The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correction to Sung et al., N Engl J Med 332(3):139-142 January 19, 1995.

Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 333:190-192 July 20, 1995 Number 3
NextNext

Antibacterial Treatment of Gastric Ulcers

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Sung, J. J.Y.
-Related Article
 by Sung, J. J.Y.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Sung et al. (Jan. 19 issue)1 reported that in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric ulcers unrelated to the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, "one week of antibacterial therapy without acid suppression heals the ulcers as well as omeprazole and reduces the rate of their recurrence." The authors imply that they have proved that therapy directed against H. pylori, and not against ulcers, cures ulcers. There are a number of ways to accelerate ulcer healing without using antisecretory drugs (such as sucralfate or bismuth subcitrate). In our view, Sung et al. actually showed that two regimens that had previously been shown to accelerate ulcer healing were approximately equally effective. Their description of bismuth subcitrate as an antibacterial agent is very misleading, because it is an extremely effective antiulcer agent independently of its antimicrobial activity. Colloidal bismuth subcitrate is an effective antiulcer agent whose effectiveness is not limited to ulcers associated with H. pylori.2,3 Other bismuth preparations do not appear to have similar behavior with respect to experimental ulcers. For example, histochemical staining has been used to compare the ability of bismuth subnitrate, bismuth subcarbonate, bismuth subsalicylate, and colloidal bismuth subcitrate to coat experimental gastric ulcers in rats.3 When colloidal bismuth subcitrate was administered, bismuth was deposited in a uniform layer covering the ulcer base. The histochemical staining of the ulcer base was negative with the other bismuth salts and remained negative even when the concentrations of bismuth subcarbonate or bismuth subnitrate were increased by a factor of 5. Subsequent studies have demonstrated important differences between different formulations of bismuth subcitrate; colloidal bismuth subcitrate is effective in preventing ulceration in Shay rats, whereas noncolloidal bismuth subcitrate is not.4


David Y. Graham, M.D.
Mae F. Go, M.D.
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Houston, TX 77030

References

  1. Sung JJY, Chung SCS, Ling TKW, et al. Antibacterial treatment of gastric ulcers associated with Helicobacter pylori. N Engl J Med 1995;332:139-142. [Free Full Text]
  2. Hall DW. Review of the modes of action of colloidal bismuth subcitrate. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1989;157:3-6. [Medline]
  3. Koo J, Ho J, Lam SK, Wong J, Ong GB. Selective coating of gastric ulcer by tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate in the rat. Gastroenterology 1982;82:864-870. [Medline]
  4. Lavy UI, Koekkoek PH, Jaitly KD. Anti-ulcer activity of colloidal bismuth subcitrate in Shay-rats. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1976;224:291-298. [Medline]

 
To the Editor: Sung et al. randomly assigned patients to receive either omeprazole or a course of bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline, metronidazole, and antacid tablets (Mylanta). The amount of antacid taken by the patients is not reported, nor is it clear whether they were allowed to take their own antacids. Bismuth compounds and antacids both have ulcer-healing properties equivalent to those of ranitidine.1,2 It is possible that the combination of bismuth and antacids may have resulted in substantial healing of the relatively small (average size, <1 cm), uncomplicated ulcers in this study, independently of any antibacterial effects. Study of a group of patients treated with bismuth and antacids alone would be required to rule out this possibility.

The authors do not explain how they determined that H. pylori had been eradicated. In their inclusion criteria, a positive Campylobacter-Like Organism test alone was not considered definitive evidence of infection; a confirmatory smear or culture was required. In the United States, the gold standard for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection includes antral biopsy for histologic analysis after the application of special stains.3

It is also not clear how the one-year follow-up evaluation was conducted. did all patients undergo endoscopy again, or only those with symptoms? Was the endoscopist blinded to the patients' original treatment groups? This information is important for the interpretation of the data.


Douglas O. Faigel, M.D.
David C. Metz, M.D.
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Philadelphia, PA 19104

References

  1. Wagner S, Gebel M, Haruma K, et al. Bismuth subsalicylate in the treatment of H2 blocker resistant duodenal ulcers: role of Helicobacter pylori. Gut 1992;33:179-183. [Free Full Text]
  2. Hunter JO, Walker RJ, Crowe J, et al. Double-blind randomized multicenter study comparing Maalox TC tablets and ranitidine in healing of duodenal ulcers. Dig Dis Sci 1991;36:911-916. [Medline]
  3. Brown KE, Peura DA. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1993;22:105-115. [Medline]

 
To the Editor: How many patients with gastric ulcer did Sung et al. exclude before they identified 100 patients with ulcers associated with H. pylori for the study? What was meant by the statement that "patients were excluded if they . . . had received antibacterial therapy in the past"? Does this mean they were excluded if they had received antibacterial therapy for ulcer disease or antibacterial therapy for any reason within the preceding six months, or is there some other explanation?


