Chemotherapy Compared with Autologous or Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation in the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission
Peter A. Cassileth, M.D., David P. Harrington, Ph.D., Frederick R. Appelbaum, M.D., Hillard M. Lazarus, M.D., Jacob M. Rowe, M.D., Elisabeth Paietta, Ph.D., Cheryl Willman, M.D., David D. Hurd, M.D., John M. Bennett, M.D., Karl G. Blume, M.D., David R. Head, M.D., and Peter H. Wiernik, M.D.
Background In young adults with acute myeloid leukemia, intensivechemotherapy during the initial remission improves the long-termoutcome, but the role of bone marrow transplantation is uncertain.We compared high-dose cytarabine with autologous or allogeneicmarrow transplantation during the first remission of acute myeloidleukemia.
Methods Previously untreated adolescents and adults 16 to 55years of age who had acute myeloid leukemia received standardinduction chemotherapy. After complete remission had been achieved,idarubicin (two days) and cytarabine (five days) were administered.Patients with histocompatible siblings were offered allogeneicmarrow transplantation, whereas the remaining patients wererandomly assigned to receive a single course of high-dose cytarabineor transplantation of autologous marrow treated with perfosfamide(4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide). Oral busulfan and intravenouscyclophosphamide were used as preparative regimens for bothallogeneic and autologous marrow transplantation. The end pointswere survival from the time of complete remission and disease-freesurvival.
Results In an intention-to-treat analysis, we found no significantdifferences in disease-free survival among patients receivinghigh-dose chemotherapy, those undergoing autologous bone marrowtransplantation, and those undergoing allogeneic marrow transplantation.The median follow-up was four years. Survival after completeremission was somewhat better after chemotherapy than afterautologous marrow transplantation (P=0.05). There was a marginaladvantage in terms of overall survival with chemotherapy ascompared with allogeneic marrow transplantation (P=0.04).
Conclusions A postinduction course of high-dose cytarabine canprovide equivalent disease-free survival and somewhat betteroverall survival than autologous marrow transplantation in adultswith acute myeloid leukemia.
The rate of complete remission for adults with acute myeloidleukemia is approximately 65 percent overall and decreases withincreasing age and the presence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities.1,2With postremission therapy, disease-free survival at five yearsranges from 10 to 15 percent with low-dose maintenance therapy2,3to 25 to 35 percent with intensive courses of chemotherapy,usually incorporating high-dose cytarabine.4,5,6 In young patients,further escalation of postremission therapy is feasible, providedautologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells can be transplantedto repopulate the ablated bone marrow. Despite the complicationsof graft-versus-host disease, a number of studies suggest thatlong-term outcome is improved by allogeneic marrow transplantationduring the first complete remission.7,8,9,10 Similarly, despitethe potential risk of reinfusing leukemic cells during autologousmarrow transplantation, both nonrandomized11,12,13,14 and randomized15,16studies have reported better long-term disease-free survivalafter autologous transplantation than after conventional chemotherapy.Other studies of adults10,17 and children,18,19 however, havefailed to confirm improvement with autologous marrow transplantation.The unresolved question of what constitutes optimal therapyin adults with acute myeloid leukemia in the first completeremission led the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG),the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), and the Cancer and LeukemiaGroup B (CALGB) to conduct an intergroup study of postremissiontherapy. We assigned patients with histocompatible siblingsto allogeneic marrow transplantation and randomly assigned theremaining patients to high-dose cytarabine or autologous marrowtransplantation.
Methods
Patients and Therapies
The study opened in February 1990 and closed in February 1995.The data were analyzed as of August 1997. Eligible patientswere 16 to 55 years old and had untreated acute myeloid leukemiaof FrenchAmericanBritish (FAB) types M0 to M7,20,21confirmed by centralized review of the bone marrow morphologyand cytochemistry, immunophenotyping, and karyotype analysis.Eligibility required the absence of any illness that would precludethe possibility of subsequent marrow transplantation, adequaterenal and hepatic function, no uncontrolled infection, a normalcardiac ejection fraction, and signed informed consent. Inductiontherapy consisted of idarubicin (12 mg per square meter of body-surfacearea per day given intravenously for three days) and intravenouscytarabine (25 mg per square meter, followed by 100 mg per squaremeter per day, infused continuously for seven days). Bone marrowobtained by aspiration and biopsy was evaluated on day 14; ifresidual leukemic blasts were seen, a second identical courseof chemotherapy was administered. Patients in whom completeremission did not occur after one or two courses of therapywere withdrawn from the study. After recovery from the toxiceffects of induction therapy and before randomization, all patientsin complete remission received another course of induction therapyat the same daily doses, but with only two days of idarubicinand five days of cytarabine. To proceed with scheduled therapyor randomization, patients had to be in complete remission andhave no lingering complications of prior chemotherapy, a normalcardiac ejection fraction, good performance status, adequatehepatic and renal function, no persistent infection requiringtreatment with antibiotics, and no evidence of central nervoussystem leukemia. After complete remission, and during or afterthe consolidation phase, the availability of histocompatibledonors was evaluated. Patients with a genotypically or phenotypicallyHLA-matched or single-antigenmismatched family memberwho was available to serve as a donor were offered allogeneicmarrow transplantation. Randomization to autologous marrow transplantationor high-dose cytarabine therapy was stratified according toage (45 vs. >45 years), FAB type (M1, M2, M3, or M4 vs. M0,M5, M6, or M7), the number of courses of induction therapy administeredto achieve complete remission (one vs. two), and karyotype category favorable: t(8;21), t(15;17), or inv(16); intermediate:normal or having a single numerical abnormality other than thoseclassified as unfavorable; or unfavorable: 5q, 5,7q, 7, abnormalities of chromosome 9 or 11, orthree or more clonal abnormalities.22 The randomization schemewas based on permuted blocks within strata and additional balancingwithin institutional sites.
