The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 342:301-307 February 3, 2000 Number 5
NextNext

A Novel Subtype of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Characterized by a Rapid Onset and an Absence of Diabetes-Related Antibodies
Akihisa Imagawa, M.D., Toshiaki Hanafusa, M.D., Ph.D., Jun-ichiro Miyagawa, M.D., Ph.D., Yuji Matsuzawa, M.D., Ph.D., for The Osaka IDDM Study Group

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Lernmark, A.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background and Methods Type 1 diabetes mellitus is now classified as autoimmune (type 1A) or idiopathic (type 1B), but little is known about the latter. We classified 56 consecutive Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes according to the presence or absence of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (their presence is a marker of autoimmunity) and compared their clinical, serologic, and pathological characteristics.

Results We divided the patients into three groups: 36 patients with positive tests for serum glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, 9 with negative tests for serum glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and glycosylated hemoglobin values higher than 11.5 percent, and 11 with negative tests for serum glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and glycosylated hemoglobin values lower than 8.5 percent. In comparison with the first two groups, the third group had a shorter mean duration of symptoms of hyperglycemia (4.0 days), a higher mean plasma glucose concentration (773 mg per deciliter [43 mmol per liter]) in spite of lower glycosylated hemoglobin values, diminished urinary excretion of C peptide, a more severe metabolic disorder (with ketoacidosis), higher serum pancreatic enzyme concentrations, and an absence of islet-cell, IA-2, and insulin antibodies. Immunohistologic studies of pancreatic-biopsy specimens from three patients with negative tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and low glycosylated hemoglobin values revealed T-lymphocyte–predominant infiltrates in the exocrine pancreas but no insulitis and no evidence of acute or chronic pancreatitis.

Conclusions Some patients with idiopathic type 1 diabetes have a nonautoimmune, fulminant disorder characterized by the absence of insulitis and of diabetes-related antibodies, a remarkably abrupt onset, and high serum pancreatic enzyme concentrations.


Type 1 diabetes mellitus is caused by loss of insulin-secreting capacity due to selective autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic beta cells.1,2 Insulitis (i.e., mononuclear-cell infiltration of the pancreatic islets) is the direct result of the autoimmune process. Antibodies to the cytoplasm of islet cells, glutamic acid decarboxylase, insulin, and tyrosine phosphatase–like protein (IA-2 or IA-2ß), which appear before the clinical onset of diabetes, are good markers of the autoimmune process.1,2

Several lines of evidence have suggested that autoimmunity is not the only cause of beta-cell destruction. We and others have described young patients who presented with the abrupt onset of symptoms of hyperglycemia and who were prone to the development of ketoacidosis, as is characteristic of patients with type 1 diabetes, but who did not have insulitis on either biopsy3,4,5 or autopsy.6,7 Furthermore, at least 10 percent of patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes do not have any diabetes-related antibodies.8,9

The American Diabetes Association and the World Health Organization have proposed that type 1 diabetes be subdivided into autoimmune (immune-mediated) diabetes (type 1A) and idiopathic diabetes with beta-cell destruction (type 1B).10,11 However, the specific characteristics of the idiopathic subtype are largely unknown. In a previous study,5 we found that the presence of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, but not islet-cell antibodies, was closely correlated with direct evidence of insulitis in patients with type 1 diabetes. In this report, we describe the results of detailed clinical and histologic studies of patients with idiopathic type 1 diabetes.

Methods

Patients

We studied 56 consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes who came to our hospitals within one year after receiving the diagnosis, during the period from 1994 to 1998. All 56 patients met the criteria of the American Diabetes Association for type 1 diabetes — that is, pancreatic beta-cell destruction as the primary cause of the disorder and a tendency toward ketoacidosis10,11 — as determined by at least two physicians independently. Patients who had a period of remission that lasted for six months or more after the diagnosis had been made were excluded.12 None of the enrolled patients consumed moderate or large amounts of alcohol. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Osaka University Medical Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Clinical Characteristics and Serum Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibodies

At the time of the onset of overt diabetes, all patients were hospitalized. Their clinical characteristics were recorded, and plasma glucose, serum electrolytes, arterial pH, glycosylated hemoglobin, and serum total or pancreatic amylase and elastase I were measured within two days after the initial diagnosis, and an ultrasonographic study of the pancreas was performed. Patients with arterial pH values lower than 7.35 and serum bicarbonate concentrations lower than 18 mmol per liter received the diagnosis of metabolic acidosis. Urinary C-peptide excretion was measured daily for at least three days, and the mean value was calculated. Subsequently, all patients underwent clinical examinations and measurements of glycosylated hemoglobin at monthly intervals.

