The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:907-912 March 31, 1994 Number 13
NextNext

The Human Costs of Tobacco Use— First of Two Parts
Carl E. Bartecchi, Thomas D. MacKenzie, and Robert W. Schrier

 

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by MacKenzie, T. D.
-PubMed Citation
It has been 30 years since the surgeon general of the United States released the first report of the Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health. In each of the subsequent reports, cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity and premature mortality in the United States. A total of 418,690 deaths in the United States were attributed to smoking in 19901. That figure included approximately twice as many male as female smokers. Of the 2,148,000 U.S. residents who died in 1990, approximately half died of particular preventable causes2 (Table 1). The prominence of tobacco as a contributor to mortality prompted former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop to state that cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable premature death in our society and the most important public health issue of our time3.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Deaths from Preventable Causes in the United States in 1990.

 
The importance of focusing on cigarette smoking in 1994 has recently been underscored by data showing that the prevalence of smoking among adults in the United States, which had been declining annually since 1973, was unchanged at 25.7 percent from 1990 to 19914. This occurred despite increasing evidence associating smoking with disease and death.

The Human Costs of Tobacco Use

Currently 46.3 million adults (25.7 percent of the population) are smokers4. This includes 24 million men (28.1 percent of the total) and more than 22 million women (23.5 percent). The prevalence is highest among persons 25 to 44 years of age. The percentage of smokers who report that they are heavy smokers (20 or more cigarettes per day) has changed little, from 26.0 percent in 1974 to 27.1 percent in 19853.

In 1990 in the United States, smoking-related illnesses accounted for nearly one in five deaths and more than one quarter of all deaths among those 35 to 64 years of age5. A breakdown of the deaths due to various diseases attributable to cigarette smoking is shown in Table 2. Peto et al.6 have estimated that during the 1990s in developed countries, tobacco will cause approximately 30 percent of all deaths among those 35 to 69 years of age, making it the largest single cause of premature death in the developed world.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Deaths Attributed to Smoking in the United States in 1990.

 
Though the emphasis of this review will be on cigarettes, the hazards of other tobacco products should not be overlooked. Despite declining consumption of these products (Figure 1), they continue to play an important part in morbidity and mortality in this country3,8.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Trends in Per Capita Tobacco Consumption among Adults in the United States, According to Major Product Category, from 1890 to 1990.

To convert pounds to kilograms, multiply by 0.45. Reprinted from a National Institutes of Health publication7.

 
In viewing the problems and complications related to tobacco use, recognition of the contributions of passive smoking is increasing, as described in a 1992 report by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)9. Reports indicate that environmental tobacco smoke is composed of mainstream smoke exhaled by the smoker and sidestream smoke emitted from the burning tobacco between puffs9,10. Sidestream smoke is the main component of environmental tobacco smoke. The great majority of smoke emitted from a lit cigarette is sidestream smoke rather than smoke that is actively inhaled. Sidestream and mainstream smoke contain many of the same air contaminants. Sidestream smoke has more particles with smaller diameters, and these particles are therefore more likely to be deposited in the most distant regions of the lungs10. Environmental tobacco smoke is a major source of indoor-air contaminants, and thus some unintentional inhalation by nonsmokers is virtually unavoidable. Since there appears to be no evidence of a safe threshold level, nonsmokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke appear to be at increased risk for the same problems and complications recognized in smokers. Environmental tobacco smoke has been classified as a known human lung carcinogen, or a "group A" carcinogen, under the EPA's system of carcinogen classification.

Cardiovascular Disease

A relation between cigarette smoking and coronary heart disease was reported by researchers at the Mayo Clinic in 194011. Since that time, it has been well documented that cigarette smoking substantially increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, including stroke, sudden death, heart attack, peripheral vascular disease, and aortic aneurysm3. In the United States in 1990, smoking caused 179,820 deaths from cardiovascular disease, accounting for 98,921 deaths from ischemic heart disease and 23,281 deaths from cerebrovascular diseases1. Actually, a 10.4 percent decline in deaths from cardiovascular disease was noted in 1990 as compared with 1988.