For patients who were to receive autologous marrow transplantation,harvesting of bone marrow stem cells and perfosfamide (4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide)treatment before cryopreservation were accomplished with publishedtechniques.14,23,24 The protocol specified that high-dose cytarabineor marrow transplantation was to begin within three months afterthe beginning of complete remission, but longer delays werepermitted to allow patients to fulfill eligibility requirementsfor this step. These criteria were applied uniformly in allpostremission therapy groups. Patients randomly assigned tohigh-dose cytarabine received a single course of cytarabineconsisting of 3 g per square meter infused intravenously overa 3-hour period every 12 hours for 12 doses. The preparativeregimen for both autologous and allogeneic marrow transplantationconsisted of busulfan at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of bodyweight given orally every six hours over four days (16 doses)on days 9 through 6 and cyclophosphamide at adose of 50 mg per kilogram given intravenously over a one-hourperiod daily for four days on days 5 through 2.Bone marrow cells were reinfused on day 0. Prophylaxis againstgraft-versus-host disease was not specified, but a limited rangeof permissible options was defined. Complete remission and relapsewere defined according to standard criteria.25
Statistical Analysis
Disease-free survival was defined as the time between documentedcomplete remission and relapse or death from any cause. Assignmentto allogeneic marrow transplantation was made at the study sitewhen a suitable donor was available. The time from the assignmentof a patient to notification of the coordinating center variedwidely, as compared with the timely reporting of patients tobe randomly assigned to high-dose cytarabine or autologous marrowtransplantation. To avoid any bias that this difference mightintroduce in comparing the three postremission therapies, survivalwas measured from the time of documented complete remissionfor all patients. Although data on allogeneic marrow transplantationare presented and analyzed, patients were assigned to this treatmenton the basis of donor availability rather than by randomization.Therefore, the primary comparison of interest, defined at theoutset of the trial, was that between the two randomly assignedpostremission therapies, autologous marrow transplantation andhigh-dose cytarabine.
Because long-term cure occurs in a small subgroup of patientswith this disease, the study was designed according to a BerksonGagecure-rate model.26 Accrual and follow-up goals were set to providethe study with at least 80 percent power to detect a 50 percentincrease in the cure rate and a 50 percent increase in mediandisease-free survival among the patients destined to relapse,with the use of a generalized Wilcoxon 5 percent two-sided test.27The study design called for a total of approximately 130 patientsrandomly assigned to each of the two therapies autologousmarrow transplantation and high-dose cytarabine with180 relapses expected in order to achieve the desired power.The protocol provided for interim analyses after every 45 relapses,or at 25 percent increments in the available data on the endpoint of disease-free survival. Interim analyses used an O'BrienFlemingboundary28 to determine critical values for interim significancetests. The study was unblinded at the third interim analysis,when it became apparent that the anticipated differences indisease-free survival would not emerge, and that significantdifferences in survival existed between the groups.
For time-to-event comparisons for outcomes other than the mainend point, the log-rank statistic29 was used for purposes ofcomparability with the literature. In survival and disease-freesurvival curves, all patients who were eligible for initialstudy entry who had a documented complete remission were analyzedon an intention-to-treat basis, according to the treatment assignedafter remission, regardless of whether they received the intendedtherapy. Survival and disease-free survival curves were estimatedby the method of Kaplan and Meier.30 The independence of rowand column effects in contingency tables was tested with eitherFisher's exact test or exact methods for ordered categoricaldata.31
Results
Accrual of Patients
Of the 808 patients who entered the study, 36 were ineligiblebecause they were given the wrong diagnosis, the cardiac ejectionfraction was low or unmeasured, slides were not submitted forcentral review, or follow-up data were missing. Of the remaining772 patients, 32 could not be evaluated: 19 because completeremission was not documented, 7 because of missing follow-updata, 5 because the patient withdrew before completing therapy,and 1 because central nervous system leukemia was detected shortlyafter entry. Thus, 740 of the 808 patients (92 percent) wereeligible for induction therapy.
Induction Therapy
Of the 740 patients who were eligible for induction therapy,518 (70 percent) had a complete remission, with no significantdifferences among the various FAB subtypes. Eighty percent ofthe remissions occurred after a single course of induction therapy,and the frequency of deaths related to the induction therapywas 7 percent. Centralized review yielded data on karyotypesthat could be evaluated for 572 patients (77 percent). The threekaryotype subgroups correlated with the likelihood of completeremission: 83 percent for the favorable types, 74 percent forthe intermediate category, and 56 percent for unfavorable karyotypes(P<0.001). The rate of complete remission was essentiallythe same for all patients whose karyotypes were successfullydetermined and for those whose karyotypes were unknown, suggestingno selection bias due to unidentified karyotypes.
Initial postremission therapy (two days of idarubicin plus fivedays of cytarabine) was associated with neutropenia (definedas <500 granulocytes per cubic millimeter) lasting threeweeks; patients with this complication virtually always requiredhospitalization for febrile neutropenia, but there were no deaths.
Of the 518 patients who entered a complete remission, 172 wereremoved from the study before randomization or assignment topostremission therapy. The principal causes were refusal tocontinue in the study, persistent medical problems after inductiontherapy, and relapse before randomization. This group did notdiffer in the distribution of karyotype categories from the346 patients who remained in the analysis of postremission therapy(data not shown).
Postremission Therapy
The 4-year survival rate, estimated from study entry, amongall 740 eligible patients who could be evaluated was 35 percent;the median survival was 19 months. The number of patients randomlyassigned to each therapy (high-dose cytarabine or autologousmarrow transplantation) was approximately the same as the numberassigned to allogeneic marrow transplantation (Table 1). Nosignificant differences among these three groups were foundregarding age, sex, number of courses of therapy required toachieve complete remission, FAB type, or karyotype classification.Among the patients assigned to autologous marrow transplantationor high-dose cytarabine, the median time from study entry torandomization was 15.6 weeks (range, 5.6 to 28.0). The mediantime from complete remission to the initiation of postremissiontherapy was 14.6 weeks for autologous marrow transplantationand 14.1 weeks for allogeneic marrow transplantation, as comparedwith 12.4 weeks for high-dose cytarabine. The times to marrowtransplantation were significantly longer than the times tochemotherapy (P=0.001), regardless of whether the differenceswere calculated on the basis of the date of transplantationor by censoring data on patients scheduled for autologous orallogeneic marrow transplantation at the time they were withdrawnfrom the study.
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients Assigned to Postremission Therapy.
