The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:1703-1709 June 16, 1994 Number 24
NextNext

The Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in San Francisco -- A Population-Based Study Using Conventional and Molecular Methods
Peter M. Small, Philip C. Hopewell, Samir P. Singh, Antonio Paz, Julie Parsonnet, Delaney C. Ruston, Gisela F. Schecter, Charles L. Daley, and Gary K. Schoolnik

 

This Article
-Abstract

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The epidemiology of tuberculosis in urban populations is changing. Combining conventional epidemiologic techniques with DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can improve the understanding of how tuberculosis is transmitted.

Methods We used restriction-fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis to study M. tuberculosis isolates from all patients reported to the tuberculosis registry in San Francisco during 1991 and 1992. These results were interpreted along with clinical, demographic, and epidemiologic data. Patients infected with the same strains were identified according to their RFLP patterns, and patients with identical patterns were grouped in clusters. Risk factors for being in a cluster were analyzed.

Results Of 473 patients studied, 191 appeared to have active tuberculosis as a result of recent infection. Tracing of patients' contacts with the use of conventional methods identified links among only 10 percent of these patients. DNA fingerprinting, however, identified 44 clusters, 20 of which consisted of only 2 persons and the largest of which consisted of 30 persons. In patients under 60 years of age, Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio, 3.3; P = 0.02), black race (odds ratio, 2.3; P = 0.02), birth in the United States (odds ratio, 5.8; P<0.001), and a diagnosis of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (odds ratio, 1.8; P = 0.04) were independently associated with being in a cluster. Further study of patients in clusters confirmed that poorly compliant patients with infectious tuberculosis have a substantial adverse effect on the control of this disease.

Conclusions Despite an efficient tuberculosis-control program, nearly a third of new cases of tuberculosis in San Francisco are the result of recent infection. Few of these instances of transmission are identified by conventional contact tracing. .


Tuberculosis and its recent resurgence are predominantly urban phenomena in the United States, where case rates in large cities are almost two and a half times higher than the national average1. A combination of biologic and social factors has been postulated to account for this situation. In many cities, the number of persons who are immunosuppressed by infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis have increased in the face of deteriorating socioeconomic conditions and public systems of health care delivery2. As a result, important changes seem to have occurred in the patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission. In particular, the long-held assumption that only 10 percent of tuberculosis cases are the result of recent infection needs to be reconsidered3.

The combination of molecular fingerprinting of M. tuberculosis strains and conventional epidemiologic investigation has improved understanding of the transmission of tuberculosis. Molecular fingerprinting by restriction-fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis yields a unique, strain-specific pattern of bands (the "fingerprint") that is stable for at least two years4,5,6,7,8. Comparison of M. tuberculosis fingerprints from tuberculosis strains isolated during circumscribed outbreaks has demonstrated matching patterns among persons who were clearly infected from a common source4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. By showing that patients with no obvious epidemiologic relation are infected with the same strain, molecular fingerprinting has revealed that M. tuberculosis can be transmitted during brief contact between persons who do not live or work together18,20,21. Taken together, these studies suggest that patients with the same M. tuberculosis RFLP pattern constitute an epidemiologically linked cluster. Furthermore, because tuberculosis developed during a relatively short period in patients in a cluster, clustering indicates recent infection and rapid progression to clinical illness22.

We conducted a population-based molecular epidemiologic study of tuberculosis in San Francisco. In addition to providing an estimate of the incidence of tuberculosis that results from recently transmitted infection, we identified some of the risk factors for the transmission of M. tuberculosis. Our results suggest that current tuberculosis-control strategies have important limitations in contemporary urban environments.

Methods

Patient Identification and Routine Data Collection

The population studied included all patients with tuberculosis who were reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health, Division of Tuberculosis Control, between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1992. The routine demographic data collected included age, sex, race or ethnicity, country of birth, number of years of residency in the United States, and address at the time of diagnosis. Specific information concerning tuberculosis included the date of diagnosis, site or sites of disease, results of chest radiographs, and results of microbiologic studies.

The registries for tuberculosis and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) maintained by the San Francisco Department of Public Health were cross-matched to identify all patients reported to have both tuberculosis and AIDS as of September 1993. Confidentiality was ensured by having health department personnel remove all identifying information before the data analysis. The subjects' socioeconomic status was estimated by matching patients' addresses at the time of diagnosis to census-tract data (including indexes of unemployment, income, poverty level, education level, crowding, immigration status, and racial or ethnic distribution). Census-tract information was not included for 14 homeless persons.

