The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 333:550-554 August 31, 1995 Number 9
NextNext

Metabolic Effects of Metformin in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus
Michael Stumvoll, M.D., Nurjahan Nurjhan, Ph.D., Gabriele Perriello, M.D., George Dailey, M.D., and John E. Gerich, M.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The metabolic effects and mechanism of action of metformin are still poorly understood, despite the fact that it has been used to treat patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) for more than 30 years.

Methods In 10 obese patients with NIDDM, we used a combination of isotope dilution, indirect calorimetry, bioimpedance, and tissue-balance techniques to assess the effects of metformin on systemic lactate, glucose, and free-fatty-acid turnover; lactate oxidation and the conversion of lactate to glucose; skeletal-muscle glucose and lactate metabolism; body composition; and energy expenditure before and after four months of treatment.

Results Metformin treatment decreased the mean (±SD) glycosylated hemoglobin value from 13.2±2.2 percent to 10.5±1.6 percent (P<0.001) and reduced fasting plasma glucose concentrations from 220±41 to 155±28 mg per deciliter (12.2±0.7 to 8.6±0.5 mmol per liter) (P<0.001). Although resting energy expenditure did not change, the patients lost 2.7±1.3 kg of weight (P<0.001), 88 percent of which was adipose tissue. The mean (±SE) rate of plasma glucose turnover (hepatic glucose output and systemic glucose disposal) decreased from 2.8±0.2 to 2.0±0.2 mg per kilogram of body weight per minute (15.3±0.9 to 10.8±0.9 µmol per kilogram per minute) (P<0.001), as a result of a decrease in hepatic glucose output; systemic glucose clearance did not change. The rate of conversion of lactate to glucose (gluconeogenesis) decreased by 37 percent (P<0.001), whereas lactate oxidation increased by 25 percent (P<0.001). There were no changes in the plasma lactate concentration, plasma lactate turnover, muscle lactate release, plasma free-fatty-acid turnover, or uptake of glucose by muscle.

Conclusions Metformin acts primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose output, largely by inhibiting gluconeogenesis. It also seems to induce weight loss, preferentially involving adipose tissue.


The metabolic abnormalities of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) are generally acknowledged to result from a combination of insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion.1 Since 1975, when the biguanide phenformin was withdrawn from the market,2 the only drugs available to treat NIDDM orally in the United States have been sulfonylureas, which act primarily by improving insulin secretion.3

Another biguanide, metformin, has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although metformin is as effective as the sulfonylureas,4 the drugs differ in several respects: metformin reduces insulin resistance without directly affecting insulin secretion,4,5 causes weight loss rather than weight gain,4 and has lactic acidosis rather than hypoglycemia as its most serious side effect.4

Despite the fact that metformin has been in use for more than 30 years, little is known about its primary mode of action or its effects on body composition, energy balance, and lactate metabolism.4,5 The rate of entry of lactate into plasma and the conversion of lactate to glucose are both increased in patients with NIDDM.6 Metformin reduces hepatic glucose output in NIDDM.7,8,9,10 In vitro studies suggest that this may be due to the inhibition of gluconeogenesis.11,12 Such a mechanism of action might diminish the removal of lactate from plasma and present a risk of lactic acidosis. Phenformin, which was withdrawn from the market because of a high incidence of lactic acidosis,2 impaired lactate disposal and increased its production.13,14 This study was therefore undertaken to determine the primary mechanism by which metformin improves glycemic control in patients with NIDDM and its effects on lactate metabolism, body composition, and energy expenditure.

Methods

Subjects

We studied 10 otherwise healthy obese patients with NIDDM (6 men and 4 women). Their mean (±SD) age was 58±9 years, and their body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 32.1±3.2; their weight had been stable for several months. The mean (±SD) duration of diabetes was 6±3 years. Two patients were being treated with diet, and eight were being treated with sulfonylurea drugs, which were discontinued two weeks before the study. Two patients were taking levothyroxine, two estrogen, one a thiazide, and two an angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitor; these drugs were continued at a constant dose throughout the study. The protocol was approved by the Scripps Clinic Institutional Review Board, and all the patients gave written informed consent.

