Clinical and Pathological Features of Ovarian Cancer in Women with Germ-Line Mutations of BRCA1
Stephen C. Rubin, M.D., Ivor Benjamin, M.D., Kian Behbakht, M.D., Hiroyuki Takahashi, M.D., Ph.D., Mark A. Morgan, M.D., Virginia A. LiVolsi, M.D., Andrew Berchuck, M.D., Michael G. Muto, M.D., Judy E. Garber, M.D., Barbara L. Weber, M.D., Henry T. Lynch, M.D., and Jeff Boyd, Ph.D.
Background We tested the hypothesis that ovarian cancers associatedwith germ-line mutations of BRCA1 have distinct clinical andpathological features as compared with sporadic ovarian cancers.
Methods We reviewed clinical and pathological data on patientswith primary epithelial ovarian cancer found to have germ-linemutations of BRCA1. Survival among patients with advanced-stagecancer and such mutations was compared with that in controlpatients matched for age and stage, grade, and histologic subtypeof the tumors. A combination of single-strand conformation andsequencing analyses was used to examine the 22 coding exonsand intronic splice-donor and splice-acceptor regions of BRCA1for mutations in pathological specimens. Alternatively, somepatients were known to be obligate carriers of the mutant BRCA1gene because of their parental relationships with documentedmutant-gene carriers.
Results We identified 53 patients with germ-line mutations ofBRCA1. The average age at diagnosis was 48 years (range, 28to 78). Histologic examination in 43 of the 53 patients showedserous adenocarcinoma. Thirty-seven tumors were of grade 3,11 were of grade 2, 2 were of grade 1, and 3 were of low malignantpotential. In 38 patients, the tumors were of stage III; 9 patients(including those with tumors of low malignant potential) hadstage I disease, 5 had stage IV, and 1 had stage II. As of June1996, with a median follow-up among survivors of 71 months fromdiagnosis, 20 patients had died of ovarian cancer, 27 had noevidence of the disease, 4 were alive with the disease, and2 had died of other diseases. Actuarial median survival forthe 43 patients with advanced-stage disease was 77 months, ascompared with 29 months for the matched controls (P<0.001).
Conclusions As compared with sporadic ovarian cancers, cancersassociated with BRCA1 mutations appear to have a significantlymore favorable clinical course.
Adenocarcinoma of the ovary causes the death of more Americanwomen each year than all other gynecologic cancers combined.About 5 to 10 percent of ovarian cancers are familial, and severalfamilial-cancer syndromes that include ovarian cancer have beenidentified.1 In most families affected with the breast-and-ovarian-cancersyndrome or site-specific ovarian cancer, genetic linkage hasbeen found to the BRCA1 locus on chromosome 17q21.2,3 Allelicdeletion at the BRCA1 locus in tumors from these linked familymembers invariably involves the wild-type chromosome, suggestingthat BRCA1 functions as a tumor-suppressor gene.4 The cloningof BRCA15 has allowed direct identification of BRCA1 mutationsin both sporadic and hereditary ovarian cancer. Although allelicdeletions in the region of the BRCA1 locus are common in sporadicovarian cancers, the recent finding that BRCA1 mutations insporadic tumors are rare suggests the involvement of an additionaltumor-suppressor gene in this region of chromosome 17q.6
The likelihood that distinct molecular abnormalities contributeto the pathogenesis of hereditary and sporadic ovarian cancersraises the question of whether these tumors also have distinctclinical and histopathological characteristics. In this report,we examine the clinical and pathological characteristics ofovarian cancers in 53 women with documented germ-line mutationsof BRCA1.
Methods
Mutational Analysis
The molecular-analysis technique used in our laboratory hasbeen described in detail elsewhere.6 This technique, or minorvariations of it, was also used at the centers participatingin this study. In brief, specimens of epithelial ovarian cancerwere obtained from the tissue-bank archives of the participatinginstitutions. The study was approved by the respective institutionalreview boards, and informed consent was obtained before tissuecollection and analysis. Corresponding normal tissues used forthe analysis of germ-line DNA were either peripheral-blood lymphocytesor normal gynecologic tissues removed at the time of surgery.All tumors used in this study were obtained from primary-siteovarian cancers in previously untreated patients.
The polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify genomic DNAfor single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Intron-basedprimers surrounding each of the 22 exons of BRCA1 were used,with the exceptions that 16 overlapping primer sets were usedto examine exon 11 and that 2 additional primer sets were designedto amplify exons 6 and 7 as two separate products. Exons 1 and4 are noncoding and were not examined. All variants of single-strandconformation polymorphisms were examined by direct sequenceanalysis to determine mutations. Alternatively, some patientswere obligate carriers of the mutant BRCA1 gene, on the basisof their parental relationships with documented mutant-genecarriers, as determined by pedigree analysis.
Pathological and Clinical Analyses
At each participating center, investigators identified all thepatients with ovarian cancer who had germ-line mutations ofBRCA1 and for whom the necessary pathological and clinical datawere available, including the date of diagnosis; age; stage,histologic subtype, and grade of the tumor; and clinical follow-up.It was not necessary for the patients to have been seen at theparticipating institution. In many instances, clinical carehad been rendered in the community, and patients were identifiedas carriers of BRCA1 mutations only after death, through molecularanalysis of archival specimens or pedigree analysis initiatedby a relative. The data were abstracted from the medical recordsand recorded in a spreadsheet for statistical analysis. Patientsfor whom histologic specimens were available and reviewed included11 patients at the University of Pennsylvania and 3 at DukeUniversity.
The long-term survival of the patients with mutant BRCA1 geneswas compared with that of a control group of patients with ovariancancer selected from the clinical data base of the Society ofGynecologic Oncologists in use at the University of Pennsylvaniasince 1989, which currently contains data on 594 patients withovarian cancer.7 Each patient was matched to a control subjectfor age (within five years) and tumor stage, histologic subtype,and grade. All the controls had had their disease diagnoseda minimum of three years before the time of analysis, and nonehad family histories suggestive of hereditary cancer syndromes.Survival data were calculated by the method of Kaplan and Meier8 and compared by the log-rank test.9
Results
A total of 53 patients with ovarian cancer and germ-line mutationsof BRCA1 were identified: 29 from the University of Pennsylvania,9 from Creighton University, 8 from DanaFarber CancerInstitute, 4 from Duke University, and 3 from Brigham and Women'sHospital. BRCA1 mutations were identified in 45 patients bymolecular analysis, and 8 patients were determined to be obligatemutation carriers by pedigree analysis. The mean age at diagnosisamong the 53 patients was 48 years (range, 28 to 78); the meanin the control group was 49 years. Table 1 shows the stage,histologic grade, and histologic subtype of the tumors fromthe 53 women. Two of the tumors of low malignant potential wereof the serous type; one was mucinous.
Table 1. Stage, Grade, and Histologic Subtype of Ovarian Cancers Occurring in 53 Women with Germ-line Mutations of BRCA1.
The median follow-up for all surviving patients was 71 monthsfrom the time of diagnosis. As of June 1996, 20 patients haddied of ovarian cancer a median of 35 months from diagnosis.Twenty-seven remained alive with no evidence of disease, fourremained alive with ovarian cancer, and two had died of otherdiseases with no evidence of ovarian cancer present. Figure 1shows the actuarial survival of the 43 patients with advanced-stagedisease (38 with stage III and 5 with stage IV) as comparedwith the survival of the matched control group. The differencein survival is significant at the P<0.001 level. There wasno correlation between any of the clinicopathological featureswe examined and a particular BRCA1 mutation.
Figure 1. Actuarial Survival among 43 Patients with Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer and Germ-Line BRCA1 Mutations, as Compared with Matched Controls without Such Mutations.
P<0.001 by the log-rank test. The triangles and inverted triangles indicate the durations of follow-up among surviving patients.
Discussion
In our study of the clinical features of ovarian cancers inwomen with documented germ-line mutations of the BRCA1 gene,the average age at diagnosis, 48 years, was more than 10 yearsless than the mean age of 61 reported in a large sample of patientswith ovarian cancer.10 Tumors of the serous type, which constituteabout 46 percent of all epithelial ovarian carcinomas,11 predominateamong women with BRCA1 mutations. The distribution of patientsaccording to stage and grade appears fairly typical, and itis apparent that tumors of low malignant potential can arisein association with BRCA1 mutations. Because our patients wereseen at several institutions and in some cases received primarytreatment elsewhere, some relevant clinical information, includingthe extent of surgical tumor resection and the type of chemotherapyused, was not available. From the information we obtained, however,it appears that hereditary ovarian cancers arising in associationwith germ-line mutations of BRCA1 may differ substantially fromthose that arise sporadically.
