Conventional Compared with Individualized Chemotherapy for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
William E. Evans, Pharm.D., Mary V. Relling, Pharm.D., John H. Rodman, Pharm.D., William R. Crom, Pharm.D., James M. Boyett, Ph.D., and Ching-Hon Pui, M.D.
Background The rate of clearance of antileukemic agents differsby a factor of 3 to 10 among children with acute lymphoblasticleukemia. We hypothesized that the outcome of treatment wouldbe improved if doses were individualized to prevent low systemicexposure to the drugs in patients with fast drug clearance.
Methods We stratified and randomly assigned 182 children withnewly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia to postremissionregimens that included high-dose methotrexate and teniposideplus cytarabine. The doses of these drugs were based on body-surfacearea (in the conventional-therapy group) or the rates of clearanceof the three medications in each patient (in the individualized-treatmentgroup). In the individualized-treatment group, doses were increasedin patients with rapid clearance and decreased in patients withvery slow clearance.
Results Patients who received individualized doses had significantlyfewer courses of treatment with systemic exposures below thetarget range than did patients who received conventional doses(P<0.001 for each medication). Among the patients with B-lineageleukemia, those who received individualized therapy had a significantlybetter outcome than those given conventional therapy (P = 0.02);the mean (±SE) rates of continuous complete remissionat five years were 76±6 percent and 66±7 percent,respectively. There was no significant difference between treatmentsfor patients with T-lineage leukemia (P = 0.54). In a proportional-hazardsmodel, the time-dependent systemic exposure to methotrexate,but not to teniposide or cytarabine, was significantly relatedto the risk of early relapse in children with B-lineage leukemia.
Conclusions Adjusting the dose of methotrexate to account forthe patient's ability to clear the drug can improve the outcomein children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is curable in approximately70 percent of children.1,2 Many of the children who are notcured have presenting features that are indistinguishable fromthose in children who are cured. We reasoned that because systemicclearance of anticancer drugs differs by a factor of 3 to 10among patients,3 those with rapid drug clearance may benefitless than those with slower clearance if the dose is determinedonly according to body-surface area. This hypothesis was basedin part on our finding that the outcome was significantly worseamong children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who had lowplasma concentrations of methotrexate due to rapid clearancethan among those with slower clearance.4 On the basis of thesedata and similar pharmacodynamic data for teniposide5 and cytarabine,6we performed a prospective study in which patients with acutelymphoblastic leukemia were randomly assigned to receive dosesof these drugs that were based on body-surface area or the clearanceof the drugs in each patient.
Methods
Patients and Treatment
Between October 1988 and November 1991, we registered 188 consecutivepatients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (agerange, 4.3 months to 18.8 years) in Total Therapy Study XIIat St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.Figure 1 shows the protocol for randomization and treatment.The study was approved by the institutional review board, andinformed consent was obtained from the patients' parents orguardians. The diagnostic studies, immunophenotyping, and cytogeneticanalyses were performed as described previously.7,8
Figure 1. Study Protocol for Patients with Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Conventional or Individualized Chemotherapy.
After stratification according to leukocyte count, age, race, and DNA index, patients were randomly assigned to receive conventional or individualized treatment. Patients in the conventional-treatment group received standard doses of high-dose methotrexate (1500 mg per square meter of body-surface area), teniposide (200 mg per square meter), and cytarabine (300 mg per square meter). Patients in the individualized-treatment group received doses of these three medications that were based on their rates of drug clearance, with a target range of systemic exposure (the area under the plasma concentrationtime curve) corresponding to the 50th to 90th percentile for children receiving conventional doses of the drugs. High-dose methotrexate was given during weeks 1, 13, 25, 37, and 49; the combination of teniposide and cytarabine was given during weeks 7, 19, 31, 43, and 55. From weeks 1 through 60 of continuation therapy, oral mercaptopurine (75 mg per square meter per day) and parenteral methotrexate (40 mg per square meter per week) were given during the five weeks after each course of high-dose methotrexate or teniposide plus cytarabine. From weeks 60 through 120, only mercaptopurine and methotrexate were given.
Remission-induction therapy for all patients consisted of prednisone,vincristine, asparaginase, daunorubicin, teniposide, and cytarabine,given over a four-week period as described previously.9 Allpatients received low-dose trimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleas prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. All patientsreceived intrathecal treatment with methotrexate, hydrocortisone,and cytarabine in age-adjusted doses on days 2 and 22 of inductiontherapy and every six weeks through week 59. Only high-riskpatients and those with central nervous system leukemia at diagnosisunderwent cranial irradiation (18 and 24 Gy, respectively, duringweeks 59 to 61).
Patients with complete remissions were stratified accordingto race (nonwhite vs. white). White patients were further stratifiedaccording to the DNA index (ratio of DNA content in leukemicG0/G1 cells to that in normal G0/G1 cells, <1.16 vs. >1.16),and white patients with a DNA index of <1.16 were stratifiedaccording to age (2 to 10 years vs. other ages) and leukocytecount per cubic millimeter (<25,000 vs. >25,000). Afterstratification, the patients were randomly assigned to receiveconventional or individualized treatment.