Study Design

The patients underwent the metabolic studies described below before and at the end of a 16-week period of metformin treatment. They were advised to maintain their usual diet and activities during the study. The initial dose of metformin was 850 mg once daily. It was increased to 1700 mg (850 mg twice daily) and then to 2550 mg (850 mg three times daily) at two-week intervals, unless a patient had a fasting plasma glucose concentration below 140 mg per deciliter (7.8 mmol per liter), but that did not happen. During the final 12 weeks, the patients were seen in the clinic every 4 weeks for a pill count and evaluation.

Metabolic Studies

The patients were admitted to the general clinical research center on the evening before the experiments, having consumed a weight-maintaining diet containing approximately 200 g of carbohydrate and having abstained from alcohol for at least three days. At about 6 p.m., they ate a standard dinner (10 kcal per kilogram of body weight, 50 percent carbohydrate, 35 percent fat, and 15 percent protein). The next morning, at approximately 6 a.m., primed continuous intravenous infusions of [3-14C]lactate (30 µCi, 0.3 µCi per minute) and [6-3H]glucose (30 µCi, 0.3 µCi per minute) were started and a bolus dose of [14C]sodium bicarbonate (50 µCi) was administered intravenously (all from Amersham International, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). About 2.5 hours later, an ipsilateral dorsal hand vein was cannulated retrogradely and placed in a thermoregulated device (65°C) for sampling arterialized venous blood. At approximately the same time, a deep vein in the contralateral arm was cannulated retrogradely for sampling venous blood draining muscle tissue. An hour later, a primed continuous intravenous infusion of [9,10-3H]palmitate (0.3 µCi per minute, Amersham International) was started. At approximately 10 a.m. and every 40 minutes thereafter for 2 hours, blood was drawn simultaneously from the deep vein and the arterialized hand vein for determinations of plasma substrate and hormone concentrations and of the specific activities of glucose, lactate and palmitate. During this 2-hour interval, total carbon dioxide production and oxygen consumption were measured three times for 30-minute periods with a metabolic monitor (Sensormedics, Anaheim, Calif.) and breath samples were collected for the determination of the specific activity of [14C]carbon dioxide. Forearm blood flow was determined immediately before the first and after the last blood sampling with electrocapacitance plethysmography.15

Analytic Procedures

The samples from both the pretreatment and post-treatment studies were analyzed at the same time. Plasma glucose concentrations were measured with a glucose analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument, Yellow Springs, Ohio), plasma lactate by a fluorometric method,15 and plasma free fatty acid by an enzymatic method.16 The specific activities of plasma [3H]glucose, [14C]glucose, and [14C]lactate were measured after lactate and glucose had been isolated with ion-exchange chromatography.17 The concentration and specific activity of plasma palmitate were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.18 Since palmitate represents 30 percent of total plasma free fatty acids, the palmitate results were extrapolated to represent the total plasma free-fatty-acid concentration by dividing the values by 0.30. Total-body muscle mass was calculated from anthropometric measurements according to the equations of Heymsfield et al.19 Carbohydrate oxidation, lipid oxidation, and resting energy expenditure were measured by indirect calorimetry.20 Body composition (fat mass and fat-free mass) was determined by bioelectrical impedance (RJL Systems, Mt. Clemens, Mich.).21

Calculations

The turnover of plasma glucose, lactate, and free fatty acids was calculated with steady-state equations.22 The percentage of glucose derived from lactate was calculated as the specific activity of [14C]glucose ÷ (2 x specific activity of [14C]lactate). Glucose turnover from lactate was calculated by multiplying plasma glucose turnover by the percentage of plasma glucose turnover derived from lactate. Plasma lactate oxidation was calculated as (VCO2 x specific activity of [14C]carbon dioxide) ÷ (specific activity of [14C]lactate x 0.81), where VCO2 is carbon dioxide production and the factor 0.81 is introduced to correct for the retention of [14C]carbon dioxide in the bicarbonate pool.6 The clearance of plasma glucose and lactate was calculated as the turnover rate of each divided by the arterial concentration. The uptake of glucose by the forearm was determined by multiplying the arteriovenous difference in the glucose concentration by the forearm blood flow (expressed as milliliters per 100 ml of tissue per minute). Forearm net balance, fractional extraction, and the uptake and release of lactate were calculated with standard formulas.23 Values per 100 ml of forearm tissue were converted to values per kilogram of forearm muscle as previously described23 and were then extrapolated to represent whole-body muscle by multiplying the values by total-body muscle mass. The clearance of muscle glucose and lactate was calculated by dividing the uptake of each by the arterial concentration.