The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in serum samples obtained within three months after the initial diagnosis of diabetes, with the use of a radioimmunoassay kit (Rip-GAD, Hoechst Japan, Tokyo, or GAD-Ab Cosmic, Cosmic, Tokyo). A value greater than 5 units per milliliter (with the first kit) or 1.5 units per milliliter (with the second) was considered positive. The specificity and sensitivity of the first kit were 100 percent and 89.5 percent in the Second International GADAb Workshop, respectively,13 and the specificity and sensitivity of the second kit were both 100 percent in the Second and Third GAD Proficiency Test Results Evaluations (University of Florida, Gainesville).

Diabetes-Related and Thyroid Antibodies

Serum antibodies were measured within three months after the initial diagnosis of diabetes. Islet-cell antibodies were measured by an indirect immunofluorescence method (with an abnormal value defined as more than 5 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation units),4 IA-2 antibodies with an immunoprecipitation assay kit (with an abnormal value defined as more than 0.75 unit per milliliter) (Cosmic),14 and insulin antibodies with a liquid-phase radioimmunoassay (with an abnormal value defined as higher than the 99th percentile for 140 normal subjects).15,16 Thyroid antimicrosomal antibodies were measured by a hemagglutination assay (with an abnormal value defined as greater than 1:100).17

HLA Typing and Mitochondrial-DNA Analysis

Genomic and mitochondrial DNA were extracted from peripheral-blood leukocytes. The HLA class II antigen haplotype and the presence or absence of a guanine-for-adenine substitution at position 3243 in mitochondrial DNA were determined.5,18 No mitochondrial mutations were detected.

Pancreatic Studies

Pancreatic biopsies were performed in six patients within five months after the initial diagnosis of diabetes, as reported previously.3,4,5 The biopsy specimens were examined after staining with hematoxylin and eosin and by indirect immunohistochemical methods. To detect insulitis, a double immunofluorescence method was used with monoclonal antihuman CD3+ T-lymphocyte antibody, B-lymphocyte antibody, or macrophage antibody and anti-insulin or anti-glucagon antibodies. We also examined the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I antigens in islets with the use of antihuman HLA-A, B, and C antibodies. The sources of these antibodies have been reported previously.4

To examine the relation between lymphocytes or macrophages and pancreatic exocrine tissue, we stained the cells with peroxidase substrate solution containing diaminobenzidine tetrachloride–nickel chloride (Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, Calif.). The sections were then incubated with antihuman alpha-amylase antibody (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis), and the pancreatic exocrine cells were stained with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (Dakopatts, Glostrup, Denmark).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test or Fisher's exact probability test, as appropriate.

Results

Serum glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies were detected in 36 patients (64 percent) and were not detected in 20 patients (36 percent). The patients without glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies were divided into two subgroups according to the initial glycosylated hemoglobin value: those with values of less than 8.5 percent, and those with values of more than 11.5 percent (Figure 1).


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Glycosylated Hemoglobin Values at the Time of the Diagnosis of Diabetes in 56 Patients, According to Whether the Test for Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD) Antibodies Was Positive or Negative.

The values for glycosylated hemoglobin in the patients with positive antibody tests are scattered, whereas the values in the patients with negative antibody tests are clearly divided into two groups: those below 8.5 percent and those above 11.5 percent. The broken line indicates the upper limit of the normal range for glycosylated hemoglobin.

 
The clinical characteristics of the patients with positive tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and those of the two groups of patients with negative tests are shown in Table 1. The mean duration of hyperglycemic symptoms in the patients with negative tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and low glycosylated hemoglobin values was only 4.0 days. This group had a significantly higher mean glucose concentration, despite lower glycosylated hemoglobin values, and a significantly lower mean value for urinary C-peptide excretion than did the other two groups. All the patients with negative antibody tests and low glycosylated hemoglobin values had diabetic ketoacidosis, as compared with 20 percent of the patients with positive antibody tests and 40 percent of the patients with negative tests and high glycosylated hemoglobin values. Serum pancreatic enzyme concentrations were high in all the patients who had negative antibody tests and low glycosylated hemoglobin values but not in the other two groups (Table 1), and the values fell to the normal range in 3 to 38 days (median, 17).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of 56 Patients with Type 1 Diabetes, According to Whether the Test for Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibodies (GAD) Was Positive or Negative.

