The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 333:1093-1098 October 26, 1995 Number 17
NextNext

Mutations of the Growth Hormone Receptor in Children with Idiopathic Short Stature
Audrey D. Goddard, Ph.D., Robin Covello, M.Sc., Shiuh-Ming Luoh, M.Sc., Tim Clackson, Ph.D., Kenneth M. Attie, M.D., Neil Gesundheit, M.D., Amy Chen Rundle, M.Sc., James A. Wells, Ph.D., Lena M.S. Carlsson, M.D., Ph.D., for The Growth Hormone Insensitivity Study Group

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Short stature in children who are not deficient in growth hormone (GH) is probably caused by a variety of defects. Some children with idiopathic short stature have low serum concentrations of GH-binding protein, which is derived from the GH receptor. The possibility that low serum concentrations of GH-binding protein might indicate partial insensitivity to GH led us to investigate possible defects in the gene for the GH receptor in children with idiopathic short stature and low serum concentrations of GH-binding protein.

Methods We studied 14 children with idiopathic short stature who were selected on the basis of normal GH secretion and low serum concentrations of GH-binding protein. Analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms and DNA sequencing were both used to identify mutations in the GH-receptor gene.

Results Mutations in the region of the GH-receptor gene that codes for the extracellular domain of the receptor were found in 4 of the 14 children, but in none of 24 normal subjects. One of the four children with mutations was a compound heterozygote, with one mutation that reduced the affinity of the receptor for GH and a second mutation that may affect a function other than ligand binding. The remaining three children had single mutations in one allele of the gene. One mutation introduced a premature termination codon, and two caused substitutions of single amino acids in a structurally conserved domain of the receptor.

Conclusions Some children with idiopathic short stature may have partial insensitivity to GH due to mutations in the GH-receptor gene.


The cause of growth failure in the majority of short children who do not have a deficiency of growth hormone (GH) is unknown. These otherwise normal children with idiopathic short stature secrete normal amounts of GH in response to pharmacologic stimulation.1 GH stimulates growth by binding to GH receptors, thereby stimulating the production of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Serum contains a GH-binding protein that is identical to the extracellular domain of the GH receptor. The importance of the GH receptor in modulating the growth-promoting action of GH is demonstrated by the abnormal growth of children with complete insensitivity to GH due to inactivating mutations in the gene for the GH receptor (Laron dwarfism).2

Children with idiopathic short stature may secrete GH normally and yet have a defect in the ability of target cells to respond to GH. Such a defect could occur in either the GH receptor or the intracellular mediators of GH signaling. Serum concentrations of GH-binding protein3 are low in many children with idiopathic short stature,4,5 suggesting that such children may have abnormalities in the gene for the GH receptor. This possibility is supported by the observation that children with lower serum concentrations of GH-binding protein have lower serum IGF-I concentrations and higher mean 12-hour serum GH concentrations (suggesting a defect in the functioning of IGF-I as a negative regulator of GH secretion) than children with idiopathic short stature who have normal serum concentrations of this protein.6 Although most children with idiopathic short stature respond to treatment with recombinant GH with increases in their growth rates,7 their responses are more limited than those of children with GH deficiency who are treated similarly. This mild form of insensitivity to GH could be caused by less disruptive mutations in the gene for the GH receptor than are found in children with complete GH insensitivity (those with Laron dwarfism).2

We have proposed4,6 that the reduced serum concentrations of GH-binding protein in children with idiopathic short stature may serve as a marker for partial insensitivity to GH and may indicate mutations in the GH-receptor gene. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the coding region of that gene for mutations in a subgroup of 14 children with idiopathic short stature and low serum concentrations of GH-binding protein. We detected mutations in four of the children that would be expected to alter the structure of the extracellular domain.

