Background Environmental tobacco smoke has been classified bythe Environmental Protection Agency as a carcinogen causallyassociated with lung cancer in adults, but there have been noreports of lung carcinogens or their metabolites in the bodyfluids or tissues of nonsmokers exposed to environmental tobaccosmoke.
Methods Five male nonsmokers were exposed to sidestream cigarettesmoke generated by machine smoking of reference cigarettes for180 minutes on each of two days, six months apart. Sidestreamsmoke is the smoke that originates from the smoldering end ofa cigarette between puffs. Twenty-four-hour urine samples werecollected before and after exposure. The urine samples wereanalyzed for 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL)and its glucuronide, which are metabolites of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone(NNK), a powerful lung carcinogen in rodents. NNAL is also alung carcinogen in rodents.
Results The urinary excretion of the metabolites increased afterexposure to sidestream smoke in all the men. The mean (±SD)amount of NNAL and NNAL glucuronide was significantly higherafter exposure than at base line (33.9 ±20.0 vs. 8.4±11.2 ng per 24 hours [127 ±74 vs. 31 ±41pmol per day], P<0.001) and was correlated with urinary cotinineexcretion (r = 0.89, P<0.001). The nicotine concentrationsin the air to which the men were exposed were comparable tothose in a heavily smoke-polluted bar.
Conclusions Nonsmokers exposed to sidestream cigarette smoketake up and metabolize a lung carcinogen, which provides experimentalsupport for the proposal that environmental tobacco smoke cancause lung cancer.
Environmental tobacco smoke has been classified by the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) as a human carcinogen. A recent report1concluded: "Passive smoking is causally associated with lungcancer in adults, and environmental tobacco smoke, by the totalweight of evidence, belongs in the category of compounds classifiedby the EPA as Group A (known human) carcinogens." This evaluationwas based in part on dose-response relations between the exposureof spouses to environmental tobacco smoke and the developmentof lung cancer, especially pulmonary adenocarcinoma2. Therehave been numerous studies of noncarcinogenic tobacco constituentssuch as nicotine and cotinine in the blood and urine of nonsmokers,and recent studies have established the presence of adductsof hemoglobin and 4-aminobiphenyl, a bladder carcinogen, innonsmokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke3,4. In thispaper, we describe the presence of metabolites of a tobacco-specificlung carcinogen, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone(NNK), in the urine of nonsmokers exposed to sidestream cigarettesmoke. Sidestream cigarette smoke is the smoke that originatesfrom the smoldering end of a cigarette between puffs; it isthe principal component of environmental tobacco smoke.
NNK is a powerful pulmonary carcinogen, inducing predominantlyadenocarcinomas in the lungs of rats, mice, and hamsters regardlessof the route of administration5,6,7. The lowest total dosesrequired to induce lung tumors in rats are similar to the totaldoses to which smokers are exposed, as calculated from boththe amounts of NNK in mainstream cigarette smoke and measurementsof its metabolites in the urine of smokers8,9,10. These data,as well as biochemical studies that have demonstrated the presencein smokers' lungs of DNA adducts likely to result from the metabolicactivation of NNK, suggest that NNK has an important role inthe induction of lung cancer in smokers11,12. In primates, NNKis extensively metabolized13. Although NNK itself is barelydetectable in urine, up to 25 percent of the dose is excretedas glucuronide conjugates of its carbonyl reduction product,4-(methyl-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL). NNALis also a powerful lung carcinogen in rodents7,14. Recently,we demonstrated the presence of these metabolites in the urineof smokers10. In this study, we measured NNAL, its glucuronide,and cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine, in the urine of nonsmokersexposed to sidestream smoke.
Methods
Study Design
We conducted two identical studies, each involving five menwho were nonsmokers. The five men in study 1 ranged in age from29 to 49 years. Four of these men participated in study 2; thefifth subject in study 2 was 57 years old. The protocol wasapproved by the American Health Foundation's institutional reviewboard for the protection of human subjects, and all the mengave written informed consent. No restrictions were placed onthe participants before the studies.
Study 1 was conducted in August 1992, and study 2 in February1993. Two days before exposure to sidestream smoke, each mancollected a 24-hour urine sample for the measurement of NNALand its glucuronide.
