The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:235-241 January 27, 1994 Number 4
NextNext

Electrical Alternans and Vulnerability to Ventricular Arrhythmias
David S. Rosenbaum, Lance E. Jackson, Joseph M. Smith, Hasan Garan, Jeremy N. Ruskin, and Richard J. Cohen

 

This Article
-Abstract

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Although electrical alternans (alternating amplitude from beat to beat on the electrocardiogram) has been associated with ventricular arrhythmias in many clinical settings, its physiologic importance and prognostic implications remain unknown.

Methods To test the hypothesis that electrical alternans is a marker of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias, we developed a technique to detect subtle alternation in the morphologic features of the electrocardiogram (which would not be detectable by visual inspection of the electrocardiogram). In a group of 83 patients referred for diagnostic electrophysiologic testing, we prospectively examined whether levels of alternans predicted vulnerability to arrhythmias as defined by the outcome of electrophysiologic testing and arrhythmia-free survival.

Results Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were induced during electrophysiologic testing in 32 of the patients (39 percent). In this group, low-level electrical alternans (a beat-to-beat change in amplitude of <15 microV) was detected over a broad range of physiologic heart rates (from 95 to 150 beats per minute) and primarily involved the ST segment and the T wave (i.e., the phase of repolarization). Alternans during repolarization was a significant and independent predictor of inducible arrhythmias on electrophysiologic testing (sensitivity, 81 percent; specificity, 84 percent; relative risk, 5.2). Of 66 patients followed for up to 20 months, 13 had arrhythmic events. Alternans affecting the T wave and inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias were significant and essentially equivalent predictors of survival without arrhythmia (P<0.001). Actuarial survival without arrhythmia at 20 months was significantly lower among the patients with T-wave alternans (19 percent) than among the patients without T-wave alternans (94 percent).

Conclusions Electrical alternans affecting the ST segment and T wave is common among patients at increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Subtle electrical alternans on the electrocardiogram may serve as a noninvasive marker of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias.


Although electrical alternans (alternating amplitude from beat to beat on the electrocardiogram) has remained an electrocardiographic curiosity for more than three quarters of a century,1,2,3,4 we have only recently recognized that it can be a harbinger of sudden cardiac death5,6,7. Electrical alternans can precede ventricular fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty8 or those with Prinzmetal's angina,9,10 the congenital prolonged QT syndrome,5,11 acute myocardial infarction,12,13 catecholamine excess,14,15 and electrolyte derangements16,17. These reports, though numerous, are largely anecdotal, and the prevalence and prognostic importance of alternans among the patients with these conditions or in the much larger group of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias due to chronic ischemic heart disease have not been systematically evaluated.

Using methods for analyzing the statistical properties of beat-to-beat fluctuations in the morphologic features of the electrocardiogram, we7,18 and others19,20 have confirmed that alternans affecting the T wave (i.e., T-wave or repolarization alternans) may be closely associated with the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs. Moreover, repolarization alternans in vivo that may be physiologically important can be subtle enough to preclude visual detection on the electrocardiogram yet readily measurable with appropriate techniques7. In the present study, we used a technique with the capacity to detect visually inapparent beat-to-beat oscillations of the surface electrocardiogram to test the hypothesis that repolarization alternans is a marker of vulnerability to arrhythmias in humans. If this hypothesis proves correct, electrical alternans measured from the surface electrocardiogram may ultimately serve as a noninvasive marker of susceptibility to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Methods

Study Design

All patients referred for diagnostic electrophysiologic testing were eligible for this study. Patients were excluded if atrial pacing was not possible (for example, because of atrial arrhythmias), if a permanent pacemaker had previously been implanted (to exclude secondary T-wave changes), or if excessive ventricular ectopic beats (>9 percent) were present. Electrical alternans was measured in 83 consecutive patients who met these entry criteria. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients.