Methods

Study Subjects

We studied 14 children with idiopathic short stature, all but one of whom were selected from the Genentech National Cooperative Growth Study (Patient 1 was identified separately). To be included in that study, children had to be evaluated to determine the hormonal basis of their short stature and had to be willing to be followed thereafter. In the present study, standard-deviation (SD) scores for height and serum concentrations of GH-binding protein and IGF-I were calculated by subtracting the mean reference values for those variables in normal subjects from the values in the study subjects and dividing the difference by the standard deviation in the normal subjects. Children of both sexes were selected who had SD scores for height below -2.5 (except Patient 11),8 SD scores for the serum concentration of GH-binding protein (as measured by a ligand-mediated immunofunctional assay3 or, in the case of Patient 1, by charcoal separation9) below -2, SD scores for the serum IGF-I concentration (as determined by the Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, Calif.) below 0, maximal stimulated serum GH concentrations (as measured by various assays after stimulation by clonidine, insulin, glucagon, levodopa, or arginine) above 10 µg per liter, and no systemic illness.

The relatives of two patients (Patients 2 and 4) were studied to confirm the heritability of the mutations. Twenty-four normal adults served as controls. The statistical significance of differences between populations was calculated by Fisher's exact test.

Sample Preparation and Amplification

Lymphocytes were isolated from peripheral blood with either cell-separation tubes (LeucoPrep, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lake, N.J.) or lymphocyte-separation medium (LSM, Organon Teknika, Durham, N.C.) and were transformed by Epstein–Barr virus (EBV).10 DNA was isolated both from EBV-transformed lymphocytes and directly from fresh lymphocytes (to control for EBV-induced mutations; QIAamp Blood Kit, Qiagen, Chatsworth, Calif.). Genomic fragments of the GH-receptor gene specific for exons 2 through 9 and their flanking splice sites were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with intronic primers. The coding portion of exon 10 was amplified in three overlapping fragments. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 2 percent agarose gels to test for contamination and verify fragment size.

Total RNA (5 to 10 µg) was prepared from the EBV-transformed lymphocytes by the acid–phenol method11 and was reverse-transcribed (RT kit, Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, Calif.) with random primers (Promega, Madison, Wis.). Complementary DNA (cDNA) from the GH receptor was amplified in a nested PCR (cycle conditions and primer sequences for both genomic PCR and reverse-transcriptase PCR are available on request).

Analysis of Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphisms

In the analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms of the products from each PCR reaction, 2 to 4 µl of the reaction mixture was mixed with an equal volume of loading buffer, denatured at 100°C for two minutes, and placed on ice. The samples were electrophoresed at room temperature in 0.5x MDE gels (AT Biochem, Malvern, Pa.) with either 1 or 10 percent glycerol, according to the instructions of the manufacturer, after which the gels were dried and processed for autoradiography.

DNA Sequencing

Mutations detected as aberrant bands by analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms were confirmed by sequencing the PCR products by the dye-terminator method and by sequencing 12 subclones by the dye-primer method with an ABI373 sequencer or an Ampli-Cycle kit (Applied Biosystems Division, Perkin-Elmer) and 33P-labeled {alpha}-deoxyadenosine triphosphate (Dupont–New England Nuclear, Wilmington, Del.). Errors caused by Taq polymerase were avoided by sequencing the PCR products from different reactions and by sequencing 12 or more subclones of each PCR fragment.

Assay of GH Binding

Recombinant extracellular domains of the receptor that contained the mutations were engineered by oligonucleotide-mediated site-directed mutagenesis, expression in Escherichia coli, and purification as described elsewhere.12,13,14 Affinity for GH was determined by competitive displacement of GH from the mutant receptors with radioiodinated GH.15 Dissociation constants were calculated by Scatchard analysis. A monoclonal antibody (Mab5) against the GH receptor was used to precipitate the GH-receptor–GH complex. This antibody prevents homodimerization of the receptor, allowing the dissociation constant for the initial 1:1 interaction to be determined independently of the effects of dimerization.12,16

Results

The clinical characteristics of the 14 children with idiopathic short stature are shown in Table 1. PCR fragments of individual exons of the GH-receptor gene that migrated with altered mobility were detected in 4 of these children (Patients 1, 2, 4, and 7) (Figure 1A, Figure 1B, Figure 1C, Figure 1D, and Figure 1E), but in the 24 normal subjects only known polymorphisms in the DNA were found (in exon 6, guanosine or adenosine at base pair 558; and in exon 10, cytosine or adenosine at base pair 1630)17,18 (data not shown). Thus, there was a higher frequency of mutations of the GH-receptor gene in the children with idiopathic short stature who had low concentrations of GH-binding protein than in the normal subjects (P = 0.014). Each of the genomic PCR fragments thought to carry a mutation was sequenced in order to characterize the alteration that caused the aberrant band (data not shown). The GH-receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) of Patients 1 through 9 was also analyzed by reverse-transcriptase PCR; all the fragments were of the predicted sizes, and thus splicing alterations were ruled out (data not shown).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of the 14 children with Idiopathic Short Stature.