The men were exposed to sidestream smoke in a 16-m3 room withlimited ventilation. There were two smoke-exposure sessionsin each study: session 1 lasted from 9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m., andsession 2 from 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. During each session, thefive men sat together quietly in the room while sidestream smokewas generated by a smoking machine. Only sidestream smoke wasallowed to enter the atmosphere in the room; mainstream smokewas trapped on a 92-mm Cambridge filter, and the remaining gasphase was pumped out of the room. In session 1, six Universityof Kentucky 2R1 reference cigarettes (nonfilter) were smokedon a Borgwaldt 20-port smoking machine with a rotating headunder standard smoking conditions (duration of puff, 2 seconds;frequency, one per minute; and volume, 35 ml), at the rate oftwo cigarettes simultaneously every 30 minutes. In session 2,12 Kentucky 2R1 reference cigarettes were smoked under the sameconditions, at the rate of 4 every 30 minutes. We used two sessionsto avoid prolonged continuous exposure of the men to sidestreamcigarette smoke. There was less exposure in session 1 than insession 2 to allow the subjects to become acclimated to thesmoke. On the day of smoke exposure, the men collected 24-hoururine specimens beginning at 11 a.m., when session 1 ended.This schedule was chosen so that all urine produced after exposureto NNK in sidestream smoke would be collected, since NNK metabolitesare excreted rapidly.
Analyses
The concentrations of nicotine and NNK in the air were determinedby standard methods15,16. The 24-hour urine samples were analyzedfor NNAL and its glucuronide by a modification of our publishedmethod, which has interassay coefficients of variation of 9.7percent for NNAL and 17.1 percent for NNAL glucuronide10. Fiftynanograms of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (iso-NNAL)was used as an internal standard instead of [5-3H]NNAL.
The pH of the urine was adjusted to 7, and the urine was extractedfour times with ethyl acetate. The extracts were combined, theinternal standard was added, and the solution was dried andconcentrated to produce fraction 1, which contained unconjugatedNNAL. The aqueous layer was treated with 500,000 units of beta-glucuronidasetype IXA (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis). Internal standard wasadded, the pH was adjusted to 2, and the mixture was extractedwith ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate extracts were discarded.The pH was adjusted to 7, and the resulting mixture was extractedfour times with methylene chloride. The extracts were driedand concentrated to produce fraction 2, which contained NNALreleased from NNAL glucuronide.
Fractions 1 and 2 were further purified by reverse-phase andnormal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, as describedpreviously, for analysis by gas chromatography, mass spectrometry,and selected ion monitoring10. A slight modification was theaddition of a retention-time marker, 3-pyridyl-1-propanol (AldrichChemical, Milwaukee), to the samples before normal-phase analysis.It eluted at 22 minutes. The fractions containing NNAL (retentiontime, 37 minutes) and iso-NNAL (retention time, 36 minutes)were collected and analyzed by gas chromatography and thermal-energyanalysis10. Cotinine in urine was measured by radioimmunoassay17.
Representative chromatograms of urine samples from the men beforeand after exposure to sidestream smoke are shown in Figure 1.Evidence supporting the identity of NNAL, both free and releasedby beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis of NNAL glucuronide, is basedon its retention times on reverse-phase and normal-phase high-performanceliquid chromatography, the retention time of NNAL trimethylsilylether on gas chromatography, and the detection of NNAL trimethylsilylether by gas chromatography with a thermal-energy analyzer asa nitrosamine-selective detector. In our previous study of NNALand NNAL glucuronide in the urine of smokers, we confirmed theidentity of NNAL trimethylsilyl ether by gas chromatography,mass spectrometry, and selected ion monitoring. In this study,the small quantities of NNAL and its glucuronide that were presentin urine precluded other analyses. The mean proportion recoveredwas 72 percent for NNAL and 48 percent for NNAL glucuronide.The results in Table 1 have been corrected for recovery.
Figure 1. Chromatograms of Fraction 2 Containing NNAL Released from NNAL Glucuronide.
The results of gas chromatography and thermal-energy analysis are from Subject 1 in study 2. The internal standards nitrosoguvacoline (NG), added before injection, and iso-NNAL, added at the beginning of the analysis and detected as its trimethylsilyl derivative (TMS), are indicated.
