FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 329:321-325 July 29, 1993 Number 5 Next

Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Health care costs in the United States exceed 14 percent of the gross domestic product, far more than in any other nation. Overall costs were $838 billion in 1992, or over $3,000 per person¹. Well over 30 million Americans are uninsured, partly because of rising premium costs^2,3. We propose an approach to part of this problem that has been neglected, one that focuses on systematically reducing the need and thus the demand for medical services. This approach requires expanding the definitions of "health promotion" and "preventive care," paying selective attention to strategies that have been found to result in net cost savings.

During the past 30 years, while health care expenditures have risen in the United States from 4 percent to 14 percent, many cost-control strategies have been tried to varying degrees, without success^4,5,6. The inflation of costs, influenced by technology, specialization, and a variety of other factors, has continued unabated⁶. Thoughtful criticisms of administrative cost-control solutions have been advanced, and it has been noted that these measures ration productive and nonproductive activities alike⁷. Despite their merits, proposed programs of reform introduce new problems, such as reduced access, increased costs, rationing, or adverse economic effects on small businesses^2,3,4,8,9,10. On the face of it, broadening access and reducing costs at the same time is difficult.

A Theoretical Solution -- Reducing the Need and Demand for Medical Services

If there were no illness and no accidents, health care costs for a society would theoretically be zero. For much of this century, the decrease in acute illness and the proportional increase in chronic disease have fueled inflation in medical costs¹¹. Preventing chronic illness would offer hope of a reduction in demand: if a coronary-artery bypass graft procedure costs $50,000, then avoiding that procedure could save up to $50,000, depending on the cost of the intervention, on whether the procedure is postponed or prevented, and other offsetting factors¹². Approaches involving self-management could potentially yield similar benefits: if a visit to the emergency department for a cold, including cultures, x-ray films, and antibiotics, costs $130, then that amount is saved if the visit is not made. If they are based on well-documented and proved interventions, health policies directed at reducing the burden of illness constitute a positive approach: individuals become healthy and society may save money^13,14.

How can we reduce the burden of illness and thus the need and demand for medical services? Ideally, a society of healthy people does not smoke, does not consume alcohol to excess, exercises regularly, eats wisely, uses seat belts, treats hypertension, provides other preventive health services, and sees that care at the end of life is humane¹⁵. People assume more responsibility for their own health by requesting health services when such services can be of help and avoiding them when they cannot. There is emphasis on both disease prevention and collective individual restraint. To be sure, there are offsetting factors involving cost as well, including the direct and indirect costs of the interventions themselves. With programs of early detection (screening) in particular, it has been notoriously difficult to document cost savings¹⁶. The same can be said of drug treatment for control of hypertension or reduction in cholesterol levels^17,18,19. Not all "preventive" interventions save money.

We believe one requirement is broad access to wisely designed programs of health promotion, in which the concept of health promotion is expanded to include a goal of cost reduction. This expanded concept directly addresses the challenge of preventing illness as well as that of reducing health care costs.

The Potential for Reducing Demand

A health policy directed at reducing demand would be unlikely to make a major contribution to lowering costs if a number of conditions were not present: if preventable illness made up only a small fraction of the demand, if risky behavior were not expensive in terms of lifetime medical costs, if approaches involving self-management did not reduce costs, if the present system already linked the use of resources closely to the requirements of illness, or if health-promotion programs in the workplace increased overall health care costs.

Much Disease Is Preventable

Preventable illness makes up approximately 70 percent of the burden of illness and the associated costs. Well-developed national statistics such as those outlined in Healthy People 2000, Health U.S. 1991, and elsewhere document this central fact clearly^1,15,20,21. McGinnis and Foege have carefully reclassified the causes of death in the United States, using underlying actual causes rather than the traditional disease-oriented classifications; they found that preventable causes account for eight of the nine leading categories and for 980,000 deaths per year. (McGinnis JM, Foege WH: personal communication).

