The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 1998;338(2):139.

Original Article
Volume 337:1405-1411 November 13, 1997 Number 20
NextNext

Effect of Inhaled Formoterol and Budesonide on Exacerbations of Asthma
Romain A. Pauwels, M.D., Claes-Göran Löfdahl, M.D., Dirkje S. Postma, M.D., Anne E. Tattersfield, M.D., Paul O'Byrne, M.B., Peter J. Barnes, D.M., Anders Ullman, M.D., for The Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The role of long-acting, inhaled {beta}2-agonists in treating asthma is uncertain. In a double-blind study, we evaluated the effects of adding inhaled formoterol to both lower and higher doses of the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide.

Methods After a four-week run-in period of treatment with budesonide (800 µg twice daily), 852 patients being treated with glucocorticoids were randomly assigned to one of four treatments given twice daily by means of a dry-powder inhaler (Turbuhaler): 100 µg of budesonide plus placebo, 100 µg of budesonide plus 12 µg of formoterol, 400 µg of budesonide plus placebo, or 400 µg of budesonide plus 12 µg of formoterol. Terbutaline was permitted as needed. Treatment continued for one year; we compared the frequency of exacerbations of asthma, symptoms, and lung function in the four groups. A severe exacerbation was defined by the need for oral glucocorticoids or a decrease in the peak flow to more than 30 percent below the base-line value on two consecutive days.

Results The rates of severe and mild exacerbations were reduced by 26 percent and 40 percent, respectively, when formoterol was added to the lower dose of budesonide. The higher dose of budesonide alone reduced the rates of severe and mild exacerbations by 49 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Patients treated with formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide had the greatest reductions — 63 percent and 62 percent, respectively. Symptoms of asthma and lung function improved with both formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide, but the improvements with formoterol were greater.

Conclusions In patients who have persistent symptoms of asthma despite treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids, the addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy or the use of a higher dose of budesonide may be beneficial. The addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy improves symptoms and lung function without lessening the control of asthma.


Inhaled glucocorticoids are considered the first-line treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe, persistent asthma.1,2,3 However, many patients taking an inhaled glucocorticoid continue to have symptoms and need additional treatment. Inhaled {beta}2-agonists are widely used for symptomatic relief in patients with asthma, but their regular use has been the subject of recent controversy.4,5,6 Treatment with the long-acting, inhaled {beta}2-agonists formoterol and salmeterol provides better control of symptoms and improves lung function more than short-acting {beta}2-agonists.7,8 Combining a long-acting, inhaled {beta}2-agonist with an inhaled glucocorticoid led to a greater improvement in the control of symptoms and in lung function than doubling the dose of the inhaled glucocorticoid.9,10 However, some studies have suggested that long-term treatment with long-acting, inhaled {beta}2-agonists might result in tolerance to its effects or mask an increase in airway inflammation.11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20

We studied the hypothesis that the addition of regular treatment with the long-acting, inhaled {beta}2-agonist formoterol to a lower or higher dose of the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide would result in improved control of symptoms and lung function, without any long-term deterioration in the control of asthma over a 12-month period. The primary outcomes evaluated were the rates of severe and mild exacerbations of asthma. Secondary outcomes included lung function, symptoms, and the need for {beta}2-agonists for rescue therapy.

Methods

Patients

Patients 18 to 70 years old, who had had asthma for at least six months and had been treated with an inhaled glucocorticoid for at least three months were enrolled. The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at base line had to be at least 50 percent of the predicted value,21 with an increase of at least 15 percent in FEV1 from the base-line value after the inhalation of 1 mg of terbutaline. Patients taking more than 2000 µg of beclomethasone or 1600 µg of budesonide daily by pressurized metered-dose inhaler, 800 µg of budesonide daily by Turbuhaler dry-powder inhaler (Astra, Södertällje, Sweden), or 800 µg of fluticasone daily were excluded. They were also excluded if they had had three or more courses of oral glucocorticoids or had been hospitalized for asthma during the previous six months.

Study Design

The study was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study with four treatment groups. It was carried out at 71 centers in nine countries (Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom). Approval from regulatory agencies and ethics committees was obtained in all countries and at all centers. All patients gave witnessed oral or written informed consent.