 





View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Analysis of Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphisms in PCR Fragments of Genomic DNA from Four Children with Idiopathic Short Stature Who Had Mutations in Their GH-Receptor Genes.

A normal subject (N) is also included in each panel. Panel A shows exon 7 in Patients 1, 2, 3, and 4; the extra band in the product from Patient 1 (arrow) indicates the presence of a mutation. Panel B shows exon 5 in Patients 2, 3, and 4, with aberrant bands (arrows) in the sample from Patient 2. Panel C shows exon 4, and Panel D exon 6, in Patients 2, 3, and 4; aberrant bands (arrows) are seen in the two samples from Patient 4. Panel E shows exon 7 in Patients 5, 6, and 7, with an aberrant band (arrow) in the sample from Patient 7. All the samples were electrophoresed in a 0.5x MDE gel, with either 10 percent (Panels A, B, and C) or 1 percent (Panels D and E) glycerol.

 
In the DNA from Patient 1, one of the genomic PCR fragments of exon 7 was aberrant (Figure 1A) on analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms. DNA sequencing showed that a mutation at base pair 686 caused an arginine to be replaced with a histidine at amino acid 211 in the mature protein (Arg211His). No other abnormalities affecting the extracellular domain of the GH receptor were detected by sequencing PCR products from the exons encoding the extracellular domain. The likelihood that this patient carried a second mutation was therefore low. Patient 1 was found to be responsive to GH on the basis of an increase in the serum IGF-I concentration that occurred after the administration of GH (serum IGF-I, 56 µg per liter at base line and 179 µg per liter after four days of treatment with 0.1 mg of GH per kilogram of body weight per day) and an increase in the growth rate from less than 2 to 6.5 cm per year with GH therapy (0.05 mg per kilogram per day) (Table 1).

DNA from Patient 2 showed an aberrant band in one genomic PCR product from exon 5 on analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms (Figure 1B). DNA sequencing identified a mutation at position 418 in the cDNA that introduced a stop codon in place of cysteine at amino acid 122 (Cys122Stop). This mutant allele was most likely a null mutation, with no functional protein being produced. No other mutation was detected in this patient. Analysis of DNA from both the mother and the father of Patient 2 indicated that he had inherited the mutation from his mother (Figure 2A). During the first year of treatment with 0.3 mg of GH per kilogram per week, his growth rate increased from 4.1 to 5.7 cm per year (Table 1), indicating a moderate response to exogenous GH. He had a puberty-associated growth spurt of 10.3 cm per year during the second year of treatment.

Patient 4 had abnormal bands on analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms in exons 4 and 6 (Figure 1C and Figure 1D) and reverse-transcriptase PCR fragments covering these regions. This child was a compound heterozygote, with both a mutation in exon 4 that introduced a lysine in place of a glutamic acid at position 44 (Glu44Lys) and a mutation in exon 6 that introduced a cysteine in place of an arginine at position 161 (Arg161Cys) (Table 2). The two mutations were found in different subclones spanning exons 4 through 6 (data not shown); thus, one mutation was found in each allele. Genetic analysis of the patient's family members (Figure 2B) indicated that the mutation in exon 4 was inherited from the paternal side of the family and the mutation in exon 6 from the maternal side. Patient 4 did not have severe growth failure, but his growth rate increased slightly — from 5.0 cm per year before treatment to 6.0 cm per year — during six months of treatment with GH (0.35 mg per kilogram per week).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mutations in the Gene for the GH receptor in Four Children with Idiopathic Short Stature.

 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Pedigrees of Two Families in Which Mutations of the Gene for the GH Receptor Were Detected in One Child.

