The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 328:453-459 February 18, 1993 Number 7
NextNext

Recombinant Factor VIII for the Treatment of Previously Untreated Patients with Hemophilia A -- Safety, Efficacy, and Development of Inhibitors
Jeanne M. Lusher, Steven Arkin, Charles F. Abildgaard, Richard S. Schwartz, for The Kogenate Previously Untreated Patient Study Group

 

This Article
-Abstract

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Although methods of viral attenuation in plasma-derived clotting-factor concentrates have improved, there is still a possibility that such concentrates may transmit certain blood-borne viruses. For this reason, the use of recombinant DNA-derived factor VIII (which is virus-free) to treat hemophilia A has generated considerable interest.

Methods We conducted a multicenter trial in previously untreated children with hemophilia A. They received recombinant factor VIII for all treatment or for prophylaxis and were evaluated at their respective clinics at intervals of no more than three months.

Results Between January 1, 1989, and July 1, 1992, 95 patients who could be evaluated received recombinant factor VIII. By September 1, 1992, they had received the concentrate exclusively for 2.4 months to 3.5 years (median, 1.5 years). All responded well, with no treatment failures. A total of 3315 infusions were administered; there were three reports of minor adverse reactions. Inhibitor antibodies to factor VIII developed in 16 of 81 patients tested for them, after a median of nine days of exposure to factor VIII treatment. Inhibitor titers were or became low in 9 of the 16 patients despite continued episodic treatment with the concentrate. Inhibitors disappeared completely in 4 patients and remained at a low level (<10 Bethesda units) in 5 patients receiving episodic treatment.

Conclusions Transient or low levels of inhibitor, as observed in this study, may represent part of the natural history of hemophilia in infants. In view of the transient nature and lower concentration of the inhibitors detected and the generally satisfactory response to treatment, the benefits of recombinant factor VIII for the treatment of hemophilia seem to outweigh the risks.


Despite improved methods of viral attenuation of plasma-derived clotting-factor concentrates in recent years, the transmission of certain blood-borne viruses remains a potential problem. This conclusion is supported by recent reports of transmission of human parvovirus by factor VIII and factor IX concentrates pasteurized or treated with solvent detergent1,2; transmission of hepatitis C virus by monoclonal-antibody-purified factor VIII concentrate,3 vapor-treated factor VIII concentrate,4 and factor IX-complex concentrate5; and even transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by chemically treated factor IX complex6. The promise of averting viral transmission through the use of synthetic factor VIII has thus had great appeal to physicians treating hemophilia A.

After the safety and efficacy of recombinant DNA-derived factor VIII concentrate were demonstrated in patients previously treated for hemophilia,7,8 a multicenter trial in previously untreated patients was begun in January 1989. This report describes the study design and the observations made in the first 3.5 years of this ongoing study. The first 20 of these patients were described in the Journal in 19908; since then, an additional 75 patients have been treated, and the entire group has been followed for a much longer period. A noteworthy finding is the early appearance of factor VIII inhibitors in 16 previously untreated patients; in 9 of the 16, the inhibitors have been present only in low concentrations or have disappeared with time despite continued episodic treatment with recombinant factor VIII.

Methods

Patients

All the patients were children or infants with hemophilia A; none had previously received clotting-factor concentrates. Informed written consent was obtained from the parent or guardian of each patient before study. A family history of factor VIII inhibitors was not a reason for exclusion. Between January 1, 1989, and July 1, 1992, 125 patients were recruited for the study, of whom 98 were actually treated with recombinant factor VIII. Two patients who inadvertently received plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate and one who received a massive blood transfusion shortly after the study started were not considered suitable for evaluation and were thus withdrawn from the study. Of the 95 patients who could be evaluated, 93 had no previous exposure to any plasma-derived factor VIII and 2 had received minimal treatment (each had received one treatment with fresh-frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate at birth). The degree of hemophilia A was severe or moderately severe in 59 patients (factor VIII concentration, <0.02 U per milliliter, or <2 percent), moderate in 18 (factor VIII concentration, 0.02 to 0.05 U per milliliter, or 2 to 5 percent), and mild in 18 (factor VIII concentration, >0.05 U per milliliter, or >5 percent). The data reported here were collected before September 1, 1992.

