FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Volume 335:1933-1940 December 26, 1996 Number 26 Next

Abstract PDF Letters Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Unsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction is associated with a two-year mortality rate of about 30 percent. We studied whether prophylactic therapy with an implanted cardioverter–defibrillator, as compared with conventional medical therapy, would improve survival in this high-risk group of patients.

Methods Over the course of five years, 196 patients in New York Heart Association functional class I, II, or III with prior myocardial infarction; a left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35; a documented episode of asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia; and inducible, nonsuppressible ventricular tachyarrhythmia on electrophysiologic study were randomly assigned to receive an implanted defibrillator (n = 95) or conventional medical therapy (n = 101). We used a two-sided sequential design with death from any cause as the end point.

Results The base-line characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. During an average follow-up of 27 months, there were 15 deaths in the defibrillator group (11 from cardiac causes) and 39 deaths in the conventional-therapy group (27 from cardiac causes) (hazard ratio for overall mortality, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.82; P = 0.009). There was no evidence that amiodarone, beta-blockers, or any other antiarrhythmic therapy had a significant influence on the observed hazard ratio.

Conclusions In patients with a prior myocardial infarction who are at high risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmia, prophylactic therapy with an implanted defibrillator leads to improved survival as compared with conventional medical therapy.

Methods

Organization of the Trial

The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial enrolled patients from 32 hospital centers (30 in the United States and 2 in Europe). The protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating centers. A data and safety monitoring committee independently reviewed the results at regular intervals throughout the trial. The study was totally supported by a research grant from CPI/Guidant. All investigators agreed in writing in advance of their participation in this study not to hold stock in CPI/Guidant or any other defibrillator-manufacturing company and to abide by the conflict-of-interest standards described by Healy et al.⁹

Recruitment of Patients

Enrollment in the trial began on December 27, 1990. Patients of either sex who were 25 to 80 years of age were eligible for the study if they had had a Q-wave or enzyme-positive myocardial infarction three weeks or more before entry; had had an episode of asymptomatic, unsustained ventricular tachycardia (a run of 3 to 30 ventricular ectopic beats at a rate >120 beats per minute) unrelated to an acute myocardial infarction that was documented by 12-lead, ambulatory, or exercise electrocardiography; had an ejection fraction <0.35, as assessed by angiography, radionuclide scanning, or echocardiography; were in New York Heart Association functional class I, II, or III; and had no indications for coronary-artery bypass grafting or coronary angioplasty on the basis of a cardiac evaluation within the past three months.

Patients were excluded from consideration for enrollment if one or more of the following conditions were present: previous cardiac arrest or ventricular tachycardia causing syncope that was not associated with an acute myocardial infarction; symptomatic hypotension while in a stable rhythm; and myocardial infarction within the past three weeks. Patients who had undergone coronary-artery bypass grafting within the past two months or coronary angioplasty within the past three months were excluded from the study, as were women of childbearing age who were not using medically prescribed contraceptives, patients with advanced cerebrovascular disease, patients with any condition other than cardiac disease that was associated with a reduced likelihood of survival for the duration of the trial, and patients who were participating in other clinical trials.

Eligible patients were referred for electrophysiologic study¹⁰ at the discretion of the patients' attending physicians. Patients qualified for enrollment if sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was reproducibly induced and not suppressed after the intravenous administration of procainamide (or an equivalent intravenous antiarrhythmic agent if the patient had had a previous reaction to procainamide) according to a prespecified protocol, as previously described.¹¹ The enrolling centers did not keep consistent logs of the eligible patients who had no inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmia or in whom the inducible tachycardia was suppressed by procainamide. A total of 253 patients qualified in terms of clinical eligibility and electrophysiologic testing, and 196 of the qualified patients gave informed consent for enrollment. The clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients and the 57 eligible, qualified patients who did not consent to enrollment were similar.

Within 30 days after completing the qualifying electrophysiologic study, the patients were randomly assigned to receive either an implanted defibrillator or conventional medical therapy. The choice of conventional medical therapy, including the decision whether to use antiarrhythmic medications, was left to the patient's attending physician. Antiarrhythmic drugs approved and released by the Food and Drug Administration could be administered to patients in either group. The randomization scheme included stratification according to the interval between the most recent myocardial infarction and enrollment (<6 months or >6 months) and according to center.

Defibrillator Devices and Implantation

Only defibrillators and lead systems approved and released by the Food and Drug Administration were used in the trial. Investigational devices were specifically excluded. CPI/Guidant (St. Paul, Minn.) provided the pulse generators and lead systems. Monophasic (n = 79) and biphasic (n = 11) pulse generators were used.

When the trial began in December 1990, only transthoracic implants were approved for use. Nonthoracotomy transvenous leads were incorporated into the trial after full-market approval of the transvenous lead on August 27, 1993. Once transvenous devices were approved at a given center, a new stratum consisting of patients assigned to transvenous implantable cardioverter–defibrillators or conventional therapy was initiated. Standard techniques were used to implant the defibrillators. Defibrillation testing was carried out during the implantation procedure; every effort was made to achieve defibrillation with a 10-J safety margin.

Data Acquisition and Follow-Up

Definitions for all variables were prespecified in a manual of operations. The qualifying episode of unsustained ventricular tachycardia required electrocardiographic documentation. Base-line electrocardiograms were coded according to the Manhattan criteria.¹²

Patients were seen in the follow-up clinic one month after randomization and every three months thereafter until the trial was stopped. At each follow-up visit, an appropriate clinical evaluation was carried out, medication use was recorded, and the defibrillator was tested. The patients underwent a final evaluation within one month after the completion of the study. The first patient enrolled was followed for 61 months, and the last patient enrolled was followed for less than 1 month. The average duration of follow-up for the 196 enrolled patients was 27 months, with an average of 37 months for the earlier transthoracic stratum (n = 98 patients) and 16 months for the later transvenous stratum (n = 98).