Patients with complete remissions received continuation therapyfor 120 weeks. The regimen consisted of daily oral mercaptopurine(75 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and weekly parenteralmethotrexate (40 mg per square meter), interrupted every sixweeks during the first year for treatment with either intravenoushigh-dose methotrexate with leucovorin10 (given during weeks1, 13, 25, 37, and 49) or the combination of teniposide andcytarabine (given as simultaneous intravenous infusions duringweeks 7, 19, 31, 43, and 55). For patients randomly assignedto receive conventional therapy, fixed doses were given on thebasis of the patient's body-surface area (methotrexate, 1500mg per square meter; teniposide, 200 mg per square meter; andcytarabine, 300 mg per square meter). Plasma samples were obtainedfrom all patients for measurements of methotrexate, teniposide,and cytarabine concentrations. Methotrexate was measured bya fluorescence polarization immunoassay (TDx, Abbott Laboratories,North Chicago, Ill.) in plasma samples obtained before and 1,6, 23, and 42 hours after the start of the 24-hour intravenousinfusion.10 After the start of simultaneous, 4-hour infusionsof teniposide and cytarabine, teniposide was measured in plasmaobtained at 1.5, 3.5, 8, and 24 hours, and cytarabine in samplesobtained at 1.5 and 3.5 hours, with the use of assays previouslyreported.11,12
Dose Adjustments
In the individualized-treatment group, the doses of methotrexate,teniposide, and cytarabine were adjusted according to systemicdrug clearance in each patient.13 The target range of systemicexposure was defined a priori as the area under the plasma concentrationtimecurve corresponding to the 50th to 90th percentile for childrentreated with conventional doses of these medications. This rangewas based on prior pharmacokinetic studies in children.3 Thetarget range was 580 to 950 µM· hour for methotrexate,360 to 525 µM·hour for teniposide, and 22.5 to60 µM· hour for cytarabine. Methotrexate clearancewas estimated on the basis of the plasma concentrations at oneand six hours, with the use of a two-compartment model and aBayesian algorithm.10 If the clearance of methotrexate indicatedthat systemic exposure was outside the target range, the doserate was adjusted eight hours after the start of the infusionto achieve an exposure within the target range (i.e., 800 µM·hour),but the dose was not decreased to an infusion rate that wouldproduce a steady-state plasma concentration of <20 µMduring the infusion. The minimum of 20 µM was selectedbecause it is 25 percent above the value (16 µM) thatwas associated with an increased risk of relapse in our previousstudy,4 providing a margin of error for dose adjustments. Cytarabineand teniposide clearances were estimated with the use of a one-compartmentpharmacokinetic model (for cytarabine) or a two-compartmentmodel (for teniposide) and a Bayesian algorithm.13,14 If theclearance of either medication indicated that systemic exposurewas outside the target range, the next dose given was calculatedto achieve an exposure within the target range (i.e., 450 µM·hour for teniposide and 42 µM · hour for cytarabine).
The process described above was repeated for each course withall three medications. As a precaution, the maximal increasein the dose of teniposide or cytarabine was limited to 50 percentof the previous dose, with the escalation in doses continuingfrom one course to the next, as necessary, until systemic exposurewas within the target range. For both treatment groups, if twosuccessive courses of either teniposide plus cytarabine or high-dosemethotrexate resulted in a delay of seven or more days beforethe resumption of treatment (because of an absolute neutrophilcount of less than 300 per cubic millimeter, a platelet countof less than 50,000 per cubic millimeter, mucositis of grade4 according to the National Cancer Institute's classification,grade 4 hepatotoxicity, or grade 3 or 4 infection), subsequentdoses were decreased by 25 percent.
Assessment of Outcome and Statistical Analysis
Continuous complete remission was defined as spanning the intervalfrom the date of complete remission to the date of the firsttreatment failure or the last contact with the patient. Fisher'sexact test was used to evaluate correlations between subgroupsof patients and base-line clinical characteristics. Distributionsof event-free survival and continuous complete remission wereestimated according to the method of Kaplan and Meier and comparedwith the stratified MantelHaenszel test. Correlationsbetween continuous complete remission and time-dependent covariateswere evaluated with the Cox proportional-hazards model and theWald test. Longitudinal binary measures, such as the percentageof courses with toxic effects, were analyzed with the SAS version6.12 macro Glimmix, which uses the Proc Mixed program in theSAS/STAT software. All reported P values are for two-sided tests.
Results
Of the 188 patients enrolled in the study, 182 (97 percent)had complete remissions. Half these patients (91) were randomlyassigned to conventional treatment, and the other half to individualizedtreatment. There were no significant differences in base-linedemographic or clinical characteristics between the two groups(Table 1). Likewise, there were no significant differences inthe frequency of central nervous system involvement at diagnosis(P = 0.48) or in the prevalence of lymphoblasts with rearrangedTEL or MLL genes (P = 0.34 and P = 1.0, respectively) or t(1;19)or t(9;22) chromosomal translocations (P = 0.39 and P = 0.68,respectively).
Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients.
For all patients, the mean rate of clearance was 103 ml perminute per square meter (coefficient of variation, 26.0 percent)for methotrexate, 14.6 ml per minute per square meter (coefficientof variation, 39.6 percent) for teniposide, and 969 ml per minuteper square meter (coefficient of variation, 62.3 percent) forcytarabine. The mean rate of clearance did not differ significantlybetween the group assigned to conventional treatment and thegroup assigned to individualized treatment: methotrexate, 102ml per minute per square meter (coefficient of variation, 27percent) and 104 ml per minute per square meter (coefficientof variation, 26 percent); teniposide, 14.2 ml per minute persquare meter (coefficient of variation, 33 percent) and 15.0ml per minute per square meter (coefficient of variation, 44percent); and cytarabine, 1010 ml per minute per square meter(coefficient of variation, 68 percent) and 931 ml per minuteper square meter (coefficient of variation, 55 percent), respectively.For all the drugs, the median coefficient of variation in clearancewas lower in individual patients than between patients: 17 percentversus 26 percent for methotrexate, 17 percent versus 40 percentfor teniposide, and 43 percent versus 62 percent for cytarabine.
