The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:298-303 February 2, 1995 Number 5
NextNext

Infection with a Babesia-Like Organism in Northern California
David H. Persing, M.D., Ph.D., Barbara L. Herwaldt, M.D., M.P.H., Carol Glaser, D.V.M., M.D., Robert S. Lane, Ph.D., John W. Thomford, Ph.D., Dane Mathiesen, B.A., Peter J. Krause, M.D., Douglas F. Phillip, M.D., and Patricia A. Conrad, D.V.M., Ph.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Human babesiosis is a tick-transmitted zoonosis associated with two protozoa of the family Piroplasmorida: Babesia microti (in the United States) and B. divergens (in Europe). Recently, infection with an unusual babesia-like piroplasm (designated WA1) was described in a patient from Washington State. We studied four patients in California who were identified as being infected with a similar protozoal parasite. All four patients had undergone splenectomy, two because of trauma and two for other medical reasons. Two of the patients had complicated courses, and one died.

Methods Piroplasm-specific nuclear small-subunit ribosomal DNA was recovered from the blood of the four patients by amplification with the polymerase chain reaction. The genetic sequences were compared with those of other known piroplasm species. Indirect immunofluorescent-antibody testing of serum from the four patients and from other potentially exposed persons was performed with WA1 and babesia antigens.

Results Genetic sequence analysis showed that the organisms from all four patients were nearly identical. Phylogenic analysis showed that this strain is more closely related to a known canine pathogen (B. gibsoni) and to theileria species than to some members of the genus babesia. Serum from three of the patients was reactive to WA1 but not to B. microti antigen. Serologic testing showed WA1-antibody seroprevalence rates of 16 percent (8 of 51 persons at risk) and 3.5 percent (4 of 115) in two geographically distinct areas of northern California.

Conclusions A newly identified babesia-like organism causes infections in humans in the western United States. The clinical spectrum associated with infection with this protozoan ranges from asymptomatic infection or influenza-like illness to fulminant, fatal disease.


The genus babesia comprises approximately 100 species of tick-transmitted protozoa (family Piroplasmorida) that infect a wide variety of wild and domestic animals.1,2 Babesial parasites, together with members of the genus theileria, are referred to as piroplasms because of their pear-shaped intraerythrocytic stages.2 Only two species, Babesia microti (in the United States) and B. divergens (in Europe), have been definitively identified as human pathogens. In 1991, a zoonotic babesia-like piroplasm (designated WA1) that is genetically and antigenically distinct from B. microti and B. divergens was identified in Washington State.3,4 Phylogenic analysis revealed that WA1 is closely related to the canine pathogen B. gibsoni and is secondarily related to theileria species.4 Theileria species cause severe febrile illness and pharmacologically reversible lymphoproliferation in African and Eurasian cattle.4,5,6,7

Little is known about the prevalence of zoonotic infections caused by WA1 or related piroplasms. Before 1991, only two cases of babesiosis acquired in the western United States had been reported, both of which occurred in California in patients who had undergone splenectomy; the identity of the piroplasm species was not determined in either case.8,9 From 1991 to 1993, four additional patients with piroplasmosis were identified in California, all of whom had an influenza-like illness.10,11,12,13 In this report, we describe the initial genetic characterization of the protozoal parasites observed in these patients. We also report the findings of preliminary seroprevalence studies conducted in two geographically distinct areas of northern California.

Case Reports

Four patients, all men, who became ill in California were studied (Patients 1, 2, 3, and 4). In addition, blood samples obtained from one patient from Minnesota with a confirmed infection with B. microti (Patient 5) were studied (Table 1).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Features of Four Men with Piroplasmosis.