Collection of M. tuberculosis Isolates and RFLP Analysis

Lowenstein-Jensen slant cultures used for mycobacterial identification and drug-susceptibility testing were prospectively collected for all microbiologically confirmed new cases of tuberculosis in San Francisco. RFLP analysis was performed with an internationally standardized method with internal molecular-weight standards23. The resulting autoradiographs were compared with the Bio Image Whole Band Analyzer, version 3.0 (Millipore, Ann Arbor, Mich.). All lanes that were found by computer analysis to have similar patterns were compared visually and classified as having matching RFLP patterns if the number and molecular weights of the bands were identical. Microbiology records were scrutinized for all patients who had only a single positive culture for which a smear for acid-fast bacilli was negative. These cultures were considered to be false positive if they were processed in the microbiology laboratory on the same day as a specimen with a positive smear from another patient with the same RFLP pattern24.

Epidemiologic Investigations

For all patients treated by the Department of Tuberculosis Control, an investigation of contacts was conducted by trained, multilingual disease-control investigators using standard methods25. For patients whose care was not managed by the Division of Tuberculosis Control, contact investigation was conducted either by the treating physician or by Tuberculosis Control personnel. In addition to the routine contact investigation, selected groups of patients infected with organisms with identical RFLP patterns were studied further by a more intensive review of the Division of Tuberculosis Control records. For patients in the largest cluster, all available clinic and hospital records were reviewed and the patients were interviewed.

Statistical Analysis

Data were entered and analyzed with FoxPro 2.5 (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash.), EpiInfo (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta), Egret (Statistics and Epidemiology Research Corporation, Seattle), and PC SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.) computer programs. A cluster was defined as two or more patients with identical RFLP patterns. Patients with unmatched RFLP patterns were considered nonclustered.

Student's t-test and the chi-square test were used to assess univariate risk factors for being in a cluster. Risk factors for clustering identified by univariate analysis were then included in multivariate logistic-regression models, with clustered and nonclustered as the dependent outcomes. Because age appeared to be related to clustering in a nonlinear fashion, with a marked decrease in risk at the age of 60 years, age was categorized as either less than 60 years or 60 years or older. Odds ratios were calculated from regression estimates based on the chi-squared approximation for the likelihood-ratio statistic; 95 percent confidence intervals were based on the estimated variance of the regression coefficients26. The likelihood-ratio statistics were also used to contrast the relative goodness of fit between competing logistic-regression models. Tests for interaction were conducted for all likely interacting variables. Age, sex, and factors that remained significant after adjustment for related variables were included in a final model.

Results

Patient Population and RFLP Patterns Obtained

During 1991 and 1992, 688 cases of tuberculosis were reported to the Division of Tuberculosis Control, 585 of which were confirmed by the isolation of M. tuberculosis. Viable isolates of M. tuberculosis were not available from 89 patients. These patients were similar to the 496 patients included in this study except that they were slightly older (median age, 46 years; P = 0.02) and more likely to be Asian (RFLP data were not available on 20 percent of Asian patients, P = 0.003).

Nine of the 496 patients were excluded from further study because their culture results fulfilled the criteria for laboratory cross-contamination. RFLP analysis of the strains isolated from the remaining 487 patients identified 326 distinct patterns, 282 of which were found in only 1 patient.

Previously published molecular biologic and epidemiologic studies have concluded that a clonal relation cannot be inferred to exist between strains of M. tuberculosis that have only one copy of IS611027,28. Accordingly, the 12 M. tuberculosis strains with only one copy of IS6110 were not included in the epidemiologic analysis. Consequently, the statistical analysis was based on 473 patients (Table 1) and 324 RFLP patterns, of which 44 were found to be shared by at least 2 patients (i.e., they were in clusters). The 44 shared RFLP patterns were obtained from 191 patients (Table 2). The RFLP patterns of strains isolated from clusters containing three or more patients are shown in Figure 1. Thus, 191 of the 473 patients (40 percent) were in 1 of the 44 clusters; the clusters ranged in size from 2 to 30 patients.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Analysis of Risk Factors for Clustering in 473 San Francisco Patients.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Cluster Sizes and the Number of Clusters among 473 San Francisco Patients with Tuberculosis.