Of 116 patients assigned to autologous marrow transplantation,only 63 (54 percent) received the intended therapy, for thereasons shown in Table 1. In comparison, nearly all patientsassigned to high-dose cytarabine (91 percent) and 81 percentof those given allogeneic marrow received the intended therapy.Follow-up data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis,including all patients in their assigned groups. At the timeof this analysis (August 1997), the median follow-up of the135 patients remaining in continuous complete remission wasapproximately 4 years (minimum, 10 months; maximum, 7.1 years).By August 1998, one year after the analysis of these data, noadditional relapses had occurred. Two patients died while incomplete remission (one patient had refused autologous marrowtransplantation, and the other died of severe graft-versus-hostdisease after allogeneic marrow transplantation).
The distribution of karyotypes (Table 1) did not differ significantlyamong treatment groups (P=0.38). Failure to receive the assignedtherapy did not cause an imbalance in the distribution of karyotypicabnormalities (data not shown) among the remaining patientswho received treatment as scheduled. Long-term and disease-freesurvival (data not shown) for all randomly and directly assignedpatients correlated with the prognostic grouping of the karyotypes.No firm conclusions can be drawn, however, about the relationbetween karyotype groupings and the long-term results of thethree postremission therapies, because this study was not designedto measure this correlation.
Table 2 and Figure 1 show disease-free survival rates in thethree postremission treatment groups. The median disease-freesurvival in the group treated with autologous marrow transplantationwas 14 months; a life-table estimate of disease-free survival(±2 SD) at 4 years was 35±9 percent. The respectivefigures in the high-dose cytarabine group were 18 months and35±9 percent (P=0.77). Neither result differed significantlyfrom the results with allogeneic marrow transplantation (mediandisease-free survival, 32 months; life-table estimate, 43±10percent at 4 years). Delays in the period from remission totransplantation (during which there were 2 relapses in the chemotherapygroup, 15 in the autologous marrow group, and 9 in the allogeneicmarrow group) could have decreased disease-free survival amongpatients scheduled for marrow transplantation (Table 1). Alternatively,this difference in the number of relapses before the scheduledprocedure could have been due to the study design, which allowedpatients in complete remission to begin high-dose cytarabinewithout the bone marrow evaluation that was mandated beforeallogeneic or autologous marrow transplantation. As shown inTable 2 and Figure 2, survival was better after high-dose cytarabinethan after autologous marrow transplantation (P=0.05). In comparisonwith the group given allogeneic marrow, the group given chemotherapyhad marginally better survival (P=0.04), and there were no significantdifferences in survival between patients receiving allogeneicmarrow and those receiving autologous marrow.
Figure 2. Probability of Survival According to Postremission Therapy.
Discussion
With the regimens used in this study of adolescents and adultsin a first complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia, theresults with autologous marrow transplantation were no betterthan those with postremission high-dose chemotherapy alone,when the data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.Relapses were most frequent among patients assigned to high-dosecytarabine (61 percent), less common among those assigned toautologous marrow transplantation (48 percent), and least commonamong those assigned to allogeneic marrow transplantation (29percent) (Table 2). Conversely, the treatment-related mortality(i.e., mortality less than 100 days after the beginning of therapy)among patients remaining in complete remission was highest forallogeneic marrow transplantation (21 percent), lowest for high-dosecytarabine (3 percent), and intermediate for autologous marrowtransplantation (14 percent). The inverse relation of theseoutcomes neutralized the competing effects of the three regimens,which explains the lack of difference in disease-free survival.Nevertheless, survival was better after high-dose cytarabinethan after autologous marrow transplantation (P=0.05). In contrast,two large, randomized trials of autologous marrow transplantationin similar patients found a significant improvement in disease-freesurvival with marrow transplantation. Zittoun et al.15 reportedan estimated disease-free survival of 48±5 percent atfour years with autologous transplantation, as compared with30±4 percent with chemotherapy (P=0.04). In the studyby Burnett et al.,16 disease-free survival seven years afterautologous marrow transplantation was 53 percent, as comparedwith 40 percent after chemotherapy (P=0.04). Like the currentstudy, both these studies included a relatively large numberof patients and analyzed data on an intention-to-treat basis.Unlike the patients in our study, however, the patients in thesetwo studies received at least one cycle of intensive postremissionchemotherapy before randomization, and the pretransplantationregimen included total-body irradiation instead of busulfan.Autologous marrow transplantation may be less effective in patientswith greater burdens of undetected disease and therefore mightbest be used after intensive postremission chemotherapy ratherthan as a substitute for it.
Like us, others have found that autologous marrow transplantationdoes not substantially improve survival in comparison with chemotherapy.15,16The lack of consistency between the results for disease-freesurvival and overall survival may reflect, in part, the benefitof marrow transplantation after an initial relapse. Substantiallymore patients who had relapses after chemotherapy underwentsalvage autologous or allogeneic marrow transplantation thanpatients who relapsed after receiving autologous or allogeneicmarrow transplantation as postremission therapy (Table 3). Moreover,for each postremission-therapy group, approximately the samepercentage of patients who were treated with marrow transplantationafter an initial relapse are currently alive. Since the follow-upof these patients after salvage transplantation is relativelyshort, continued follow-up is important to determine whetherthe survival curves remain stable.
Table 3. Frequency of Salvage Bone Marrow Transplantation after Relapse, According to Postremission Therapy.
The failure of a substantial fraction of patients to remainin the study and receive the assigned treatment is problematicfor any study of postremission therapy15,16,17,18,19; in publishedseries, 33 to 50 percent of patients in initial complete remissionwere removed from the study (Table 4). Although 83 to 97 percentof patients randomly assigned to chemotherapy received the scheduledtherapy, only 54 to 87 percent received the intended autologousmarrow transplantation (Table 4).
Table 4. Patients Completing Assigned Therapy in Randomized Trials of Bone Marrow Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
In our study, no significant differences in the distributionof known prognostic factors were found between those who continuedin the study and those who refused to proceed to the next stepin the treatment. To restrict the analysis to patients who actuallyreceived the intended therapy would have been misleading. Suchpatients had a median disease-free survival of 28 months andan estimated rate of disease-free survival of 45 percent 4 yearsafter autologous marrow transplantation, with correspondingfigures of 34 months and 47 percent for allogeneic marrow transplantation.For autologous marrow transplantation, the median survival hasnot yet been reached and the 4-year survival rate was 55 percent,as compared with a median survival of 41 months and a 48 percentrate of 4-year survival for allogeneic marrow transplantation.