 
All four California patients had undergone splenectomy, two because of trauma, one (Patient 1) for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, and one (Patient 4) because of Hodgkin's disease. None had recently received a blood transfusion. The patients presented initially with influenza-like symptoms characteristic of early infection with B. microti (Table 1),1 and all were given pharmacologic and supportive therapy appropriate for acute babesiosis. The clinical details of their cases were reported recently.10,11,12,13 Patient 1 was a 24-year-old soldier who had participated in extensive field-training exercises at Fort Ord (Monterey County) and Fort Hunter Liggett (approximately 64.6 km [40 miles] to the southeast), before he became symptomatic. Patient 2 was a 31-year-old Air Force flight engineer who participated in field-training exercises in San Bernardino County 11 days before he became ill. He had also taken two camping trips in the Sierra Nevada mountains (Fresno County) in the month before the onset of disease. Patient 3 was a 36-year-old man who had been temporarily living and working near Lytton Springs (Sonoma County). His symptoms began about 19 days after a tick bite and increased over the ensuing 10-day period before hospitalization. Despite treatment, he had a cardiopulmonary arrest and died one day after hospitalization. Patient 4 was a 41-year-old man from Kern County who was evaluated for a several-day history of influenza-like symptoms. Relevant exposure history included a four-day camping and hunting trip in the Sierra Nevada mountains (Mono County) that ended eight days before he became ill. The patient recovered after a complicated course that included disseminated intravascular coagulation, pulmonary edema, and renal insufficiency. Figure 1 shows a blood smear prepared the day Patient 4 was hospitalized.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Photomicrograph of a Peripheral-Blood Smear from Patient 4.

Intraerythrocytic tetrad ("Maltese cross") forms composed of four pear-shaped intraerythrocytic merozoites are shown and were present in most microscopical fields. Also present were single-ring forms of intraerythrocytic merozoites. (x700.)

 
Patient 5 was a 62-year-old truck driver from Minnesota who had a six-week history of weight loss, fever, and chills. Infection with B. microti was diagnosed on the basis of serologic and polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) analyses (Pruthi RK, Wiltsie JC, Persing DH: unpublished data).

Methods

Specimen Collection

Serum specimens were available from all patients for indirect immunofluorescent-antibody testing (Table 2). Analyses with the PCR were performed on whole-blood specimens collected in EDTA or citrate anticoagulant. Whole-blood specimens were obtained from patients 2, 3, and 4 before therapy (Patients 3 and 4) or during therapy (Patient 2) and were cryopreserved in 10 percent dimethylsulfoxide within three days of collection. The whole-blood specimen from Patient 1 was collected at the end of therapy and then stored at 4°C for approximately five months before analysis.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Indirect Immunofluorescent-Antibody (IFA) Testing of Serum from Patients with Piroplasmosis, 1991 through 1993.

 
Seroprevalence Studies

Serum specimens were obtained from potentially exposed persons in California for immunofluorescent-antibody testing with WA1, B. microti, and B. gibsoni antigens. Specimens were obtained in March 1992 from 51 healthy men (age range, 18 to 31 years) stationed at Fort Ord, most of whom were involved in outdoor field-training exercises at Fort Ord and Fort Hunter Liggett. Follow-up serum samples were requested 10 months later from men with elevated WA1-antibody titers (>1:160). Specimens were also obtained from 115 current or former residents of a private ranch near Ukiah (Mendocino County), an area in northern California in which Lyme disease is endemic, who had enrolled in 1988 in a prospective study of the incidence of Lyme disease.14 The specimens were stored at -20°C before serologic testing was performed.

Serologic Testing

Indirect immunofluorescent-antibody testing was performed as described previously.4,15 Positive and negative controls were included with each run. All clinical specimens from the patients were read blindly in separate tests by two investigators from one laboratory. In addition, all reactive specimens (titer >1:160) were tested for rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody, and antibody to Toxoplasma gondii and Borrelia burgdorferi.

