The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 331:1752-1755 December 29, 1994 Number 26
NextNext

Habitually Wandering Patients
Loren Pankratz, and James Jackson

 

This Article
-Abstract

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Physicians are sometimes confronted with patients who gain admission to one hospital after another, sometimes referred to as "wandering patients." Little is known about the presenting symptoms of these patients, their use of hospital resources, or the costs of their medical care. We analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of wandering patients served by Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs).

Methods For each patient they admit, all 159 hospitals in the Veterans Affairs medical system submit demographic and diagnostic information to a central data base at the Data Processing Center in Austin, Texas. We searched these records to identify patients who were admitted to four or more VAMCs within each year from fiscal year 1988 through 1992. Patients so identified in any one year were called "wanderers"; those identified in all five years were designated "habitual wanderers."

Results We identified 1013 wanderers in 1988. The number gradually declined each year to 729 in 1992. In 1991 there were 810 wandering patients, who averaged about eight admissions per year and more than 100 days of inpatient care; they accounted for about $26.5 million in costs for inpatient and outpatient care in that year. Only 35 patients wandered in all five years from 1988 through 1992. The most common discharge diagnoses of these 35 men were related to substance abuse (mostly alcoholism) and mental disorders. Their 2268 admissions and 7832 outpatient visits cost an estimated $6.5 million over the five-year period.

Conclusions Patients who are repeatedly admitted to different hospitals -- wandering patients -- accumulate high numbers of admissions, cause diagnostic confusion, and receive uncoordinated care. Because of the complexity of their disorders, such patients require case management on a regional or national basis.


Clinicians have known for many years that some patients with psychiatric disorders move continually from state to state.1,2 We have reported a wandering style associated with factitious post-traumatic stress disorder,3 drug seeking,4 Munchausen's syndrome,5 and admissions of patients from outside a hospital's referral area.6 "Wandering" patients -- who often had complex disorders -- did not usually receive recommended follow-up care because their travels took them to distant facilities where their history was unknown and because care givers did not know where or how to contact their next providers.

Advances in telecommunications have widened access to the comprehensive administrative data bases of the Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. This information has been of clinical value, especially in identifying previous hospitalizations not reported by patients. We used the Veterans Affairs data bases to determine the prevalence of such wandering behavior, the clinical characteristics of wandering patients, and the costs associated with their care in the Veterans Affairs health system.

Methods

The Department of Veterans Affairs manages the largest health care system in the United States. Each year about 2.6 million veterans, an estimated 10 percent of the total number, receive care from the 159 Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs), 128 nursing homes, 35 residential care facilities (domiciliary units), and 191 community clinics located throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines.

In 1992, 542,894 veterans accounted for a total of 922,514 admissions to Veterans Affairs hospitals; 97.4 percent of these patients were men, and 64 percent were 55 years of age or older. Nearly 40 percent were veterans of World War II, and 26.6 percent were Vietnam veterans.

Patients

In this study a "wandering patient" was defined as someone with admissions to four or more Veterans Affairs hospitals in one year. "Habitually wandering patients" had admissions to four or more hospitals in every year of the study, from 1988 through 1992. Admission to four hospitals was used as the threshold in order to eliminate interhospital referrals and patient relocations unrelated to wandering behavior.

Sources of Data

Every Veterans Affairs facility must submit extensive information on every contact with a patient to the Veterans Affairs Data Processing Center in Austin, Texas. A master record, the Patient Treatment File (PTF), is maintained in an SAS software data base for every hospital admission; this record includes 67 categories of information (fields), including demographic and identifying variables and data on clinical care. There is a similar data base for Veterans Affairs nursing homes and residential care facilities. A third data base contains information submitted each year on about 21 million outpatient visits.

We searched the hospital PTFs for each fiscal year from 1988 through 1992 for social security numbers associated with discharges from four or more hospitals. We created data files, containing all the variables in each record, on the patients thus identified for each year. We created separate files that included information on patients who had wandered in all five years (habitual wanderers); we added information on any admissions of these patients to nursing homes and residential care facilities for the five-year period in order to obtain a comprehensive profile of their use of Veterans Affairs resources.

The annual Veterans Affairs National Cost Distribution Report was used to determine the costs of providing care to wandering and habitually wandering patients. This report presents total costs for various types of patient care (intensive care units, surgical wards, medical outpatient clinics, and so on) and allocates per diem and per visit costs in these service areas. For 1991 these costs were as follows: $254 per day for acute psychiatric care, $475 per day for care in medical wards, and $1,146 per day for medical intensive care.

To supplement the clinical information available from the PTFs, we retrieved approximately five discharge summaries from different hospitals for each of 10 habitually wandering patients.

Results

Wandering Patients

In fiscal year 1988, there were 1013 patients with a record of admission to four or more VAMCs. The number decreased steadily over the years until 1992, when only 729 patients met our definition of wandering patients. Table 1 shows the number of wandering patients each year in the context of decreasing admissions to the Veterans Affairs medical system as a whole.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Mean Number of Discharges per Patient and Mean Length of Stay for the General Veterans Affairs Patient Population and Wandering Patients, 1988 through 1992.

