|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel Abramowicz, M.D.
Hôpital Erasme
1070 Brussels, Belgium
References
To the Editor: The lower overall rate of rejection in our trial is most likely due to multiple factors.1 The mean daily doses and the mean trough blood concentrations of cyclosporine in the placebo and daclizumab groups were higher than those in the basiliximab trial. Transplant recipients in the United States are more heterogeneous than in Europe; for example, 37 percent of the patients in the daclizumab trial were not white, as compared with 5 percent in the basiliximab trial. This heterogeneity has led most U.S. transplantation physicians to maintain higher trough blood cyclosporine concentrations in their patients and to give a third immunosuppressive drug (azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) in order to achieve effective immunosuppression.
Another factor that may affect the overall rate of rejection is the incidence of delayed graft function. In our study, 7 percent of patients required dialysis because of delayed graft function. The corresponding figure is not reported in the basiliximab trial. The most important message of both trials, however, is that inhibiting the amplification of the immune response to the allograft by blocking the interleukin-2 receptor reduces the frequency of acute rejection after renal transplantation.
The name of B. Kiberd was misspelled in the Appendix. We should have noted that Drs. Vincenti, Kirkman, Pescovitz, and Burdick have served as consultants to HoffmannLaRoche.
Flavio Vincenti, M.D.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, CA 94143-0116
for the Daclizumab Triple Therapy Study Group
References
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |