The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 332:69-74 January 12, 1995 Number 2
NextNext

Prevalence of Low Birth Weight and Preterm Delivery in Relation to the Interval between Pregnancies among White and Black Women
James S. Rawlings, M.D., Virginia B. Rawlings, R.D., M.S.P.H., and John A. Read, M.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The higher mortality rate among black infants than among white infants in the United States results largely from the greater frequency of low birth weight and prematurity among black infants. Higher rates of low birth weight and preterm delivery have been associated with shorter intervals between pregnancies.

Methods We studied a racially mixed population of women in military families, who had access to free, high-quality health care. A total of 1922 white and black women had two consecutive, singleton pregnancies during the study period. We determined the outcome of the second of each pair of pregnancies and the length of time between the pregnancies.

Results Short interpregnancy intervals (calculated from delivery to the next conception) were more frequent among black than among white women. A total of 7.7 percent of the 298 black women and 3.2 percent of the 1628 white women delivered premature, low-birth-weight infants (P<0.001). Among the black women, an interpregnancy interval of less than nine months was associated with a significantly greater prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight in the neonates (11.6 percent, vs. 4.4 percent for longer interpregnancy intervals; P = 0.020). Among the white women, only intervals of less than three months between pregnancies were associated with a greater prevalence of prematurity and low birth weight in the infants (11.8 percent vs. 2.8 percent; P<0.001). Of the black women, 46.3 percent had interpregnancy intervals of less than nine months; 4.2 percent of the white women had interpregnancy intervals of less than three months.

Conclusions A short interval between pregnancies is a risk factor for low birth weight and preterm delivery, and such intervals are more common among black than among white women. The relative frequency of intervals of less than nine months between pregnancies may be an important factor in the wide disparity in pregnancy outcomes between white and black women in the United States.


In the United States, mortality among black infants is currently twice that among white infants.1 This disparity is strongly linked to the two-to-threefold greater prevalence of low birth weight and prematurity among black infants.2 Mortality directly attributable to low birth weight and preterm delivery occurs 4.5 times more frequently among black infants than among white infants.1 These disparities in pregnancy outcome have been attributed in large part to wide differences between the races in socioeconomic status and the associated effects on maternal health and access to preventive health care.3,4,5,6

These demographic differences are greatly attenuated among U.S. military personnel and their dependents, who have guaranteed access, at no cost, to high-quality health care. Mortality rates among black infants approach those among white infants in the ethnically diverse military population served by our medical center.7 However, higher rates of low birth weight and preterm birth persist among black infants in this population.

An increased prevalence of unfavorable pregnancy outcomes, including low birth weight and preterm delivery, has been reported to be associated with intervals of less than six months between pregnancies.8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 We hypothesized that the persistent interracial differences in pregnancy outcomes at our medical center might result in part from differences in the spacing of pregnancies. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the relation of the interval between pregnancies to the outcome of the second of two consecutive, singleton pregnancies with the same partner among women who delivered their babies at our medical center from July 1983 through June 1993.

Methods

Pairs of pregnancies were identified by matching the mother's social security number, first and last names, and number of pregnancies, as documented in medical records and institutional birth logs. Pairs of pregnancies with intervening live births or fetal loss and pregnancies with multiple gestation were excluded. Race was determined by asking the women for this information.

The interpregnancy interval was defined as the length of time from the first delivery to the next conception, calculated as the interval between consecutive deliveries minus the gestational age of the second child at birth. Intervals were computed in weeks and were converted to months (13 weeks = 3 months). Low birth weight was defined as a birth weight of less than 2.5 kg. Gestational ages were estimated according to standard obstetrical dating criteria, with clinical confirmation by the Ballard method for the assessment of gestational age.19 Preterm delivery was defined as delivery before 37 completed weeks of gestation. Intrauterine growth retardation was considered present in infants whose birth weights were below the 10th percentile for gestational age of all infants delivered at the medical center during the study period.