Study Design

A base-line blood sample was drawn from each patient. If the patient had not been immunized with hepatitis B vaccine, immunization was begun (in case red cells or other human blood products were required later). Once a patient received recombinant factor VIII (day 0), he returned to his respective clinic at least once every three months for follow-up evaluation, which included factor VIII-inhibitor assays (Bethesda assay) and antibody screening by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (at Miles Inc., Berkeley, Calif.) as well as hematologic and chemical tests for safety. The patients received only recombinant factor VIII (Kogenate, Miles) for the treatment or prophylaxis of bleeding episodes. Details of the preparation of the concentrate have been summarized previously8; the cell line used in its manufacture has been extensively characterized9 and has not been found to contain endogenous infectious agents. In addition, the purification process includes a combination of steps for clearance and inactivation that have been shown to be very effective in removing model viruses10.

Assays for factor VIII-inhibitor antibody were performed every three months after the first treatment with the concentrate. If a patient was found to have an inhibitor antibody, he was recalled for repeat testing, which included an assay at the laboratory of the hemophilia center and the study's reference laboratory (University of California, Davis). If the level of the inhibitor was confirmed as being 0.6 Bethesda unit or greater, factor VIII recovery was determined by sampling before and 10 minutes after the administration of a challenge dose of the concentrate (50 IU per kilogram of body weight). Recovery was expressed as the increase in the plasma factor VIII level above base line after the challenge (the plasma factor VIII level 10 minutes after infusion, minus the base-line level, expressed as a percentage of the normal level) per unit of the challenge dose per kilogram. If an inhibitor was identified, subsequent assays were performed more frequently.

All data collected were reviewed every six months by an oversight committee comprising six clinical experts not employed by the sponsoring manufacturer. This committee was notified of any adverse events.

The management of inhibitor formation was left to the discretion of the treating physician. Thus, patients with inhibitors could continue to receive the concentrate (in the usual dose, an increased dose, or a high dose to induce immune tolerance) or could be withdrawn from study and treated with another product.

Laboratory Tests

Plasma samples were processed, stored, and assayed for factor VIII as previously described8. Assays for factor VIII inhibitor were carried out at the coagulation laboratory of each participating institution according to the Bethesda method11. Any plasma sample found to have an inhibitor level of 0.6 Bethesda unit or more was considered to be positive for factor VIII inhibitor. Such samples were also sent to the study's reference laboratory for repeat assay for antibodies to factor VIII derived from human plasma, as well as for inhibitor to recombinant factor VIII.

Plasma aliquots from selected patients with inhibitors were also sent to another laboratory (American Red Cross, Rockville, Md.) to determine the heavy-chain and light-chain specificity of the antibody by immunoblotting12,13.

Levels of antibodies to murine IgG, baby-hamster-kidney protein, and recombinant factor VIII were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Miles), and the results were reported as negative, borderline, or positive (expressed as 1+, 2+, or 3+).

Statistical Analysis

The method of Kaplan and Meier14 was used to calculate the cumulative risk that an inhibitor would develop after the first factor VIII treatment; the cumulative risk was plotted in relation to the number of days of exposure to factor VIII. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test15 was used to compare the number of days of exposure in the patients in whom inhibitor developed with the number in the patients in whom inhibitor did not develop.

Results

As of July 1, 1992, 125 previously untreated patients had been recruited for participation in this trial; 98 were treated with recombinant factor VIII at least once. Ninety-five of these 98 patients could be evaluated. The median age at the first treatment with the concentrate in the 59 patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia was 9.1 months (range, 0 to 320); in the 18 with moderate hemophilia, 14.7 months (range, 0.1 to 551); and in the 18 with mild hemophilia, 47 months (range, 4.5 to 658). Figure 1 shows the duration of study in each patient; time 0 represents the day of initial treatment with the factor VIII concentrate. To date, the patients have received the concentrate exclusively for 2.4 months to 3.5 years (median, 1.5 years), and all have responded well (the concentrate was given for spontaneous or traumatic bleeding or invasive procedures). A total of 3315 infusions were administered to the 95 patients who could be evaluated. The concentrate was well tolerated; there were three reports of adverse reactions, all minor, including one report each of urticaria, flushing, and erythema at the infusion site. Follow-up observation revealed no elevations in alanine aminotransferase concentrations, no appearance of antibody to hamster or murine protein, and no evidence of any blood-borne viral infection or any other unusual infection or illness.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Courses of 95 Patients with Hemophilia A Treated with Recombinant Factor VIII Who Had Previously Received No Treatment or Minimal Treatment.