Systemic Exposure
The proportion of courses of treatment in which systemic exposureswere below the target range was significantly lower in the individualized-treatmentgroup than in the conventional-treatment group (P<0.001 foreach medication) (Figure 2). In the individualized-treatmentgroup, systemic exposure was below the target range in 7.7 percentof courses of methotrexate, 14.6 percent of courses of teniposide,and 20.7 percent of courses of cytarabine, in part because thefirst course of teniposide and cytarabine was not adjusted,and because the maximal increase in the dose of each drug waslimited to 50 percent of the previous dose. The respective mediandoses in the conventional-treatment group and the individualized-treatmentgroup were 1502 mg per square meter (5th to 95th percentile,1418 to 1580) and 1992 mg per square meter (5th to 95th percentile,1301 to 3088) for methotrexate, 200 mg per square meter (5thto 95th percentile, 194 to 207) and 245 mg per square meter(5th to 95th percentile, 158 to 424) for teniposide, and 300mg per square meter (5th to 95th percentile, 290 to 306) and375 mg per square meter (5th to 95th percentile, 221 to 752)for cytarabine. The five courses of each medication were givenover a median period of 55 weeks in both treatment groups.
Figure 2. Percentage of Treatment Courses during Which Systemic Exposures Were below, within, or above the Target Range in the 91 Patients Receiving Individualized Doses of Methotrexate, Teniposide, and Cytarabine and the 91 Receiving Conventional Doses.
The percentage of courses during which systemic exposures were below the target range was significantly lower in patients receiving individualized therapy (P<0.001 for all three medications).
Toxicity
There were no differences in the number of severe toxic effectsafter courses of either high-dose methotrexate or teniposideplus cytarabine in the two treatment groups, with the exceptionthat there were more grade 3 or 4 infections after courses ofteniposide plus cytarabine in the individualized-treatment group(7.3 percent, vs. 3.4 percent; P = 0.02) (Table 2). There wereno deaths from infections related to therapy in either group.The proportions of patients in whom the dose of teniposide pluscytarabine was reduced by 25 percent because of excessive toxicitywere identical in the two treatment groups (7.7 percent).
Table 2. Toxic Effects of Chemotherapy in the Two Treatment Groups.
Outcome
KaplanMeier estimates of overall and event-free survivalat five years for all 188 patients, regardless of randomization,were 83±3 percent and 67±4 percent, respectively(Figure 3A). The KaplanMeier estimate of continuous completeremission at five years was 72±6 percent in the individualized-treatmentgroup and 66±6 percent in the conventional-treatmentgroup (Figure 3B). Because there was a significant statisticalinteraction between treatment and leukemia-cell lineage (P =0.05), the comparison of outcomes in the two groups was performedseparately for patients with B-lineage leukemia (84 percentof the patients) and those with T-lineage leukemia (16 percentof the patients). In the group with B-lineage leukemia, therewere 8 hematologic and 2 central nervous system relapses amongthe 69 patients assigned to individualized treatment, and therewere 15 hematologic, 9 central nervous system, and 2 testicularrelapses among the 74 patients assigned to conventional treatment.In the group with T-lineage leukemia, three hematologic andthree central nervous system relapses occurred among the 13patients who received individualized treatment, and one hematologicand four central nervous system relapses occurred among the14 patients who received conventional treatment.
Figure 3. KaplanMeier Estimates of Overall and Event-free Survival among All 188 Patients Enrolled in the Study (Panel A), and KaplanMeier Estimates of Continuous Complete Remission among the 182 Patients Randomly Assigned to Individualized or Conventional Treatment (Panel B).
Among the patients with B-lineage leukemia, the individualized-treatmentgroup had a significantly better outcome than the conventional-treatmentgroup (P = 0.02); the rates of continuous complete remissionat five years were 76±6 percent and 66±7 percent,respectively (Figure 4). The relative risk of a relapse in theconventional-treatment group, as compared with the individualized-treatmentgroup, was 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 3.72).In contrast, among the patients with T-lineage leukemia, therewas no significant difference in outcome between the patientsreceiving individualized treatment and those receiving conventionaltreatment (rates of continuous complete remission at five years,64±14 percent and 46±14 percent, respectively;P = 0.54), although because of the relatively small number ofpatients with T-lineage leukemia, the study had limited powerto detect differences.
Figure 4. KaplanMeier Estimates of Continuous Complete Remission in Patients with B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
The estimated rate of continuous complete remission was significantly higher in the 69 patients receiving individualized treatment than in the 74 receiving conventional treatment. The estimated (±SE) rate of continuous complete remission at five years is shown for both groups (P = 0.02).
Relation of Systemic Exposure to Clinical Outcome
Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to assess the relationbetween systemic exposure (i.e., the time-dependent averagesystemic exposure for all courses and the proportion of courseswith systemic exposures above the lower limit of the targetrange) and the duration of continuous complete remission. Theprobability of failure was assessed for the period during whichindividualized or conventional therapy was given (i.e., thefirst 462 days). In patients with B-lineage leukemia, the riskof a relapse during this period was significantly related toboth the average systemic exposure to methotrexate (P = 0.02)and the proportion of courses with systemic exposures abovethe target threshold (580 µM·hour, P = 0.02). Witheach decrease of 100 µM· hour in the average systemicexposure to methotrexate, the relative risk increased by a factorof 1.79. In the group of patients with B-lineage leukemia, therisk of an early relapse among patients with no courses involvingsystemic exposures above the target threshold was 6.5 timesthe risk among patients with all courses involving exposuresabove the target threshold. The risk of an early relapse wasnot related to the average systemic exposure to teniposide orcytarabine (P = 0.26 and P = 0.27, respectively) or the proportionof courses with systemic exposures above the target threshold(P = 0.08 and P = 0.40, respectively). In the group with T-lineageleukemia, the risk of an early relapse tended to be associatedwith the average systemic exposure to cytarabine (P = 0.07)but not with systemic exposure to methotrexate (P = 0.92) orteniposide (P = 0.26).
