The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 340:260-264 January 28, 1999 Number 4
NextNext

Prevalence of Various Respiratory Viruses in the Middle Ear during Acute Otitis Media
Terho Heikkinen, M.D., Monica Thint, M.D., and Tasnee Chonmaitree, M.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Eskola, J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Vaccines against respiratory viruses may be able to reduce the frequency of acute otitis media. Although the role of respiratory viruses in the pathogenesis of acute otitis media is well established, the relative importance of various viruses is unknown.

Methods We determined the prevalence of various respiratory viruses in the middle-ear fluid in 456 children (age, two months to seven years) with acute otitis media. At enrollment and after two to five days of antibiotic therapy, specimens of middle-ear fluid and nasal-wash specimens were obtained for viral and bacterial cultures and the detection of viral antigens. The viral cause of the infections was also assessed by serologic studies of serum samples obtained during the acute illness and convalescence.

Results A specific viral cause of the respiratory tract infections was identified in 186 of the 456 children (41 percent). Respiratory syncytial virus was the most common virus identified in middle-ear fluid: it was detected in the middle-ear fluid of 48 of the 65 children (74 percent) infected by this virus (P<=0.04 for the comparison with any other virus). Parainfluenza viruses (15 of 29 children [52 percent]) and influenzaviruses (10 of 24 children [42 percent]) were detected in the middle-ear fluid significantly more often than enteroviruses (3 of 27 children [11 percent]) or adenoviruses (1 of 23 children [4 percent]) (P<=0.01 for all comparisons).

Conclusions Respiratory syncytial virus is the principal virus invading the middle ear during acute otitis media. An effective vaccine against upper respiratory tract infections caused by respiratory syncytial virus may reduce the incidence of acute otitis media in children.


Acute otitis media is the most common bacterial infection among children and the most frequent reason for outpatient antibiotic therapy.1 Despite proper antibiotic treatment, middle-ear effusion may persist for weeks or months,2,3 often resulting in repeated courses of antibiotics and, eventually, surgical intervention.4 In the United States, the annual costs of otitis media have been estimated to exceed $3.5 billion.5 Although acute otitis media is generally considered a bacterial infection, there is ample evidence that respiratory viruses have a crucial role in the etiology and pathogenesis of this disease.6,7 Moreover, viruses may also profoundly affect the outcome of acute otitis media.7,8,9,10 A better understanding of the effect of viruses and the mechanisms of interactions between viruses and bacteria in otitis media is essential if major improvements are to be made in the management and prevention of this disease.

Several studies have documented the presence of viruses in the middle-ear fluid of children with acute otitis media,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 but it is not known whether there are differences in the ability of various respiratory viruses to invade the middle ear. Knowledge of the relative frequencies of viral involvement in the middle ear would be important for the development of effective strategies to prevent otitis media. Vaccination against influenzavirus decreases the incidence of acute otitis media in infants and children,17,18,19 and vaccines against other respiratory viruses, particularly respiratory syncytial virus, are being developed.20,21,22,23 Vaccines against the viruses that are found most frequently in the middle ear will probably have the greatest potential for reducing the incidence of acute otitis media. We sought to determine the rates of middle-ear invasion by common respiratory viruses in children with acute otitis media and a concurrent, documented viral infection of the upper respiratory tract.

Methods

Study Subjects

We studied 456 children (age, two months to seven years) with acute otitis media who were enrolled in various antibiotic trials between 1989 and 1993.10,16 All the children were otherwise generally healthy and were seen at our primary care clinics. None of the children had received antibiotics during the week preceding the study. The diagnosis of acute otitis media was based on symptoms of fever, irritability, or earache; signs of inflammation of the tympanic membrane (red or yellow color or bulging of the membrane); and the presence of fluid in the middle ear on tympanocentesis. Informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of all the children, and all procedures conformed to the guidelines established by the Department of Health and Human Services and the institutional review board of the University of Texas Medical Branch.

Specimens

At enrollment (visit 1), middle-ear fluid was obtained for bacterial and viral studies by needle tympanocentesis. After tympanocentesis, a nasal-wash specimen was collected for viral studies by flushing the nostril with 3 to 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline solution in a 30-ml tapered rubber bulb.24 Venous blood was also obtained for serologic studies during the acute illness.

Follow-up visits were scheduled two to five days after the initiation of therapy (visit 2), at the end of therapy (visit 3; days 9 to 12), and approximately one month after the initiation of therapy (visit 4). During the second visit, a second tympanocentesis was routinely performed and a second nasal-wash specimen was collected for viral studies. Venous blood was obtained during the third visit to assess antibody responses to viruses during convalescence.