Each horizontal bar represents a single patient. Time 0 denotes the beginning of treatment with factor VIII; treatment was interrupted in two patients (vertical hatching in the first and fourth bars from the top). The solid parts of the bars denote the presence of inhibitor in 15 patients. The diagonal hatching of one bar denotes the presence of high levels of inhibitor in 1 patient, which led to his withdrawal from the study; the other 15 patients with inhibitor continue to receive factor VIII. The inhibitor disappeared in 4 of the 15 while they were receiving episodic treatment with factor VIII, and in 3 others when the induction of immune tolerance was begun with a high dose of recombinant factor VIII daily or every other day.

 
To date, 16 of 81 patients (20 percent) who underwent follow-up assays for inhibitors were found to have an inhibitor to factor VIII (Table 1). Fourteen were among the 49 patients with severe hemophilia and 2 were among the 15 with moderate hemophilia for whom the results of follow-up assays were available. Thus, inhibitors developed in 16 of 64 patients (25 percent) with severe or moderate hemophilia (Table 2). The inhibitors were first detected 1.0 to 14.8 months (median, 6.4) after initial treatment with factor VIII (Figure 1). When the patients considered to be at greatest risk for inhibitor formation -- those with plasma factor VIII levels of 5 percent or less -- were evaluated in relation to the number of days of exposure to the concentrate (defined as the number of days on which they received it), the median was 9 days in those with inhibitor formation (range, 3 to 18 days of exposure before the appearance of inhibitor) and 7 days in those without inhibitor (range, 1 to 187) (P not significant). The cumulative risk of inhibitor formation was 24.8 percent by day 451 after the first treatment with recombinant factor VIII and 36.1 percent after 18 exposure days; both probability curves showed a plateau (Figure 2).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Development of Factor VIII Inhibitor during Factor VIII Treatment in Previously Untreated Patients, According to Base-Line Factor VIII Level.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Summary of Courses of Patients with Inhibitor Formation.

 

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Cumulative Probability of the Development of Factor VIII Inhibitor in 77 Previously Untreated Patients with Severe or Moderate Hemophilia from the Time of Initial Treatment with Recombinant Factor VIII (Panel A) and According to the Number of Days of Exposure to Factor VIII Treatment (Panel B).

Each triangle denotes a patient without inhibitor formation. Hemophilia was defined as severe or moderate if the plasma factor VIII level was 5 percent or less.

 
In 9 of the 16 previously untreated patients with inhibitor formation, the inhibitor titers were low (8 patients) or decreased to a low level (1 patient) despite continued episodic treatment with recombinant factor VIII (Table 2). The inhibitors disappeared completely in four (Patients 2, 3, 7, and 8) and remained at a low level in five (Patients 1, 6, 10, 13, and 14) despite continued episodic treatment (Table 2). In the five patients with low levels of inhibitors (i.e., <= 10 Bethesda units), in vivo studies demonstrated that the recovery of factor VIII levels was reduced to 0.25 percent to 1 percent per international unit per kilogram (normal, >= 2 percent8). All five patients have continued to respond well to factor VIII administered for the treatment of bleeding episodes; most of these patients did not require an increased dose. Figure 3 shows the course of a patient (Patient 3) in whom the inhibitor disappeared despite continued episodic treatment with factor VIII, and the course of another (Patient 1) whose inhibitor titer initially peaked at 15 Bethesda units but has subsequently declined to less than 5 Bethesda units with continuing treatment. Eight patients had somewhat higher concentrations of factor VIII inhibitors that would meet the criteria for high titers (>10 Bethesda units). One of these eight (Patient 4) had an inhibitor concentration of more than 300 Bethesda units after three days of exposure to the concentrate and was withdrawn from the study. He is now being treated with an activated factor IX-complex concentrate (Feiba, Immuno, Rochester, Mich.). Four patients (Patients 5, 9, 11, and 12) were placed on regimens to induce immune tolerance (by their physicians' choice) with high doses of recombinant factor VIII16,17. Since a standardized protocol for immune tolerance was not available until early 1992, each patient was treated somewhat differently. Patients 5 and 12 underwent the induction of immune tolerance with a dose of 50 IU per kilogram per day, Patient 11 received 100 IU per kilogram per day, and Patient 9 received 50 IU per kilogram every other day. Patients 5, 9, and 11, who had peak inhibitor titers of 19, 19.5, and 34 Bethesda units, respectively, had excellent responses to the induction of immune tolerance, with complete disappearance of their inhibitors 13, 381, and 35 days, respectively, after the regimen began. The fourth, Patient 12, has had no serious bleeding episodes, despite a poor response to the immune-tolerance regimen. His inhibitor concentration was more than 300 Bethesda units when the immune-tolerance regimen began, and he had a strong family history of high titers of inhibitors to factor VIII (>3000 Bethesda units).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Declines in Titers of Factor VIII Inhibitor in Two Patients with Representative Courses.