The Office of Technology Assessment estimates that nearly one fifth of deaths due to cardiovascular disease in 1990 were attributable to smoking5. In a study of British doctors, a strong dose-response relation was observed between the duration and extent of smoking and the death rate from ischemic heart disease among men younger than 65 years12. Similar trends have been found in studies of women who smoke. The Nurses' Health Study13 showed that women who smoked one to four cigarettes per day had a 2.5-fold increased risk of fatal coronary heart disease and nonfatal myocardial infarction.

Components of cigarette smoke have been shown to damage vascular endothelium,14 and endothelial injury is considered a primary antecedent to atherosclerosis14,15. The adverse effects of smoking are also related to its effects on coronary vaso-occlusive factors, such as platelet aggregation, vasomotor reactivity, and a prothrombotic state,16 and factors such as carbon monoxide production, increased plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen levels15. Smoking is a major risk factor for coronary vasospasm17. Smoking a single cigarette can cause profound silent disturbances in regional coronary blood flow in patients with angina and coronary artery disease18. A study19 using ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring detected 33 percent more episodes of ischemia per day and a significantly longer duration of ischemia in smoking as compared with nonsmoking patients with coronary heart disease. Cigarette smoking can also affect the vulnerability of the myocardium to ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest in patients with established coronary heart disease20.

Numerous studies21,22 have reported elevated total plasma cholesterol concentrations and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in smokers, with the degree of alteration being associated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day. There is also strong evidence that cigarette smoking increases the risk of stroke and that there is a dose-response relation23. Smokers have a risk of cerebrovascular disease that is 1.5 to 3 times that observed in nonsmokers21. A study24 of identical twins discordant for cigarette smoking found that the total area of carotid plaques was 2.3 times larger in the smoking twins than in their nonsmoking siblings. Studies21,25 have shown that quitting smoking can greatly reduce the incidence of cardiac disease and death from coronary heart disease.

Recent reviews26,27 outline the relation of passive smoking to heart disease. Of the estimated 53,000 deaths26 caused by passive smoking each year in the United States, 37,000 have been attributed to heart disease. Glantz and Parmley's analysis26 of 10 epidemiologic studies indicates a significant dose-response effect related to passive exposure and suggests that nonsmokers living with smokers have a 30 percent increase in the risk of death from ischemic heart disease or myocardial infarction. Patients with angina pectoris have a reduction of 20 to 40 percent in exercise capacity after exposure to environmental tobacco smoke28. Vasoconstriction from passively inhaled sidestream smoke is even more pronounced than that from mainstream smoke29. In addition, more carbon monoxide, with its potential to reduce the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood, is generated while a cigarette is smoldering than while it is being actively smoked10.

Cancer

In addition to being responsible for over 85 percent of lung cancers,3,30 smoking is also associated with cancers of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, uterine cervix, kidney, ureter, and bladder and accounts for about 30 percent of all deaths from cancer30,31. The overall rates of death from cancer are twice as high among smokers as among nonsmokers; heavier smokers have rates that are four times greater. Cigarette smoking is undoubtedly the most important preventable cause of cancer in the United States today.

Rosenow32 estimated that 175,000 new cases of lung cancer would occur in 1993. The rates of lung cancer have increased dramatically over the past 60 years in association with increases in the number of cigarettes smoked (Figure 2); there is no evidence of a threshold level of exposure. The EPA study9 points out that active smoking increases the risk of all four major histologic types of human lung cancer and estimates that environmental tobacco smoke is responsible for about 3000 deaths from lung cancer annually. The report9 also notes that condensates of mainstream smoke or sidestream smoke that are suspended in acetone and applied to the skin of mice for long periods cause papillomas or carcinomas at the site of application. The study concludes from these studies and from the fact that the risk of lung cancer increases with younger ages at the initiation of smoking and decreases with longer times since cessation of smoking that tobacco smoke has both tumor-initiating and tumor-promoting capabilities. It also concludes, from several different analyses, including that of Fontham et al.,34 that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke from spousal smoking is associated with increased mortality from lung cancer. A recent autopsy study35 of patients who died of causes other than respiratory diseases found an increase in "epithelial, possible precancerous lesions" in the lungs of nonsmoking women married to smokers. An important case-control study36 suggested that 17 percent of the cases of lung cancer among nonsmokers can be attributed to exposure to high levels of tobacco smoke during childhood and adolescence.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Cigarette Consumption and Total Deaths from Lung Cancer in the United States, 1900 to 1989.

