The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 336:1689-1697 June 12, 1997 Number 24
NextNext

Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade and Low-Dose Heparin during Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
The EPILOG Investigators

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Blockade of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with abciximab (a monoclonal-antibody Fab fragment directed against the receptor) has been shown to diminish ischemic complications among patients undergoing high-risk coronary angioplasty or atherectomy but increases bleeding complications. The widespread applicability of this treatment is unknown, particularly in view of the observed risk of hemorrhage.

Methods In a prospective, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients undergoing urgent or elective percutaneous coronary revascularization at 69 centers to receive abciximab with standard-dose, weight-adjusted heparin (initial bolus of 100 U per kilogram of body weight); abciximab with low-dose, weight-adjusted heparin (initial bolus of 70 U per kilogram); or placebo with standard-dose, weight-adjusted heparin. The primary efficacy end point was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization within 30 days of randomization.

Results The trial was terminated at the first interim analysis, with 2792 of the planned 4800 patients enrolled. At 30 days, the composite event rate was 11.7 percent in the group assigned to placebo with standard-dose heparin; 5.2 percent in the group assigned to abciximab with low-dose heparin (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.60; P<0.001); and 5.4 percent in the group assigned to abciximab with standard-dose heparin (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.63; P<0.001). There were no significant differences among the groups in the risk of major bleeding, although minor bleeding was more frequent among patients receiving abciximab with standard-dose heparin.

Conclusions Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with abciximab, together with low-dose, weight-adjusted heparin, markedly reduces the risk of acute ischemic complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization, without increasing the risk of hemorrhage.


New strategies for preventing ischemic complications during percutaneous coronary revascularization have focused on the platelet surface-membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor.1 In a previous large-scale trial (Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications, or EPIC), blockade of this receptor by abciximab (c7E3 Fab, ReoPro, Centocor, Malvern, Pa.), a human–murine chimeric antibody Fab fragment, was shown to reduce the incidence of acute ischemic events by 35 percent among patients undergoing "high-risk" percutaneous coronary revascularization2 but was accompanied by a doubling of the incidence of major bleeding complications. Important questions were thus raised regarding the balance between risk and benefit with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade during coronary intervention, particularly among patients not considered to be at high risk for ischemic complications. The concurrent administration of high doses of heparin, however, may have potentiated the hemorrhagic toxicity of abciximab observed in the EPIC trial.2,3 A pilot study suggested that the blood loss associated with abciximab might be attenuated by using lower doses of heparin, as well as by early removal of the vascular sheath to eliminate the need for the postprocedural infusion of heparin.4

The objectives of the present trial were first, to determine whether the clinical benefits of abciximab therapy could be extended to all patients undergoing coronary intervention, regardless of their risk of ischemic complications, and second, to evaluate whether the incidence of hemorrhagic complications associated with this agent could be reduced without loss of efficacy by adjusting the heparin dose for body weight or reducing it.

Methods

Study Population

The Evaluation in PTCA to Improve Long-Term Outcome with Abciximab GP IIb/IIIa Blockade (EPILOG) study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 69 clinical sites in the United States and Canada. Patients undergoing elective or urgent percutaneous coronary revascularization with a device approved by the Food and Drug Administration were eligible for inclusion if they were over 21 years old and had a target lesion in which there was stenosis of at least 60 percent of the diameter of the vessel. Because the previous trial had suggested that abciximab provided substantial clinical benefit among patients with acute ischemic syndromes,2 patients who had either acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina with associated electrocardiographic changes during the previous 24 hours were excluded. Other exclusion criteria were planned stent implantation or rotational atherectomy; percutaneous coronary intervention performed within the previous three months; a left-main-coronary-artery stenosis of more than 50 percent not protected by collateral vessels; concurrent warfarin therapy or a base-line prothrombin time more than 1.2 times the control value; cerebrovascular accident within the previous two years or a residual neurologic deficit; intracranial neoplasm, aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation; history of vasculitis, known hemorrhagic diathesis, or active internal bleeding; hypertension, with a systolic blood pressure of more than 180 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of more than 100 mm Hg; and major surgery, gastrointestinal bleeding, or genitourinary bleeding within the previous six weeks. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each clinical site, and all patients gave informed consent.

Study Protocol

Patients were given 325 mg of aspirin orally two hours before the percutaneous revascularization procedure and daily thereafter. Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion by means of a central telephone hot line to one of three treatment groups: placebo with standard-dose, weight-adjusted heparin; abciximab with standard-dose, weight-adjusted heparin; or abciximab with low-dose, weight-adjusted heparin. For those receiving abciximab, a bolus of 0.25 mg per kilogram of body weight was administered 10 to 60 minutes before inflation of the balloon or activation of the device, followed by an infusion of 0.125 µg per kilogram per minute (maximum, 10 µg per minute) for 12 hours. The standard-dose, weight-adjusted heparin regimen consisted of an initial bolus of 100 U of heparin per kilogram (maximum, 10,000 U) before the interventional procedure, with additional weight-adjusted boluses calculated according to an algorithm intended to achieve and maintain an activated clotting time of at least 300 seconds. The group assigned to low-dose, weight-adjusted heparin received an initial bolus of 70 U of heparin per kilogram (maximum, 7000 U), with additional boluses as necessary to achieve and maintain an activated clotting time of at least 200 seconds. To preserve the blinding of all investigators and personnel involved in patient care, a heparin coordinator at each clinical site performed all measurements of activated clotting time and directed the administration of heparin. The protocol recommended that heparin be discontinued immediately after the interventional procedure and that vascular sheaths be removed when the activated clotting time was 175 seconds or less (usually 2 to 6 hours later).

Implantation of stents was discouraged and was reserved as a means of maintaining patency after manifest or threatened abrupt closure. Specific guidelines for sites of vascular access stressed the early removal of sheaths, avoidance of routine placement of venous sheaths, selective anterior-arterial-wall puncture, compression of the femoral access site for 30 minutes to achieve hemostasis after removal of the vascular sheath, and strict bed rest and immobilization of limbs for 6 to 8 hours after the cessation of abciximab treatment and removal of sheaths. Algorithms were provided for the management of uncontrolled bleeding, urgent coronary-artery bypass surgery, and thrombocytopenia, and it was recommended that red-cell transfusions be administered according to the clinical guidelines of the American College of Physicians.5

Study End Points

The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction or reinfarction, or severe myocardial ischemia requiring urgent coronary bypass surgery or repeated percutaneous coronary revascularization within 30 days after randomization. A second efficacy end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or coronary bypass surgery or repeated percutaneous revascularization (urgent or nonurgent) within six months after randomization. End-point classifications of a clinical-events committee, blinded to study-group assignment, were used for the final analyses.

An end-point in-hospital myocardial infarction was defined by one of two criteria: new, clinically significant Q waves in two or more contiguous electrocardiographic leads; or elevation in creatine kinase or its MB isoenzyme to at least three times the upper limit of normal, representing an increase of at least 50 percent over the previous trough level, in two samples collected at different times (enzyme analysis was conducted on blood obtained before and 2 hours after the initiation of treatment with the study agent, every 6 hours up to 24 hours, and then every 8 hours up to 48 hours or discharge). After discharge from the hospital, myocardial infarction was defined by the occurrence of Q waves or the elevation of creatine kinase or its MB isoenzyme to more than twice the upper limit of normal. The MB isoenzyme value was used if it was available; if not, the total creatine kinase value was used.

Bleeding events were classified as major or minor according to the criteria used by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.6 Hemoglobin was measured before and 12 and 36 hours after initiation of the study agent (or at discharge). To account for the influence of red-cell transfusions on measured hemoglobin values, the estimated decreases in hemoglobin were adjusted according to the technique suggested by Landefeld et al.7 Platelet counts were obtained before and 1/2, 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after administration of the study agent (or at discharge). All suspected occurrences of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage were adjudicated by an independent neurologist.

Data Management and Statistical Analysis

Data were collected on case-report forms by study coordinators at the clinical sites and verified with medical records by study monitors. The investigators, study coordinators, and trial sponsor (Centocor) remained blinded to the treatment assignments until after the data were entered and reviewed by the clinical-events committee and the analysis plan was made final.

The differences among patients with regard to efficacy and bleeding variables were examined according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Hazard ratios were based on time-to-event analyses using the Cox proportional-hazards model. The P values for efficacy end points were derived from the log-rank statistic, and the P values for dichotomous safety end points were calculated with the Pearson chi-square statistic or Fisher's exact test.

An interim analysis was performed to review efficacy and safety data for the first 1500 patients, in order to ensure that the low-dose heparin regimen did not result in a higher rate of ischemic complications than placebo. The primary end point of this interim analysis was the occurrence of death or myocardial infarction within 30 days after randomization. An unbalanced stopping rule was applied that favored termination of the trial for reasons of safety rather than efficacy, requiring a one-sided P value of <0.025 if an abciximab group had a higher event rate than the placebo group, but a one-sided P value of <0.0005 if an abciximab group had a lower event rate than the placebo group.

The goal of the prespecified final analyses was to test whether either abciximab group had a lower rate of the 30-day or 6-month composite end point than the placebo group. Simulations were performed for the computation of the type I error. We controlled for type I error for each end point by requiring consistent effects for the combined abciximab groups as compared with the placebo group; a screening test was required to show significance at a level of P = 0.0287 for a given end point before pairwise testing could be performed. Both screening and pairwise tests were one-sided. With this strategy, the total probability of concluding that either abciximab group fared better than the placebo group with respect to any one or more of the 30-day, 6-month, or interim-analysis end points was less than 5 percent if, in fact, no difference existed. A sample of 4800 patients was chosen to provide an 80 percent power to detect a 35 percent reduction in the rate of the 30-day primary end point, assuming a base-line (placebo-group) event rate of 7 percent.

Results

Enrollment began on February 27, 1995. End-point and safety data for the first 1500 patients were reviewed by the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee on December 11, 1995. This interim analysis revealed that the incidence of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days was 8.2 percent for patients in the placebo group, as compared with 2.6 percent for patients treated with abciximab and low-dose heparin, and 3.6 percent for patients treated with abciximab and standard-dose heparin (P<0.001). Since the prespecified stopping rule was met, the trial was terminated on December 14, 1995, with a total of 2792 of the planned 4800 patients enrolled.

There were no significant differences in base-line characteristics among patients in the three treatment groups (Table 1). Notably, despite the exclusion of patients with unstable angina accompanied by reversible electrocardiographic changes within the previous 24 hours, 48 percent of the patients enrolled met other clinical criteria for unstable angina.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Base-Line Demographic, Clinical, and Procedural Characteristics of the Study Patients.

 
The incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization for severe myocardial ischemia at 30 days (Figure 1) was 11.7 percent in the placebo group, 5.2 percent in the group assigned to abciximab with low-dose heparin (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.60; P<0.001), and 5.4 percent in the group assigned to abciximab with standard-dose heparin (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.63; P<0.001). Each of the components of the composite end point was similarly reduced (Table 2). The treatment effect of abciximab with either heparin regimen was homogeneous among all patient groups (Figure 2). Proportional-hazards regression using the base-line variables in Table 1 identified no significant interactions between the characteristics of the patients and the effect of abciximab treatment.


View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier Estimate of the Probability of the Primary Efficacy End-Point Events (Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Urgent Repeated Revascularization) within 30 Days after Randomization, According to Treatment Assignment.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Components of the 30-Day Primary Composite Efficacy End Point.

 

View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Hazard Ratios and 95 Percent Confidence Intervals for the 30-Day Primary Efficacy End Point in Prespecified Subgroups Defined According to Risk Stratum, Indication for Revascularization, Weight, Age, and Sex.

LD denotes low-dose, weight-adjusted heparin; SD standard-dose, weight-adjusted heparin; and MI myocardial infarction. The high-risk stratum was defined at the time of randomization as the patients with myocardial infarction within the previous seven days or adverse lesion morphology on angiography2; all other patients were considered to be at low risk. Hazard ratios are for the abciximab groups as compared with the placebo group.

 
The rates of hemorrhagic complications during hospitalization are summarized in Table 3. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in the risk of major bleeding. Patients receiving abciximab with standard-dose heparin, but not those receiving abciximab with low-dose heparin, had significantly more minor bleeding events than patients receiving placebo. The rate of red-cell transfusions was significantly lower among patients receiving abciximab with low-dose heparin than among those receiving placebo. One patient in each abciximab group, but none in the placebo group, had a hemorrhagic stroke; two patients receiving abciximab with standard-dose heparin had other intracranial bleeding or a nonhemorrhagic stroke. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count, <50,000 per cubic millimeter) occurred in four patients in the placebo group (0.4 percent), four patients assigned to abciximab and low-dose heparin (0.4 percent), and eight patients in the group assigned to abciximab and standard-dose heparin (0.9 percent, P = 0.260).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Bleeding End Points.

 
At six months, the cumulative incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or repeated revascularization was 25.8 percent in the placebo group, 22.8 percent in the group assigned to abciximab with low-dose heparin (11.7 percent risk reduction, P = 0.07), and 22.3 percent in the group assigned to abciximab with standard-dose heparin (13.7 percent risk reduction, P = 0.04). The treatment effect observed at 30 days for the reduction in acute ischemic complications (death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization) was maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up period; thus, the attenuation of risk reduction observed for the 6-month composite end point was due to the lack of effect of abciximab on the incidence of nonurgent repeated revascularization procedures (Table 4). There were no significant differences in the incidence of target-vessel revascularization among the three treatment groups.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Components of the Six-Month Composite Efficacy End Point.

 
Discussion

The EPIC study demonstrated the efficacy of abciximab in reducing complications among patients at high risk during coronary intervention because of unstable ischemic syndromes or unfavorable lesion morphology on angiography.2 However, important questions were raised regarding whether such a strategy should be used for all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization, particularly in view of the increased risk of hemorrhage associated with the use of abciximab. In the current trial, abciximab administered with a reduced-dose, weight-adjusted heparin regimen decreased the rate of the composite 30-day end point by 56 percent across a broad spectrum of patients without an attendant increase in the risk of major bleeding complications.

A noteworthy consistency of treatment effect was observed for each of the components of the composite end point, as well as for the magnitude of benefit among the various subgroups of patients. The reduction in acute ischemic complications after abciximab treatment was durable over six months of follow-up, although incremental efficacy in reducing the need for nonurgent revascularization procedures was not observed. This study not only establishes the central role of platelet aggregation in the pathogenesis of acute ischemic complications associated with routine percutaneous revascularization, regardless of the patient's risk profile, but also provides proof that the clinical benefit derived from the inhibition of platelet thrombus formation by blockade of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor may be uncoupled from the risk of hemorrhage.

Although it is correlated with the risk of hemorrhage during catheterization or interventional procedures,8,9,10,11 adjunctive heparin therapy is universally employed in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization. On the basis of observational data indicating that the probability of abrupt vessel closure or ischemic complications may be related to lower levels of anticoagulation,12,13,14 the standard of care in many catheterization laboratories has been the routine administration of a bolus of 10,000 to 15,000 U of heparin to achieve an activated clotting time of at least 300 to 350 seconds before coronary angioplasty is begun.15,16

Previous studies demonstrating benefit from aggressive anticoagulant therapy with heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization may not, however, be relevant when more potent platelet inhibition is achieved. Moreover, heparin appears to potentiate the bleeding risk of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. In the EPIC study,2 the rate of major bleeding was increased from 6.6 percent among patients receiving placebo to 14 percent among those receiving abciximab, with the greatest risk of bleeding in the patients of lowest body weight, for whom the fixed heparin doses were highest on a weight-adjusted basis.2,3

Because the heparin doses in the current trial were adjusted for body weight (Table 1), even the patients on the standard-dose heparin regimen received less heparin than the boluses of 10,000 to 15,000 U that are frequently used empirically in clinical practice. Moreover, other interventions included early removal of the sheath (with elimination of postprocedural heparin infusion), meticulous care of the vascular access site, and transfusion guidelines. With this integrated strategy, major hemorrhage and the need for transfusions occurred infrequently in all three treatment groups, although the lowest rates of hemorrhagic complications, particularly minor bleeding, were observed when abciximab was administered with low-dose heparin.

Despite the reduction in the dosage of heparin, the treatment effect of abciximab in limiting ischemic complications of coronary revascularization was marked: for every 1000 patients treated, 65 fewer had acute adverse events. No other therapy has been reported to produce this degree of reduction in important myocardial ischemic events in a broad population of patients undergoing coronary intervention. The rates of myocardial infarction, most frequently non–Q-wave infarction, and of urgent revascularization were reduced by a similar magnitude (relative risk reductions of 58 and 68 percent, respectively). Although the clinical significance of periprocedural non–Q-wave myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary revascularization remains somewhat controversial, several recent reports have clearly demonstrated that patients who have elevated levels of creatine kinase after coronary intervention are at significantly greater risk for late death from cardiac causes than those who do not.17,18,19,20,21 An increased risk of late events has been observed in these studies even among patients with small elevations of creatine kinase MB (from more than 1 to 1.5 times the control value),19,21 but the risk of death appears to be proportional to the degree of enzyme elevation. The reduction in the rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction by abciximab in this trial occurred mainly for large, non–Q-wave infarctions (creatine kinase MB, >5 times the control value). This observation confirms that the ischemic events that were prevented would have been clinically relevant and not merely laboratory abnormalities.

Notably, the six-month outcome in the EPILOG trial differed from that in the EPIC trial with regard to the incidence of repeated revascularization events. In the EPIC trial, abciximab therapy was associated with a 26 percent reduction in the need for revascularization of the target vessel (defined as further revascularization in a vessel treated during the index procedure),22 leading to the hypothesis that this agent may inhibit the process of restenosis. In the EPILOG trial, in contrast, no differences in long-term revascularization rates were observed. Acute ischemic events (death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization), however, were suppressed by abciximab throughout the six-month follow-up period. The reasons for the disparate effects of abciximab on nonurgent-revascularization rates in these two large-scale trials are unknown, but they may relate in part to changes in coronary interventional practice (including the unplanned use of stents in 12 percent of the patients in the EPILOG trial), or to differences in patient populations or the dosage of heparin.

The clinical applicability of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade during percutaneous coronary revascularization is potentially broad. However, the cost of abciximab ($1,407 per dose, on average)23 is an obstacle to the widespread use of this therapy. A formal economic analysis of the EPILOG trial will explore the key issue of the cost effectiveness of this treatment. Other important considerations include the associated risk of thrombocytopenia and the currently unknown consequences of readministration of this chimeric antibody fragment (IgG antibody response develops in approximately 6 percent of patients on first administration).

In summary, this trial establishes that blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with abciximab has potentially broad clinical use in reducing ischemic complications associated with percutaneous coronary revascularization. Optimal use of this treatment in clinical practice will require minimizing bleeding complications by using low-dose heparin therapy in conjunction with abciximab.

Supported by Centocor, Malvern, Pa., and Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis.

* The principal investigators and study coordinators of the Evaluation in PTCA to Improve Long-Term Outcome with Abciximab GP IIb/IIIa Blockade (EPILOG) Study Group are listed in the Appendix.


Source Information

Dr. Lincoff, as principal investigator of the study, assumes overall responsibility for the content and integrity of the article.

Address reprint requests to Dr. A. Michael Lincoff at the Department of Cardiology, F-25, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195.

References

  1. Phillips DR, Charo IF, Parise LV, Fitzgerald LA. The platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex. Blood 1988;71:831-843. [Free Full Text]
  2. The EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994;330:956-961. [Free Full Text]
  3. Aguirre FV, Topol EJ, Ferguson JJ, et al. Bleeding complications with the chimeric antibody to platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 1995;91:2882-2890. [Free Full Text]
  4. Lincoff AM, Tcheng JE, Califf RM, et al. Standard versus low dose weight-adjusted heparin in patients treated with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody fragment abciximab (c7E3 Fab) during percutaneous coronary revascularization. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:286-291. [CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Practice strategies for elective red blood cell transfusion. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:403-406.
  6. Rao AK, Pratt C, Berke A, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial -- phase I: hemorrhagic manifestations and changes in plasma fibrinogen and the fibrinolytic system in patients with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1-11. [Abstract]
  7. Landefeld CS, Cook EF, Flatley M, Weisberg M, Goldman L. Identification and preliminary validation of predictors of major bleeding in hospitalized patients starting anticoagulant therapy. Am J Med 1987;82:703-713. [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Muller DWM, Shamir KJ, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:63-68. [Medline]
  9. Johnson LW, Esente P, Giambartolomei A, et al. Peripheral vascular complications of coronary angioplasty by the femoral and brachial techniques. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;31:165-172. [Medline]
  10. Oweida SW, Roubin GS, Smith RB III, Salam AA. Postcatheterization vascular complications associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:310-315. [CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Friedman HZ, Cragg DR, Glazier SM, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of prolonged versus abbreviated intravenous heparin therapy after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1214-1219. [Abstract]
  12. Dougherty KG, Gaos CM, Bush HS, Leachman DR, Ferguson JJ. Activated clotting times and activated partial thromboplastin times in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty who receive bolus doses of heparin. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;26:260-263. [Medline]
  13. Narins CR, Hillegass WB Jr, Nelson CL, et al. Relation between activated clotting time during angioplasty and abrupt closure. Circulation 1996;93:667-671. [Free Full Text]
  14. McGarry TF Jr, Gottlieb RS, Morganroth J, et al. The relationship of anticoagulation level and complications after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1992;123:1445-1451. [CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Landau C, Lange RA, Hillis LD. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994;330:981-993. [Free Full Text]
  16. Bowers J, Ferguson JJ III. The use of activated clotting times to monitor heparin therapy during and after interventional procedures. Clin Cardiol 1994;17:357-361. [Medline]
  17. Abdelmeguid AE, Topol EJ, Whitlow PL, Sapp SK, Ellis SG. Significance of mild transient release of creatine kinase-MB fraction after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation 1996;94:1528-1536. [Free Full Text]
  18. Harrington RA, Lincoff AM, Califf RM, et al. Characteristics and consequences of myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT). J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1693-1699. [Abstract]
  19. Kong TQ, Davidson CJ, Meyers SN, Tauke JT, Parker MA, Bonow RO. Prognostic implication of creatine kinase elevation following elective coronary artery interventions. JAMA 1997;277:461-466. [Abstract]
  20. Tardiff BE, Califf RM, Tcheng JE, et al. Post-intervention cardiac enzyme elevations: prognostic significance in IMPACT II. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:Suppl A:83A-83A.abstract 
  21. Redwood SR, Popma JJ, Kent KM, et al. Predictors of late mortality following ablative new-device angioplasty in native coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:Suppl A:167A-167A.abstract 
  22. Topol EJ, Califf RM, Weisman HF, et al. Randomised trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: results at six months. Lancet 1994;343:881-886. [CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Mark DB, Talley JD, Topol EJ, et al. Economic assessment of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition for prevention of ischemic complications of high-risk coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1996;94:629-635. [Free Full Text]
Appendix