End Points

The primary end point was death from all causes. A two-member end-point subcommittee reviewed information on the causes and circumstances of deaths occurring on or before March 24, 1996. Each death was categorized as due to either a cardiac or a noncardiac cause, and the classification of Hinkle and Thaler¹³ was used to evaluate the suspected mechanism of death from cardiac causes (arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic).

Statistical Analysis

When planned in 1990, the trial was designed to have an 85 percent power to detect a 46 percent reduction in the mortality rate among the defibrillator-treated patients as compared with a postulated two-year mortality rate of 30 percent among the patients randomly assigned to conventional therapy, with a two-sided significance level of 0.05. A triangular sequential design modified for two-sided alternatives¹⁴ (Figure 1) was used, with preset boundaries to permit termination of the trial if the efficacy or inefficacy of implantable cardioverter–defibrillators was established or if there was evidence that there was no difference in outcome between the two treatment groups. The data were analyzed weekly, beginning at the point at which 10 deaths had been reported. The trial was designed to be terminated when the path of the log-rank statistic, measuring imbalance between the survival curves for the two randomized groups, crossed one of the preset termination boundaries (efficacy, inefficacy, or no difference in outcome) of the sequential design.

View larger version (3K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Sequential Monitoring in the Triangular Design. The vertical axis is a measure of the accumulated differences in survival between the two treatments (log-rank statistic). The horizontal axis is the variance of the log-rank statistic and is closely related to the number of deaths. A positive value of the log-rank statistic indicates superiority of the defibrillator relative to conventional medical treatment, values close to zero indicate no difference between treatments, and negative values indicate inferiority of the defibrillator. The upper stopping boundary indicates defibrillator efficacy, whereas the lower boundary indicates defibrillator inefficacy or no difference between treatments. The solid circles reflect weekly analyses, which were initiated after 10 deaths had been recorded (September 13, 1993). The trial was stopped shortly after the path crossed the upper boundary (March 18, 1996), indicating the superiority of the defibrillator over conventional medical therapy in reducing mortality. The trajectory of the path provides evidence of the rejection of the null hypothesis at P = 0.009 (two-sided), with a hazard ratio of 0.46 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.82) in favor of the defibrillator. The path continues upward after the termination of the trial as a result of a lag in reporting three additional deaths that occurred before the stopping date but were uncovered during the close-out procedure (April 19, 1996).

 
The executive committee was unaware of the results of the study throughout the trial. During the course of the trial, the sequential design was revised by the executive committee on two occasions. On September 1, 1993, transvenous leads were introduced into the trial. Since this change could alter the type of patient referred for entry into the trial, the power requirement of the trial was increased from 85 to 90 percent so as not to compromise the credibility of the study. Because of the slow rate of enrollment and before the first patient enrolled had reached the fifth year of the study, it was decided on November 12, 1995, that data on patients would be censored for analytic purposes at five years, with subsequent follow-up information on such patients censored from the ongoing sequential analysis.

Analyses were stratified according to the type of device (transthoracic or transvenous) and followed the intention-to-treat principle. All analyses and potential covariates were specified in advance of the trial's completion. After termination of the trial, sequential-analysis methods were used to calculate a P value and hazard ratio (median unbiased), along with a 95 percent confidence interval based on the P-value function.^14,15 Secondary analyses were performed with the Cox proportional-hazards regression model,¹⁶ with adjustment for relevant covariates. Separate Cox regression analyses were carried out in the transthoracic and transvenous strata to determine whether the efficacy of defibrillators was similar in these two groups. Preselected base-line covariates and prescribed cardiac medications recorded at the one-month clinic visit were evaluated in the Cox model to determine their effect on the risk of death per unit of time in the defibrillator group as compared with that in the conventional-therapy group (the hazard ratio). Survival curves for patients assigned to defibrillator treatment and conventional treatment were determined according to the method of Kaplan and Meier.¹⁷

Results

Study Population and Similarity of Treatment Groups

Of the 196 patients enrolled, 98 were in the transthoracic stratum (45 in the defibrillator group and 53 in the conventional-therapy group) and 98 in the transvenous stratum (50 in the defibrillator group and 48 in the conventional-therapy group). The base-line characteristics of the defibrillator group (n = 95) and the conventional-therapy group (n = 101) are shown in Table 1. The two groups were clinically similar. The distribution of the qualifying Q-wave myocardial infarctions in terms of anterior, inferior, and posterior locations was similar in the two treatment groups. The prevalence of the use of cardiac medications one month after enrollment and at the last contact with the patient is shown in Table 2.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Base-Line Characteristics of 196 Randomized Patients.

 

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Cardiac Medications One Month after Enrollment and at the Last Contact, According to Treatment Group.

 
Sixteen crossovers occurred. Eleven patients in the conventional-therapy group received a defibrillator during the course of the trial because of an adverse drug reaction (n = 2), unexplained syncope (n = 2), episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmia that were of concern to the investigator (n = 6), and aborted cardiac arrest (ventricular fibrillation) (n = 1). Five patients assigned to the defibrillator group never had a defibrillator implanted (one because of a high defibrillation threshold and four because of the patient's preference). Two patients had their defibrillators deactivated during the course of the trial.

The therapy-related adverse events in the two treatment groups are shown in Table 3. There were no operative deaths (death in the first 30 days). There were 1838 scheduled follow-up clinic visits during the course of the trial. The defibrillator-treated patients attended 92 percent of the scheduled visits, and the conventionally treated patients had an attendance record of 86 percent. Three patients were lost to follow-up, two in the conventional-therapy group and one in the defibrillator group.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. Adverse Events Related to Antiarrhythmic Therapy or to the Defibrillator.

 
Termination of the Trial

The efficacy boundary of the sequential design was crossed when 51 deaths were reported, and the study was officially stopped at that time. The final sample path of the sequential trial, which included three additional deaths that occurred before the stopping date but were identified during the close-out procedure, is presented in Figure 1. The trajectory of the sample path indicates the superiority of the defibrillator over conventional medical treatment, with a P value of 0.009 (two-sided).