The survival of patients with BRCA1 mutations and advanced-stageovarian cancers appears to be notably longer than the survivalof matched controls not known to have hereditary cancers. Ouradvanced-stage control group had an actuarial median survivalof 29 months, similar to that typically seen in patients withadvanced ovarian cancer before the advent of paclitaxel chemotherapy,12whereas the BRCA1-related cases have an actuarial median survivalof 77 months (P<0.001).
The selection of a historical control group must always be approachedcautiously, but it is likely that our use of the control groupwe selected actually resulted in an underestimate of the magnitudeof the survival difference. There is strong evidence from large-scaleprospective, randomized trials that a patient's age is an importantindependent prognostic factor for survival in advanced-stageovarian cancer.13 By selecting age-matched controls, we defineda population of relatively young patients with ovarian cancer,who on the basis of age alone would be expected to have morefavorable outcomes than older patients.
The youth of the control group also increased the likelihoodthat patients with undetected BRCA1 mutations were includedin this group. In two recent studies of patients with breastcancer who were 35 years of age or younger, 7.5 percent of thewomen under 3514 and 13 percent of the women under 3015 werefound to have BRCA1 mutations that were unsuspected on the basisof their family histories. In view of the considerable survivaladvantage among patients known to have BRCA1-related ovariancancers, it seems likely that a factor in the favorable prognosisof younger women with ovarian cancer is the relatively highfrequency of BRCA1 mutations in this population. Our controlpopulation was made up of women who were treated relativelyrecently by gynecologic oncologists at an academic medical center a fact that might improve their survival relative tothat of the patients with BRCA1 mutations, many of whom weretreated less recently in a community setting16: in 16 of the43 patients (37 percent) with advanced-stage cancer in our series,as compared with 10 of 43 controls (23 percent), the diseasewas diagnosed before 1986.
The process we used to identify patients with BRCA1-relatedovarian cancer was intended to yield a representative population,without favoring long-term survivors. All such patients identifiedat each participating institution for whom the basic clinicalinformation was available were included. There was no requirementfor the patients to have been treated at the institution. Inmany instances, cases of BRCA1-related ovarian cancer were identifiedby molecular analysis of tissue blocks at the request of relativesafter the patients' deaths. In addition, the participation ofseveral investigators at different institutions in the processof identifying patients should lessen the possibility of a selectionbias.
In some previous reports of the clinical characteristics ofcancers that arise in association with predisposing germ-linemutations, patients were identified by linkage analysis or examinationof family pedigrees; this process left open the possibilitythat sporadic cases were also included. In a report on 35 patientswith breast cancer who were probable carriers of a BRCA1 mutation,on the basis of linkage analysis, Porter et al.17 suggestedthat these patients had a relatively indolent clinical course,but they did not include prognostic factors, such as tumor stageand grade. Eisinger et al.18 found a higher incidence of poorlydifferentiated tumors in 27 patients with breast cancer anddocumented germ-line BRCA1 mutations but did not report on follow-upor survival in this group. Marcus et al.19 studied patientswith BRCA1-related breast cancer and other forms of hereditarybreast cancer, including BRCA2-related cases, and found thatthe BRCA1-related hereditary breast cancers were more frequentlyaneuploid and showed higher tumor-proliferation rates than theother hereditary cases. Although there were adverse prognosticfeatures in the BRCA1-related patients, they had paradoxicallylower recurrence rates than the other patients with hereditarybreast cancer.
Other evidence suggests a relatively favorable prognosis forhereditary colorectal cancer in patients carrying mutationsof genes responsible for DNA mismatch repair. A recent studyof data from the Finnish Cancer Registry showed significantlylonger recurrence-free survival (at five years) in a group ofpatients with hereditary colorectal cancer than in a controlgroup with sporadic colorectal cancer.20
With regard to ovarian cancer, a previous pedigree analysisfound that a relatively large proportion of possibly hereditaryovarian cancers are of the serous-cell subtype14 but did notprovide information on survival. Interestingly, Buller et al.15compared the survival of 11 patients with family histories ofovarian cancer with that among matched controls who had no suchfamily history; they found longer survival among the women withthe possibly familial cases.
