The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Brief Report
PreviousPrevious
Volume 337:1275-1277 October 30, 1997 Number 18
NextNext

Anaphylaxis from the Carboxymethylcellulose Component of Barium Sulfate Suspension
Nobuyuki Muroi, Ph.D., Masahiro Nishibori, M.D., Ph.D., Takashi Fujii, M.D., Masakazu Yamagata, M.D., Sachiko Hosoi, Naoki Nakaya, Ph.D., Kiyomi Saeki, M.D., Ph.D., and Kimio Henmi, M.D., Ph.D.

 

This Article
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Although allergic reactions to barium sulfate suspensions are estimated to occur at a rate of less than 2 per million,1,2 the frequency has been reported to be increasing.3,4 The cause of these reactions is not known,5,6,7,8,9 but the additives in barium suspensions,10,11,12,13 medications such as glucagon,3 and exposure to latex14,15,16,17 — for example, through contact with rubber gloves or balloons — have all been implicated.

We describe a patient with anaphylaxis induced by the carboxymethylcellulose sodium in barium sulfate suspension. The reaction occurred after an upper gastrointestinal examination.

Case Report

A 63-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital in May 1994 because of an anaphylactic reaction after a double-contrast upper gastrointestinal examination. Before the examination, she had no abdominal discomfort. She had no history of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, or asthma and had not had any side effects from earlier barium studies. The examination was performed with a 100 percent (wt/vol) suspension of barium sulfate (Balgin S Solution number 3, Kaigen, Osaka, Japan) and gas-producing granules (Kaigen). No other medications were given. The examination revealed no gastritis or peptic ulcers. About 30 minutes later, the patient reported generalized pruritus and urticarial lesions on her abdomen, arms, and face, as well as mild periorbital edema. Within minutes she lost consciousness briefly and had tonic convulsions.

On admission, a complete blood count, blood chemical values, and serologic tests were normal. Chest radiographs revealed no abnormalities. The white-cell count was 6400 per cubic millimeter, with 0.5 percent eosinophils. The patient again had transient loss of consciousness and hypotension. She was resuscitated with subcutaneous injections of epinephrine (0.5 mg), intravenous infusion of fluids, and two injections of methylprednisolone sodium succinate (250 mg each). The urticarial lesions disappeared after 24 hours. The patient recovered fully and went home eight days later.

Methods

Skin Testing

After obtaining oral informed consent, we studied the patient and three healthy subjects without atopy or allergies. We conducted skin-scratch tests for each of the components of the barium suspension: barium sulfate, carboxymethylcellulose sodium, sodium metaphosphate, sodium benzoate, sodium dehydroacetate, ethyl parahydroxybenzoate, propyl parahydroxybenzoate, glacial acetic acid, saccharin sodium, and flavorings. All substances (purity, more than 98.0 percent) were mixed with petrolatum and liquid paraffin (10 percent wt/wt) and applied to the skin. The response was evaluated 20 minutes later. The patient also underwent skin-scratch testing with barium sulfate suspension that contained 1.2 percent carboxymethylcellulose sodium and with barium suspension free of carboxymethylcellulose. All the components of the suspension as well as the suspension that did not contain carboxymethylcellulose sodium were obtained from Kaigen.

Histamine Release from Isolated Leukocytes

Peripheral blood was withdrawn from the forearm vein of the patient and the three subjects. The blood was layered in a solution containing 4.5 percent Ficoll and 12 percent iothalamate meglumine (specific gravity, 1.077) and centrifuged at 350xg for 35 minutes to isolate the leukocytes. Isolated leukocytes were washed twice with Hanks' balanced salt solution, resuspended in the same buffer, and then placed in eppendorf tubes in aliquots of 180 µl.

The leukocyte suspension was incubated for five minutes at 37°C before the diluted carboxymethylcellulose sodium with the suspending buffer was added (final volume, 200 µl). The reaction was stopped after 15 minutes. To examine the effect of N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine,18 it was added to the leukocyte suspension instead of carboxymethylcellulose. The reaction was stopped by cooling the mixture on ice, and each tube was then centrifuged at 1800xg for five minutes at 4°C. Both the supernatant and the precipitate were assayed for histamine content according to a method described previously,19 and the results were presented as a percentage of histamine release.