Discussion
This study demonstrates that in the treatment of childhood B-lineageacute lymphoblastic leukemia, increasing the dose of methotrexatein patients with rapid clearance of the drug significantly improvesthe outcome without increasing the toxicity. Several previousstudies also found a relation between systemic exposure to chemotherapyand anticancer effects,15 but none of them were prospective,randomized trials designed to determine whether therapeuticinterventions based on these relations could result in a betterclinical outcome.
Our study indicates that conventional chemotherapy sometimesfails because patients receive inadequate doses of drugs, notbecause their leukemia is drug-resistant. This finding extendsthe results of earlier studies documenting inferior resultswhen the intensity of chemotherapy was reduced by giving lowerdoses of medication.16,17 Our results show that lower systemicexposure due to rapid drug clearance can adversely affect theoutcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The recommended(i.e., conventional) doses of chemotherapeutic drugs are typicallywithin the limits that essentially all patients can tolerate,regardless of the rate at which the medication is metabolizedor eliminated in individual patients. For this reason, it isnot surprising that such doses may be suboptimal in some patients.That the intensity of early treatment with methotrexate cansignificantly influence the risk of a relapse in acute lymphoblasticleukemia is consistent with a previous demonstration of a superioroutcome in children treated with a single high dose of methotrexateat the time of diagnosis.18
Why did individualized therapy benefit only the children withB-lineage leukemia? It is possible that the target range ofsystemic exposure to methotrexate was inadequate in the patientswith T-lineage leukemia. Recent studies of methotrexate accumulationin leukemic lymphoblasts have shown that T-lineage blasts accumulateactive metabolites (methotrexate polyglutamates) less avidlythan do B-lineage blasts but that higher doses can result ingreater accumulations.19,20,21,22 Improvements in treating T-lineageleukemia have been attributed in part to the use of higher dosesof methotrexate (5 g per square meter),23 which produced concentrationsabove the target range in our study.
Our findings that individual differences in drug clearance canresult in differences in efficacy and that these differencescan be overcome in part by individualized therapy are not unprecedented.Other drugs with relatively narrow therapeutic indexes, suchas aminoglycoside antibiotics, cyclosporine, and anticonvulsantagents, are commonly administered in individualized doses.
Our findings raise the question whether it is necessary to individualizethe doses of antileukemic agents in all children with B-lineageacute lymphoblastic leukemia. We found that individualizingthe dose of methotrexate was beneficial, but this approach maynot apply to all antileukemic agents; there was no evidenceof a benefit in individualizing the doses of teniposide andcytarabine. These results suggest that methotrexate may be thecritical drug for dose adjustments in treatment regimens similarto ours. An alternative to individualizing the dose of methotrexateis to select a dose that produces adequate concentrations evenin patients with rapid drug clearance (e.g., 2.5 g per squaremeter in patients with B-lineage leukemia), although the potentialfor greater neurotoxicity may limit this strategy. In view ofthe low variation in drug clearance in individual patients,as compared with the variation between patients, it might bepossible to use a single clearance estimate (after the firstdose) to adjust the doses for all subsequent treatment courses.
It is possible that with more aggressive treatment of leukemia,optimizing the dose will be less important. However, less intensiveprotocols are now being evaluated for the treatment of patientswho have leukemia with favorable genetic and clinical features,to prevent serious toxic effects.24,25 Unfortunately, even withthe most sophisticated methods of risk assignment, some of thesepresumably lower-risk patients have relapses when treated withless intensive regimens.
It remains to be determined whether easily monitored biologicend points (e.g., the leukocyte count) can be used to identifypatients who are receiving inadequate doses of antileukemicagents. Nevertheless, in patients receiving combination chemotherapywith agents that have overlapping toxic effects, measurementof drug concentrations in plasma may be the best method fordetermining whether appropriate doses are being used in individualpatients.
Supported in part by grants from the National Institutes ofHealth (CA20180, R37 CA36401, CA51001, and CA21765), the Stateof Tennessee, and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities.
We are indebted to all the persons involved in the treatmentof the patients and the individualization of doses, includingDrs. D.K. Baker, F. Behm, M. Christensen, W.M. Crist, E. Gregory,D.A. Kalwinsky, H.H. Mahmoud, J. Mirro, S. Raimondi, W.M. Roberts,R. Riberio, G.K. Rivera, M.H. Sanders, J.T. Sandlund, V. Santana,J.V. Simone, C.F. Stewart, and L. Stricklin; to N. Kornegayfor her expertise in data-base management and quality control;to our dedicated postdoctoral fellows, Drs. W.P. Petros, T.S.Madden, M. Sunderland, H.L. McLeod, D.J. Murry, R. Evans, T.W.Synold, D.S. Sonnichsen, S. Baker, M. Tonda, C. Kearns, andA. Galpin; to medical technologists C.R. Stewart, E.T. Melton,M. Needham, B. Alexander, M. Chung, and L. McNinch and researchnurses S. Ring, L. Walters, T. Kuehner, and M. Edwards; to Y.Yanshevski for his biomedical-modeling expertise; to P.L. Harrisonfor her contributions to the statistical analyses; and mostimportant, to the patients and parents who volunteered to participatein the study.
Source Information
From the Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences (W.E.E., M.V.R., J.H.R., W.R.C.), Biostatistics and Epidemiology (J.M.B.), and HematologyOncology (C.-H.P.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; and the Colleges of Pharmacy (W.E.E., M.V.R., J.H.R., W.R.C.) and Medicine (W.E.E., C.-H.P.), University of Tennessee both in Memphis.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Evans at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 N. Lauderdale St., Memphis, TN 38105.
References
Pui C-H. Childhood leukemias. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1618-1630. [Free Full Text]
Simone JV. Childhood leukemia as a model for cancer research. Cancer Res 1979;39:4301-4307. [Free Full Text]
Rodman JH, Relling MV, Stewart CF, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs in children. Semin Oncol 1993;20:18-29. [Medline]
Evans WE, Crom WR, Abromowitch M, et al. Clinical pharmacodynamics of high-dose methotrexate in acute lymphocytic leukemia: identification of a relation between concentration and effect. N Engl J Med 1986;314:471-477. [Abstract]
Rodman JH, Abromowitch M, Sinkule JA, Hayes FA, Rivera GK, Evans WE. Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide: systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:1007-1014. [Free Full Text]
Plunkett W, Liliemark JO, Adams TM, et al. Saturation of 1--D-arabinofuranosylcytosine 5'-triphosphate accumulation in leukemia cells during high-dose 1--D-arabinofuranosylcytosine therapy. Cancer Res 1987;47:3005-3011. [Free Full Text]
Behm FG, Raimondi SC, Schell MJ, Look AT, Rivera GK, Pui C-H. Lack of CD45 antigen on blast cells in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with chromosomal hyperdiploidy and other favorable prognostic features. Blood 1992;79:1011-1016. [Free Full Text]
Williams DL, Harris A, Williams KJ, Brosius MJ, Lemonds W. A direct bone marrow chromosome technique for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1984;13:239-257. [CrossRef][Medline]
Rivera GK, Raimondi SC, Hancock ML, et al. Improved outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with reinforced early treatment and rotational combination chemotherapy. Lancet 1991;337:61-66. [CrossRef][Medline]
Relling MV, Fairclough D, Ayers D, et al. Patient characteristics associated with high-risk methotrexate concentrations and toxicity. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:1667-1672. [Free Full Text]
Evans WE, Rodman JH, Relling MV, et al. Differences in teniposide disposition and pharmacodynamics in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992;260:71-77. [Free Full Text]
Sinkule JA, Evans WE. High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for cytosine arabinoside, uracil arabinoside and some related nucleosides. J Chromatogr 1983;274:87-93. [Medline]
Evans WE, Rodman JH, Relling MV, et al. Individualized dosages of chemotherapy as a strategy to improve response for acute lymphocytic leukemia. Semin Hematol 1991;28:Suppl 4:15-21. [Medline]
Rodman JH, Furman WL, Sunderland M, Rivera G, Evans WE. Escalating teniposide systemic exposure to increase dose intensity for pediatric cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:287-293. [Free Full Text]
Pinkel D, Hernandez K, Borella L, et al. Drug dosage and remission duration in childhood lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 1971;27:247-256. [CrossRef][Medline]
Devita VT. Dose-response is alive and well. J Clin Oncol 1986;4:1157-1159. [Free Full Text]
Niemeyer CM, Gelbar RD, Tarbell NJ, et al. Low-dose versus high-dose methotrexate during remission induction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Protocol 81-01 update). Blood 1991;78:2514-2519. [Free Full Text]
Synold TW, Relling MV, Boyett JM, et al. Blast cell methotrexate-polyglutamate accumulation in vivo differs by lineage, ploidy, and methotrexate dose in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Invest 1994;94:1996-2001.
Masson E, Relling MV, Synold TW, et al. Accumulation of methotrexate polyglutamates in lymphoblasts is a determinant of antileukemic effects in vivo: a rationale for high-dose methotrexate. J Clin Invest 1996;97:73-80. [Medline]
Galpin AJ, Schuetz JD, Masson E, et al. Differences in folylpolyglutamate synthetase and dihydrofolate reductase expression in human B-lineage versus T-lineage leukemic lymphoblasts: mechanisms for lineage differences in methotrexate polyglutamylation and cytotoxicity. Mol Pharmacol 1997;52:155-163. [Free Full Text]
Barredo JC, Synold TW, Laver J, et al. Differences in constitutive and post-methotrexate folylpolyglutamate synthetase activity in B-lineage and T-lineage leukemia. Blood 1994;84:564-569. [Free Full Text]
Reiter A, Schrappe M, Ludwig W-D, et al. Chemotherapy in 998 unselected childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: results and conclusions of the multicenter trial ALL-BFM 86. Blood 1994;84:3122-3133. [Free Full Text]
Mahoney DH Jr, Camitta BM, Leventhal BG, et al. Repetitive low dose oral methotrexate and intravenous mercaptopurine treatment for patients with lower risk B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group pilot study. Cancer 1995;75:2623-2631. [CrossRef][Medline]
Veerman AJP, Hahlen K, Kamps WA, et al. High cure rate with a moderately intensive treatment regimen in non-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of protocol ALL VI from the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:911-918. [Free Full Text]
Pui, C.-H., Campana, D., Pei, D., Bowman, W. P., Sandlund, J. T., Kaste, S. C., Ribeiro, R. C., Rubnitz, J. E., Raimondi, S. C., Onciu, M., Coustan-Smith, E., Kun, L. E., Jeha, S., Cheng, C., Howard, S. C., Simmons, V., Bayles, A., Metzger, M. L., Boyett, J. M., Leung, W., Handgretinger, R., Downing, J. R., Evans, W. E., Relling, M. V.
(2009). Treating Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia without Cranial Irradiation. NEJM
360: 2730-2741
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tucci, F., Arico, M.
(2008). Treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. haematol
93: 1124-1128
[Full Text]
McDonald, G B, Frieze, D
(2008). A problem-oriented approach to liver disease in oncology patients. Gut
57: 987-1003
[Full Text]
Jones, T. S., Kaste, S. C., Liu, W., Cheng, C., Yang, W., Tantisira, K. G., Pui, C.-H., Relling, M. V.
(2008). CRHR1 Polymorphisms Predict Bone Density in Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. JCO
26: 3031-3037
[Abstract][Full Text]
Walko, C. M., McLeod, H. L.
(2008). Will We Ever Be Ready for Blood Level-Guided Therapy?. JCO
26: 2078-2079
[Full Text]
Oudot, C., Auclerc, M.-F., Levy, V., Porcher, R., Piguet, C., Perel, Y., Gandemer, V., Debre, M., Vermylen, C., Pautard, B., Berger, C., Schmitt, C., Leblanc, T., Cayuela, J.-M., Socie, G., Michel, G., Leverger, G., Baruchel, A.
(2008). Prognostic Factors for Leukemic Induction Failure in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Outcome After Salvage Therapy: The FRALLE 93 Study. JCO
26: 1496-1503
[Abstract][Full Text]
Alnaim, L.
(2007). Therapeutic drug monitoring of cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract
13: 207-221
[Abstract]
Mathijssen, R. H.J., de Jong, F. A., Loos, W. J., van der Bol, J. M., Verweij, J., Sparreboom, A.
(2007). Flat-Fixed Dosing Versus Body Surface Area Based Dosing of Anticancer Drugs in Adults: Does It Make a Difference?. The Oncologist
12: 913-923
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hijiya, N., Hudson, M. M., Lensing, S., Zacher, M., Onciu, M., Behm, F. G., Razzouk, B. I., Ribeiro, R. C., Rubnitz, J. E., Sandlund, J. T., Rivera, G. K., Evans, W. E., Relling, M. V., Pui, C.-H.
(2007). Cumulative Incidence of Secondary Neoplasms as a First Event After Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. JAMA
297: 1207-1215
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hijiya, N., Panetta, J. C., Zhou, Y., Kyzer, E. P., Howard, S. C., Jeha, S., Razzouk, B. I., Ribeiro, R. C., Rubnitz, J. E., Hudson, M. M., Sandlund, J. T., Pui, C.-H., Relling, M. V.
(2006). Body mass index does not influence pharmacokinetics or outcome of treatment in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood
108: 3997-4002
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kloft, C., Wallin, J., Henningsson, A., Chatelut, E., Karlsson, M. O.
(2006). Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model for Neutropenia with Patient Subgroup Identification: Comparison across Anticancer Drugs.. Clin. Cancer Res.
12: 5481-5490
[Abstract][Full Text]
Salinger, D. H., McCune, J. S., Ren, A. G., Shen, D. D., Slattery, J. T., Phillips, B., McDonald, G. B., Vicini, P.
(2006). Real-time Dose Adjustment of Cyclophosphamide in a Preparative Regimen for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: A Bayesian Pharmacokinetic Approach.. Clin. Cancer Res.
12: 4888-4898
[Abstract][Full Text]
Parshuram, C. S, Dupuis, L L., To, T., Weitzman, S. S, Koren, G., Laupacis, A.
(2006). Occurrence and Impact of Unanticipated Variation in Intravenous Methotrexate Dosing. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
40: 805-811
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sterba, J., Dusek, L., Demlova, R., Valik, D.
(2006). Pretreatment Plasma Folate Modulates the Pharmacodynamic Effect of High-Dose Methotrexate in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: "Folate Overrescue" Concept Revisited. Clin. Chem.
52: 692-700
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pui, C.-H., Evans, W. E.
(2006). Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. NEJM
354: 166-178
[Full Text]
Pui, C.-H., Pei, D., Sandlund, J. T., Campana, D., Ribeiro, R. C., Razzouk, B. I., Rubnitz, J. E., Howard, S. C., Hijiya, N., Jeha, S., Cheng, C., Downing, J. R., Evans, W. E., Relling, M. V., Hudson, M.
(2005). Risk of Adverse Events After Completion of Therapy for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. JCO
23: 7936-7941
[Abstract][Full Text]
Reddick, W. E., Glass, J. O., Helton, K. J., Langston, J. W., Li, C.-S., Pui, C.-H.
(2005). A Quantitative MR Imaging Assessment of Leukoencephalopathy in Children Treated for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia without Irradiation. Am. J. Neuroradiol.
26: 2371-2377
[Abstract][Full Text]
Petros, W. P., Hopkins, P. J., Spruill, S., Broadwater, G., Vredenburgh, J. J., Colvin, O. M., Peters, W. P., Jones, R. B., Hall, J., Marks, J. R.
(2005). Associations Between Drug Metabolism Genotype, Chemotherapy Pharmacokinetics, and Overall Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer. JCO
23: 6117-6125
[Abstract][Full Text]
Zwaan, M.
(2005). Toward individualized dosing in pediatric ALL. Blood
105: 4544-4545
[Full Text]
Rocha, J. C. C., Cheng, C., Liu, W., Kishi, S., Das, S., Cook, E. H., Sandlund, J. T., Rubnitz, J., Ribeiro, R., Campana, D., Pui, C.-H., Evans, W. E., Relling, M. V.
(2005). Pharmacogenetics of outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood
105: 4752-4758
[Abstract][Full Text]
Boesler, B., Czock, D., Keller, F., Griesshammer, M., Seufferlein, T., Karges, W., Rasche, F. M.
(2005). Clinical course of haemodialysis patients with malignancies and dose-adjusted chemotherapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant
20: 1187-1191
[Abstract][Full Text]
Reddick, W. E., Glass, J. O., Helton, K. J., Langston, J. W., Xiong, X., Wu, S., Pui, C.-H.