Germ-line BRCA1 mutations occur in only a small proportion ofall ovarian cancers, but they appear to be the most importantprognostic factor yet identified for patients with advanced-stagedisease. The distinctive clinical behavior of BRCA1-relatedovarian cancers could have implications for disease managementand the design of clinical trials. The reasons for the relativelyindolent course of BRCA1-related ovarian cancers are not immediatelyobvious from our data. We have been unable to obtain informationabout some well-known clinical prognostic factors, includingthe extent of tumor before and after initial surgery and thechemotherapy regimens used. It seems likely that explanationswill come from a better understanding of the function of theBRCA1 tumor-suppressor gene and that the difference in clinicalbehavior between BRCA1-related and sporadic ovarian cancersreflects distinct profiles of somatic mutations in other cancer-relatedgenes.
Source Information
From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.C.R., I.B., K.B., H.T., M.A.M., J.B.), the Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (V.A.L.), and the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine (B.L.W.), University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. (A.B.); the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (M.G.M.); the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Control, DanaFarber Cancer Institute, Boston (J.E.G.); and the Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebr. (H.T.L.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Rubin at the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Easton DF, Bishop DT, Ford D, Crockford GP. Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families: the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:678-701. [Medline]
Steichen-Gersdorf E, Gallion HH, Ford D, et al. Familial site-specific ovarian cancer is linked to BRCA1 on 17q12-21. Am J Hum Genet 1994;55:870-875. [Medline]
Merajver SD, Frank TS, Xu J, et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations and loss of the wild-type allele in tumors from families with early onset breast and ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1995;1:539-544. [Abstract]
Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994;266:66-71. [Free Full Text]
Takahashi H, Behbakht K, McGovern PE, et al. Mutation analysis of the BRCA1 gene in ovarian cancers. Cancer Res 1995;55:2998-3002. [Free Full Text]
Benjamin I, Noumoff JS, Carlson JA Jr, Giuntoli RL, Morgan M, Mikuta JJ. Database management for a gynecologic oncology service. Gynecol Oncol 1990;38:431-436. [Medline]
Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.
Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:163-170. [Medline]
Miller BA, Ries LAG, Hankey BF, et al., eds. SEER cancer statistics review, 1973-1990. Bethesda, Md.: National Cancer Institute, 1993. (NIH publication no. 93-2789.)
Ozols RF, Rubin SC, Dembo AJ, Robboy SJ. Epithelial ovarian cancer. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC, eds. Principles and practices of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1992:731-81.
McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1-6. [Free Full Text]
Thigpen T, Brady MF, Omura GA, et al. Age as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience. Cancer 1993;71:606-614. [Medline]
Piver MS, Baker TR, Jishi MF, et al. Familial ovarian cancer: a report of 658 families from the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry 1981-1991. Cancer 1993;71:Suppl:582-588. [Medline]
Buller RE, Anderson B, Connor JP, Robinson R. Familial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1993;51:160-166. [CrossRef][Medline]
Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Montag TW, Nalick RH, Wang HJ. The impact of subspecialty training on the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1992;47:203-209. [CrossRef][Medline]
Porter DE, Cohen BB, Wallace MR, et al. Breast cancer incidence, penetrance and survival in probable carriers of BRCA1 gene mutation in families linked to BRCA1 on chromosome 17q12-21. Br J Surg 1994;81:1512-1515. [Medline]
Eisinger F, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Longy M, et al. Germ line mutation at BRCA1 affects the histoprognostic grade in hereditary breast cancer. Cancer Res 1996;56:471-474. [Free Full Text]
Marcus JN, Watson P, Page DL, et al. Hereditary breast cancer: pathobiology, prognosis, BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene linkage. Cancer 1996;77:697-709. [CrossRef][Medline]
BRCA1 Mutations and Survival in Women with Ovarian Cancer
Cannistra S. A., Whitmore S. E., Burk R. D., Modan B., Johannsson O., Ranstam J., Borg A., Olsson H., Brunet J.-S., Narod S. A., Tonin P., Foulkes W. D., Rubin S. C.
Extract |
Full Text
N Engl J Med 1997;
336:1254-1257, Apr 24, 1997.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Stensheim, H., Moller, B., van Dijk, T., Fossa, S. D.
(2009). Cause-Specific Survival for Women Diagnosed With Cancer During Pregnancy or Lactation: A Registry-Based Cohort Study. JCO
27: 45-51
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tan, D. S.P., Rothermundt, C., Thomas, K., Bancroft, E., Eeles, R., Shanley, S., Ardern-Jones, A., Norman, A., Kaye, S. B., Gore, M. E.