Panel A shows the course of Patient 3, who had low levels of inhibitor; the inhibitor disappeared despite continued episodic treatment with factor VIII. His course is representative of those of the other three patients (Patients 2, 7, and 8) whose inhibitor disappeared despite continuing treatment. Each open circle represents a single day of exposure to recombinant factor VIII (vertically placed circles denote consecutive days of treatment), and solid squares represent inhibitor levels. Day 0 denotes the day of initial treatment with recombinant factor VIII. Patient 3 received three doses of factor IX complex (open triangles) and five doses of plasma-derived factor VIII (open squares); each factor was given over a three-day period.

Panel B shows the course of Patient 1, whose inhibitor titer initially peaked at 15 Bethesda units but has subsequently remained low, below 5 Bethesda units, during episodic therapy with recombinant factor VIII. His course is representative of those of the four other patients (Patients 6, 10, 13, and 14) whose inhibitor titers have remained low, generally below 10 Bethesda units, despite continued episodic treatment with recombinant factor VIII. The inhibitor titer increased slightly in Patient 1 after multiple treatments with factor VIII, to 4.5 Bethesda units at approximately day 1000, but then declined to less than 2 Bethesda units during continuing treatment. This patient received six doses of porcine factor VIII over a three-day period at approximately day 400 (open triangles).

 
Three of the 16 patients with inhibitor formation had relatives with hemophilia and inhibitors to plasma-derived factor VIII (Patients 10 and 11 each had one such relative, and Patient 12 had two). Two patients who did not have inhibitor formation also had relatives with both hemophilia and inhibitors.

At present, 15 of the 16 patients with inhibitor formation are continuing to receive treatment with recombinant factor VIII; 11 receive it "on demand" (as necessary), and 4 according to immune-tolerance regimens.

To date, plasma samples from three of the previously untreated patients with higher titers of inhibitors have been analyzed for the heavy-chain and light-chain specificity of factor VIII antibody. All three inhibitors were reactive, showing both 44-kd and 72-kd bands on Western blotting that were consistent with reactivity with both heavy-chain and light-chain determinants of factor VIII (Hoyer L: personal communication). This pattern has been observed in inhibitors that develop after exposure to plasma-derived factor VIII products12,13,18,19. When studied with the Bethesda assay, the inhibitors had similar titers against both recombinant and plasma-derived factor VIII (data not shown).

Discussion

During the first 3.5 years of observation in this ongoing study, 95 patients with hemophilia A were treated with recombinant factor VIII. The majority have had excellent clinical responses. No patient had evidence of any unusual infection or illness. Factor VIII inhibitors developed in 16 patients, usually after relatively brief exposure to the concentrate (median, 9 days of exposure; range, 3 to 18). In nine of these patients the inhibitors were present in low titers or declined to low levels despite continued episodic treatment with recombinant factor VIII. Inhibitors disappeared completely in four patients during episodic ("on demand") treatment, while in five others the titers remained below 10 Bethesda units during this treatment.

Althoviii ugh most published reports state that inhibitor antibodies to factor VIII develop in 10 to 15 percent of persons with hemophilia A,20,21,22,23,24 these data and estimates have been derived from studies that differed from the current investigation in a number of important design considerations and risk factors. For example, the Cooperative Inhibitor Study sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute reported an incidence of new inhibitor formation of eight cases per 1000 patient-years of observation, but this incidence was based on the study of previously treated patients, a group known to be at much lower risk for inhibitor formation than previously untreated patients24. Since that study did not include previously untreated patients, its results cannot be compared directly with ours.