Risky Behavior Costs Money

Lifetime medical costs, which average approximately $225,000 per person, are clearly linked to health habits^22,23,24. For example, the lifetime costs for smokers, despite their shorter lives, are higher than those for nonsmokers^22,25 by approximately one third^20,22. Breslow and Breslow²³ have demonstrated that poor health habits are strongly associated with greater burdens of illness and that these effects are similar in magnitude to the effects on mortality. Yen et al.²⁶. showed that self-reported health habits strongly predicted annual claims costs over the next three years; people at low risk had average claims of $190, whereas those at high risk had claims averaging $1,550. Using cross-sectional data from the National Health Interview Survey, Wetzler and Cruess found that increased physical activity was associated with fewer visits to the doctor²⁷. Tsai et al. confirmed statistically significant associations between smoking habits and overall morbidity; overall morbidity was higher by 60 percent among smokers²⁸. Sokolov demonstrated that in a large corporate setting, people with three or more risk factors on a list that included smoking, obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes had claims costs that were double those of people who had no risk factors^29,30.

Variability in Regional Costs Implies Slack in the System

Wennberg and others have documented striking regional differences in the use of services^31,32. Cesarean-section rates in the United States have risen from 5 percent in 1965 to over 25 percent in 1988; moreover, current rates range from 9.6 to 31.8 percent in different settings³³. Hospital expenditures per capita are twice as high in Boston as in New Haven. In some communities in Maine, over 50 percent of men undergo prostatectomy, as compared with only 15 percent in nearby communities, yet the health outcomes in these men appear similar^31,32,34. In the case of elective hospitalizations, admission rates correlate with the number of hospital beds per capita rather than the incidence of illness^35,36. Educating the consumer so that more informed decisions are made decreases the frequency with which certain procedures are performed^31,32. When patients are given information and alternatives, they have been shown, on average, to select less invasive (and less expensive) strategies than their physicians³². Health maintenance organizations cost as much as 20 percent less than traditional programs of health care delivery, with no discernible negative effects on health outcomes³⁷.

Self-Management Can Result in Savings

Multiple studies have demonstrated that providing medical consumers with information and guidelines about self-management can lower rates of use of services, often by 7 to 17 percent, in association with modest interventions^{37,38,39,40,41}. These interventions offer objective guidelines to help a person decide whether medical assistance is required for a particular problem and provide information about home treatment when appropriate. They appear to work through two mechanisms: better information and increased confidence that much illness can be self-limited. Education that increases confidence about health decisions has been shown to reduce the costs of long-term health care, even in people with chronic disease^42,43.

Care for Terminal Illness Has Become Extraordinarily Expensive and Inhumane

The costs of medical care in the last year of life are high, and a portion of them represent overly intensive services in terminal illness⁴⁴. Some 18 percent of lifetime costs for medical care, or over $40,000, is estimated to be incurred in the last year,⁴⁵ and 29.4 percent of Medicare and Medicaid payments for those over the age of 65 are for people in the last year⁴⁶. Imminent death is not always predictable, but sometimes the reality is clear. Seventy percent of people request no life-sustaining treatments for themselves when they are dying, and 89 percent desire living wills and other advance directives. Yet only 9 percent have made such directives^47,48,49. Schneiderman and colleagues⁵⁰ point out that not only signed documents but also physician-patient communication is important if dying patients are to receive less unwanted care. Roos and colleagues have discussed the factors associated with expensive and inexpensive terminal care⁵¹.

Health Promotion at Work Has Successfully Reduced Costs

A growing literature documents the potential of well-formulated health-promotion programs to decrease health care costs in the workplace^{38,39,40,41,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69}. Multiple studies of such programs have shown substantial decreases in the number of sick days,^{52,53,54,56,59,60,65,68,69} outpatient costs,^{52,57,58,61,64,65,66,68,69} and hospitalization costs^{55,56,57,60,61,64,65,66,69}. Many of these studies have used randomized or parallel control groups in similar plants or facilities for soundness of the experimental^61,62,67or quasi-experimental^{53,55,59,63,69} design. Savings have frequently been confirmed by analyses of claims data^{60,61,62,65,67,69}.

