The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 330:229-234 January 27, 1994 Number 4
NextNext

Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction in Synovial Fluid from Patients with Lyme Arthritis
James J. Nocton, Frank Dressler, Barbara J. Rutledge, Paul N. Rys, David H. Persing, and Allen C. Steere

 

This Article
-Abstract

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Borrelia burgdorferi is difficult to detect in synovial fluid, which limits our understanding of the pathogenesis of Lyme arthritis, particularly when arthritis persists despite antibiotic therapy.

Methods Using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we attempted to detect B. burgdorferi DNA in joint-fluid samples obtained over a 17-year period. The samples were tested in two separate laboratories with four sets of primers and probes, three of which target plasmid DNA that encodes outer-surface protein A (OspA).

Results B. burgdorferi DNA was detected in 75 of 88 patients with Lyme arthritis (85 percent) and in none of 64 control patients. Each of the three OspA primer-probe sets was sensitive, and the results were moderately concordant in the two laboratories (kappa = 0.54 to 0.73). Of 73 patients with Lyme arthritis that was untreated or treated with only short courses of oral antibiotics, 70 (96 percent) had positive PCR results. In contrast, of 19 patients who received either parenteral antibiotics or long courses of oral antibiotics ( >= 1 month), only 7 (37 percent) had positive tests (P<0.001). None of these seven patients had received more than two months of oral antibiotic treatment or more than three weeks of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Of 10 patients with chronic arthritis (continuous joint inflammation for one year or more) despite multiple courses of antibiotics, 7 had consistently negative tests in samples obtained three months to two years after treatment.

Conclusions PCR testing can detect B. burgdorferi DNA in synovial fluid. This test may be able to show whether Lyme arthritis that persists after antibiotic treatment is due to persistence of the spirochete.


Lyme disease is caused by the tick-borne spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi1. Weeks to months after the onset of disease, approximately 60 percent of untreated patients begin to have brief, intermittent attacks of arthritis that may recur for several years2. A small percentage of these patients have continuous arthritis for one year or longer, a condition we have termed "chronic Lyme arthritis"2,3. Eventually, both intermittent and chronic Lyme arthritis resolve, even in untreated patients2,4.

Lyme arthritis can usually be treated successfully with either a one-month course of doxycycline or amoxicillin or a two-week course of intravenous ceftriaxone or penicillin5,6,7. However, a small percentage of patients have persistent arthritis despite multiple courses of oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy5,6,7. In these patients there is an increased frequency of HLA-DR4 or, secondarily, HLA-DR2 in association with antibody reactivity to outer-surface proteins A and B (OspA and OspB) of the spirochete8,9. It has been unclear whether this treatment-resistant course results from persistent infection or from postinfective immune-mediated phenomena. The ability to demonstrate the presence or absence of B. burgdorferi in the joint would improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of Lyme arthritis.

B. burgdorferi can be cultured readily from the skin lesions of erythema migrans,10 but it has been difficult to detect the spirochete in joints; it has been recovered from the synovial fluid of only two patients with Lyme arthritis11,12. With immunohistologic techniques, spirochetal forms have been seen in synovial tissue,13 but this method of detection has been inconclusive. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has recently been used to amplify and detect B. burgdorferi DNA in cultured spirochetes,14,15 Ixodes dammini ticks,16,17 infected animals,18,19 and patients with Lyme disease20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33. In these studies, DNA sequences have been successfully detected in blood,20,21,30,32 cerebrospinal fluid,22,23,24,25,32,33 urine,21,25,28,32 skin,29,30,31 and (in eight cases) synovial fluid21,26,27,32. Thus, the PCR assay is capable of amplifying and detecting B. burgdorferi DNA, but its value as a reliable diagnostic test, particularly in synovial fluid, is not yet clear.

We report here on our evaluation of PCR testing as a diagnostic test for the presence of B. burgdorferi DNA in synovial fluid. If the test can reliably identify the presence of spirochetes, it may help to determine whether persistent arthritis after treatment is due to active infection or to an immune reaction that persists after the eradication of viable spirochetes.