(2008). "BRCAness" Syndrome in Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Control Study Describing the Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Associated With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations. JCO
26: 5530-5536
[Abstract][Full Text]
Soegaard, M., Kjaer, S. K., Cox, M., Wozniak, E., Hogdall, E., Hogdall, C., Blaakaer, J., Jacobs, I. J., Gayther, S. A., Ramus, S. J.
(2008). BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of a Population-Based Series of Ovarian Cancer Cases from Denmark. Clin. Cancer Res.
14: 3761-3767
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kauff, N. D.
(2008). Is It Time to Stratify for BRCA Mutation Status in Therapeutic Trials in Ovarian Cancer?. JCO
26: 9-10
[Full Text]
Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Ben-David, Y., Lubin, F., Friedman, E., Sadetzki, S.
(2008). Effect of BRCA1/2 Mutations on Long-Term Survival of Patients With Invasive Ovarian Cancer: The National Israeli Study of Ovarian Cancer. JCO
26: 20-25
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cannistra, S. A.
(2007). BRCA-1 in Sporadic Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Lessons Learned from the Genetics of Hereditary Disease. Clin. Cancer Res.
13: 7225-7227
[Full Text]
Quinn, J. E., James, C. R., Stewart, G. E., Mulligan, J. M., White, P., Chang, G. K.F., Mullan, P. B., Johnston, P. G., Wilson, R. H., Harkin, D. P.
(2007). BRCA1 mRNA Expression Levels Predict for Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer after Chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res.
13: 7413-7420
[Abstract][Full Text]
Risch, H. A., McLaughlin, J. R., Cole, D. E. C., Rosen, B., Bradley, L., Fan, I., Tang, J., Li, S., Zhang, S., Shaw, P. A., Narod, S. A.
(2006). Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Frequencies and Cancer Penetrances: A Kin-Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
98: 1694-1706
[Abstract][Full Text]
Plevritis, S. K., Kurian, A. W., Sigal, B. M., Daniel, B. L., Ikeda, D. M., Stockdale, F. E., Garber, A. M.
(2006). Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.. JAMA
295: 2374-2384
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sowter, H. M., Ashworth, A.
(2005). BRCA1 and BRCA2 as ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Carcinogenesis
26: 1651-1656
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hartmann, L. C., Lu, K. H., Linette, G. P., Cliby, W. A., Kalli, K. R., Gershenson, D., Bast, R. C., Stec, J., Iartchouk, N., Smith, D. I., Ross, J. S., Hoersch, S., Shridhar, V., Lillie, J., Kaufmann, S. H., Clark, E. A., Damokosh, A. I.
(2005). Gene Expression Profiles Predict Early Relapse in Ovarian Cancer after Platinum-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res.
11: 2149-2155
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cannistra, S. A.
(2004). Cancer of the Ovary. NEJM
351: 2519-2529
[Full Text]
Kirchhoff, T., Kauff, N. D., Mitra, N., Nafa, K., Huang, H., Palmer, C., Gulati, T., Wadsworth, E., Donat, S., Robson, M. E., Ellis, N. A., Offit, K.
(2004). BRCA Mutations and Risk of Prostate Cancer in Ashkenazi Jews. Clin. Cancer Res.
10: 2918-2921
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lakhani, S. R., Manek, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Flanagan, A., Arnout, L., Merrett, S., McGuffog, L., Steele, D., Devilee, P., Klijn, J. G. M., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Radice, P., Pilotti, S., Nevanlinna, H., Butzow, R., Sobol, H., Jacquemier, J., Lyonet, D. S., Neuhausen, S. L., Weber, B., Wagner, T., Winqvist, R., Bignon, Y.-J., Monti, F., Schmitt, F., Lenoir, G., Seitz, S., Hamman, U., Pharoah, P., Lane, G., Ponder, B., Bishop, D. T., Easton, D. F.
(2004). Pathology of Ovarian Cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers. Clin. Cancer Res.
10: 2473-2481
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pautier, P., Morice, P., Delaloge, S., Bressac-de Paillerets, B., Spatz, A.
(2004). Is Systemic Disease in the Coelomic Epithelium Associated With BRCA1 Germline Mutations?. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
96: 488-489
[Full Text]
Armstrong, K., Schwartz, J. S., Randall, T., Rubin, S. C., Weber, B.
(2004). Hormone Replacement Therapy and Life Expectancy After Prophylactic Oophorectomy in Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations: A Decision Analysis. JCO
22: 1045-1054
[Abstract][Full Text]
Modugno, F.