These results resemble those reported in single-institutionstudies of marrow transplantation and may reflect selectionbias when patients are excluded because of their refusal oftherapy, relapse before marrow transplantation, or medical ineligibility.Conversely, the current and previous studies can be viewed asflawed assessments of the value of autologous marrow transplantation,because so many patients never received it. The intention-to-treatanalysis does, however, provide a comparison between treatmentsoffered to patients but not necessarily accepted by them, ascan occur in clinical practice.
Our results indicate that autologous marrow transplantationearly after the induction of a first remission with a preparatoryregimen that does not include total-body irradiation was ofno benefit. Chemotherapy with a single course of high-dose cytarabinewas associated with the best survival after complete remission.This result may have been due to the benefits of salvage autologousor allogeneic marrow transplantation in patients who relapsedafter receiving high-dose cytarabine. Alternative strategies,including measures to ensure the completion of the assignedtherapy, the postponement of transplantation until after intensiveconsolidation therapy, or different techniques, such as theuse of peripheral blood rather than bone marrow stem cells inautologous transplantation,12,32,33 could alter the outcomeof future trials.
Supported by Public Health Service grants (CA23318, CA38926,CA14548, CA11083, CA21076, CA12213, CA32102, CA20319, CA46368,CA66636, and CA21115) from the National Cancer Institute, theNational Institutes of Health, and the Department of Healthand Human Services. This study was coordinated by the EasternCooperative Oncology Group (Robert L. Comis, M.D., chair).
We are indebted to Ms. Susan Allen of the Eastern CooperativeOncology Group statistical office for her diligent efforts inthe detailed review of data on patients and compliance withthe protocol.
Source Information
From the University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami (P.A.C.); DanaFarber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston (D.P.H.); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (F.R.A.); Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland (H.M.L.); University of Rochester Cancer Center, Rochester, N.Y. (J.M.R., J.M.B.); Albert Einstein Cancer Center at Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, N.Y. (E.P., P.H.W.); University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque (C.W.); Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, N.C. (D.D.H.); Stanford University Hospital, Stanford, Calif. (K.G.B.); and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn. (D.R.H.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Cassileth at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1475 NW 12th Ave., Miami, FL 33136.
References
Weinstein HJ, Griffin JD. Acute myelogenous leukemia. In: Handin RI, Lux SE, Stossel TP, eds. Blood: principles & practice of hematology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1995:543-74.
Leith CP, Kopecky KJ, Godwin J, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses for standard chemotherapy: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood 1997;89:3323-3329. [Free Full Text]
Mayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA, et al. Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1994;31:896-903.
Cassileth PA, Lynch E, Hines JD, et al. Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 1992;79:1924-1930. [Free Full Text]
Schiller G, Gajewski J, Territo M, et al. Long-term outcome of high-dose cytarabine-based consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood 1992;80:2977-2982. [Free Full Text]
Dinsmore R, Kirkpatrick D, Flomenberg N, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1984;63:649-656. [Free Full Text]
Copelan EA, Biggs JC, Thompson JM, et al. Treatment for acute myelocytic leukemia with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation following preparation with BuCy2. Blood 1991;78:838-843. [Free Full Text]
Schiller GJ, Nimer SD, Territo MC, Ho WG, Champlin RE, Gajewski JL. Bone marrow transplantation versus high-dose cytarabine-based consolidation chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia in first remission. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:41-46. [Abstract]
Lowenberg B, Verdonck LJ, Dekker AW, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: results of a Dutch prospective study. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:287-294. [Abstract]
Sierra J, Brunet S, Granena A, et al. Feasibility and results of bone marrow transplantation after remission induction and intensification chemotherapy in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1353-1363. [Free Full Text]
Schiller G, Mittal-Henkle A, Lill M, Lee M, Territo M. Transplantation of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells procured after high-dose cytarabine/G-CSF based consolidation for adults with acute myelogenous leukemia in first remission. Blood 1995;86:Suppl 1:99a-99a.abstract
Stein AS, O'Donnell MR, Chai A, et al. In vivo purging with high-dose cytarabine followed by high-dose chemoradiotherapy and reinfusion of unpurged bone marrow for adult acute myelogenous leukemia in first complete remission. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2206-2216. [Abstract]
Cassileth PA, Andersen J, Lazarus HM, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:314-319. [Free Full Text]
Zittoun RA, Mandelli F, Willemze R, et al. Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 1995;332:217-223. [Free Full Text]
Burnett AK, Goldstone AH, Stevens RMF, et al. Randomised comparison of addition of autologous bone-marrow transplantation to intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission: results of MRC AML 10 trial. Lancet 1998;351:700-708. [CrossRef][Medline]
Harousseau JL, Cahn JY, Pignon B, et al. Comparison of autologous bone marrow transplantation and intensive chemotherapy as postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 1997;90:2978-2986. [Free Full Text]
Ravindranath Y, Yeager AM, Chang MN, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation versus intensive consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in childhood. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1428-1434. [Free Full Text]
Woods WG, Neudorf S, Gold S, et al. Aggressive post-remission chemotherapy is better than autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and allogeneic BMT is superior to both in children with acute myeloid leukemia. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996;15:368a. abstract.
Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukemias: French-American-British (FAB) Co-operative Group. Br J Haematol 1976;33:451-458. [Medline]
Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia: a report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:620-625.
Dastugue N, Payen C, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, et al. Prognostic significance of karyotype in de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 1995;9:1491-1498. [Medline]
Rosenfeld C, Shadduck RK, Przepiorka D, Mangan KF, Colvin M. Autologous bone marrow transplantation with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide purged marrows for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in late remission or early relapse. Blood 1989;74:1159-1164. [Free Full Text]
Yeager AM, Kaizer H, Santos GW, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, using ex vivo marrow treatment with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. N Engl J Med 1986;315:141-147. [Abstract]
Cheson BD, Cassileth PA, Head DR, et al. Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:813-819. [Abstract]
Berkson J, Gage RP. Survival curves for cancer patients following treatment. J Am Stat Assoc 1952;47:501-15.