Statistical Analysis

Unless stated otherwise, the results are expressed as means ±SE. Plasma glucose, lactate, and free-fatty-acid results represent the mean of four samplings at metabolic steady state. Data before and after treatment with metformin were compared by two-tailed Student's t-test for paired samples and by least-squares regression analysis with a commercially available software package (CSS Statistica, Tulsa, Okla.).

Results

Dosage and Symptoms

All patients received 2550 mg of metformin daily for the last 12 weeks of the 16-week treatment period. Compliance, as determined by regular pill counts, exceeded 95 percent. Most patients initially had some slight abdominal discomfort, bloating, and altered sense of taste lasting one to four weeks. All acknowledged having a mild persistent decrease in appetite.

Weight Loss, Body Composition, and Energy Expenditure

The patients lost approximately 3 kg of weight (Table 1) despite the absence of change in resting energy expenditure or self-reported physical activity. A decrease in body fat mass accounted for about 88 percent of the weight loss, whereas lean body mass did not change.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of Metformin on Body Composition, Energy Expenditure, and Glycemic Control in Patients with NIDDM.

 
Glycemic Control and Systemic Glucose Metabolism

Both fasting plasma glucose concentrations and glycosylated hemoglobin values decreased substantially, as did plasma insulin concentrations; plasma glucagon concentrations did not change. The rate of plasma glucose turnover (hepatic glucose output and systemic glucose disposal) decreased from 2.8±0.2 to 2.0±0.2 mg per kilogram per minute (15.3±0.9 to 10.8±0.9 µmol per kilogram per minute, P<0.001) (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 2, hepatic glucose output and fasting plasma glucose concentrations both before and after metformin treatment were highly correlated (r = 0.76, P<0.001). Although metformin did not alter the rate of systemic glucose clearance (1.3±0.1 ml per kilogram per minute before treatment vs. 1.3±0.1 ml per kilogram per minute afterward, P = 0.90) or carbohydrate oxidation (0.8±0.1 vs. 0.8±0.1 mg per kilogram per minute [4.6±0.3 vs. 4.6±0.3 µmol per kilogram per minute], P = 0.94), the proportion of glucose disposal accounted for by oxidation increased significantly, from 32±4 to 45±4 percent (P<0.001).


View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentrations, Clearance, and Turnover and Rates of Carbohydrate Oxidation before and after Metformin Treatment in Patients with NIDDM.

To convert values for plasma glucose to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.05551; to convert oxidation and turnover values to micromoles per kilogram per minute, multiply by 5.551. Means ±SE are shown, as well as the values for individual subjects.

 

View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Correlation of Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentrations with Hepatic Glucose Output (Circles) and Lactate Gluconeogenesis (Diamonds) before and after Metformin Treatment in Patients with NIDDM.

Open symbols refer to pretreatment values, and solid symbols to post-treatment values. To convert values for hepatic glucose output to micromoles per kilogram per minute, multiply by 5.551; to convert values for plasma glucose to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.05551.

 
Muscle Glucose Metabolism

Metformin treatment did not alter forearm blood flow, skeletal-muscle mass, or skeletal-muscle glucose uptake (Table 2). The clearance of glucose by muscle increased, as did the proportion of systemic glucose disposal accounted for by muscle.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of Metformin on Skeletal-Muscle Glucose and Lactate Metabolism in Patients with NIDDM.

 
Systemic and Muscle Lactate Metabolism

Metformin treatment did not significantly alter the mean fasting plasma lactate concentration (Table 1) or the rate of plasma lactate turnover (15.2±1.4 µmol per kilogram per minute before treatment vs. 14.4±1.3 µmol per kilogram per minute afterward, P = 0.40) (Figure 3). However, the rate of plasma lactate oxidation increased by 25 percent (from 6.3±0.6 to 7.9±0.6 µmol per kilogram per minute, P<0.001), whereas the rate of conversion of plasma lactate to plasma glucose decreased by 37 percent (from 7.3±0.7 to 4.6±0.6 µmol per kilogram per minute, P<0.001). Both before and after metformin treatment, the rate of conversion of lactate to glucose and the fasting plasma glucose concentration were highly correlated (r = 0.64, P = 0.002) (Figure 2).