(2004). Ovarian Cancer and Polymorphisms in the Androgen and Progesterone Receptor Genes: A HuGE Review. Am J Epidemiol
159: 319-335
[Abstract][Full Text]
Levine, D. A., Argenta, P. A., Yee, C. J., Marshall, D. S., Olvera, N., Bogomolniy, F., Rahaman, J. A., Robson, M. E., Offit, K., Barakat, R. R., Soslow, R. A., Boyd, J.
(2003). Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinomas Associated With BRCA Mutations. JCO
21: 4222-4227
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dalpe, R., Bouchard, L., Houle, A.-J., Bedard, L.
(2003). Watching the Race to Find the Breast Cancer Genes. Science Technology Human Values
28: 187-216
[Abstract]
Ramus, S. J., Pharoah, P. D. P., Harrington, P., Pye, C., Werness, B., Bobrow, L., Ayhan, A., Wells, D., Fishman, A., Gore, M., DiCioccio, R. A., Piver, M. S., Whittemore, A. S., Ponder, B. A. J., Gayther, S. A.
(2003). BRCA1/2 Mutation Status Influences Somatic Genetic Progression in Inherited and Sporadic Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cases. Cancer Res.
63: 417-423
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pichert, G., Bolliger, B., Buser, K., Pagani, O.
(2003). Evidence-based management options for women at increased breast/ovarian cancer risk. Ann Oncol
14: 9-19
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rathi, A., Virmani, A. K., Schorge, J. O., Elias, K. J., Maruyama, R., Minna, J. D., Mok, S. C., Girard, L., Fishman, D. A., Gazdar, A. F.
(2002). Methylation Profiles of Sporadic Ovarian Tumors and nonmalignant Ovaries from High-Risk Women. Clin. Cancer Res.
8: 3324-3331
[Abstract][Full Text]
Buller, R. E., Shahin, M. S., Geisler, J. P., Zogg, M., De Young, B. R., Davis, C. S.
(2002). Failure of BRCA1 Dysfunction to Alter Ovarian Cancer Survival. Clin. Cancer Res.
8: 1196-1202
[Abstract][Full Text]
van Roosmalen, M. S., Verhoef, L. C.G., Stalmeier, P. F.M., Hoogerbrugge, N., van Daal, W. A.J.
(2002). Decision Analysis of Prophylactic Surgery or Screening for BRCA1 Mutation Carriers: A More Prominent Role For Oophorectomy. JCO
20: 2092-2100
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ben David, Y., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Friedman, E., Beck, B.D., Beller, U., Ben-Baruch, G., Fishman, A., Levavi, H., Lubin, F., Menczer, J., Piura, B., Struewing, J.P., Modan, B.
(2002). Effect of BRCA Mutations on the Length of Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Tumors. JCO
20: 463-466
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sekine, M., Nagata, H., Tsuji, S., Hirai, Y., Fujimoto, S., Hatae, M., Kobayashi, I., Fujii, T., Nagata, I., Ushijima, K., Obata, K., Suzuki, M., Yoshinaga, M., Umesaki, N., Satoh, S., Enomoto, T., Motoyama, S., Tanaka, K.
(2001). Mutational Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and Clinicopathologic Analysis of Ovarian Cancer in 82 Ovarian Cancer Families: Two Common Founder Mutations of BRCA1 in Japanese Population. Clin. Cancer Res.
7: 3144-3150
[Abstract][Full Text]
Peshkin, B. N., DeMarco, T. A., Brogan, B. M., Lerman, C., Isaacs, C.
(2001). BRCA1/2 Testing: Complex Themes in Result Interpretation. JCO
19: 2555-2565
[Abstract][Full Text]
Buller, R. E., Lallas, T. A., Shahin, M. S., Sood, A. K., Hatterman-Zogg, M., Anderson, B., Sorosky, J. I., Kirby, P. A.
(2001). The p53 Mutational Spectrum Associated with BRCA1 Mutant Ovarian Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res.
7: 831-838
[Abstract][Full Text]
McGuire, V., Whittemore, A. S., Norris, R., Oakley-Girvan, I.
(2000). Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with Prior Breast Cancer. Am J Epidemiol
152: 528-532
[Abstract][Full Text]
Eisen, A., Rebbeck, T. R., Wood, W. C., Weber, B. L.