A recent review of 28 separate studies of health promotion in the workplace emphasized the effects on documented cost reduction, with the savings generally being three or more times greater than the program costs⁶⁹. A low-cost intervention delivered by mail^61,62 had a higher percentage return. A well-executed study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health in Birmingham, Alabama, showed a 10-to-1 return and held costs to the city constant over a five-year period⁶⁷. Increasing collaboration by universities and corporations has substantially improved the quality of recent studies⁷⁰. There already are model programs that improve health and decrease costs. It is not knowledge that is lacking, but penetration of these programs into a greater number of settings.

Redefining Health Promotion

We propose that health-promotion programs attempt to improve both physical and financial health. The central goal remains improvement in health habits, and ultimately the postponement and prevention of major chronic illnesses require reduction in risk factors. Available data, however, suggest a lag of two or three years between improvement in health habits and signs of better health and reduced costs^12,71. Some studies have suggested that costs may even be increased during the first year of a program intended to improve health habits⁷².

There are, however, elements of a broadened health-promotion model that have the potential for more immediate savings. Materials on self-management that offer guidance in the appropriate use of services have been shown to produce savings in the first year,^38,39,40,41 particularly those that raise people's confidence in making health-related decisions⁴². Programs intended to improve a person's level of confidence in dealing with chronic illness have been shown to lower costs both immediately and over a four-year period⁴³. Interventions directed at reducing the number of low-birth-weight babies can theoretically have immediate effects: a stay in the intensive care unit for a single low-birth-weight baby can easily cost more than $100,000. Using advance directives, such as a living will or durable power of attorney, that emphasize humane and dignified care at the end of life and are coupled with appropriate communication could reduce costs as well as provide more humane care in a short period^47,48,49. Dollar incentives for the appropriate use of health care, a measure sure to be controversial, may yet play a part in reducing costs and may do so over a brief period^29,30,67,72.

Who Will Pay?

Widespread dissemination of programs such as those described here costs money -- not a great deal of money in comparison with overall health costs, but some money. The costs should be borne by those who will ultimately have the savings -- that is, those now paying the costs. Insurers, industry, and government can pay out of their potential savings. What is required is a widespread conviction that appropriately designed programs directed at reducing need and demand can actually save money^13,14,69.

The Health Project

The Health Project is a voluntary consortium of business leaders, health insurers, policy scholars, and members of government, with representation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Office of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, and present and past administrations. Its members believe that reducing demand and need can have a substantial positive effect on health care costs. We propose a private-public partnership, with nominal federal expenditure, to promote improved health and reduce costs. The consortium believes that there already are programs capable of making a change in demand, but that except for demonstration projects, their availability now extends only to perhaps 1 or 2 percent of the population. Disseminating such programs is the issue.

The consortium plans to review the evidence, identify the best programs, and promote their replication in additional workplaces and communities. In an initial review of more than 200 health-promotion programs in the workplace, there was a convincing documentation of savings in 8: Johnson and Johnson,⁵⁵ Du Pont,⁵³ Tenneco,⁵² Blue Shield of California,^61,62 Travelers,^39,40 Southern California Edison,^29,30 the County of Ventura (California), and Coors⁵⁸. Collectively, these programs had developed many of the features that influence costs directly over the short term. Two had a heavy emphasis on self-management, two used cost incentives, one emphasized advance directives for terminal care, several contained elements directed at enhancing self-confidence with regard to health-related decisions, and several had defined approaches to people at high risk.

Problems and Caveats

Why have solutions aimed at reducing costs by reducing demand not been implemented more widely? Two common answers are the popular belief that high costs are necessary if we are to have the finest medical system in the world and the idea that technology is essential to improved health and longevity. Economists have focused on administrative and financing issues. Across-the-board solutions have been sought, rather than selective ones, partly because they are easier to conceptualize. Advocates of health promotion have themselves caused delays, first by not making cost reduction a primary goal and second by neglecting rigorous economic evaluation. The government has not funded evaluative research to any substantial degree. It can be argued that academic conservatism has held preventive policy to a more stringent standard of proof than that generally applied in other areas of health policy.