The study had a 4-week run-in period, followed by 12 months of randomized treatment. There were nine scheduled visits to the clinic: at the start of the run-in period, at the start of treatment, and after 2 weeks and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment. In addition, telephone contacts were scheduled with the patients after 2 weeks of the run-in period, after 2 to 5 days of treatment, and after 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11 months of treatment.

All patients entering the run-in phase received inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort, Astra Draco, Lund, Sweden) at a dose of 800 µg twice daily (total daily dose, 1600 µg), plus 250 µg of inhaled terbutaline (Bricanyl, Astra Draco) as needed. At the end of the run-in period, patients were eligible for randomization if they had complied with the run-in treatment and had stable asthma. Compliance was defined as the use of 75 to 125 percent of the recommended number of doses of inhaled budesonide, as indicated on a hidden mechanical counter built into the dry-powder inhaler that could be read only by the investigators. Asthma was defined as stable if none of the following occurred during the last 10 days of the run-in period: diurnal variation of more than 20 percent in the peak expiratory flow on 2 consecutive days; use of four or more inhalations of {beta}2-agonist per day on 2 consecutive days; awakening due to asthma on 2 consecutive nights; or the need to use oral glucocorticoids.

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following treatments (each dose was given twice daily) for a period of 12 months: 100 µg of budesonide (total daily dose, 200 µg) plus placebo; 100 µg of budesonide plus 12 µg of formoterol (Oxis, Astra Draco; total daily dose, 24 µg); 400 µg of budesonide (total daily dose, 800 µg) plus placebo; or 400 µg of budesonide plus 12 µg of formoterol. Terbutaline (250 µg per inhalation) was used as rescue medication. All medications were inhaled by means of a multidose Turbuhaler. The stated doses of budesonide, formoterol, and terbutaline are the metered doses. The patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups in balanced blocks of four at each center.

Outcome Measures

            Exacerbations of Asthma

The primary outcomes studied were the rates of severe and mild exacerbations of asthma per patient per year. A severe exacerbation was defined as one requiring treatment with oral glucocorticoids, as judged by the investigator, or a decrease in the peak expiratory flow as measured in the morning to more than 30 percent below the base-line value on two consecutive days. Seventy-three percent of severe exacerbations were identified clinically by the investigators. The base-line peak expiratory flow was defined as the mean peak expiratory flow in the morning during the last 10 days of the run-in period. All severe exacerbations had to be treated with a 10-day course of oral glucocorticoids (30 mg of prednisolone or prednisone or 24 mg of methylprednisolone per day). Patients who had three severe exacerbations within three months or a total of five severe exacerbations were withdrawn from the study. Days with mild exacerbations were defined as days when one of the following occurred: a peak expiratory flow in the morning that was more than 20 percent below the base-line value; the use of more than three additional inhalations of terbutaline per 24 hours as compared with the base-line period; or awakening at night due to asthma. Single, isolated days of mild exacerbations were not counted. The base-line value was the mean value for the variable during the last 10 days of the run-in period. Days included in a severe exacerbation were excluded from the count of days with mild exacerbations.

            Diary-Card Data

Patients filled in a daily diary during the run-in and treatment periods, recording the best of three measurements of peak expiratory flow made with a Vitalograph Peak Flow Meter (Vitalograph, Buckingham, United Kingdom) in the morning and evening before medication; symptoms of asthma during the night or the daytime (according to a 4-point scale, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 3 incapacitating symptoms); awakening due to asthma; use of inhalations of terbutaline for rescue therapy (at night or during the day); and the use of oral glucocorticoids.

            Clinic Visits

At scheduled clinic visits, clinical measures, adverse events, withdrawals, or changes in medication were recorded, diary cards were reviewed, and FEV1 was measured.

            Episode-Free Days

An episode-free day was defined as a day with optimally controlled asthma — that is, no need for rescue therapy with inhaled {beta}2-agonists, an asthma-symptom score of 0, a morning peak expiratory flow that was 80 percent or more of the base-line value, and no adverse events.