End-Point Analyses

The five-year overall mortality, the distribution of deaths from cardiac and noncardiac causes, and the cardiac causes of death are presented in Table 4. The hazard ratio comparing the risk of death per unit of time in the defibrillator group with that in the conventional-therapy group was 0.46 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.82). The Kaplan–Meier life-table cumulative-survival curves for the two treatment groups are shown in Figure 2. The two survival curves separate early and remain well separated throughout the five-year study.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 4. Frequency Distribution of Deaths, According to Treatment Group.

 

View larger version (2K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Analysis of the Probability of Survival, According to Assigned Treatment. The difference in survival between the two treatment groups was significant (P = 0.009).

 
The hazard ratio and confidence intervals derived from the Cox model with adjustment for relevant covariates were similar to those obtained with the sequential-analysis design (Table 4). There was no evidence that the effects of the defibrillator differed between patients implanted with transthoracic leads and those who received transvenous leads (ratio of the hazard ratios, 0.86; P = 0.78).

Additional Analyses

Separate Cox regression analyses revealed no evidence that antiarrhythmic medications, including amiodarone and beta-blockers, or other cardiac medications being given one month after enrollment (Table 2) or any of the 11 preselected base-line variables (Table 1) had a meaningful influence on the hazard ratio (P value >0.2 for all interactions). However, the power of the analysis for these interactions is limited, especially in the case of amiodarone, since only two patients in the defibrillator group received the drug. In the conventional-therapy group, overall mortality was slightly higher among those who were receiving amiodarone at one month than among those who were not receiving the drug (36 percent vs. 26 percent).

The cumulative time to the first shock in the defibrillator group is presented in Figure 3. Sixty percent of the patients with an implanted defibrillator had a shock discharge within two years after enrollment. The overall appropriateness of the defibrillator discharges could not be assessed reliably, since only a small number of patients had pulse generators with electrogram storage and these units were implanted late in the clinical trial.

View larger version (2K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier Analysis of the Probability of the Discharge of a First Shock with the Implanted Cardioverter–Defibrillator.

 
We evaluated the consistency of the beneficial effect of defibrillator therapy in each of the two centers with the highest enrollments (42 and 21 patients) and compared the results in the high-enrollment centers with the results in the 30 centers with lower enrollment (a total of 133 patients). The reductions in mortality with the defibrillator were similar among these groups.

Discussion

The implantable defibrillator was introduced into clinical medicine in 1980,¹⁸ and several reports have substantiated the ability of this device to terminate ventricular fibrillation automatically.^{19,20,21,22,23,24} In this trial we found a significant reduction in overall mortality associated with the implantation of a defibrillator in high-risk patients with coronary disease and left ventricular dysfunction, asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia, and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Prescribed medications, including beta-blockers, had no discernible effect on the survival benefit derived from the defibrillator in this population. Patients randomly assigned to receive the defibrillator had a much lower rate of death from primary arrhythmia than patients assigned to conventional therapy (Table 4). It is noteworthy that there were more deaths from nonarrhythmic causes in the conventional-therapy group than in the defibrillator group, possibly reflecting inaccuracy in classifying the cause of death or conceivably related to the higher rate of use of amiodarone in the conventional-therapy group.

When we designed the study, we did not include a comparison group that received no treatment because we thought that such a stipulation would make enrollment extremely difficult in this high-risk, arrhythmia-prone population. We did not prespecify an antiarrhythmic-drug protocol since we anticipated that the safety and efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs would change over the course of the study. The attending physicians were allowed to prescribe antiarrhythmic medications for patients in either treatment group. We anticipated that more amiodarone therapy would be prescribed for patients in the conventional-therapy group than in the defibrillator group, and this was indeed the case. Amiodarone therapy was ultimately discontinued in 46 percent of conventionally treated patients, a rate similar to that observed by others when amiodarone is used prophylactically in high-risk patients.²⁵ The specific reasons for this high rate of discontinuation are unclear but are probably related to physicians' knowledge of the potential of amiodarone to cause adverse effects during long-term administration. Only a small number of patients received sotalol and class I antiarrhythmic agents. Beta-blockers were used more frequently in the defibrillator group, but less than 30 percent of the patients in this group received beta-blockers during the course of the study.

The question is whether these imbalances in antiarrhythmic-medication use between the two groups contributed to the observed results. No evidence was found by Cox regression analyses that an imbalance in antiarrhythmic-medication use in the two treatment groups had a meaningful influence on the observed hazard ratio; in other words, there were no significant interactions between any of the antiarrhythmic medications, including amiodarone and beta-blockers, and the assigned treatment. In a recent double-blind, placebo-controlled study of patients with congestive heart failure, amiodarone did not reduce the incidence of sudden death or prolong survival in patients with chronic coronary heart disease, asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, and impaired ventricular function.²⁵

We believe that the use of electrophysiologic testing enhanced the process of stratification for arrhythmia and helped select a population at particularly high risk that benefited from the defibrillator. The mortality rate in the conventional-therapy group was high (32 percent at two years), but it was consistent with that previously reported for a similar group of patients with inducible or nonsuppressible ventricular tachycardia.⁸ Similarly, the Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure reported a two-year mortality rate of 30 percent in both the amiodarone group and the placebo group; these patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, ejection fractions of 0.40 or less, mild-to-moderate heart failure, and ventricular ectopy.²⁵

A limitation of this study is that we do not know how many patients attending physicians screened to identify patients who were eligible. In addition, the enrolling centers did not keep consistent logs of eligible patients who did not qualify on the basis of the electrophysiologic study. Thus, we do not know the true denominator from which the study population was drawn or the magnitude of selection bias that may have occurred during enrollment.

The triangular, fully sequential design used in this trial is highly effective for conducting a focused trial that minimizes the number of both deaths and patients required for a statistically significant conclusion.¹⁴ In clinical trials using fixed-sample or group-sequential design,²⁶ safety and efficacy monitoring is carried out infrequently or when prespecified numbers or anticipated percentages of end points are accumulated. In contrast, the sequential design permits termination of the trial on early evidence of benefit, of the absence of a difference between groups, or of harm, and the stopping boundaries take into account the multiple data analyses. A limitation associated with the sequential design is that early termination minimizes the amount of information collected, thereby reducing the power for exploratory subgroup analyses.