In addition, there has been the suggestion that health-promotion programs might actually increase costs or that at best the reductions would be small^73,74,75,76. Smoking cessation, for example, might increase costs by promoting greater longevity with its attendant costs. Furthermore, proposals to teach people to use hospitals and doctors less can be seen as raising another kind of barrier to access, even though the intention is quite different. Health-promotion programs have also been viewed as intrusive and as jeopardizing privacy. There has been doubt that large segments of the population can learn to practice self-management. Concern that powerful interest groups (doctors, hospitals, industry, or the medical-industrial complex) will effectively oppose such approaches has engendered a sense of hopelessness.

In the end, however, the payers are consumers, who can learn to act in their own interests to control costs and who ultimately constitute the strongest interest group⁷⁷. Moreover, the proposals outlined here are not antimedicine; rather, they are in the tradition of a profession devoted to improving health. Ultimately, a service profession must applaud this initiative, and many if not most physicians already support these strategies. It is time to confront concern directly about whether efforts to reduce need and demand can be of real value. The evidence is that they can.

Conclusions

Reducing the need and demand for medical services is theoretically plausible and practically documented, and there is a funding mechanism in place, through the savings accruing to the present payers. The approach complements multiple proposals for the reform of health care financing that are now under consideration, and indeed it is essential to any such plan, for all face the question of costs. The Health Project Consortium believes that widespread implementation requires ever broader collaboration among business, labor, the insurance industry, government, and the university. This approach does not directly address many other important issues in medical reform, including access, overspecialization, and the development of a two-tiered system, although it may provide indirect help in some of these areas. Nor does it, as now conceived, adequately address the issues of health promotion and reduction of demand for services as they affect the unemployed, the uninsured, and the poor; to the extent that it can free funds, however, it may provide benefits for them. Reducing the need and demand for medical services is a positive solution, one that will bring better health for the individual, and that will ultimately lower medical costs.

We are indebted to Lester Breslow, Robert Cihak, Milton Friedman, Sarah Tilton-Fries, Victor Fuchs, Halsted Holman, Paul Leigh, Deborah Lubeck, Harold Luft, and Kenneth R. Pelletier for critical review and suggestions.

Source Information

From Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (J.F.F.); C. Everett Koop Institute, Hanover, N.H. (C.E.K.); William M. Mercer, New York (C.E.B.); Prudential Insurance Company, Newark, N.J. (P.P.C.); Washington Business Group on Health, Washington, D.(M.J.E.); Health Net, Woodland Hills, Calif. (R.F.G.); Sokolov Strategic Alliance, Los Angeles (J.J.S.); and the Tau Group, New York (D.W.). In addition to the study authors, the following persons are members of the Health Project Consortium: Charles B. Arnold, M.D., Metlife; Charles R. Buck, Jr., Sc.D., General Electric; Bruce Fried, Clinton Transition Team; Ron Hartwig, Hill and Knowlton; James Harrell, Dept. of Health and Human Services; Karen Ignagni, AFL-CIO; Dorothea R. Johnson, M.D., AT&T; Johannes Kuttner, the White House; James Marks, M.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Richard F. O'Brien, General Motors; Robert E. Patricelli, Value Health; Roger B. Porter, M.D., Office of Policy Development, the White House; Dallas L. Salisbury, Employee Benefit Research Institute; Jack Shelton, Ford Motor Company; John F. Troy, the Travelers Insurance Companies; and Reed Tuckson, M.D., Charles R. Drew University.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Fries at 1000 Welch Rd., Suite 203, Palo Alto, CA 94304.