(2000). Prophylactic Surgery in Women With a Hereditary Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancer. JCO
18: 1980-1995
[Abstract][Full Text]
Boyd, J., Sonoda, Y., Federici, M. G., Bogomolniy, F., Rhei, E., Maresco, D. L., Saigo, P. E., Almadrones, L. A., Barakat, R. R., Brown, C. L., Chi, D. S., Curtin, J. P., Poynor, E. A., Hoskins, W. J.
(2000). Clinicopathologic Features of BRCA-Linked and Sporadic Ovarian Cancer. JAMA
283: 2260-2265
[Abstract][Full Text]
Matias-Guiu, X., Bussaglia, E., Catasus, L., Lagarda, H., Gras, E., Machin, P., Prat, J., Lin, W. M., Muller, C. Y.
(2000). Correspondence re: W. M. Lin et al., Loss of Heterozygosity and Mutational Analysis of the PTEN/MMAC1 Gene in Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 2577-2583, 1998.. Clin. Cancer Res.
6: 1598-1600
[Full Text]
Schrag, D., Kuntz, K. M., Garber, J. E., Weeks, J. C.
(2000). Life Expectancy Gains From Cancer Prevention Strategies for Women With Breast Cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations. JAMA
283: 617-624
[Abstract][Full Text]
Offit, K.
(2000). Genetic Prognostic Markers for Colorectal Cancer. NEJM
342: 124-125
[Full Text]
Li, Q., Kopecky, K. J., Mohan, A., Willman, C. L., Appelbaum, F. R., Weick, J. K., Issa, J.-P. J.
(1999). Estrogen Receptor Methylation Is Associated with Improved Survival in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res.
5: 1077-1084
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kasprzak, L., Foulkes, W. D, Shelling, A. N
(1999). Fortnightly review: Hereditary ovarian carcinoma. BMJ
318: 786-789
[Full Text]
Lee, J. S., Wacholder, S., Struewing, J. P., McAdams, M., Pee, D., Brody, L. C., Tucker, M. A., Hartge, P.
(1999). Survival After Breast Cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
91: 259-263
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pharoah, P. D. P., Easton, D. F., Stockton, D. L., Gayther, S., Ponder, B. A. J.
(1999). Survival in Familial, BRCA1-associated, and BRCA2-associated EpithelialOvarian Cancer. Cancer Res.
59: 868-871
[Abstract][Full Text]
Frank, T. S.
(1998). Hereditary Risk of Breast and Ovarian Carcinoma: The Role of the Oncologist. The Oncologist
3: 403-412
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tengs, T. O., Winer, E. P., Paddock, S., Aguilar-Chavez, O., Berry, D. A.
(1998). Testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Breast-Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Genes: A Decision Analysis. Med Decis Making
18: 365-375
[Abstract]
Lynch, H. T., Casey, M. J., Shaw, T. G., Lynch, J. F.
(1998). Hereditary Factors in Gynecologic Cancer. The Oncologist
3: 319-338
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rubin, S. C.
(1998). Chemoprevention of Hereditary Ovarian Cancer. NEJM
339: 469-471
[Full Text]
Kodish, E., Wiesner, G. L., Mehlman, M., Murray, T.
(1998). Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: How to Reconcile the Conflicts. JAMA
279: 179-181
[Full Text]
Grogan, L., Kirsch, I.R.
(1997). Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk Assessment: A Review. The Oncologist
2: 208-222
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schrag, D., Kuntz, K. M., Garber, J. E., Weeks, J. C.
(1997). Decision Analysis -- Effects of Prophylactic Mastectomy and Oophorectomy on Life Expectancy among Women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations. NEJM
336: 1465-1471
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cannistra, S. A., Whitmore, S. E., Burk, R. D., Modan, B., Johannsson, O., Ranstam, J., Borg, A., Olsson, H., Brunet, J.-S., Narod, S. A., Tonin, P., Foulkes, W. D., Rubin, S. C.
(1997). BRCA1 Mutations and Survival in Women with Ovarian Cancer. NEJM
336: 1254-1257
[Full Text]
Stratton, J. F., Gayther, S. A., Russell, P., Dearden, J., Gore, M., Blake, P., Easton, D., Ponder, B. A.J.
(1997). Contribution of BRCA1 Mutations to Ovarian Cancer. NEJM
336: 1125-1130
[Abstract][Full Text]
Olopade, O. I.
(1996). Genetics in Clinical Cancer Care -- The Future is Now. NEJM
335: 1455-1456
[Full Text]