The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 337:1785-1791 December 18, 1997 Number 25
NextNext

Preoperative Amiodarone as Prophylaxis against Atrial Fibrillation after Heart Surgery
Emile G. Daoud, M.D., S. Adam Strickberger, M.D., K. Ching Man, D.O., Rajiva Goyal, M.D., G. Michael Deeb, M.D., Steven F. Bolling, M.D., Francis D. Pagani, M.D., Cynthia Bitar, R.N., Marc D. Meissner, M.D., and Fred Morady, M.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Atrial fibrillation occurs commonly after open-heart surgery and may delay hospital discharge. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of preoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.

Methods In this double-blind, randomized study, 124 patients were given either oral amiodarone (64 patients) or placebo (60 patients) for a minimum of seven days before elective cardiac surgery. Therapy consisted of 600 mg of amiodarone per day for seven days, then 200 mg per day until the day of discharge from the hospital. The mean (±SD) preoperative total dose of amiodarone was 4.8±0.96 g over a period of 13 ± 7 days.

Results Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in 16 of the 64 patients in the amiodarone group (25 percent) and 32 of the 60 patients in the placebo group (53 percent) (P = 0.003). Patients in the amiodarone group were hospitalized for significantly fewer days than were patients in the placebo group (6.5 ± 2.6 vs. 7.9 ± 4.3 days, P = 0.04). Nonfatal postoperative complications occurred in eight amiodarone-treated patients (12 percent) and in six patients receiving placebo (10 percent, P = 0.78). Fatal postoperative complications occurred in three patients who received amiodarone (5 percent) and in two who received placebo (3 percent, P = 1.00). Total hospitalization costs were significantly less for the amiodarone group than for the placebo group ($18,375±$13,863 vs. $26,491±$23,837, P = 0.03).

Conclusions Preoperative oral amiodarone in patients undergoing complex cardiac surgery is well tolerated and significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and the duration and cost of hospitalization.


Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 10 to 40 percent of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 Although prophylactic therapy with beta-adrenergic blockers reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation,8,11,13,14,15,16,17 this arrhythmia remains an important cause of increased hospital stays and expenses after heart surgery.18 Amiodarone is a class III antiarrhythmic drug that is effective for atrial fibrillation19,20,21,22,23,24,25 and that can be begun safely on an outpatient basis in patients with structural heart disease.26,27 The purpose of this study was to assess the use of oral amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery.

Methods

Patient Population

From June 1, 1995, to September 30, 1996, 373 patients for whom cardiac surgery was scheduled at least one week in advance were screened in the cardiac-surgery clinics of the University of Michigan Hospital and Harper Hospital for participation in this study. To be included, patients had to give informed consent, be more than 18 years old, be scheduled for elective heart surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, have at least one week before surgery was scheduled, and have normal sinus rhythm. Patients were excluded if they were allergic to amiodarone; had used amiodarone within four months of enrollment; had a history of amiodarone toxicity; had participated in another investigational protocol; required the use of antiarrhythmic therapy other than beta-receptor antagonists, calcium-channel antagonists, or digitalis; had untreated thyroid disease; had serum aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase concentrations four times the upper limit of normal; were pregnant; had a resting heart rate of less than 50 beats per minute in the absence of medical therapy known to slow the sinus rate; or had uncontrolled heart failure. One hundred forty-five patients (39 percent) were excluded because they had participated in another investigational protocol (77 patients), had chronic atrial fibrillation (33), used antiarrhythmic medication (13), had resting heart rates of less than 50 beats per minute (11), were less than 18 years old (5), had untreated thyroid disease (2), had uncontrolled heart failure (2), or had an elevated aspartate aminotransferase concentration (2). Among the remaining 228 eligible patients, 131 (57 percent) consented. Surgery was canceled for seven patients after randomization, however, and these patients were not included in the study. Therefore, 124 patients (118 at the University of Michigan Hospital and 6 at Harper Hospital) were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to either oral amiodarone (64 patients) or placebo (60 patients). The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the patients who received amiodarone and those who received placebo.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the Patients.