View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Plasma Lactate Turnover, Clearance, and Oxidation and Rates of Conversion of Lactate to Glucose before and after Metformin Treatment in Patients with NIDDM.

Means ±SE are shown, as well as the values for individualsubjects.

 
Metformin treatment did not alter the clearance, fractional extraction, uptake, or release of lactate by muscle (Table 2).

Plasma Free Fatty Acids and Lipid Metabolism

The mean plasma cholesterol concentration decreased, whereas the mean plasma triglyceride concentration, plasma free-fatty-acid concentration and turnover rate, and whole-body lipid oxidation did not change after metformin treatment (Table 3).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effect of Metformin Treatment on Plasma Free Fatty Acids and Lipid Metabolism in Patients with NIDDM.

 
Discussion

In this study, metformin led to an improvement in glycemic control similar to that reported in large, controlled clinical trials.4 This improvement was attributable primarily to a reduction in hepatic glucose output, since overall glucose disposal decreased and the rate of systemic glucose clearance did not change. Furthermore, the reduction in hepatic glucose output could be accounted for largely by the inhibition of gluconeogenesis.

After metformin treatment, hepatic glucose output decreased by 0.7 mg (4.5 µmol) per kilogram per minute and the amount of glucose produced from lactate decreased by 0.2 mg (1.4 µmol) per kilogram per minute. Conventional isotopic measurements of the incorporation of lactate into glucose underestimate the amount of lactate converted to glucose by as much as 40 percent,6 because of the dilution of radiolabeled carbon in the Krebs cycle. Moreover, the incorporation of lactate into plasma glucose normally accounts for only about 60 percent of overall gluconeogenesis.24 Taking these factors into consideration, we estimate that metformin could have reduced overall gluconeogenesis by as much as 0.6 mg (3.3 µmol) per kilogram per minute. Such a decrease would account for approximately 75 percent of the reduction in hepatic glucose output.

Our results are consistent with those of in vitro studies demonstrating that metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis11,25 and those of clinical studies indicating that most of the increase in hepatic glucose output in patients with NIDDM is due to increased gluconeogenesis.6 Our results, however, do not exclude the possibility that metformin may also inhibit glycogenolysis.

Despite the reduced use of lactate for gluconeogenesis during metformin treatment, neither the plasma lactate concentration nor the rate of plasma lactate turnover was changed. Our finding that metformin increases lactate oxidation provides at least a partial explanation for this phenomenon and indicates that metformin differs considerably from phenformin in its effects on lactate metabolism.

Treatment with phenformin increases the plasma lactate concentration and entry of lactate into plasma,26 inhibits lactate oxidation,14 impairs oxidative phosphorylation,13 and increases the release of lactate from muscle.27 Metformin increased lactate oxidation and the proportion of glucose disposal undergoing oxidation while not altering the release of lactate from muscle. These differences may explain why phenformin is associated with a 10-fold to 20-fold greater incidence of lactic acidosis than metformin.4 Nevertheless, under conditions impairing the oxidative removal of lactate, the reduced rate of removal of lactate from plasma resulting from decreased conversion of lactate to glucose by metformin could cause excessive increases in plasma lactate and, possibly, lactic acidosis.

Like previous investigators,7,28 we found that energy expenditure did not change during metformin treatment. Since our patients all had a decrease in appetite and denied any change in physical activity, the weight loss accompanying metformin treatment was probably attributable to reduced caloric intake. An unexpected finding was that the weight loss during metformin treatment was largely accounted for by the loss of adipose tissue. In previous studies of body composition in people eating calorically restricted diets,29,30 both fat and lean body mass decreased. For example, in a diet study in which subjects lost amounts of adipose tissue similar to those lost in the present study, the loss of lean body mass averaged 1.5 kg,30 five times more than the small, nonsignificant loss found in the present study.