 

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Results of RFLP Analysis of M. tuberculosis Strains Isolated from Three or More Patients.

The number of patients with M. tuberculosis isolates with a shared RFLP pattern is shown at the bottom of the figure. Twenty patterns, each found in two patients, are not shown. The 12 patients in the column at the left were excluded from analysis as described in the Results section.

 
Identification of Risk Factors

To identify risk factors for recent infection with M. tuberculosis, the 191 patients in clusters were compared with the 282 patients not in clusters. Univariate analysis (Table 1) showed that patients in clusters were more likely to be male, young (mean age, 40.8 years, vs. 48.4 years for patients not in clusters; P<0.001), black or Hispanic, and born in the United States; to have AIDS; to have received care at the Division of Tuberculosis Control clinic; and to reside in a census tract with a poverty rate of more than 20 percent. In contrast, a history of tuberculosis and Asian race were associated with a significantly decreased risk of being in a cluster. Infection with drug-resistant M. tuberculosis and the level of crowding and education in the census tract were not associated with clustering (data not shown).

Multivariate analysis of the risk factors for clustering revealed significant differences between younger and older patients (Table 3). For patients younger than 60 years, risk factors for clustering included Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio, 3.3; P = 0.02), black race (odds ratio, 2.3; P = 0.02), birth in the United States (odds ratio, 5.8; P<0.001), and AIDS (odds ratio, 1.8; P = 0.04). In contrast, for patients 60 years of age or older, the only significant risk factor was having been cared for at the Division of Tuberculosis Control clinic (odds ratio, 5.7; P = 0.008). In the older age group, Asian race was again associated with a reduced risk of being in a cluster.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Analysis of Risk Factors for Clustering after Adjustment for Sex and Age at Diagnosis.

 
Epidemiologic Investigation of RFLP Clusters

Intensive epidemiologic investigations were conducted of the 3 largest clusters and the 20 clusters composed of only two patients. Thus, 23 of the 44 clusters (52 percent), or 108 of the 191 patients (56 percent) with isolates with identical RFLP patterns, were included in this analysis.

Routine investigation had established that 12 patients in the largest cluster (Table 2) were living in or employed by a residential facility for patients with AIDS12. Our RFLP analysis identified an additional 18 patients with isolates with the same fingerprint who were not previously known to have any association with the facility. Seven of these patients were available for interview, eight had died, and three could not be located or refused to be interviewed.

The apparent index patient in this cluster was a 38-year-old white man with AIDS who was receiving general assistance, was not compliant with antituberculous therapy, and had had positive sputum smears for approximately six months. Specific transmission links could be established among nine of the patients who were not associated with the residential facility (Figure 2): two named one another as contacts, three were on the same hospital ward, and four were in the same general medical clinic at a time when it was reasonable to assume that transmission had occurred. Although seven additional patients were homeless, homosexual, or substance abusers, they were not otherwise linked epidemiologically. Three patients had no discernible connection with any of the other patients.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Transmission Links Identified between Patients with Isolates in the Largest Cluster.

Each dot represents a patient. Solid lines indicate links between patients who were residents or employees of the same residential facility, dashed lines links between patients who were identified as contacts of other patients, and dotted lines links between patients who were in the same hospital ward, clinic, or homeless shelter at a time when transmission was likely to have occurred. Dots not connected to a line represent the seven patients for whom no specific epidemiologic connection could be discerned. Squares denote patients with cavitary tuberculosis and positive smears, circles patients with tuberculosis who had documented conversions of tuberculin skin tests within two years, and triangles patients for whom there was no discernible connection with any of the other patients.

 
The second-largest cluster contained 23 patients who were primarily young (average age, 33 years), born in the United States (18 patients), and male (19 patients); 13 had AIDS, and 8 were substance abusers. The index patient was a 28-year-old white HIV-infected transsexual man who was an intravenous drug user and a prostitute. He had been found to have tuberculosis, with a positive sputum smear, shortly after moving to San Francisco and was noncompliant with therapy. The M. tuberculosis strain found in this patient was next isolated from four other young homeless HIV-infected intravenous drug users over a three-month period and subsequently from a more diverse group of patients.

The apparent index patient in the third-largest cluster (15 patients) was a 36-year-old HIV-seronegative black alcoholic man with cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis. He frequently used public facilities, including homeless shelters, detoxification centers, public clinics, and hospitals. This patient also was noncompliant with therapy and had had positive sputum smears for nine months. Most of the other patients in this cluster were also black (12 patients) and alcoholic (8 patients); only 5 of the 15 patients were recorded as having AIDS.