The statistical methods used in the study included the chi-square test, Student's t-test, and stepwise logistic-regression analysis.20,21 All P values are two-tailed. The study was conducted to identify patterns of differences between the races in the prevalence of pregnancy outcomes likely to result in an increased risk of infant mortality. Thus, comparisons of outcomes among the white and black women focused on the prevalence of preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant.

Results

The entry criteria were met by 2115 women with pairs of pregnancies; 1624 (76.8 percent) of the women were white, 298 (14.1 percent) were black, and 193 (9.1 percent) were of other races. Only the white and black women (total, 1922) are included in this report. The white women were similar to the black women in age and parity at the time of the second delivery. The mean family income among the black women was one Government Service pay grade (approximately 10 percent) lower than that among the white women. As a group, the women with interpregnancy intervals of less than six months were younger and had lower family incomes than the women with longer intervals between pregnancies (Table 1).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics and Obstetrical Risk Factors among the Women, According to Race and Interpregnancy Interval.

 
The prevalence of several recognized risk factors for unfavorable pregnancy outcome varied with the mother's race. A greater proportion of black women (9.4 percent) than white women (3.4 percent) were unmarried at the time of the second delivery (P<0.001). Conversely, a greater proportion of white women (20.4 percent) than black women (14.4 percent) smoked during the second pregnancy (P = 0.017). Within each racial group, the proportions of unmarried women and women who smoked did not differ between those with interpregnancy intervals of less than six months and those with longer intervals (Table 1).

There was no interracial difference in the proportion of women who first received prenatal care after the completion of the first trimester of pregnancy. The prevalence of pregnancy-induced hypertension did not differ between the races and was similar among the women with interpregnancy intervals of less than six months and those with longer intervals. The only obstetrical complication that was more frequent among women with interpregnancy intervals of less than six months than among those with longer intervals was preterm labor; this difference was significant only among the black women (Table 1).

A greater proportion of black women (14.1 percent) than white women (8.8 percent) had delivered low-birth-weight or preterm infants in the first of the paired pregnancies (P = 0.004). This risk factor was less common among white women with interpregnancy intervals of six months or more than among those with shorter intervals. There was no interracial difference in the prevalence of this risk factor among women with interpregnancy intervals of less than six months.

The prevalence of intrauterine growth retardation was 15.8 percent among the black women and 6.2 percent among the white women (P<0.001). Within each racial group, the prevalence of intrauterine growth retardation did not differ significantly between the women with interpregnancy intervals of less than six months and those with longer intervals (Table 2).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Prevalence of Intrauterine Growth Retardation and Preterm Delivery and Low Birth Weight, According to Race and Interpregnancy Interval.

 
The frequency distribution of interpregnancy intervals among black women was strongly shifted toward shorter intervals, as compared with that among white women (Figure 1). Intervals of less than six months occurred between the pregnancies of 29.9 percent of the black women, as compared with 17.6 percent of the white women (P<0.001).


View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Frequency Distribution of Intervals between Pregnancies among White and Black Women.

The distribution among black women is strongly shifted toward shorter intervals than among white women.

 
Premature, low-birth-weight infants were born to 7.7 percent of the black women, as compared with 3.2 percent of the white women (P<0.001; relative risk, 2.41; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.45 to 4.00). These race-specific rates were similar to those among all other multiparous women who delivered at our medical center during the study period. In the study population, the prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight was 14.6 percent among the infants born to black women with interpregnancy intervals of less than six months, as compared with 4.8 percent among the infants born to black women with longer intervals between pregnancies (P = 0.004; relative risk, 3.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.28 to 7.26). Among the white women, these rates did not differ significantly between the women with interpregnancy intervals of less than six months and those with longer intervals (Table 2).