Statistical Analysis

The data analysis followed a factorial design, and pairwise comparisons were made by appropriate contrasts. Rates of exacerbation were analyzed by applying a Poisson regression model. Other variables were analyzed with use of analysis of covariance, with base-line variables as covariates. For data from the diaries, mean values for the last 10 days before each visit were used. The analysis included all randomized patients (intention-to-treat approach). Data for patients who withdrew or discontinued therapy were included up to the time of their withdrawal. The number of days when treatment was received was entered as a covariate.

Results

From April 1994 to April 1995, consecutive potentially eligible patients were identified at the participating institutions. Of the 1114 patients entering the run-in period, 262 were excluded before randomization because they were determined to be ineligible. The remaining 852 patients (436 women and 416 men) were randomly assigned to treatment groups. Base-line demographic and spirometric characteristics and diary-card data are presented in Table 1. The differences in base-line data among the groups were minor and nonsignificant. Of the 852 patients randomly assigned to receive treatment, 694 (81 percent) completed the 12-month study. Of the 158 patients who did not complete the study, 44 did not fulfill the entry criteria and were incorrectly randomized, 30 had worsening of asthma, 29 had adverse events, and 55 left the study for other reasons (13 because of noncompliance with study procedures, 5 because they intended to become pregnant, 5 because they relocated, 20 for personal reasons, and 12 because they were lost to follow-up). Most of the incorrectly randomized patients were withdrawn in the initial part of the study after a visit to the clinic for monitoring. Only three remained in the study for more than 90 days.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Base-Line Characteristics of the Study Patients.

 
Exacerbations of Asthma

Table 2 shows the two primary outcome variables, the rate of severe exacerbations and the rate of mild exacerbations, according to treatment group. The lowest rates were among the patients who received the higher dose of budesonide plus formoterol. There was no significant interaction between budesonide and formoterol in terms of either severe or mild exacerbations. Formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide produced additive reductions in severe and mild exacerbations.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Clinical Outcomes.

 
The rate of severe exacerbations was reduced by 26 percent when formoterol was added to the lower dose of budesonide and by 49 percent when the higher dose of budesonide was given alone. The combination of formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide reduced the estimated rate of severe exacerbations by 63 percent, from 0.91 per year per patient to 0.34 (P<0.001). Giving the higher dose of budesonide resulted in a greater reduction in the rate of severe exacerbations than did the addition of formoterol (P = 0.03). Altogether, 80.8 percent of the patients receiving both formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide were free of severe exacerbations during the study, as compared with 61.4 percent of the patients receiving the lower dose of budesonide without formoterol. Of the 30 patients who left the study because their asthma worsened, 21 were withdrawn because they had frequent severe exacerbations: 10 receiving the lower dose of budesonide alone, 7 receiving the lower dose of budesonide plus formoterol, 4 receiving only the higher dose of budesonide, and none receiving the higher dose of budesonide plus formoterol (P = 0.01 for the difference among the treatment groups).

The rate of mild exacerbations was reduced by 37 percent when the higher dose of budesonide, rather than the lower dose, was given and by 40 percent when formoterol was added to the lower dose of budesonide. The combination of budesonide and the higher dose of formoterol reduced the estimated rate of mild exacerbations by 62 percent, from 35.4 per patient per year to 13.4 (P<0.001). There was no significant change in the rate of severe or mild exacerbations in any treatment group during the course of the study.

Symptoms

At the end of the run-in period, when patients received 800 µg of budesonide twice a day, clinical-symptom scores, the rate of use of rescue medication, and the frequency of nighttime awakening were low in all four groups (Table 1). The addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy was associated with a significant further improvement in both daytime and nighttime symptom scores (Table 2). The higher dose of budesonide was significantly better than the lower dose in controlling symptoms during the day, but patients in both treatment groups that received budesonide without formoterol had a slight increase in symptom scores as compared with the run-in period.

The need for rescue medication was reduced significantly by adding formoterol, during both the day and the night, and by the use of the higher dose of budesonide, during the night but not during the day. The addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy was associated with a significantly increased number of episode-free days; the higher dose of budesonide was not associated with a significant increase (Table 2).