Harry E. Salyards, M.D.
606 N. Minnesota Ave.
Hastings, NE 68901-5297


 
To the Editor: Of the 40 patients treated with omeprazole alone, H. pylori was eradicated in 5. This somewhat surprising outcome may represent a false negative result due to the redistribution of H. pylori from the antrum to the body and fundus of the stomach that occurs during omeprazole therapy.1 This effect of omeprazole considerably lessens the sensitivity of antral biopsy for detecting H. pylori in patients who are taking the drug.

Using a one-week regimen of bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline, and metronidazole, Sung et al. found in an intention-to-treat analysis that H. pylori was eradicated in 41 of 48 patients (85.4 percent). We believe the intention-to-treat analysis should include all 51 patients who were randomized and fulfilled the entry criteria. The inclusion of these patients would decrease the rate of eradication of H. pylori to 80.4 percent.


Adam Harris, M.R.C.P.
J.J. Misiewicz, F.R.C.P.
Central Middlesex Hospital
London NW10 7NS, United Kingdom

References

  1. Logan RPH, Walker MM, Misiewicz JJ, Gummett PA, Karim QN, Baron JH. Changes in the intragastric distribution of Helicobacter pylori during treatment with omeprazole. Gut 1995;36:12-16. [Free Full Text]

 
To the Editor: The 95 percent confidence intervals in the article by Sung et al. are expressed as accurate to 0.1 percent, when in fact they vary from the exact 95 percent confidence intervals by 1.0 to 4.1 percent.


Terry Fagan, M.D.
Wilkes-Barre Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Plains, PA 18711


 
The authors reply:

To the Editor: We excluded patients who had used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, those with ulcer bleeding in the previous four weeks, and those who had received antibacterial therapy for H. pylori infection in the past. During the two-year study period, 1233 patients with gastric ulcers were seen in our unit. Of these, 920 presented with bleeding gastric ulcers. The remaining 313 patients had nonbleeding gastric ulcers, including 32 who had taken nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, 72 with a negative urease test, 58 with concomitant duodenal ulcers, 44 who were older than 70 years and had premorbid conditions, 4 who had previously received anti-helicobacter therapy, and 3 who were offered surgery for gastric-outlet obstruction. These patients were excluded from the study. Thus, 100 patients were studied.

Infection with H. pylori was considered to have been eradicated if the results of the Campylobacter-Like Organism test, smears, and cultures were negative five weeks after randomization (i.e., four weeks after the completion of antibacterial therapy). After ulcer healing was confirmed by endoscopy, the patients were asked to return for a one-year follow-up evaluation. All patients were offered a repeated endoscopy by an endoscopist blinded to their previous treatment.

We acknowledge that bismuth subcitrate and antacids are effective ulcer-healing agents that might have caused healing of the ulcers in the triple-therapy group (bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline, and metronidazole). Previous data have shown that 70 to 90 percent of ulcers heal when treated with bismuth for four to eight weeks.1,2,3 Multiple mechanisms are involved in the ulcer-healing action of bismuth, but suppression of H. pylori is one of the most important.4 The relatively low relapse rate after treatment with bismuth as compared with H2 antagonists supports this hypothesis.1,2 In our study, bismuth subcitrate was given for seven days as part of the triple therapy. One week of bismuth subcitrate alone is unlikely to achieve the high healing rate — 84.4 percent — noted in the antibacterial-treatment group in our study.

Antacid (Mylanta) was given freely to our patients for symptomatic relief. We did not count the tablets consumed.

As Dr. Fagan observed, a number of the 95 percent confidence intervals were not accurate. We have recalculated them using the exact method rather than one involving approximation (Table 1). 5

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Corrected 95 Percent Confidence Intervals for the Results of Triple Therapy and Omeprazole Therapy, According to a Standard Analysis and an Intention-to-Treat Analysis.

 


Joseph J.Y. Sung, M.D.
S.C. Sydney Chung, M.D.
Man Yee Yung, B.N.
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong

References

  1. Bianchi Porro G, Petrillo M, De Nicola C, Lazzaroni M. A double-blind endoscopic study with De-Nol tablets and cimetidine for duodenal ulcer. Scand J Gastroenterol 1984;19:905-908. [Medline]
  2. Martin DF, Hollanders D, May SJ, Ravenscroft MM, Tweedle DE, Miller JP. Differences in relapse rates of duodenal ulcer after healing with cimetidine or tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate. Lancet 1981;1:7-10. [CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ward M, Halliday C, Cowen AE. A comparison of colloidal bismuth subcitrate tablets and ranitidine in the treatment of chronic duodenal ulcers. Digestion 1986;34:173-177. [Medline]
  4. Marshall BJ, Armstrong JA, Grancis GJ, Nokes NT, Wee SH. Antibacterial action of bismuth in relation to Campylobacter pyloridis colonization and gastritis. Digestion 1987;37:Suppl 2:16-30.
  5. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1981.

 


 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Sung, J. J.Y.
-Related Article
 by Sung, J. J.Y.
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.