Table 1. NNAL and Its Glucuronide in the Urine of Men before and after Exposure to Sidestream Cigarette Smoke.
Each urine sample was analyzed once for NNAL, NNAL glucuronide,and cotinine. Results of the analyses of urine samples fromthe men before and after exposure are expressed as means (±SD).Statistical comparisons were carried out with t-tests (two-tailed).
Results
The results of the measurements of NNAL and its glucuronidein the 24-hour urine samples are shown in Table 1. In all themen for whom data were available, excretion of the metabolitesincreased after exposure to sidestream smoke.
In the two studies, seven measurements of urinary NNAL and itsglucuronide were obtained after exposure, for six of which correspondingbase-line results were also available. The mean amount of NNALand its glucuronide was significantly higher in the seven measurementsmade after exposure than in the six made at base line (33.9±20.0 vs. 8.4 ±11.2 ng per 24 hours [127 ±74vs. 31 ±41 pmol per day], P<0.001). The mean urinaryexcretion of cotinine was also significantly higher after exposurethan before (89.6 ±35.9 vs. 8.9 ±9.7 µgper 24 hours [509 ±204 vs. 50 ±55 nmol per day],P<0.001). In the six cases in which NNAL and its glucuronidewere measured both before and after exposure, the excretionof these metabolites after exposure to sidestream smoke increasedby a factor of 10.2 ±12.8 (range, 2.2 to 35.4). The correspondingincrease in urinary cotinine excretion in these six cases was18.7 ±12.4 times (range, 4.0 to 33.2). The urinary excretionof NNAL and NNAL glucuronide and that of cotinine were correlated(r = 0.89, P<0.001) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Relation between 24-Hour Urinary Excretion of NNAL and NNAL Glucuronide and Cotinine Excretion in Nonsmokers before (Open Circles) and after (Solid Circles) Exposure to Sidestream Cigarette Smoke.
To convert values for NNAL to picomoles per day, multiply by 4.78; to convert values for NNAL glucuronide to picomoles per day, multiply by 2.59; and to convert values for cotinine to nanomoles per day, multiply by 5.68.
In three cases -- with Subject 4 in studies 1 and 2 and Subject2 in study 2 -- the base-line results indicated exposure toNNK. In Subject 4, the urinary cotinine values before both studieswere also consistent with exposure to tobacco smoke. In allthe other cases the base-line urinary excretion of NNAL or NNALglucuronide was either below or close to the limit of detection.
In our previous study10 of NNAL and its glucuronide in the urineof smokers, the molar ratio of those substances to cotininewas 1:3900. In this study, the corresponding ratio was 1:4600±1800. The mean 24-hour urinary excretion of NNAL andits glucuronide in the urine of 11 smokers was 4.0 ±1.7µg per 24 hours (11 ±4 nmol per day), which, comparedwith the data from the current study, indicates that NNK uptakewas about 120 times greater in smokers than in nonsmokers exposedto sidestream smoke.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated the uptake and metabolism ofNNK by nonsmokers exposed to sidestream cigarette smoke. Themetabolites identified in urine were NNAL and its glucuronide.NNAL, like NNK, is a potent pulmonary carcinogen in rats andmice, inducing a high incidence of adenocarcinoma of the lung7,14.Our demonstration that nonsmokers take up NNK thus providessupport for the conclusion of the EPA that environmental tobaccosmoke causes lung cancer in humans. It is notable that NNK andNNAL induce primarily pulmonary adenocarcinomas, as occurs innonsmokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke2,6,7,14.
The major lung carcinogens in cigarette smoke appear to be NNKand polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons18. In indoor air pollutedwith tobacco smoke, the total concentrations of polynucleararomatic hydrocarbons are similar to those of NNK16,19. Theuptake of carcinogenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons bynonsmokers after exposure to environmental tobacco smoke hasnot been reported.
The ratio of NNAL and NNAL glucuronide to cotinine in urinewas similar in passive smokers (1:4600) and active smokers (1:3900).The concentrations of nicotine and NNK in the sidestream smokeof a Kentucky 2R1 cigarette are about twice those in mainstreamsmoke. A constant ratio of NNAL and NNAL glucuronide to cotininecould therefore be expected in the urine of passive and activesmokers, an expectation consistent with our results. A previousstudy of 4-aminobiphenyl hemoglobin adducts in nonsmokers exposedto environmental tobacco smoke also demonstrated that biomarkerlevels in passive smokers were related to concentrations of4-aminobiphenyl and nicotine in sidestream smoke4.