 
All patients received multiple insulin injections, with a higher mean dose during the first year in the group of patients with negative antibody tests and low glycosylated hemoglobin values than in the other two groups (Table 1). Diabetes-related antibodies were not detected in serum samples from any of the patients with negative tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and low glycosylated hemoglobin values (Table 2).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Results of Other Antibody Tests at the Time of Diagnosis, According to Whether the Test for Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibodies (GAD) Was Positive or Negative.

 
The characteristics of the 11 patients with negative tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and low glycosylated hemoglobin values are shown in Table 3. The HLA class II haplotype was determined in 10 of the patients. The haplotypes most often associated with type 1 diabetes in Japanese patients,19 HLA -DRB1* 0405, DQA1* 0303, DQB1*0401 and HLA-DRB1* 0901, DQA1* 0302, DQB1*0303, were present in five and three patients, respectively. Two haplotypes associated with resistance to type 1 diabetes, HLA-DRB1*1501, DQA1*0102, DQB1*0602 and HLA-DRB1*1502, DQA1* 0103, DQB1* 0601, were found in two patients and one patient, respectively.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Clinical Characteristics of the 11 Patients with Negative Tests for Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibodies and Low Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Values at the Onset of Diabetes.

 
Pancreatic biopsies were performed in one patient with a negative test for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and a low glycosylated hemoglobin value (Patient 2 in Table 3) and in two other patients with similar findings (described previously5) who had been hospitalized before we started this study. In all three patients, no islet-cell antibodies were detected, hyperglycemic symptoms lasted for fewer than six days, and at least one serum pancreatic enzyme value was elevated initially. As a control, pancreatic studies were also performed in three patients with positive tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies or islet-cell antibodies and glycosylated hemoglobin values of 8.5 to 15.1 percent.

Light-microscopical examination of sections of pancreas stained with hematoxylin and eosin revealed small, atrophic, distorted islet cells in all six patients. However, none of the patients had edema, necrosis, hemorrhage, suppuration, cyst formation, fibrosis, or apparent atrophy of the exocrine pancreas. Immunohistochemical examination revealed a markedly reduced beta-cell mass in all six patients, as would be expected in patients with type 1 diabetes. The sections from all three patients with negative tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies had T-lymphocyte–predominant infiltration of the exocrine pancreas but no insulitis (Figure 2 and Figure 3). On the other hand, insulitis but no cellular infiltration of the exocrine pancreas was seen in the sections from all three patients with positive antibody tests (Figure 3). Hyperexpression of MHC class I molecules, another immunologic abnormality in islets, was seen only in the sections from the patients with insulitis.


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Photomicrographs of Double-Stained Pancreatic-Biopsy Specimens Showing Diffuse Infiltration of T Lymphocytes in the Exocrine Pancreas (x140).

Each pair of panels shows CD3+ T lymphocytes (green) and pancreatic alpha cells (red) in a biopsy specimen from one patient. Panels A and B, C and D, and E and F show specimens from three patients with negative tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase and islet-cell antibodies, and Panels G and H show specimens from one patient with positive tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase and islet-cell antibodies.

 

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. T-Lymphocyte–Predominant Infiltration of the Exocrine Pancreas in a Patient with a Positive Test for Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibodies (x200).

T lymphocytes (Panel A), B lymphocytes (Panel B), and macrophages (Panel C) were stained with peroxidase substrate solution containing diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride–nickel chloride (black), and exocrine pancreas was stained with antihuman alpha-amylase antibody followed by 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (pink). Counterstaining was performed with hematoxylin.

 
Discussion

Among 56 consecutive Japanese patients who had type 1 diabetes, we identified 11 with a subtype of diabetes that differed from autoimmune diabetes in three respects. First, no autoimmune features were detected. The patients did not have diabetes-related serum antibodies, such as islet-cell, glutamic acid decarboxylase, IA-2, or insulin antibodies. Pancreatic biopsies revealed neither insulitis nor hyperexpression of MHC class I molecules in islets.