In the present study, the implanted defibrillator provided effective protection against death in high-risk patients with coronary heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction, spontaneous asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia, and inducible and nonsuppressible ventricular tachyarrhythmia on electrophysiologic testing. Prophylactic defibrillator therapy may reduce mortality among other high-risk patients with cardiac disease who are selected on the basis of different or less restrictive criteria. However, until the results of other randomized trials of defibrillators become available,^27,28 the findings from this investigation should be applied only to the narrowly defined population of patients described in this study.

Supported by a research grant from CPI/Guidant Corporation, St. Paul, Minn.

We are indebted to the patients who participated in this trial; to the attending physicians who referred their patients to this study; and to CPI/Guidant Corporation for its support and sustained commitment, for supplying the defibrillators, and for the independence it provided to the investigators to conduct the study.

^* The other investigators who participated in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial are listed in the Appendix.

Source Information

From the Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine (A.J.M., J.P.D.), the Department of Biostatistics (W.J.H., M.H.), and the Department of Community and Preventive Medicine (M.W.B.), University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, N.Y.; Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles (D.S.C.); Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, Calif. (S.L.H.); University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany (H.K.); St. Francis Hospital–Heart Center, Roslyn, N.Y. (J.H.L.); Eastern Heart Institute, Passaic, N.J. (S.S.); the Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland (A.L.W.); and the Cardiology Unit, University of Chicago, Chicago (D.W.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Moss at the Heart Research Follow-up Program, Box 653, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642.

References

1. Anderson KP, DeCamilla J, Moss AJ. Clinical significance of ventricular tachycardia (3 beats or longer) detected during ambulatory monitoring after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1978;57:890-897. [Free Full Text]
2. Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Kleiger R, Miller JP, Rolnitzky LM, Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group. The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1984;69:250-258. [Free Full Text]
3. Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, Waxman HL, Flores BT, Cassidy DM, Josephson ME. Prognostic factors in nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:1275-1279. [CrossRef][Medline]
4. Ruskin JN, McGovern B, Garan H, DiMarco JP, Kelly E. Antiarrhythmic drugs: a possible cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1983;309:1302-1306. [Medline]
5. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo: the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med 1991;324:781-788. [Abstract]
6. Mason JW. A comparison of seven antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1993;329:452-458. [Free Full Text]
7. Spielman SR, Greenspan AM, Kay HR, et al. Electrophysiologic testing in patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death. I. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and abnormal ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:31-40. [Abstract]
8. Wilber DJ, Olshansky B, Moran JF, Scanlon PJ. Electrophysiological testing and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: use and limitation in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired ventricular function. Circulation 1990;82:350-358. [Free Full Text]
9. Healy B, Campeau L, Gray R, et al. Conflict-of-interest guidelines for a multicenter clinical trial of treatment after coronary-artery bypass-graft surgery. N Engl J Med 1989;320:949-951. [Medline]
10. Morady F, Kou WH, Schmaltz S, et al. Pharmacodynamics of intravenous procainamide as used during acute electropharmacologic testing. Am J Cardiol 1988;61:93-98. [Medline]
11. MADIT Executive Committee. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT): design and clinical protocol. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991;14:920-927. [CrossRef][Medline]
12. Greenberg H, Gillespie J, Dwyer EM Jr, Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group. A new electrocardiographic classification for post-myocardial infarction clinical trials. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:1057-1063. [CrossRef][Medline]
13. Hinkle LE Jr, Thaler HT. Clinical classification of cardiac deaths. Circulation 1982;65:457-464. [Free Full Text]
14. Whitehead J. The design and analysis of sequential clinical trials. 2nd ed. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood, 1992.
15. Brunier H, Whitehead J. PEST: planning and evaluation of sequential trials, version 3.0: operating manual. Reading, England: PEST Project, University of Reading, 1993 (and software).
16. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc [B] 1972;34:187-220.
17. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.
18. Mirowski M, Reid PR, Mower MM, et al. Termination of malignant ventricular arrhythmias with an implanted automatic defibrillator in human beings. N Engl J Med 1980;303:322-324. [Medline]
19. Echt DS, Armstrong K, Schmidt P, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Winkle RA. Clinical experience, complications, and survival in 70 patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. Circulation 1985;71:289-296. [Free Full Text]
20. Kelly PA, Cannom DS, Garan H, et al. The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: efficacy, complications and survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1278-1286. [Abstract]
21. Lehmann MH, Steinman RT, Schuger CD, Jackson K. The automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator as antiarrhythmic treatment modality of choice for survivors of cardiac arrest unrelated to acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:803-805. [CrossRef][Medline]
22. Winkle RA, Mead RH, Ruder MA, et al. Long-term outcome with the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:1353-1361. [Abstract]
23. Fogoros RN, Elson JJ, Bonnet CA. Actuarial incidence and pattern of occurrence of shocks following implantation of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12:1465-1473. [CrossRef][Medline]
24. Levine JH, Mellits ED, Baumgardner RA, et al. Predictors of first discharge and subsequent survival in patients with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation 1991;84:558-566. [Free Full Text]
25. Singh SN, Fletcher RD, Fisher SG, et al. Amiodarone in patients with congestive heart failure and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med 1995;333:77-82. [Free Full Text]
26. Task Force of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. The early termination of clinical trials: causes, consequences, and control: with special reference to trials in the field of arrhythmias and sudden death. Circulation 1994;89:2892-2907. [Free Full Text]
27. Bigger JT Jr. Should defibrillators be implanted in high-risk patients without a previous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia? In: Naccarelli GV, Veltri EP, eds. Implantable cardioverter–defibrillators. Boston: Blackwell Scientific, 1993:284-317.
28. Greene HL. Antiarrhythmic drugs versus implantable defibrillators: the need for a randomized controlled study. Am Heart J 1994;127:1171-1178. [CrossRef][Medline]