Prentice RL. Linear rank tests with right censored data. Biometrika 1978;65:167-179. [Free Full Text]
O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979;35:549-556. [CrossRef][Medline]
Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:163-170. [Medline]
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.
Cox DR, Sneel EJ. The analysis of binary data. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1989.
Sanz MA, de la Rubia J, Sanz GF, et al. Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide followed by autologous blood stem-cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia in first complete remission: a report from a single institution. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:1661-1667. [Free Full Text]
Linker CA, Ries CA, Damon LE, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. Blood 1995;86:Suppl 1:99a-99a.abstract
Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Kanda Y., Miwa A., Togawa A., Perez-Calvo J., Brugarolas A., Suzuki R., Seto M., Morishima Y., Gorin N.-C., Labopin M., Woods W. G., Sanders J. E., Neudorf S., Cassileth P. A., Appelbaum F. R., Wiernik P. H., Burnett A. K.
Extract |
Full Text
N Engl J Med 1999;
340:1436-1439, May 6, 1999.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Gorin, N.-C., Labopin, M., Frassoni, F., Milpied, N., Attal, M., Blaise, D., Meloni, G., Iori, A. P., Michallet, M., Willemze, R., Deconninck, E., Harousseau, J.-L., Polge, E., Rocha, V.
(2008). Identical Outcome After Autologous or Allogeneic Genoidentical Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in First Remission of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia Carrying Inversion 16 or t(8;21): A Retrospective Study From the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. JCO
26: 3183-3188
[Abstract][Full Text]
Valcarcel, D., Martino, R., Caballero, D., Martin, J., Ferra, C., Nieto, J. B., Sampol, A., Bernal, M. T., Pinana, J. L., Vazquez, L., Ribera, J. M., Besalduch, J., Moraleda, J. M., Carrera, D., Brunet, M. S., Perez-Simon, J. A., Sierra, J.
(2008). Sustained Remissions of High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation: Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Is the Strongest Factor Improving Survival. JCO
26: 577-584
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schmid, C., Labopin, M., Nagler, A., Bornhauser, M., Finke, J., Fassas, A., Volin, L., Gurman, G., Maertens, J., Bordigoni, P., Holler, E., Ehninger, G., Polge, E., Gorin, N.-C., Kolb, H.-J., Rocha, V.
(2007). Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in the Treatment of First Hematological Relapse After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Risk Factors Analysis and Comparison With Other Strategies by the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party. JCO
25: 4938-4945
[Abstract][Full Text]
Devetten, M, Armitage, J.
(2007). Hematopoietic cell transplantation: progress and obstacles. Ann Oncol
18: 1450-1456
[Abstract][Full Text]
Estey, E.
(2007). Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Older Patients. JCO
25: 1908-1915
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cornelissen, J. J., van Putten, W. L. J., Verdonck, L. F., Theobald, M., Jacky, E., Daenen, S. M. G., van Marwijk Kooy, M., Wijermans, P., Schouten, H., Huijgens, P. C., van der Lelie, H., Fey, M., Ferrant, A., Maertens, J., Gratwohl, A., Lowenberg, B.
(2007). Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: benefits for whom?. Blood
109: 3658-3666
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gojo, I., Jiemjit, A., Trepel, J. B., Sparreboom, A., Figg, W. D., Rollins, S., Tidwell, M. L., Greer, J., Chung, E. J., Lee, M.-J., Gore, S. D., Sausville, E. A., Zwiebel, J., Karp, J. E.
(2007). Phase 1 and pharmacologic study of MS-275, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in adults with refractory and relapsed acute leukemias. Blood
109: 2781-2790
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yu, Y-B, Gau, J-P, You, J-Y, Chern, H-H, Chau, W-K, Tzeng, C-H, Ho, C-H, Hsu, H-C
(2007). Cost-effectiveness of postremission intensive therapy in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Oncol
18: 529-534
[Abstract][Full Text]
Estey, E., de Lima, M., Tibes, R., Pierce, S., Kantarjian, H., Champlin, R., Giralt, S.
(2007). Prospective feasibility analysis of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Blood
109: 1395-1400
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lancet, J. E., Gojo, I., Gotlib, J., Feldman, E. J., Greer, J., Liesveld, J. L., Bruzek, L. M., Morris, L., Park, Y., Adjei, A. A., Kaufmann, S. H., Garrett-Mayer, E., Greenberg, P. L., Wright, J. J., Karp, J. E.
(2007). A phase 2 study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in poor-risk and elderly patients with previously untreated acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood
109: 1387-1394
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jeha, S., Giles, F. J.
(2007). Acute myeloid leukemia. ASH-SAP
2007: 243-252
[Full Text]
Wilson, C. S., Davidson, G. S., Martin, S. B., Andries, E., Potter, J., Harvey, R., Ar, K., Xu, Y., Kopecky, K. J., Ankerst, D. P., Gundacker, H., Slovak, M. L., Mosquera-Caro, M., Chen, I-M., Stirewalt, D. L., Murphy, M., Schultz, F. A., Kang, H., Wang, X., Radich, J. P., Appelbaum, F. R., Atlas, S. R., Godwin, J., Willman, C. L.
(2006). Gene expression profiling of adult acute myeloid leukemia identifies novel biologic clusters for risk classification and outcome prediction. Blood
108: 685-696
[Abstract][Full Text]
Milligan, D. W., Wheatley, K., Littlewood, T., Craig, J. I. O., Burnett, A. K., for the NCRI Haematological Oncology Clinical Stud,
(2006). Fludarabine and cytosine are less effective than standard ADE chemotherapy in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia, and addition of G-CSF and ATRA are not beneficial: results of the MRC AML-HR randomized trial. Blood
107: 4614-4622
[Abstract][Full Text]
Buchner, T., Berdel, W. E., Schoch, C., Haferlach, T., Serve, H. L., Kienast, J., Schnittger, S., Kern, W., Tchinda, J., Reichle, A., Lengfelder, E., Staib, P., Ludwig, W.-D., Aul, C., Eimermacher, H., Balleisen, L., Sauerland, M.-C., Heinecke, A., Wormann, B., Hiddemann, W.