 
In 1991, for example, 810 wanderers accumulated 6266 inpatient admissions, about the same number as the Baltimore and the Cincinnati Veterans Affairs hospitals each recorded in total admissions for 1991. Wanderers were admitted an average of 7.7 times, as compared with 1.7 for other patients with an admission in 1991. Their mean length of stay was shorter, however, probably because of their frequent irregular discharges (signing out against medical advice or simply leaving the hospital). In 1991, 30.7 percent of the admissions of wanderers terminated in an irregular discharge, as compared with a national average of 4.3 percent for Veterans Affairs patients.

These 810 patients were responsible for 0.66 percent of the total admissions to Veterans Affairs facilities in 1991 but for 2.8 percent of all admissions for acute psychiatric care. At one hospital they accounted for 3.4 percent of the total admissions. Forty-four hospitals admitted one of these patients an average of once a week. In addition to the 6266 admissions, the 810 wandering patients accumulated 22,600 outpatient visits.

The 810 wandering patients accounted for about $25 million in inpatient care and about $1.5 million in outpatient care in 1991 on the basis of the 1991 National Cost Distribution Report.

Habitual Wanderers

About 20 to 25 percent of the wandering patients in any given year continued their peripatetic behavior for a second year. Only 35 patients (about 3 percent) of the 1013 identified as wandering in 1988 maintained this pattern for five years. All these "habitual wanderers" were men, and they had a mean age of 49 years (range, 32 to 72). They averaged about 13 admissions per year, accumulating 20,796 days of inpatient care over the five years from 1988 through 1992 (an average of 119 days per patient per year) (Table 2). In addition to 2268 admissions, they accounted for 7832 outpatient visits.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Discharges, Irregular Discharges, Days of Inpatient Care, and Mean Length of Stay According to the Type of Ward or Facility at Discharge for 35 Habitually Wandering Patients, 1988 through 1992.

 
Over half (50.4 percent) of the admissions of the habitual wanderers terminated with an irregular discharge. The 79 admissions to nursing homes and residential care facilities ended in an even higher rate of irregular discharge (73.4 percent). The single patient with the most admissions also had the highest percentage of irregular discharges, with 87 percent of his 142 admissions terminating irregularly.

Analysis of diagnosis-related group (DRG) codes suggested that about half the 2268 admissions of the habitual wanderers were related to substance abuse (Table 3). The most common DRG code (26.5 percent) was the irregular discharge of a substance-abusing patient (code 433).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Discharges for 35 Habitually Wandering Patients, According to DRG Categories, 1988 through 1992.

 
Sixteen patients were discharged with diagnoses almost exclusively related to substance abuse (mostly alcoholism). Eight patients were discharged with diagnoses related mostly to mental disorders; the second most common DRG code (26.4 percent) was related to psychosis (code 430). For five patients the diagnoses were a combination of substance abuse and mental disorders. For three patients the discharge diagnoses were related mostly to cardiac disease, and three patients were discharged with a spectrum of medical, psychiatric, and substance-abuse problems. Table 4 lists the primary discharge diagnoses of one such patient with medical, psychiatric, and substance-abuse problems; it shows the variability in the labeling of his psychiatric condition during a 2 1/2-year period of travel.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Locations of Admissions and Discharge Diagnoses of One Habitually Wandering Patient.

 
Medical costs for habitually wandering patients were calculated on the basis of the 1992 National Cost Distribution Report. Inpatient services were valued at $1.2 million a year in 1992 dollars; outpatient costs based on the number of clinic visits totaled over $100,000 per year. Thus, we estimate that these 35 habitual wanderers consumed more than $6.5 million worth of medical care provided by VAMCs during the five years of this study.

Discussion

The habitually wandering patients we identified averaged more than one hospital admission per month for five years. By comparison, Geller,7 in a survey of state mental hospitals, identified 108 chronically mentally ill patients with a lifetime mean of 31 admissions (range, 5 to 121). The mean for our group of habitual wanderers was twice that number (64.8 admissions per patient; range, 27 to 142) for a five-year period. In a study of patients repeatedly admitted to general hospitals for physical symptoms without an organic basis, Fink8 identified 56 subjects with a lifetime median of 22 admissions, equivalent to about one third of the admissions of our habitually wandering group during a five-year period.

Habitual wanderers were in a Veterans Affairs hospital for nearly one third of the five-year period covered by our study. They were admitted to 151 different VAMCs and had a considerable effect on some. Two medium-sized hospitals, one in the East and one in the South, had 69 and 70 admissions, respectively, of habitually wandering patients.

Homelessness has been proposed as an explanation for some so-called revolving-door patients.9,10 However, the high rates of irregular discharges from nursing homes and residential care facilities among the habitual wanderers we identified suggest that homelessness is not an adequate explanation for their transient style. Hospitals may be the preferred living situation for some patients who need structure, support, and basic amenities when faced with social problems,11 but habitual wanderers have a more complex problem of maladjustment characterized by impulsivity, transient styles, substance abuse, defects in reality testing, and character disorders.12,13,14,15,16 It is not surprising, therefore, that they can cause diagnostic confusion.