The following investigators also participated in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial: S. Sridhar, Affiliated Cardiologists, Phoenix, Ariz.; T. Mattioni, Arizona Heart Institute and Foundation, Phoenix; J. Maloney and B. Wilkoff, Cleveland Clinic Hospital, Cleveland; R. Krol, Eastern Heart Institute, Passaic, N.J.; A. Leon, Emory Clinic, Atlanta; R. Cierpka and H.-J. Trappe, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; S. Kutalek, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia; J. Rottman, Jewish Hospital of St. Louis, St. Louis; T. Guanieri and G. Tomaselli, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore; B. Olshansky, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill.; J. Salerno, Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy; B. Crevey, Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis; C. Pratt and D. Zhu, Methodist Hospital, Houston; M. Pritzker, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis; S. Winters, Morristown Memorial Hospital, Morristown, N.J.; A. Kadish, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago; F. Abi-Samra, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans; B. Halperin, J. Kron, and J. McAnulty, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland; J. Steinberg, Roosevelt–St. Luke's Medical Center, New York; S. Greenberg and D. Hoch, Saint Francis Hospital–Heart Center, Roslyn, N.Y.; J. Gallagher, Sanger Clinic–Carolina Heart Institute, Charlotte, N.C.; J. Ilvento, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Santa Barbara, Calif.; R. Winkle, Sequoia Hospital, Palo Alto, Calif.; M. Lehmann, Sinai Hospital, Detroit; M. Scheinman, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco; R. Myerburg, University of Miami Medical Center, Miami; T. Akiyama, A. Mushlin, and W. Zareba, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, N.Y.; R. Ruffy, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; and E. Platia, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C.; Data and Safety Monitoring Committee — D. Goldblatt, W. Hood, Jr. (chair), D. Oakes, and M. Tanner; End-Point Review Committee — L. Cobb and R. Goldstein (chair); Rochester Coordination and Data Center — M. Andrews, E. Garcia, N. Kellogg, B. MacKecknie, D. Ramsell, and P. Severski; and statistical support — J. Whitehead and S. Chen.

Abstract PDF Letters Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Implantable Defibrillators in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease at High Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmia
Clesham G. J., Petch M. C., Uretsky B. F., Moss A. J., Hall W. J., The MADIT Investigators
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1676-1677, Jun 5, 1997. Correspondence