(2006). Double Induction Containing Either Two Courses or One Course of High-Dose Cytarabine Plus Mitoxantrone and Postremission Therapy by Either Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation or by Prolonged Maintenance for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. JCO
24: 2480-2489
[Abstract][Full Text]
Savoie, M. L., Nevil, T. J., Song, K. W., Forrest, D. L., Hogge, D. E., Nantel, S. H., Shepherd, J. D., Smith, C. A., Sutherland, H. J., Toze, C. L., Lavoie, J. C.
(2006). Shifting to outpatient management of acute myeloid leukemia: a prospective experience. Ann Oncol
17: 763-768
[Abstract][Full Text]
Appelbaum, F. R., Gundacker, H., Head, D. R., Slovak, M. L., Willman, C. L., Godwin, J. E., Anderson, J. E., Petersdorf, S. H.
(2006). Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood
107: 3481-3485
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pagel, J. M., Appelbaum, F. R., Eary, J. F., Rajendran, J., Fisher, D. R., Gooley, T., Ruffner, K., Nemecek, E., Sickle, E., Durack, L., Carreras, J., Horowitz, M. M., Press, O. W., Gopal, A. K., Martin, P. J., Bernstein, I. D., Matthews, D. C.
(2006). 131I-anti-CD45 antibody plus busulfan and cyclophosphamide before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. Blood
107: 2184-2191
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gale, R. E., Hills, R., Kottaridis, P. D., Srirangan, S., Wheatley, K., Burnett, A. K., Linch, D. C.
(2005). No evidence that FLT3 status should be considered as an indicator for transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): an analysis of 1135 patients, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia, from the UK MRC AML10 and 12 trials. Blood
106: 3658-3665
[Abstract][Full Text]
Stelljes, M., Bornhauser, M., Kroger, M., Beyer, J., Sauerland, M. C., Heinecke, A., Berning, B., Scheffold, C., Silling, G., Buchner, T., Neubauer, A., Fauser, A. A., Ehninger, G., Berdel, W. E., Kienast, J., for the Cooperative German Transplant Study Group,
(2005). Conditioning with 8-Gy total body irradiation and fludarabine for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood
106: 3314-3321
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jourdan, E., Boiron, J.-M., Dastugue, N., Vey, N., Marit, G., Rigal-Huguet, F., Molina, L., Fegueux, N., Pigneux, A., Recher, C., Rossi, J.-F., Attal, M., Sotto, J.-J., Maraninchi, D., Reiffers, J., Bardou, V.-J., Esterni, B., Blaise, D.
(2005). Early Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Young Adults With Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission: An Intent-to-Treat Long-Term Analysis of the BGMT Experience. JCO
23: 7676-7684
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schmid, C., Schleuning, M., Ledderose, G., Tischer, J., Kolb, H.-J.
(2005). Sequential Regimen of Chemotherapy, Reduced-Intensity Conditioning for Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation, and Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Transfusion in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome. JCO
23: 5675-5687
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tallman, M. S., Gilliland, D. G., Rowe, J. M.
(2005). Drug therapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood
106: 1154-1163
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ganti, A. K., Bierman, P. J., Lynch, J. C., Bociek, R. G., Vose, J. M., Armitage, J. O.
(2005). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol
16: 618-624
[Abstract][Full Text]
Darmon, M., Azoulay, E.
(2005). Prognosis of Acute Monocytic Leukemia (French-American-British Classification M5). JCO
23: 1327-1327
[Full Text]
Farag, S. S., Ruppert, A. S., Mrozek, K., Mayer, R. J., Stone, R. M., Carroll, A. J., Powell, B. L., Moore, J. O., Pettenati, M. J., Koduru, P. R.K., Stamberg, J., Baer, M. R., Block, A. W., Vardiman, J. W., Kolitz, J. E., Schiffer, C. A., Larson, R. A., Bloomfield, C. D.
(2005). Outcome of Induction and Postremission Therapy in Younger Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Normal Karyotype: A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. JCO
23: 482-493
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bradstock, K. F., Matthews, J. P., Lowenthal, R. M., Baxter, H., Catalano, J., Brighton, T., Gill, D., Eliadis, P., Joshua, D., Cannell, P., Schwarer, A. P., Durrant, S., Gillett, A., Koutts, J., Taylor, K., Bashford, J., Arthur, C., Enno, A., Dunlop, L., Szer, J., Leahy, M., Juneja, S., Young, G. A. R., for the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group,
(2005). A randomized trial of high-versus conventional-dose cytarabine in consolidation chemotherapy for adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia in first remission after induction therapy containing high-dose cytarabine. Blood
105: 481-488
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cornelissen, J. J., Lowenberg, B.
(2005). Role of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Current Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. ASH Education Book
2005: 151-155
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yee, K. W. H., Schittenhelm, M., O'Farrell, A.-M., Town, A. R., McGreevey, L., Bainbridge, T., Cherrington, J. M., Heinrich, M. C.
(2004). Synergistic effect of SU11248 with cytarabine or daunorubicin on FLT3 ITD-positive leukemic cells. Blood
104: 4202-4209
[Abstract][Full Text]
Levi, I., Grotto, I., Yerushalmi, R., Ben-Bassat, I., Shpilberg, O.
(2004). Re: Consolidation Therapy With Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-analysis. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
96: 1038-1039
[Full Text]
Matte, C. C., Cormier, J., Anderson, B. E., Athanasiadis, I., Liu, J., Emerson, S. G., Pear, W., Shlomchik, W. D.
(2004). Graft-versus-leukemia in a retrovirally induced murine CML model: mechanisms of T-cell killing. Blood
103: 4353-4361
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tallman, M. S., Kim, H. T., Paietta, E., Bennett, J. M., Dewald, G., Cassileth, P. A., Wiernik, P. H., Rowe, J. M.
(2004). Acute Monocytic Leukemia (French-American-British classification M5) Does Not Have a Worse Prognosis Than Other Subtypes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report From the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. JCO
22: 1276-1286
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wheatley, K., Gray, R.
(2004). Commentary: Mendelian randomization--an update on its use to evaluate allogeneic stem cell transplantation in leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol
33: 15-17
[Full Text]
Nathan, P. C., Sung, L., Crump, M., Beyene, J.
(2004). Consolidation Therapy With Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-analysis. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
96: 38-45
[Abstract][Full Text]
Stone, R. M., O'Donnell, M. R., Sekeres, M. A.