The pedigree for Family 2 (Panel A) is shown above the analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms in the genomic PCR products from exon 5 (box). Gray symbols denote alleles for the mutation in exon 5, open symbols wild-type alleles, solid symbols alleles of unknown identity in family members who could not be tested, square symbols male family members, and circles female family members. The SD scores for height of all three generations are shown adjacent to the corresponding symbols. The arrow indicates the mutant base. The pedigree for Family 4 (Panel B) is shown above the analyses of exons 4 and 6 in that family. Light gray symbols denote the mutation in exon 4, and dark gray symbols the mutation in exon 6; the other symbols are as in Panel A.

 
Like Patients 1 and 2, Patient 7 had an alteration in a single allele (Figure 1E). A mutation at base pair 726 introduced an aspartic acid in place of a glutamic acid at position 224 (Glu224Asp). Neither analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms nor direct sequencing of the region of the gene that coded for the extracellular domain identified a second mutation in this patient. Patient 7 was not treated with GH.

We then investigated the effects of these mutations on the ability of the receptor to bind GH. Residue Glu44 is in direct contact with the GH molecule19 (Figure 3), and it is known that the replacement of Glu44 with alanine reduces GH binding.12 The introduction of a lysine at position 44 reduced binding by a factor of 330 as compared with the binding of the wild-type receptor (Table 2). By contrast, residue Arg161 is not directly involved in the interaction between GH and its receptor19; its mutation to cysteine reduced binding by a factor of 2.1 (Table 2). Residue Arg211 is on the surface of the receptor away from the region that binds GH.19 The mutant Arg211His protein had an affinity for GH similar to that of the wild-type receptor (Table 2). However, the level of expression of the mutant receptor was much lower (by a factor of 10,000) than that of the wild-type receptor. We were unable to express the Arg211Gly mutation found in some children with Laron dwarfism20 in our system (data not shown). The conservative Glu224Asp substitution was expressed at normal levels and resembled the Arg211His mutant protein in that its affinity for GH was nearly normal (Table 2).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Structure of the GH-Receptor–GH Complex.

The structure of human GH (blue) and serum GH-binding protein (gray) was derived from crystallographic coordinates19 (and de Vos AM, Ultsch M: personal communication); the position of mutations associated with idiopathic short stature is shown in red. The GH-receptor residue Glu44 interacts with the Arg64 (dark blue) on the GH molecule (light blue).

 
Discussion

Our finding of mutations in the gene for the GH receptor provides support for the suggestion that some children with idiopathic short stature and low serum concentrations of GH-binding protein have partial insensitivity to GH.6 Single-strand conformation analysis can detect approximately 80 percent of known mutations in experimental systems21,22; therefore, the children we studied may have additional mutations that were missed. In addition, there could be defects in the noncoding regions of the gene for the GH receptor or in other genes encoding products that influence growth.

Three of the four children who had mutations in the GH-receptor gene (Patients 1, 2, and 4) were treated with GH, and had marginal growth in response to therapy (Table 1), suggesting that they may be partially insensitive to GH because of dysfunctional GH receptors. Patient 1 appeared to have a dose-dependent growth response to GH (Table 1). The poor response of Patient 4 probably reflects the effect of a mutation in each allele of the gene for the receptor, including one that reduces the affinity of the receptor for GH by a factor of 330. It is likely that there is a continuum of GH responsiveness ranging from complete insensitivity to GH, as occurs in children with Laron dwarfism, to idiopathic short stature in children with partial GH insensitivity (such as the children described here), to the normal phenotype.

In Families 2 and 4, the known carriers of mutations of the GH-receptor gene had heights below the mean. Patient 4 was a compound heterozygote for the Glu44Lys and Arg161Cys substitutions and was more severely affected than his heterozygous parents (Figure 2B). Patient 2 (with a Cys122Stop mutation in one allele) was more severely affected than his mother, who carried the same genotype (Figure 2A), suggesting that he had inherited an as yet undefined mutation from his father that affected the expression of the structurally normal GH-receptor allele or another step in growth regulation. The former possibility is suggested by the lack of detectable GH-binding protein in this patient's serum (Table 1).

The implication that heterozygous mutations in the GH-receptor gene can have mild phenotypic consequences has been suggested by studies of children with Laron dwarfism and their families. Heterozygotes for mutations in the GH-receptor gene (i.e., parents and siblings of children with Laron dwarfism) may have mild abnormalities of growth23,24 and low serum concentrations of GH-binding protein.25,26 Partial GH insensitivity that results in short stature may arise in carriers of heterozygous mutations of the GH-receptor gene under the influence of mutations in other genes or when the alterations confer a dominant phenotype.