Prophylactic Use of Implanted Cardiac Defibrillators in Patients at High Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmias after Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Fruchter O., Suliman F.A.E., Bigger J. T., DiMarco J. P., Rottman J. N.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1227-1228, Apr 23, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Saba, S., Volosin, K., Yee, R., Swerdlow, C., Brown, M., for the Dynamic Discrimination Investigators, (2010). Combined Atrial and Ventricular Antitachycardia Pacing as a Novel Method of Rhythm Discrimination: The Dynamic Discrimination Download Study. Circulation 121: 487-497 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Scott, P. A, Roberts, P. R (2010). Role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Postgrad. Med. J. 86: 116-122 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Atary, J. Z., Borleffs, C. J. W., Liem, S. S., Bax, J. J., van der Hoeven, B. L., Bootsma, M., van der Wall, E. E., van Erven, L., Schalij, M. J. (2010). Structured care for patients after acute myocardial infarction: sudden cardiac death prevention--data from the Leiden MISSION! AMI study. Europace 0: eup420v1-eup420 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Adler, E. D., Goldfinger, J. Z., Kalman, J., Park, M. E., Meier, D. E. (2009). Palliative Care in the Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure. Circulation 120: 2597-2606 [Full Text]  
• Kuck, K.-H. (2009). Should Catheter Ablation be the Preferred Therapy for Reducing ICD Shocks?: Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With an Implantable Defibrillator Warrants Catheter Ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2: 713-720 [Full Text]  
• Morin, D. P., Oikarinen, L., Viitasalo, M., Toivonen, L., Nieminen, M. S., Kjeldsen, S. E., Dahlof, B., John, M., Devereux, R. B., Okin, P. M. (2009). QRS duration predicts sudden cardiac death in hypertensive patients undergoing intensive medical therapy: the LIFE study. Eur Heart J 30: 2908-2914 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Packer, D. L., Prutkin, J. M., Hellkamp, A. S., Mitchell, L. B., Bernstein, R. C., Wood, F., Boehmer, J. P., Carlson, M. D., Frantz, R. P., McNulty, S. E., Rogers, J. G., Anderson, J., Johnson, G. W., Walsh, M. N., Poole, J. E., Mark, D. B., Lee, K. L., Bardy, G. H. (2009). Impact of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator, Amiodarone, and Placebo on the Mode of Death in Stable Patients With Heart Failure: Analysis From the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial. Circulation 120: 2170-2176 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mishkin, J. D., Saxonhouse, S. J., Woo, G. W., Burkart, T. A., Miles, W. M., Conti, J. B., Schofield, R. S., Sears, S. F., Aranda, J. M. Jr (2009). Appropriate Evaluation and Treatment of Heart Failure Patients After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Discharge Time to Go Beyond the Initial Shock.. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 1993-2000 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Goldberger, J. J., Passman, R. (2009). Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy After Acute Myocardial Infarction The Results Are Not Shocking.. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 2001-2005 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Borleffs, C. J. W., van Welsenes, G. H., van Bommel, R. J., van der Velde, E. T., Bax, J. J., van Erven, L., Putter, H., van der Bom, J. G., Rosendaal, F. R., Schalij, M. J. (2009). Mortality risk score in primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients with non-ischaemic or ischaemic heart disease. Eur Heart J 0: ehp497v1-ehp497 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gasparini, M., Menozzi, C., Proclemer, A., Landolina, M., Iacopino, S., Carboni, A., Lombardo, E., Regoli, F., Biffi, M., Burrone, V., Denaro, A., Boriani, G. (2009). A simplified biventricular defibrillator with fixed long detection intervals reduces implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy implanted for primary prevention: the RELEVANT [Role of long dEtection window programming in patients with LEft VentriculAr dysfunction, Non-ischemic eTiology in primary prevention treated with a biventricular ICD] study. Eur Heart J 30: 2758-2767 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Breithardt, G. (2009). MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy): cardiac resynchronization therapy towards early management of heart failure. Eur Heart J 30: 2551-2553 [Full Text]  
• Holcomb, M. R., Woods, M. C., Uzelac, I., Wikswo, J. P., Gilligan, J. M., Sidorov, V. Y. (2009). The Potential of Dual Camera Systems for Multimodal Imaging of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Metabolism. Exp Biol Med 234: 1355-1373 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kanoupakis, E. M., Manios, E. G., Vardas, P. E. (2009). Predicting future shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: the role of biomarkers. Europace 11: 1434-1439 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Borleffs, C. J. W., Scherptong, R. W.C., Man, S.-C., van Welsenes, G. H., Bax, J. J., van Erven, L., Swenne, C. A., Schalij, M. J. (2009). Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: Clinical Application of the ECG-Derived QRS-T Angle. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2: 548-554 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Moss, A. J., Hall, W. J., Cannom, D. S., Klein, H., Brown, M. W., Daubert, J. P., Estes, N.A. M. III, Foster, E., Greenberg, H., Higgins, S. L., Pfeffer, M. A., Solomon, S. D., Wilber, D., Zareba, W., the MADIT-CRT Trial Investigators, (2009). Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for the Prevention of Heart-Failure Events. NEJM 361: 1329-1338 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kraaier, K., Verhorst, P. M.J., van der Palen, J., van Dessel, P. F.H.M., Wilde, A. A.M., Scholten, M. F. (2009). Microvolt T-wave alternans during exercise and pacing are not comparable. Europace 11: 1375-1380 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ghanbari, H., Dalloul, G., Hasan, R., Daccarett, M., Saba, S., David, S., Machado, C. (2009). Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Women With Advanced Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arch Intern Med 169: 1500-1506 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Myerburg, R. J., Reddy, V., Castellanos, A. (2009). Indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators based on evidence and judgment.. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 747-763 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tereshchenko, L. G., Faddis, M. N., Fetics, B. J., Zelik, K. E., Efimov, I. R., Berger, R. D. (2009). Transient local injury current in right ventricular electrogram after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock predicts heart failure progression.. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 822-828 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Knecht, S., Sacher, F., Wright, M., Hocini, M., Nogami, A., Arentz, T., Petit, B., Franck, R., De Chillou, C., Lamaison, D., Farre, J., Lavergne, T., Verbeet, T., Nault, I., Matsuo, S., Leroux, L., Weerasooriya, R., Cauchemez, B., Lellouche, N., Derval, N., Narayan, S. M., Jais, P., Clementy, J., Haissaguerre, M. (2009). Long-term follow-up of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation ablation: a multicenter study.. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 522-528 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Genovesi, S., Valsecchi, M. G., Rossi, E., Pogliani, D., Acquistapace, I., De Cristofaro, V., Stella, A., Vincenti, A. (2009). Sudden death and associated factors in a historical cohort of chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24: 2529-2536 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Borleffs, C. J. W., van Erven, L., van Bommel, R. J., van der Velde, E. T., van der Wall, E. E., Bax, J. J., Rosendaal, F. R., Schalij, M. J. (2009). Risk of Failure of Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2: 411-416 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Task force members, , Vijgen, J., Botto, G., Camm, J., Hoijer, C.-J., Jung, W., Le Heuzey, J.-Y., Lubinski, A., Norekval, T. M., Santomauro, M., Schalij, M., Schmid, J.-P., Vardas, P. (2009). Consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: updated recommendations for driving by patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Europace 11: 1097-1107 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zaman, S., Sivagangabalan, G., Narayan, A., Thiagalingam, A., Ross, D. L., Kovoor, P. (2009). Outcomes of Early Risk Stratification and Targeted Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation 120: 194-200 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Estes, N. A. M. III (2009). The Challenge of Predicting and Preventing Sudden Cardiac Death Immediately After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 120: 185-187 [Full Text]  