In the current investigation, previously untreated patients were prospectively screened at three-month intervals by means of inhibitor assays, whether or not clinically indicated; inhibitors that were transient or present in low concentrations might have been missed entirely had the patients not been under such close surveillance. Although several relatively small cohorts of previously untreated patients have been enrolled in trials testing the safety of new factor VIII preparations with regard to hepatitis, the majority of these studies have been short-term trials to determine the safety of a particular product25 for hepatitis viruses (and HIV), rather than prospective studies of inhibitor development. The majority of these reports do not even mention inhibitor assays, and in many of their previously untreated patients the exposure days were few; follow-up generally lasted only six months, the period required for trials examining safety in relation to hepatitis. If the current investigation had been limited to six months, only 8 of the 16 patients with inhibitors would have been detected among the 95 patients who could be evaluated.

Thus, previous studies may have underestimated the incidence of inhibitor formation and the number of exposure days before inhibitor formation in previously untreated patients. In three of four recent studies of previously untreated patients who received plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates,26,27,28,29,30 the incidence of inhibitor formation was high, ranging from 18.4 to 52 percent. Two recent retrospective studies of patients with hemophilia who were followed from birth and treated with plasma-derived factor VIII products of intermediate purity have also reported cumulative lifelong incidences of inhibitor development of 22 percent31 and 24 percent,32 respectively. These more recent observations suggest that inhibitor antibodies may develop more frequently in patients with hemophilia A than has previously been recognized. In a 15-year study (1976 to 1991) by Ehrenforth et al.,29 inhibitors were found in 15 of 46 previously untreated patients with hemophilia A (33 percent) treated with plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates. Among those with base-line factor VIII values below 1 percent, the incidence of inhibitor formation was even greater -- 14 of 27 patients, or 52 percent. Inhibitors were detected early, between the ages of 1 month and 5 years; 11 of the 15 patients with inhibitors were identified during the first 2.6 years of life. The median number of exposure days before inhibitor formation was 11, an interval similar to the 9 exposure days in the present study. It thus appears that in previously untreated patients in whom an inhibitor will develop, inhibitor will form quite early after treatment.

There may be a "natural history" of transient, low-level inhibitor formation in infants and children with hemophilia who are treated with factor VIII. It is recognized that some inhibitors with low titers disappear,24 others remain present in low titers, and a few ultimately have high titers20. Even high titers may decline with episodic factor VIII treatment33. The pathogenesis of inhibitor formation and the reason why some inhibitors disappear are poorly understood at present.

Investigators in Belgium and the Netherlands recently reported a sudden increase in the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors among previously treated patients with hemophilia who received a new plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate produced in the Netherlands34. There is no evidence that the inhibitors observed in the current study were related to the concentrate used, but the possibility that it has an unusual antigenicity cannot be completely excluded35. However, no such antigenicity was observed during extensive preclinical investigation of the preparation,36 and only 1 of 102 previously treated patients had inhibitor formation for the first time after being treated with recombinant factor VIII8. If recombinant factor VIII were immunogenic, one would expect a much greater incidence of inhibitor formation. In our study, the three inhibitors with high titers recognized both the light and heavy chains of factor VIII, as do inhibitors in patients with hemophilia treated only with plasma-derived factor VIII12,13,18,19. These data do not suggest that recombinant factor VIII has a unique antigenicity.

In our study, factor VIII was well tolerated, and the response to treatment was excellent. We observed a relatively high prevalence of inhibitors with low titers among our patients. Surveys of populations with hemophilia for antiidiotypic antibodies, studies of the T-cell response during the first several exposures to recombinant factor VIII, and similar studies of plasma-derived factor VIII products may elucidate the mechanisms involved. Despite the generally low-titer inhibitors detected in our prospective study, the benefits of recombinant factor VIII are thought to outweigh its risks.

Supported by a grant from Miles Inc.


Source Information

From Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit (J.M.L.); Mount Sinai Medical School, New York (S.A.); the University of California, Davis (C.F.A.); and the Department of Clinical Research, Miles Inc., Berkeley, Calif. (R.S.S.). Presented in part as an abstract at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Denver, December 7-10, 1991.The members of the Kogenate Previously Untreated Patient Study Group are listed in the Appendix.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Lusher at Children's Hospital of Michigan, 3901 Beaubien Blvd., Detroit, MI 48201.

