FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 338:506-511 February 19, 1998 Number 8 Next

Abstract PDF Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background The 4 allele of the gene encoding apolipoprotein E (APOE) is strongly associated with Alzheimer's disease, but its value in the diagnosis remains uncertain.

Methods We reviewed clinical diagnoses and diagnoses obtained at autopsy in 2188 patients referred to 1 of 26 Alzheimer's disease centers for evaluation of dementia. The sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnosis or the presence of an APOE 4 allele were calculated, with pathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease used as the standard. The added value of the APOE genotype was estimated with pretest and post-test probabilities from multivariate analyses to generate receiver-operating-characteristic curves plotting sensitivity against the false positive rate.

Results Of the 2188 patients, 1833 were given a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and the diagnosis was confirmed pathologically in 1770 patients at autopsy. Sixty-two percent of patients with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease, as compared with 65 percent of those with pathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease, had at least one APOE 4 allele. The sensitivity of the clinical diagnosis was 93 percent, and the specificity was 55 percent, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of the APOE 4 allele were 65 and 68 percent, respectively. The addition of information about the APOE genotype increased the overall specificity to 84 percent in patients who met the clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease, although the sensitivity decreased. The improvement in specificity remained statistically significant in the multivariate analysis after adjustment for differences in age, clinical diagnosis, sex, and center.

Conclusions APOE genotyping does not provide sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used alone as a diagnostic test for Alzheimer's disease, but when used in combination with clinical criteria, it improves the specificity of the diagnosis.

To evaluate the usefulness of the APOE genotype in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease among persons with dementia, we pooled data from 26 Alzheimer's disease centers in the United States for patients with pathological diagnoses of dementia of various causes in whom APOE genotypes were determined. Using the pathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease as the standard, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, the APOE genotype, and the clinical diagnosis and APOE genotype determined sequentially.

Methods

Subjects

We reviewed the clinical diagnoses and diagnoses obtained at autopsy in 3177 patients referred to 26 Alzheimer's disease centers for evaluation of dementia. The demographic variables recorded included age at the time of the clinical diagnosis of dementia, age at death, sex, and ethnic group.¹⁶ All clinical and pathological diagnoses were made without knowledge of the APOE genotype. Each center had obtained approval for the investigation from its institutional review board.

The NINCDS–ADRDA criteria,¹ the criteria of the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III)¹⁷ and the third edition, revised (DSM-III-R),¹⁸ or the criteria of Cummings and Benson,¹⁹ which are similar to one another, were used for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. These criteria are based on clinical, biochemical, and radiologic examinations. The criteria for the clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia, which were also similar, were those recommended by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences²⁰ or by Chui et al.²¹ For Parkinson's disease, the criteria of Hughes et al.²² were used in combination with those of DSM-III¹⁷ or DSM-III-R .¹⁸

Neuropathological Diagnosis

The primary and secondary neuropathological diagnoses included definite, probable, and possible Alzheimer's disease; definite Parkinson's disease; changes related to Parkinson's disease; cerebrovascular disease; Pick's disease; lobar atrophy without Pick's bodies; and other diseases. At most centers the diagnoses were based on the standardized neuropathological criteria from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD).²³ Some centers used the Khachaturian²⁴ criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, which are similar to the CERAD criteria. If neither were used, center investigators specified how the postmortem diagnosis was made.

APOE Genotype

The APOE genotypes of genomic DNA from blood or other tissues were determined at each center according to a standard protocol in which the DNA was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described by Hixson and Vernier.²⁵ Crude DNA extracts from paraffin-embedded sections were prepared as described by De Souza et al.²⁶ and used for the APOE restriction-fragment–isotyping reactions⁹9 in a single laboratory at Duke University. Samples that could not be genotyped by this method were retested with a second APOE-genotyping PCR protocol that amplifies the two allele-specific HhaI restriction sites separately.¹² Frozen tissues were processed and genotyped as previously described.⁹

Statistical Analysis

Clinical diagnoses were categorized either as probable or possible Alzheimer's disease¹ or as other types of dementia. Pathological diagnoses were categorized as Alzheimer's disease or other causes of dementia. The pathological definition of Alzheimer's disease included definite, probable, or possible Alzheimer's disease as the primary diagnosis^23,24 and definite or probable Alzheimer's disease²³ as the secondary diagnosis. Patients with the Lewy-body variant of Alzheimer's disease²⁷ were considered to have Alzheimer's disease, whereas those with the diagnosis of diffuse Lewy-body disease²⁸ were categorized as having other types of dementia.

The clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and the presence of an APOE 4 allele were used as tests in two-by-two contingency tables to determine the sensitivity (the proportion of patients with pathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease who met the clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease or who had an APOE 4 allele) and the specificity (the proportion of patients with other dementias who did not meet the clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease or who did not have an APOE 4 allele).²⁹ We also calculated the overall sensitivity and specificity when the clinical criteria and the APOE genotype were used in sequence by first identifying patients with probable or possible Alzheimer's disease on the basis of clinical criteria and then applying the results of APOE genotyping.³⁰

We used a mixed-effects logistic-regression model,³¹ with a random-effects term^32,33 for the contributing centers and fixed-effects terms for age, sex, and each clinical diagnosis, to estimate the pretest probability of pathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease. We estimated post-test probabilities for each patient by adding a fixed-effect term for the APOE genotype. The models were used to generate receiver-operating-characteristic curves ³⁴ plotting the sensitivity against the false positive rate (or 1 - specificity) at 12 arbitrary cutoff points, from 0.1 to 0.975. These cutoff points represented the distribution of probabilities for the pathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease on the basis of the clinical diagnosis adjusted for age, sex, racial or ethnic group, and center, first without and then with the APOE genotype. Areas under these curves were compared,³⁵ and the differences were calculated with 99 percent confidence intervals.

Results

Although data on 3177 patients were reviewed for eligibility, no clinical diagnosis was available for 252 (8 percent) and no pathological diagnosis was available for 143 (5 percent). In the remaining 2782 patients, APOE genotypes were available for 1850 (66 percent), and an additional 338 APOE genotypes were determined from analysis of frozen or fixed tissue, yielding complete information on 2188 of 3177 patients (69 percent).

There were 1108 (51 percent) women and 1080 men; 97 percent were white, 2 percent were black, and 1 percent were from other racial or ethnic groups. The mean (±SD) age at the time of clinical diagnosis was 72±10 years, and the mean age at death was 77±10 years. These characteristics did not differ significantly from those of the 594 patients for whom APOE genotypes were unavailable.

NINCDS–ADRDA criteria¹ were used for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in 78 percent of the patients, DSM-III or DSM-III-R criteria^17,18 in 3 percent, and other standardized criteria in 3 percent. The criteria used were not specified for the remaining 355 patients (16 percent). CERAD neuropathological criteria²³ for various forms of dementia were used in 62 percent, and Khachaturian criteria²⁴ for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease were used in 31 percent. Other criteria for dementia were used in a small number of patients (6 percent). The pathological criteria used were not specified for 28 patients (1 percent).

The sensitivity of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease was 93 percent, and the specificity was 55 percent (Table 1). Stratifying according to the type of clinical or pathological criteria used or the sex of the patient did not significantly change these values. The specificity, but not the sensitivity, varied significantly according to age (P<0.001). For example, in patients less than 66 years of age (the first quartile), the specificity of the clinical diagnosis was 66 percent and the sensitivity was 93 percent, whereas among those over the age of 79 years (the fourth quartile), the specificity was 23 percent and the sensitivity was 94 percent. Among whites, the sensitivity was slightly higher and the specificity was lower (P<0.01) than in patients from other racial or ethnic groups, but nonwhites represented only 3 percent of the patients. There were no significant differences between the centers.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Correspondence between the Clinical Diagnosis and the Pathological Diagnosis in 2188 Patients with Dementia.

 
The presence of one or more APOE 4 alleles as a test for the pathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease had a sensitivity of 65 percent and a specificity of 68 percent (Table 2). These results were similar among quartiles of age, between sexes, and among racial or ethnic groups, but there were slight differences between centers (P = 0.04). When the presence of the APOE 4/4 genotype was considered a positive test result, the sensitivity fell to 14 percent, but the specificity increased to 95 percent.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Correspondence between the Presence of the APOE e4 Allele and the Pathological Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease in 2188 Patients with Dementia.

 
The sensitivity and specificity for the clinical diagnosis did not change significantly when they were recalculated with stratification according to the individual APOE genotypes (Table 3). Though the specificity among patients with the APOE 2/2 genotype was higher than in other genotype groups, this group included only nine patients.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. Sensitivity and Specificity of the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease According to the APOE Genotype.

 
For the sequential testing procedure, the 1833 patients who met the clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease were identified and then the results of APOE genotyping were added. The presence of one or more APOE 4 alleles decreased the sensitivity to 61 percent but increased the specificity to 84 percent (Table 4).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 4. Sequential Use of APOE Genotyping among 1833 Patients Who Met the Clinical Criteria for Alzheimer's Disease.