Methods

Patients

During a 17-year period, samples of synovial fluid were collected from 127 patients with Lyme arthritis who were seen in the Lyme disease clinics at Yale-New Haven Hospital (1975 to 1987) or New England Medical Center (1987 to 1992). The following criteria were used to define Lyme arthritis: brief, intermittent attacks of oligoarticular arthritis, exposure in an area of endemic disease, an elevated antibody response to B. burgdorferi on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the exclusion of other known forms of arthritis. The synovial-fluid samples were divided into multiple aliquots and frozen at -70 °C; in most instances, the aliquot used for PCR testing was not opened before this study. Samples from 37 of the patients were collected in heparin, a known inhibitor of PCR amplification34; these samples were excluded from the study. Single samples were tested in 61 of the remaining 90 patients, and two to five serial samples were tested in 29. Clinical data collected from the charts of patients with Lyme arthritis were analyzed without knowledge of the results of PCR assays. During the same 17-year period, synovial fluid was also obtained from 69 control patients with other forms of arthritis. Seventeen of these samples were collected, processed, and stored in the same way as those from the patients with Lyme arthritis. Among the control patients, 20 had rheumatoid arthritis; 7 each had gout, osteoarthritis, and degenerative joint disease; 5 had juvenile rheumatoid arthritis; 2 each had pseudogout, psoriatic arthritis, scleroderma, spondyloarthropathy, and Reiter's syndrome; and 13 had other forms of arthritis.

PCR Assay

Synovial-fluid samples from case and control patients were processed in a blinded manner in two separate laboratories according to the following protocol. DNA was isolated from 100 to 200 microl of synovial fluid with a commercially available kit (Isoquick, Microprobe, Bothell, Wash.) according to the manufacturer's specifications, modified by the addition of 20 µg of glycogen to each sample as a carrier during isopropanol precipitation. With each DNA extraction, synovial-fluid samples from case and control patients were processed simultaneously. Filter-barrier pipette tips and a dedicated set of pipettors were used to prepare all samples.

Three separate regions of the B. burgdorferi genome were targeted for PCR amplification by four sets of primers and probes (Table 1). Sets 1, 2, and 3 targeted portions of the B. burgdorferi plasmid gene encoding OspA, and set 4 targeted a portion of the chromosomal DNA encoding 16S ribosomal RNA35. Sets 2 and 3 targeted the same sequence of the OspA gene for amplification, but used different internal probes for detection.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Oligonucleotide Primer and Probe Sequences.

 
Primers and probes were synthesized on an oligonucleotide synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), desalted on an oligonucleotide-purification cartridge (Glen Research, Sterling, Va.), and used without further purification. Total DNA was dissolved in 30 microl of water; 5 microl of this solution was added to a PCR mixture containing 50 pM of each primer (final concentration, 1.0 micro M), 200 micro M of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 10 mM TRIS-hydrochloride (pH 8.3), 50 mM potassium chloride, 17.5 mM magnesium chloride, 0.01 µg of bovine serum albumin per microl, 10 percent glycerol, 0.5 percent Tween-20, and 1.25 units of Taq polymerase (Amplitaq, Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, Conn.). Five microgs of isopsoralen was added to the PCR mixture to inactivate products after amplification,36 and the total volume was adjusted to 50 microl with water. The mixture was overlaid with one drop of mineral oil. Amplification reactions, which were performed in a thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer Cetus) stored in a separate laboratory, consisted of 45 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 seconds, annealing at 50 °C for 45 seconds, and extension at 72 °C for 1 minute. The cycles were preceded by a four-minute phase at 94 °C and followed by a final seven-minute extension phase at 72 °C. After amplification, samples were immediately exposed to 20 mW of 300-to-400-nm light per square centimeter for 20 minutes to inactivate the products and were stored at -20 °C.

Control samples included with each amplification assay included samples with DNA extracted from control patients, three blank control samples with 5 microl of water substituted for DNA, and a positive control sample with 60 pg of total B. burgdorferi DNA (strain 297). Amplification products were stored and analyzed in a separate area, and positive-displacement pipettes with disposable pistons were used to prepare all PCR reagents.