References

  1. Azzi A, Ciappi S, Zakvrzewska K, Morfini M, Mariani G, Mannucci PM. Human parvovirus B19 infection in hemophiliacs first infused with two high-purity, virally attenuated factor VIII concentrates. Am J Hematol 1992;39:228-230. [Medline]
  2. Lyon DJ, Chapman CS, Martin C, et al. Symptomatic parvovirus B19 infection and heat-treated factor IX concentrate. Lancet 1989;1:1085-1085. [Medline]
  3. Berntorp E, Nilsson IM, Ljung R, Widell A. Hepatitis C virus transmission by monoclonal antibody purified factor VIII concentrate. Lancet 1990;335:1531-1532. 
  4. Mannucci PM, Zanetti AR, Colombo M, et al. Antibody to hepatitis C virus after a vapor-treated factor VIII concentrate. Thromb Haemost 1990;64:232-234. [Medline]
  5. Lusher JM, Transfusion Safety Study Group. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission with clotting factor concentrates in current use. Blood 1991;78:Suppl 1:1409-1409.abstract 
  6. Kleim JP, Bailly E, Schneweis KE, et al. Acute HIV-1 infection in patients with hemophilia B treated with {beta}-propriolactone-UV-inactivated clotting factor. Thromb Haemost 1990;64:336-337. [Medline]
  7. White GC II, McMillan CW, Kingdon HS, Shoemaker CB. Use of recombinant antihemophilic factor in the treatment of two patients with classic hemophilia. N Engl J Med 1989;320:166-170. [Medline]
  8. Schwartz RS, Abildgaard CF, Aledort LM, et al. Human recombinant DNA-derived antihemophilic factor (factor VIII) in the treatment of hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1800-1805. [Abstract]
  9. Chan SY, Lembach KJ. Genetic characterization of recombinant BHK-21 cells expressing factor VIII. Semin Hematol 1991;28:Suppl 1:10-16. [Medline]
  10. Klein U. Production and characterization of recombinant Factor VIII. Semin Hematol 1991;28:Suppl 1:17-21.
  11. Kasper CK, Aledort LM, Counts RB, et al. A more uniform measurement of Factor VIII inhibitors. Thromb Diath Haemorrh 1975;34:869-872. [Medline]
  12. Hoyer LW, Gawryl MS, de la Fuente B. Immunochemical characterization of factor VIII inhibitors. Prog Clin Biol Res 1984;150:73-85. [Medline]
  13. Fulcher CA, de Graaf Mahoney S, Zimmerman TS. FVIII inhibitor IgG subclass and FVIII polypeptide specificity determined by immunoblotting. Blood 1987;69:1475-1480. [Free Full Text]
  14. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.
  15. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1945;1:80-3.
  16. Brackmann HH, Gormsen J. Massive factor-VIII infusion in haemophiliac with factor-VIII inhibitor, high responder. Lancet 1977;2:933-933. [Medline]
  17. Ewing NP, Sanders NL, Dietrich SL, Kasper CK. Induction of immune tolerance to factor VIII in hemophiliacs with inhibitors. JAMA 1988;259:65-68. [Abstract]
  18. Scandella D, Mattingly M, de Graaf S, Fulcher CA. Localization of epitopes for human factor VIII inhibitor antibodies by immunoblotting and antibody neutralization. Blood 1989;74:1618-1626. [Free Full Text]
  19. Hoyer LW. Immunochemical properties of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1991;2:Suppl 1:11-15.
  20. Lusher JM. Factor VIII inhibitors: etiology, characterization, natural history, and management. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1987;509:89-102. [Medline]
  21. Lusher JM. Current perspectives on the significance and interpretation of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1991;2:Suppl 1:1-3.
  22. Gill FM. The natural history of factor VIII inhibitors in patients with hemophilia A. Prog Clin Biol Res 1984;150:19-29. [Medline]
  23. White GC II, McMillan CW, Blatt PM, Roberts HR. Factor VIII inhibitors: a clinical overview. Am J Hematol 1982;13:335-342. [Medline]
  24. McMillan CW, Shapiro SS, Whitehurst D, et al. The natural history of factor VIII:C inhibitors in patients with hemophilia A: a national cooperative study. II. Observations on the initial development of factor VIII:C inhibitors. Blood 1988;71:344-348. [Free Full Text]
  25. Mannucci PM, Colombo M. Revision of the protocol recommended for studies of safety from hepatitis of clotting factor concentrates. Thromb Haemost 1989;61:532-534. [Medline]
  26. Lusher JM, Salzman PM, Monoclate Study Group. Viral safety and inhibitor development associated with factor VIIIC ultra-purified from plasma in hemophiliacs previously unexposed to factor VIIIC concentrates. Semin Hematol 1990;27:Suppl 2:1-7. [Medline]
  27. Lusher JM. Viral safety and inhibitor development associated with monoclonal antibody-purified F VIII C. Ann Hematol 1991;63:138-141. [Medline]
  28. Addiego JE Jr, Gomperts E, Liu S-L, et al. Treatment of hemophilia A with a highly purified factor VIII concentrate prepared by anti-FVIIIc immunoaffinity chromatography. Thromb Haemost 1992;67:19-27. [Medline]
  29. Ehrenforth S, Kreuz W, Scharrer I, et al. Incidence of development of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors in haemophiliacs. Lancet 1992;339:594-598. [CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Buchanan G, Johnson A. High frequency of factor VIII inhibitors in infants and young boys recently diagnosed as having severe factor VIII deficiency. Presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the National Hemophilia Foundation, Tampa, Fla., October 8-12, 1991. abstract.
  31. Schwarzinger I, Pabinger I, Korninger C, et al. Incidence of inhibitors in patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A treated with factor VIII concentrates. Am J Hematol 1987;24:241-245. [Medline]
  32. Rasi V, Ikkala E. Haemophiliacs with factor VIII inhibitors in Finland: prevalence, incidence and outcome. Br J Haematol 1990;76:369-371. [Medline]
  33. Rizza CR, Matthews JM. Effect of frequent factor VIII replacement on the level of factor VIII antibodies in haemophiliacs. Br J Haematol 1982;52:13-24. [Medline]
  34. Vermylen J, Peerlinck K. Epidemic of factor VIII inhibitors linked to factor VIII-P. Acta Clin Belg 1991;46:419-420. [Medline]
  35. Roberts HR. Antigenicity of highly purified factor VIII concentrates. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1991;2:Suppl 1:17-19. [Medline]
  36. Fournel MA. Preclinical and in vitro studies of recombinant factor VIII. Semin Hematol 1991;28:Suppl 1:22-26. 
Appendix