Lung Function

FEV1 increased significantly in all groups during the run-in period and increased further with the addition of formoterol (Figure 1). The higher dose of budesonide was associated with a significantly higher FEV1 than the lower dose. Peak expiratory flow in the morning and evening increased considerably when formoterol was added (Figure 2). The higher dose of budesonide was associated with a significant increase in peak expiratory flow, although less than that associated with the addition of formoterol.


View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) during the Study.

FEV1 is shown as a mean percentage of the predicted value during the run-in period (shaded area) and the treatment period. The bars indicate 2 SE. During the run-in period, all patients received 800 µg of budesonide twice daily. Patients were then randomly assigned to twice-daily treatment with 100 µg of budesonide, 100 µg of budesonide plus 12 µg of formoterol, 400 µg of budesonide, or 400 µg of budesonide plus 12 µg of formoterol.

 

View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Changes in Mean Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) in the Morning during the Run-in Period, on Days 1 through 14 of Treatment, and at Months 1 through 12 of Treatment.

During the run-in period all patients received 800 µg of budesonide twice daily. Patients were then randomly assigned to twice-daily treatment with 100 µg of budesonide, 100 µg of budesonide plus 12 µg of formoterol, 400 µg of budesonide, or 400 µg of budesonide plus 12 µg of formoterol.

 
In the formoterol groups, the peak expiratory flow in the morning was higher during the first days of treatment than subsequently (i.e., after day 3; P<0.001). For the rest of the 12-month treatment period, the peak expiratory flow remained stable and considerably higher than the value in the groups treated with budesonide alone (Figure 2).

Adverse Events

All treatments were well tolerated throughout the study. The proportion of patients reporting adverse events was similar in the four treatment groups. Eleven patients were hospitalized because of asthma: three receiving the lower dose of budesonide plus placebo, one receiving the lower dose of budesonide plus formoterol, five receiving the higher dose of budesonide plus placebo, and two receiving the higher dose of budesonide plus formoterol. Twenty-nine patients withdrew because of adverse events: six receiving lower-dose budesonide plus placebo, six receiving lower-dose budesonide plus formoterol, eight receiving higher-dose budesonide plus placebo, and nine receiving higher-dose budesonide plus formoterol. Seven withdrawals were due to pharmacologically predictable adverse events: three in the group receiving lower-dose budesonide plus formoterol (one with headache and two with tremor) and four in the group receiving higher-dose budesonide plus formoterol (two with tremor, one with tachycardia, and one with oral candidiasis). The other 22 withdrawals were due to throat irritation (2 patients), gastrointestinal effects (5), and miscellaneous side effects (15).

Discussion

We examined the hypothesis that adding regular treatment with the long-acting inhaled {beta}2-agonist formoterol to therapy with the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide would improve symptoms of asthma without a long-term worsening of the disease, as indicated by the rates of severe and mild exacerbations. We found no evidence of deterioration in the control of asthma over the course of a year when formoterol was added to budesonide therapy. In fact, the addition of formoterol decreased the incidence of both severe and mild exacerbations. This effect was independent of the dose of budesonide. The rates of severe and mild exacerbations were also lower among the patients given the higher dose of budesonide; this effect was independent of the addition of formoterol. For severe exacerbations, the effect of the higher dose of budesonide was significantly more pronounced than the effect of formoterol.

Regular treatment with long-acting, inhaled {beta}2-agonists has not been shown to modify chronic airway inflammation in patients with asthma.22,23 The reason for the reduction in the rate of severe exacerbations with formoterol is not clear. Possible explanations include an inhibitory effect on the acute inflammatory changes that occur during a severe exacerbation; an inhibitory effect on airway smooth-muscle contraction, plasma extravasation, or both — assuming that these are important to the development of severe acute exacerbations; and an increased deposition of budesonide in the airways after the inhalation of formoterol. Acute exacerbations of asthma are associated with an influx of eosinophils, neutrophils, or both.24,25 Formoterol has been shown to inhibit the influx of inflammatory cells in animal models of acute airway inflammation.26 Formoterol is a potent functional antagonist of airway smooth-muscle stimulants and inhibits plasma extravasation.27,28,29,30