 
Study Protocol

The study protocol was approved by the University of Michigan and Harper Hospital human-research committees. The patients were interviewed on the day of their initial evaluations in the cardiac-surgery outpatient clinic. The patients who consented were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to begin oral therapy on the same day. Patients were enrolled a mean (±SD) of 13±7 days before surgery. Amiodarone (Cordarone, Wyeth–Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia) was prescribed at a dosage of one tablet (200 mg) three times a day for seven days, then one tablet each day while the patient was hospitalized. Amiodarone was discontinued on the day of hospital discharge. The placebo tablets were identical in appearance to the amiodarone tablets. For the patients being treated with digitalis or warfarin, the doses of these drugs were halved, and the prothrombin time was measured one week later. Other medical therapy was unchanged. Outpatient compliance was monitored by pill count and was 96 percent. To screen for outpatient complications, a telephone interview was conducted with each patient one week after enrollment.

The patients were hospitalized on the day of surgery. All patients were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass. Coronary-artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 52 patients (42 percent), valvular surgery in 41 (33 percent), both coronary-artery bypass and valvular surgery in 22 (18 percent), and other surgical procedures in 9 (7 percent). Myocardial protection was provided by cold cardioplegia in 116 patients and retrograde perfusion in 8 patients.

After surgery, each patient was admitted to an intensive care unit and was subsequently transferred to a monitored unit. An investigator evaluated the patients daily. Three-lead telemetric monitoring (Marquette Series 7500, Milwaukee) was performed continuously for a mean of 7.2±3.6 days after surgery. The electrocardiographic data were stored for 24 hours and reviewed on a daily basis. An episode of atrial fibrillation was counted if it persisted for more than five minutes. Management of atrial fibrillation was directed by the cardiac-surgery team.

The study agent was discontinued on the day of hospital discharge. A home-nurse evaluation was performed 7±2 days after the patients were discharged and included measurements of vital signs in all the patients and single-lead electrocardiography in 84 patients (68 percent). At the routine postdischarge evaluation in the cardiac-surgery clinic, a 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded, and patients were queried about intercurrent hospitalizations or emergency-room evaluations. These medical records were reviewed by an investigator.

Cost Data

Data on hospitalization costs for the study population were provided through the use of a commercially available decision-support information software system (Model 204, Transition Systems, Boston), operated by the University of Michigan Budget Office. These data represent the sum of variable direct costs, fixed direct costs, and indirect costs. Professional-service fees were not included in these costs. Cost data were collected for 114 patients (58 given placebo and 56 given amiodarone) who underwent surgery at the University of Michigan and were hospitalized no more than 21 days from the day of surgery. The cost of amiodarone therapy was estimated at $2.61 per tablet.28

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. Continuous variables were expressed as means ±SD. Continuous variables were compared by means of Student's t-test, and categorical variables were compared by Fisher's exact test. Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test was used to compare the probability of atrial fibrillation in the amiodarone and placebo groups. After an episode of atrial fibrillation or after the postdischarge clinic evaluation, the patient was withdrawn from further analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Outpatient Therapy and Surgical Data

The mean number of preoperative days of therapy was significantly greater for the patients randomly assigned to receive placebo (15.0±8.7) than for those randomly assigned to receive amiodarone (12.0±5.0, P = 0.02). The mean total outpatient amiodarone dose was 4.8±0.96 g (median, 5.0; range, 0.6 to 7.0). Except for two patients who elected to stop outpatient therapy because of minor gastrointestinal side effects (one receiving placebo and one receiving amiodarone, P = 1.00), no patients had side effects or adverse reactions during outpatient therapy. There was no significant change in the serum concentration of aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase on the day of surgery as compared with the day of enrollment in either group (Table 2).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Surgical and Postoperative Clinical Data.

 
Other than fewer defibrillations per patient to restore sinus rhythm after release of the aortic cross-clamp in the amiodarone group, there were no significant differences in surgical data between the amiodarone and placebo groups (Table 2).

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

The percentages of patients remaining free of atrial fibrillation in the amiodarone and placebo groups are shown in Figure 1. When episodes of atrial fibrillation that occurred during and after hospitalization are considered, the incidence of atrial fibrillation was 25 percent (16 of 64 patients) in the amiodarone group and 53 percent (32 of 60 patients) in the placebo group (P = 0.003).


View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier Analysis of the Percentages of Patients Remaining Free of Atrial Fibrillation after Surgery in the Amiodarone and Placebo Groups.

The asterisks indicate the mean days of hospital discharge.

 
The prevalence of atrial fibrillation occurring during hospitalization in the amiodarone group was 23 percent (15 of 64 patients), as compared with 42 percent (25 of 60 patients) in the placebo group (P = 0.03). Atrial fibrillation occurred a mean of 2.5±1.7 days after surgery in the patients assigned to amiodarone and 2.7±1.6 days after surgery in the patients assigned to placebo (P = 0.79). The maximal ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the amiodarone group than in the placebo group (112±21 vs. 135±31 beats per minute, P = 0.03); however, there was no significant difference between the groups in the duration of atrial fibrillation (13.8±13.4 vs. 9.3±10.3 hours, P = 0.27 by Student's t-test) (Table 3).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Duration of Atrial Fibrillation.