 
Among the 1142 patients who met the clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease and had an APOE 4 allele, 66 (6 percent) had pathological diagnoses other than Alzheimer's disease — specifically, Parkinson's disease or changes related to Parkinson's disease (18 patients), cerebrovascular disease (14 patients), Pick's disease or other frontotemporal dementia (8 patients), no distinct brain abnormalities (8 patients), diffuse Lewy-body disease (5 patients), progressive subcortical gliosis (3 patients), striatonigral degeneration (2 patients), hippocampal sclerosis (2 patients), dementia associated with argyrophilic grains (2 patients), and multiple sclerosis, multisystem atrophy, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, and amyloid angiopathy with chronic meningitis (1 patient each).

Receiver-operating-characteristic curves indicated that adding information on the APOE genotype to the clinical diagnosis reduced the false positive rate (Figure 1). The areas under the curve were 0.80 for the age-adjusted APOE genotype alone, 0.84 for the multivariate-adjusted clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and 0.87 for the multivariate-adjusted clinical diagnosis plus the APOE genotype. The differences between the areas under the curves³⁶ representing the age-adjusted APOE genotype and the clinical diagnosis with the APOE genotype and the clinical diagnosis without it were significant (APOE genotype alone vs. clinical diagnosis alone, 4 percent; 99 percent confidence interval, 1 to 8 percent; and APOE genotype alone vs. APOE genotype combined with the clinical diagnosis, 8 percent; 99 percent confidence interval, 5 to 10 percent). Most important, the difference in the areas under the curves for the clinical diagnosis with the APOE genotype and the clinical diagnosis without it was significant (4 percent; 99 percent confidence interval, 2 to 6 percent; P<0.001).

View larger version (5K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Receiver-Operating-Characteristic Curves for the Age-Adjusted APOE Genotype Alone; the Clinical Diagnosis Adjusted for Age, Sex, and Center; and the Adjusted Clinical Diagnosis plus the APOE Genotype. The area under the curve was 0.80 for the age-adjusted APOE genotype, 0.84 for the multivariate-adjusted clinical diagnosis, and 0.87 for the multivariate-adjusted clinical diagnosis combined with the APOE genotype. The differences between the areas under the curve35 representing the age-adjusted APOE genotype and the clinical diagnosis with the APOE genotype and the clinical diagnosis without it were significant.

 
Discussion

The presence of the APOE 4 allele has been regarded as a risk factor for sporadic and familial late-onset Alzheimer's disease,^{9,10,11,37,38,39} a measure of genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease,^40,41,42 and an adjunct to NINCDS–ADRDA criteria for the diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease.^12,42 APOE genotyping has also been examined as a potential diagnostic test for Alzheimer's disease.^{12,13,14,15,16} We found that clinical criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease were highly sensitive, but their specificity was low, resulting in a high false positive rate. These values did not change when stratified according to individual APOE genotypes, contrary to previous reports.^12,13 However, sequential use of the APOE genotype with the clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease significantly improved the specificity of the clinical diagnosis, reducing the false positive rate but also decreasing the sensitivity. This finding implies that APOE genotyping might be reserved for patients who meet the clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease.

The sequential use of diagnostic tests as described in this study usually increases specificity while decreasing sensitivity, because the second diagnostic test is only used in those who test positive with the first test.³⁰ The false positive rate typically decreases or does not change, because the second test only identifies patients who do not have disease (a true negative result). The second test does not increase the detection of additional cases that were missed by the first test.

Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis confirmed the added value of information on the APOE genotype combined with the multivariate-adjusted clinical diagnosis, although the increase was smaller than that calculated with the two-by-two contingency tables. The two-by-two contingency tables limit the prior probability to a single proportion based on the total number of patients with pathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease. The multivariate models allowed us to determine the specific contributions of APOE genotyping to the clinical diagnosis over a range of prior probabilities.

Consensus statements^40,41 and reviews^42,43 of the topic have generally concluded that the value of APOE genotyping for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease has not been firmly established. The results of our study provide an indication of the way in which APOE genotyping might be used in patients with a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. We did not investigate whether APOE genotyping should replace any of the currently recommended laboratory procedures, such as brain imaging or psychological testing, nor did we address the stage of illness at which genotyping might be most useful.

The 66 patients who met clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease and had an APOE 4 allele but did not have confirmation of the disease at postmortem examination deserve further scrutiny because the disorders identified in these patients have been found in patients both with and without Alzheimer's disease at postmortem examination.