In our study, the addition of formoterol to either the lower or the higher dose of budesonide also improved asthma-symptom scores and lung function and reduced the need for rescue medications. The improvement in the control of symptoms is in agreement with the results of other studies, which have shown better control of symptoms when long-acting, inhaled {beta}2-agonists are added to the treatment regimen.7,8,9,10,31,32

The control of asthma symptoms and lung function were better in the higher-dose budesonide groups than in the lower-dose groups, although the effect of increasing the dose of budesonide on these measures was less marked than that of adding formoterol. The relative effects of adding formoterol or giving a higher dose of budesonide on the control of symptoms and on lung function in this study are in keeping with observations made with salmeterol.9,10

Regular treatment with formoterol combined with budesonide did not cause any long-term loss of control of asthma. There were no signs of worsening of disease or tolerance to the effects of medication with regard to any clinical or functional variable examined, except for a decrease in the effect of formoterol on peak expiratory flow in the morning after the first two days of treatment. The addition of formoterol resulted in a substantial increase in peak expiratory flow in the morning during the first one to two days of treatment, followed by a slight decrease in both budesonide groups. The peak expiratory flow then remained stable and significantly higher than in the budesonide-only groups for the rest of the one-year study period. One possible explanation is the development of limited tolerance to the bronchodilating effect of formoterol during the early phase of regular treatment, as demonstrated in other studies.11,12,13,14,15,16,18,19 Our findings suggest that such tolerance has little or no clinical significance.

It is important to emphasize that our conclusions may apply only when formoterol is given with an inhaled glucocorticoid.33 Another limitation of our study is that patients underwent randomization only if they had stable asthma during the last 10 days of the run-in period, when all patients were treated with 1600 µg of budesonide daily. This is a relatively high dose of budesonide, considering that inhalation from a Turbuhaler delivers twice as much budesonide to the airways as inhalation from pressurized metered-dose inhalers.34,35

Our results support therapeutic guidelines that recommend the addition of a long-acting inhaled {beta}2-agonist to low doses of inhaled glucocorticoids in patients with persistent symptoms of asthma or less than optimal lung function.3 Increasing the maintenance dose of inhaled glucocorticoids might be a more appropriate initial therapeutic step in patients with repeated severe exacerbations of asthma.

Supported by a grant from Astra Draco, Lund, Sweden.

* The members of the study group are listed in the Appendix.


Source Information

From the Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (R.A.P.); the Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (C.-G.L.); the Division of Respiratory Disease, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands (D.S.P.); the Division of Respiratory Medicine, City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom (A.E.T.); the Department of Respirology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada (P.O.); the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London (P.J.B.); and Clinical Research and Development, Astra Draco, Lund, Sweden (A.U.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Pauwels at the Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B9000 Ghent, Belgium.