For the seroprevalence study of the Ukiah group, a different laboratory tested all 115 specimens for antibody to WA1 by using indirect immunofluorescent-antibody slides sent from the first laboratory. The specimens were tested for antibody to B. microti with commercially prepared B. microti antigen. B. microti substrate slides (MRL Diagnostics, Cypress, Calif.) were prepared with B. microti–infected hamster erythrocytes, fixed in acetone, and stored at -20°C before use in the immunofluorescent-antibody procedure. A group of 20 specimens (including the 4 seroreactive specimens) was tested blindly in the first laboratory according to the procedure outlined above, with 100 percent concordance in results between the laboratories.

Genetic Analysis of Piroplasm-Specific Ribosomal DNA

The piroplasm-specific nuclear small-subunit ribosomal DNA (nss rDNA) was recovered from whole-blood specimens by broad-range PCR amplification and analyzed by direct sequencing of the amplification product according to a procedure described previously for B. microti and the WA1 piroplasm.4,16,17 DNA sequence analysis was performed with broad-range and piroplasm-specific sequencing primers in a DNA-cycle sequencing protocol (GIBCO-BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) performed on both strands. Sequence construction, alignment, and phylogenic analyses were performed as described previously.4 Two methods were used for phylogenic analysis: neighbor-joining bootstrap analysis was done with the IBM PC program NJBOOT, and parsimony analysis was done with the PAUP3.0q program on a Macintosh computer as described previously.4

Results

Molecular Characterization of the Piroplasm

Attempts to recover the piroplasm by hamster inoculation and by in vitro cultivation of blood specimens from Patients 2, 3, and 4 were unsuccessful (data not shown). We then sought to recover piroplasm-specific nss rDNA sequences by broad-range PCR. A potential complication of this approach to the detection of eukaryotic pathogens is the coamplification of host rDNA sequences.16 After amplification a piroplasm-specific nss rDNA product (591 base pairs[bp]) was observed for all four California patients (Patients 1, 2, 3, and 4) and a patient infected with WA1 (Figure 2A).3,4 In Patients 1 and 2 (Figure 2A, lanes 5 and 6) and in the uninfected control, a 651-bp human nss rDNA product was also observed. However, differences in size and sequence composition between the piroplasm PCR product and the human genomic product allowed us to recover and sequence a 1272-bp portion of the piroplasm-specific gene from the blood of Patient 1 and a 591-bp fragment from the blood of Patients 2, 3, and 4.



View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Amplification of nss rDNA Fragments from Whole Blood Collected from Five Patients with Piroplasmosis (Panel A) and Neighbor-Joining Analysis (Panel B).

In Panel A the amplification product from the human nss rRNA gene migrates at 651 bp, whereas the piroplasm-specific product migrates at 591 bp. Lane 7 shows nss rDNA fragments from whole blood from a healthy control without parasitemia. WA1 denotes a patient infected with WA1 piroplasm. In Panel B, neighbor-joining analysis4 was performed on 408 alignable nucleotides with 63 phylogenically informative positions. The percentage of neighbor-joining bootstrap replications greater than 50 percent is shown above each node (branching point); the higher the percentage, the greater the likelihood that the species joined at the right are related. Branch length is not drawn to scale. Analysis of the larger fragment (1272 bp) recovered from Patient 1 gave similar results for a subgroup of the organisms for which additional sequence data were available (data not shown). Although the specific branching order shown is only moderately supported by neighbor-joining bootstrap analysis at some nodes, the level of confidence in the branching order at other nodes is very high. In particular, the cosegregation of B. divergens and the domestic canine pathogen B. canis from other piroplasm species included in the analysis was supported in 94 percent of bootstrap replications. The piroplasm-specific DNA sequences recovered from Patients 1 and 3 are grouped together because they were completely homologous; the same was true for piroplasm-specific DNA sequences recovered from Patients 2 and 4.

