FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 339:1339 October 29, 1998 Number 18

Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article by Estacio, R. O.

The Effect of Nisoldipine as Compared with Enalapril on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes and Hypertension . On page 645, the last two lines of the Results paragraph of the Abstract should have read, "(risk ratio, 7.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 21.4)," not "risk ratio, 9.5," as printed. Also, on page 647, the sentence that begins 11 lines from the bottom of the right-hand column should have read, "Ninety-nine patients in the enalapril group took a beta-blocker, as compared with 89 patients in the nisoldipine group (P = 0.35)," not "(P = 0.035)," as printed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Brandle, M., Davidson, M. B., Schriger, D. L., Lorber, B., Herman, W. H. (2003). Cost Effectiveness of Statin Therapy for the Primary Prevention of Major Coronary Events in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 26: 1796-1801 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haffner, S. M., Goldberg, R. B. (2002). New Strategies for the Treatment of Diabetic Dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care 25: 1237-1239 [Full Text]