Efficacy of Contact Tracing

A conventional investigation of the patients' contacts identified connections among only 19 of the 191 patients (10 percent) found to be connected by RFLP analysis. Of the three largest clusters, contact tracing identified only the outbreak in the AIDS facility.

To examine further the relation between the patients' characteristics and the accuracy of conventional contact tracing, we studied the 20 clusters that contained only two patients each. Conventional contact tracing conducted before the RFLP results were available predicted transmission in only four of these clusters, all of them involving contact between an older patient who presumably had reactivated tuberculosis and a younger person in a traditional household setting. No instances of transmission between immigrants, transients, or patients with AIDS were predicted from the contact investigation.

Discussion

We used a systematic, population-based RFLP analysis of M. tuberculosis isolates in conjunction with conventional epidemiologic methods to describe the contemporary pattern of tuberculosis transmission in San Francisco. The information produced by this approach is consistent with that yielded by traditional reporting practices in that it enumerates and characterizes the cases that occurred during a given period in a single public health jurisdiction. However, our data provide considerably more information about tuberculosis transmission in this urban area, including evidence that an important factor in the resurgence of tuberculosis, despite an efficient tuberculosis-control program, is the ongoing transmission of a few strains of M. tuberculosis in specific subgroups of the population.

The use of RFLP analysis to identify the pathways of tuberculosis transmission within a community is based on the premise that epidemiologically unrelated cases will have occurred as a result of the reactivation of latent infection and thus have unique RFLP patterns, whereas cases that are linked as a consequence of recent infection will have the same patterns (i.e., appear in a defined cluster). In this study, the first contention is supported by the vast diversity of RFLP patterns in San Francisco: 326 distinct patterns among the 487 strains analyzed. The second is supported by the congruence of the molecular-fingerprinting data and results of the epidemiologic study of tuberculosis outbreaks4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21.

We found that 191 of the 473 patients (40 percent) had 1 of 44 clustered RFLP patterns and thus may have been epidemiologically linked. Assuming that a typical cluster of n persons comprises one index patient with reactivated disease and n - 1 patients with recently acquired disease, we estimate that at least 31 percent (191 - 44) of the 473 cases were due to recent infection that had progressed to active disease during the two-year study period. Because RFLP analysis can only be used to analyze microbiologically confirmed cases, patients who became infected but whose infection remained latent during the course of the study were not identified. Reactivation of infection in these latently infected persons will continue to produce overt disease for decades. As a result, the true magnitude of the increased burden of tuberculosis due to recent M. tuberculosis infection in San Francisco is probably greater than our estimate of 31 percent.

A principal objective of this study was the identification of risk factors for recent infection. Because we focused only on cases reported during a two-year period, our analysis of risk factors encompassed only the subgroup of recently infected patients whose infection progressed to active disease during this interval. As a result, epidemiologic risk factors for transmission are necessarily combined with biologic risk factors that are associated with rapid progression.

For patients less than 60 years of age, a diagnosis of AIDS, birth in the United States, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity were found by multivariate analysis to be significant, independent risk factors. HIV seropositivity itself was not a significant risk factor for clustering in the patients for whom HIV serologic data were available (data not shown), probably reflecting the importance of the degree of immunosuppression in the development of tuberculosis. In contrast, patients with AIDS and severe immunosuppression are at increased risk of being in a cluster. This probably reflects the combined effects of a shortened interval between infection and active disease and the tendency for patients with AIDS to be brought together in common medical or living facilities.

Being born in the United States also might act as a risk factor through a biologic mechanism, since most such persons will have a negative tuberculin test and thus lack the relative immunity associated with latent tuberculosis. In younger subjects, birth outside the United States protected against newly acquired infection. Even after adjustment for race and ethnicity, the immigrant population was significantly more likely to have reactivated disease (and was less likely to be in a cluster) than persons born in the United States. This may reflect the high rate of latent tuberculosis infection in children born in developing countries. If so, our results suggest that childhood infection both protects immigrants from new infection and places them at risk for reactivation.