 
Sequence analysis (not shown) revealed that the organisms in the blood of all four California patients were nearly identical (99.8 percent homology). The organisms from two patients (Patients 1 and 3) had identical sequences within a 591-bp region that is highly polymorphic among piroplasm species analyzed to date; this sequence differed by only one nucleotide from the homologous segment recovered from the other two California patients. Phylogenic analysis was performed on nss rDNA segments recovered from the blood of the four patients; included in the analysis were related sequences from the three known human pathogens (B. microti, B. divergens, and WA1) and six animal pathogens (Theileria parva, T. annulata, B. gibsoni, B. rodhaini, B. canis, and B. equi) for which sequences were recently determined by us or identified in the Genbank sequence data base.4,18 A distantly related apicomplexan, Tox. gondii, was used to root the genetic-distance tree (Figure 2B). On the basis of this analysis, the California piroplasms are most closely related to WA1 and to the canine pathogen B. gibsoni. The latter group falls into a phylogenic cluster that includes B. equi and theileria species, whereas the other known human pathogens, B. microti (from the United States) and B. divergens (from Europe), segregate into successively more remote clusters (Figure 2B). This confirms our earlier observations and those of others of substantial genetic diversity among the zoonotic piroplasms.4,18 Moreover, the data provide evidence of a phylogenic link between the zoonotic piroplasms found in the western United States and lymphotropic piroplasms of the genus theileria, even to the exclusion of some members of the genus babesia itself (especially B. divergens and B. canis).4

Serodiagnosis of Piroplasm Infection

Consistent with the phylogenic relatedness of WA1 to the piroplasms isolated from Patients 1, 2, 3, and 4, we found that WA1 antigen could be used in an immunofluorescent-antibody assay to assess the serologic responses of these patients. Titers of antibody to WA1 antigen were markedly elevated (1:5120) in three of the four patients within one month after they became ill and then declined appreciably in the following months to 1:640 and 1:320 in the two patients who were monitored (Patients 1 and 2, respectively) (Table 2). Because Patient 3 died soon after hospitalization, only serum samples from the acute phase of the illness could be tested, and they were nonreactive to WA1. Serum samples from the three patients seroreactive to WA1 were also reactive to B. gibsoni, albeit at fourfold lower titers (data not shown). Consistent with the phylogenic and antigenic dissimilarity of WA1 and B. microti,3,4 none of the serum samples from the California patients showed cross-reactivity to B. microti. Serum samples from Patient 5, the Minnesota man who was infected with B. microti (confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing; data not shown), had a titer of 1:2560 against B. microti but limited cross-reactivity (1:160) to WA1 antigen (Table 2).

Seroprevalence Studies

In a preliminary assessment of the prevalence of infection with WA1 or related organisms, we tested serum specimens from 51 soldiers at Fort Ord. Eight of 51 enlisted men (16 percent) had elevated titers (defined as a titer >1:160) (Table 3). Two of the eight men had WA1 titers of 1:320, the same titer measured in Patient 2 six months after the onset of illness. None of the eight had detectable antibody to B. microti, and none had traveled to an area in which B. microti was endemic. However, all of them had had extensive military-related travel within and outside the United States before being assigned to Fort Ord. Four of the eight subjects were retested 10 months after the initial specimen was collected, and three had persistently elevated titers (Table 3). None of these three recalled a recent tick bite.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Indirect Immunofluorescent-Antibody Testing for Reactivity to B. microti (GI/Bm strain), WA1, and Other Antigens in Healthy Persons from Fort Ord and Ukiah, California, and in Persons Infected with B. microti.

 
Another set of serum specimens was obtained from 115 current or former residents of a private ranch near Ukiah who participated in a 1988 study of the prevalence of Lyme disease14 (Table 3). Four (3.5 percent) had titers of antibody to WA1 antigen of at least 1:160. Follow-up serum samples were obtained in 1992 from two subjects who had elevated titers in 1988. The 1988 and 1992 specimens were tested in parallel, and both subjects had persistently elevated titers of antibody to WA1 antigen. Again, in all four subjects the seroreactivity was apparently specific for WA1; antibody to B. microti was not detectable in specimens from these four subjects or from any of the remaining subjects (Table 3). All of the WA1-seroreactive specimens were tested for rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody, and antibody to Tox. gondii, which might be associated with serologic false positivity or cross-reactivity.19,20,21 The results of these additional studies were largely uninformative (Table 3). Serum from one WA1-seroreactive Ukiah resident was positive for antibody to Bor. burgdorferi, which was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Table 3). As a further demonstration of immunofluorescent-antibody specificity, a panel of 36 serum samples from patients known to be infected with B. microti showed no cross-reactivity to WA1 (Table 3); some of these patients had titers of at least 1:1024 in response to the homologous antigen. As was observed in the index patients, all of the specimens that were seroreactive to WA1 had limited cross-reactivity to B. gibsoni (data not shown).

