The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 338:147-152 January 15, 1998 Number 3
NextNext

Prepregnancy Weight and the Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
Sven Cnattingius, M.D., Ph.D., Reinhold Bergström, Ph.D., Loren Lipworth, Sc.D., and Michael S. Kramer, M.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Wolfe, H.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Obesity before pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of several adverse outcomes of pregnancy. The risk profiles among lean, normal, or mildly overweight women are not, however, well established.

Methods We studied the associations between prepregnancy body-mass index (defined as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) and the frequency of late fetal death, early neonatal death, preterm delivery, and delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant in a population-based cohort of 167,750 women in Sweden in 1992 and 1993. The women were categorized as follows, according to body-mass index: lean, less than 20.0; normal, 20.0 through 24.9; overweight, 25.0 through 29.9; and obese, 30.0 or more. The estimates were adjusted for maternal age, parity, smoking, education, whether the mother was living with the father, and maternal height.

Results Among nulliparous women, the odds ratios for late fetal death were increased among women with higher body-mass indexes as compared with lean women, as follows: normal women, 2.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.1); overweight women, 3.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 6.2); and obese women, 4.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.0 to 9.3). Among parous women, only obese women had a significant increase in the risk of late fetal death (odds ratio, 2.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.3). Among nulliparous women, the risk of very preterm delivery (at <32 weeks' gestation) was significantly increased among obese as compared with lean women (odds ratio, 1.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3), whereas among parous women, the risk was highest among those who were lean. The risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant decreased more with increasing body-mass index among parous than among nulliparous women.

Conclusions Higher maternal weight before pregnancy increases the risk of late fetal death, although it protects against the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant.


Obesity before pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of fetal macrosomia and perinatal mortality.1,2,3 The mother's being leaner than average (underweight), on the other hand, is associated with an increased risk of delivering an infant who is small for gestational age and perhaps also the risk of preterm delivery.3,4,5,6 Pregnancies among underweight or overweight women are therefore often regarded as high-risk pregnancies, and thin women are frequently advised to gain weight before becoming pregnant.7,8 Nonetheless, the optimal weight or body-mass index for women who wish to become pregnant is not known.7,8,9

The Swedish Medical Birth Register covers virtually all births in Sweden and includes prospectively collected data on maternal characteristics and complications during pregnancy, delivery, and the neonatal period. Using this data set, and adjusting for potentially confounding factors, we studied the effect of the prepregnancy body-mass index (defined as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) on the risk of late fetal death, early neonatal death, preterm delivery, and delivery of an infant who was small for gestational age.

Methods

For the years 1992 and 1993, the birth register recorded the births of 204,555 singleton infants to women who were themselves born in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, or Iceland. The final study population included 167,750 women for whom information on prepregnancy body-mass index was available.

In Sweden, maternal characteristics are recorded in a standardized manner at the first visit for antenatal care, which occurs before the 15th week of gestation in more than 95 percent of the pregnancies. Maternal height and prepregnancy weight are recorded by recall in centimeters and kilograms, respectively, and used to calculate the prepregnancy body-mass index. We used the body-mass index to characterize women as lean (body-mass index, less than 20.0), normal (20.0 through 24.9), overweight (25.0 through 29.9), or obese (30.0 or more). Maternal smoking was categorized as no daily smoking, 1 to 9 cigarettes per day, or 10 or more cigarettes per day. Also recorded was whether the woman was living with the father. Information on the mother's years of formal education was obtained through linkage to another population-based register. Total maternal weight gain during pregnancy was recorded on admission to the delivery ward. Weight gain per completed week of gestation was calculated and used in this analysis.

Information about maternal age, parity, and complications during pregnancy or delivery was obtained from records routinely filled out when the woman was discharged from the hospital. Maternal age was defined as age in completed years at the time of delivery, and parity as the number of previous births, including stillbirths at 28 weeks of gestation or later. Complications during pregnancy and delivery were classified by a physician at the time of hospital discharge, according to the Swedish version of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9).10 For this analysis, we used two groups of diagnoses associated with prepregnancy body-mass index and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes2,3: hypertensive diseases, defined as essential hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia (ICD-9 codes 642A, 642E, 642F, and 642G), and diabetes mellitus, defined as insulin-dependent or non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus present before pregnancy or gestational diabetes (ICD-9 codes 250, 648A, and 648W).