In order to determine more accurately the interpregnancy intervals at which the prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight begins to change significantly, we reanalyzed the data according to ranges of three-month increments in the interpregnancy interval (Table 3). Within each racial group, the prevalence of low birth weight and prematurity was compared between women with interpregnancy intervals in each range and all the women with longer intervals. Among the black women, the longest interval associated with significantly increased rates of preterm delivery and low birth weight was less than 9 months (11.6 percent, as compared with 4.4 percent for >9 months; P = 0.020; relative risk, 2.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 6.65). Among the white women, the longest interval associated with significantly increased rates was less than 3 months (11.8 percent, as compared with 2.8 percent for >3 months; P<0.001; relative risk, 4.16; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.88 to 9.22). These disadvantageous interpregnancy intervals occurred among 138 (46.3 percent) of the black women (<9 months) and 68 (4.2 percent) of the white women (<3 months).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Prevalence of Preterm Delivery and Low Birth Weight According to Race and Interpregnancy Interval.

 
The number of premature, low-birth-weight infants born to the black women in excess of the number expected on the basis of the prevalence among white women was computed for three-month increments in the interpregnancy interval. Over 85 percent of the excess rate occurred among women with interpregnancy intervals of less than nine months. There were no interracial differences in the prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight among women with interpregnancy intervals of less than three months or among those with intervals of nine months or more (Figure 2).


View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Prevalence of Preterm Delivery and Low-Birth-Weight Offspring among White and Black Women, According to Interval between Pregnancies.

The race-specific prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight was similar among women with interpregnancy intervals of less than three months (11.8 percent for white women and 12.9 percent for black women) and among those with intervals of nine months or more (3.2 percent and 4.4 percent, respectively).

 
The first of the paired pregnancies of 185 white and black women were complicated by low birth weight or preterm delivery (Table 4). This outcome was closely linked with preterm delivery and low birth weight in the second of the two pregnancies (P<0.001; relative risk, 10.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 6.43 to 17.02). When these high-risk women were excluded from the analysis, the prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight decreased in both racial groups (Table 4). The differences between and within the racial groups in the prevalence of low birth weight and preterm delivery according to the interpregnancy interval were similar to those for the group as a whole, with the exception that the difference in prevalence between white women with interpregnancy intervals of less than three months and white women with longer intervals was no longer statistically significant. The difference in prevalence between black women with interpregnancy intervals of less than nine months and black women with longer intervals remained significant (8.5 percent and 2.2 percent, respectively; P = 0.020; relative risk, 3.96; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 14.75).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Prevalence of Preterm Delivery and Low Birth Weight, According to Race, Obstetrical History, and Interpregnancy Interval.

 
Among the infants born to white women at high risk, the prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight was 46.2 percent for the group with interpregnancy intervals of less than three months, as compared with 17.7 percent for those with longer intervals (P = 0.015; relative risk, 2.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.80 to 8.49). Among the infants born to black women in the high-risk group, the number of subjects was insufficient to show any clear relation between interpregnancy interval and the outcome of pregnancy.

We performed a stepwise logistic-regression analysis to gauge the relative strength of the associations between 10 obstetrical risk factors (independent variables) and the prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight within each racial group (dependent variable). Maternal age below 21 years and family Government Service pay grade below 5 (income below $1,200 per month) had been previously recognized as obstetrical risk factors in the population served by our medical center. Unmarried status, smoking during pregnancy, late entry into prenatal care, and a history of low birth weight or preterm delivery in the previous pregnancy are recognized obstetrical risk factors. Four categories of short interpregnancy interval (<3 months, <6 months, <9 months, and <12 months) were also selected as risk factors. Among white women, the strongest predictor of low birth weight and preterm delivery in the second pregnancy was a history of low birth weight or preterm delivery in the first (P<0.001, r = 0.56), followed by an interpregnancy interval of less than three months (P<0.001, r = 0.18) and smoking during pregnancy (P = 0.025, r = 0.08). When the obstetrical history was excluded, the leading predictors were late entry into prenatal care (P = 0.006, r = 0.11) and an interpregnancy interval of less than three months (P = 0.006, r = 0.11). Among black women, the strongest predictor of low birth weight and preterm delivery was also a history of low birth weight or preterm delivery (P<0.001, r = 0.31), followed by an interpregnancy interval of less than six months (P = 0.004, r = 0.20) and an interpregnancy interval of less than nine months (P = 0.020, r = 0.14). When the obstetrical history was excluded, the leading risk factors were an interpregnancy interval of less than six months (P = 0.002, r = 0.21) and an interpregnancy interval of less than nine months (P = 0.023, r = 0.14).