The study was limited by the lack of access to the test results of individual laboratories used to establish the criterion-based clinical diagnoses. Other than cognitive testing or formal neuropsychological evaluations, these tests, which include brain imaging and blood tests (e.g., liver and renal function, thyroid function, and complete blood count), are done primarily to identify other forms of dementia. The added value of any new test for Alzheimer's disease will need to be evaluated with currently recommended laboratory and diagnostic tests.

The patients whose data were used in this study were probably not typical of those encountered in many health care systems. Rather, they were representative of patients with dementia who were referred for medical evaluation or care at a specialized research center focused on Alzheimer's disease. Whether the clinical criteria and the APOE genotype would provide similar levels of sensitivity and specificity in more typical clinical settings needs to be determined. We do not know whether our results extend to blacks or patients of other racial or ethnic backgrounds because few of them were studied.

The proliferation of diagnostic tests for Alzheimer's disease implies that greater precision in the diagnosis is needed. APOE genotyping can improve the specificity of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, but it cannot be used to provide absolute confirmation. If the routine evaluation of patients with dementia includes genetic tests such as APOE genotyping, consideration of the implications for families of patients with a "positive" test result will be required.

Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AG10963, AG8702, AG05128, AG09997, AG10130, and AG10161), the Charles S. Robertson Memorial Gift, and the Blanchette Hooker Rockefeller Gift.

A patent on the use of APOE genotyping for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease has been issued to Duke University Medical Center. This patent has been licensed by Athena Neurosciences for use in diagnosis in patients with cognitive impairment.

We are indebted to Drs. Ana Diez Roux and Nicole Schupf for their careful review of and assistance with the manuscript.

^* Other participating investigators and institutions are listed in the Appendix.

Source Information

From the Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center (R.M., M.-X.T.), the Taub Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (R.M., M.-X.T.), and the Department of Medicine (S.S.), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York; Bryan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. (A.M.S., A.D.R.); Emory Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta (S.M.); Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush–Presbyterian–St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago (D.E.); the Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston (B.T.H.); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore (B.C.); and the National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Md. (C.H.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Mayeux at the Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, 630 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032.