Information about late fetal death, the duration of gestation, birth weight, and the infant's sex was obtained from the standardized pediatric record, routinely filled out immediately after delivery. Information about early neonatal deaths was obtained through linkage of individual records to the population-based Cause of Death Register. Late fetal death was defined as stillbirth occurring at 28 or more completed weeks of gestation, and early neonatal death as death occurring during the first week after birth. Preterm delivery (i.e., delivery at less than 37 completed weeks of gestation) was classified as very preterm (<32 weeks) or moderately preterm (33 to 36 weeks). Small-for-gestational-age infants were defined as those with birth weights more than 2 SD below the mean birth weight for gestational age, according to a Swedish reference curve.11 Estimated gestational age was based on ultrasound examinations performed routinely at no later than 18 completed weeks of gestation.

Statistical Analysis

We used multiple logistic-regression analysis to evaluate the association between prepregnancy body-mass index and late fetal death, early neonatal death, preterm delivery, and delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant. The estimates were adjusted for maternal age, parity, education, smoking, height, whether the mother was living with the father, and weight gain during pregnancy. We excluded from our analyses women who had missing information on covariates.

Because information on weight gain during pregnancy was missing for 45 percent of the women, we performed a detailed analysis of the effects of adjustment for this variable. Three different models were estimated for each dependent variable. The first was based on the complete data set, without adjustment for weight gain; the second, on the women for whom data on weight gain were available, but without adjustment for weight gain; and the third, on the women with data on weight gain and with adjustment for weight gain. Thus, it was possible to determine whether the inclusion of weight gain in the model altered the effect of body-mass index and whether this alteration was due to changes in the subgroup analyzed or to genuine confounding.

Interactions between body-mass index and parity were assessed by means of a likelihood-ratio test comparing a base-line multivariate model without interaction terms to a model that included terms for the interaction between parity and body-mass index. To facilitate the interpretations of the effects of body-mass index, estimates are presented separately for parous and nulliparous women. Odds ratios were calculated to approximate relative risk and are presented with 95 percent confidence intervals.

Results

The risk of late fetal death increased consistently with increasing prepregnancy body-mass index in the univariate analyses (Table 1). As compared with lean women, overweight and obese women had significantly increased odds ratios for late fetal death. The rates of late fetal death were 1.7 per 1000 among women for whom information about weight gain during pregnancy was available and 4.1 per 1000 among those for whom it was missing (P<0.001); the corresponding rates of early neonatal death were 1.1 and 2.7 per 1000, respectively (P<0.001). When data on weight gain during pregnancy were available, this factor did not influence the risk of late fetal death. Low weight gain (<0.25 kg per week of gestation) was associated with a marginally significant increase in the risk of early neonatal death (Table 1).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Women Delivering Singleton Infants in 1992 and 1993 in Sweden and Univariate Associations with the Risk of Late Fetal Death and Early Neonatal Death.

 
In preliminary multivariate analyses, we found no evidence of confounding of the effect of body-mass index by weight gain during pregnancy. This was true with respect to the adverse outcomes of late fetal death, early neonatal death, and preterm delivery, for which weight gain had little explanatory power, but also with respect to the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant, for which weight gain was an important explanatory variable. Detailed results for the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant are shown in Table 2. After adjustment for weight gain during pregnancy, the effects of body-mass index before pregnancy were unaltered despite the strong association between weight gain and the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant. This finding may be explained by the lack of correlation between prepregnancy body-mass index and weight gain during pregnancy. On the basis of these results, and in order to increase the precision of our analyses, we excluded weight gain during pregnancy from subsequent models.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Adjusted Odds Ratios for the Delivery of a Small-for-Gestational-Age Infant Associated with Prepregnancy Body-Mass Index and Weight Gain during Pregnancy among Women Delivering Live Singleton Infants in Sweden in 1992 and 1993.

