FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 343:856-862 September 21, 2000 Number 12 Next

PDF Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article PubMed Citation

Androgen-insensitivity syndromes in 46,XY fetuses result in various degrees of impairment in genital virilization.¹ These syndromes are caused by mutations in the androgen receptor gene that result in decreased binding of androgen to the receptor.^{2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} As a consequence, the transcriptional activity of the androgen–androgen-receptor complex is reduced, and therefore, genital virilization is reduced. The androgen receptor, like other steroid hormone receptors, has two major transactivation domains¹⁰ — activation function 1 (AF-1) in the N-terminal region^11,12,13 and activation function 2 (AF-2) in the C-terminal ligand-binding domain¹⁴ — that interact with the target genes directly as well as indirectly by means of intermediary coactivators.¹⁵

We describe a patient in whom the complete androgen-insensitivity syndrome was diagnosed on the basis of phenotypic and endocrinologic findings, but who had no mutations in the androgen receptor gene. Detailed studies revealed that transmission of the activation signal from the AF-1 region of the androgen receptor was disrupted, suggesting that a coactivator interacting with the AF-1 region of the androgen receptor was lacking in this patient.

Case Report

A 19-year-old woman reported primary amenorrhea. The patient had normal breast development and normal female external genitalia, but she had no pubic or axillary hair, and the vagina was short (6 cm in length) and ended in a blind pouch. Abdominal exploration revealed no uterus, but testes were present, which were resected. Histologic examination of the testes revealed small numbers of immature Sertoli cells and germ cells and a moderate number of Leydig cells. Preoperatively, the patient's serum testosterone concentration was 614 ng per deciliter (21.3 nmol per liter) and her serum 5-dihydrotestosterone concentration was 49 ng per deciliter (1.7 nmol per liter); both values were within the normal range for men. The karyotype was 46,XY. The patient was given a diagnosis of complete androgen-insensitivity syndrome. Her two older sisters were not affected.

Methods

Analysis of the Androgen Receptor

The study was approved by the local institutional review committee, and written or oral informed consent for a genital-skin biopsy was obtained from the patient, another patient with complete androgen-insensitivity syndrome, and five normal men. Primary culture of genital-skin fibroblasts, androgen-binding assays, and sequence analysis of the androgen receptor gene were performed as previously described.^4,5,6,7,8,9 Tissue concentrations of androgen receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) were determined by a quantitative reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction assay (RT-PCR) as described previously.^16,17

Plasmid Construction and Reporter Assay

We constructed a firefly-luciferase–reporter vector (pGL3-MMTV), which was under the control of the mouse-mammary-tumor virus (MMTV) promoter, by inserting the mouse-mammary-tumor virus long terminal repeat promoter¹⁸ into a pGL3 basic vector (Promega). The expression vectors for the human androgen receptor,⁴ the human glucocorticoid receptor,¹⁹ and the C-terminal–truncated glucocorticoid receptor²⁰ were constructed as described previously. We used PCR techniques to assemble the expression vectors for an androgen receptor–glucocorticoid receptor chimera, a glucocorticoid receptor–androgen receptor chimera, a C-terminal–truncated androgen receptor, and an N-terminal–truncated androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor. To construct the expression vectors for p300,²¹ transcriptional intermediary factor 2,²² full-steroid-receptor coactivator-1,²³ androgen-receptor–associated protein₇₀²⁴ (also referred to as ELE1²⁵), and steroid-receptor RNA activator,²⁶ the complementary DNAs (cDNAs) of human origin were cloned and inserted into a pcDNA3.1 plasmid (Invitrogen).