Reprinted from a Department of Health and Human Services publication33.

 
It is estimated that 82 percent of laryngeal cancers are due to cigarette smoking3. The incidence of oral cancer among smokers ranges from 2 to 18 times that among people who have never smoked21. Oral cancers include cancers of the tongue, salivary gland, mouth, lip, and pharynx. About 93 percent of oral-cavity tumors in men and 61 percent of such cancers in women are related to tobacco use,3 the greatest risk being in tobacco users who regularly use alcohol37. The combination of smoking and alcohol use accounts for about three fourths of all oral and pharyngeal cancers38. Studies have also conclusively established the use of smokeless tobacco as a cause of oral cancer7,39. A recent monograph7 notes that 28 tumorigenic agents have been isolated and identified in smokeless-tobacco products and emphasizes that the nicotine in smokeless tobacco may also have a role as a potentiator in the carcinogenic process.

Of the estimated 10,200 deaths from cancer of the esophagus in 1993,30 about 80 percent can be attributed to cigarette smoking3. The use of alcohol again increases the risk of the development of this cancer. Newcomb and Carbone39 suggested that contact carcinogenesis is the most likely pathogenetic mechanism for this cancer. Smoke constituents condense on the mucous membranes of the mouth and pharynx and are then swallowed.

Cancers of the hematopoietic system have been linked to cigarette smoking21; for example, 14 percent of all leukemias may be due to smoking40. Cigarette smoke contains benzene, which has been linked with leukemia in the past. It has been suggested41 that a typical smoker inhales about 10 times as much benzene as a nonsmoker.

Cigarette smoking is thought to account for about 30 percent of the 13,500 new cases of cervical cancer estimated to have occurred in the United States in 199330,39. Studies42 have linked cancer of the cervix to exposure to both mainstream and sidestream smoke. Various materials found in tobacco smoke, some with mutagenic activity,43 can be found in the cervical mucus of smokers.

Lung Disease

Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of pulmonary illness and death in the United States3,44. In 1990, smoking caused 84,475 deaths from pulmonary disease, mainly due to such problems as pneumonia, influenza, bronchitis, emphysema, and chronic airway obstruction1. Chronic bronchitis and emphysema are the most important factors, according to a study11 of mortality rates among male British physicians. McCusker45 describes cigarette smoking as a chronic inflammatory disorder of the lower airways. Studies44,46 have shown a decline in pulmonary function in nonsmoking subjects with asthma after a controlled challenge of environmental tobacco smoke.

Children and Adolescents

An estimated47 6 million teenagers and another 100,000 youngsters under 13 years old smoke. Tobacco smoke creates major problems in early life and even in the fetus48. The damage induced by the toxins in cigarette smoke during those most vulnerable periods when the lung is undergoing growth and remodeling has important implications for later life9. A recent report48 noted that miscarriages of viable fetuses are increased in smokers and that babies born to mothers who smoke weigh an average of 200 g less than infants born to nonsmokers. Paternal smoking can also decrease birth weights in infants. The same report48 states that stillbirths and early neonatal deaths are increased by about 33 percent in the babies of smokers as compared with those of nonsmokers and that the effects of smoking in pregnancy extend well beyond infancy, with a reduction in growth and educational achievement.

Cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine, can be easily and accurately measured in saliva, blood, hair,49 and urine and serves as an indicator of exposure to tobacco smoke3 and smokeless tobacco7. A finding of cotinine in the fetus supports the presence of the constituents of cigarette smoke in the fetus and indicates the degree of exposure to these elements.