Processing of Specimens and Virologic Procedures

Immediately after collection, portions of the specimens of middle-ear fluid were inoculated onto blood-agar, chocolate-agar, and MacConkey-agar plates and into meat broth to test for aerobic bacteria. The remaining middle-ear fluid was diluted with 1.0 to 1.2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline solution and inoculated into cell cultures within two to three hours after collection. For viral culture of middle-ear fluid and nasal-wash specimens, each specimen was inoculated in two tubes each of primary monkey-kidney cells and human fibroblasts (MRC-5 cells). In addition, Hep-2 cells and Buffalo green-monkey–kidney cells were used during respiratory syncytial virus and enterovirus seasons, respectively. For each cell line, one tube was incubated at 33°C and the other at 36°C, and they were observed daily for 10 days for cytopathic effects. Hemadsorption was performed three times, and the final identification of viruses was made according to standard methods.

Rapid viral antigen testing was performed on specimens of middle-ear fluid and nasal-wash specimens. For middle-ear fluid, the presence of respiratory syncytial virus antigens was assessed by enzyme immunoassay (Respiratory Syncytial Virus Enzyme Immunoassay Diagnostic Kit, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill., or Ortho Respiratory Syncytial Virus Antigen Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay Test, Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Raritan, N.J.). For nasal-wash specimens, the cell pellet from the centrifuged specimen was smeared onto microscope slides and subjected to an indirect fluorescence antibody assay with commercially available antiserum for respiratory syncytial virus, influenza A and B viruses, adenoviruses, and parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3 (Bartels Viral Respiratory Panel, Baxter Healthcare, West Sacramento, Calif.). Serologic tests for the same respiratory viruses were also performed by the same indirect fluorescence antibody technique. Serum samples obtained from a patient during the acute illness and convalescence were tested at the same time.

Definitions

The presence of a viral infection of the respiratory tract was considered to be confirmed if the results of viral culture or antigen-detection tests of either nasal-wash or middle-ear specimens obtained during the first or second visit were positive. An increase in viral titers by a factor of at least 4 from the time of acute illness to convalescence was also considered proof of a viral infection.

When we calculated the prevalence of the various viruses in the specimens of middle-ear fluid, we regarded the dual viral infections in nine children as separate infections. In 25 children with evidence of a viral infection on analysis of the middle-ear fluid, the specimens from the left and right ears had been combined before viral culture or antigen detection, and they were therefore excluded from the analysis of specific combinations of viruses and bacteria in the middle ear.

Statistical Analysis

Comparison of proportions between the groups was done by the standard chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance according to rank were used to compare nonparametric continuous data between the groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Of the 456 children analyzed, the specific viral cause of the respiratory tract infections was determined in 186 (41 percent); these children had a total of 208 viral infections (18 children each were infected by two viruses, and 2 children each by three viruses). Of these 208 infections, 168 (81 percent) were caused by respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus type 1, 2, or 3, influenza A or B virus, enteroviruses, or adenoviruses (Table 1). There were no significant differences in sex, race or ethnic group, duration of respiratory symptoms, or age among the groups with specific viral illnesses or between these children and the group of children as a whole, except that children with influenzavirus infection were significantly older than the other children.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the Group of Children as a Whole and According to the Specific Viral Infections.

 
Respiratory syncytial virus was the most common virus identified in middle-ear fluid: the virus was detected in the middle-ear fluid of 74 percent of the children infected by this virus (P=0.04 for the comparison with parainfluenza viruses and P<=0.005 for the comparison with any of the other viral groups) (Table 2). Also, parainfluenza viruses (52 percent) or influenzaviruses (42 percent) were found in the middle-ear fluid significantly more often than enteroviruses (11 percent) or adenoviruses (4 percent) (P<=0.01 for all comparisons). The relative differences in the prevalences remained regardless of whether the rates were calculated per patient or per infected ear. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race or ethnic group, or duration of respiratory symptoms between the children with viruses in middle-ear fluid and those without viruses.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Prevalence of Various Respiratory Viruses in the Middle Ear in Children with Acute Otitis Media.