The exposure to sidestream smoke in this study was comparableto that which might be encountered in a heavily smoke-pollutedbar, given the nicotine concentrations in our exposure roomand those reported previously in bars (up to 119 µg percubic meter)20,21. Most indoor environments would have lowerconcentrations of nicotine and NNK than those in our exposureroom,16,19,22,23 and the concentrations of NNAL and its glucuronidein the urine of people in those environments would probablybe lower than the concentrations reported here. Our resultsnevertheless establish the principle that NNK is taken up andmetabolized by nonsmokers who are exposed to sidestream cigarettesmoke, and they therefore provide evidence supporting the linkbetween exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the riskof lung cancer.
Supported by a grant (29580) from the National Cancer Institute.
We are indebted to Stephen Colosimo of the Clinical BiochemistryFacility of the American Health Foundation for carrying outthe cotinine analyses.
Source Information
From the American Health Foundation, Valhalla, NY 10595, where reprint requests should be addressed to Dr. Hecht.
References
Environmental Protection Agency. Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders. Washington, D.C.: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, 1992:1-4.
Fontham ET, Correa P, Wu-Williams A, et al. Lung cancer in nonsmoking women: a multicenter case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1991;1:35-43. [Abstract]
Environmental Protection Agency. Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders. Washington, D.C.: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, 1992:3-40-3-48.
Hammond SK, Coghlin J, Gann PH, et al. Relationship between environmental tobacco smoke exposure and carcinogen-hemoglobin adduct levels in nonsmokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:474-478. [Free Full Text]
Hoffmann D, Hecht SS. Nicotine-derived N-nitrosamines and tobacco-related cancer: current status and future directions. Cancer Res 1985;45:935-944. [Free Full Text]
Hecht SS, Hoffmann D. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines, an important group of carcinogens in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Carcinogenesis 1988;9:875-884. [Free Full Text]
Rivenson A, Hoffmann D, Prokopczyk B, Amin S, Hecht SS. Induction of lung and exocrine pancreas tumors in F344 rats by tobacco-specific and Areca-derived N-nitrosamines. Cancer Res 1988;48:6912-6917. [Free Full Text]
Hecht SS, Hoffmann D. The relevance of tobacco-specific nitrosamines to human cancer. Cancer Surv 1989;8:273-294. [Medline]
Hecht SS, Hoffmann D. 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, a nicotine-derived tobacco-specific nitrosamine, and cancer of the lung and pancreas in humans. In: Brugge J, Curran T, Harlow E, McCormick F, eds. Origins of human cancer: a comprehensive review. Plainview, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1991:745-55.
Carmella SG, Akerkar S, Hecht SS. Metabolites of the tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in smokers' urine. Cancer Res 1993;53:721-724. [Free Full Text]
Foiles PG, Akerkar SA, Carmella SG, et al. Mass spectrometric analysis of tobacco-specific nitrosamine-DNA adducts in smokers and nonsmokers. Chem Res Toxicol 1991;4:364-368. [CrossRef][Medline]
Mustonen R, Schoket B, Hemminki K. Smoking-related DNA adducts: 32P-postlabeling analysis of 7-methylguanine in human bronchial and lymphocyte DNA. Carcinogenesis 1993;14:151-154. [Free Full Text]
Hecht SS, Trushin N, Reid-Quinn CA, et al. Metabolism of the tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in the patas monkey: pharmacokinetics and characterization of glucuronide metabolites. Carcinogenesis 1993;14:229-236. [Free Full Text]
Castonguay A, Lin D, Stoner GD, et al. Comparative carcinogenicity in A/J mice and metabolism by cultured mouse peripheral lung of N'-nitrosonornicotine, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, and their analogues. Cancer Res 1983;43:1223-1229. [Free Full Text]
Brunnemann KD. Determination of nicotine and minor tobacco alkaloids in indoor air by absorption and gas chromatography. In: Seifert B, van de Wiel HJ, Dodet B, O'Neill IK, eds. Environmental carcinogens: methods of analysis and exposure measurement. Vol. 12. Indoor air. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1993:275-80. (IARC scientific publications no. 109.)