To assess the relation between electrical alternans and susceptibility to inducible ventricular arrhythmias, base-line measurements of electrical alternans were compared with the results of base-line electrophysiologic testing in each patient. We also assessed the relation of electrical alternans to arrhythmia-free survival, which was assessed prospectively and was defined as the length of time from electrophysiologic testing until electrocardiographically documented sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or sudden cardiac death (as defined elsewhere21). To ensure that alternans and survival were assessed under comparable treatment conditions, the measurement of alternans used to predict survival in patients undergoing serial drug testing was the one obtained while the patients were receiving their long-term drug regimen. Of the 83 patients who entered this study, 17 were excluded from the survival analysis because antiarrhythmic-drug therapy was initiated or changed during the follow-up period.

Characteristics of the Patients

Sixty-nine of 83 patients underwent the base-line study while receiving no antiarrhythmic drugs. Most patients (76 percent) had organic heart disease, of which the majority of cases were due to coronary artery disease (Table 1). Forty of the 53 patients with documented coronary disease (75 percent) also had a history of myocardial infarction. Bundle-branch block was present in 23 patients.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the 83 Patients.

 
Measurements of Electrical Alternans

Patients were studied while fasting and lightly sedated. Seven silver-silver chloride electrocardiographic electrodes were positioned in a Frank orthogonal (XYZ) configuration22. Each lead was secured with a skin drill to ensure uniform impedance at all sites. Electrocardiographic signals were amplified (1 cm per millivolt) and filtered (band width, 0.01 Hz to 100 Hz) with a standard electrocardiographic recorder (Hewlett-Packard 7400A, Rockville, Md.) and were digitized (500 Hz with 12-bit resolution) in real time with customized data-acquisition software23.

Endocardial recording-stimulating catheters were inserted transvenously by standard techniques. To control for patient-to-patient variations in heart rate, electrical alternans was measured while the right atrium was paced at a rate as close to 100 beats per minute as possible (mean [±SD], 103 ±13). After five minutes of steady-state atrial pacing, 300 consecutive electrocardiographic complexes were recorded and analyzed for electrical alternans. Previously, we had found that five minutes is sufficient to ensure that alternans is not affected by the change in rate associated with the initiation of pacing24.

A technique for detecting alternans of electrocardiographic amplitude at the microvolt level7 was modified for clinical use in this study. The investigators performing the alternans analysis were blinded to the outcome of electrophysiologic testing. The analysis was performed with a Unix workstation (SUN Sparcstation, Mountain View, Calif.) on the magnitude of the electrocardiographic vector derived from the three orthogonal leads. The magnitude of the vector was used to reduce the effect of mechanical rotation of the heart22. Because of the sensitivity of this technique to subtle fluctuations in the morphologic features of the electrocardiogram, the computer algorithm selected 128 consecutive complexes so as to minimize the number of ectopic wave forms (such as premature ventricular contractions). Ectopic complexes that were included among the 128 beats analyzed were replaced by the averaged complex to maintain a consistent phase relation between consecutive beats.

Beat-to-beat fluctuations in electrocardiographic amplitude were represented as power spectra7 by calculating the squared magnitude of the fast Fourier transformation of beat-to-beat fluctuations in the amplitude of each sample point of the 128 time-aligned electrocardiographic complexes7. Power spectra calculated for each point within the QRS complex, ST segment, and T wave were then summed, and the final results were represented by three aggregate spectra corresponding to the sums over each of these intervals. A representative example of an aggregate T-wave power spectrum is shown in Figure 1 (3 of the 128 electrocardiographic complexes used to calculate the spectrum are shown in the inset). The spectrum depicts the frequencies at which beat-to-beat fluctuations in the amplitude of the T wave occur. For example, the spectral peak at the frequency of 0.1 cycle per beat corresponds to periodic fluctuations in T-wave amplitude that repeat every 10th beat. Similarly, the peak at 0.5 cycle per beat is due to fluctuations in T-wave amplitude on every other beat; hence, the magnitude of this peak is a direct measure of electrical alternans.