(2004). Acute Myeloid Leukemia. ASH Education Book
2004: 98-117
[Abstract][Full Text]
Buchner, T., Hiddemann, W., Berdel, W. E., Wormann, B., Schoch, C., Fonatsch, C., Loffler, H., Haferlach, T., Ludwig, W.-D., Maschmeyer, G., Staib, P., Aul, C., Gruneisen, A., Lengfelder, E., Frickhofen, N., Kern, W., Serve, H. L., Mesters, R. M., Sauerland, M. C., Heinecke, A.
(2003). 6-Thioguanine, Cytarabine, and Daunorubicin (TAD) and High-Dose Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone (HAM) for Induction, TAD for Consolidation, and Either Prolonged Maintenance by Reduced Monthly TAD or TAD-HAM-TAD and One Course of Intensive Consolidation by Sequential HAM in Adult Patients at All Ages With De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A Randomized Trial of the German AML Cooperative Group. JCO
21: 4496-4504
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kell, W. J., Burnett, A. K., Chopra, R., Yin, J. A. L., Clark, R. E., Rohatiner, A., Culligan, D., Hunter, A., Prentice, A. G., Milligan, D. W.
(2003). A feasibility study of simultaneous administration of gemtuzumab ozogamicin with intensive chemotherapy in induction and consolidation in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood
102: 4277-4283
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tur, M. K., Huhn, M., Thepen, T., Stocker, M., Krohn, R., Vogel, S., Jost, E., Osieka, R., van de Winkel, J. G., Fischer, R., Finnern, R., Barth, S.
(2003). Recombinant CD64-Specific Single Chain Immunotoxin Exhibits Specific Cytotoxicity against Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells. Cancer Res.
63: 8414-8419
[Abstract][Full Text]
Suciu, S., Mandelli, F., de Witte, T., Zittoun, R., Gallo, E., Labar, B., De Rosa, G., Belhabri, A., Giustolisi, R., Delarue, R., Liso, V., Mirto, S., Leone, G., Bourhis, J.-H., Fioritoni, G., Jehn, U., Amadori, S., Fazi, P., Hagemeijer, A., Willemze, R.
(2003). Allogeneic compared with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of patients younger than 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1): an intention-to-treat analysis of the EORTC/GIMEMAAML-10 trial. Blood
102: 1232-1240
[Abstract][Full Text]
Levine, J. E., Harris, R. E., Loberiza, F. R. Jr, Armitage, J. O., Vose, J. M., Van Besien, K., Lazarus, H. M., Horowitz, M. M.
(2003). A comparison of allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation for lymphoblastic lymphoma. Blood
101: 2476-2482
[Abstract][Full Text]
Locatelli, F., Labopin, M., Ortega, J., Meloni, G., Dini, G., Messina, C., Yaniv, I., Fagioli, F., Castel, V., Shaw, P. J., Ferrant, A., Pession, A., Socie, G., Frassoni, F.
(2003). Factors influencing outcome and incidence of long-term complications in children who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. Blood
101: 1611-1619
[Abstract][Full Text]
Karp, J. E., Ross, D. D., Yang, W., Tidwell, M. L., Wei, Y., Greer, J., Mann, D. L., Nakanishi, T., Wright, J. J., Colevas, A. D.
(2003). Timed Sequential Therapy of Acute Leukemia with Flavopiridol: In Vitro Model for a Phase I Clinical Trial. Clin. Cancer Res.
9: 307-315
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lowenberg, B., Griffin, J. D., Tallman, M. S.
(2003). Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. ASH Education Book
2003: 82-101
[Abstract][Full Text]
Anderson, J. E., Kopecky, K. J., Willman, C. L., Head, D., O'Donnell, M. R., Luthardt, F. W., Norwood, T. H., Chen, I-M., Balcerzak, S. P., Johnson, D. B., Appelbaum, F. R.
(2002). Outcome after induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia is not improved with mitoxantrone and etoposide compared to cytarabine and daunorubicin: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood
100: 3869-3876
[Abstract][Full Text]
Stone, R. M.
(2002). The Difficult Problem of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Older Adult. CA Cancer J Clin
52: 363-371
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rocha, V., Labopin, M., Gluckman, E., Powles, R., Arcese, W., Bacigalupo, A., Reiffers, J., Iriondo, A., Ringden, O., Ruutu, T., Frassoni, F.
(2002). Relevance of Bone Marrow Cell Dose on Allogeneic Transplantation Outcomes for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission: Results of a European Survey. JCO
20: 4324-4330
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fouillard, L., Labopin, M., Gorin, N.-C., Polge, E., Prentice, H. G., Meloni, G., Reiffers, J., Pigneux, A., Willemze, R., Schattenberg, A., Sica, S., Lagrange, M., Fenneteau, O., Perot, C., Frassoni, F.
(2002). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for de novo erythroleukemia: a study of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Blood
100: 3135-3140
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wolman, S. R., Gundacker, H., Appelbaum, F. R., Slovak, M. L.
(2002). Impact of trisomy 8 (+8) on clinical presentation, treatment response, and survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood
100: 29-35
[Abstract][Full Text]
van der Kolk, D. M., Vellenga, E., Scheffer, G. L., Muller, M., Bates, S. E., Scheper, R. J., de Vries, E. G. E.
(2002). Expression and activity of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in de novo and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood
99: 3763-3770
[Abstract][Full Text]
Giles, F. J., Keating, A., Goldstone, A. H., Avivi, I., Willman, C. L., Kantarjian, H. M.
(2002). Acute Myeloid Leukemia. ASH Education Book
2002: 73-110
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kawasaki, H., Isoyama, K., Eguchi, M., Hibi, S., Kinukawa, N., Kosaka, Y., Oda, T., Oda, M., Nishimura, S.-i., Imaizumi, M., Okamura, T., Hongo, T., Okawa, H., Mizutani, S., Hayashi, Y., Tsukimoto, I., Kamada, N., Ishii, E.