 
The risk of late fetal death consistently increased with greater prepregnancy body-mass index (Table 3). As compared with lean women, women with a normal body-mass index and overweight women were at decreased risk of preterm delivery.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Adjusted Odds Ratios for Adverse Outcomes Associated with Prepregnancy Body-Mass Index among Women Delivering Singleton Infants in Sweden in 1992 and 1993.

 
Obese women were more likely than lean women to have 11 years of formal education or less (75 percent vs. 56 percent), to be daily smokers (28 percent vs. 24 percent), and to have diabetes mellitus present before pregnancy or gestational diabetes mellitus (1.1 percent vs. 0.3 percent). The rate of preeclampsia increased with increasing body-mass index, as follows: lean women, 1.8 percent; normal women, 2.5 percent; overweight women, 4.2 percent; and obese women, 7.0 percent. Hypertensive disease was more common among nulliparous women (4.6 percent) than among parous women (1.9 percent) and was a major risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes (data not shown). On the basis of these patterns, we explored possible interactions between body-mass index and parity with respect to adverse pregnancy outcome.

Among nulliparous women, the risk of late fetal death was roughly doubled among women with a normal body-mass index, as compared with lean women, tripled among those who were overweight, and quadrupled among those who were obese (Table 4). Among the parous women, the risk of late fetal death was significantly increased only among the obese women. For early neonatal death, the risk among the nulliparous women was lowest among lean women and was approximately twice as high among women with higher body-mass indexes. Among the parous women, body-mass index did not influence the risk of early neonatal death.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Adjusted Odds Ratios for Late Fetal Death and Early Neonatal Death Associated with Prepregnancy Body-Mass Index among Nulliparous and Parous Women Delivering Singleton Infants in Sweden in 1992 and 1993.

 
Among nulliparous women, the risk of very preterm delivery (at <32 weeks of gestation) was significantly increased for obese women, whereas body-mass index did not significantly influence the risk of moderately preterm delivery (at 33 to 36 weeks) (Table 5). In contrast, among parous women, the risks of very preterm and moderately preterm delivery were lower among normal and overweight women than among lean women. The risk of delivering an infant who was small for gestational age was highest among both the lean nulliparous women and the lean parous women (Table 5), although the decrease in the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant with increasing body-mass index was greater among the parous women.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Adjusted Odds Ratios for Preterm Delivery and Delivery of a Small-for-Gestational-Age Infant Associated with Prepregnancy Body-Mass Index among Nulliparous and Parous Women Delivering Live Singleton Infants in Sweden in 1992 and 1993.

 
The rate of hypertensive disease among nulliparous women consistently increased with body-mass index, from 2.8 percent among the lean women to 10.2 percent among the obese women. Excluding women with hypertensive diseases did not lower the risk of late fetal death associated with increasing body-mass index, whereas the risk of very preterm delivery (at <32 weeks) associated with obesity decreased and was no longer significant after this exclusion (data not shown). Excluding women with diabetes did not change these estimates (data not shown).

Discussion

The results of this large, population-based cohort study suggest that the risk of late fetal death consistently increases with prepregnancy body-mass index among nulliparous women, whereas the risk of early neonatal death is almost doubled among nulliparous women with higher body-mass indexes. The pattern of risk among parous women was different; obesity was associated with late fetal death but not with early neonatal death.

Chance is an unlikely explanation for our findings, because of the large sample and the consistency of our results. Besides the adjustment for possible confounding variables, the relatively homogeneous population of women born in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, or Iceland and the use of standardized records should further minimize the potential for confounding by unmeasured sociodemographic factors or differences in management. Inadequate weight gain has been linked to an increased risk of the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant,6 but its association with other adverse pregnancy outcomes is less certain.12,13,14,15,16 Weight gain during pregnancy is poorly correlated with prepregnancy body-mass index.17 In the present study, low weight gain was above all positively associated with the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant. Caution is advised in interpreting these results, however, because of the large proportion of women with missing information on weight gain during pregnancy.