 
Symptoms attributable to atrial fibrillation were reported by 13 of 15 patients (87 percent) in the amiodarone group and 21 of 25 patients (84 percent) in the placebo group (P = 1.00). Atrial fibrillation was initially managed by an antiarrhythmic medication in 10 patients (67 percent) assigned to amiodarone and in 14 patients (56 percent) assigned to placebo (P = 0.74). Spontaneous conversion without antiarrhythmic medication occurred in five patients receiving amiodarone (33 percent) and in nine receiving placebo (36 percent, P = 1.00). Electrical cardioversion was performed on no patients in the amiodarone group and two in the placebo group (13 percent, P = 0.52).

Patients were evaluated 7±2 days after hospital discharge by a home nurse and at 24±9 days in the cardiac-surgery outpatient clinic. Sinus rhythm was present in each patient at the home-nurse visit and the outpatient-clinic visit. After discharge from the hospital, 7 patients who had received amiodarone (14 percent) and 11 who had received placebo (31 percent) were evaluated for acute symptoms by their physicians (P = 0.10). Atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in one patient who had received amiodarone (2 percent) and seven patients who had received placebo (12 percent, P = 0.03) a mean of 12±5 days after discharge. The medical therapy at the time of these episodes of atrial fibrillation is summarized in Table 4.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Medical Therapy When Episodes of Atrial Fibrillation Occurred after Hospital Discharge.

 
The use of beta-blockers did not influence the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in either study group. In the placebo group, the incidence of atrial fibrillation was 61 percent (11 of 18 patients) among the patients receiving beta-blockers and 33 percent (14 of 42 patients) among those not receiving beta-blockers (P = 0.09). The incidence of atrial fibrillation among the amiodarone-treated patients receiving beta-blockers (27 percent [7 of 26]) was not significantly different from that among the amiodarone-treated patients not receiving beta-blockers (21 percent [8 of 38], P = 0.76).

The incidence of atrial fibrillation was significantly higher among patients who had valvular surgery (46 percent [33 of 71]) than among patients who underwent only coronary-artery bypass surgery (29 percent [15 of 52], P = 0.04).

Length of Hospital Stay and Total Costs

The patients in the amiodarone group were hospitalized for significantly fewer days than those in the placebo group (6.5 ±2.6 vs. 7.9±4.3 days, P = 0.04). In the amiodarone group, the mean length of stay was 7.9±4.6 days for the patients with atrial fibrillation and 6.1±1.3 days for those without atrial fibrillation (P = 0.02). In the placebo group, the patients with episodes of atrial fibrillation were also hospitalized for significantly more days (9.4±3.6 vs. 6.8±4.5 days, P = 0.02). The mean total cost of hospitalization for the amiodarone group was $18,375±$13,863, as compared with $26,491±$23,837 for the placebo group (P=0.03).

Morbidity and Mortality in the Hospital

There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative complications between the amiodarone and placebo groups (P = 0.12) (Table 5). Postoperative complications occurred in 19 patients (8 in the placebo group and 11 in the amiodarone group, P = 0.62). Six patients in the placebo group and eight in the amiodarone group had major morbidity (P = 0.78) (Table 6). Death occurred in two patients assigned to placebo (3 percent) and in three patients assigned to amiodarone (5 percent, P = 1.00) (Table 6).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Intraoperative Complications.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Postoperative Major Morbidity and Mortality.

 
When both intraoperative and postoperative events were considered, malignant ventricular arrhythmias occurred in five patients in the placebo group (8 percent) and one in the amiodarone group (2 percent, P = 0.11).

Discussion

Main Findings

The use of prophylactic oral amiodarone for at least one week before elective heart surgery reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation by approximately 50 percent, significantly reduced the length and total cost of hospitalization, and reduced the number of symptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation occurring after discharge. Amiodarone was well tolerated and did not increase the risk of intraoperative or postoperative complications. Amiodarone therapy was not associated with proarrhythmia or serious adverse reactions, even among patients with severe coronary and valvular heart disease. Among the patients who did have atrial fibrillation, amiodarone reduced the ventricular rate more significantly than did placebo.