The following centers and investigators participated in the EPILOG Trial: Operations Committee: E.J. Topol (Study Chairman), R.M. Califf, A.M. Lincoff, J.E. Tcheng, C.F. Cabot, H.F. Weisman. Site Principal Investigators and Study Coordinators (patient enrollment in parentheses): Christ Hospital and University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH (238): D. Kereiakes, D. Lausten, J.P. Runyon, W. Howard. Moses Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, NC (176): T. Kelly, D. Muncy. William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (148): G. Timmis, M. Safian, D. Davey. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (144): N.S. Kleiman, D. Rose, L. Basinger. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH (125): A.M. Lincoff, C. Rouse. Our Lady of Lourdes, Cherry Hill, NJ (124): J. Kramer, R. Wilson. University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (118): J.D. Talley, M. Boyles. Mother Frances Hospital, Tyler, TX (88): F.I. Navetta, R. LeBueuf. Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, MI (85): P. Kraft, L. Dvorak. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (83): J. Tcheng, R.M. Smigla. Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX (73): J. Ferguson, M. Harlan. Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Lakeland, FL (71): K. Browne, M. Telatnik. Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA (70): J. Blankenship, L. Demko. Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL (67): R.J. Ivanhoe, C. Jackson. Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, NM (62): N. Shadoff, S. Goebel. Deborah Heart and Lung Center, Browns Mills, NJ (56): M. Taylor, E. Cleary. Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY (53): G. Gacioch, V. Chiodo. University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI (53): E. Bates, L. Quain. Cooper Medical Center, Haddon Heights, NJ (49): H. Snyder, R. Wilson. University Medical Center, Jacksonville, FL (43): T.A. Bass, G. Rohman. Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (41): A. Gradman, L. Boltey. Iowa Heart Center, Des Moines, IA (38): M. Tannenbaum, D. Stengl. Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI (36): P. Gordon, N. Wright. Milwaukee Heart and Vascular Clinic, Milwaukee, WI (36): F. Cummins, J. Nonnweiler. Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (34): T. Aversano, L. Peltzer. Methodist Hospital–Iowa Heart, Des Moines, IA (34): P. Bear, M.B. Craig. United Medical Center, Cheyenne, WY (30): L. Hattel, G. Tooke. Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX (30): H.V. Anderson, L. Weigelt. Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH (30): B. Hettleman, S. Kennedy. Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA (29): P.S. Teirstein, D. Claire. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA (28): I. Sarembock, S. Sayre. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL (26): C.J. Davidson, A. Schaechter. St. Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO (25): F. Aguirre, T. Stonner. University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT (25): M. Azrin, J. Bodett, M.B. Barry. Lancaster General Hospital, Lancaster, PA (24): S. Worley, L.A. Frey. Ottawa Civic Hospital, Ottawa, ON (24): J.F. Marquis, F. Reid. Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, FL (23): D.J. Spriggs, S.A. Wahl. Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT (23): M. Azrin, D. Hall. Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL (22): M.W. Weston, K. Yedinak. Riverside Hospital, Columbus, OH (21): B. George, D. Smith, C. Gilliland, D. Smith. Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC (21): D.R. Ricci, R. Fox. Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk, VA (20): C. Hartman, S. Lunow. Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (20): T. Farah, S. Petruolo. Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, LA (20): G. Sander, A. Stevens, K. Delise. Presbyterian Hospital, Charlotte, NC (18): B. Reen, D. Whisnant, L. Henderson. Arizona Heart Institute and Foundation, Phoenix, AZ (18): R. Heuser, K. Swiderski, M. Kaluzniak. Evanston Hospital, Evanston, IL (17): T. Larkin, B.J. Jackson. Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (17): J. Popma, N. Prunka. St. Patrick's Hospital, Missoula, MT (17): M. Sanz, D. Mayer, K. Mackey. University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB (17): J. Burton, N. Hogg. Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC (14): R. Brown, K. Stevens. Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA (13): W. French, S. Wang. Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON (13): A.G. Adelman, V. Foulger, S. Weber. Graduate Hospital, Philadelphia, PA (9): R. Gottlieb, J. Lavoie. Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA (9): S. King, F. Frerichs. St. Joseph's Hospital, Lancaster, PA (7): S. Worley, L. Hollywood. Health Sciences Center, Winnipeg, MB (7): J. Ducas, U. Schick. St. Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY (6): J.S. Hochman, J. Slater, D. Tormey. Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, NS (5): B.J. O'Neill, K. Foshay, N. Fitzgerald. St. Boniface General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB (5): P.K. Cheung, D. Bedard. Calgary Foothills Hospital, Calgary, AB (4): M.L. Knudtson, D. Galbraith, H. Watt. Baptist Memorial Hospital East, Memphis, TN (4): J. Samaha, B. Hamilton. Rush–Presbyterian–St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL (3): L.W. Klein, L. Hebson. Victoria Hospital Corp., London, ON (2): D. Almond, J. White. Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL (1): M.J. Rosenberg, S. Teully. Keesler Medical Center, Keesler AFB, MS (1): M. Unks, K. Rodgers. Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: D. Faxon (Chairman), J. Gore, S. Kelsey, K. Lee, D. Sane, L. Walters. Coordinating Center: J. Booth (Study Coordinator), R. Cannata, V. Castle, H. Cohen, S. DeLuca, M. Kutner, T. Knuth, A. Lincoff, T. McCollough, J. McPherson, J. Melton, D. Miller, M. Pulliam, S. Sapp, K.N. Sigmon. Clinical Events Committee: E. Montague (Committee Coordinator), K. Alexander, R. Augostini, C. Bajzer, B. Bart, G. Belli, J. Carlson, R. Challapalli, B. Crenshaw, I. Dawson, S. DeLuca, A. Dickey, A. Echols, B. Erickson, M.B. Fontana, S. Ghaffari, C. Gordon, C. Granger, G. Grano, R. Grimm, T. Johnson, N. Juran, A. Kingsley, K. Kruse, M. Lauer, K. Mahaffey, K. Malone, D. Mark, T. Marwick, R. Migrino, J. Miller, K. Newby, C. Pace, E. Peterson, R. Rabbani, J. Ragan, C. Rimmerman, S. Rodkey, V. Savor, W.F. Shaw, C. Sila, M. Silver, W. Tan, D. Tobiasz, P. Vandervoort, C.W. Wang, C. Ward, J. Waters, D. Wiehle, M. Winchell. Electrocardiographic Core Laboratory: D. Underwood (Chairman), P. Clemons, S. Heupler, M. Lauer, J. Powers, D. Rubin, E. Sgarbossa, S. Steinhubl. Angiographic Core Laboratory: D. Moliterno (Medical Director), D. Debowey (Director), E. Balazs, T. Crowe, T. Ivanc, L. Ols, R. Poliszczuk, H. Vilsack, B. Witherspoon. Economics and Quality of Life: D. Mark, L. Davidson-Ray. Centocor, Inc.: K.M. Anderson, C.F. Cabot, K.M. Giel, M.H. Musco, G.L. Stoner, H.F. Weisman.


 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade after Coronary Angioplasty
Khan S. S., Forrester J., Gambassi G., Landolfi R., Bernabei R., Lincoff A. M., Topol E. J., Califf R. M., Holmes D. R.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1243-1245, Oct 23, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.