Differential effects of metformin on adipose tissue and muscle may explain the apparent selective loss of adipose tissue. Whereas the results of in vitro studies31 and this study indicate that metformin improves insulin sensitivity in muscle glucose metabolism, it does not affect the antilipolytic action of insulin on adipose tissue.32 Since plasma insulin concentrations decrease during metformin treatment,4 one would expect lipolysis to increase. On the other hand, if the metformin-induced increase in the sensitivity of muscle to insulin included an anticatabolic effect of insulin on protein metabolism, one would expect no change in lean tissue mass.

In many4,8 but by no means all studies,7,9,10 metformin treatment was accompanied by an improvement in insulin-stimulated systemic glucose disposal. We found that the uptake of glucose by muscle did not decrease despite a reduction in plasma glucose concentrations, indicating that the efficiency of muscle glucose uptake was increased. This increase was documented by our finding of an increase in the clearance of glucose by muscle. Since these changes occurred despite the presence of reduced plasma insulin concentrations, it appears that metformin treatment improved the sensitivity of muscle to insulin. However, whether this improvement represents a direct effect on muscle or an indirect effect due to weight loss33 or a decrease in glucose-induced insulin resistance34 is unclear.

In conclusion, metformin treatment improves glycemic control and decreases fasting hyperglycemia in patients with NIDDM, primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose output, an effect largely accounted for by the inhibition of gluconeogenesis. Metformin improves the sensitivity of muscle to insulin and the oxidative disposal of glucose and lactate in the whole body, while not altering muscle lactate metabolism, the plasma lactate concentration, or plasma lactate turnover. Finally, weight loss associated with metformin treatment appears to involve a preferential loss of adipose tissue.

Supported in part by grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-20411); the National Institutes of Health, Division of Research Resources, General Clinical Research Center (5MO1-RR 00044 and 5MO1-RR 000954); Lipha Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Stu-192/1-2, to Dr. Stumvoll). Dr. Stumvoll is on leave of absence from the Medizinische Klinik der Universität Tübingen, Germany.

We are indebted to the staff members of the general clinical research center, especially Ms. Marcia Hankammer, Ms. Carolyn Koumaras, and Ms. Sue Dastrup; to the study patients; and to our laboratory personnel for their excellent technical help.


Source Information

From the University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York (M.S., N.N., G.P., J.E.G.), and the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, Calif. (G.D.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Gerich at the University of Rochester School of Medicine, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box Med/CRC, Rochester, NY 14642.