Diagnostic confusion and rapid readmissions, in turn, suggest ineffective treatment and inappropriate use of hospital resources.17 Unfortunately, quality-assurance screening programs disregard readmissions to other facilities because of logistic problems in tracking. Generally, eligible veterans can seek care in a VAMC without the staff's knowing about their previous admissions.

Small numbers of patients consume large proportions of health care expenditures.8,18 Programs concentrating on these patients can be cost effective even when they lead to only a minor reduction in admissions.15,18,19,20 Attention to wandering patients could reduce unnecessary services while addressing their medically dependent lifestyle. Indeed, the Department of Veterans Affairs has a legal responsibility to provide safe care that is coordinated among their own facilities (Nagan J, Veterans Affairs Western Regional Counsel: personal communication).

Some case-management programs designed for resistant patients have been successful.15,21,22 However, patients who continually move about the country present problems never addressed previously. A single data base for all Veterans Affairs facilities would provide an integrated record for each patient, regardless of the location of the facility where care was sought. Clinicians would benefit from having even simple information about patients' use of resources in different facilities. Such a system is possible for the Department of Veterans Affairs, but the technology is not yet readily available. More important, wandering patients who have clinical needs that are not being met would be better served by regional or national case management.


Source Information

From the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (L.P., J.J.) and the Departments of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Oregon Health Sciences University (L.P.), Portland.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Pankratz at the Psychology Service (116B), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, P.O. Box 1034, Portland, OR 97207.

References

  1. Gordon RE, Lyons H, Muniz C, Most B. The migratory disabled veteran. J Fla Med Assoc 1973;60:27-30. 
  2. Gordon RE, Webb S. The orbiting psychiatric patient. J Fla Med Assoc 1975;62:21-25. 
  3. Sparr L, Pankratz LD. Factitious posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1983;140:1016-1019. [Free Full Text]
  4. Pankratz L, Hickam DH, Toth S. The identification and management of drug-seeking behavior in a medical center. Drug Alcohol Depend 1989;24:115-118. [CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Pankratz L. Patient deception as a healthcare risk. Perspect Healthcare Risk Manage 1989;9(2):5-8.
  6. Pankratz L, Lipkin J. The transient patient in a psychiatric ward: summering in Oregon. J Operation Psychiatry 1978;9(1):42-7.
  7. Geller JL. A report on the "worst" state hospital recidivists in the U.S. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1992;43:904-908.
  8. Fink P. Admission patterns of persistent somatization patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1993;15:211-218. [CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Geller JL. A historical perspective on the role of state hospitals viewed from the era of the "revolving door." Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:1526-1533. [Free Full Text]
  10. Victor CR, Connelly J, Roderick P, Cohen C. Use of hospital services by homeless families in an inner London health district. BMJ 1989;299:725-727.
  11. Drake RE, Wallach MA. Mental patients' attraction to the hospital: correlates of living preference. Community Ment Health J 1992;28:5-12. [CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Schwartz SR, Goldfinger SM. The new chronic patient: clinical characteristics of an emerging subgroup. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1981;32:470-474. [Free Full Text]
  13. Surles RC, McGurrin MC. Increased use of psychiatric emergency services by young chronic mentally ill patients. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1987;38:401-405. [Free Full Text]
  14. Caton CL. The new chronic patient and the system of community care. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1981;32:475-478. [Free Full Text]
  15. Buckley R, Bigelow DA. The multi-service network: reaching the unserved multi-problem individual. Community Ment Health J 1992;28:43-50. [CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Pepper B, Kirshner MC, Ryglewicz H. The young adult chronic patient: overview of a population. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1981;32:463-469. [Free Full Text]
  17. Durance PW, Gibson TB, Davis-Sacks ML, Homan RK. Multifacility utilization by the chronically mentally ill in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Ment Health Admin 1992;19:178-94.
  18. Hadley TR, McGurrin MC, Pulice RT, Holohean EJ. Using fiscal data to identify heavy service users. Psychiatr Q 1990;61:41-48. [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Anderson GF, Steinberg EP. Hospital readmissions in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1349-1353. [Abstract]
  20. Rosenheck R, Massari L, Frisman L. Who should receive high-cost mental health treatment and for how long? Schizophr Bull 1993;19:843-852.
  21. Mechanic D, Aiken LH. Improving the care of patients with chronic mental illness. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1634-1638. [Medline]
  22. McLean EK, Leibowitz J. A community mental health team to serve revolving door patients: the Doddington Edward Wilson (DEW) Mental Health Team 1984-1988. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1990;36:172-182.

 

This Article
-Abstract

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Wandering Patients in the Veterans Affairs System
Howard M. O., Walker R. D., Suchinsky R. T., Turner T. A., Engel A. G., Finkelstein A. S., Engel P. A., Pankratz L., Jackson J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1582-1584, Jun 8, 1995. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.