In the study population as a whole, the rate of infant mortality directly attributable to illness related to preterm delivery was 1 in 298 live births (3.4 per 1000) among black infants, similar to that among white infants (5 in 1624 live births, or 3.1 per 1000). Among the infants born to women with interpregnancy intervals of less than nine months, in contrast, this rate was 1 in 138 births (7.2 per 1000) for black infants and 2 in 542 births (3.7 per 1000) for white infants. This difference was not statistically significant because of the small number of infant deaths in each racial group. A power analysis revealed that this difference would become significant if the study were continued until the study population reached four times its current size.

Discussion

Many investigators have proposed an epidemiologic link between short intervals between pregnancies and unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. The majority have reported an increased prevalence of low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation in association with short intervals between pregnancies.8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 An increased prevalence of preterm delivery and increased perinatal mortality have also been linked to short interpregnancy intervals.22,23,24

A hypothetical "critical" interpregnancy interval has been proposed, indicating the threshold for significant increases in the prevalence of unfavorable outcomes. This critical interval has varied among published reports, ranging from 6 months in developed, industrialized nations to 18 months or longer in developing countries. The mechanism of the putative adverse effect of short interpregnancy intervals has not been determined. The leading theory involves the incomplete restoration of physiologically critical nutrient reserves in the mother that are depleted in the course of the preceding pregnancy.25,26

A short interpregnancy interval is not universally accepted as an important, independent risk factor for unfavorable pregnancy outcomes, however. Several investigators have noted that short intervals are frequently linked to other accepted obstetrical risk factors, such as unfavorable outcomes of previous pregnancies, poverty, young maternal age, and tobacco use during pregnancy.27,28,29,30,31 A small number of studies have shown little or no linkage between short interpregnancy intervals and unfavorable pregnancy outcomes when the subjects were selected according to criteria designed to control for these confounding variables.32,33 Race-specific outcomes among these selected subjects were not reported.

The population we investigated was drawn from a larger population — military personnel and their families — that has been shown to have far lower mortality rates for black infants than are reported for the United States as a whole.7 The quality of prenatal care and access to and use of such care were comparable among the study subjects, who were representative of the larger military population with respect to obstetrical outcomes. The subjects were not screened for obstetrical risk factors, and race-specific differences in the prevalence of several obstetrical risk factors were identified. Multivariate analysis revealed that among these risk factors, a short interpregnancy interval was exceeded only by a history of poor outcome in the preceding pregnancy as a predictor of preterm delivery and low birth weight.

In contrast to other reports, our findings do not support a relation between an increased prevalence of intrauterine growth retardation and a short interpregnancy interval. This lack of correlation may result from the fact that in our study, infants with growth retardation were identified with an intrauterine-growth curve derived from the population under study.

Our findings reveal a clear association among black women between interpregnancy intervals of less than nine months and a significantly higher prevalence of preterm delivery of low-birth-weight infants. This relation was independent of the increased prevalence of intrauterine growth retardation among black infants and persisted when women at high risk because of unfavorable outcomes in the preceding pregnancy were excluded. Nearly half the black women enrolled in the study had interpregnancy intervals of less than nine months.