Results

The results of skin testing are summarized in Table 1. A positive reaction was observed only with carboxymethylcellulose sodium (wheal, 21 by 21 mm in diameter; flare, 55 by 45 mm) and with the barium sulfate suspension containing carboxymethylcellulose sodium (wheal, 25 by 20 mm; flare, 57 by 50 mm). The results of skin testing with the gas-producing granules — sodium bicarbonate, tartrate, and saccharin sodium — were also negative. The three control subjects had no response to all agents tested.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Results of Skin Testing in the Patient.

 
The degree of histamine release from leukocytes that was induced by carboxymethylcellulose sodium was studied in vitro (Figure 1A). The patient's leukocytes responded to carboxymethylcellulose sodium at concentrations ranging from 10-4.5 to 10-2.6 percent, with a maximal response at a concentration of 10-3.6 percent. The dose–response curve for the effect of carboxymethylcellulose sodium on histamine release was bell-shaped. There was no release of histamine from leukocytes from the three normal subjects, even in the presence of high concentrations of carboxymethylcellulose sodium. The degree of histamine release by basophils in response to N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine was similar in the patient and the three normal subjects (Figure 1B), indicating that all had normal signal transduction with respect to histamine secretion.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Release of Histamine from Leukocytes Induced by Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium or N-Formyl-Methionyl-Leucyl-Phenylalanine.

Leukocytes were isolated from peripheral-blood samples from the patient ({bigcirc}) and three normal subjects (•, {blacktriangleup}, and {blacksquare}). Leukocytes were incubated for 5 minutes at 37°C before being exposed to carboxymethylcellulose sodium (Panel A) or N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (Panel B) for 15 minutes. Values in Panel A are the means (±SE) of three experiments, and values in Panel B are the means of two or three experiments. The P values indicate a significant difference as compared with the value in the absence of carboxymethylcellulose sodium (by analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test).

 
Discussion

Although the carboxymethylcellulose component used for the barium study, skin testing, and histamine-release experiment contained chloride, sulfate, and silicate as impurities (less than 0.64 percent, 0.96 percent, and 0.5 percent, respectively), it is quite unlikely that the inorganic salts caused the anaphylactic response. Therefore, the results of skin testing and in vitro histamine release as a whole indicated that carboxymethylcellulose sodium was the antigen responsible for the anaphylactic response to barium suspension in our patient.

Various allergic reactions to barium radiography have been reported. Pure barium sulfate is inert and nonantigenic, but various ingredients are added to improve the coating, flow, taste, and color of the suspension and to prevent settling, foaming, and flocculation. These ingredients are approved food additives; however, one of them, methylparaben, has been reported as causing an anaphylactic reaction after a barium enema.10 In our patient, skin testing identified carboxymethylcellulose sodium as the antigen causing the anaphylactic reaction. It also induced the release of histamine from leukocytes in vitro. The injection of penicillin or corticosteroids containing carboxymethylcellulose sodium has also been reported to induce an anaphylactic reaction in cattle and humans.20,21,22

Carboxymethylcellulose sodium is widely used as a suspending agent in pharmaceutical preparations, certain food products, and cosmetics. Therefore, previous exposure may have led to sensitization in our patient, although carboxymethylcellulose sodium is generally considered not to be absorbed. In summary, our patient had an anaphylactic reaction caused by the ingestion of carboxymethylcellulose sodium in barium sulfate suspension. Although not a common complication, such a reaction may occur in patients sensitized to carboxymethylcellulose sodium.


Source Information

From Ako Municipal Hospital, Ako (N.M., T.F., M.Y., S.H., K.H.), and the Department of Pharmacology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama (M.N., N.N., K.S.) — both in Japan.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Nishibori at the Department of Pharmacology, Okayama University Medical School, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 700, Japan.