The following people and institutions were participants in this trial by the Kogenate Previously Untreated Patient Study Group. Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit: J. Lusher, I. Warrier, and L. Pfaffman; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York: S. Arkin, L.M. Aledort, and A. Forster; University of California, Davis: C.F. Abildgaard and J. Harrison; Albany Medical College, Albany, N.Y.: J.M. Pearce; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh: M. Ragni, B. Miller, and E. Carfagna; Tulane Medical School, New Orleans: W.A. Andes; College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing: R. Kulkarni; Rehabilitation Hospital and Hemophilia Center, Rehabilitation Foundation, Heidelberg, Germany: R. Zimmerman and A. Huth-Kuhne; University of Milan, Milan, Italy: P.M. Mannucci, A. Gringeri, and L. Simoni; University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome: F. Mandelli; University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany: I. Scharrer and E. Aygoren (Department of Internal Medicine), and W. Kreuz and R. Linde (Department of Pediatrics); Children's Hospital, Oakland, Calif.: J.E. Addiego, Jr., and J. Test; Cornell University Medical Center, New York: M.W. Hilgartner; St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ont., Canada: M.J. Inwood, E. Inwood, and E. Clegg; Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio: C.E. Krill; Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pa.: E. Eyster and S. Neagley; State University of New York, Syracuse: T. Coyle; Yale University Medical School, New Haven, Conn.: D. Beardsley and A. Conroy; Hospital Nuovo Pellegrini, Naples, Italy: R. De Biasi; Malmo General Hospital, Malmo, Sweden: R. Ljung; Sahlgren's Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden: L. Tengborn; Children's Hospital, Barcelona, Spain: J. Tusell; Hospital "Marques de Valdecilla," Santander, Spain: A. Zubizarreta; Children's Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio: L.P. Valdez; Juan Canalejo Hospital, La Coruna, Spain: F. Batlle; University of Munich, Munich, Germany: W. Schramm; and Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.: G. Despande.

Data collection, clinical study coordination, and analysis: North America -- Miles Inc., Berkeley, Calif.: R.S. Schwartz, R.U. Allred, M.A. MacKenzie, P. Bailey, S. Dyla, and J.E. Pennington; Europe -- Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany: D. Maruhn; Tropon, Cologne, Germany: R. Neumann.

Recombinant Factor VIII Clinical Planning Committee: J. Lusher (chairperson), Detroit; P. Mannucci, Milan; M. Inwood, London, Ont., Canada; A. Bloom, Cardiff, Wales; H. Brackmann, Bonn, Germany; and H. Fukui, Nara, Japan.


 

This Article
-Abstract

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.