Discussion

Babesiosis is an emerging vector-borne disease that is endemic in some areas of the northeastern and upper midwestern United States but has been infrequently reported in the western United States. Recently, a novel zoonotic piroplasm (WA1) was isolated from an apparently immunocompetent, normosplenic 41-year-old man from south-central Washington.3 Unlike B. microti, the etiologic agent of human babesiosis in the northeastern and Great Lakes regions of the United States, the WA1 piroplasm grew continuously in stationary erythrocyte cultures and had several unique biologic and genetic characteristics.4 In this study, analysis of piroplasm-specific DNA recovered from four patients in California showed that the causative agents are related to WA1 and are distinct from the other known zoonotic piroplasms. The agents from the western United States are related to but distinct from the canine pathogen B. gibsoni21,22,23 and are secondarily related to theileria species, which cause lymphoproliferative disorders in African and Eurasian cattle.5,6,7 Taken together, the molecular and immunologic data suggest that WA1 and related organisms represent a newly recognized species or a group of related species that are distinct from the other piroplasms known to infect humans.

The antigenic cross-reactivity of WA1 with genetically related organisms allowed us to perform seroprevalence studies of zoonotic piroplasmosis among potentially exposed persons, similar to those done for B. microti.24,25,26 Various seroprevalence rates were observed: 3.5 percent among persons living in an area of northern California in which Lyme disease is endemic and 16 percent among soldiers stationed at Fort Ord. Three of the subjects tested had titers of 1:320, the same level recorded in Patient 2 six months after his illness. The cutoff titer we used to define a reactive result (1:160) was based on our previous experience with a similar test for B. microti4,15 and on serial testing of specimens from two patients (Patients 1 and 2) for whom follow-up serum samples were available. However, the serologic results must be interpreted with caution because of uncertainty about the specificity of the methods used.

Although the selective reactivity of serum samples from 12 subjects to WA1 (and its relative B. gibsoni) but not to B. microti argues against a purely nonspecific mechanism, the ultimate determination of the cutoff titer to be used as an indicator of past exposure must await additional prospective studies. Even if the immunofluorescent-antibody test is highly specific, we cannot determine when or where seroconversion occurred. Although none of the seroreactive subjects had traveled to an area in which B. microti was endemic, the subjects from Fort Ord had had extensive military-related travel within and outside the United States. The persistently elevated antibody titers in some of these subjects might be due to chronic subclinical or self-limited infection, reexposure to the pathogen, or other, nonspecific factors.24,25,26

Although an exoerythrocytic stage6,7,27 has not yet been found for the organisms described here, such a stage, as shown for B. equi and suggested for B. microti,27 might serve as a reservoir of persistent infection that is relatively protected from immune surveillance. A chronic carrier state has been described in animals infected with many species of babesia and theileria, the detection of which may be facilitated by the use of sensitive molecular diagnostic tests.16,17,28,29 Recently, persistence of piroplasm-specific DNA has been observed in blood samples from patients in the northeastern United States with previously unrecognized B. microti infection.30 The latter findings may constitute the first direct evidence in support of previous seroprevalence studies indicating that chronic subclinical infection also exists in humans.