(2005). Prevalence of Leukoencephalopathy in Children Treated for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with High-Dose Methotrexate. Am. J. Neuroradiol.
26: 1263-1269
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sandstrom, M., Lindman, H., Nygren, P., Lidbrink, E., Bergh, J., Karlsson, M.O.
(2005). Model Describing the Relationship Between Pharmacokinetics and Hematologic Toxicity of the Epirubicin-Docetaxel Regimen in Breast Cancer Patients. JCO
23: 413-421
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yule, S. M., Price, L., McMahon, A. D., Pearson, A. D. J., Boddy, A. V.
(2004). Cyclophosphamide Metabolism in Children with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res.
10: 455-460
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pui, C.-H., Cheng, C., Leung, W., Rai, S. N., Rivera, G. K., Sandlund, J. T., Ribeiro, R. C., Relling, M. V., Kun, L. E., Evans, W. E., Hudson, M. M.
(2003). Extended Follow-up of Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. NEJM
349: 640-649
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schmiegelow, K., Bjork, O., Glomstein, A., Gustafsson, G., Keiding, N., Kristinsson, J., Makipernaa, A., Rosthoj, S., Szumlanski, C., Sorensen, T. M, Weinshilboum, R.
(2003). Intensification of Mercaptopurine/Methotrexate Maintenance Chemotherapy May Increase the Risk of Relapse for Some Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. JCO
21: 1332-1339
[Abstract][Full Text]
Burger, B., Zimmermann, M., Mann, G., Kuhl, J., Loning, L., Riehm, H., Reiter, A., Schrappe, M.
(2003). Diagnostic Cerebrospinal Fluid Examination in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Significance of Low Leukocyte Counts With Blasts or Traumatic Lumbar Puncture. JCO
21: 184-188
[Abstract][Full Text]
Leung, W., Rose, S. R., Zhou, Y., Hancock, M. L., Burstein, S., Schriock, E. A., Lustig, R., Danish, R. K., Evans, W. E., Hudson, M. M., Pui, C.-H.
(2002). Outcomes of Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy in Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. JCO
20: 2959-2964
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sandlund, J. T., Harrison, P. L., Rivera, G., Behm, F. G., Head, D., Boyett, J., Rubnitz, J. E., Gajjar, A., Raimondi, S., Ribeiro, R., Hudson, M., Relling, M., Evans, W., Pui, C.-H.
(2002). Persistence of lymphoblasts in bone marrow on day 15 and days 22 to 25 of remission induction predicts a dismal treatment outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood
100: 43-47
[Abstract][Full Text]
Coustan-Smith, E., Sancho, J., Behm, F. G., Hancock, M. L., Razzouk, B. I., Ribeiro, R. C., Rivera, G. K., Rubnitz, J. E., Sandlund, J. T., Pui, C.-H., Campana, D.
(2002). Prognostic importance of measuring early clearance of leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood
100: 52-58
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bergh, J.
(2002). Is pharmacokinetically guided chemotherapy dosage a better way forward?. Ann Oncol
13: 343-344
[Full Text]
Petros, W. P., Broadwater, G., Berry, D., Jones, R. B., Vredenburgh, J. J., Gilbert, C. J., Gibbs, J. P., Colvin, O. M., Peters, W. P.
(2002). Association of High-dose Cyclophosphamide, Cisplatin, and Carmustine Pharmacokinetics with Survival, Toxicity, and Dosing Weight in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res.
8: 698-705
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kebelmann-Betzing, C., Seeger, K., Wolf, R., Henze, G., Gajjar, A., Pui, C.-H.
(2001). Traumatic lumbar puncture at diagnosis and outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood
98: 3496-3497
[Full Text]
Evans, W. E., Hon, Y. Y., Bomgaars, L., Coutre, S., Holdsworth, M., Janco, R., Kalwinsky, D., Keller, F., Khatib, Z., Margolin, J., Murray, J., Quinn, J., Ravindranath, Y., Ritchey, K., Roberts, W., Rogers, Z. R., Schiff, D., Steuber, C., Tucci, F., Kornegay, N., Krynetski, E. Y., Relling, M. V.
(2001). Preponderance of Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Deficiency and Heterozygosity Among Patients Intolerant to Mercaptopurine or Azathioprine. JCO
19: 2293-2301
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gajjar, A., Harrison, P. L., Sandlund, J. T., Rivera, G. K., Ribeiro, R. C., Rubnitz, J. E., Razzouk, B., Relling, M. V., Evans, W. E., Boyett, J. M., Pui, C.-H.
(2000). Traumatic lumbar puncture at diagnosis adversely affects outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood
96: 3381-3384
[Abstract][Full Text]
Coustan-Smith, E., Sancho, J., Hancock, M. L., Boyett, J. M., Behm, F. G., Raimondi, S. C., Sandlund, J. T., Rivera, G. K., Rubnitz, J. E., Ribeiro, R. C., Pui, C.-H., Campana, D.
(2000). Clinical importance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood
96: 2691-2696
[Abstract][Full Text]
Friedmann, A. M., Weinstein, H. J.
(2000). The Role of Prognostic Features in the Treatment of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. The Oncologist
5: 321-328
[Abstract][Full Text]
McLeod, H. L., Cassidy, J., Powrie, R. H., Priest, D. G., Zorbas, M. A., Synold, T. W., Shibata, S., Spicer, D., Bissett, D., Pithavala, Y. K., Collier, M. A., Paradiso, L. J., Roberts, J. D.
(2000). Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of the Glycinamide Ribonucleotide Formyltransferase Inhibitor AG2034. Clin. Cancer Res.