In this study, unlike previous ones that included only patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass graft surgery, 57 percent of the population had valvular surgery. Valvular surgery was associated with a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation, which probably explains the high incidence of atrial fibrillation in the placebo group. This study's heterogeneous population highlights the efficacy of amiodarone for patients undergoing not only bypass but also valvular surgery.

Complications of Outpatient and Inpatient Therapy

Noncardiac toxic effects of amiodarone include dose-related and non–dose-related effects.29,30 The low-dose amiodarone regimen used in this study did not result in important side effects, and there were no complications related to outpatient adjustment of digitalis or warfarin dosages. Also, in this study, unlike previous ones,31,32,33 there were no acute pulmonary toxic effects after surgery in the patients randomly assigned to amiodarone.

Cardiac toxicity due to amiodarone is uncommon.19,20,21,22,23,24,25 The incidence of amiodarone-induced ventricular proarrhythmia is low,25 even in the setting of structural heart disease.34 Furthermore, amiodarone has little or no negative inotropic effect, rarely exacerbates heart failure, and can reduce congestive symptoms.35 In this study, the low complication rate in the amiodarone group confirms the results of other studies that have demonstrated safe initiation of amiodarone treatment in outpatients with coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure.26,27

Complications Occurring after Hospitalization

Although the assigned medical therapy was discontinued on the day of discharge, the incidence of atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the amiodarone group than in the placebo group during the period immediately following discharge. The half-life of amiodarone is 13 to 103 days.36 It is likely that the lower incidence of atrial fibrillation after discharge in the amiodarone group is attributable to a persistent antiarrhythmic effect.

Hospitalization Costs

Unlike previous trials of prophylaxis against postoperative atrial fibrillation, this study demonstrated a reduction in the total cost of hospitalization for the patients assigned to amiodarone therapy. These data probably underestimate the cost savings attributable to amiodarone therapy, because professional fees were not included in the cost analysis and cost data for only the initial hospitalization were examined. Atrial fibrillation after discharge was more frequent in the placebo group, and hospitalization costs related to the management of these episodes of atrial fibrillation were not analyzed.

Previous Studies

Hohnloser et al. performed a placebo-controlled study of intravenous amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation occurring after heart surgery in 77 patients.37 The total intravenous dose — 4.5 g — was similar to the total outpatient dose of amiodarone in our study. The amiodarone infusion began after the completion of the surgical procedure and significantly reduced the incidence of atrial fibrillation. However, electrocardiographic monitoring was performed only during the first 48 hours after surgery, and amiodarone was discontinued in 18 percent of patients because of side effects.

Some clinical trials using beta-adrenergic antagonists have demonstrated prophylactic benefit against postoperative atrial fibrillation8,11,13,14,15,16,17; other studies, however, came to conflicting conclusions.38,39,40 A possible reason for this difference may be that in some studies, patients randomly assigned to placebo were treated with beta-adrenergic blockers until the time of surgery.41 Therefore, these patients may have experienced beta-blocker withdrawal, which is associated with an increase in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.11,42,43 A second drawback of the studies investigating prophylactic beta-blocker therapy is the exclusion criteria. In most trials, the factors calling for exclusion have included a history of asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease, or diabetes mellitus requiring medical therapy; the presence of a left ventricular aneurysm; the fact that concomitant or primary valvular surgery was to be performed; and the presence of congestive heart failure. These characteristics requiring exclusion are common among patients undergoing cardiac surgery and limit the clinical utility of prophylaxis with beta-blockers.11,18

Prophylactic oral amiodarone circumvents some of the limitations of intravenous amiodarone and beta-adrenergic antagonists. Short-term low-dose oral amiodarone is not associated with the complications of intravenous administration. Also, because it is well tolerated in patients with poor left ventricular function and unlikely to exacerbate preexisting medical conditions, prophylactic low-dose oral amiodarone can be used for patients who are not candidates for beta-blockade.

Limitations of the Study

A limitation of this study is that Holter monitoring was not performed to screen for postoperative atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias during outpatient therapy. The primary goal of the study, however, was to address the clinical utility of prophylactic oral amiodarone. Failure to detect brief, asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation or asymptomatic arrhythmias was unlikely to influence patient care or affect it adversely and does not detract from the clinical implications of this study.

A second limitation is that the management of atrial fibrillation was directed by the attending cardiac surgeon. It is possible that a uniform protocol of atrial-fibrillation management might have reduced the length of hospital stay; however, since randomization was blinded, it is improbable that the longer average hospital stay in the placebo group was attributable to a more protracted treatment regimen for atrial fibrillation.