(2001). Superior outcome of infant acute myeloid leukemia with intensive chemotherapy: results of the Japan Infant Leukemia Study Group. Blood
98: 3589-3594
[Abstract][Full Text]
Karp, J. E., Lancet, J. E., Kaufmann, S. H., End, D. W., Wright, J. J., Bol, K., Horak, I., Tidwell, M. L., Liesveld, J., Kottke, T. J., Ange, D., Buddharaju, L., Gojo, I., Highsmith, W. E., Belly, R. T., Hohl, R. J., Rybak, M. E., Thibault, A., Rosenblatt, J.
(2001). Clinical and biologic activity of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 in adults with refractory and relapsed acute leukemias: a phase 1 clinical-laboratory correlative trial. Blood
97: 3361-3369
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cutler, C., Antin, J. H.
(2001). Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Allogeneic Transplantation: A Review. Stem Cells
19: 108-117
[Abstract][Full Text]
Appelbaum, F. R., Rowe, J. M., Radich, J., Dick, J. E.
(2001). Acute Myeloid Leukemia. ASH Education Book
2001: 62-86
[Abstract][Full Text]
Woods, W. G., Neudorf, S., Gold, S., Sanders, J., Buckley, J. D., Barnard, D. R., Dusenbery, K., DeSwarte, J., Arthur, D. C., Lange, B. J., Kobrinsky, N. L.
(2001). A comparison of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and aggressive chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia in remission: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Blood
97: 56-62
[Abstract][Full Text]
Slovak, M. L., Kopecky, K. J., Cassileth, P. A., Harrington, D. H., Theil, K. S., Mohamed, A., Paietta, E., Willman, C. L., Head, D. R., Rowe, J. M., Forman, S. J., Appelbaum, F. R.
(2000). Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Blood
96: 4075-4083
[Abstract][Full Text]
Su, W.-C., Chang, S.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Chen, J.-S., Tsao, C.-J.
(2000). Comparison of In Vitro Growth-inhibitory Activity of Carboplatin and Cisplatin on Leukemic Cells and Hematopoietic Progenitors: the Myelosuppressive Activity of Carboplatin May Be Greater Than Its Antileukemic Effect. Jpn J Clin Oncol
30: 562-567
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tallman, M. S., Neuberg, D., Bennett, J. M., Francois, C. J., Paietta, E., Wiernik, P. H., Dewald, G., Cassileth, P. A., Oken, M. M., Rowe, J. M.
(2000). Acute megakaryocytic leukemia: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Blood
96: 2405-2411
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bruserud, O., Tjønnfjord, G., Gjertsen, B. T., Foss, B., Ernst, P.
(2000). New Strategies in the Treatment of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: Mobilization and Transplantation of Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Adult Patients. Stem Cells
18: 343-351
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tallman, M. S., Rowlings, P. A., Milone, G., Zhang, M.-J., Perez, W. S., Weisdorf, D., Keating, A., Gale, R. P., Geller, R. B., Laughlin, M. J., Lazarus, H. M., Luger, S. M., McCarthy, P. L., Rowe, J. M., Saez, R. A., Vowels, M. R., Horowitz, M. M.
(2000). Effect of postremission chemotherapy before human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia in first complete remission. Blood
96: 1254-1258
[Abstract][Full Text]
Baynes, R. D., Hamm, C., Dansey, R., Klein, J., Cassells, L., Karanes, C., Abella, E., Peters, W. P.
(2000). Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Focus on Autografting. Clin. Chem.
46: 1239-1251
[Abstract][Full Text]
Stadtmauer, E. A., O'Neill, A., Goldstein, L. J., Crilley, P. A., Mangan, K. F., Ingle, J. N., Brodsky, I., Martino, S., Lazarus, H. M., Erban, J. K., Sickles, C., Glick, J. H., The Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group,
(2000). Conventional-Dose Chemotherapy Compared with High-Dose Chemotherapy plus Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Metastatic Breast Cancer. NEJM
342: 1069-1076
[Abstract][Full Text]
Harousseau, J. L., Witz, B., Lioure, B., Hunault-Berger, M., Desablens, B., Delain, M., Guilhot, F., Le Prise, P. Y., Abgrall, J. F., Deconinck, E., Guyotat, D., Vilque, J. P., Casassus, P., Tournilhac, O., Audhuy, B., Solary, E.
(2000). Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor After Intensive Consolidation Chemotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Randomized Trial of the Groupe Ouest-Est Leucemies Aigues Myeloblastiques. JCO
18: 780-780
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lowenberg, B., Downing, J. R., Burnett, A.
(1999). Acute Myeloid Leukemia. NEJM
341: 1051-1062
[Full Text]
Verdonck, L. F., Shipp, M. A.
(1999). High-Dose Therapy With Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. JCO
17: 3002-3002
[Full Text]
Buchner, T., Hiddemann, W., Wormann, B., Loffler, H., Gassmann, W., Haferlach, T., Fonatsch, C., Haase, D., Schoch, C., Hossfeld, D., Lengfelder, E., Aul, C., Heyll, A., Maschmeyer, G., Ludwig, W.-D., Sauerland, M.-C., Heinecke, A.
(1999). Double Induction Strategy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Effect of High-Dose Cytarabine With Mitoxantrone Instead of Standard-Dose Cytarabine With Daunorubicin and 6-Thioguanine: A Randomized Trial by the German AML Cooperative Group. Blood
93: 4116-4124
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kanda, Y., Miwa, A., Togawa, A., Perez-Calvo, J., Brugarolas, A., Suzuki, R., Seto, M., Morishima, Y., Gorin, N.-C., Labopin, M., Woods, W. G., Sanders, J. E., Neudorf, S., Cassileth, P. A., Appelbaum, F. R., Wiernik, P. H., Burnett, A. K.
(1999). Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. NEJM
340: 1436-1439
[Full Text]
Aversa, F., Terenzi, A., Carotti, A., Felicini, R., Jacucci, R., Zei, T., Latini, P., Aristei, C., Santucci, A., Martelli, M. P., Cunningham, I., Reisner, Y., Martelli, M. F.
(1999). Improved Outcome With T-Cell–Depleted Bone Marrow Transplantation for Acute Leukemia. JCO
17: 1545-1545
[Abstract][Full Text]
(1998). Postinduction Chemotherapy vs. Bone Marrow Transplantation in AML. JWatch General
1998: 3-3
[Full Text]
Burnett, A. K.
(1998). Transplantation in First Remission of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. NEJM
339: 1698-1700
[Full Text]