Preeclampsia is more common among nulliparous than parous women,18 and the rates of preeclampsia increase with increasing maternal weight.19,20 Because preeclampsia may lie on the causal pathway between excessive weight and adverse pregnancy outcomes,18,21 we did not control for hypertensive diseases in the primary multivariate models. When we excluded nulliparous women with hypertensive diseases, however, the risk of very preterm delivery that was associated with higher body-mass index decreased, whereas the corresponding risk of late fetal death did not change.

The biologic mechanisms underlying the association between increasing prepregnancy body-mass index and a greater risk of late fetal death among nulliparous women remain speculative. Thinner women may have healthier habits or may be more able to perceive a decrease in fetal movements. Maternal overweight and obesity are associated with hyperlipidemia, which reduces prostacyclin secretion and enhances peroxidase production, resulting in vasoconstriction and platelet aggregation.20 These changes may increase the risk of preeclampsia, but they probably occur even in the absence of preeclampsia.

Lean mothers, who are often considered to be underweight, have an elevated risk of delivering small-for-gestational-age infants.3,8,22 The association between low maternal body-mass index and preterm delivery is less consistent.12,22,23 In studies in three developed countries, the risks of stillbirth and perinatal or infant death were lowest among infants born to the leanest women,2,13,24 and the rates of preeclampsia are lowest among lean women.19 The collective evidence, although limited, is thus compatible with our findings and suggests that pregnancies among lean women should be regarded as characterized by a low rather than a high risk of adverse outcome and that advising lean women to gain weight before becoming pregnant may not be justified.

From the standpoint of primary prevention, adverse pregnancy outcomes related to overweight may, at least theoretically, be preventable. If women with a body-mass index of 25.0 or more reduced it to 20.0 to 24.9, and thereby reduced their risk of adverse outcomes accordingly, we estimate that the rate of late fetal death would be reduced by 11 percent. If all women with a body-mass index of 20.0 or more reduced it to less than 20.0, the rate of late fetal death would be reduced by 27 percent.

It is important that our results were obtained in a developed country where even lean women are likely to have adequate nutritional stores to meet the basic requirements of pregnancy. These results must not be generalized to developing countries, particularly those in which maternal undernutrition is highly prevalent, nor should they be used to undermine public health efforts to improve prepregnancy and gestational energy intake in areas where the quantity or quality of food is insufficient.

The prevalence of overweight has increased among women in many countries in recent decades.25,26,27,28 In the United States, for example, the prevalence of overweight (body-mass index, >27.8) among women 20 to 29 years of age increased from 12.6 percent in 1971 through 1974 to 20.2 percent in 1988 through 1991.26 In Sweden, the increase of overweight among women has been less prominent, but it is nevertheless indisputable.27 Although these trends are evident in all demographic subgroups, overweight is more common among less well educated women and, in the United States, among black women.25,26,27 Furthermore, the upward trend in the prevalence of overweight is continuing despite its well-publicized adverse effects on health.29,30 Maternal overweight may be one of the most important preventable risk factors for perinatal mortality and could partly explain the socioeconomic differences in the rates of perinatal mortality in developed countries, especially among nulliparous women. Our findings thus provide further justification for the development of effective strategies to reverse the trends toward increasing body weight and a higher prevalence of overweight.

Dr. Kramer is a Distinguished Scientist of the Medical Research Council of Canada.