A link between short interpregnancy intervals and unfavorable pregnancy outcomes was also observed among the white women, but this relation was weakened by the short range of interpregnancy intervals linked with poor pregnancy outcomes among the white women and by the small number of white women with intervals in this range. The increased risk with shorter intervals between pregnancies was evident primarily among women whose preceding pregnancies had resulted in the delivery of low-birth-weight or preterm infants. The mechanism of these interracial differences remains obscure, but it may involve a greater prevalence among black women of environmental or familial risk factors for unfavorable pregnancy outcomes, as has been proposed in several recent articles.34,35,36

We conclude that a short interpregnancy interval is an important risk factor for low birth weight and preterm delivery. Our results suggest that short interpregnancy intervals occur frequently, especially among black women. Among the black women in our study population, intervals of less than nine months between consecutive pregnancies were strongly associated with a higher prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight; this association largely accounts for the greater frequency of these outcomes among black infants. The infants born to black women with interpregnancy intervals of nine months or more had a low prevalence of preterm delivery and low birth weight; the rates in this group were similar to those among whites. Conversely, white women with interpregnancy intervals of less than three months had a high prevalence of adverse outcomes, similar to the rate among black women.

These findings have important implications for health policy in the United States, which currently has a far higher than expected prevalence of low birth weight and preterm delivery as well as large disparities in these rates between the races. Initiatives directed toward reducing the frequency of short interpregnancy intervals could have beneficial effects, especially among black Americans. This prospect is exciting because, unlike many currently recognized risk factors for unfavorable pregnancy outcome, interpregnancy intervals are potentially within the control of individual women.

The relation between the interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcome among white and black women should be studied further in larger populations. In the interim, public health strategies to reduce the currently high prevalence of low birth weight, preterm delivery, and infant mortality should include counseling that strongly encourages intervals of nine months or more between pregnancies.


Source Information

The opinions and assertions contained herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

From the Departments of Pediatrics (J.S.R., V.B.R.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (J.A.R.), Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, where reprint requests should be addressed to Col. James Rawlings.