• de Bie, M. K., van Dam, B., Gaasbeek, A., van Buren, M., van Erven, L., Bax, J. J., Schalij, M. J., Rabelink, T. J., Jukema, J. W. (2009). The current status of interventions aiming at reducing sudden cardiac death in dialysis patients. Eur Heart J 30: 1559-1564 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• LaPointe, N. M A., Stafford, J. A, Pappas, P. A, Al-Khatib, S. M, Anstrom, K. J (2009). Use of {beta}-Blockers in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 43: 1189-1196 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cevik, C., Perez-Verdia, A., Nugent, K. (2009). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and their role in heart failure progression. Europace 11: 710-715 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cowie, M. R., Marshall, D., Drummond, M., Ferko, N., Maschio, M., Ekman, M., de Roy, L., Heidbuchel, H., Verboven, Y., Braunschweig, F., Linde, C., Boriani, G. (2009). Lifetime cost-effectiveness of prophylactic implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator in patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function: results of Markov modelling in a European population. Europace 11: 716-726 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Meine, M., Smith, T., Hauer, R. N.W. (2009). The economical challenge in the treatment of chronic heart failure: is primary prophylactic ICD therapy cost-effective in Europe?. Europace 11: 689-691 [Full Text]  
• Tsai, V. W., Cooper, J., Garan, H., Natale, A., Ptaszek, L. M., Ellinor, P. T., Hickey, K., Downey, R., Zei, P., Hsia, H., Wang, P., Hunt, S., Haddad, F., Al-Ahmad, A. (2009). The Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Heart Transplant Recipients: Results From a Multicenter Registry. Circ Heart Fail 2: 197-201 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roes, S. D., Borleffs, C. J. W., van der Geest, R. J., Westenberg, J. J.M., Marsan, N. A., Kaandorp, T. A.M., Reiber, J. H.C., Zeppenfeld, K., Lamb, H. J., de Roos, A., Schalij, M. J., Bax, J. J. (2009). Infarct Tissue Heterogeneity Assessed With Contrast-Enhanced MRI Predicts Spontaneous Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2: 183-190 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tomlinson, D. R., Bashir, Y., Betts, T. R., Rajappan, K. (2009). Accuracy of manual QRS duration assessment: its importance in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Europace 11: 638-642 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Curtis, J. P., Luebbert, J. J., Wang, Y., Rathore, S. S., Chen, J., Heidenreich, P. A., Hammill, S. C., Lampert, R. I., Krumholz, H. M. (2009). Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator. JAMA 301: 1661-1670 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Santini, M., Russo, M., Botto, G., Lunati, M., Proclemer, A., Schmidt, B., Erdogan, A., Helmling, E., Rauhe, W., Desaga, M., Santi, E., Messier, M., Boriani, G. (2009). Clinical and arrhythmic outcomes after implantation of a defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with post-myocardial infarction cardiomyopathy: The Survey to Evaluate Arrhythmia Rate in High-risk MI patients (SEARCH-MI). Europace 11: 476-482 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Valk, S., Jordaens, L. (2009). Primary prevention: a necessity after myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction. Europace 11: 407-408 [Full Text]  
• Wilkoff, B. L., Kudenchuk, P. J., Buxton, A. E., Sharma, A., Cook, J. R., Bhandari, A. K., Biehl, M., Tomassoni, G., Leonen, A., Klevan, L. R., Hallstrom, A. P., for the DAVID II Investigators, (2009). The DAVID (Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator) II trial.. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 872-880 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Peterson, P. N., Daugherty, S. L., Wang, Y., Vidaillet, H. J., Heidenreich, P. A., Curtis, J. P., Masoudi, F. A., on behalf of the National Cardiovascular Data Regi, (2009). Gender Differences in Procedure-Related Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy. Circulation 119: 1078-1084 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bauer, A., Barthel, P., Schneider, R., Ulm, K., Muller, A., Joeinig, A., Stich, R., Kiviniemi, A., Hnatkova, K., Huikuri, H., Schomig, A., Malik, M., Schmidt, G. (2009). Improved Stratification of Autonomic Regulation for risk prediction in post-infarction patients with preserved left ventricular function (ISAR-Risk). Eur Heart J 30: 576-583 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stone, M. E., Apinis, A. (2009). Current Perioperative Management of the Patient With a Cardiac Rhythm Management Device. SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 13: 31-43 [Abstract]  
• Costantini, O., Hohnloser, S. H., Kirk, M. M., Lerman, B. B., Baker, J. H. II, Sethuraman, B., Dettmer, M. M., Rosenbaum, D. S., for the ABCD Trial Investigators, (2009). The ABCD (Alternans Before Cardioverter Defibrillator) Trial: strategies using T-wave alternans to improve efficiency of sudden cardiac death prevention.. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 471-479 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Feld, G. K., Clopton, P. (2009). Comparability of noninvasive microvolt T-wave alternans versus invasive ventricular programmed stimulation to guide implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients at risk of sudden death.. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 480-482 [Full Text]  
• Nazarian, S., Bluemke, D. A., Halperin, H. R. (2009). Applications of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Electrophysiology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2: 63-71 [Full Text]  
• Milliez, P., Messaoudi, S., Nehme, J., Rodriguez, C., Samuel, J.-L., Delcayre, C. (2009). Beneficial effects of delayed ivabradine treatment on cardiac anatomical and electrical remodeling in rat severe chronic heart failure. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 296: H435-H441 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Donahue, J. K. (2009). Novel Strategy to Reduce Sudden-Death Risk in the Healing Phase After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 119: 6-8 [Full Text]  
• Roth, J. A. (2009). Tachycardias: Diagnosis and Management. ACCP Crit Care Med Brd Rev 20: 93-116 [Full Text]  
• Hollenberg, S. M. (2009). Heart Failure and Cardiac Pulmonary Edema. ACCP Crit Care Med Brd Rev 20: 117-128 [Full Text]  
• Rosenberg, J., Schou, M., Gustafsson, F., Badskjaer, J., Hildebrandt, P. (2009). Prognostic threshold levels of NT-proBNP testing in primary care. Eur Heart J 30: 66-73 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kelley, A. S., Mehta, S. S., Carrington Reid, M. (2009). Management of Patients with ICDs at the End of Life (EOL): A Qualitative Study. AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 25: 440-446 [Abstract]  