Genital-skin fibroblasts cultured in six-well plates (0.3x10⁶ cells per well) were transfected with 7 µl of SuperFect reagent (Qiagen) per well; we used 1.5 µg of the firefly-luciferase–reporter vector (pGL3-MMTV) per well as the reporter and 3 ng of pRL-CMV vector (a Renilla luciferase vector, Promega) per well as the internal control. Depending on the experiment, we added to each well 0.2 µg of the expression vector for the androgen receptor, the glucocorticoid receptor, or the mutated receptors. Starting 3 hours after transfection, the cells were incubated for 48 hours in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium with 10 percent charcoal-treated fetal-calf serum in the presence or absence of 10^–7 M 5-dihydrotestosterone or 10^–7 M dexamethasone and were then solubilized with 150 µl of lysis buffer (Promega). The activities of the reporter gene were determined by a commercial kit (the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System, Promega), and the values were adjusted for the activity of the internal control (Renilla luciferase activity). We used one-way analysis of variance followed by Scheffé's test for multigroup comparisons.

Glutathione S-Transferase Assay

We prepared glutathione S-transferase–fused AF-1 proteins (involving amino acid residues 1 to 532 of the androgen receptor and 13 to 438 of the glucocorticoid receptor) using a baculovirus expression vector system (PharMingen). Fibroblasts from the patients and the control subjects, cells from an androgen-independent prostate-cancer line (LNCaP), and CV-1 cells were incubated with 500 µCi of [³⁵S]methionine per milliliter for 16 hours at 37°C. The ³⁵S-labeled cellular extracts were then incubated with the glutathione S-transferase–fused AF-1 proteins for 16 hours at 4°C. Molecules bound to glutathione S-transferase–fused AF-1 protein were purified with glutathione Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia) and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis. Dried gels were exposed to an imaging plate (Fuji) for three weeks, and the images were analyzed with a fluorescent-sample imager (Storm Fluorimager, Molecular Dynamics).

Results

Characterization of the Androgen Receptor

When the ligand-binding properties of the androgen receptor in primary cultures of genital-skin fibroblasts from the patient were examined, the maximal binding capacity of the labeled androgen analogue [³H]mibolerone was 9210 sites per cell, and the apparent dissociation constant was 0.52 nM, values that were close to the mean (±SD) values in the five normal men (mean maximal binding capacity, 9305± 2030 sites per cell; dissociation constant, 0.56±0.21 nM).⁴ The androgen receptor was not thermolabile.^5,6,7 The rate of nuclear translocation of the bound androgen receptor and the stability of the transfected androgen receptor were similar in fibroblasts from the patient and fibroblasts from the normal subjects when determined with use of a chimera of the androgen receptor and the green fluorescent protein²⁷ (data not shown). The mRNA concentration of the androgen receptor was also similar in the fibroblasts from the patient and fibroblasts from the normal subjects (data not shown). Direct sequencing of the PCR products for the exons of the androgen receptor gene and the coding region of the androgen-receptor cDNA prepared from the patient's fibroblasts revealed no mutations in the androgen receptor gene.

Activation of Transcription by the Androgen Receptor, the Glucocorticoid Receptor, Their Chimeras, and the Truncated Mutants