Amplified products (5 microl) were resolved by 4 percent agarose gel electrophoresis (3 percent NuSieve and 1 percent SeaKem, FMC Corporation, Rockland, Me.) at 35 to 100 V for one to three hours. The gel was then stained with ethidium bromide and visualized, washed with water, washed in denaturation solution (1.5 M sodium chloride and 0.5 M sodium hydroxide) for 45 minutes, rinsed again with water, washed in neutralization solution (1.5 M sodium chloride and 0.5 M TRIS [pH 7.5]), and blotted. Blotting was performed overnight on a nylon membrane (Hybond-N, Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.) with 0.15 M sodium chloride and 0.015 M sodium citrate (SSC). The membrane was cross-linked with 0.12 J of ultraviolet light.

Membranes were washed in hybridization fluid (5x Denhardt's solution [1x Denhardt's solution is 0.02 percent Ficoll, 0.02 percent polyvinylpyrrolidone, and 0.02 percent bovine serum albumin], 0.75 M sodium chloride, 0.025 M sodium phosphate, 0.005 M ethylenediamine tetraacetate, 0.5 percent sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 100 µg of denatured salmon-sperm DNA per microl) for four hours at 55 °C. An oligonucleotide probe end-labeled with phosphorus-32 was then added for 15 to 17 hours at 55 °C. After hybridization, the membranes were washed in 2x SSC and 0.1 percent sodium dodecyl sulfate for 10 minutes, 1x SSC and 0.1 percent sodium dodecyl sulfate for 20 minutes, and 0.2x SSC and 0.1 percent sodium dodecyl sulfate for 30 minutes. Finally, the membranes were exposed to Kodak XAR-5 film for 4 to 72 hours at -70 °C. Alternatively, the amplification products were detected by means of a chemiluminescent probe as described elsewhere37. DNA bands were rarely seen on ethidium-stained gels; samples were therefore considered positive on the basis of signal detection after hybridization.

Inhibition Assays

The initial samples from each patient with Lyme arthritis in which B. burgdorferi DNA was not detected and 62 of the 69 samples from the controls were tested for the presence of PCR inhibitors. One thousand copies (as determined by serial dilution) of the OspA2-OspA4 amplification product made without isopsoralen cross-linking were added to each sample and then amplified with primers OspA2 and OspA4. Samples that yielded no amplification signal were considered inhibitory and were excluded from the study.

Statistical Analysis

The similarity of groups was compared by Fisher's exact test, the distribution of values among the groups was compared by Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and concordance among test results was calculated with {kappa} values according to the following formula: {kappa} = (observed agreement - expected agreement) divided by (1 - expected agreement). All P values are two-tailed.

Results

In tests performed independently in two laboratories, B. burgdorferi DNA was detected with at least one primer-probe set in the initial samples of synovial fluid from 75 of the 90 patients with Lyme arthritis. In contrast, B. burgdorferi DNA was not found in any of the 69 control patients or in the blank control samples. In inhibition assays, 2 of the 15 negative samples from the patients with Lyme arthritis and 5 samples from control patients still produced negative results, indicating that inhibitors of PCR amplification were present. With these samples excluded, B. burgdorferi DNA was detected in the initial sample from 75 of 88 patients with Lyme arthritis but none of 64 control patients (Table 2).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. PCR Results in Synovial Fluid from Case and Control Patients.

 
Of the four primer-probe sets used in the two laboratories, the three OspA sets each detected B. burgdorferi DNA in 75 to 89 percent of the 75 patients with positive test results (Table 2). Forty-eight patients (64 percent) had positive results with all three OspA sets, whereas 18 patients (24 percent) had positive results with only one of the sets. Set 4, which detected chromosomal DNA encoding 16S ribosomal RNA, was less sensitive than the OspA primer-probe sets; 56 percent of the 75 patients had positive results with this set, and all of them also had positive results with OspA set 3. In laboratory 1, 88 percent of the patients had concordant results with the two OspA primer-probe sets used in that laboratory (kappa = 0.73). Between laboratories 1 and 2, 78 percent had concordant results with the OspA primer-probe sets that targeted the same gene segment (sets 2 and 3) (kappa = 0.54).