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Representative Example of the Use of a Computer Algorithm to Detect Low-Level Beat-to-Beat Oscillations of the Surface Morphology of the Electrocardiogram.

We used 128 consecutive electrocardiographic complexes recorded from three orthogonal leads to generate the representation of beat-to-beat oscillations in the amplitude of the electrocardiogram. The inset shows a segment of one electrocardiographic lead (X) from which the T-wave power spectrum was derived. T-wave alternans is measured from the amplitude of the peak of the power spectrum at the alternans frequency (0.5 cycle per beat) and is compared with the amplitude of the power spectrum measured in a predetermined noise window (see the Methods section). Despite the absence of any visible beat-to-beat alternation of T-wave amplitude (inset), a clear peak is evident at the alternans frequency that cannot be attributed to noise.

 
Electrical alternans was expressed as follows:

cumulative alternans voltage (in microvolts) = square root of (alternans peak - mean(noise)),

and alternans ratio = (alternans peak - mean(noise))/{sigma}noise)

with the mean (noise), standard deviation ({sigma}noise) of spectral noise estimated from a predefined noise window (Figure 1). Since the cumulative alternans voltage is derived from the aggregate spectra, it represents the square root of the spectral alternans voltages summed over all sample points in the defined electrocardiographic segment (QRS complex, ST segment, or T wave). The average alternans voltage may be obtained by dividing the cumulative alternans voltage by the square root of the number of sample points in the segment. For example, a 10-microV cumulative alternans voltage in a 150-msec T-wave segment sampled at intervals of 2 msec yields an average alternans voltage of (10 µV) / (150 msec x 0.5 sample points/msec) = 1.2 µV.

The alternans ratio reflects the extent to which the measured alternans exceeds the uncertainty (noise) of the measurement and conveys the statistical degree of confidence in the alternans measurement. Because the alternans ratio is influenced by ambient noise, our recording equipment and computer-analysis system were designed to produce consistently low noise levels, thus minimizing the likelihood that substantial alternans would be concealed by noise. Spectral noise levels were low and did not differ between patients with positive (noise level, 6.0 microV2) and negative (noise level, 5.7 microV2) electrophysiologic studies.

Electrophysiologic Studies

Recordings of electrical alternans were followed immediately by electrophysiologic testing. Up to three extrastimuli were delivered from up to two right ventricular sites. The number of extrastimuli and stimulation sites used were determined before each study without any knowledge of the patient's alternans levels; the decision was guided solely by the clinical indications for the study. A minimum of two extrastimuli were delivered from at least one ventricular site in all patients. Electrophysiologic tests were considered positive if sustained ventricular tachycardia (lasting more than 30 seconds or requiring termination because of hemodynamic collapse) or ventricular fibrillation was induced.

Statistical Analysis

In addition to electrical alternans, relevant clinical variables such as the patient's age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, findings on Holter recordings, cause of heart disease, indications for electrophysiologic study, and use of beta-blocking and antiarrhythmic drugs were analyzed with a multivariate stepwise logistic-regression model to identify independent predictors of inducible ventricular arrhythmias. The role of electrophysiologic testing and electrical alternans in predicting arrhythmia-free survival was evaluated with a Cox proportional-hazards technique (Research and Statistics Management, Bolt, Beranek and Newman Research Systems, Cambridge, Mass.). Data are expressed as means ±SD.

Results

Characteristics of Electrical Alternans

The algorithm used in this study was highly sensitive to subtle alternation in the amplitude of the electrocardiogram. As shown in Figure 1, despite the absence of any visible T-wave fluctuations on the surface electrocardiogram, the spectrum reveals a clear peak at the alternans frequency. Alternans was visually apparent in only 2 of 36 base-line electrophysiologic studies in which a statistically significant alternans peak was evident in the frequency spectrum. Electrical alternans was not uniformly distributed throughout all phases of the cardiac cycle. Typically, alternans involved the ST segment and, to a greater extent, the T wave, with relative sparing of the QRS complex (Figure 2).