References

  1. Wegman ME. Annual summary of vital statistics -- 1991. Pediatrics 1992;90:835-845. [Free Full Text]
  2. McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med 1985;312:82-90. [Abstract]
  3. Spurlock CW, Hinds MW, Skaggs JW, Hernandez CE. Infant death rates among the poor and nonpoor in Kentucky, 1982 to 1983. Pediatrics 1987;80:262-269. [Free Full Text]
  4. Wise PH, Kotelchuck M, Wilson ML, Mills M. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in childhood mortality in Boston. N Engl J Med 1985;313:360-366. [Abstract]
  5. Lieberman E, Ryan KJ, Monson RR, Schoenbaum SC. Risk factors accounting for racial differences in the rate of premature birth. N Engl J Med 1987;317:743-748. [Abstract]
  6. Kleinman JC, Kessel SS. Racial differences in low birth weight: trends and risk factors. N Engl J Med 1987;317:749-753. [Abstract]
  7. Rawlings JS, Weir MR. Race- and rank-specific infant mortality in a US military population. Am J Dis Child 1992;146:313-316. [Free Full Text]
  8. Eastman NJ. The effect of the interval between births on maternal and fetal outlook. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1944;47:445-463. 
  9. Spiers PS, Wang L. Short pregnancy interval, low birthweight, and the sudden infant death syndrome. Am J Epidemiol 1976;104:15-21. [Free Full Text]
  10. Fortney JA, Higgins JE. The effect of birth interval on perinatal survival and birth weight. Public Health 1984;98:73-83. [CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Brody DJ, Bracken MB. Short interpregnancy interval: a risk factor for low birthweight. Am J Perinatol 1987;4:50-54. [Medline]
  12. Ferraz EM, Gray RH, Fleming PL, Maia TM. Interpregnancy interval and low birth weight: findings from a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 1988;128:1111-1116. [Free Full Text]
  13. Lieberman E, Lang JM, Ryan KJ, Monson RR, Schoenbaum SC. The association of inter-pregnancy interval with small for gestational age births. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:1-5. [Medline]
  14. Miller JE. Determinants of intrauterine growth retardation: evidence against maternal depletion. J Biosoc Sci 1989;21:235-243. [Medline]
  15. Miller JE. Birth intervals and perinatal health: an investigation of three hypotheses. Fam Plann Perspect 1991;23:62-70. [CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Huttly SRA, Victora CG, Barros FC, Vaughan JP. Birth spacing and child health in urban Brazilian children. Pediatrics 1992;89:1049-1054. [Free Full Text]
  17. Eisner V, Brazie JV, Pratt MW, Hexter AC. The risk of low birthweight. Am J Public Health 1979;69:887-893. [Free Full Text]
  18. Mavalankar DV, Gray RH. Re: "Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm labor." Am J Epidemiol 1991;133:958-959. [Free Full Text]
  19. Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr 1991;119:417-423. [CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Armitage P. Statistical methods in medical research. New York: John Wiley, 1973.
  21. Bailar JC III, Mosteller F. Medical uses of statistics. Waltham, Mass.: NEJM Books, 1986.
  22. Fedrick J, Adelstein P. Influence of pregnancy spacing on outcome of pregnancy. BMJ 1973;4:753-756.
  23. Erickson JD, Bjerkedal T. Interpregnancy interval: association with birth weight, stillbirth, and neonatal death. J Epidemiol Community Health 1978;32:124-130. [Free Full Text]
  24. Hebert CC, Bouyer J, Collin D, Menger I. Spontaneous abortion and interpregnancy interval. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986;22:125-132. [CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Winkvist A, Rasmussen KM, Habicht J-P. A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome. Am J Public Health 1992;82:691-694. [Free Full Text]
  26. Caan B, Horgen DM, Margen S, King JC, Jewell NP. Benefits associated with WIC supplemental feeding during the interpregnancy interval. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;45:29-41. [Free Full Text]
  27. Winikoff B. The effects of birth spacing on child and maternal health. Stud Fam Plann 1983;14:231-245. [CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Hathout H, Kasrawi R, Moussa MAA, Saleh AK. Influence of pregnancy outcome on subsequent pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1982;20:145-147. [CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Klebanoff MA. Short interpregnancy interval and the risk of low birthweight. Am J Public Health 1988;78:667-670. [Free Full Text]
  30. Bakketeig LS, Hoffman HJ, Harley EE. The tendency to repeat gestational age and birth weight in successive births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:1086-1103. [Medline]
  31. Zimmer BG. Consequences of the number and spacing of pregnancies on outcome, and of pregnancy outcome on spacing. Soc Biol 1979;26:161-178. [Medline]
  32. Lang JM, Lieberman E, Ryan KJ, Monson RR. Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm labor. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:304-309. [Free Full Text]
  33. Santelli JS, Jacobson MS. Birth weight outcomes for repeat teenage pregnancy. J Adolesc Health Care 1990;11:240-247. [CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Adams MM, Read JA, Rawlings JS, Harlass FB, Sarno AP, Rhodes PH. Preterm delivery among black and white enlisted women in the United States Army. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:65-71. [Medline]
  35. Foster HW Jr, Thomas DJ, Semenya KA, Thomas J. Low birthweight in African Americans: does intergenerational well-being improve outcome? J Natl Med Assoc 1993;85:516-520. [Medline]
  36. Schoendorf KC, Hogue CJR. Kleinman JC, Rowley D. Mortality among infants of black as compared with white college-educated parents. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1522-1526. [Abstract]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Low Birth Weight in Relation to the Interval between Pregnancies
Berkowitz G. S., Hatch M., Sheehan T. J., Gregorio D. I., Williams B., Rawlings J. S., Rawlings V. B., Read J. A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1995; 333:386-387, Aug 10, 1995. Correspondence

Prevention of Preterm Birth
McGregor J. A., French J. I., Sepkowitz S., Devitt N., Goldenberg R. L., Rouse D. J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1858-1860, Dec 17, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.