References

1. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939-944. [Free Full Text]
2. Kukull WA, Larson EB, Reifler BV, Lampe TH, Yerby M, Hughes J. Interrater reliability of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. Neurology 1990;40:257-260. [Free Full Text]
3. Lopez OL, Swihart AA, Becker JT, et al. Reliability of NINCDS-ADRDA clinical criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1990;40:1517-1522. [Free Full Text]
4. Schofield PW, Tang M-X, Marder K, et al. Consistency of clinical diagnosis in a community-based longitudinal study of dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1995;45:2159-2164. [Free Full Text]
5. Morris JC, McKeel DW Jr, Fulling K, Torack RM, Berg L. Validation of clinical diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 1988;24:17-22. [CrossRef][Medline]
6. Burns A, Luthert P, Levy R, Jacoby R, Lantos P. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. BMJ 1990;301:1026-1026.
7. Wade JPH, Mirsen TR, Hachinski VC, Fisman M, Lau C, Merskey K. The clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol 1987;44:24-29. [Abstract]
8. Risse SC, Raskind MA, Nochlin D, et al. Neuropathological findings in patients with clinical diagnoses of probable Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry 1990;147:168-172. [Free Full Text]
9. Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel D, et al. Association of apolipoprotein E allele 4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1993;43:1467-1472. [Free Full Text]
10. Poirier J, Davignon J, Bouthillier D, Kogan S, Bertrand P, Gauthier S. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 1993;342:697-699. [CrossRef][Medline]
11. Mayeux R, Stern Y, Ottman R, et al. The apolipoprotein 4 allele in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 1993;34:752-754. [CrossRef][Medline]
12. Saunders AM, Hulette C, Welsh-Bohmer KA, et al. Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value of apolipoprotein-E genotyping for sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 1996;348:90-93. [CrossRef][Medline]
13. Apolipoprotein-E genotyping in diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 1996;348:483-484. [Medline]
14. Slooter AJC, Breteler MB, Ott A, Van Broeckhoven C, van Duijn CM. APOE genotyping in differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 1996;348:334-334. 
15. van Gool WA, Hijdra A. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease by apolipoprotein E genotyping. Lancet 1994;344:275-275. [CrossRef][Medline]
16. Census of population and housing, 1990: summary tape file 1: technical documentation. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census, 1991.
17. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed.: DSM-III. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1980.
18. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed. rev.: DSM-III-R. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
19. Dementia: definition, prevalence, classification, and approach to diagnosis. In: Cummings JL, Benson DF. Dementia: a clinical approach. 2nd ed. Boston: Butterworth–Heinemann, 1992:1-17.
20. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies: report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology 1993;43:250-260. [Free Full Text]
21. Chui HC, Victoroff JI, Margolin D, Jagust W, Shankle R, Katzman R. Criteria for the diagnosis of ischemic vascular dementia proposed by the State of California Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers. Neurology 1992;42:473-480. [Free Full Text]
22. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:181-184. [Free Full Text]
23. Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1991;41:479-486. [Free Full Text]
24. Khachaturian ZS. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol 1985;42:1097-1105. [Medline]
25. Hixson JE, Vernier DT. Restriction isotyping of human apolipoprotein E by gene amplification and cleavage with HhaI. J Lipid Res 1991;31:545-548. [Abstract]
26. De Souza AT, Hankins GR, Washington MK, Fine RL, Orton TC, Jirtle RL. Frequent loss of heterozygosity on 6q at the mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor locus in human hepatocellular tumors. Oncogene 1995;10:1725-1729. [Medline]
27. Hansen L, Salmon D, Galasko D, et al. The Lewy body variant of Alzheimer's disease: a clinical and pathologic entity. Neurology 1990;40:1-8. [Free Full Text]
28. Dickson DW, Davies P, Mayeux R, et al. Diffuse Lewy body disease: neuropathological and biochemical studies of six patients. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1987;75:8-15. [CrossRef][Medline]
29. Combining evidence from fourfold tables. In: Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1981:160-87.
30. Assessing the validity and reliability of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Gordis L. Epidemiology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1996:58-75.
31. Interpretation of the coefficients of the logistic regression model. In: Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley, 1989:38-81.
32. Halvorsen KT, Burdick E, Colditz GA, Frazier HS, Mosteller F. Combining results from independent investigations: meta-analysis in clinical research. In: Bailar JC III, Mosteller F, eds. Medical uses of statistics. 2nd ed. Boston: NEJM Books, 1992:413-26.
33. Friedenreich CM, Brant RF, Riboli E. Influence of methodologic factors in a pooled analysis of 13 case-control studies of colorectal cancer and dietary fiber. Epidemiology 1994;5:66-79. [Medline]
34. Fundamentals of accuracy analysis. In: Swets JA, Pickett RM. Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. New York: Academic Press, 1982:15-45.
35. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845. [CrossRef][Medline]
36. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988;240:1285-1293. [Free Full Text]
37. Maestre G, Ottman R, Stern Y, et al. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's disease: ethnic variation in genotypic risks. Ann Neurol 1995;37:254-259. [CrossRef][Medline]
38. Henderson AS, Easteal S, Jorm AF, et al. Apolipoprotein E allele 4, dementia, and cognitive decline in a population sample. Lancet 1995;346:1387-1390. [CrossRef][Medline]
39. Polvikoski T, Sulkava R, Haltia M, et al. Apolipoprotein E, dementia, and cortical deposition of -amyloid protein. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1242-1247. [Free Full Text]
40. American College of Medical Genetics/American Society on Human Genetics Working Group on ApoE and Alzheimer Disease. Statement on use of apolipoprotein E testing for Alzheimer disease. JAMA 1995;274:1627-1629. [Abstract]
41. National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association Working Group. Apolipoprotein E genotyping in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 1996;347:1091-1095. [Medline]
42. Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E genotyping in the differential diagnosis, not prediction, of Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 1995;38:6-14. [CrossRef][Medline]
43. Mayeux R, Schupf N. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's disease: the implications of progress in molecular medicine. Am J Public Health 1995;85:1280-1284. [Free Full Text]

The following investigators and Alzheimer's disease centers also participated in the study: Baylor College of Medicine: S. Appel, R. Doody, J. Kirkpatrick, J. Li; Case Western Reserve University: P. Whitehouse, D. Geldmacher, J. Stuckey; Columbia University: M. Shelanski, J. Goldman, B. Tycko; Duke University Medical Center: M. Pericak-Vance, C. Hulette; Emory University: M. Gearing, H. Kim; Harvard Medical School: J. Growdon, D. Reardon, T. Hedley-Whyte; Indiana University: B. Ghetti, M. Farlow, H. Hendrie, F. Unverzagt; Johns Hopkins University: D. Price, C. Kawas; Mayo Clinic: R. Petersen, S. Waring, J. Parisi, S. Thibodeau; Mount Sinai School of Medicine: K. Davis, D. Marin, H. Haroutunian, D. Greenberg; New York University: S. Ferris, B. Quinn, B. Reisberg, M. de Leon; Oregon Health Sciences University: J. Kaye, G. Murdoch, M. Ball; Rush–Presbyterian–St. Luke's: D. Bennett, E. Cochran; University of California–Davis: W. Jagust, B. Reed, W. Ellis; University of California–Los Angeles: H. Vinters, J. Cummings; University of California–San Diego: L. Thal, R. Katzman, D. Galasko, M. Sundsmo; University of Kansas: W. Koller, K. Lyons; University of Kentucky: W. Markesbery, D. Wekstein, M. Kindy; University of Michigan: S. Gilman, N. Foster, R. Albin, A. Sima, J. Fink; University of Pennsylvania: J. Trojanowski, C. Clark; University of Pittsburgh: S. DeKosky, M. Kamboh, R. Ferrell; University of Rochester: P. Coleman, D. Ryan; University of California–Irvine: C. Finch, J. Buckwalter, C. Miller; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center: R. Rosenberg, C. White III, M. Weiner; University of Washington–Seattle: M. Raskind, E. Peskind, J. Leverenz, D. Nochlin; Washington University Medical Center: J. Morris, E. Grant, A. Goate.

Abstract PDF Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:

• SALLOWAY, S., CORREIA, S. (2009). Alzheimer disease: Time to improve its diagnosis and treatment. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 76: 49-58 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ikonomovic, M. D., Klunk, W. E., Abrahamson, E. E., Mathis, C. A., Price, J. C., Tsopelas, N. D., Lopresti, B. J., Ziolko, S., Bi, W., Paljug, W. R., Debnath, M. L., Hope, C. E., Isanski, B. A., Hamilton, R. L., DeKosky, S. T. (2008). Post-mortem correlates of in vivo PiB-PET amyloid imaging in a typical case of Alzheimer's disease. Brain 131: 1630-1645 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stein, P. S., Desrosiers, M., Donegan, S. J., Yepes, J. F., Kryscio, R. J. (2007). Tooth loss, dementia and neuropathology in the Nun Study. Journal of the American Dental Association 138: 1314-1322 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blacker, D., Lovestone, S. (2006). Genetics and Dementia Nosology. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 19: 186-191 [Abstract]  
• McPherson, E. (2006). Genetic diagnosis and testing in clinical practice.. Clin Med Res 4: 123-129 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Huang, X., Chen, P., Kaufer, D. I., Troster, A. I., Poole, C. (2006). Apolipoprotein E and Dementia in Parkinson Disease: A Meta-analysis. Arch Neurol 63: 189-193 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jarvik, L. F., Blazer, D. (2005). Children of Alzheimer Patients: An Overview. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 18: 181-186  
• van der Flier, W M, Scheltens, P (2005). Use of laboratory and imaging investigations in dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76: v45-v52 [Full Text]  
• Luchsinger, J. A., Reitz, C., Honig, L. S., Tang, M. X., Shea, S., Mayeux, R. (2005). Aggregation of vascular risk factors and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Neurology 65: 545-551 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Devanand, D. P., Pelton, G. H., Zamora, D., Liu, X., Tabert, M. H., Goodkind, M., Scarmeas, N., Braun, I., Stern, Y., Mayeux, R. (2005). Predictive Utility of Apolipoprotein E Genotype for Alzheimer Disease in Outpatients With Mild Cognitive Impairment. Arch Neurol 62: 975-980 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vandenberghe, R, Tournoy, J (2005). Cognitive aging and Alzheimer's disease. Postgrad. Med. J. 81: 343-352 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wright, A F (2005). Neurogenetics II: complex disorders. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76: 623-631 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yue, L., Rasouli, N., Ranganathan, G., Kern, P. A., Mazzone, T. (2004). Divergent Effects of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} Agonists and Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} on Adipocyte ApoE Expression. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 47626-47632 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Silverman, D. H.S. (2004). Brain 18F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Dementias: Comparison with Perfusion SPECT and with Clinical Evaluations Lacking Nuclear Imaging. JNM 45: 594-607 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Devi, G., Williamson, J., Massoud, F., Anderson, K., Stern, Y., Devanand, D. P., Mayeux, R. (2004). A Comparison of Family History of Psychiatric Disorders Among Patients With Early- and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi. 16: 57-62 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Knopman, D. S., Boeve, B. F., Petersen, R. C. (2003). Essentials of the Proper Diagnoses of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and Major Subtypes of Dementia. Mayo Clin. Proc. 78: 1290-1308 [Abstract]  
• Clark, C. M., Karlawish, J. H.T. (2003). Alzheimer Disease: Current Concepts and Emerging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies. ANN INTERN MED 138: 400-410 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Petrella, J. R., Coleman, R. E., Doraiswamy, P. M. (2003). Neuroimaging and Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease: A Look to the Future. Radiology 226: 315-336 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tsuboi, Y., Josephs, K. A., Cookson, N., Dickson, D. W. (2003). APOE E4 is a determinant for Alzheimer type pathology in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 60: 240-245 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C.W., Lijmer, J. G. (2003). The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED 138: W1-W12 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C.W., Lijmer, J. G. (2003). The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration. Clin. Chem. 49: 7-18 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Squitti, R., Lupoi, D., Pasqualetti, P., Dal Forno, G., Vernieri, F., Chiovenda, P., Rossi, L., Cortesi, M., Cassetta, E., Rossini, P. M. (2002). Elevation of serum copper levels in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 59: 1153-1161 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Greicius, M D, Geschwind, M D, Miller, B L (2002). Presenile dementia syndromes: an update on taxonomy and diagnosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 72: 691-700 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Killiany, R. J., Hyman, B. T., Gomez-Isla, T., Moss, M. B., Kikinis, R., Jolesz, F., Tanzi, R., Jones, K., Albert, M. S. (2002). MRI measures of entorhinal cortex vs hippocampus in preclinical AD. Neurology 58: 1188-1196 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miech, R. A., Breitner, J. C.S., Zandi, P. P., Khachaturian, A. S., Anthony, J. C., Mayer, L. (2002). Incidence of AD may decline in the early 90s for men, later for women: The Cache County study. Neurology 58: 209-218 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hedera, P. (2001). Ethical Principles and Pitfalls of Genetic Testing for Dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 14: 213-221 [Abstract]  
• Neumann, P. J., Hammitt, J. K., Mueller, C., Fillit, H. M., Hill, J., Tetteh, N. A., Kosik, K. S. (2001). Public Attitudes About Genetic Testing For Alzheimer's Disease. Health Aff (Millwood) 20: 252-264 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Knopman, D. S., DeKosky, S. T., Cummings, J. L., Chui, H., Corey-Bloom, J., Relkin, N., Small, G. W., Miller, B., Stevens, J. C. (2001). Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 56: 1143-1153 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Knopman, D. (2001). Cerebrospinal Fluid {beta}-Amyloid and Tau Proteins for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease. Arch Neurol 58: 349-350 [Full Text]  