References

  1. Dinneen S, Gerich J, Rizza R. Carbohydrate metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1992;327:707-713. [Medline]
  2. Williams RH, Palmer JP. Farewell to phenformin for treating diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 1975;83:567-568.
  3. Gerich JE. Oral hypoglycemic agents. N Engl J Med 1989;321:1231-1245. [Medline]
  4. Bailey CJ. Biguanides and NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1992;15:755-772. [Abstract]
  5. Vigneri R, Goldfine ID. Role of metformin in treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1987;10:118-122. [Abstract]
  6. Consoli A, Nurjhan N, Reilly JJ Jr, Bier DM, Gerich JE. Mechanism of increased gluconeogenesis in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: role of alterations in systemic, hepatic, and muscle lactate and alanine metabolism. J Clin Invest 1990;86:2038-2045.
  7. Perriello G, Misericordia P, Volpi E, et al. Acute antihyperglycemic mechanisms of metformin in NIDDM: evidence for suppression of lipid oxidation and hepatic glucose production. Diabetes 1994;43:920-928. [Abstract]
  8. Nosadini R, Avogaro A, Trevisian R, et al. Effect of metformin on insulin-stimulated glucose turnover and insulin binding to receptors in type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 1987;10:62-67. [Abstract]
  9. DeFronzo RA, Barzilai N, Simonson DC. Mechanism of metformin action in obese and lean noninsulin-dependent diabetic subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;73:1294-1301. [Abstract]
  10. Jackson RA, Hawa MI, Jaspan JB, et al. Mechanism of metformin action in noninsulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes 1987;36:632-640. [Abstract]
  11. Wollen N, Bailey CJ. Inhibition of hepatic gluconeogenesis by metformin: synergism with insulin. Biochem Pharmacol 1988;37:4353-4358. [CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Alengrin F, Grossi G, Canivet B, Dolais-Kitabgi J. Inhibitory effects of metformin on insulin and glucagon action in rat hepatocytes involve post-receptor alterations. Diabetes Metab 1987;13:591-597. 
  13. Schäfer G. Guanidines and biguanidines. Pharmacol Ther 1980;8:275-295. [Medline]
  14. Searle GL, Siperstein MD. Lactic acidosis associated with phenformin therapy: evidence that inhibited lactate oxidation is the causative factor. Diabetes 1975;24:741-745. [Abstract]
  15. Kelley D, Mitrakou A, Marsh H, et al. Skeletal muscle glycolysis, oxidation, and storage of an oral glucose load. J Clin Invest 1988;81:1563-1571.
  16. Shimizu S, Tani Y, Yamada H, Tabata M, Murachi T. Enzymatic determination of serum-free fatty acids: a colorimetric method. Anal Biochem 1980;107:193-198. [CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Consoli A, Kennedy F, Miles J, Gerich J. Determination of Krebs cycle metabolic carbon exchange in vivo and its use to estimate the individual contributions of gluconeogenesis glycogenolysis to overall glucose output in man. J Clin Invest 1987;80:1303-1310.
  18. Miles JM, Ellman MG, McClean KL, Jensen MD. Validation of a new method for determination of free fatty acid turnover. Am J Physiol 1987;252:E431-E438. [Free Full Text]
  19. Heymsfield S, McManus C, Stevens V, Smith J. Muscle mass: reliable indicator of protein-energy malnutrition severity and outcome. Am J Clin Nutr 1982;35:Suppl:1192-1199. [Free Full Text]
  20. Ferrannini E. The theoretical bases of indirect calorimetry: a review. Metabolism 1988;37:287-301. [CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Lukaski HC. Methods for the assessment of human body composition: traditional and new. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;46:537-556. [Free Full Text]
  22. Wolfe R. Radioactive and stable isotope tracers in biomedicine: principles and practice of kinetic analysis. New York: Wiley–Liss, 1992.
  23. Consoli A, Nurjhan N, Reilly JJ Jr, Bier DM, Gerich JE. Contribution of liver and skeletal muscle to alanine and lactate metabolism in humans. Am J Physiol 1990;259:E677-E685. [Erratum, J Physiol 1991;261:after table of contents.] [Free Full Text]
  24. Gerich JE. Control of glycaemia. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;7:551-586. [CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Argaud D, Roth H, Wiernsperger N, Leverve XM. Metformin decreases gluconeogenesis by enhancing the pyruvate kinase flux in isolated rat hepatocytes. Eur J Biochem 1993;213:1341-1348. [Medline]
  26. Kreisberg RA, Pennington LF, Boshell BR. Lactate turnover and gluconeogenesis in obesity: effect of phenformin. Diabetes 1970;19:64-69. [Medline]
  27. Williams RH, Steiner DF. Summarization of studies relative to the mechanism of the phenethylbiguanide hypoglycemia. Metabolism 1959;8:548-552. [Medline]
  28. Leslie P, Jung RT, Isles TE, Baty J. Energy expenditure in non-insulin dependent diabetic subjects on metformin or sulfonylurea therapy. Clin Sci 1987;73:41-45. [Medline]
  29. Luke A, Schoeller DA. Basal metabolic rate, fat-free mass, and body cell mass during energy restriction. Metabolism 1992;41:450-456. [CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Hendler R, Bonde AA. Effects of sucrose on resting metabolic rate, nitrogen balance, leucine turnover and oxidation during weight loss with low calorie diets. Int J Obes 1990;14:927-938. [Medline]
  31. Klip A, Leiter LA. Cellular mechanism of action of metformin. Diabetes Care 1990;13:696-704. [Abstract]
  32. Cigolini M, Bosello O, Zancanaro C, Orlandi PG, Fezzi O, Smith U. Influence of metformin on metabolic effect of insulin in human adipose tissue in vitro. Diabetes Metab 1984;10:311-315. 
  33. Wing RR, Blair EH, Bononi P, Marcus MD, Watanabe R, Bergman RN. Caloric restriction per se is a significant factor in improvements in glycemic control and insulin sensitivity during weight loss in obese NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care 1994;17:30-36. [Abstract]
  34. Yki-Järvinen H. Glucose toxicity. Endocr Rev 1992;13:415-431. [CrossRef][Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.