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Representative Electrocardiogram (Top), with the Magnitude of Electrical Alternans (Bottom) Measured at Each Point of the QRS Complex (QRS), ST Segment (ST), and T Wave (T).

Electrical alternans is much more prominent during repolarization (T) than during depolarization (QRS). The alternans ratio reflects the extent to which measured alternans exceeds the uncertainty of the measurement (see the Methods section).

 
To determine whether electrical alternans is a rate-dependent phenomenon, we measured alternans at multiple stimulation rates in 10 patients. The magnitudes of ST-segment and T-wave alternans were constant over a broad range of rates (from 95 through 150 beats per minute). In contrast, QRS alternans increased at faster rates. Finally, bundle-branch block did not prevent the detection of alternans.

Characteristics of Inducible Arrhythmias

Thirty-nine percent of the patients had positive electrophysiologic studies (21 had sustained ventricular tachycardia and 11 had ventricular fibrillation). The mean length of the ventricular-tachycardia cycle was 297 ±65 msec. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was induced with single (10 percent), double (67 percent), and triple (23 percent) extrastimuli, whereas ventricular fibrillation was induced with double extrastimuli (45 percent) and triple extrastimuli (55 percent).

Predictors of Inducible Arrhythmias

Two independent and statistically significant groups of predictors of inducible ventricular arrhythmia were identified: repolarization alternans (i.e., ST-segment or T-wave alternans), and impaired left ventricular function (i.e., reduced left ventricular ejection fraction or a history of myocardial infarction). Predictors within each group were statistically interdependent. A quantitative relation was found between repolarization alternans and the results of electrophysiologic testing; that is, the magnitude of ST-segment and T-wave alternans directly correlated with the probability that ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation would be induced. QRS alternans was not a significant predictor of inducibility, nor were the cause of the heart disease, the patient's sex, the number of premature ventricular complexes on Holter recordings, or the use of beta-blocking agents.

Levels of T-wave alternans measured in patients with positive and negative electrophysiologic tests are compared in Figure 3. Median T-wave alternans ratios were significantly greater in patients in whom ventricular arrhythmias were induced than in patients without inducible arrhythmias (4.9 vs. 0.0, P = 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of alternans in predicting responses to programmed ventricular stimulation (Figure 3 and Table 2) were maximized by a T-wave alternans ratio of 2.5 (relative risk, 5.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 3.2 to 11.1) and a cumulative alternans voltage of 10 microV (relative risk, 5.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 10.9). Subgroup analysis of the 69 patients who underwent base-line electrophysiologic testing while receiving no antiarrhythmic drugs revealed a similar relation between the T-wave alternans ratio and susceptibility to inducible arrhythmias (P = 0.001).


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. T-Wave Alternans Ratios Measured during the Base-Line Electrophysiologic Study in Patients with and without Inducible Ventricular Arrhythmias.

The horizontal line (alternans ratio, 2.5) shows the level of alternans that maximally discriminates between the two patient groups. The data points shown at an alternans ratio of 1.0 signify values of 1.0 or less.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. T-Wave Alternans as a Predictor of Susceptibility to Inducible Ventricular Arrhythmia.

 
Multivariate analysis showed that repolarization alternans identified underlying electrical instability, independent of structural heart disease. In Figure 4, alternans is compared in three subgroups of patients: those with structurally normal hearts (none of whom had positive electrophysiologic studies) and those with structural heart disease who had either positive or negative electrophysiologic tests. Both groups of patients with structural heart disease had reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and a high prevalence of myocardial infarction; however, only those in whom arrhythmias could be induced had elevated alternans levels.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), Percentage of Patients with a History of Myocardial Infarction (MI), and Alternans Ratios in the ST Segment and T Wave in Subgroups of Patients.