The EPA report9 also reviews studies claiming that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke is causally associated with an increased risk of lower respiratory tract infections such as bronchitis and pneumonia in children, causing 150,000 to 300,000 cases annually in infants and young children up to 18 months of age. It notes that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke is associated with an increased prevalence of fluid in the middle ear, symptoms of upper respiratory tract irritation, and a small but significant reduction in lung function. The report also points out that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke is associated with additional episodes of asthma and increased severity of symptoms in children with asthma. The EPA report estimates that the condition of 200,000 to 1 million children with asthma in this country is worsened by exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and that such exposure is a risk factor for new cases of asthma in children. Mothers who smoke 10 or more cigarettes a day can cause as many as 26,000 new cases of asthma among their children each year. The EPA report reviews studies showing that infants of mothers who smoke are at increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome during the first year of life.

Our society is becoming increasingly concerned about the numbers of young people who smoke or use smokeless tobacco. Very few people begin smoking after reaching adulthood. In the United States, approximately 80 to 90 percent of smokers begin smoking before the age of 21,3 and an estimated 3000 teenagers start smoking each day3,50. Teenage smokers smoke about 0.6 pack per day, or about 1.1 billion packs of cigarettes a year51.

Academic performance and the level of educational achievement52 have predictive value in determining whether a person will become a smoker. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported4 that in 1991 the prevalence of smoking ranged from 32 percent among the least educated to 13.6 percent among the most educated.

The health problems of children who smoke are summarized in the report48 of the Royal College of Physicians. In addition to the previously reviewed and the more obvious problems that would be expected from the early initiation and continuation of the smoking habit, the report noted that subarachnoid hemorrhage is six times more common in young smokers than in nonsmokers. Young people can be exposed to sidestream smoke and its serious consequences in multiple settings, such as in the home, in automobiles, at day care, at work, and unfortunately, even at school.

The use of smokeless tobacco, which includes both chewing tobacco and snuff, is increasing throughout the United States, especially among our most vulnerable population -- our children7. Along with other forms of tobacco, it is a strong contributor to the 29,800 new cases of oral cancer that were projected to occur in 199330. Surveys7 reveal that in 1988, 25.8 percent of boys between the ages of 12 and 17 had tried some form of smokeless tobacco. Although previously little use of smokeless tobacco was seen among adolescents, the prevalence of its use among older teens increased by 250 to 300 percent between 1970 and 198553. The problems associated with the use of smokeless tobacco reinforce the conclusion of the 1986 Report of the Surgeon General that "there is no safe form of tobacco use"10.

Women

As of 1991, 23.5 percent of women were reported to be smokers4. Fielding54 points out that today's female smokers are beginning at a younger age and are heavier smokers than in the past. The percentage of female smokers who smoke more than 25 cigarettes per day has almost doubled, from 13 percent in 1965 to 23 percent in 198555. More young women than young men smoke today, and this is especially notable among high-school seniors54. Also, in this time of declining prevalence of smoking, the rate of decline has been four times greater for men than for women and the rate of decline of smoking initiation among men was more than three times that observed for women56.

Lung cancer, which caused an estimated 56,000 deaths in 1993, has surpassed breast cancer, which caused an estimated 46,000 deaths, as the most important cause of death from cancer among women30. A study13 of more than 119,000 nurses, who were 30 to 55 years of age, over a six-year period confirmed the increased risk of fatal and nonfatal coronary events in female smokers. The heaviest smokers (more than 45 cigarettes per day) had 11 times the risk of women who had never smoked.

Women who take oral contraceptives and smoke are at considerably greater risk of dying of cardiovascular disease than are women who never use the pill or smoke57. Female smokers are at greater risk for postmenopausal osteoporosis; an antiestrogen effect of smoking has been postulated to explain this complication58,59. Fielding54 notes that smoking reduces fertility, increases the rate of spontaneous abortion, and increases the incidence of abruptio placentae, placenta previa, bleeding during pregnancy, and premature rupture of the placental membranes. These effects of smoking are thought to result in many thousands of preventable fetal and neonatal deaths60.

A study by Colditz et al.61 found evidence of a strong causal relation between cigarette smoking and stroke among young and middle-aged women. In that study, as compared with women who had never smoked, women who smoked 1 to 14 cigarettes per day had an age-adjusted relative risk of stroke of 2.2, whereas those who smoked 25 or more cigarettes per day had a relative risk of 3.7.