Source Information

From the Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (S.C., R.B., L.L.); the Department of Statistics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (R.B.); the Department of Community Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York (L.L.); and the Departments of Pediatrics and of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal (M.S.K.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Cnattingius at the Department of Medical Epidemiology, P.O. Box 281, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

References

  1. Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 1987;65:663-737. [Medline]
  2. Naeye RL. Maternal body weight and pregnancy outcome. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:273-279. [Free Full Text]
  3. Wolfe HM, Zador IE, Gross TL, Martier SS, Sokol RJ. The clinical utility of maternal body mass index in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:1306-1310. [Medline]
  4. Kaminski M, Goujard J, Rumeau-Rouquette C. Prediction of low birth weight and prematurity by a multiple regression analysis with maternal characteristics known since the beginning of the pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 1973;2:195-204. [Free Full Text]
  5. Meyer MB, Jonas BS, Tonascia JA. Perinatal events associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:464-476. [Free Full Text]
  6. Stein ZA, Susser M. Intrauterine growth retardation: epidemiological issues and public health significance. Semin Perinatol 1984;8:5-14. [Medline]
  7. Maternal anthropometry for prediction of pregnancy outcomes: memorandum from a USAID/WHO/PAHO/MotherCare meeting. Bull World Health Organ 1991;69:523-532. [Medline]
  8. Institute of Medicine. Nutrition during pregnancy and lactation: an implementation guide. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1992.
  9. Wynn AHA, Crawford MA, Doyle W, Wynn SW. Nutrition of women in anticipation of pregnancy. Nutr Health 1991;7:69-88. [Medline]
  10. Swedish version of international classification of diseases, 9th rev. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber/Allmänna Förlaget, 1986.
  11. Marsal K, Persson P-H, Larsen T, Lilja H, Selbing A, Sultan B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatr 1996;85:843-848. [Medline]
  12. Kramer MS, McLean FH, Eason EL, Usher RH. Maternal nutrition and spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:574-583. [Free Full Text]
  13. Little RE, Weinberg CR. Risk factors for antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth. Am J Epidemiol 1993;137:1177-1189. [Free Full Text]
  14. Berkowitz GS, Papiernik E. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Epidemiol Rev 1993;15:414-443. [Free Full Text]
  15. Naeye RL. Weight gain and the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:3-9. [Medline]
  16. Rydhström H, Tydén T, Herbst A, Ljungblad U, Walles B. No relation between maternal weight gain and stillbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:779-781. [Medline]
  17. Institute of Medicine. Nutrition during pregnancy. Part I. Weight gain. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1990.
  18. Eskenazi B, Fenster L, Sidney S, Elkin EP. Fetal growth retardation in infants of multiparous and nulliparous women with preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1112-1118. [Erratum, J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:950.] [Medline]
  19. Eskenazi B, Fenster L, Sidney S. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for preeclampsia. JAMA 1991;266:237-241. [Abstract]
  20. Stone JL, Lockwood CJ, Berkowitz GS, Alvarez M, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Risk factors for severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:357-361. [Free Full Text]
  21. Gleicher N, Boler LR Jr, Norusis, M, Del Granado A. Hypertensive diseases of pregnancy and parity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:1044-1049. [Medline]
  22. Rantakallio P, Läärä E, Koiranen M, Sarpola A. Maternal build and pregnancy outcome. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:199-207. [Medline]
  23. Mitchell MC, Lerner E. Weight gain and pregnancy outcome in underweight and normal weight women. J Am Diet Assoc 1989;89:634-638. [Medline]
  24. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ, et al. Maternal fatness and viability of preterm infants. BMJ 1988;296:1495-1497.
  25. Galuska DA, Serdula M, Pamuk E, Siegel PZ, Byers T. Trends in overweight among US adults from 1987 to 1993: a multistate telephone survey. Am J Public Health 1996;86:1729-1735. [Free Full Text]
  26. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. JAMA 1994;272:205-211. [Abstract]
  27. Kuskowska-Wolk A, Bergström R. Trends in body mass index and prevalence of obesity in Swedish women 1980-89. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993;47:195-199. [Abstract]
  28. Skodova Z, Pisa Z, Emrova R, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech population. Cor Vasa 1991;33:114-122. [Medline]
  29. Health implications of obesity: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:1073-1077.
  30. Manson JE, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. Body weight and mortality among women. N Engl J Med 1995;333:677-685. [Free Full Text]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Wolfe, H.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.