References

1. National Center for Health Statistics. Health United States, 1991. Hyattsville, Md.: Public Health Service, 1992. (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 92-1232.) 
2. Sullivan LW. The Bush administration's health care plan. N Engl J Med 1992;327:801-804. [Medline]
3. Clinton B. The Clinton health care plan. N Engl J Med 1992;327:804-807. [Medline]
4. Schroeder SA, Cantor JC. On squeezing balloons -- cost control fails again. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1099-1100. [Medline]
5. Ginzberg E. Health care reform -- where are we and where should we be going? N Engl J Med 1992;327:1310-1312. [Medline]
6. Weisbrod BA. The health care quadrilemma: an essay on technological change, insurance, quality of care, and cost containment. J Econ Lit 1991;29:523-552. 
7. Welch HG. Should the health care forest be selectively thinned by physicians or clear cut by payers? Ann Intern Med 1991;115:223-226.
8. Reinhardt UE. Politics and the health care system. N Engl J Med 1992;327:809-811. [Medline]
9. Brown ER. Health USA: a national health program for the United States. JAMA 1992;267:552-558. [Abstract]
10. Simmons HE, Rhoades MM, Goldberg MA. Comprehensive health care reform and managed competition. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1525-1528. [Medline]
11. Fries JF, Crapo LM. Vitality and aging. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1981.
12. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
13. Somers AR. Why not try preventing illness as a way of controlling Medicare costs? N Engl J Med 1984;311:853-856. [Medline]
14. Leaf A. Preventive medicine for our ailing health care system. JAMA 1993;269:616-618. [CrossRef][Medline]
15. Healthy People 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1991. (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 91-50213.)
16. Eddy DM. Screening for cervical cancer. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:214-226.
17. Hulley SB, Walsh JMB, Newman TB. Health policy on blood cholesterol: time to change directions. Circulation 1992;86:1026-1029. [Free Full Text]
18. Edelson JT, Weinstein MC, Tosteson ANA, Williams L, Lee TH, Goldman L. Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension. JAMA 1990;263:407-413. [Abstract]
19. Goldman L, Weinstein MC, Goldman PA, Williams LW. Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. JAMA 1991;265:1145-1151. [Abstract]
20. Department of Health and Human Services. Prevention 89/90: federal programs and progress. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1990.
21. McGinnis JM. Investing in health: the role of disease prevention. In: Blank RH, Bonnicksen AL, eds. Emerging issues in biomedical policy: an annual review. Vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992:13-26.
22. Leigh JP. Fries JF. Health habits, health care use and costs in a sample of retirees. Inquiry 1992;29:44-54. [Medline]
23. Breslow L, Breslow N. Health practices and disability: some evidence from Alameda County. Prev Med 1993;22:86-95. [CrossRef][Medline]
24. Manning WG, Keeler EB, Newhouse JP, Sloss EM, Wassermann J. The costs of poor health habits. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991:223.
25. Hodgson TA. Cigarette smoking and lifetime medical expenditures. Milbank Q 1992;70:81-125. [CrossRef][Medline]
26. Yen LT, Edington DW, Witting P. Associations between health risk appraisal scores and employee medical claims costs in a manufacturing company. Am J Health Promot 1991;6:46-54. [Medline]
27. Wetzler HP, Cruess DF. Self-reported physical health practices and health care utilization: findings from the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health 1985;75:1329-1330. [Free Full Text]
28. Tsai SP, Cowles SR, Ross CE. Smoking and morbidity frequency in a working population. J Occup Med 1990;32:245-249. [CrossRef][Medline]
29. Sokolov JJ. National health care reform: a corporate perspective. Compens Benefits Manage 1992;Spring:1-6.
30. Sokolov JJ. Building a prototype for the nineties. Healthc Inform 1992;:36-42.
31. Wennberg JE, Mulley AG Jr, Hanley D, et al. An assessment of prostatectomy for benign urinary tract obstruction: geographic variations and the evaluation of medical care outcomes. JAMA 1988;259:3027-3030. [CrossRef][Medline]