Minorities

In 1991, 31.4 percent of Native Americans and Alaska Natives, 29.2 percent of blacks (35.1 percent of black men), and 20.2 percent of Hispanics smoked4. The lowest rate -- 15.5 percent -- was among Hispanic women. One study33 showed that only 2.8 percent of Hispanics and 2.5 percent of blacks, as compared with 8.9 percent of whites, were likely to be heavy smokers (to smoke more than 25 cigarettes daily). The prevalence of smoking and the rates at which people began to smoke or quit smoking changed in a similar manner among blacks and whites from 1974 to 19853. More black and Hispanic men than black and Hispanic women begin to smoke during childhood and adolescence62.

Problems related to the high prevalence of smoking among black men are reflected in a 1993 report8 of age-adjusted death rates per 100,000 population for selected smoking-related cancers (those of the lung, oral cavity, and pharynx, esophagus, and larynx); in each case, black men had the highest death rate. An increased incidence of tobacco-related disease has been noted among Native Americans63. This increase was recognized in the mid-1970s to be due to the increase in daily cigarette smoking in this group.

The Elderly

In the U.S. population over the age of 65, it has been reported33 that the percentage of smokers is lowest among Hispanic women (10 percent) and highest among black men (31.1 percent). The same report pointed out that in the group over 65 years of age, 6.9 percent of the men used smokeless tobacco (snuff, chewing tobacco, or both). Oral cancers from smokeless tobacco typically occur in these men (median age at diagnosis, 62.4 years)7. A prospective study64 suggests that the hazards of smoking extend well into later life. Among men and women over 65 years of age, the rates of total mortality among current smokers were twice what they were among participants who had never smoked.

Strokes are an especially important problem for the elderly. Among those over the age of 65, 24 percent of cerebrovascular disease in men (6 percent in women) was attributable to smoking3,21. Another study65 suggests a causal relation between smoking and hypertension and subarachnoid hemorrhage, an especially disabling and lethal form of cerebrovascular disease.

Of concern to all smokers, young and old, are recent data66 that suggest a potential role of cigarette smoking in the development of cataracts. Studies suggest that about 20 percent of cataracts are attributable to smoking in the United States67.

Statistically, women in this country have lived longer than men in the 20th century68. Fielding54 notes that "the difference in longevity that leads so many women to survive their male contemporaries is being abridged by an increase in the number of women who fall victim to their most deleterious habit -- smoking."

We are indebted to Patricia Knox for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.


Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine (C.E.B., T.D.M., R.W.S.), and Denver Health and Hospitals (T.D.M.), both in Denver.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Schrier at C281, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 4200 E. 9th Ave., Denver, CO 80262.