Included in this analysis were 20 patients without organic heart disease (OHD), all of whom had negative electrophysiologic (EP) tests; 31 patients with OHD in whom ventricular arrhythmias could not be elicited by programmed stimulation during EP testing; and 32 patients with OHD who had positive EP tests. As expected, patients with organic heart disease had a lower LVEF and a higher prevalence of MI. The presence of OHD, by itself, was not associated with increased T-wave or ST-segment alternans ratios (i.e., alternans ratios >2.5). Alternans ratios were significantly elevated only in patients who were susceptible to inducible ventricular arrhythmias. Therefore, repolarization alternans was a marker of electrical and not mechanical cardiac dysfunction. The values shown are means +SE.

 
Repolarization Alternans and Arrhythmia-free Survival

Of 66 patients followed for up to 20 months, 13 had arrhythmic events (median time to event, 4.2 months; range, 1.0 to 19.4). Five of these events were sudden cardiac deaths; the remainder were documented ventricular arrhythmias. The anatomical and electrophysiologic substrate for arrhythmias may have been modified in some patients by coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 3), catheter ablation (n = 2), or map-guided aneurysmectomy (n = 1).

Levels of T-wave alternans were significantly greater (P = 0.01) in patients who had arrhythmic events (median alternans ratio, 5.2) than in patients without events (median alternans ratio, 0.7). On the basis of the results of an earlier pilot study of an independent patient population,7 patients were classified as "alternans-positive" if their T-wave alternans ratio exceeded 3.0. Alternans-positivity was associated with a markedly reduced rate of arrhythmia-free survival (relative risk, 9.0), since arrhythmia-free survival according to Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis decreased early in the follow-up period (Figure 5). By 20 months, arrhythmia-free survival was 19 percent among patients with T-wave alternans, as compared with 94 percent among patients without alternans (P<0.001). The use of a wider range of T-wave alternans ratios (from 1.5 to 4.6) to define alternans-positivity yielded similar results. Twenty-month arrhythmia-free survival in a subgroup of 45 patients who were not treated with antiarrhythmic drugs was similarly reduced among patients with T-wave alternans (44 percent, vs. 94 percent among patients without alternans; P = 0.005). Two patients fulfilled the criteria for sudden cardiac death,21 because they received shocks from internal defibrillators that were preceded by syncope. When determining survival rates after reclassifying these patients as "survivors" (so that the survival criteria were identical for patients with and without internal defibrillators), 20-month arrhythmia-free survival for alternans-positive patients was 32 percent and that for alternans-negative patients was 94 percent (P<0.001). Arrhythmia-free survival as predicted by electrophysiologic testing (Figure 5) was nearly identical to that predicted by the presence of T-wave alternans.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. T-Wave Alternans and Results of Electrophysiologic (EP) Testing in Relation to Arrhythmia-free Survival among 66 Patients.

In the left-hand panel, arrhythmia-free survival according to Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis is compared in patients with T-wave alternans (alternans ratio, >3.0) and without it (ratio, <= 3.0). Note that the presence of T-wave alternans is a strong predictor of reduced arrhythmia-free survival. In the right-hand panel, arrhythmia-free survival among patients with positive EP tests is compared with that among patients in whom ventricular arrhythmias were not induced on EP testing (negative EP test). The predictive value of EP testing and T-wave alternans is essentially the same in these plots.

 
Discussion

Since the early description of electrical alternans by Lewis,1 several hundred cases have been reported in association with an apparently disparate set of clinical and experimental conditions. With the exception of rare circumstances in which alternans is caused by mechanical motion of the heart within the thorax,25,26,27 conditions that provoke repolarization (i.e., ST-T wave) alternans have one common feature: they are arrhythmogenic. Hellerstein and Liebow3 were the first to suggest, on the basis of their studies in animals in 1950, that repolarization alternans is mechanistically linked to arrhythmogenesis. A pilot study by Smith et al.7 raised the possibility that alternans may also be a marker of vulnerability to clinical arrhythmias. In the present study, we systematically tested the hypothesis that electrical alternans is linked to the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias in humans.