Second, the onset of overt diabetes was rapid, and diabetic ketoacidosis occurred soon after the onset of hyperglycemic symptoms. The mean duration of hyperglycemic symptoms before the diagnosis was only four days. The short duration of hyperglycemia was reflected by the patients' nearly normal glycosylated hemoglobin values. Insulin-secretory capacity, estimated on the basis of urinary C-peptide excretion, was low, and the metabolic derangement at the onset was severe.

Third, the patients had markedly elevated serum pancreatic enzyme concentrations, a finding in accordance with the lymphocytic infiltration of the exocrine pancreas seen in the biopsy specimens. In contrast, the other patients had normal serum pancreatic enzyme concentrations and insulitis but did not have lymphocytic infiltrates in the exocrine pancreas. The edema, necrosis, hemorrhage, suppuration, cyst formation, and fibrosis that characterize classic acute or chronic pancreatitis were not present in our patients.20 In addition, none of the patients with negative tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and low glycosylated hemoglobin values drank moderate or large amounts of alcohol, only 1 had abdominal pain, and all 11 had normal findings on ultrasonography of the pancreas. Therefore, these 11 patients had a type of diabetes other than that caused by classic pancreatitis.10,11

On the basis of these findings, we believe that diabetes characterized by the absence of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and low glycosylated hemoglobin values should be classified as nonautoimmune, fulminant type 1 diabetes, a subtype of idiopathic (type 1B) diabetes. Some similar cases have been reported previously.21,22

The precise mechanism of beta-cell destruction in patients with this subtype of diabetes is not known. A viral cause is suggested by the abrupt onset of diabetes, the presence of lymphocytic infiltrates in the exocrine pancreas, and the affinity of several viruses for exocrine pancreatic tissue.23,24 In preliminary studies, however, none of our patients had high titers of antiviral antibodies (data not shown).

Further studies with younger patients and other ethnic groups may provide a better understanding of this subtype of diabetes. All our patients were adults, and the clinical features of type 1 diabetes differ to some extent in children and adults.25 Diabetes-related antibodies are more often detected in white patients than in Japanese patients,26 suggesting that nonautoimmune, fulminant type 1 diabetes may be rare in whites and that this subtype may therefore have been overlooked in studies of autoimmune diabetes in whites.

In conclusion, nonautoimmune, fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus in Japanese adults is a novel subtype of type 1 diabetes characterized by the absence of both insulitis and diabetes-related antibodies, an abrupt onset, and high serum pancreatic enzyme concentrations.

Supported by grants from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sciences and the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare.

We are indebted to Mr. Y. Sato (Yamasa Corporation) for performing tests of insulin autoantibodies.

* Other members of the Osaka IDDM Study Group are listed in the Appendix.


Source Information

From the Department of Internal Medicine and Molecular Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Imagawa at the Department of Internal Medicine and Molecular Science, Graduate School of Medicine, B5, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Japan, or at imagawa{at}imed2.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