References

  1. Cigarette smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost -- United States, 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1993;42:645-649. [Medline]
  2. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1993;270:2207-2212. [Free Full Text]
  3. Reducing the health consequences of smoking: 25 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General: executive summary. Rockville, Md.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1989. (DHHS publication no. (CDC) 89-8411).
  4. Cigarette smoking among adults -- United States, 1991. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1993;42:230-233. [Medline]
  5. Smoking-related deaths and financial costs: estimates for 1990. Rev. ed. Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment, 1993.
  6. Peto R, Lopez AD, Boreham J, Thun M, Heath C Jr. Mortality from tobacco in developed countries: indirect estimation from national vital statistics. Lancet 1992;339:1268-1278. [CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Smokeless tobacco or health: an international perspective. Rockville, Md.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1992. (NIH publication no. 92-3461).
  8. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T, Heath CW. Mortality trends for selected smoking-related cancers and breast cancer -- United States, 1950-1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1993;42:857, 863-857, 866. 
  9. Environmental Protection Agency. Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders. Washington, D.C.: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, 1992.
  10. The health consequences of involuntary smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1986. (DHHS publication no. (CDC) 87-8398).
  11. English JP, Willius FA, Berkson J. Tobacco and coronary disease. JAMA 1940;115:1327-1329. [Free Full Text]
  12. Doll R, Peto R. Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years observations on male British doctors. BMJ 1976;2:1525-1536.
  13. Willett WC, Green A, Stampfer MJ, et al. Relative and absolute excess risks of coronary heart disease among women who smoke cigarettes. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1303-1309. [Abstract]
  14. Krupski WC. The peripheral vascular consequences of smoking. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:291-304. [CrossRef][Medline]
  15. McBride PE. The health consequences of smoking: cardiovascular diseases. Med Clin North Am 1992;76:333-353. [Medline]
  16. Shah PK, Helfant RH. Smoking and coronary artery disease. Chest 1988;94:449-452. [Free Full Text]
  17. Sugiishi M, Takatsu F. Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for coronary spasm. Circulation 1993;87:76-79. [Free Full Text]
  18. Deanfield JE, Shea MJ, Wilson RA, Horlock P, de Landsheere CM, Selwyn AP. Direct effects of smoking on the heart: silent ischemic disturbances of coronary flow. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:1005-1009. [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Barry J, Mead K, Nabel EG, et al. Effect of smoking on the activity of ischemic heart disease. JAMA 1989;261:398-402. [Free Full Text]
  20. Hallstrom AP, Cobb LA, Ray R. Smoking as a risk factor for recurrence of sudden cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1986;314:271-275. [Abstract]
  21. The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1990. (DHHS publication no. (CDC) 90-8416).
  22. Muscat JE, Harris RE, Haley NJ, Wynder EL. Cigarette smoking and plasma cholesterol. Am Heart J 1991;121:141-147. [CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Shinton R, Beevers G. Meta-analysis of relation between cigarette smoking and stroke. BMJ 1989;298:789-794.
  24. Haapanen A, Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J, Kesaniemi YA, Heikkila K. Carotid arteriosclerosis in identical twins discordant for cigarette smoking. Circulation 1989;80:10-16. [Free Full Text]
  25. Frank E. Benefits of stopping smoking. West J Med 1993;159:83-86. [Medline]
  26. Glantz SA, Parmley WW. Passive smoking and heart disease: epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry. Circulation 1991;83:1-12. [Free Full Text]
  27. Steenland K. Passive smoking and the risk of heart disease. JAMA 1992;267:94-99. [Free Full Text]
  28. Aronow WS. Effect of passive smoking on angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 1978;299:21-24. [Abstract]
  29. Ohkubo C. Some acute cardiopulmonary effects of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke in man. Prev Med 1982;11:173-186. [CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Cancer facts & figures-1993. New York: American Cancer Society, 1993.
  31. The health consequences of smoking: cancer: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1982. (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 82-50179).
  32. Rosenow EC III. Symposium on intrathoracic neoplasms: introduction. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:168-169. 
  33. Smoking, tobacco and cancer program: 1985-1989 status report. Bethesda, Md.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1990. (NIH publication no. 90-3107).
  34. Fontham ETH, Correa P, WuWilliams A, et al. Lung cancer in nonsmoking women: a multicenter case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1991;1:35-43. [Abstract]
  35. Trichopoulos D, Mollo F, Tomatis L, et al. Active and passive smoking and pathological indicators of lung cancer risk in an autopsy study. JAMA 1992;268:1697-1701. [Free Full Text]
  36. Janerich DT, Thompson WD, Varela LR, et al. Lung cancer and exposure to tobacco smoke in the household. N Engl J Med 1990;323:632-636. [Abstract]