Clinical data from the 88 patients with Lyme arthritis were correlated with the PCR results from their initial samples of synovial fluid (Table 3). As compared with the 13 patients with negative results, the 75 patients in whom B. burgdorferi DNA was detected in joint fluid had significantly higher white-cell counts in synovial fluid (P<0.003), shorter durations of illness (P<0.02) and arthritis (P<0.03), and a longer duration of arthritis after aspiration (P = 0.03). Almost all of those with positive results were untreated or had only received short courses of oral antibiotic therapy (<1 month) before joint aspiration (P<0.001).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Clinical Data and PCR Results in Patients with Lyme Arthritis.

 
Of the 88 patients in this study, 45 never received antibiotic therapy. B. burgdorferi DNA was detected in the synovial fluid of 43 of these patients (Table 4). All 12 patients from whom serial samples were available for testing had detectable B. burgdorferi DNA in their first sample (Figure 1). In 9 of the 12 patients, including the 3 who had chronic arthritis (one year or more of continuous joint inflammation), all additional samples were also positive months to years later during subsequent episodes of arthritis. In the remaining three patients, B. burgdorferi DNA was not detected in the last synovial-fluid sample, and their arthritis resolved within the next few months.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. PCR Results According to Antibiotic Treatment.

 

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Natural History of Lyme Arthritis and PCR Results in 12 Untreated Patients.

The horizontal lines indicate periods of arthritis. Patients 10, 11, and 12 had chronic Lyme arthritis, defined as one year or more of continuous joint inflammation. The results of PCR testing are indicated above the horizontal lines, with plus and minus signs denoting positive and negative results, respectively. Syn denotes synovectomy.

 
Forty-three of the 88 patients received antibiotic therapy sometime during the course of Lyme disease. Of the 16 patients with pretreatment synovial-fluid samples available for testing, 15 had positive test results (Table 4). In another 12 patients with synovial fluid obtained two months to four years after short courses of oral antibiotic therapy, all samples were also positive. In 19 patients, 4 of whom also had pretreatment samples available for testing, synovial fluid was obtained after either long courses of oral antibiotics (doxycycline or amoxicillin for one month or more) or parenteral antibiotics (intravenous or intramuscular penicillin or intravenous ceftriaxone), regimens recommended for the treatment of Lyme arthritis38,39. In 7 of the 19 patients, B. burgdorferi DNA was detected in samples obtained 1 day to 17 months after the completion of antibiotic therapy. Three of these patients were treated with both oral and intravenous antibiotics, two received three weekly doses of intramuscular penicillin G benzathine, and two were given only oral antibiotics. The median duration of their oral treatment was 37 days (range, 20 to 58), and the median duration of intravenous therapy was 14 days (range, 14 to 20). In the remaining 12 patients, samples obtained one day to four years after antibiotic treatment were all negative. Seven of these patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics, two received intramuscular penicillin, and three were given only oral antibiotics. Their median duration of oral treatment was 48 days (range, 21 to 120), and the median duration of intravenous therapy was 30 days (range, 7 to 44). Although the patients with negative PCR results tended to have been treated longer than those with positive PCR results, the differences were not statistically significant. Of 10 patients who had chronic Lyme arthritis despite multiple courses of antibiotic therapy, 7 had negative test results in all post-treatment samples.

Altogether, of 73 patients with Lyme arthritis who were untreated or treated with short courses of oral antibiotics before testing, 70 (96 percent) had positive PCR results. In contrast, of 19 patients who received either parenteral antibiotics or long courses of oral antibiotics, only 7 (37 percent) had positive test results after treatment (P<0.001). In the 29 patients for whom serial samples were available, all pretreatment samples were positive. Once post-treatment samples became negative, all subsequent samples remained negative.

