The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correction to Knopp, N Engl J Med 341(7):498-511 August 12, 1999.

Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 341:2020-2021 December 23, 1999 Number 26
NextNext

Drug Treatment of Lipid Disorders

 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Knopp, R. H.
-Related Article
 by Knopp, R. H.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: In his review of drug treatment for lipid disorders (Aug. 12 issue),1 Dr. Knopp notes that dietary intervention is an important first step in the treatment of patients with hyperlipidemia. We would like to remind readers not to overlook the benefits of physical activity in such patients. In addition to raising serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations, physical activity facilitates weight loss and has also been reported to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases, an effect that is independent of its effects on serum lipid concentrations in both men and women. For these reasons, physical activity along with dietary modification is recommended as the first line of therapy in the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults.2


Joan Dorn, Ph.D.
John Naughton, M.D.
State University of New York at Buffalo
Buffalo, NY 14214-3000


Catarina Galletti, M.D.
University of Bologna
40059 Bologna, Italy

References

  1. Knopp RH. Drug treatment of lipid disorders. N Engl J Med 1999;341:498-511. [Free Full Text]
  2. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA 1993;269:3015-3023. [Free Full Text]

 
To the Editor: In his discussion of fibrates, Dr. Knopp does not mention that these drugs often cause an increase in both serum urea and creatinine concentrations. In a review of articles that contained data on renal function in a total of 2643 patients taking fibrates,1 an increase in mean serum creatinine concentrations during therapy was reported in all five articles on fenofibrate and in all seven on bezafibrate, with increases occurring in 8 percent to 18 percent of patients taking fenofibrate and in 9 percent to 40 percent of those taking bezafibrate; three of four articles on ciprofibrate also reported increased serum creatinine concentrations (range, 6 percent to 16 percent of patients). In all cases, renal function returned to normal after discontinuation of the fibrate. No renal impairment was described in any of the eight articles reporting data on patients taking gemfibrozil.

Although the mechanisms leading to the increased serum urea and creatinine concentrations are unknown, this side effect is important for two reasons. First, awareness of this change may prevent unnecessary studies in patients in whom it develops. Second, high serum concentrations of homocysteine, an important cardiovascular risk factor, have recently been reported in patients taking either fenofibrate or bezafibrate.2 This increase has been ascribed to a fibrate-induced impairment of renal function, and it may counteract the benefits expected from the lipid-lowering action of fenofibrate, bezafibrate, and ciprofibrate. This might explain why gemfibrozil, which is devoid of renal side effects, is the only fibrate that has resulted in a significant reduction of major cardiac events in both primary-prevention trials3 and secondary-prevention trials.4


Nilufer Broeders, M.D.
Christiane Knoop, M.D.
Daniel Abramowicz, M.D.
Hôpital Erasme
B-1070 Brussels, Belgium

References

  1. Broeders N, Knoop C, Antoine M, Abramowicz D. Fibrate-induced renal dysfunction: is gemfibrozil the only non-nephrotic agent? Transplantation 1999;67:Suppl:S170-S170.abstract 
  2. Dierkes J, Westphal S, Luley C. Serum homocysteine increases after therapy with fenofibrate or bezafibrate. Lancet 1999;354:219-220. [CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K, et al. Helsinki Heart Study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia: safety of treatment, changes in risk factors, and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1237-1245. [Abstract]
  4. Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, et al. Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. N Engl J Med 1999;341:410-418. [Free Full Text]

 
Dr. Knopp replies:

To the Editor: Dorn et al. make the worthy point that exercise is an important element in caring for patients with hyperlipidemia. However, substantial physical effort is required, such as five hours of aerobic exercise per week, to raise the serum HDL cholesterol concentration by 5 mg per deciliter (0.1 mmol per liter).1 Obese, inactive patients, in whom the beneficial effects of exercise on serum triglyceride and HDL concentrations would be the greatest, are least likely to engage in such activity. In general, my colleagues and I inquire about and encourage exercise. A specific recommendation of exercise can be beneficial when dietary and drug interventions have been maximally implemented and when the patient can clearly recognize the potential benefit of greater physical effort.

The mechanism and clinical importance of the increase in serum creatinine associated with the use of some fibric acid drugs are unclear. The effect appears to be entirely reversible. The studies in which increases in serum homocystine concentrations were reported in patients receiving fibric acid derivatives were not controlled.2,3 It is also unclear whether the reported increases in serum creatinine and homocystine concentrations are related.

There is an error in Table 2 of the article, on page 500, which lists risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In the right-hand column, the serum homocystine concentration should have been >10 µmol per liter, not >10 nmol per liter, as printed.


Robert H. Knopp, M.D.
Northwest Lipid Research Clinic
Seattle, WA 98104

References

  1. Thompson PD, Cullinane EM, Sady SP, et al. Modest changes in high-density lipoprotein concentration and metabolism with prolonged exercise training. Circulation 1988;78:25-34. [Free Full Text]
  2. de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Paillard F, Lacan P, Richard G. Lipid-lowering drugs and homocysteine. Lancet 1999;353:209-210. 
  3. Dierkes J, Westphal S, Luley C. Serum homocysteine increases after therapy with fenofibrate or bezafibrate. Lancet 1999;354:219-220.

 


 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Knopp, R. H.
-Related Article
 by Knopp, R. H.
-PubMed Citation


HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.