The five mutations identified in our four patients were confined to the extracellular domains of the receptors. The Glu44Lys substitution caused the affinity of the receptor for GH to decrease by a factor of 330, whereas each of the other mutations had a much smaller effect on ligand binding (Table 2). The Arg161Cys mutation probably has a major effect on receptor function, because homozygosity for this alteration is associated with complete insensitivity to GH. The poor expression in E. coli of the proteins coded by the Arg211His mutant gene and the Arg211Gly mutant gene20 suggests that these proteins are not folded in a stable fashion. This observation also correlates with our failure to detect serum GH-binding protein in Patient 1 (Table 1), implying that the Arg211His mutation may function as a dominant negative phenotype or that the second allele in this patient is poorly expressed. Mutations of Glu224 do not alter GH binding or protein concentrations (Table 2), but they may not be localized in the cells in a normal fashion and therefore may not be accessible to ligand (GH).27

We conclude that a subgroup of children with idiopathic short stature and clinical findings suggestive of partial insensitivity to GH have mutations in the gene for the GH receptor that may reduce the function of the receptor. Because the patients studied were selected partly on the basis of reduced serum concentrations of GH-binding protein, the identified mutations may affect ligand binding directly (as with Glu44Lys) or may potentially reduce the availability of cell-surface receptors (as with Arg161Cys, Arg211His, and Glu224Asp). Three of the children with mutated GH-receptor genes who were treated with exogenous GH had marginal growth in response to treatment, again suggesting partial insensitivity to GH. Other children with idiopathic short stature and similar clinical characteristics may have mutations of this gene that result in partial GH insensitivity.

Supported by Genentech, Inc. Dr. Carlsson is a consultant for Genentech.

We are indebted to Dr. Aida Metzenberg for the EBV-producing cell line B95-8, to Mr. Peter Compton for statistical consultation, to Dr. A.M. de Vos for providing unpublished crystallographic coordinates, to Mr. Hal Mulvihill for collecting samples, to Dr. William Wood for technical advice, to the Genentech oligonucleotide-synthesis group, to Dr. Harvey Guyda for the determination of serum GH-binding protein in Patient 1, and to all who have contributed data to the National Cooperative Growth Study.

* Additional members of the Growth Hormone Insensitivity Study Group are listed in the Appendix.


Source Information

From the Departments of Molecular Biology (A.D.G., S.-M.L.), Endocrine Research (R.C.), Protein Engineering (T.C., J.A.W.), and Medical Affairs (K.M.A., N.G., A.C.R.), Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, Calif.; and the Research Center for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden (L.M.S.C.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Goddard at the Department of Molecular Biology, Genentech, Inc., 460 Point San Bruno Blvd., South San Francisco, CA 94080.