Strikingly different risk factors were found for persons 60 years of age or older. In this age group, treatment at the municipal tuberculosis clinic was the only variable identified as a risk factor for clustering. Because most patients cared for in this clinic have already been given a diagnosis of tuberculosis, the clinic itself is unlikely to have been a locus for transmission. Instead, its use may be a proxy for the use of other social and medical facilities where transmission may have occurred. In the older age group, being Asian was a significant negative risk factor for clustering, probably because many older patients have latent infection that may become reactivated.

Epidemiologic investigation of the three largest clusters reconfirms that a single patient with highly infectious disease can have a major impact on urban programs of tuberculosis control. Each of the index patients had positive smears and was poorly compliant in taking the prescribed antimicrobial therapy. In the largest cluster the putative index patient, one of the few patients not treated successfully by the San Francisco Tuberculosis Control Program, apparently infected 29 additional patients. Thus, this one patient accounted for 6 percent of the cases evaluated in San Francisco during the study period. Data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that such noncompliant patients are uncommon in San Francisco, where during the study period at least 95 percent of patients completed their regimens of antituberculous drugs. The cumulative contribution of such persons may be much greater in areas where compliance rates are lower and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is prevalent.

Overall, conventional contact tracing, conducted by an efficient tuberculosis-control program, identified only 10 percent of the patients in clusters. This low level of efficacy is best explained by the overrepresentation in clusters of unemployed and homeless persons, who may have become infected in settings determined primarily by lifestyle and by social subgroups. Contacts of this kind may have been multiple, transient, and difficult to reconstruct by routine tracing techniques. The overrepresentation of patients with AIDS may also have reduced the efficacy of contact tracing in this group, since the presumably increased susceptibility of such persons to tuberculosis may have permitted transmission to occur in settings where exposure is neither prolonged nor intense. Casual transmission of this kind is hard to detect with current techniques of contact tracing.

This study has three major implications for urban tuberculosis control. First, because more cases of tuberculosis are arising as a result of recent infection with M. tuberculosis than has been heretofore appreciated, increased emphasis should be placed on the identification of sites of transmission and the application of environmental controls. Second, because a single infectious patient may have devastating effects on tuberculosis control, the treatment of patients with infectious tuberculosis must be prompt and effective. Third, because only 10 percent of the patients in clusters were identified by a conventional investigation of contacts, novel approaches to contact tracing may need to be developed and targeted to specific populations.

Supported in part by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, grants from the National Institutes of Health (K08 AI01137-01 and R01 AI34238-01), and a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U52-CCU 900454).

We are indebted to the personnel of the San Francisco Department of Public Health Division of Tuberculosis Control, whose high quality of service and cooperation have made this work possible; to Aimee LaPerriere-Hunt for diligent research assistance; to Arthur Back (deceased), Anna Babst of the San Francisco Public Health Laboratory, Arthur Reingold, Gretchen Anderson, and the Western Consortium for Public Health, Bacterial and Mycotic Surveillance Project for assistance with the collection of M. tuberculosis; to Kevan Gross and Eric Preston for essential assistance with computer-software design; to Karl Reich for many thoughtful discussions regarding the molecular biology of M. tuberculosis; to Lorene Nelson and Jerry Halpern of the Stanford University Department of Health Research and Policy for important advice about statistical analysis; and to Dr. Nancy Krieger, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, Calif., for San Francisco County census-tract information.