In this study, we used a signal-processing technique to measure electrical alternans at a microvolt level. The sensitivity and reliability of this technique derive from its capacity to distinguish alternans-type fluctuations in the electrocardiogram from much larger fluctuations due to noise or to other physiologic fluctuations, such as respiration. The maximal level of T-wave alternans recorded in this study was only 116 microV, reaffirming the need for sensitive signal-processing techniques and explaining why alternans is not commonly recognized on standard electrocardiographic tracings4. Furthermore, our measurement technique does not simply indicate the presence or absence of alternans but determines the magnitude of alternans present in any electrocardiographic segment. This method was critical to our results, because alternans is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon. Instead, there is a continuum of proarrhythmic influence of electrical alternans.

Properties of Electrical Alternans

Although our patient population was diverse, several common properties of electrical alternans were evident. First, electrical alternans was present in a large majority of patients who had increased vulnerability to arrhythmias. Alternans of the ST segment or T wave (alternans ratio, >2.5) was present in 85 percent of patients with positive electrophysiologic tests. Second, alternans involved primarily the repolarization phases of the cardiac cycle (i.e., ST-T wave), and the magnitude of repolarization alternans was relatively insensitive to the heart rate. In contrast, alternans of the QRS complex was smaller in magnitude, did not correlate with vulnerability to arrhythmias, and was rate-dependent (QRS alternans was typically evident only at relatively rapid heart rates).

Repolarization Alternans and Vulnerability to Arrhythmia

A principal aim of this study was to establish the prognostic importance of electrical alternans in humans. As demonstrated previously, a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction28 and a history of myocardial infarction29 contributed in important ways to the inducibility of ventricular arrhythmia in our patients. Irrespective of left ventricular mechanical function, however, subtle alternation of the ST segment or T wave (i.e., repolarization alternans) was an independent marker of vulnerability to inducible ventricular arrhythmias and clinical arrhythmic events. Our findings are consistent with those of earlier experimental studies in which alternans of the electrocardiogram in dogs was found primarily to affect the T wave, was often in the microvolt range, and was closely related to ventricular electrical instability7,20.

In the current study, repolarization alternans was as effective as invasive electrophysiologic testing in predicting arrhythmic events. Although it would be premature to suggest that repolarization alternans be used as an alternative to electrophysiologic testing, our results suggest that repolarization alternans may be useful for evaluating several groups of patients. For example, screening patients with syncope might provide a means of identifying patients at high risk for arrhythmias who are suitable candidates for electrophysiologic testing. Indeed, among the 18 patients who presented with syncope in this study, 3 of the 5 who were positive for T-wave alternans also had positive electrophysiologic studies. In the absence of T-wave alternans, ventricular arrhythmias were induced in only 1 of 13 patients with syncope (P = 0.02).

Limitations of the Study

In this study, vulnerability to arrhythmia was defined in part by the outcome of electrophysiologic testing. Although highly predictive of arrhythmic events,30 electrophysiologic testing may not be an ideal gold standard, especially for patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and those in whom ventricular fibrillation can be induced. The inclusion of such patients was expected, since consecutive patients were tested in order to eliminate selection bias. These considerations obviously did not affect our data on arrhythmia-free survival, which was used as an independent and probably more relevant clinical end point for the assessment of vulnerability to arrhythmias. Since our experimental design required that we test patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies, the risk of arrhythmias in the study population was undoubtedly greater than that in the general population. This factor should be considered when our results are extrapolated to broader patient groups.

In our study alternans was measured during atrial pacing in order to eliminate any possible influence of heart rate or beat-to-beat variability in heart rate on measured T-wave alternans. To make the measurement of repolarization alternans a suitable test for ambulatory patients, improvements in the algorithm may be needed to compensate for fluctuations in heart rate associated with sinus rhythm.