References

  1. Eisenbarth GS. Type I diabetes mellitus: a chronic autoimmune disease. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1360-1368. [Medline]
  2. Bach JF. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus as an autoimmune disease. Endocr Rev 1994;15:516-542. [Free Full Text]
  3. Hanafusa T, Miyazaki A, Miyagawa J, et al. Examination of islets in the pancreas biopsy specimens from newly diagnosed type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia 1990;33:105-111. [CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Itoh N, Hanafusa T, Miyazaki A, et al. Mononuclear cell infiltration and its relation to the expression of major histocompatibility complex antigens and adhesion molecules in pancreas biopsy specimens from newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. J Clin Invest 1993;92:2313-2322.
  5. Imagawa A, Hanafusa T, Itoh N, et al. Immunological abnormalities in islets at diagnosis paralleled further deterioration of glycaemic control in patients with recent-onset Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1999;42:574-578. [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Foulis AK, Liddle CN, Farquharson MA, Richmond JA, Weir RS. The histopathology of the pancreas in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: a 25-year review of deaths in patients under 20 years of age in the United Kingdom. Diabetologia 1986;29:267-274. [CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lernmark Å, Klöppel G, Stenger D, et al. Heterogeneity of islet pathology in two infants with recent onset diabetes mellitus. Virchows Arch 1995;425:631-640. [Medline]
  8. Myers MA, Rabin DU, Rowley MJ. Pancreatic islet cell cytoplasmic antibody in diabetes is represented by antibodies to islet cell antigen 512 and glutamic acid decarboxylase. Diabetes 1995;44:1290-1295. [Abstract]
  9. Christie MR, Roll U, Payton MA, Hatfield EC, Ziegler AG. Validity of screening for individuals at risk for type I diabetes by combined analysis of antibodies to recombinant proteins. Diabetes Care 1997;20:965-970. [Abstract]
  10. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1183-1197. [Medline]
  11. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 1998;15:539-553. [CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Yamada K, Nonaka K. Diabetic ketoacidosis in young obese Japanese men. Diabetes Care 1996;19:671-671.
  13. Schmidli RS, Colman PG, Bonifacio E. Disease sensitivity and specificity of 52 assays for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies: the Second International GADAB Workshop. Diabetes 1995;44:636-640. [Abstract]
  14. Powell M, Chen S, Tanaka H, et al. Autoantibodies to IA-2 in IDDM -- measurements with a new immunoprecipitation assay. J Endocrinol 1997;155:Suppl 2:P27-P27.abstract [CrossRef]
  15. Vardi P, Dib SA, Tuttleman M, et al. Competitive insulin autoantibody assay: prospective evaluation of subjects at high risk for development of type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1987;36:1286-1291. [Abstract]
  16. Kawasaki E, Abiru N, Yano M, et al. Autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases: relation to competitive insulin autoantibodies. J Autoimmun 1995;8:633-643. [CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Imagawa A, Itoh N, Hanafusa T, et al. Autoimmune endocrine disease induced by recombinant interferon-alpha therapy for chronic active type C hepatitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:992-996. 
  18. Imagawa A, Nakajima H, Itoh N, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in pancreatic biopsy specimens from IDDM patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995;30:79-87. [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Yasunaga S, Kimura A, Hamaguchi K, Rønningen KS, Sasazuki T. Different contribution of HLA-DR and -DQ genes in susceptibility and resistance to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Tissue Antigens 1996;47:37-48. [Medline]
  20. Stirling GA. The exocrine pancreas: non-neoplastic disorders. In: Wight DGD, ed. Systemic pathology. 3rd ed. Vol. 11. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1994:621-47.
  21. Kimura N, Fujiya H, Yamaguchi K, Takahashi T, Nagura H. Vanished islets with pancreatitis in acute-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in an adult. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994;118:84-88. [Erratum, rch Pathol Lab Med 1994;118:864.] [Medline]
  22. Wakisaka M, Nunoi K, Wada M, et al. Two cases of abrupt onset type 1 diabetes associated with elevation of elastase 1 and diabetic ketoacidosis.J Jpn Diabetes Soc 1987;30:619-24. abstract.
  23. Gaines KL, Kayes SG, Wilson GL. Altered pathogenesis in encephalomyocarditis virus (D variant)-infected diabetes-susceptible and resistant strains of mice. Diabetologia 1986;29:313-320. [CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Hartig PC, Webb SR. Heterogeneity of a human isolate of Coxsackie B4: biological differences. J Infect 1983;6:43-48. [CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Karjalainen J, Salmela P, Ilonen J, Surcel H-M, Knip M. A comparison of childhood and adult type I diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1989;320:881-886. [Abstract]
  26. Imagawa A, Itoh N, Hanafusa T, et al. High prevalence of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in comparison to islet cell antibodies in patients with long-standing insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol 1996;92:43-52. [Medline]
Appendix

Other members of the Osaka IDDM Study Group included M. Namba, H. Nakajima, K. Yamamoto, H. Iwahashi, K. Yamagata, M. Moriwaki, T. Nanmo, S. Kawata, and S. Tamura (Osaka Univeristy); N. Itoh and T. Matsuyama (Toyonaka Municipal Hospital); I. Mineo and C. Nakagawa (Otemae Hospital); Y. Yamada (Sumitomo Hospital); H. Itoh (Ikeda Municipal Hospital); M. Kawachi (Izumi-otsu Municipal Hospital); H. Toyoshima (Mino Municipal Hospital); N. Watanabe, M. Hashimoto, and T. Kinoshita (Nishinomiya Prefectural Hospital); and H. Asakawa (Itami Municipal Hospital).


 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Lernmark, A.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

A Novel Subtype of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Honeyman M. C., Coulson B. S., Harrison L. C., Tanaka S., Kobayashi T., Momotsu T., Imagawa A., Miyagawa J.-i., Hanafusa T.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1835-1837, Jun 15, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.