Source Information

From the Division of Infectious Disease and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine (P.M.S., J.P., D.C.R., G.K.S.), and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (S.P.S., G.K.S.), Stanford Medical School, Stanford, Calif.; the Medical Service, San Francisco General Hospital, and the University of California, San Francisco (P.C.H., G.F.S., C.L.D.); and the Division of Tuberculosis Control, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco (A.P., G.F.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Small at Beckman Center, Rm. 251, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tuberculosis statistics in the United States, 1991. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, 1993. 
  2. Brudney K, Dobkin J. Resurgent tuberculosis in New York City: human immunodeficiency virus, homelessness, and the decline of tuberculosis control programs. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:745-749. [Medline]
  3. Horwitz O, Edwards PQ, Lowell AM. National tuberculosis control program in Denmark and the United States. Health Serv Rep 1973;88:493-498. [Medline]
  4. Hermans PWM, van Soolingen D, Dale JW, et al. Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2051-2058. [Free Full Text]
  5. Cave MD, Eisenach KD, McDermott PF, Bates JH, Crawford JT. IS6110: conservation of sequence in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and its utilization in DNA fingerprinting. Mol Cell Probes 1991;5:73-80. [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Otal I, Martin C, Vincent-Levy-Frebault V, Thierry D, Gicquel B. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis using IS6110 as an epidemiological marker in tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:1252-1254. [Free Full Text]
  7. Small PM, Shafer RW, Hopewell PC, et al. Exogenous reinfection with multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with advanced HIV infection. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1137-1144. [Free Full Text]
  8. van Soolingen D, Hermans PWM, de Haas PEW, Soll DR, van Embden JDA. Occurrence and stability of insertion sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2578-2586. [Free Full Text]
  9. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among HIV-infected persons -- Florida and New York, 1988-1991. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1991;40:585-591. [Medline]
  10. Beck-Sague C, Dooley SW, Hutton MD, et al. Hospital outbreak of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections: factors in transmission to staff and HIV-infected patients. JAMA 1992;268:1280-1286. [Free Full Text]
  11. Transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among immunocompromised persons in a correctional system -- New York, 1991. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992;41:507-9
  12. Daley CL, Small PM, Schecter GF, et al. An outbreak of tuberculosis with accelerated progression among persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: an analysis using restriction-fragment-length polymorphisms. N Engl J Med 1992;326:231-235. [Abstract]
  13. Edlin BR, Tokars JI, Grieco MH, et al. An outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among hospitalized patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1514-1521. [Abstract]
  14. Godfrey-Faussett P, Mortimer PR, Jenkins PA, Stoker NG. Evidence of transmission of tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting. BMJ 1992;305:221-223.
  15. Pearson ML, Jereb JA, Frieden TR, et al. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a risk to patients and health care workers. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:191-196.
  16. Rastogi N, Ross BC, Dwyer B, et al. Emergence during unsuccessful chemotherapy of multiple drug resistance in a strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992;11:901-907. [CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Coronado VG, Beck-Sague CM, Hutton MD, et al. Transmission of multi-drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection in an urban hospital: epidemiologic and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Infect Dis 1993;168:1052-1055. [Medline]
  18. Dwyer B, Jackson K, Raios K, Sievers A, Wilshire E, Ross B. DNA restriction fragment analysis to define an extended cluster of tuberculosis in homeless men and their associates. J Infect Dis 1993;167:490-494. [Medline]
  19. Takahashi M, Kazumi Y, Fukasawa Y, et al. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of epidemiologically related Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Microbiol Immunol 1993;37:289-294. [Medline]
  20. Genewein A, Telenti A, Bernasconi C, et al. Molecular approach to identifying route of transmission of tuberculosis in the community. Lancet 1993;342:841-844. [CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Tabet SR, Goldbaum GM, Hooton TM, Eisenach KD, Cave MD, Nolan CM. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis detecting a community-based tuberculosis outbreak among persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis 1994;169:189-192. [Medline]
  22. Chevrel-Dellagi D, Abderrahman A, Haltiti R, Koubaji H, Gicquel B, Dellagi K. Large-scale DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains as a tool for epidemiological studies of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2446-2450. [Free Full Text]
  23. van Embden JDA, Cave MD, Crawford JT, et al. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:406-409. [Free Full Text]
  24. Small PM, McClenny NB, Singh SP, Schoolnik GK, Tompkins LS, Mickelsen PA. Molecular strain typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to confirm cross-contamination in the mycobacteriology laboratory and modification of procedures to minimize occurrence of false-positive cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:1677-1682. [Free Full Text]
  25. American Thoracic Society. Control of tuberculosis in the United States. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;146:1623-1633. 
  26. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980:192-246. (IARC scientific publications no. 32).
  27. Hermans PW, van Soolingen D, Bik EM, de Haas PEW, Dale JW, van Embden JDA. Insertion element IS987 from Mycobacterium bovis BCG is located in a hot-spot integration region for insertion elements in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Infect Immun 1991;59:2695-2705. [Free Full Text]
  28. Yuen LK, Ross BC, Jackson KM, Dwyer B. Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Vietnamese patients by Southern blot hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:1615-1618. [Free Full Text]

 

This Article
-Abstract

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Transmission of Tuberculosis
McKenna M., Williams M. H., Pollen R. H., Joy M., Small P. M., Hopewell P. C., Schoolnik G. K., Kalkut G. E., Alland D., Bloom B. R., Frieden T. R., Hamburg M. A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1093-1096, Oct 20, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.