References

  1. Lippe BM, Nakamoto JM. Conventional and nonconventional uses of growth hormone. Recent Prog Horm Res 1993;48:179-235. 
  2. Rosenfeld RG, Rosenbloom AL, Guevara-Aguirre J. Growth hormone (GH) insensitivity due to primary GH receptor deficiency. Endocr Rev 1994;15:369-390. [Abstract]
  3. Carlsson LMS, Rowland AM, Clark RG, Gesundheit N, Wong WLT. Ligand-mediated immunofunctional assay for quantitation of growth hormone-binding protein in human blood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;73:1216-1223. [Abstract]
  4. Carlsson LMS, Attie KM, Compton PG, Vitangcol RV, Merimee TJ. Reduced concentration of serum growth hormone-binding protein in children with idiopathic short stature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;78:1325-1330. [Abstract]
  5. Mauras N, Carlsson LMS, Murphy S, Merimee TJ. Growth hormone-binding protein levels: studies of children with short stature. Metabolism 1994;43:357-359. [Medline]
  6. Attie KM, Carlsson LMS, Rundle AC, Sherman BM. Evidence for partial growth hormone insensitivity among patients with idiopathic short stature. J Pediatr 1995;127:244-250. [CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Hopwood NJ, Hintz RL, Gertner JM, et al. Growth response of children with non-growth-hormone deficiency and marked short stature during three years of growth hormone therapy. J Pediatr 1993;123:215-222. [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Hamill PVV, Drizd TA, Johnson CL, Reed RB, Roche AF, Moore WM. Physical growth: National Center for Health statistics percentiles. Am J Clin Nutr 1979;32:607-629. [Free Full Text]
  9. Amit T, Barkey RJ, Youdim MB, Hochberg Z. A new and convenient assay of growth hormone-binding protein activity in human serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;71:474-480. [Abstract]
  10. Katz BZ, Raab-Traub N, Miller G. Latent and replicating forms of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in lymphomas and lymphoproliferative diseases. J Infect Dis 1989;160:589-598. [Medline]
  11. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 1987;162:156-159. [Medline]
  12. Clackson T, Wells JA. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 1995;267:383-386. [Free Full Text]
  13. Fuh G, Mulkerrin MG, Bass S, et al. The human growth hormone receptor: secretion from Escherichia coli and disulfide bonding pattern of the extracellular binding domain. J Biol Chem 1990;265:3111-3115. [Free Full Text]
  14. Bass SH, Mulkerrin MG, Wells JA. A systematic mutational analysis of hormone-binding determinants in the human growth hormone receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:4498-4502. [Free Full Text]
  15. Spencer SA, Hammonds RG, Henzel WJ, Rodriguez H, Waters MJ, Wood WI. Rabbit liver growth hormone receptor and serum binding protein: purification, characterization, and sequence. J Biol Chem 1988;263:7862-7867. [Free Full Text]
  16. Cunningham BC, Ultsch M, de Vos AM, Mulkerrin MG, Clauser KR, Wells JA. Dimerization of the extracellular domain of the human growth hormone receptor by a single hormone molecule. Science 1991;254:821-825. [Free Full Text]
  17. Leung DW, Spencer SA, Cachianes G, et al. Growth hormone receptor and serum binding protein: purification, cloning and expression. Nature 1987;330:537-543. [CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Godowski PJ, Leung DW, Meacham LR, et al. Characterization of the human growth hormone receptor gene and demonstration of a partial gene deletion in two patients with Laron-type dwarfism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:8083-8087. [Free Full Text]
  19. de Vos A, Ultsch M, Kossiakoff AA. Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: crystal structure of the complex. Science 1992;255:306-312. [Free Full Text]
  20. Amselem S, Duquesnoy P, Duriez B, et al. Spectrum of growth hormone receptor mutations and associated haplotypes in Laron syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1993;2:355-359. [Free Full Text]
  21. Vidal-Puig A, Moller DE. Comparative sensitivity of alternative single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) methods. Biotechniques 1994;17:490-496. [Medline]
  22. Ravnik-Glavac M, Glavac D, Dean M. Sensitivity of single-strand conformation polymorphism and heteroduplex method for mutation detection in the cystic fibrosis gene. Hum Mol Genet 1994;3:801-807. [Free Full Text]
  23. Laron Z. Laron syndrome: from description to therapy. Endocrinologist 1993;3:21-8.
  24. Rosenbloom AL, Guevara-Aguirre J, Rosenfeld RG, Fielder PJ. Is there heterozygote expression of growth hormone receptor deficiency? Acta Paediatr Suppl 1994;399:125-127. [Medline]
  25. Aguirre A, Donnadieu M, Job J-C. High-affinity serum growth-hormone-binding protein, absent in Laron-type dwarfism, is diminished in heterozygous parents. Horm Res 1990;34:4-8. [Medline]
  26. Laron Z, Klinger B, Erster B, Silbergeld A. Serum GH binding protein activities identifies the heterozygous carriers for Laron type dwarfism. Acta Endocrinol Suppl (Copenh) 1989;121:603-608. 
  27. Baumgartner JW, Wells CA, Chen CM, Waters MJ. The role of the WSXWS equivalent motif in growth hormone receptor function. J Biol Chem 1994;269:29094-29101. [Free Full Text]
Appendix

In addition to the study authors, the Growth Hormone Insensitivity Study Group includes P. Blackett, S. Casella, S. Clark, D. Donaldson, J. Gonzalez, D. Jelley, R. Levy, M. MacGillivray, R. Mauseth, W. Moore, P. Saenger, J. Vandermeulen, and D. Wilson.


 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.