References

  1. Haahtela T, Järvinen M, Kava T, et al. Comparison of a {beta}2-agonist, terbutaline, with an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, in newly detected asthma. N Engl J Med 1991;325:388-392. [Abstract]
  2. van Essen-Zandvliet EE, Hughes MD, Waalkens HJ, Duiverman EJ, Pocock SJ, Kerrebijn KF. Effects of 22 months of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and/or beta-2-agonists on lung function, airway responsiveness, and symptoms in children with asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:547-554. [Medline]
  3. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Washington, D.C.: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 1995. (Publication no. 95-3659.)
  4. Sears MR, Taylor DR, Print CG, et al. Regular inhaled beta-agonist treatment in bronchial asthma. Lancet 1990;336:1391-1396. [CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Spitzer WO, Suissa S, Ernst P, et al. The use of {beta}-agonists and the risk of death and near death from asthma. N Engl J Med 1992;326:501-506. [Abstract]
  6. Drazen JM, Israel E, Boushey HA, et al. Comparison of regularly scheduled with as-needed use of albuterol in mild asthma. N Engl J Med 1996;335:841-847. [Free Full Text]
  7. Pearlman DS, Chervinsky P, LaForce C, et al. A comparison of salmeterol with albuterol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1420-1425. [Abstract]
  8. Kesten S, Chapman KR, Broder I, et al. A three-month comparison of twice daily inhaled formoterol versus four times daily inhaled albuterol in the management of stable asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:622-625. [Medline]
  9. Greening AP, Ind PW, Northfield M, Shaw G. Added salmeterol versus higher-dose corticosteroid in asthma patients with symptoms on existing inhaled corticosteroid. Lancet 1994;344:219-224. [CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Woolcock A, Lundback B, Ringdal N, Jacques LA. Comparison of addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroids with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:1481-1488. [Abstract]
  11. Kalra S, Swystun VA, Bhagat R, Cockcroft DW. Inhaled corticosteroids do not prevent the development of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol. Chest 1996;109:953-956. [Free Full Text]
  12. Bhagat R, Kalra S, Swystun VA, Cockcroft DW. Rapid onset of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol. Chest 1995;108:1235-1239. [Erratum, Chest 1996;109:592.] [Free Full Text]
  13. Cheung D, Timmers MC, Zwinderman AH, Bel EH, Dijkman JH, Sterk PJ. Long-term effects of a long-acting {beta}2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, on airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1198-1203. [Abstract]
  14. Ramage L, Lipworth BJ, Ingram CG, Cree IA, Dhillon DP. Reduced protection against exercise induced bronchoconstriction after chronic dosing with salmeterol. Respir Med 1994;88:363-368. [CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Newnham DM, McDevitt DG, Lipworth BJ. Bronchodilator subsensitivity after chronic dosing with eformoterol in patients with asthma. Am J Med 1994;97:29-37. [CrossRef][Medline]
  16. O'Connor BJ, Aikman SL, Barnes PJ. Tolerance to the nonbronchodilator effects of inhaled {beta}2-agonists in asthma. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1204-1208. [Abstract]
  17. Tattersfield AE. Clinical pharmacology of long-acting beta-receptor agonists. Life Sci 1993;52:2161-2169. [Medline]
  18. Cockcroft DW, Swystun VA, Bhagat R. Interaction of inhaled beta 2 agonist and inhaled corticosteroid on airway responsiveness to allergen and methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1485-1489. [Abstract]
  19. Yates DH, Sussman HS, Shaw MJ, Barnes PJ, Chung KF. Regular formoterol treatment in mild asthma: effect on bronchial responsiveness during and after treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1170-1174. [Abstract]
  20. Lofdahl CG, Svedmyr N. Beta-agonists -- friends or foes? Eur Respir J 1991;4:1161-1165. [Medline]
  21. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows: report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal: official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993;6:Suppl 16:5-40. [Medline]
  22. Roberts JA, Bradding P, Walls AF, et al. The influence of salmeterol xinafoate on mucosal inflammation in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:Suppl:A418-A418.abstract 
  23. Gardiner PV, Ward C, Booth H, Allison A, Hendrick DJ, Walters EH. Effect of eight weeks of treatment with salmeterol on bronchoalveolar lavage inflammatory indices in asthmatics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:1006-1011. [Abstract]
  24. Turner MO, Hussack P, Sears MR, Dolovich J, Hargreave FE. Exacerbations of asthma without sputum eosinophilia. Thorax 1995;50:1057-1061. [Free Full Text]
  25. Fahy JV, Kim KW, Liu J, Boushey HA. Prominent neutrophilic inflammation in sputum from subjects with asthma exacerbation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;95:843-852. [CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Whelan CJ, Johnson M, Vardey CJ. Comparison of the anti-inflammatory properties of formoterol, salbutamol and salmeterol in guinea-pig skin and lung. Br J Pharmacol 1993;110:613-618. [Medline]
  27. Erjefalt I, Persson CG. Long duration and high potency of antiexudative effects of formoterol in guinea-pig tracheobronchial airways. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:788-791. [Medline]
  28. Advenier C, Qian Y, Koune JD, Molimard M, Candenas ML, Naline E. Formoterol and salbutamol inhibit bradykinin- and histamine-induced airway microvascular leakage in guinea-pig. Br J Pharmacol 1992;105:792-798. [Medline]
  29. Baluk P, McDonald DM. The beta 2-adrenergic receptor agonist formoterol reduces microvascular leakage by inhibiting endothelial gap formation. Am J Physiol 1994;266:L461-L468. [Free Full Text]
  30. Kallstrom BL, Sjoberg J, Waldeck B. The interaction between salmeterol and beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists with higher efficacy on guinea-pig trachea and human bronchus in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 1994;113:687-692. [Medline]
  31. Britton MG, Earnshaw JS, Palmer JBD. A twelve month comparison of salmeterol with salbutamol in asthmatic patients. Eur Respir J 1992;5:1062-1067. [Erratum, Eur Respir J 1993;6:150.] [Abstract]
  32. Kesten S, Chapman KR, Broder I, et al. Sustained improvement in asthma with long-term use of formoterol fumarate. Ann Allergy 1992;69:415-420. [Medline]
  33. Verberne AAPH, Frost C, Roorda RJ, van der Laag H, Kerrebijn KF, Dutch Paediatric Asthma Study Group. One year treatment with salmeterol compared with beclomethasone in children with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:688-695. [Free Full Text]
  34. Thorsson L, Edsbacker S, Conradson TB. Lung deposition of budesonide from Turbuhaler is twice that from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler P-MDI. Eur Respir J 1994;7:1839-1844. [Abstract]
  35. Borgstrom L, Derom E, Stahl E, Wahlin-Boll E, Pauwels R. The inhalation device influences lung deposition and bronchodilating effect of terbutaline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:1636-1640. [Abstract]
Appendix