The absence of abnormalities in the androgen receptor gene in the patient suggested that the defect must be in the transmission of the transactivation signal from the ligand–androgen-receptor complex to the transcription machinery. To examine this possibility, we studied the ability of the normal androgen receptor to activate an MMTV–luciferase reporter gene in genital-skin fibroblasts (Figure 1). The degree of transcriptional activation induced by the glucocorticoid receptor was similar in fibroblasts from our patient, the normal subjects, and another patient with complete androgen-insensitivity syndrome, who had a mutation in the androgen receptor gene⁹ (Figure 1A). The degree of transcriptional activation induced by the normal androgen receptor in our patient's fibroblasts, however, was less than 9 percent of that in the normal fibroblasts, whereas the degree of activation induced by the normal androgen receptor in the fibroblasts from the patient with androgen-insensitivity syndrome caused by a mutation in the androgen receptor gene was similar to that in the normal subjects (Figure 1B). These results indicated that in the fibroblasts from the patient with androgen-insensitivity syndrome who had a mutation in the androgen receptor gene, as well as in those from the normal subjects, the system for the transmission of a transactivating signal from the androgen receptor was intact, whereas it was not intact in the fibroblasts from our patient. The degree of dexamethasone-dependent transcriptional activation induced by an androgen receptor–glucocorticoid receptor chimera, which consisted of the N-terminal domain and DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor and the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor, in fibroblasts from our patient was 12 to 17 percent of that in the fibroblasts from the patient with androgen-insensitivity syndrome who had a mutation in the androgen receptor gene and the normal subjects (Figure 1C). The degree of 5-dihydrotestosterone-dependent transcriptional activation induced by a glucocorticoid receptor–androgen receptor chimera consisting of the N-terminal and DNA-binding domains of the glucocorticoid receptor and the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor was similar in the fibroblasts from the patients and the normal subjects (Figure 1D).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Ligand-Dependent Transcriptional Activation by the Glucocorticoid Receptor (Panel A), the Androgen Receptor (Panel B), and Chimeras of the Glucocorticoid Receptor and the Androgen Receptor (Panels C and D) in Cultured Genital-Skin Fibroblasts from Five Normal Men, a Patient with Androgen-Insensitivity Syndrome Who Had a Normal Androgen Receptor Gene, and a Patient with Androgen-Insensitivity Syndrome Who Had a Mutation in the Androgen Receptor Gene. In the fibroblasts from the patient with androgen-insensitivity syndrome who had a normal androgen receptor gene, the degree of transactivation by the transfected intact androgen receptor (Panel B) or the androgen receptor–glucocorticoid receptor chimera (Panel C) was low because of defects in a coactivator specific for the activation function 1 (AF-1) region in the N-terminal region of the androgen receptor. This coactivator is an essential part of the process of the transmission of the transactivating signal. In the fibroblasts of the patient with androgen-insensitivity syndrome who had a mutation in the androgen receptor gene,9 the endogenous androgen receptor is inactive, but the transfected androgen receptor (Panel B) and the androgen receptor–glucocorticoid receptor chimera (Panel C) are active, because a coactivator specific for the AF-1 region of the androgen receptor gene is present. The transfected glucocorticoid receptor (Panel A) and the glucocorticoid receptor–androgen receptor chimera (Panel D) are active in all the fibroblasts, because this coactivator is present. Each experiment was conducted in the presence (denoted by plus signs) or the absence (denoted by minus signs) of 10–7 M dexamethasone or 10–7 M 5-dihydrotestosterone. Each bar represents the mean (+SD) of one experiment, which is representative of the results of five independent experiments. For each experiment, six dishes of fibroblasts from each subject were used. The mean activities of the reporter gene in the fibroblasts of the normal subjects were as follows: glucocorticoid receptor with 10–7 M dexamethasone, 202,414±18,653 relative luciferase units (RLU) per 10 µl of sample; androgen receptor with 10–7 M 5-dihydrotestosterone, 75,088±6832 RLU per 10 µl. From the five independent experiments, the reporter gene activities of the patient with the androgen-insensitivity syndrome who had a normal androgen receptor gene and the patient with androgen-insensitivity syndrome who had a mutation in the androgen receptor gene, relative to those in the normal subjects in the presence of ligand, were 108±12 percent and 102±13 percent, respectively, for the glucocorticoid receptor, and 9±1 percent and 95±10 percent, respectively, for the androgen receptor. The diagram above each graph shows the structure of the receptor. The italic numbers in the diagrams of the chimeric receptors represent the amino acid positions of the androgen receptor,10 and the roman numbers indicate the amino acid positions of the glucocorticoid receptor.19 The hatched regions and open regions in the chimeras represent the androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor origins, respectively. AF-2 denotes the activation function 2, NTD N-terminal domain, DBD DNA-binding domain, and LBD ligand-binding domain.