 
The 456 children had a total of 815 ears with acute otitis media. Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from the middle-ear fluid of 203 of these ears (25 percent), Haemophilus influenzae from 190 ears (23 percent), and Moraxella catarrhalis from 122 ears (15 percent); 82 ears (10 percent) had either two or all three of these bacterial pathogens at the same time. Sixty-six ears from which viruses were detected in the middle-ear fluid could be analyzed for the presence of bacteria; both virus and bacteria were found in 43 of these ears (65 percent). In these combined viral and bacterial infections, S. pneumoniae was cultured significantly more often in middle-ear fluid containing influenzaviruses (100 percent) than in those containing respiratory syncytial virus (36 percent) or parainfluenza viruses (10 percent) (Table 3). No statistically significant differences were observed in the rates of detection of H. influenzae or M. catarrhalis in combination with any of these three viruses. Virus as the sole middle-ear pathogen (without bacteria) was found in 14 of 36 ears with respiratory syncytial virus (39 percent), 6 of 16 ears with parainfluenza viruses (38 percent), and 2 of 10 ears with influenzaviruses (20 percent) (no significant differences among the groups).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Specific Microorganisms in the 43 Samples of Middle-Ear Fluid That Contained Both Bacteria and Viruses.

 
Discussion

We used tympanocentesis together with comprehensive viral and bacterial diagnostic methods in 456 children with acute otitis media to determine and compare the relative frequencies of respiratory viruses in the middle-ear fluid. Our results suggest that the rates of middle-ear invasion by the common respiratory viruses vary significantly during acute otitis media and that respiratory syncytial virus has a particularly strong ability to invade the middle ear. Our results also provide additional evidence of the active role of viruses in the pathogenesis of acute otitis media. The different prevalences of the viruses suggest that some viruses enter the middle ear passively along with nasal secretions, whereas other viruses actively invade the middle ear and contribute to the inflammatory process in the middle-ear mucosa. If the viruses found in the middle-ear fluid were only innocent bystanders with no active role, they should be detected in the middle-ear fluid at roughly equal rates during different viral infections.

Previous studies have demonstrated a wide array of viruses in the middle-ear fluids of infants and children with acute otitis media.8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,25,26 However, none of these studies have been able to determine the relative importance of the various viruses to otitis media. Obviously, the likelihood of detecting particular viruses in the middle-ear fluid during acute otitis media is dependent on the overall prevalence of those infections in the study population; therefore, the rates of viral detection in middle-ear fluid in different studies are not directly comparable. Furthermore, differences in the methods of viral detection used in earlier studies limit the comparability of the frequencies. The strength of the present study is that we consistently used similar methods of viral detection in a large number of children over several respiratory virus seasons. It could be argued, however, that we might have overestimated the differences in the rates of detection in middle-ear fluid between respiratory syncytial virus and the other viruses because we used antigen detection only to identify respiratory syncytial virus and not the other viruses in middle-ear fluid. The use of antigen detection for respiratory syncytial virus was essential, because unlike other respiratory viruses, this virus is relatively labile, and thus, the sensitivity of cell-culture technique for this virus is considerably lower than those of various rapid antigen techniques.27 Although in theory the use of viral-antigen detection in nasopharyngeal specimens but not in middle-ear specimens could have resulted in falsely low rates of detection of influenzaviruses, parainfluenza viruses, and adenoviruses in the middle ear, this possibility did not affect our results or conclusions, because only one influenzavirus infection and two adenovirus infections were diagnosed solely on the basis of antigen detection in the nasopharyngeal specimens.

Our results are in accordance with those of previous epidemiologic studies of the association of viral infections with acute otitis media. Several reports have indicated that respiratory syncytial virus may be the type of virus that is most likely to predispose a child to acute otitis media.28,29,30,31 The relative ability of different respiratory viruses to predispose a person to acute otitis media is, however, difficult to determine, because the development of acute otitis media depends on multiple factors. In particular, the age of the child is an important confounding factor that has not been adjusted for in many studies. Nonetheless, our results clearly corroborate the view that respiratory syncytial virus is an important cause of acute otitis media in children. We could not determine the relative importance of rhinoviruses in acute otitis media, because the incidence of rhinovirus infections was too low for any meaningful analysis. Rhinoviruses account for approximately one third of all infections of the upper respiratory tract,32 and previous studies have demonstrated that rhinoviruses can also be found in middle-ear fluid in children with acute otitis media.14,15 A recent study, which used a reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction assay to detect respiratory viruses, suggested that the prevalence of rhinoviruses in middle-ear fluid during acute otitis media may be similar to that of respiratory syncytial virus.33 In general, the development of nucleic acid–based assays for a wide range of respiratory viruses may provide researchers with more sensitive methods for studying the role of respiratory viruses in acute otitis media.