Brunnemann KD, Cox JE, Hoffmann D. Analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in indoor air. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:2415-2418. [Free Full Text]
Haley NJ, Axelrad CM, Tilton KA. Validation of self-reported smoking behavior: biochemical analysis of cotinine and thiocyanate. Am J Public Health 1983;73:1204-1207. [Free Full Text]
Hoffmann D, Hecht SS. Advances in tobacco carcinogenesis. In: Cooper CS, Grover PL, eds. Chemical carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. Vol. 94 of Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1990:63-102.
Guerin MR, Jenkins RA, Tomkins BA. The chemistry of environmental tobacco smoke: composition and measurement. Boca Raton, Fla.: Lewis Publishers, 1992:229-46.
Brunnemann KD, Cox JE, Kagan MR, et al. Analysis of selected environmental tobacco smoke components in indoor air by thermal desorption-GC-MS. In: Proceedings of the CORESTA Symposium, Kallithea, Greece, October 7-11, 1990. Paris: CORESTA, 1990:100-7.
Eatough DJ, Benner CL, Tang H, et al. The chemical composition of environmental tobacco smoke. III. Identification of conservative tracers of environmental tobacco smoke. Environ Int 1989;15:19-28.
Thompson CV, Jenkins RA, Higgins CE. A thermal desorption method for the determination of nicotine in indoor environments. Environ Sci Technol 1989;23:429-35.
Environmental Protection Agency. Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders. Washington, D.C.: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, 1992:3-28.
Roethig, H. J., Munjal, S., Feng, S., Liang, Q., Sarkar, M., Walk, R.-A., Mendes, P. E.
(2009). Population estimates for biomarkers of exposure to cigarette smoke in adult U.S. cigarette smokers. Nicotine Tob Res
11: 1216-1225
[Abstract][Full Text]
Samet, J. M., Avila-Tang, E., Boffetta, P., Hannan, L. M., Olivo-Marston, S., Thun, M. J., Rudin, C. M.
(2009). Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: Clinical Epidemiology and Environmental Risk Factors. Clin. Cancer Res.
15: 5626-5645
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lippman, S. M., Hawk, E. T.
(2009). Cancer Prevention: From 1727 to Milestones of the Past 100 Years. Cancer Res.
69: 5269-5284
[Abstract][Full Text]
Stepanov, I., Upadhyaya, P., Carmella, S. G., Feuer, R., Jensen, J., Hatsukami, D. K., Hecht, S. S.
(2008). Extensive Metabolic Activation of the Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-Pyridyl)-1-Butanone in Smokers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
17: 1764-1773
[Abstract][Full Text]
Vineis, P., Perera, F.
(2008). Molecular Epidemiology and Biomarkers in Etiologic Cancer Research: The New in Light of the Old. aacredbook
2008: 547-567
[Abstract][Full Text]
Vineis, P., Perera, F.
(2007). Molecular Epidemiology and Biomarkers in Etiologic Cancer Research: The New in Light of the Old. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
16: 1954-1965
[Abstract][Full Text]
Stark, M. J., Rohde, K., Maher, J. E., Pizacani, B. A., Dent, C. W., Bard, R., Carmella, S. G., Benoit, A. R., Thomson, N. M., Hecht, S. S.
(2007). The Impact of Clean Indoor Air Exemptions and Preemption Policies on the Prevalence of a Tobacco-Specific Lung Carcinogen Among Nonsmoking Bar and Restaurant Workers. AJPH
97: 1457-1463
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gallagher, C. J., Muscat, J. E., Hicks, A. N., Zheng, Y., Dyer, A.-M., Chase, G. A., Richie, J., Lazarus, P.
(2007). The UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 Gene Deletion Polymorphism: Sex-Specific Association with Urinary 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-Pyridyl)-1-Butanol Glucuronidation Phenotype and Risk for Lung Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
16: 823-828
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tulunay, O. E., Hecht, S. S., Carmella, S. G., Zhang, Y., Lemmonds, C., Murphy, S., Hatsukami, D. K.