The following physicians, listed according to country, enrolled patients: Belgium — W. DeBacker, M. Decramer, P.-M. Mengeot, L. Siemons, J. Verhaert, and W. Vinken; Canada — M. Alexander, J. Bouchard, A. Day, A. Knight, J.-L. Malo, D. Marciniuk, J.G. Martin, S. Peters, B. Sanders, B. Sproule, and D. Stubbing; the Netherlands — A. Baas, T.A. Bantje, J. Creemers, H. Sinninghe Damsté, W. Evers, S. Gans, A. Greefhorst, H. Hassing, F. Maesen, M.J. Möllers, H.R. Pasma, Z. Pelikan, P.E. Postmus, J. Prins, B.M. Santana, M. Schrijver, A.P. Sips, R. Stallaert, L. van der Maas, and A.J. van Harreveld; Israel — J. Greif, D. Heimer, A.H. Rubin, and A. Wollner; Italy — F. Bariffi, F. Bonifazi, V. Brusasco, G. D'Amato, L. Fabbri, C. Franco, L. Gandola, C. Giuntini, E. Gramiccioni, V. Grassi, L. Marazzini, A. Rossi, A.M. Santolicandro, and C. Sturani; Luxembourg — J.-P. Parini; Norway — L. Bjermer and N. Ringdal; Spain — J.L. Alvarez Sala, P.L. Cabrera Navarro, S. Romero, J. Sanchis, V. Sobradillo, and H. Verea; United Kingdom — G. Basran, L.M. Campbell, D. Franklin, G.J. Gibson, R.C. Joshi, A. Knox, A.B. MacLean, R. Scott, R. Smith, A. Tattersfield, and J.P. Vernon. The following Astra employees were involved in the study: C.-A. Bauer (project leader), M. Best (data entry), C. Hultquist (medical advisor), F. Jackson (safety evaluation), A. Lennon (medical coordinator), S. Lindgren (safety evaluation), H. MacFarlane (computing), A. McLean (deputy project leader), M. Nevinson (medical coordinator), M.-Å. Persson (computing), and K. Svensson (statistician). The national medical monitors were: F. Bellemans, T. Ben-Or, S. Bordonaro, M. Chiesa, I. Garcia, J. Haddon, S. Holthe, M. Huybrechts, A. Ning, H. Rijskamp, F. Stafford, and M. van den Dobbelsteen.


 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Effect of Inhaled Formoterol and Budesonide on Exacerbations of Asthma
FitzGerald J. M., Salvi S., Pauwels R. A., Tattersfield A. E., Löfdahl C.-G.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1071-1073, Apr 9, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.