Discussion

We present evidence that PCR is a useful method for detecting B. burgdorferi DNA in synovial fluid from patients with Lyme arthritis. The main concern about this technique is that minute contamination may produce false positive results. To ensure that contamination did not influence our results, control samples of joint fluid were collected and stored like case samples, DNA extraction and PCR preparation were performed in a dedicated room, all PCR products were inactivated with isopsoralen after amplification, multiple blank control samples were included with each group of samples tested, and the samples were tested in a blinded manner in two separate laboratories. In both laboratories, nearly all joint-fluid samples from untreated patients with Lyme arthritis contained detectable B. burgdorferi DNA, most post-treatment samples did not, and all control samples were negative. This distribution would be extremely unlikely had the samples been contaminated.

In both laboratories, the sensitivity of each of the three OspA primer-probe sets was high (75 to 89 percent), and the results among these sets were moderately concordant. In contrast, the primer-probe set that detected chromosomal DNA was less sensitive. This discrepancy has been observed consistently in all our studies of B. burgdorferi detection in synovial fluid35. Multiple copies of OspA DNA segments may be contained within spirochetes, and these targets may therefore be more easily detected. Alternatively, spirochetes may not always be present in synovial fluid but may be capable of shedding OspA segments into the fluid from the surrounding synovium. Membrane vesicles containing extrachromosomal DNA are shed from the surface of the spirochete,40,41 and they have been postulated to be mediators of DNA transfer between organisms42. A third possibility is that plasmid DNA may persist in synovial fluid after the death of the spirochete. In our study and others,21,24 however, OspA DNA was detected primarily in untreated patients with clinically active disease. After antibiotic treatment, the PCR results were usually negative, which would not be expected if OspA DNA persisted after the spirochete had been killed. Likewise, in studies of experimental B. burgdorferi infection in mice, PCR results were almost always negative within two to four weeks after treatment with ceftriaxone (unpublished data). Another example of this phenomenon is the clearance of viral DNA from cerebrospinal fluid within one to four weeks after acyclovir treatment in patients with herpes simplex encephalitis43. Thus, it seems likely that the detection of OspA DNA in joint fluid indicates the presence of viable spirochetes. Further studies aimed at detecting potentially more labile spirochetal RNA molecules44 may help to confirm this hypothesis.

Since joint effusions resolved in most patients during the course of antibiotic therapy, it was usually not possible to obtain samples of synovial fluid after treatment. Of the patients with persistent effusions after one month of oral antibiotics or two weeks of intravenous antibiotics, approximately one third still had positive PCR results, suggesting that the spirochete may not have been eradicated. However, none of the patients with positive PCR results after treatment had received more than two months of oral antibiotics or three weeks of intravenous antibiotics. Most of the patients who had chronic arthritis despite multiple courses of antibiotic therapy had negative PCR results in all post-treatment samples. In these patients, the lack of response to antibiotics, the negative PCR results, and the association of this syndrome with immunogenetic and immune markers8,9 suggest that genetically susceptible persons may continue to have arthritis for months or even several years after the eradication of viable spirochetes from synovial fluid.

Despite the identification of B. burgdorferi as the cause of Lyme disease in 1982, it has been practically impossible to demonstrate the presence of the spirochete in synovial fluid. The PCR test of synovial fluid in Lyme arthritis now shows promise and may fill the role that culture serves in detecting common bacterial pathogens in septic arthritis. In addition, PCR results may prove useful when therapeutic decisions are made for patients with persistent Lyme arthritis despite multiple courses of antibiotic therapy.

Supported in part by grants (AR-20358, AR-40576, and AR-07570 to Dr. Steere; and AR-41497, AI-32403, and AI-30548 to Dr. Persing) from the National Institutes of Health and by the Eshe Fund.

We are indebted to Brenda Fung for many helpful suggestions, Michael Berne for synthesizing oligonucleotide primers and probes, Chris Schmid for statistical assistance, Tim Rotman for assistance in preparing the figures, and April Chang-Miller, Joseph Duffy, Paul Dellaripa, Robert Kalish, James Logan, and other members of the Mayo Section of Rheumatology and the New England Medical Center Division of Rheumatology/Immunology for providing synovial-fluid samples from control patients.


Source Information

From the Divisions of Rheumatology/Immunology (J.J.N., F.D., A.C.S.) and Pediatric Rheumatology (J.J.N., F.D.), New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; and the Sections of Clinical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Experimental Pathology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn. (B.J.R., P.N.R., D.H.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Nocton at the Division of Rheumatology/Immunology, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111.