References

  1. Gelfand DW, Sowers JC, DePonte KA, Sumner TE, Ott DJ. Anaphylactic and allergic reactions during double-contrast studies: is glucagonor barium suspension the allergen? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;144:405-406. [Free Full Text]
  2. Janower ML. Hypersensitivity reactions after barium studies of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Radiology 1986;161:139-140. [Free Full Text]
  3. Feczko PJ. Increased frequency of reactions to contrast materials during gastrointestinal studies. Radiology 1990;174:367-368. [Free Full Text]
  4. Stringer DA, Hassall E, Ferguson AC, Cairns R, Nadel H, Sargent M. Hypersensitivity reaction to single contrast barium meal studies in children. Pediatr Radiol 1993;23:587-588. [Medline]
  5. McAvoy M, Young JW, Keramati B. Hypersensitivity reaction to barium suspension. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;144:1316-1316. [Medline]
  6. Nagi B, Mandal M, Kochhar R, Mehta SK. Hypersensitivity reaction after barium meal examination. Allergy 1988;43:473-474. [Medline]
  7. Shaffer HA Jr, Eckard DA, de Lange EE, Ramakrishnan MR. Allergy to barium sulfate suspension with angioedema of the stomach and small bowel. Gastrointest Radiol 1988;13:221-223. [Medline]
  8. Feczko PJ, Simms SM, Bakirci N. Fatal hypersensitivity reaction during a barium enema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:275-276. [Free Full Text]
  9. Brenner JS, O'Neill J, Kaude JV. Hypersensitivity reaction during barium enema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:199-199. [Medline]
  10. Schwartz EE, Glick SN, Foggs MB, Silverstein GS. Hypersensitivity reactions after barium enema examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:103-104. [Free Full Text]
  11. Hoyt TS, Peet GJ. Allergic reaction during double-contrast upper GI series. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145:653-654. [Medline]
  12. al-Mudallal R, Rosenbaum H, Schwartz HJ, Boyle JM. Anaphylactic reaction to barium enema. Am J Med 1990;89:251-251. [Medline]
  13. Janower ML. Reactions to contrast materials during gastrointestinal studies. Radiology 1990;177:287-287. [Free Full Text]
  14. Warpinski JR, Bush RK. Latex hypersensitivity. Am J Med 1991;90:769-770. [Medline]
  15. Ownby DR, Tomlanovich M, Sammons N, McCullough J. Anaphylaxis associated with latex allergy during barium enema examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:903-908. [Abstract]
  16. Misselbeck WJ, Gray KR, Uphold RE. Latex induced anaphylaxis: a case report. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12:445-447. [Medline]
  17. Tarlo SM, Dolovich J, Listgarten C. Anaphylaxis to carrageenan: a pseudo-latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;95:933-936. [Medline]
  18. de Paulis A, Ciccarelli A, de Crescenzo G, Cirillo R, Patella V, Marone G. Cyclosporin H is a potent and selective competitive antagonist of human basophil activation by N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;98:152-164. [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Itoh Y, Oishi R, Adachi N, Saeki K. A highly sensitive assay for histamine using ion-pair HPLC coupled with postcolumn fluorescent derivatization: its application to biological specimens. J Neurochem 1992;58:884-889. [CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Leemann W, De Weck AL, Schneider CH. Hypersensitivity to carboxymethyl-cellulose as a cause of anaphylactic reactions to drugs in cattle. Nature 1969;223:621-623. [Medline]
  21. Patterson DL, Yunginger JW, Dunn WF, Jones RT, Hunt LW. Anaphylaxis induced by the carboxymethylcellulose component of injectable triamcinolone acetonide suspension (Kenalog). Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1995;74:163-166. [Medline]
  22. Murrieta-Aguttes M, Michelen V, Leynadier F, Duarte-Risselin C, Halpern GM, Dry J. Systemic allergic reactions to corticosteroids. J Asthma 1991;28:329-339. [Medline]

 

This Article
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Prevention of Barium Impaction
van Beek E. J.R., Reeders J. W.A.J., McDonnell W. M., Jung F.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:623-624, Feb 26, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.