(2005). Urinary Metabolites of a Tobacco-Specific Lung Carcinogen in Nonsmoking Hospitality Workers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
14: 1283-1286
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hecht, S S
(2004). Carcinogen derived biomarkers: applications in studies of human exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke. Tobacco Control
13: i48-56
[Abstract][Full Text]
Anderson, K. E., Kliris, J., Murphy, L., Carmella, S. G., Han, S., Link, C., Bliss, R. L., Puumala, S., Murphy, S. E., Hecht, S. S.
(2003). Metabolites of a Tobacco-Specific Lung Carcinogen in Nonsmoking Casino Patrons. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
12: 1544-1546
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fields, N, Chapman, S
(2003). Chasing Ernst L Wynder: 40 years of Philip Morris' efforts to influence a leading scientist. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
57: 571-578
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tang, H., Cowling, D. W., Lloyd, J. C., Rogers, T., Koumjian, K. L., Stevens, C. M., Bal, D. G.
(2003). Changes of Attitudes and Patronage Behaviors in Response to a Smoke-Free Bar Law. AJPH
93: 611-617
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hecht, S. S.
(2002). Human urinary carcinogen metabolites: biomarkers for investigating tobacco and cancer. Carcinogenesis
23: 907-922
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hecht, S. S., Ye, M., Carmella, S. G., Fredrickson, A., Adgate, J. L., Greaves, I. A., Church, T. R., Ryan, A. D., Mongin, S. J., Sexton, K.
(2001). Metabolites of a Tobacco-specific Lung Carcinogen in the Urine of Elementary School-aged Children. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
10: 1109-1116
[Abstract][Full Text]
Anderson, K. E., Carmella, S. G., Ye, M., Bliss, R. L., Le, C., Murphy, L., Hecht, S. S.
(2001). Metabolites of a Tobacco-Specific Lung Carcinogen in Nonsmoking Women Exposed to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
93: 378-381
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ren, Q., Murphy, S. E., Zheng, Z., Lazarus, P.
(2000). O-Glucuronidation of the Lung Carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1- (3-Pyridyl)-1-Butanol (nnal) by Human Udp-Glucuronosyltransferases 2b7 and 1a9. Drug Metab. Dispos.
28: 1352-1360
[Abstract][Full Text]
Husgafvel-Pursiainen, K., Boffetta, P., Kannio, A., Nyberg, F., Pershagen, G., Mukeria, A., Constantinescu, V., Fortes, C., Benhamou, S.
(2000). p53 Mutations and Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in a Multicenter Study on Lung Cancer. Cancer Res.
60: 2906-2911
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ren, Q., Murphy, S. E., Dannenberg, A. J., Park, J. Y., Tephly, T. R., Lazarus, P.
(1999). Glucuronidation of the Lung Carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) by Rat UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B1. Drug Metab. Dispos.
27: 1010-1016
[Abstract][Full Text]
Upadhyaya, P., Kenney, P. M.J., Hochalter, J. B., Wang, M., Hecht, S. S.
(1999). Tumorigenicity and metabolism of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol enantiomers and metabolites in the A/J mouse. Carcinogenesis
20: 1577-1582
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hecht, S. S.
(1999). Tobacco Smoke Carcinogens and Lung Cancer. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
91: 1194-1210
[Abstract][Full Text]
Meger, M., Richter, E., Zwickenpflug, W., Oehlmann, C., Hargaden, M. B., A-Rahim, Y. I., Vesell, E. S.
(1999). Metabolism and Disposition of 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-Pyridyl)-1-Butanone (NNK) in Rhesus Monkeys. Drug Metab. Dispos.
27: 471-478
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hackshaw, A K
(1998). Lung cancer and passive smoking. Stat Methods Med Res
7: 119-136
[Abstract]
Scherer, G., Richter, E.
(1997). Biomonitoring exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS): A critical reappraisal. Hum Exp Toxicol
16: 449-459
[Abstract]
Smith, G. D., Phillips, A. N
(1996). Passive smoking and health: should we believe Philip Morris's "experts"?. BMJ
313: 929-933
[Full Text]
Uberla, K., Hecht, S. S., Murphy, S. E., Hoffmann, D.
(1994). Tobacco-Specific Lung Carcinogen and Exposure to Passive Smoking. NEJM
330: 1016-1017
[Full Text]