References

  1. Steere AC. Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 1989;321:586-596. [Abstract]
  2. Steere AC, Schoen RT, Taylor E. The clinical evolution of Lyme arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1987;107:725-731.
  3. Steere AC, Gibofsky A, Patarroyo ME, Winchester RJ, Hardin JA, Malawista SE. Chronic Lyme arthritis: clinical and immunogenetic differentiation from rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:896-901.
  4. Szer IS, Taylor E, Steere AC. The long-term course of Lyme arthritis in children. N Engl J Med 1991;325:159-163. [Abstract]
  5. Steere AC, Green J, Schoen RT, et al. Successful parenteral penicillin therapy of established Lyme arthritis. N Engl J Med 1985;312:869-874. [Abstract]
  6. Dattwyler RJ, Halperin JJ, Volkman DJ, Luft BJ. Treatment of late Lyme borreliosis -- randomised comparison of ceftriaxone and penicillin. Lancet 1988;1:1191-1194. [Medline]
  7. Steere AC, Levin RE, Molloy PJ, et al. Antibiotic treatment of Lyme arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:Suppl:S40-S40.abstract 
  8. Steere AC, Dwyer E, Winchester R. Association of chronic Lyme arthritis with HLA-DR4 and HLA-DR2 alleles. N Engl J Med 1990;323:219-223. [Abstract]
  9. Kalish RA, Leong JM, Steere AC. Association of treatment-resistant chronic Lyme arthritis with HLA-DR4 and antibody reactivity to OspA and OspB of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 1993;61:2774-2779. [Free Full Text]
  10. Berger BW, Kaplan MH, Rothenberg IR, Barbour AG. Isolation and characterization of the Lyme disease spirochete from the skin of patients with erythema chronicum migans. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;13:444-449. [Medline]
  11. Snydman DR, Schenkein DP, Berardi VP, Lastavica CC, Pariser KM. Borrelia burgdorferi in joint fluid in chronic Lyme arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1986;104:798-800.
  12. Schmidli J, Hunziker T, Moesli P, Schaad UB. Cultivation of Borrelia burgdorferi from joint fluid three months after treatment of facial palsy due to Lyme borreliosis. J Infect Dis 1988;158:905-906. [Medline]
  13. Steere AC, Duray PH, Butcher EC. Spirochetal antigens and lymphoid cell surface markers in Lyme synovitis: comparison with rheumatoid synovium and tonsillar lymphoid tissue. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:487-495. [Medline]
  14. Rosa PA, Schwan TG. A specific and sensitive assay for the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi using the polymerase chain reaction. J Infect Dis 1989;160:1018-1029. [Medline]
  15. Nielsen SL, Young KKY, Barbour AG. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. Mol Cell Probes 1990;4:73-79. [CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Persing DH, Telford SR III, Spielman A, Barthold SW. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in Ixodes dammini ticks with the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:566-572. [Free Full Text]
  17. Persing DH, Telford SR III, Rys PN, et al. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in museum specimens of Ixodes dammini ticks. Science 1990;249:1420-1423. [Free Full Text]
  18. Malloy DC, Nauman RK, Paxton H. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1089-1093. [Free Full Text]
  19. Lebech AM, Hindersson P, Vuust J, Hansen K. Comparison of in vitro culture and polymerase chain reaction for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in tissue from experimentally infected animals. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:731-737. [Free Full Text]
  20. Guy EC, Stanek G. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with Lyme disease by the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Pathol 1991;44:610-611. [Free Full Text]
  21. Williams WV, Callegari P, Freundlich B, et al. Molecular diagnosis of Borrelia burgdorferi infection (Lyme disease). DNA Cell Biol 1992;11:207-213. [Medline]
  22. Kruger WH, Pulz M. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in cerebrospinal fluid by the polymerase chain reaction. J Med Microbiol 1991;35:98-102. [Free Full Text]
  23. Jaulhac B, Nicolini P, Piemont Y, Monteil H. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Lyme borreliosis. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1440-1440. [Medline]
  24. Keller TL, Halperin JJ, Whitman M. PCR detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of Lyme neuroborreliosis patients. Neurology 1992;42:32-42. [Free Full Text]