An arthropod vector for the organism described here has not yet been identified. All piroplasms studied to date are tick-transmitted; Ixodes pacificus, which serves as the predominant vector of the Lyme disease spirochete (Bor. burgdorferi) in the western United States,31,32 can transmit B. microti to animals.33 However, the relatively low seroprevalence rate (3.5 percent) in the Ukiah residents, of whom nearly 25 percent were seropositive for Bor. burgdorferi,14 might be consistent with an independent mode of transmission. One of the four patients described here (Patient 3) recalled being bitten by a tick about 19 days before he became symptomatic; at the time of year that he was bitten, nymphal stages of both I. pacificus and Dermacentor occidentalis are common in the area (Lytton Springs, Sonoma County) (Clover J: personal communication). A fuller understanding of the risk of human piroplasmosis in the western United States and other areas will depend on the identification of the animal reservoirs of infection and further characterization of the transmission cycle of the etiologic agents.

Supported by grants (AI32403, AR41497, and AI30548) from the Public Health Service (to Dr. Persing) and by a grant (AI34427) from the National Institutes of Health (to Dr. Conrad).

We are indebted to the clinicians in California whose observations and continued interest facilitated further characterization of these cases: Drs. Kai Gelphman, M. Alsamman, S. Tasker, R. Wayne Larson, Michael Medvin, and James A. Newton, Jr.; to Dr. Jon Rosenberg of the California State Health Department for his assistance in compiling clinical information regarding the cases; to Mr. Doug Hauschild for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript; to Ms. Jenifer Magera and Ms. Mary Mesirow for technical assistance; to Dr. Barbara Bowman for assistance with the phylogenic analysis; and to Drs. Henry Homburger, Jerry Katzmann, and Glenn Roberts for additional serologic testing.


Source Information

From the Division of Experimental Pathology and the Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn. (D.H.P., D.M.); the Division of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (B.L.H.); the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco (C.G.); the Entomology Group, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley (R.S.L.); the Department of Veterinary Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis (J.W.T., P.A.C.); the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Connecticut, Farmington (P.J.K.); and Preventive Medicine Services, California Medical Detachment, Fort Ord, Calif. (D.F.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Persing at the Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905.