The presence of viruses in the middle-ear fluid is important not only in regard to the etiology and pathogenesis of acute otitis media, but also in regard to the outcome of the disease.7 Clinical studies have indicated that the presence of viruses in the middle ear may considerably worsen both the clinical and bacteriologic outcomes of otitis media.8,9,10 The mechanisms by which viruses enhance or prolong the inflammation in the middle ear are still unclear, but studies have shown that there are higher concentrations of some inflammatory mediators in middle-ear fluid containing both bacteria and virus than in middle-ear fluid containing bacteria alone.16,34,35

The enormous impact of otitis media on society has made prevention of this disease a high priority of research, and bacterial and viral vaccines are considered to hold the greatest promise for the ultimate prevention of acute otitis media.36,37 Previous studies have clearly demonstrated that both inactivated and live, attenuated influenzavirus vaccines reduce the incidence of acute otitis media in infants and children.17,18,19 Our results suggest that an effective vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus might have a major effect on the incidence of acute otitis media, together with the more serious manifestations of respiratory syncytial virus infection. It is apparent, however, that to prevent acute otitis media, such a vaccine should protect not only the lower respiratory tract but also the upper respiratory tract.

Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 DC 02620), the Academy of Finland, and the Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation. Dr. Heikkinen is the recipient of a European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases Fellowship Award sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

We are indebted to Drs. Virgil M. Howie and Mary J. Owen for their contributions to the clinical part of the study.


Source Information

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0371, where reprint requests should be addressed to Dr. Chonmaitree (e-mail address: tchonmai{at}utmb.edu).