Clinical Implications

Prophylactic low-dose oral amiodarone used in patients undergoing open-heart surgery was well tolerated and significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, as well as the length and cost of hospitalization. Furthermore, unlike class I or other class III antiarrhythmic agents, oral amiodarone was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events, particularly ventricular proarrhythmia. A primary limitation to the widespread use of oral amiodarone prophylaxis, however, is the requirement of a seven-day preoperative treatment period. Whether an accelerated loading regimen of amiodarone over a period of one to two days before surgery might be effective and safe in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation remains to be determined.

Supported in part by a grant from Wyeth–Ayerst Laboratories.


Source Information

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine (E.G.D., S.A.S., K.C.M., R.G., C.B., F.M.), and the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (G.M.D., S.F.B., F.D.P.), University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor; and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harper Hospital, Wayne State University, Detroit (M.D.M.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Daoud at the Midwest Cardiology Research Foundation, Riverside Methodist Hospital, 3545 Olentangy Rd., Rm. 325, Columbus, OH 43214.

References

  1. Fuller JA, Adams GG, Buxton B. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: is it a disorder of the elderly? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:821-825. [Abstract]
  2. Michelson EL, Morganroth J, MacVaugh H III. Postoperative arrhythmias after coronary artery and cardiac valvular surgery detected by long-term electrocardiographic monitoring. Am Heart J 1979;97:442-448. [CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ormerod OJM, McGregor CGA, Stone DL, Wisbey C, Petch MC. Arrhythmias after coronary bypass surgery. Br Heart J 1984;51:618-621. [Free Full Text]
  4. Leitch JW, Thomson D, Baird DK, Harris PJ. The importance of age as a predictor of atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:338-342. [Abstract]
  5. Lauer MS, Eagle KA, Buckley MJ, DeSanctis RW. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass surgery. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1989;31:367-378. [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Caretta Q, Mercanti CA, De Nardo D, et al. Ventricular conduction defects and atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: multivariate analysis of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables. Eur Heart J 1991;12:1107-1111. [Free Full Text]
  7. Crosby LH, Pifalo WB, Woll KR, Burkholder JA. Risk factors for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:1520-1522. [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Rubin DA, Nieminski KE, Reed GE, Herman MV. Predictors, prevention, and long-term prognosis of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:331-335. [Abstract]
  9. Yousif H, Davies G, Oakley CM. Peri-operative supraventricular arrhythmias in coronary bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol 1990;26:313-318. [CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Parikka H, Toivonen L, Pellinen T, Verkkala K, Jarvinen A, Neiminen MS. The influence of intravenous magnesium sulphate on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery by-pass operation. Eur Heart J 1993;14:251-258. [Free Full Text]
  11. White HD, Antman EM, Glynn MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of timolol for prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1984;70:479-484. [Free Full Text]
  12. Johnson LW, Dickstein RA, Fruehan CT, et al. Prophylactic digitalization for coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1976;53:819-822. [Free Full Text]
  13. Daudon P, Corcos T, Gandjbakhch I, Levasseur JP, Cabrol A, Cabrol C. Prevention of atrial fibrillation or flutter by acebutolol after coronary bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:933-936. [CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Lamb RK, Prabhakar G, Thorpe JAC, Smith S, Norton R, Dyde JA. The use of atenolol in the prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias following coronary artery surgery. Eur Heart J 1988;9:32-36. [Free Full Text]
  15. Janssen J, Loomans L, Harink J, et al. Prevention and treatment of supraventricular tachycardia shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized open trial. Angiology 1986;37:601-609.
  16. Suttorp MJ, Kingma JH, Tjon Joe Gin RM, et al. Efficacy and safety of low- and high-dose sotalol versus propranolol in the prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias early after coronary artery bypass operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:921-926. [Abstract]
  17. Nystrom U, Edvardsson N, Berggren H, Pizzarelli GP, Radegran K. Oral sotalol reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;41:34-37. [Medline]
  18. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation 1996;94:390-397. [Free Full Text]