  37. Mecklenburg RE, Greenspan D, Kleinman DV, et al. Tobacco effects in the mouth: a National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Dental Research guide for health professionals. Washington, D.C.: National Cancer Institute, 1992. (NIH publication no. 92-3330).
  38. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Winn DM, et al. Smoking and drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res 1988;48:3282-3287. [Free Full Text]
  39. Newcomb PA, Carbone PP. The health consequences of smoking: cancer. Med Clin North Am 1992;76:305-331. [Medline]
  40. Brownson RC, Novotny TE, Perry MC. Cigarette smoking and adult leukemia: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:469-475. [Free Full Text]
  41. Wallace L, Pellizzari E, Hartwell TD, Perritt R, Ziegenfus R. Exposures to benzene and other volatile compounds from active and passive smoking. Arch Environ Health 1987;42:272-279. [Medline]
  42. Slattery ML, Robison LM, Schuman KL, et al. Cigarette smoking and exposure to passive smoke are risk factors for cervical cancer. JAMA 1989;261:1593-1598. [Free Full Text]
  43. Holly EA, Petrakis NL, Friend NF, Sarles DL, Lee RE, Flander LB. Mutagenic mucus in the cervix of smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1986;76:983-986.
  44. Sherman CB. The health consequences of cigarette smoking: pulmonary diseases. Med Clin North Am 1992;76:355-375. [Medline]
  45. McCusker K. Mechanisms of respiratory tissue injury from cigarette smoking. Am J Med 1992;93:Suppl 1A:18S-21S. [CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Menon P, Rando RJ, Stankus RP, Salvaggio JE, Lehrer SB. Passive cigarette smoke-challenge studies: increase in bronchial hyperreactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;89:560-566. [CrossRef][Medline]
  47. The health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1979.
  48. Royal College of Physicians. Smoking and the young. Tob Control 1992;1:231-235. 
  49. Klein J, Chitayat D, Koren G. Hair analysis as a marker for fetal exposure to maternal smoking. N Engl J Med 1993;328:66-67. [Free Full Text]
  50. Pierce JP, Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Hatziandreu EJ, Davis RM. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: projections to the year 2000. JAMA 1989;261:61-65. [Free Full Text]
  51. Glantz SA. Removing the incentive to sell kids tobacco: a proposal. JAMA 1993;269:793-794. [Free Full Text]
  52. Pierce JP, Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Hatziandreu EJ, Davis RM. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: educational differences are increasing. JAMA 1989;261:56-60. [Free Full Text]
  53. Marcus AC, Crane LA, Shopland DR, Lynn WR. Use of smokeless tobacco in the U.S.: recent estimates from the current population survey. NCI Monogr 1989;8:17-23.
  54. Fielding JE. Smoking and women: tragedy of the majority. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1343-1345. [Medline]
  55. Smoking and health, a national status report: a report to Congress. Rockville, Md.: Department of Health and Human Services, 1987. (DHHS publication no. (CDC) 87-8396).
  56. Fiore MC. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: the epidemiology of tobacco use. Med Clin North Am 1992;76:289-303. [Medline]
  57. Layde PM, Beral V. Further analyses of mortality in oral contraceptive users: Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study. Lancet 1981;1:541-546. [CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Hussey HH. Osteoporosis among women who smoke cigarettes. JAMA 1976;235:1367-1368. [Free Full Text]
  59. Baron JA. Smoking and estrogen-related disease. Am J Epidemiol 1984;119:9-22. [Free Full Text]
  60. McIntosh ID. Smoking and pregnancy: attributable risks and public health implications. Can J Public Health 1984;75:141-148. [Medline]
  61. Colditz GA, Bonita R, Stampfer MJ, et al. Cigarette smoking and risk of stroke in middle-aged women. N Engl J Med 1988;318:937-941. [Abstract]
  62. Escobedo LG, Anda RF, Smith PF, Remington PL, Mast EE. Sociodemographic characteristics of cigarette smoking initiation in the United States: implications for smoking prevention policy. JAMA 1990;264:1550-1555. [Free Full Text]
  63. Fairbanks LL. Tobacco related diseases among native Americans. N Y State J Med 1985;85:464-464. 
  64. LaCroix AZ, Lang J, Scherr P, et al. Smoking and mortality among older men and women in three communities. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1619-1625. [Abstract]
  65. Knekt P, Reunanen A, Aho K, et al. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage in a longitudinal population study. J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44:933-939. [CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Christen WG, Manson JE, Seddon JM, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of cataract in men. JAMA 1992;268:989-993. [Free Full Text]
  67. West S. Does smoke get in your eyes? JAMA 1992;268:1025-1026. [Free Full Text]
  68. Bureau of the Census. Historical statistics of the United States, colonial times to 1970. Bicentennial ed. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1975:55.

 

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by MacKenzie, T. D.
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

The Human Costs of Tobacco Use
Garcia-Rio F., Pino J. M., Villasante C., Katscher F., Bartecchi C. E., MacKenzie T. D., Schrier R. W.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 331:618, Sep 1, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.