Implications of the Study

Sudden cardiac death is the most devastating manifestation of cardiac disease, and accurate identification of the patients at greatest risk for sudden death remains the preeminent challenge to physicians who care for arrhythmia-prone patients. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction,28 Holter monitoring,31 and signal-averaged late potentials32 have become the principal noninvasive means of determining the risk of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. Unlike repolarization alternans, these measures of vulnerability to arrhythmias have previously been found to be less predictive of arrhythmic events than electrophysiologic testing30. Furthermore, the clinical value of any of these techniques is often limited in individual patients. For example, sustained ventricular arrhythmias are rarely observed during ambulatory monitoring, and ventricular ectopic activity is highly variable and unpredictable from day to day.

Signal averaging is applicable only to a limited patient population, since late potentials are not easily identified in the presence of conduction abnormalities such as bundle-branch block. Unlike signal averaging, electrical alternans is a measure of beat-to-beat changes in amplitude and not absolute amplitude. Hence, one would predict that bundle-branch block should not preclude its detection. In this study, electrical alternans was indeed detected in patients with bundle-branch block and bore the same relation to the results of electrophysiologic study and arrhythmia-free survival in those patients as in patients without bundle-branch block.

Our data indicate that repolarization alternans at the microvolt level can be successfully detected with existing technology and a commercially available electrocardiographic recorder. We have described a quantitative relation between repolarization alternans and vulnerability to arrhythmias, which could be exploited to define the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and determine which patients are most likely to benefit from invasive electrophysiologic testing. Further studies are required to clarify the pathophysiologic basis of electrical alternans and to determine whether its presence reflects an underlying disturbance of cardiac repolarization in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death.

Supported by a grant (R01-HL39291) from the National Institutes of Health and a fellowship from the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (to Dr. Rosenbaum).

Dr. Cohen is a consultant to, a director of, and an equity holder in Cambridge Heart, Inc., a company that has licensed technology for the measurement of electrical alternans. Dr. Ruskin is a consultant to Cambridge Heart, Inc., and has been granted the option to purchase equity in the company.

We are indebted to John B. Newell, Ph.D., for his expert assistance in the statistical analysis.


Source Information

From the Cardiac Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (D.S.R., H.G., J.N.R.); the Harvard University-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Mass. (D.S.R., L.E.J., J.M.S., R.J.C.); and the Departments of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (D.S.R.). Presented in part as the Samuel A. Levine Young Investigator Award presentation to the American Heart Association, Anaheim, Calif., Nov. 12, 1991.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Rosenbaum at the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Wickenden Bldg., Rm. 504, Cleveland, OH 44106.