  25. Lebech A, Hansen K. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in urine samples and cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with early and late Lyme neuroborreliosis by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:1646-1653. [Free Full Text]
  26. Nielsen SL, Peter JB. B. burgdorferi persistently detected by polymerase chain reaction in synovial fluid of a patient with Lyme arthritis resistant to therapy. Clin Res 1990;38:402A-402A.abstract 
  27. Malawista SE, Schoen RT, Moore TL, Dodge DE, White TJ, Persing DH. Failure of multitarget detection of Borrelia burgdorferi-associated DNA sequences in synovial fluids of patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: a cautionary note. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:246-247. [Medline]
  28. Goodman JL, Jurkovich P, Kramber JM, Johnson RC. Molecular detection of persistent Borrelia burgdorferi in the urine of patients with active Lyme disease. Infect Immun 1991;59:269-278. [Free Full Text]
  29. Melchers W, Meis J, Rosa P, et al. Amplification of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in skin biopsies from patients with Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2401-2406. [Free Full Text]
  30. Rabb DC, Lesher JL Jr, Chandler FW. Polymerase chain reaction confirmation of Borrelia burgdorferi in benign lymphocytic infiltrate of dermis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;26:267-268. [CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Schwartz I, Wormser GP, Schwartz JJ, et al. Diagnosis of early Lyme disease by polymerase chain reaction amplification and culture of skin biopsies from erythema migrans lesions. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:3082-3088. [Free Full Text]
  32. Liebling MR, Nishio MJ, Rodriguez A, Sigal LH, Jin T, Louie JS. The polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in human body fluids. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:665-675. [Medline]
  33. Luft BJ, Steinman CR, Neimark HC, et al. Invasion of the central nervous system by Borrelia burgdorferi in acute disseminated infection. JAMA 1992;267:1364-1367. [Erratum, JAMA 1992;268:872.] [Free Full Text]
  34. Holodniy M, Kim S, Katzenstein D, Konrad M, Groves E, Merigan TC. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus gene amplification by heparin. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:676-679. [Free Full Text]
  35. Persing DH, Rutledge BJ, Rys PN, et al. Target imbalance: disparity of Borrelia burgdorferi genetic material in synovial fluid from Lyme arthritis patients. J Infect Dis 1994;169:664-668. 
  36. Cimino GD, Metchette KC, Tessman JW, Hearst JE, Isaacs ST. Post-PCR sterilization: a method to control carryover contamination for the polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:99-107. [Free Full Text]
  37. Persing DH, Mathiesen D, Marshall WF, et al. Detection of Babesia microti by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2097-2103. [Free Full Text]
  38. Rahn DW, Malawista SE. Lyme disease: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:472-481.
  39. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases: treatment of Lyme borreliosis. Pediatrics 1991;88:176-179. [Erratum, Pediatrics 1991;88:840.] [Free Full Text]
  40. Garon CF, Dorward DW, Corwin MD. Structural features of Borrelia burgdorferi -- the Lyme disease spirochete: silver staining for nucleic acids. Scanning Microsc Suppl 1989;3:109-115. [Medline]
  41. Whitmire WM, Garon CF. Specific and nonspecific responses of murine B cells to membrane blebs of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 1993;61:1460-1467. [Free Full Text]
  42. Bergstrom S, Garon CF, Barbour AG, MacDougall J. Extrachromosomal elements of spirochetes. Res Microbiol 1992;143:623-628. [Medline]
  43. Aurelius E, Johansson B, Skoldenberg B, Staland A, Forsgren M. Rapid diagnosis of herpes simplex encephalitis by nested polymerase chain reaction assay of cerebrospinal fluid. Lancet 1991;337:189-192. [CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Rotbart HA, Levin MJ, Murphy NL, Abzug MJ. RNA target loss during solid phase hybridization of body fluids -- a quantitative study. Mol Cell Probes 1987;1:347-358. [CrossRef][Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.