• Andreasen, N., Minthon, L., Davidsson, P., Vanmechelen, E., Vanderstichele, H., Winblad, B., Blennow, K. (2001). Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-A{beta}42 as Diagnostic Markers for Alzheimer Disease in Clinical Practice. Arch Neurol 58: 373-379 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• , S. (2001). Recent advances: Geriatric. BMJ 322: 86-89 [Full Text]  
• LIDDELL, M. B., LOVESTONE, S., OWEN, M. J. (2001). Genetic risk of Alzheimer's disease: advising relatives. Br. J. Psychiatry 178: 7-11 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bigler, E. D., Lowry, C. M., Anderson, C. V., Johnson, S. C., Terry, J., Steed, M. (2000). Dementia, Quantitative Neuroimaging, and Apolipoprotein E Genotype. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21: 1857-1868 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Plassman, B. L., Havlik, R. J., Steffens, D. C., Helms, M. J., Newman, T. N., Drosdick, D., Phillips, C., Gau, B. A., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Burke, J. R., Guralnik, J. M., Breitner, J. C. S. (2000). Documented head injury in early adulthood and risk of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Neurology 55: 1158-1166 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Albert, M. S., Drachman, D. A. (2000). Alzheimer's disease: What is it, how many people have it, and why do we need to know?. Neurology 55: 166-168 [Full Text]  
• Ganguli, M., Chandra, V., Kamboh, M. I., Johnston, J. M., Dodge, H. H., Thelma, B. K., Juyal, R. C., Pandav, R., Belle, S. H., DeKosky, S. T. (2000). Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism and Alzheimer Disease: The Indo-US Cross-National Dementia Study. Arch Neurol 57: 824-830 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Riley, K. P., Snowdon, D. A., Saunders, A. M., Roses, A. D., Mortimer, J. A., Nanayakkara, N. (2000). Cognitive Function and Apolipoprotein E in Very Old Adults: Findings From the Nun Study. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 55: 69S-75 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Steffens, D. C., Plassman, B. L., Helms, M. J., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Newman, T. T., Breitner, J. C. S. (2000). APOE and AD concordance in twin pairs as predictors of AD in first-degree relatives. Neurology 54: 593-593 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• O'Donnell, H. C., Rosand, J., Knudsen, K. A., Furie, K. L., Segal, A. Z., Chiu, R. I., Ikeda, D., Greenberg, S. M. (2000). Apolipoprotein E Genotype and the Risk of Recurrent Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage. NEJM 342: 240-245 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sacco, R. L. (2000). Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage. NEJM 342: 276-279 [Full Text]  
• Prince, M., Lovestone, S., Cervilla, J., Joels, S., Powell, J., Russ, C., Mann, A. (2000). The association between APOE and dementia does not seem to be mediated by vascular factors. Neurology 54: 397-397 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sousa, M. M., Berglund, L., Saraiva, M. J. (2000). Transthyretin in high density lipoproteins: association with apolipoprotein A-I. J. Lipid Res. 41: 58-65 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Munoz, D. G., Feldman, H. (2000). Causes of Alzheimer's disease. CMAJ 162: 65-72 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Greenberg, S. M., Tennis, M. K., Brown, L. B., Gomez-Isla, T., Hayden, D. L., Schoenfeld, D. A., Walsh, K. L., Corwin, C., Daffner, K. R., Friedman, P., Meadows, M.-E., Sperling, R. A., Growdon, J. H. (2000). Donepezil Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Randomized Crossover Study. Arch Neurol 57: 94-99 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Alvarez, R., Alvarez, V., Lahoz, C. H, Martinez, C., Pena, J., Sanchez, J. M, Guisasola, L. M, Salas-Puig, J., Moris, G., Vidal, J. A, Ribacoba, R., Menes, B. B, Uria, D., Coto, E. (1999). Angiotensin converting enzyme and endothelial nitric oxide synthase DNA polymorphisms and late onset Alzheimer's disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 67: 733-736 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tsuang, D., Larson, E. B., Bowen, J., McCormick, W., Teri, L., Nochlin, D., Leverenz, J. B., Peskind, E. R., Lim, A., Raskind, M. A., Thompson, M. L., Mirra, S. S., Gearing, M., Schellenberg, G. D., Kukull, W. (1999). The Utility of Apolipoprotein E Genotyping in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease in a Community-Based Case Series. Arch Neurol 56: 1489-1495 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (1999). Goals and Objectives for Molecular Pathology Education in Residency Programs. J. Mol. Diagn. 1: 5-15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Massoud, F., Devi, G., Stern, Y., Lawton, A., Goldman, J. E., Liu, Y., Chin, S. S., Mayeux, R. (1999). A Clinicopathological Comparison of Community-Based and Clinic-Based Cohorts of Patients With Dementia. Arch Neurol 56: 1368-1373 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Andreasen, N., Minthon, L., Clarberg, A., Davidsson, P., Gottfries, J., Vanmechelen, E., Vanderstichele, H., Winblad, B., Blennow, K. (1999). Sensitivity, specificity, and stability of CSF-tau in AD in a community-based patient sample. Neurology 53: 1488-1488 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hegele, R. A., Merz, J. F., Silverman, L. M. (1999). Uncovering Rare Mutations: An Unforeseen Complication of Routine Genotyping of APOE • J. Merz and L. Silverman provide the following comment:. Clin. Chem. 45: 1579-1581 [Full Text]  
• Richards, S. S., Hendrie, H. C. (1999). Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment of Alzheimer Disease: A Guide for the Internist. Arch Intern Med 159: 789-798 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Drachman, D. A., Newell, K. L. (1999). Case 12-1999- A 67-Year-Old Man with Three Years of Dementia. NEJM 340: 1269-1277 [Full Text]  
• Growdon, J. H. (1999). Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease. Arch Neurol 56: 281-283 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barker, W., Harwood, D., Duara, R., Mullan, M., Fallin, D., St. George Hyslop, P., Rogaeva, E., Song, Y., Farkas, B. L., Grant, W. B., Mendez, H. A., Tang, M.-X., Mayeux, R. (1998). The APOE-{epsilon}4 Allele and Alzheimer Disease Among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. JAMA 280: 1661-1663 [Full Text]  
• Price, D. L., Sisodia, S. S., Borchelt, D. R. (1998). Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Human Illness and Transgenic Models. Science 282: 1079-1083 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Growdon, J. H. (1998). Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer Disease. Arch Neurol 55: 1053-1054 [Full Text]