References

  1. Telford SR III, Gorenflot A, Brasseur P, Spielman A. Babesial infections in humans and wildlife. In: Kreier JP, ed. Parasitic protozoa. 2nd ed. Vol. 5. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press, 1993:1-47. 
  2. Levine ND. Taxonomy of the piroplasms. Trans Am Microsc Soc 1971;90:2-33. [CrossRef]
  3. Quick RE, Herwaldt BL, Thomford JW, et al. Babesiosis in Washington State: a new species of Babesia? Ann Intern Med 1993;119:284-290. [Free Full Text]
  4. Thomford JW, Conrad PA, Telford SR III, et al. Cultivation and phylogenetic characterization of a newly recognized human pathogenic protozoan. J Infect Dis 1994;169:1050-1056. [Medline]
  5. Theiler A. Rhodesian tick fever. Transvaal Agr J 1904;2:421-38.
  6. Baldwin CL, Black SJ, Brown WC, et al. Bovine T cells, B cells, and null cells are transformed by the protozoan parasite Theileria parva. Infect Immun 1988;56:462-467. [Free Full Text]
  7. ole-MoiYoi OK. Theileria parva: an intracellular protozoan parasite that induces reversible lymphocyte transformation. Exp Parasitol 1989;69:204-210. [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Scholtens RG, Braff EH, Healey GA, Gleason N. A case of babesiosis in man in the United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1968;17:810-813.
  9. Bredt AB, Weinstein WM, Cohen S. Treatment of babesiosis in asplenic patients. JAMA 1981;245:1938-1939. [Free Full Text]
  10. Babesiosis in California. Calif Morb 1992;3(4):1.
  11. Babesiosis in California, Part I. Calif Morb 1994;7(8):1.
  12. Babesiosis in California, Part II. Calif Morb 1994;9(10):1.
  13. Jerant AF, Arline AD. Babesiosis in California. West J Med 1993;158:622-625. [Medline]
  14. Lane RS, Manweiler SA, Stubbs HA, Lennette ET, Madigan JE, Lavoie PE. Risk factors for Lyme disease in a small rural community in northern California. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:1358-1368. [Free Full Text]
  15. Krause PJ, Telford SR III, Ryan R, et al. Diagnosis of babesiosis: evaluation of a serologic test for the detection of Babesia microti antibody. J Infect Dis 1994;169:923-926. [Medline]
  16. Persing DH, Mathiesen D, Marshall WF, et al. Detection of Babesia microti by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2097-2103. [Free Full Text]
  17. Persing DH. PCR detection of Babesia microti. In: Persing DH, Smith TF, Tenover FC, White TJ, eds. Diagnostic molecular microbiology: principles and applications. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 1993:475-9.
  18. Allsopp MT, Cavalier-Smith T, De Waal DT, Allsopp BA. Phylogeny and evolution of the piroplasms. Parasitology 1994;108:147-152.
  19. Fuccillo DA, Vacante DA, Sever JL. Rapid viral diagnosis. In: Rose NR, Conway de Macario E, Fahey JL, Friedman H, Penn GM, eds. Manual of clinical laboratory immunology. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 1992:545-53.
  20. Mertz LE, Wobig GH, Duffy J, Katzmann JA. A comparison of test procedures for the detection of antibody to Borrelia burgdorferi. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988;539:474-475. [CrossRef]
  21. Yamane I, Thomford JW, Gardner IA, Dubey JP, Levy M, Conrad PA. Evaluation of the indirect fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of Babesia gibsoni infections in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:1579-1584. [Medline]
  22. Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA, Donner CS, Spielman A, Piesman J. Canine Babesia new to North America. Science 1979;204:1431-1432. [Free Full Text]
  23. Conrad P, Thomford J, Yamane I, et al. Hemolytic anemia caused by Babesia gibsoni infection in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;199:601-605. [Medline]
  24. Popovsky MA, Lindberg LE, Syrek AL, Page PL. Prevalence of Babesia antibody in a selected blood donor population. Transfusion 1988;28:59-61. [CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ruebush TK II, Juranek DD, Chisholm ES, Snow PC, Healy GR, Sulzer AJ. Human babesiosis in Nantucket Island: evidence for self-limited and subclinical infections. N Engl J Med 1977;297:825-827. [Medline]
  26. Krause PJ, Telford SR III, Ryan R, et al. Geographical and temporal distribution of babesial infection in Connecticut. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:1-4. [Free Full Text]
  27. Mehlhorn H, Schein E. The piroplasms: life cycle and sexual stages. Adv Parasitol 1984;23:37-103. [Medline]
  28. Figueroa JV, Chieves LP, Johnson GS, Buening GM. Detection of Babesia bigemina-infected carriers by polymerase chain reaction amplification. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2576-2582. [Free Full Text]
  29. Bishop R, Sohanpal B, Kariuki DP, et al. Detection of a carrier state in Theileria parva-infected cattle by the polymerase chain reaction. Parasitology 1992;104:215-232.
  30. Krause P, Sikand VJ, Telford SR III, et al. Molecular monitoring of Babesia microti parasitemia: evidence of chronic infection in humans. In: Program and abstracts of the 34th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobic Agents and Chemotherapy, Orlando, Fla., October 4–7, 1994. Washington, D.C.: American Society of Microbiology, 1994:2001. abstract.
  31. Burgdorfer W, Lane RS, Barbour AG, Gresbrink RA, Anderson JR. The western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus: a vector of Borrelia burgdorferi. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1985;34:925-930.
  32. Lane RS, Burgdorfer W. Potential role of native and exotic deer and their associated ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in the ecology of Lyme disease in California, USA. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 1986;263:55-64.
  33. Oliveira MR, Kreier JP. Transmission of Babesia microti using various species of ticks as vectors. J Parasitol 1979;65:816-817. [CrossRef][Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.