The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 328:1638-1639 June 3, 1993 Number 22
NextNext

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The article by Niemann on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Oct. 8 issue)1 should have stated clearly that the review concerns the treatment of adults and not children, since the doses of drugs and the countershock energy settings given in the article are adult doses.

Although the principles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation are the same in adults and children, the causes of cardiopulmonary arrest are usually different. Cardiopulmonary arrest in children is usually not due to a primary cardiac problem2. In addition, arrest rhythms are different. Outside-the-hospital ventricular fibrillation associated with coronary artery disease is the most common arrhythmia in adults1. The most common arrhythmias in children are asystole or bradyarrhythmias associated with respiratory failure and hypoxia or hypovolemic shock2,3.

The American Heart Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have developed Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) courses, which are excellent hands-on reviews of the recognition and management of cardiopulmonary failure in children. The emphasis is on recognition and aggressive intervention in the attempt to prevent cardiac arrest, since the prognosis of asystole in children is very poor. Physicians and others who work in emergency rooms and other settings where sick children are treated should take such a course. We have found that even experienced emergency physicians and pediatricians may find it helpful.


Brian Nolan, M.D.
George Zureikat, M.D.
Michigan State University College of Human Medicine
Flint, MI 48502

References

  1. Niemann JT. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1075-1080. [Medline]
  2. American Heart Association, American Academy of Pediatrics. Textbook of pediatric advanced life support. Dallas: American Heart Association, 1990.
  3. Pediatric advanced life support. JAMA 1992;268:2262-2275. [CrossRef][Medline]

 
To the Editor: Niemann refers to the measurement of the mean end-tidal volume of carbon dioxide. Measuring volume would be much more difficult than measuring the end-tidal concentration of carbon dioxide. All three of the references cited1,2,3 in relation to measuring end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation refer to measurement of end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration or partial pressure, not volume.


David A. Paulus, M.D.
University of Florida College of Medicine
Gainesville, FL 32610

References

  1. Falk JL, Rackow EC, Weil MH. End-tidal carbon dioxide concentration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 1988;318:607-611. [Abstract]
  2. Garnett AR, Ornato JP, Gonzalez ER, Johnson EB. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 1987;257:512-515. [Abstract]
  3. Barton CW, Callaham ML. Successful prediction by capnometry of resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:393-393.abstract 

 
To the Editor: It seems to me that raising the patient's legs would greatly improve the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Not only would it improve diastolic filling by shifting blood from the leg veins to the central veins, but it would also increase arterial pressure by reducing runoff to the legs. If the thoracic-pump model is correct, then Trendelenburg's position would have the additional advantage of throwing the abdominal organs against the diaphragm, reducing the passive descent of the diaphragm during thoracic compression.


C. Dennis Thron, M.D.
Dartmouth Medical School
Hanover, NH 03755


 
To the Editor: What about the "plumber's helper" technique of cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Has it not panned out? Certainly the popular press touted its arrival. I would like to know its current status.


Daniel C. Wing, M.D.
Community Care Center
Lebanon, NH 03766


 
Dr. Niemann replies:

To the Editor: Drs. Nolan and Zureikat are certainly correct that my review dealt with the management of typical cardiopulmonary arrest in adults because, as I stated, "Sudden cardiac death outside the hospital is most often caused by ventricular fibrillation in patients with multivessel atherosclerotic coronary artery disease." Their comments about the causes of arrest in the pediatric population are well known and accepted. As an instructor in Pediatric Advanced Life Support, I heartily support their recommendation that physicians and nurses who are likely to encounter sick children be encouraged to take the course.

Dr. Paulus is indeed correct. In published studies, end-tidal measurements of carbon dioxide have been reported in units of concentration or partial pressure. This error occurred during the editing process. The volume of carbon dioxide may be more reflective of blood flow in the setting of changing or variable ventilatory tidal volume, as would be expected in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Dr. Thron's comments are interesting. With regard to increasing diastolic filling, Ditchey and Lindenfeld have shown that intravenous volume loading during cardiopulmonary resuscitation worsens the coronary perfusion pressure primarily by raising the right atrial pressure1. It is unlikely that passive leg raising would have a substantial effect on intraabdominal pressure. Our group evaluated the effect of raising intraabdominal pressure on perfusion pressures during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a canine model. A thigh-fitting air-filled bladder inflated to 80 mm Hg had to be used to produce substantial hemodynamic changes2.

With respect to "plumber's helper" cardiopulmonary resuscitation, now referred to as the active compression-decompression technique, I would refer Dr. Wing and other interested readers to two recent articles3,4. This is clearly a promising technique in need of further study. A clinical, multicenter trial is currently in progress.


James T. Niemann, M.D.
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, CA 90509

References

  1. Ditchey RV, Lindenfeld J. Potential adverse effects of volume loading on perfusion of vital organs during closed-chest resuscitation. Circulation 1984;69:181-189. [Free Full Text]
  2. Niemann JT, Rosborough JP, Ung S, Criley JM. Hemodynamic effects of continuous abdominal binding during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:269-274. [Medline]
  3. Cohen TJ, Tucker KJ, Lurie KG, et al. Active compression-decompression: a new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 1992;267:2916-2923. [Abstract]
  4. Cohen TJ, Tucker KJ, Redberg RF, et al. Active compression-decompression resuscitation: a novel method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am Heart J 1992;124:1145-1150. [CrossRef][Medline]

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.