32. Wennberg JE. Outcomes research, cost containment, and the fear of health care rationing. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1202-1204. [Medline]
33. Goyert GL, Bottoms SF, Treadwell MC, Nehra PC. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates. N Engl J Med 1989;320:706-709. [Abstract]
34. Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Culp WJ. Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilised in Boston? Lancet 1987;1:1185-1189. [CrossRef][Medline]
35. Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Shelton RM, Bubolz TA. Hospital use and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. N Engl J Med 1989;321:1168-1173. [Abstract]
36. Wennberg JE. Population illness rates do not explain population hospitalization rates: a comment on Mark Blumberg's thesis that morbidity adjusters are needed to interpret small area variations. Med Care 1987;25:354-359. [CrossRef][Medline]
37. Morrison EM, Luft HS. Health maintenance organization environments in the 1980s and beyond. Health Care Financ Rev 1990;12:81-90. [Medline]
38. Lorig K, Kraines RG, Brown BW Jr, Richardson N. A workplace health education program that reduces outpatient visits. Med Care 1985;23:1044-1054. [CrossRef][Medline]
39. Vickery DM, Golaszewski TJ, Wright EC, Kalmer H. The effect of self-care interventions on the use of medical service within a Medicare population. Med Care 1988;26:580-588. [Medline]
40. Golaszewski T, Snow D, Lynch W, Yen L, Solomita D. A benefit-to-cost analysis of a work-site health promotion program. J Occup Med 1992;34:1164-1172. [Medline]
41. Vickery DM, Kalmer H, Lowry D, Constantine M, Wright E, Loren W. Effect of a self-care education program on medical visits. JAMA 1983;250:2952-2956. [Abstract]
42. Pelletier KR, Joss JE, Locke SE. Personal efficacy: a research data base for the clinical application of self-efficacy in mental health. In: In pursuit of wellness. Vol. 7. Sacramento: California Department of Mental Health, 1992.
43. Lorig KR, Mazonson PD, Holman HR. Evidence suggesting that health education for self-management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health care costs. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:439-446. [Medline]
44. Scitovsky AA. Medical care in the last twelve months of life: the relation between age, functional status, and medical care expenditures. Milbank Q 1988;66:640-660. [CrossRef][Medline]
45. Fuchs VR. "Though much is taken": reflections on aging, health, and medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1984;62:143-166. [Medline]
46. Temkin-Greener H, Meiners MR, Petty EA, Szydlowski JS. The use and cost of health services prior to death: a comparison of the Medicare-only and the Medicare-Medicaid elderly populations. Milbank Q 1992;70:679-701. [CrossRef][Medline]
47. Greco PJ, Schulman KA, Lavizzo-Mourey R, Hansen-Flaschen J. The Patient Self-Determination Act and the future of advance directives. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:639-643.
48. Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care -- a case for greater use. N Engl J Med 1991;324:889-895. [Abstract]
49. Podrid PJ. Resuscitation in the elderly: a blessing or a curse? Ann Intern Med 1989;111:193-195.
50. Schneiderman LJ, Kronick R, Kaplan RM, Anderson JP, Langer RD. Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatments and costs. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:599-606.
51. Roos NP, Shapiro E, Tate R. Does a small majority of elderly account for a majority of health care expenditures? A sixteen-year perspective. Milbank Q 1989;67:347-369. [CrossRef][Medline]
52. Baun WB, Bernacki EJ, Tsai SP. A preliminary investigation: effect of a corporate fitness program on absenteeism and health care cost. J Occup Med 1986;28:18-22. [CrossRef][Medline]
53. Bertera RL. The effects of workplace health promotion on absenteeism and employee costs in a large industrial population. Am J Public Health 1990;80:1101-1105. [Free Full Text]