References

  1. Lewis T. Notes upon alternation of the heart. Q J Med 1910;4:141-144. 
  2. Hamburger WW, Katz LN, Saphir O. Electrical alternans: a clinical study with a report of two necropsies. JAMA 1936;106:902-905. [Free Full Text]
  3. Hellerstein HK, Liebow IM. Electrical alternation in experimental coronary artery occlusion. Am J Physiol 1950;160:366-374. 
  4. Kalter HH, Schwartz ML. Electrical alternans. N Y State J Med 1948;1:1164-1166. 
  5. Schwartz PJ, Malliani A. Electrical alternation of the T-wave: clinical and experimental evidence of its relationship with the sympathetic nervous system and with the long Q-T syndrome. Am Heart J 1975;89:45-50. [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Raeder EA, Rosenbaum DS, Bhasin R, Cohen RJ. Alternating morphology of the QRST complex preceding sudden death. N Engl J Med 1992;326:271-272. [Medline]
  7. Smith JM, Clancy EA, Valeri CR, Ruskin JN, Cohen RJ. Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability. Circulation 1988;77:110-121. [Free Full Text]
  8. Joyal M, Feldman RL, Pepine CJ. ST-segment alternans during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:915-916. [CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Cheng TC. Electrical alternans: an association with coronary artery spasm. Arch Intern Med 1983;143:1052-1053. [Free Full Text]
  10. Kleinfeld MJ, Rozanski JJ. Alternans of the ST segment in Prinzmetal's angina. Circulation 1977;55:574-577. [Free Full Text]
  11. Hiejima K, Sano T. Electrical alternans of the TU wave in Romano-Ward syndrome. Br Heart J 1976;38:767-770. [Free Full Text]
  12. Puletti M, Curione M, Righetti G, Jacobellis G. Alternans of the ST segment and T wave in acute myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 1980;13:297-300. [CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Salerno JA, Previtali M, Panciroli C, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias during acute myocardial ischaemia in man: the role and significance of R-ST-T alternans and the prevention of ischaemic sudden death by medical treatment. Eur Heart J 1986;7:Suppl A:63-75.
  14. Lepeschkin E. Electrocardiographic observations on the mechanisms of the electrical alternans of the heart. Cardiologia 1950;16:278-287.
  15. Wayne VS, Bishop RL, Spodick DH. Exercise-induced ST segment alternans. Chest 1983;83:824-825. [Free Full Text]
  16. Reddy CVR, Kiok JP, Khan RG, El-Sherif N. Repolarization alternans associated with alcoholism and hypomagnesemia. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:390-391. [CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Shimoni Z, Flatau E, Schiller D, Barzilay E, Kohn D. Electrical alternans of giant U waves with multiple electrolyte deficits. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:920-921. [CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Adam DR, Smith JM, Akselrod S, Nyberg S, Powell AO, Cohen RJ. Fluctuations in T-wave morphology and susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation. J Electrocardiol 1984;17:209-218. [Medline]
  19. Konta T, Ikeda K, Yamaki M, et al. Significance of discordant ST alternans in ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 1990;82:2185-2189. [Free Full Text]
  20. Nearing BD, Huang AH, Verrier RL. Dynamic tracking of cardiac vulnerability by complex demodulation of the T wave. Science 1991;252:437-440. [Free Full Text]
  21. Wilber DJ, Garan H, Finkelstein D, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: use of electrophysiologic testing in the prediction of long-term outcome. N Engl J Med 1988;318:19-24. [Abstract]
  22. Frank E. An accurate, clinically practical system for spatial vectorcardiography. Circulation 1956;3:737-749. 
  23. Lebrett K. Real-time data acquisition and analysis of electrocardiographic data. (Masters thesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990).
  24. Rosenbaum DS, Kaplan DT. Kanai A, et al. Repolarization inhomogeneities in ventricular myocardium change dynamically with abrupt cycle length shortening. Circulation 1991;84:1333-1345. [Free Full Text]
  25. Ghani MF, Parker BM. Hypotension, heart block and reversed pulsus alternans in a patient with hypertrophic subaortic stenosis following digitalis and diuretic therapy. Chest 1974;65:695-698. [Free Full Text]
  26. Feigenbaum H, Zaky A, Grabhorn LL. Cardiac motion in patients with pericardial effusion: a study using reflected ultrasound. Circulation 1966;34:611-619. [Free Full Text]
  27. Usher BW, Popp RL. Electrical alternans: mechanism in pericardial effusion. Am Heart J 1972;83:459-463. [CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Kleiger R, Miller JP, Rolnitzky LM. The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1984;69:250-258. [Free Full Text]
  29. Kleiman RB, Miller JM, Buxton AE, Josephson ME, Marchlinski FE. Prognosis following sustained ventricular tachycardia occurring early after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:528-533. [CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Richards DAB, Byth K, Ross DL, Uther JB. What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction? Circulation 1992;83:756-763. [Free Full Text]
  31. Winkle RA. Ambulatory electrocardiography and the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of chronic ventricular arrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1980;23:99-128. [CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, Sammel NL. Late potentials detected after myocardial infarction: natural history and prognostic significance. Circulation 1986;74:1280-1289. [Free Full Text]

 

This Article
-Abstract

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.