6: 2677-2684
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schrappe, M., Reiter, A., Ludwig, W.-D., Harbott, J., Zimmermann, M., Hiddemann, W., Niemeyer, C., Henze, G., Feldges, A., Zintl, F., Kornhuber, B., Ritter, J., Welte, K., Gadner, H., Riehm, H.
(2000). Improved outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia despite reduced use of anthracyclines and cranial radiotherapy: results of trial ALL-BFM 90. Blood
95: 3310-3322
[Abstract][Full Text]
Collins, J. M.
(2000). Cytochrome P-450 and Other Determinants of Pharmacokinetics, Toxicity, and Efficacy in Humans. Clin. Cancer Res.
6: 1203-1204
[Full Text]
Mahoney, D. H. Jr, Shuster, J. J., Nitschke, R., Lauer, S., Steuber, C. P., Camitta, B.
(2000). Intensification With Intermediate-Dose Intravenous Methotrexate Is Effective Therapy for Children With Lower-Risk B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study. JCO
18: 1285-1294
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kantarjian, H. M., O’Brien, S., Smith, T. L., Cortes, J., Giles, F. J., Beran, M., Pierce, S., Huh, Y., Andreeff, M., Koller, C., Ha, C. S., Keating, M. J., Murphy, S., Freireich, E. J.
(2000). Results of Treatment With Hyper-CVAD, a Dose-Intensive Regimen, in Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia. JCO
18: 547-547
[Abstract][Full Text]
Eden, O B
(2000). Therapeutic trials in childhood ALL: what's their future?. J. Clin. Pathol.
53: 55-59
[Full Text]
Felix, C. A., Lange, B. J., Chessells, J. M.
(2000). Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Challenges and Controversies in 2000. ASH Education Book
2000: 285-302
[Abstract][Full Text]
Relling, M. V., Hancock, M. L., Rivera, G. K., Sandlund, J. T., Ribeiro, R. C., Krynetski, E. Y., Pui, C.-H., Evans, W. E.
(1999). Mercaptopurine Therapy Intolerance and Heterozygosity at the Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Gene Locus. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
91: 2001-2008
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rots, M. G., Pieters, R., Peters, G. J., van Zantwijk, C. H., Mauritz, R., Noordhuis, P., Willey, J. C., Hahlen, K., Creutzig, U., Janka-Schaub, G., Kaspers, G. J.L., Veerman, A. J.P., Jansen, G.
(1999). Circumvention of Methotrexate Resistance in Childhood Leukemia Subtypes by Rationally Designed Antifolates. Blood
94: 3121-3128
[Abstract][Full Text]
Evans, W. E., Relling, M. V.
(1999). Pharmacogenomics: Translating Functional Genomics into Rational Therapeutics. Science
286: 487-491
[Abstract][Full Text]
McLeod, H. L., Evans, W. E.
(1999). Oral Cancer Chemotherapy: The Promise and the Pitfalls. Clin. Cancer Res.
5: 2669-2671
[Full Text]
Zecca, M., Pession, A., Messina, C., Bonetti, F., Favre, C., Prete, A., Cesaro, S., Porta, F., Mazzarino, I., Giorgiani, G., Rondelli, R., Locatelli, F.
(1999). Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa, and Cyclophosphamide as a Conditioning Regimen for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First or Second Remission Undergoing Bone Marrow Transplantation With HLA-Identical Siblings. JCO
17: 1838-1838
[Abstract][Full Text]
Relling, M. V., Hancock, M. L., Boyett, J. M., Pui, C.-H., Evans, W. E.
(1999). Prognostic Importance of 6-Mercaptopurine Dose Intensity in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Blood
93: 2817-2823
[Abstract][Full Text]
Nieto, Y., Xu, X., Cagnoni, P. J., Matthes, S., Shpall, E. J., Bearman, S. I., Murphy, J., Jones, R. B.
(1999). Nonpredictable Pharmacokinetic Behavior of High-Dose Cyclophosphamide in Combination with Cisplatin and 1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Clin. Cancer Res.
5: 747-751
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rowinsky, E. K., Jiroutek, M., Bonomi, P., Johnson, D., Baker, S. D.
(1999). Paclitaxel Steady-State Plasma Concentration as a Determinant of Disease Outcome and Toxicity in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin. Clin. Cancer Res.
5: 767-774
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pui, C.-H., Boyett, J. M., Relling, M. V., Harrison, P. L., Rivera, G. K., Behm, F. G., Sandlund, J. T., Ribeiro, R. C., Rubnitz, J. E., Gajjar, A., Evans, W. E.
(1999). Sex Differences in Prognosis for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. JCO
17: 818-818
[Abstract][Full Text]
Belkov, V. M., Krynetski, E. Y., Schuetz, J. D., Yanishevski, Y., Masson, E., Mathew, S., Raimondi, S., Pui, C.-H., Relling, M. V., Evans, W. E.
(1999). Reduced Folate Carrier Expression in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Mechanism for Ploidy but not Lineage Differences in Methotrexate Accumulation. Blood
93: 1643-1650
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rots, M. G., Pieters, R., Kaspers, G.-J. L., van Zantwijk, C. H., Noordhuis, P., Mauritz, R., Veerman, A. J.P., Jansen, G., Peters, G. J.
(1999). Differential Methotrexate Resistance in Childhood T- Versus Common/PreB-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Can Be Measured by an In Situ Thymidylate Synthase Inhibition Assay, But Not by the MTT Assay. Blood
93: 1067-1074
[Abstract][Full Text]
Coulthard, S. A., Howell, C., Robson, J., Hall, A. G.
(1998). The Relationship Between Thiopurine Methyltransferase Activity and Genotype in Blasts From Patients With Acute Leukemia. Blood
92: 2856-2862
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pui, C.-H., Evans, W. E.
(1998). Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. NEJM
339: 605-615
[Full Text]