54. Blair SN, Smith M, Collingwood TR, Reynolds R, Prentice MC, Sterling CL. Health promotion for educators: impact on absenteeism. Prev Med 1986;15:166-175. [CrossRef][Medline]
55. Bly J, Jones RC, Richardson JE. Impact of worksite health promotion on health care costs and utilization: evaluation of Johnson & Johnson's Live for Life program. JAMA 1986;256:3235-3240. [Abstract]
56. Bowne D, Russell ML, Morgan JL, Optenberg SA, Clarke AE. Reduced disability and health care costs in an industrial fitness program. J Occup Med 1984;26:809-816. [CrossRef][Medline]
57. Gibbs JO, Mulvaney D, Henes C, Reed RW. Work-site health promotion: five-year trend in employee health care costs. J Occup Med 1985;27:826-830. [CrossRef][Medline]
58. Henritze J, Brammell H. Phase II: cardiac wellness at the Adolph Coors Company. Am J Health Promot 1989;4:25-31. 
59. Jones RC, Bly JL, Richardson JE. A study of a work site health promotion program and absenteeism. J Occup Med 1990;32:95-99. [Medline]
60. Jose W, Anderson D, Haight S. The StayWell strategy for health care cost containment. In: Opatz J, ed. Health promotion evaluation: measuring the organizational impact. Stevens Point, Wis.: National Wellness Institute, 1987:15-34.
61. Leigh JP, Richardson N, Beck R, et al. Randomized controlled study of a retiree health promotion program: the Bank of America study. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1201-1206. [Abstract]
62. Fries JF, Bloch DA, Harrington H, Richardson N, Beck R. Two-year results of a randomized controlled trial of a health promotion program in a retiree population: the Bank of America study. Am J Med 1993;94:455-462. [CrossRef][Medline]
63. Lynch WD, Golaszewski TJ, Clearie AF, Snow D, Vickery DM. Impact of a facility-based corporate fitness program on the number of absences from work due to illness. J Occup Med 1990;32:9-12. [CrossRef][Medline]
64. Shephard RJ, Corey P, Renzland P, Cox M. The influence of an employee fitness program and lifestyle modification program upon medical care costs. Can J Public Health 1982;73:259-263. [Medline]
65. Steffy BD, Jones JW, Murphy LR, Kunz L. A demonstration of the impact of stress abatement programs on reducing employees' accidents and their costs. Am J Health Promot 1986;2:25-32.
66. Tsai SP, Bernacki EJ, Baun WB. Injury prevalence and associated costs among participants of an employee fitness program. Prev Med 1988;17:475-482. [CrossRef][Medline]
67. Harvey MR, Whitmer RW, Hilyer JC, Brown KC. The impact of a comprehensive medical benefit cost management program for the city of Birmingham: results at five years. Am J Health Promot 1993;7:296-303. [Medline]
68. Burton WN, Conti DJ. Value-managed mental health benefits. J Occup Med 1991;33:311-313. [Medline]
69. Pelletier K. A review and analysis of the health and cost-effective outcome studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention programs. Am J Health Promot 1991;5:311-315. [Medline]
70. Pelletier KR, Klehr NL, McPhee SJ. Developing workplace health promotion programs through university and corporate collaboration. Am J Health Promot 1988;2:75-81. [Medline]
71. Lipid Research Clinics Program. The Lipid Research Clinics coronary primary prevention trial results. II. The relationship of reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering. JAMA 1984;251:365-374. [Abstract]
72. Gibbs J, Mulvaney D, Henes C, Reed WR. Worksite health promotion: five year trend in employee health care costs. J Occup Med 1985;27:826-830.
73. Verbrugge LM. Longer life but worsening health? Trends in health and mortality of middle-aged and older persons. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1984;62:475-519. [CrossRef][Medline]
74. Schneider EL, Brody JA. Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity: another view. N Engl J Med 1983;309:854-856. [Medline]
75. Warner KE, Wickizer TM, Wolfe RA, Schildroth JE, Samuelson MH. Economic implications of workplace health promotion programs: review of the literature. J Occup Med 1988;30:106-112. [Medline]
76. Russell LB. Is prevention better than cure? Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1986.
77. Vickery DM, Fries JF. Take care of yourself. 5th ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1993.

Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wang, B. W. E., Ramey, D. R., Schettler, J. D., Hubert, H. B., Fries, J. F. (2002). Postponed Development of Disability in Elderly Runners: A 13-Year Longitudinal Study. Arch Intern Med 162: 2285-2294 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• LUCE, J. M., RUBENFELD, G. D. (2002). Can Health Care Costs Be Reduced by Limiting Intensive Care at the End of Life?. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 165: 750-754 [Full Text]  
• Girard, F., Guillemin, F., Novella, J. L., Valckenaere, I., Krzanowska, K., Vitry, F., Vittecoq, O., Eschard, J. P., Blanchard, F., Le Loet, X. (2002). Health-care use by rheumatoid arthritis patients compared with non-arthritic subjects. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41: 167-175 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Riley, B. L., Taylor, S. M., Elliott, S. J. (2001). Determinants of implementing heart health promotion activities in Ontario public health units: a social ecological perspective. Health Educ Res 16: 425-441 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Izumi, Y., Tsuji, I., Ohkubo, T., Kuwahara, A., Nishino, Y., Hisamichi, S. (2001). Impact of smoking habit on medical care use and its costs: a prospective observation of National Health Insurance beneficiaries in Japan. Int J Epidemiol 30: 616-621 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weingarten, S. (1999). Using Practice Guideline Compendiums To Provide Better Preventive Care. ANN INTERN MED 130: 454-458 [Full Text]  
• Robinson, T. N., Patrick, K., Eng, T. R., Gustafson, D., for the Science Panel on Interactive Communication, (1998). An Evidence-Based Approach to Interactive Health Communication: A Challenge to Medicine in the Information Age. JAMA 280: 1264-1269 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Emanuel, E. J., Battin, M. P. (1998). What Are the Potential Cost Savings from Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide?. NEJM 339: 167-172 [Full Text]  
• Vita, A. J., Terry, R. B., Hubert, H. B., Fries, J. F. (1998). Aging, Health Risks, and Cumulative Disability. NEJM 338: 1035-1041 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Loewy, E. H. (1998). Ethical Considerations in Executing and Implementing Advance Directives. Arch Intern Med 158: 321-324 [Full Text]  
• Bonneux, L., Barendregt, J. J, Nusselder, W. J, Van der Maas, P. J (1998). Preventing fatal diseases increases healthcare costs: cause elimination life table approach. BMJ 316: 26-29 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Light, D. W. (1997). The Rhetorics and Realities of Community Health Care: The Limits of Countervailing Powers toMeet the Health Care Needs of the Twenty-first Century. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 22: 105-145 [Abstract]  
• Kovach, C. R., Wilson, S. A., Noonan, P. E. (1996). The effects of hospice interventions on behaviors, discomfort, and physical complications of end stage dementia nursing home residents. AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMEN 11: 7-15 [Abstract]  
• Stokols, D., Pelletier, K. R., Fielding, J. E. (1996). The Ecology of Work and Health: Research and Policy Directions for the Promotion of Employee Health. Health Educ Behav 23: 137-158 [Abstract]  
• Corson, J. D., Mohan, C. R., Hoballah, J. J., Sharp, W. J., Kresowik, T. F. (1996). Atherosclerosis and Risk Factor Modification: Does It Really Make a Difference?. PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 9: 75-94  
• Reid, D. (1996). How effective is health education via mass communications?. Health Education Journal 55: 332-344  
• Schneider, R. H., Staggers, F., Alexander, C. N., Sheppard, W., Rainforth, M., Kondwani, K., Smith, S., King, C. G. (1995). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Stress Reduction for Hypertension in Older African Americans. Hypertension 26: 820-827 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jorgensen, C. M. (1994). Health Education: What Can It Look Like after Health Care Reform? 1993 SOPHE Presidential Address. Health Educ Behav 21: 11-26 [Abstract]  
• Glusker, P. (1994). Thoughts on the Clinton Health Plan. ANN INTERN MED 120: 622-622 [Full Text]  
• Emanuel, E. J., Emanuel, L. L. (1994). The Economics of Dying -- The Illusion of Cost Savings at the End of Life. NEJM 330: 540-544 [Full Text]  
• Russell, L. B. (1993). The Role of Prevention in Health Reform. NEJM 329: 352-354 [Full Text]