• Chan, P. S., Nallamothu, B. K., Spertus, J. A., Masoudi, F. A., Bartone, C., Kereiakes, D. J., Chow, T. (2009). Impact of Age and Medical Comorbidity on the Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2: 16-24 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eckardt, L., Breithardt, G&#x.;n., Hohnloser, S. (2009). CHAPTER 30 Ventricular Tachycardia and Sudden Cardiac Death. ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 2: med-9780199566990-chapter-med-9780199566990-chapter [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Katritsis, D. G., Webb-Peploe, M. M. (2009). CHAPTER 38 Occupational and Regulatory Aspects of Heart Disease. ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 2: med-9780199566990-chapter-med-9780199566990-chapter [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Swedberg, K., Cleland, J., Cowie, M. R., Nieminen, M., Priori, S. G., Tavazzi, L., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Alonso-Pulpon, L., Camm, J., Dickstein, K., Drexler, H., Filippatos, G., Linde, C., Lopez-Sendon, J., Santini, M., Zannad, F. (2008). Successful treatment of heart failure with devices requires collaboration. Eur J Heart Fail 10: 1229-1235 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Myerburg, R. J. (2008). Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators after Myocardial Infarction. NEJM 359: 2245-2253 [Full Text]  
• Chow, T., Kereiakes, D. J., Onufer, J., Woelfel, A., Gursoy, S., Peterson, B. J., Brown, M. L., Pu, W., Benditt, D. G., on behalf of the MASTER Trial Investigators, (2008). Does Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Testing Predict Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Prophylactic Defibrillators?: The MASTER (Microvolt T Wave Alternans Testing for Risk Stratification of Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52: 1607-1615 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gold, M. R., Ip, J. H., Costantini, O., Poole, J. E., McNulty, S., Mark, D. B., Lee, K. L., Bardy, G. H. (2008). Role of Microvolt T-Wave Alternans in Assessment of Arrhythmia Vulnerability Among Patients With Heart Failure and Systolic Dysfunction: Primary Results From the T-Wave Alternans Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial Substudy. Circulation 118: 2022-2028 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Go, A. S., Magid, D. J., Wells, B., Sung, S. H., Cassidy-Bushrow, A. E., Greenlee, R. T., Langer, R. D., Lieu, T. A., Margolis, K. L., Masoudi, F. A., McNeal, C. J., Murata, G. H., Newton, K. M., Novotny, R., Reynolds, K., Roblin, D. W., Smith, D. H., Vupputuri, S., White, R. E., Olson, J., Rumsfeld, J. S., Gurwitz, J. H. (2008). The Cardiovascular Research Network: A New Paradigm for Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Research. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 1: 138-147 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Piccini, J. P., Horton, J. R., Shaw, L. K., Al-Khatib, S. M., Lee, K. L., Iskandrian, A. E., Borges-Neto, S. (2008). Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Defects Are Associated With an Increased Risk of All-Cause Death, Cardiovascular Death, and Sudden Cardiac Death. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 1: 180-188 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tzeis, S., Andrikopoulos, G., Kolb, C., Vardas, P. E. (2008). Tools and strategies for the reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. Europace 10: 1256-1265 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Biffi, M., Ziacchi, M., Bertini, M., Sangiorgi, D., Corsini, D., Martignani, C., Diemberger, I., Boriani, G. (2008). Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: implications for clinical practice and health care systems. Europace 10: 1288-1295 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pellegrini, C. N., Lee, K., Olgin, J. E., Turakhia, M. P., Tseng, Z. H., Lee, R., Badhwar, N., Lee, B., Varosy, P. D. (2008). Impact of advanced age on survival in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Europace 10: 1296-1301 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Triedman, J. K. (2008). Should patients with congenital heart disease and a systemic ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% undergo prophylactic implantation of an ICD?: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation Guidelines Based Solely on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Do Not Apply to Adults With Congenital Heart Disease. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 1: 307-316 [Full Text]  
• Authors/Task Force Members, , Dickstein, K., Cohen-Solal, A., Filippatos, G., McMurray, J. J.V., Ponikowski, P., Poole-Wilson, P. A., Stromberg, A., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Atar, D., Hoes, A. W., Keren, A., Mebazaa, A., Nieminen, M., Priori, S. G., Swedberg, K., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), , Vahanian, A., Camm, J., De Caterina, R., Dean, V., Dickstein, K., Filippatos, G., Funck-Brentano, C., Hellemans, I., Kristensen, S. D., McGregor, K., Sechtem, U., Silber, S., Tendera, M., Widimsky, P., Zamorano, J. L., Document Reviewers, , Tendera, M., Auricchio, A., Bax, J., Bohm, M., Corra, U., della Bella, P., Elliott, P. M., Follath, F., Gheorghiade, M., Hasin, Y., Hernborg, A., Jaarsma, T., Komajda, M., Kornowski, R., Piepoli, M., Prendergast, B., Tavazzi, L., Vachiery, J.-L., Verheugt, F. W. A., Zamorano, J. L., Zannad, F. (2008). ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur Heart J 29: 2388-2442 [Full Text]  
• Dickstein, K., Cohen-Solal, A., Filippatos, G., McMurray, J. J.V., Ponikowski, P., Poole-Wilson, P. A., Stromberg, A., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Atar, D., Hoes, A. W., Keren, A., Mebazaa, A., Nieminen, M., Priori, S. G., Swedberg, K. (2008). ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur J Heart Fail 10: 933-989 [Full Text]  
• de Sousa, M. R., Morillo, C. A., Rabelo, F. T., Filho, A. M. N., Ribeiro, A. L.P. (2008). Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia as a predictor of sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: A meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 10: 1007-1014 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sherazi, S., Daubert, J. P., Block, R. C., Jeevanantham, V., Abdel-Gadir, K., DiSalle, M. R., Haley, J. M., Shah, A. H. (2008). Physicians' Preferences and Attitudes About End-of-Life Care in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator. Mayo Clin Proc. 83: 1139-1141 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tung, R., Zimetbaum, P., Josephson, M. E. (2008). A Critical Appraisal of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy for the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. J Am Coll Cardiol 52: 1111-1121 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Goldberger, J. J., Cain, M. E., Hohnloser, S. H., Kadish, A. H., Knight, B. P., Lauer, M. S., Maron, B. J., Page, R. L., Passman, R. S., Siscovick, D., Stevenson, W. G., Zipes, D. P. (2008). American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Statement on Noninvasive Risk Stratification Techniques for Identifying Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 52: 1179-1199 [Full Text]  
• Goldberger, J. J., Cain, M. E., Hohnloser, S. H., Kadish, A. H., Knight, B. P., Lauer, M. S., Maron, B. J., Page, R. L., Passman, R. S., Siscovick, D., Stevenson, W. G., Zipes, D. P. (2008). American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Statement on Noninvasive Risk Stratification Techniques for Identifying Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 118: 1497-1518 [Full Text]  
• Dorian, P., Al-Khalidi, H. R., Hohnloser, S. H., Brum, J. M., Dunnmon, P. M., Pratt, C. M., Holroyde, M. J., Kowey, P., on behalf of the SHIELD (SHock Inhibition Evaluati, (2008). Azimilide Reduces Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52: 1076-1083 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mark, D. B., Anstrom, K. J., Sun, J. L., Clapp-Channing, N. E., Tsiatis, A. A., Davidson-Ray, L., Lee, K. L., Bardy, G. H., the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial In, (2008). Quality of Life with Defibrillator Therapy or Amiodarone in Heart Failure. NEJM 359: 999-1008 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ding, L., Hua, W., Niu, H., Chen, K., Zhang, S. (2008). Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death using implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Europace 10: 1034-1041 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mukaddirov, M., Demaria, R. G., Perrault, L. P., Frapier, J.-M., Albat, B. (2008). Reconstructive surgery of postinfarction left ventricular aneurysms: techniques and unsolved problems.. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 34: 256-261 [Abstract] [Full Text]