The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correction to van der Horst et al., N Engl J Med 337(1):15-21 July 3, 1997.

Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 337:1557-1558 November 20, 1997 Number 21
NextNext

Treatment of Cryptococcal Meningitis

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by van der Horst, C. M.
-Related Article
 by van der Horst, C. M.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The conclusion of van der Horst et al. (July 3 issue)1 that the combination regimen of higher-dose amphotericin B plus flucytosine, followed by consolidation therapy with oral fluconazole, is safe and effective and should now be considered the treatment of choice for AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis cannot be supported by the study design or the 10-week outcomes. This two-stage design has a significant bias — the healthy-survivor effect — in that only healthy survivors were permitted to enroll in the consolidation phase of the trial. The data analysis does not address the censoring effect of eliminating patients with a poor prognosis from the azole-therapy arms. The clinical and mycologic responses observed at 10 weeks depend on successful clinical completion of step one and enrollment in step two. In an intention-to-treat analysis that included all enrolled eligible patients, 178 of 381 (47 percent) had favorable combined clinical and mycologic responses at 10 weeks. This combined response rate may not differ from that at 10 weeks for amphotericin B used alone (40 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 26 to 53 percent) and may be inferior to rates of success for the combination-therapy regimens of amphotericin B plus flucytosine (100 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, >54 percent) or fluconazole plus flucytosine (63 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 48 to 82 percent).2,3,4 In addition, it appears that there may be a clinically significant difference in outcome at 10 weeks if the cerebrospinal fluid culture obtained at week 2 is negative, not positive. The patients with negative cerebrospinal fluid cultures at week 2 had a >92 percent success rate at 10 weeks, implying a significantly lower response rate for those with positive cultures. Thus, a strategy of changing therapy to an azole at two weeks may be ill advised for those patients not known to have negative cerebrospinal fluid cultures even if they seem clinically improved.


Robert A. Larsen, M.D.
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA 90033

References

  1. van der Horst CM, Saag MS, Cloud GA, et al. Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1997;337:15-21. [Free Full Text]
  2. Saag MS, Powderly WG, Cloud GA, et al. Comparison of amphotericin B with fluconazole in the treatment of acute AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 1992;326:83-89. [Abstract]
  3. Larsen RA, Leal MA, Chan LS. Fluconazole compared with amphotericin B plus flucytosine for cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:183-187.
  4. Larsen RA, Bozzette SA, Jones BE, et al. Fluconazole combined with flucytosine for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 1994;19:741-745. [Medline]

 
To the Editor: In the report by van der Horst et al., much weight is given to a higher rate of negative cerebrospinal fluid cultures at two weeks in the flucytosine arm. In order to judge the importance of this finding, it is necessary to determine its clinical significance. Did patients with positive cerebrospinal fluid cultures at week 2 fare any worse during follow-up? Is there a difference in rates of later relapse or mortality among patients with successful clinical outcomes between those with positive and those with negative cultures? Did patients with positive cultures at week 2 also have poor cerebrospinal fluid cryptococcal-antigen responses as compared with base line? A change in the level of antigen in the cerebrospinal fluid has been correlated with response and relapse in previous studies.1 . . .

Of the 14 patients who died and had cerebrospinal fluid opening pressures recorded, 13 had elevated pressures at their last lumbar puncture. We might expect that patients dying of cryptococcal meningitis would have increased cerebrospinal fluid pressures as their conditions deteriorated. How many patients were known to have high opening pressures at base line? Was a high base-line opening pressure predictive of mortality or clinical failure in the group as a whole?


Barry S. Zingman, M.D.
Montefiore Medical Center
Bronx, NY 10467

References

  1. Powderly WG, Cloud GA, Dismukes WE, Saag MS. Measurement of cryptococcal antigen in serum and cerebrospinal fluid: value in the management of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18:789-792. [Medline]

 
The authors reply:

To the Editor: Dr. Larsen expresses concern about our study design and a potential bias effect on the outcome. There is no important bias from a "healthy-survivor effect" in our study. Of the 381 patients who participated in step one, 42 (11 percent) reached the study end point or were not eligible for step two. Among the other 33 patients not continuing on to step two, 21 withdrew voluntarily and 12 were excluded because of concomitant medications. Even if all 33 of these patients were deemed "unhealthy" survivors, 80 percent of our step-one patients advanced to step two, and 30 percent had positive cultures at the end of week 2.

Dr. Larsen's extrapolation of our 2-week results to reflect 10-week results and his comparison with previous studies are inappropriate. Of the 306 patients randomly assigned to consolidation therapy, 57 percent were nonresponders (composite response) at 2 weeks, but 65 percent of these showed a composite response at 10 weeks. Thus, Dr. Larsen's assumption that no patients responded to consolidation with azole therapy is incorrect. In addition, the intention-to-treat design of our study required a negative cerebrospinal fluid culture at week 10 for success; if a cerebrospinal fluid culture was not obtained from a patient the treatment was judged a mycologic failure in that patient. Of the 306 step-two patients, 83 did not have week-10 cultures, and the treatment was therefore classified as a failure in those patients. The overall composite response at week 10 was at least 45 percent, and the overall clinical response rate was 69 percent. Moreover, our two-week survival rate of 5.5 percent was strikingly low. Dr. Larsen also alludes to a study with a success rate of 100 percent among patients receiving amphotericin B plus flucytosine.1 These results were obtained in a small cohort of six patients who had normal mental status at base line (low risk for progression). In another small, nonrandomized trial, the use of flucytosine plus fluconazole did indeed achieve a 63 percent "success" rate; however, serious toxicity occurred in 62 percent of the participants, and 28 percent had to stop therapy because of severe toxicity.2 Accordingly, we believe that our conclusion is justified: Higher-dose amphotericin B plus flucytosine followed by consolidation with oral fluconazole should now be considered the treatment of choice for AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis.

With respect to Dr. Larsen's final point and to Dr. Zingman's letter, the patients who had positive cultures at week 2 did indeed have a higher risk of positive cultures at week 10. However, there was no difference in long-term outcome with regard to relapse or survival based on a positive culture at week 2. Moreover, in a separate study of maintenance therapy, the relapse rate over a period of 12 months among patients who received flucytosine plus amphotericin B during the first 2 weeks of therapy was significantly lower than the rate in patients who did not receive flucytosine.3 With regard to Dr. Zingman's last point, elevated base-line cerebrospinal fluid opening pressures did predict mortality; however, elevated pressure was not associated with mycologic failure or relapse.

There was an error in our published report, on page 18, in the first sentence under the heading "Deaths." It should have read, "During step one, 21 patients (5.5 percent) died: 11 of 179 in the amphotericin B group and 10 of 202 in the combination group. . . ."


Michael S. Saag, M.D.
Gretchen A. Cloud, M.S.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, AL 35294-2050


Charles van der Horst, M.D.
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7030

References

  1. Larsen RA, Leal MA, Chan LS. Fluconazole compared with amphotericin B plus flucytosine for cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:183-187.
  2. Larsen RA, Bozzette SA, Jones BE, et al. Fluconazole combined with flucytosine for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 1994;19:741-745.
  3. Saag MS, Cloud GA, Graybill JR, et al. Comparison of fluconazole (FLU) versus itraconazole (ITRA) as maintenance therapy of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis (CM). In: Program and abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, September 17–20, 1995. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:1217.

 


 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by van der Horst, C. M.
-Related Article
 by van der Horst, C. M.
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.