References

  1. McCaig LF, Hughes JM. Trends in antimicrobial drug prescribing among office-based physicians in the United States. JAMA 1995;273:214-219. [Erratum, JAMA 1998;279:434.] [Free Full Text]
  2. Shurin PA, Pelton SI, Donner A, Klein JO. Persistence of middle-ear effusion after acute otitis media in children. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1121-1123. [Abstract]
  3. Mandel EM, Bluestone CD, Rockette HE, et al. Duration of effusion after antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media: comparison of cefaclor and amoxicillin. Pediatr Infect Dis 1982;1:310-316. [Medline]
  4. Berman S. Otitis media in children. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1560-1565. [Free Full Text]
  5. Stool SE, Field MJ. The impact of otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1989;8:Suppl:S11-S14. [Medline]
  6. Ruuskanen O, Arola M, Heikkinen T, Ziegler T. Viruses in acute otitis media: increasing evidence for clinical significance. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:425-427. [Medline]
  7. Chonmaitree T, Heikkinen T. Role of viruses in middle-ear disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997;830:143-157. [Medline]
  8. Chonmaitree T, Owen MJ, Howie VM. Respiratory viruses interfere with bacteriologic response to antibiotic in children with acute otitis media. J Infect Dis 1990;162:546-549. [Medline]
  9. Arola M, Ziegler T, Ruuskanen O. Respiratory virus infection as a cause of prolonged symptoms in acute otitis media. J Pediatr 1990;116:697-701. [CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Chonmaitree T, Owen MJ, Patel JA, Hedgpeth D, Horlick D, Howie VM. Effect of viral respiratory tract infection on outcome of acute otitis media. J Pediatr 1992;120:856-862. [CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Klein BS, Dollete FR, Yolken RH. The role of respiratory syncytial virus and other viral pathogens in acute otitis media. J Pediatr 1982;101:16-20. [CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Sarkkinen HK, Meurman O, Salmi TT, Puhakka H, Virolainen E. Demonstration of viral antigens in middle ear secretions of children with acute otitis media. Acta Paediatr Scand 1983;72:137-138. [Medline]
  13. Sarkkinen H, Ruuskanen O, Meurman O, Puhakka H, Virolainen E, Eskola J. Identification of respiratory virus antigens in middle ear fluids of children with acute otitis media. J Infect Dis 1985;151:444-448. [Medline]
  14. Chonmaitree T, Howie VM, Truant AL. Presence of respiratory viruses in middle ear fluids and nasal wash specimens from children with acute otitis media. Pediatrics 1986;77:698-702. [Free Full Text]
  15. Arola M, Ziegler T, Ruuskanen O, Mertsola J, Näntö-Salonen K, Halonen P. Rhinovirus in acute otitis media. J Pediatr 1988;113:693-695. [CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Chonmaitree T, Patel JA, Garofalo R, et al. Role of leukotriene B4 and interleukin-8 in acute bacterial and viral otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:968-974. [Medline]
  17. Heikkinen T, Ruuskanen O, Waris M, Ziegler T, Arola M, Halonen P. Influenza vaccination in the prevention of acute otitis media in children. Am J Dis Child 1991;145:445-448. [Free Full Text]
  18. Clements DA, Langdon L, Bland C, Walter E. Influenza A vaccine decreases the incidence of otitis media in 6- to 30-month-old children in day care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:1113-1117. [Free Full Text]
  19. Belshe RB, Mendelman PM, Treanor J, et al. The efficacy of live attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intranasal influenzavirus vaccine in children. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1405-1412. [Free Full Text]
  20. Crowe JE Jr. Current approaches to the development of vaccines against disease caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and parainfluenza virus (PIV): a meeting report of the WHO Programme for Vaccine Development. Vaccine 1995;13:415-421. [CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Karron RA, Wright PF, Crowe JE Jr, et al. Evaluation of two live, cold-passaged, temperature-sensitive respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in chimpanzees and in human adults, infants, and children. J Infect Dis 1997;176:1428-1436. [Medline]
  22. Groothuis JR, King SJ, Hogerman DA, Paradiso PR, Simoes EAF. Safety and immunogenicity of a purified F protein respiratory syncytial virus (PFP-2) vaccine in seropositive children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Infect Dis 1998;177:467-469. [Medline]
  23. Wright PF, Karron RA, Crowe JE Jr, et al. Evaluation of a live, attenuated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine candidate, cpts 248/404, in infancy. Pediatr Res 1998;43:161A-161A.abstract 
  24. Hall CB, Douglas RG Jr. Clinically useful method for the isolation of respiratory syncytial virus. J Infect Dis 1975;131:1-5. [Medline]
  25. Chonmaitree T, Owen MJ, Patel JA, Hedgpeth D, Horlick D, Howie VM. Presence of cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus in middle ear fluids from children with acute otitis media. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15:650-653. [Medline]
  26. Cone RW, Chonmaitree T, Huang M-LW, Howie VM, Owen MJ. Human herpesvirus 6 variant B in acute otitis media. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17:558-558.abstract 
  27. Hall CB, McCarthy CA. Respiratory syncytial virus. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995:1501-19.
  28. Henderson FW, Collier AM, Sanyal MA, et al. A longitudinal study of respiratory viruses and bacteria in the etiology of acute otitis media with effusion. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1377-1383. [Abstract]
  29. Ruuskanen O, Arola M, Putto-Laurila A, et al. Acute otitis media and respiratory virus infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1989;8:94-99. [Medline]
  30. Uhari M, Hietala J, Tuokko H. Risk of acute otitis media in relation to the viral etiology of infections in children. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:521-524. [Medline]
  31. Heikkinen T, Waris M, Ruuskanen O, Putto-Laurila A, Mertsola J. Incidence of acute otitis media associated with group A and B respiratory syncytial virus infections. Acta Paediatr 1995;84:419-423. [Medline]
  32. Gwaltney JM Jr. The common cold: In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995:561-6.
  33. Pitkäranta A, Virolainen A, Jero J, Arruda E, Hayden FG. Detection of rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and coronavirus infections in acute otitis media by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Pediatrics 1998;102:291-295. [Free Full Text]
  34. Chonmaitree T, Patel JA, Lett-Brown MA, et al. Virus and bacteria enhance histamine production in middle ear fluids of children with acute otitis media. J Infect Dis 1994;169:1265-1270. [Medline]
  35. Patel JA, Sim T, Owen MJ, Howie VM, Chonmaitree T. Influence of viral infection on middle ear chemokine response in acute otitis media. In: Lim DJ, Bluestone CD, Casselbrant M, Klein JO, Ogra PL, eds. Recent advances in otitis media. Hamilton, Ont.: B.C. Decker, 1996:178-9.
  36. Giebink GS. Preventing otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1994;163:20-23. [Medline]
  37. Heikkinen T, Ruuskanen O. New prospects in the prevention of otitis media. Ann Med 1996;28:23-30. [Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Eskola, J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Respiratory Viruses and Acute Otitis Media
Pitkäranta A., Hayden F. G., Damoiseaux R. A.M.J., van Balen F. A.M., Verheij T. J.M., Heikkinen T., Chonmaitree T., Thint M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 340:2001-2002, Jun 24, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.