipient with a donor. In fact, on the basis of our experience, we believe that all patients with hypoplastic left-heart syndrome could eventually receive transplants if they remained hemodynamically stable. The waiting period for an appropriate donor is unpredictable, however, and can be lengthy. The delay raises the issue of balloon dilation alone, which may result in a satisfactory immediate result but carries the risk of early reclosure; redilation may also be limited by venous access. In a recent study Rosenthal et al.21 clearly demonstrated the superior hemodynamic and angiographic results achieved after ductal stenting as compared with balloon dilation alone.

During implantation, considerable care must be taken to avoid misplacement or migration of the stent. In fact, migration of the stent occurred in one of our patients (Patient 4), and we were unable to explain it adequately. Perhaps migration was related to hyporeactivity of the ductus, which failed to constrict around the stent to keep it in place. Such ductal hyporeactivity might have been due to balloon distention or possibly to the history of sepsis in this patient. When the ductus was examined at autopsy, there was no evidence of disruption of the media or rupture of the ductus.

Protrusion of the stent into the pulmonary artery or the descending aorta should also be prevented because there is a theoretical risk of thrombus formation and vessel injury. In addition, protrusion of the device into the aortic isthmus can compromise the blood flow to the great vessels. In none of these five patients was the stent placed distally into the descending aorta. Color Doppler assessment of the blood flow did not show any evidence of obstructed flow in the ascending or descending aorta. Furthermore, there was no gradient between the systolic pulmonary-artery pressure and the systolic blood pressure in the arm after the procedure or at follow-up in any of these patients.

Thrombosis in the stent did not seem to be a problem in this preliminary study. This fact is probably explained by the large diameter of the stented ductus and the resulting vigorous flow, which lessens the likelihood of clot formation inside the ductus. Also, endothelialization, which occurred sooner than expected (it occurred within 15 days after the stenting procedure in Patient 1) might have contributed to a diminished risk of late thrombosis.

Although alprostadil should no longer be necessary after the stenting procedure, it was deliberately maintained at a low dose in our first four patients, since we were in the early stage of this experimental study and in need of data before making the decision to stop alprostadil after stenting. In fact, we were able to discontinue alprostadil in our fifth patient 48 hours after the procedure with no clinical consequences.

Clinical indications for ductal stenting in patients with the hypoplastic left-heart syndrome will certainly be revised as we learn more about the procedure. On the basis of this preliminary study, however, we believe that this procedure should be considered for infants who have evidence of ductal stenosis despite the administration of alprostadil or who have serious side effects or are unresponsive to a high dose of this drug. In patients who require intervention for a restrictive atrial septal defect, even in the absence of clinically important narrowing of the ductus, ductal stenting might be performed at the same time, since subsequent access to the femoral vein may be limited.

In summary, the encouraging results of this pilot study document the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of stenting in maintaining ductal patency and producing hemodynamic stability in patients with the hypoplastic left-heart syndrome who are waiting for heart transplants. Studies of larger numbers of patients with longer follow-up are required to assess the real effect of this procedure on the outcome of patients with this otherwise fatal disorder.

We are indebted to Professor Michael Tynan, M.D., and Peter Whittaker, Ph.D., for their review of the manuscript; to Grace June Marshall, Ph.D. (who died on September 24, 1992), for her assistance in the scanning electron-microscopical study; and to Charles E. Mullins, M.D., for technical assistance.


Source Information

From the Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Rm. 4433, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St., P.O. Box 2000, Loma Linda, CA 92354-0200, where reprint requests should be addressed to Dr. Ruiz.