  19. Brodsky MA, Allen BJ, Walker CJ III, Casey TP, Luckett CR, Henry WL. Amiodarone for maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation in the setting of a dilated left atrium. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:572-575. [CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Gold RL, Haffajee CI, Charos G, Sloan K, Baker S, Alpert JS. Amiodarone for refractory atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:124-127. [CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Chun S, Sager P, Stevenson W, Nademanee K, Middlekauff H, Singh B. Amiodarone is highly effective in maintaining NSR in refractory atrial fibrillation/flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:203A-203A. 
  22. Horowitz LN, Spielman SR, Greenspan AM, et al. Use of amiodarone in the treatment of persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation resistant to quinidine therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:1402-1407. [Abstract]
  23. Blevins RD, Kerin NZ, Benaderet D, et al. Amiodarone in the management of refractory atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1401-1404. [Abstract]
  24. Gosselink ATM, Crijns HJGM, Van Gelder IC, Hillige H, Wiesfeld ACP, Lie KI. Low-dose amiodarone for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter. JAMA 1992;267:3289-3293. [Abstract]
  25. Middlekauff HR, Wiener I, Stevenson WG. Low-dose amiodarone for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:75F-81F. [CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Nicklas JM, McKenna WJ, Stewart RA, et al. Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low-dose amiodarone in patients with severe heart failure and asymptomatic frequent ventricular ectopy. Am Heart J 1991;122:1016-1021. [CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Levy S, Lauribe P, Dolla E, et al. A randomized comparison of external and internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1992;86:1415-1420. [Free Full Text]
  28. Red book update: issue 29. Montvale, N.J.: Medical Economics, 1997:16.
  29. Harris L, McKenna WJ, Rowland E, Holt DW, Story GC, Krikler DM. Side effects of long-term amiodarone therapy. Circulation 1983;67:45-51. [Free Full Text]
  30. Naccarelli GV, Rinkenberger RL, Dougherty AH, Giebel RA. Amiodarone: pharmacology and antiarrhythmic and adverse effects. Pharmacotherapy 1985;5:298-313. [Medline]
  31. Van Mieghem W, Coolen L, Malysse I, Lacquet LM, Deneffe GJ, Demedts MG. Amiodarone and the development of ARDS after lung surgery. Chest 1994;105:1642-1645. [Free Full Text]
  32. Kay GN, Epstein AE, Kirklin JK, Diethelm AG, Graybar G, Plumb VJ. Fatal postoperative amiodarone pulmonary toxicity. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:490-492. [CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Greenspon AJ, Kidwell GA, Hurley W, Mannion J. Amiodarone-related postoperative adult respiratory distress syndrome. Circulation 1991;84:Suppl III:III-407. 
  34. Mason JW. Amiodarone. N Engl J Med 1987;316:455-466. [Medline]
  35. Hamer AWF, Arkles LB, Johns JA. Beneficial effects of low dose amiodarone in patients with congestive cardiac failure: a placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:1768-1774. [Abstract]
  36. Hondeghem LM. Class III agents: amiodarone, bretylium, and sotalol. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac electrophysiology: from cell to bedside. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1995:1330-6.
  37. Hohnloser SH, Meinertz T, Dammbacher T, et al. Electrocardiographic and antiarrhythmic effects of intravenous amiodarone: results of a prospective, placebo-controlled study. Am Heart J 1991;121:89-95. [CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Ivey MF, Ivey TD, Bailey WW, Williams DB, Hessel EA II, Miller DW Jr. Influence of propranolol on supraventricular tachycardia early after coronary artery revascularization: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;85:214-218. [Abstract]
  39. Martinussen HJ, Lolk A, Szczepanski C, Alstrup P. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary bypass surgery -- a double-blind randomized trial of prophylactic low dose propranolol. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;36:206-207. [Medline]
  40. Shafei H, Nashef SA, Turner MA, Bain WH. Does low-dose propranolol reduce the incidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias following myocardial revascularization? A clinical study. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;36:202-205. [Medline]
  41. Frost L, Molgaard H, Christiansen EH, Hjortholm K, Paulsen PK, Thomsen PE. Atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass surgery: epidemiology, risk factors and preventive trials. Int J Cardiol 1992;36:253-261. [CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Abel RM, Van Gelder H, Pores IH, Liguori J, Gielchinsky I, Parsonnet V. Continued propranolol administration following coronary bypass surgery: antiarrhythmic effects. Arch Surg 1983;118:727-731. [Abstract]
  43. Silverman NA, Wright R, Levitsky S. Efficacy of low-dose propranolol in preventing postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg 1982;196:194-197. [Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Amiodarone Prophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery
McCullough P. A., Redle J. D., Zaman A. G., Archbold A., Alamgir F., Ulahannan T. J., Daoud E. G., Morady F.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1383-1384, May 7, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.