References

  1. Lev M. Pathologic anatomy and interrelationship of hypoplasia of the aortic tract complexes. Lab Invest 1952;1:61-70. [Medline]
  2. Noonan JA, Nadas AS. The hypoplastic left heart syndrome: an analysis of 101 cases. Pediatr Clin North Am 1958;5:1029-1056. [Medline]
  3. Bailey LL, Gundry SR. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am 1990;37:137-150. [Medline]
  4. Freedom RM. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In: Adams FH, Emmanouilides GC, Riemenschneider TA, eds. Heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989:515-29.
  5. Lambert EC, Canent RV, Hohn AR. Congenital cardiac anomalies in the newborn: a review of conditions causing death or severe distress in the first month of life. Pediatrics 1966;37:343-351. [Free Full Text]
  6. Norwood WI, Kirklin JK, Sanders SP. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: experience with palliative surgery. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:87-91. [CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Norwood WI, Lang P, Hansen DD. Physiologic repair of aortic atresia -- hypoplastic left heart syndrome. N Engl J Med 1983;308:23-26. [Medline]
  8. Murdison KA, Baffa JM, Farrell PE Jr, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: outcome after initial reconstruction and before modified Fontan procedure. Circulation 1990;82:Suppl IV:IV-199. 
  9. Chang AC, Farrell PE Jr, Murdison KA, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: hemodynamic and angiographic assessment after initial reconstructive surgery and relevance to modified Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:1143-1149. [Abstract]
  10. Farrell PE Jr, Chang AC, Murdison KA, Baffa JM, Norwood WI, Murphy JD. Outcome and assessment after the modified Fontan procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 1992;85:116-122. [Free Full Text]
  11. Mayer JE Jr. Fontan procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 1992;85:372-373. [Free Full Text]
  12. Bailey LL, Nehlsen-Cannarella SL, Doroshow RW, et al. Cardiac allotransplantation in newborns as therapy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. N Engl J Med 1986;315:949-951. [Medline]
  13. Chiavarelli M, Gundry RS, Razzouk A, Bailey LL, Loma Linda University Pediatric Heart Transplant Group. Some aspects of neonatal heart transplantation. In: D'Alessandro LC, ed. Heart surgery 1991: Fourth International Symposium on Cardiac Surgery, Rome, May 28-31, 1991. Rome: Casa Editrice Scientifica Internazionale, 1991:491-8.
  14. Boucek MM, Kanakriyeh MS, Mathis CM, Trimm RF III, Bailey LL, Loma Linda University Pediatric Heart Transplant Group. Cardiac transplantation in infancy: donors and recipients. J Pediatr 1990;116:171-176. [Medline]
  15. Cole RB, Abman S, Aziz KU, Bharati S, Lev M. Prolonged prostaglandin E1 infusion: histologic effects on the patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatrics 1981;67:816-819. [Free Full Text]
  16. Lewis AB, Freed MD, Heymann MA, Roehl SL, Kensey RC. Side effects of therapy with prostaglandin E1 in infants with critical congenital heart disease. Circulation 1981;64:893-898. [Free Full Text]
  17. Ringel RE, Brenner JI, Haney PJ, Burns JE, Moulton AL, Berman MA. Prostaglandin-induced periostitis: a complication of long-term PGE1 infusion in an infant with congenital heart disease. Radiology 1982;142:657-658. [Free Full Text]
  18. Schatz RA. A view of vascular stents. Circulation 1989;79:445-457. [Free Full Text]
  19. O'Laughlin MP, Perry SB, Lock JE, Mullins CE. Use of endovascular stents in congenital heart disease. Circulation 1991;83:1923-1939. [Free Full Text]
  20. Becker GJ. Intravascular stents: general principles and status of lower-extremity arterial applications. Circulation 1991;83:Suppl I:I-122. 
  21. Rosenthal E, Qureshi SA, Kakadekar AP, Tabatabaie AH, Baker EJ, Tynan M. Comparison of stent implantation with balloon dilation for maintenance of ductus arteriosus patency. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:Suppl A:25A-25A.abstract 
  22. Coe JY, Olley PM. A novel method to maintain ductus arteriosus patency. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:837-841. [Abstract]
  23. Houde C, Zahn EM, Benson LN, Freedom RM. Stent implantation to maintain ductus arteriosus patency in piglets. Circulation 1992;86:Suppl I:I-632.abstract 

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.