 
The transactivation function of the AF-1 region is ligand-independent and autonomous,^12,13,14 and that of the AF-2 is ligand-dependent.^14,15 The degree of ligand-independent transcriptional activation induced by the AF-1–containing N-terminal fragment of the androgen receptor in our patient's fibroblasts was approximately 20 percent of that in the fibroblasts from the patient with androgen-insensitivity syndrome who had a mutation in the androgen receptor gene and the normal subjects (Figure 2A), whereas the degree of activation induced by the N-terminal fragment of the glucocorticoid receptor was similar in the fibroblasts from the patients and the normal subjects (Figure 2B). The degree of ligand-dependent transcriptional activation by the AF-2–containing C-terminal fragments of the androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor was also similar among the three types of fibroblasts (Figure 2C and Figure 2D). These findings indicated that the transmission of the transactivating signal from the AF-1 region of the glucocorticoid receptor in our patient was normal but the transmission from the AF-1 region of the androgen receptor was impaired, results that strongly suggested the existence of a defect in a coactivator specific for the AF-1 region of the androgen receptor.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Transcriptional Activation by Truncated Androgen Receptors and Glucocorticoid Receptors in Cultured Genital-Skin Fibroblasts from Five Normal Men, a Patient with Androgen-Insensitivity Syndrome Who Had a Normal Androgen Receptor Gene, and a Patient with Androgen-Insensitivity Syndrome Who Had a Mutation in the Androgen Receptor Gene. Panel A shows the degree of ligand-independent transactivation induced by the activation function 1 (AF-1) region of the androgen receptor. Panel B shows the degree of ligand-independent transactivation induced by the AF-1 region of the glucocorticoid receptor. Panel C shows the degree of 5-dihydrotestosterone–dependent transactivation induced by the activation function 2 (AF-2) region of the androgen receptor. Panel D shows the degree of dexamethasone-dependent transactivation induced by the AF-2 region of the glucocorticoid receptor. Each experiment was conducted in the presence (denoted by plus signs) or the absence (denoted by minus signs) of 10–7 M dexamethasone or 10–7 M 5-dihydrotestosterone. Each bar represents the mean (+SD) of one experiment, which is representative of the results of five independent experiments. For each experiment, six dishes of fibroblasts from each subject were used. The diagram above each graph shows the structure of the receptor. NTD denotes N-terminal domain, DBD DNA-binding domain, LBD ligand-binding domain, and RLU relative luciferase unit.

 
The coactivators CREB(cyclic AMP–responsive element)-binding protein, p300, androgen-receptor–associated protein₇₀, full-steroid-receptor coactivator-1, transcriptional intermediary factor 2, and steroid-receptor RNA-activator increase androgen-receptor–induced transactivation.^{13,24,25,26,28,29} When these coactivators were also transfected in molar quantities that were greater by a factor of 1.5 to 3 than those of the androgen receptor or glucocorticoid receptor, the degree of transactivation induced by the androgen receptor in the fibroblasts from our patient was still less than 13 percent of that in fibroblasts from the normal subjects. In contrast, the degree of transactivation induced by the glucocorticoid receptor was increased in the fibroblasts from our patient and the normal subjects.

Electrophoretic Analysis of the Molecules Interacting with the AF-1 Region of the Androgen Receptor

The glutathione S-transferase analysis revealed that ³⁵S-labeled proteins corresponding to an apparent molecular mass of 90 kd (Figure 3) were interacting with the AF-1 region of the androgen receptor in the cellular extracts of the fibroblasts from a normal man (Figure 3A and Figure 3B, lane 3), LNCaP (Figure 3A, lane 7), and CV-1 cells (Figure 3A, lane 9). LNCaP and CV-1 cells are androgen-sensitive, as are normal fibroblasts.^30,31 However, the 90-kd protein was not detected in the extracts of fibroblasts from our patient (Figure 3A and Figure 3B, lane 5). ³⁵S-labeled proteins corresponding to a molecular mass of 76 kd (Figure 3) interacted with the AF-1 region of the glucocorticoid receptor in all the samples.

View larger version (68K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Electrophoretic Analysis of Proteins Bound to the Activation Function 1 (AF-1) Region of the Androgen Receptor (AR) and the Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR). Glutathione S -transferase (lane 1 of Panels A and B), a glutathione S –transferase-fused AF-1 protein of the androgen receptor (lanes 3, 5, 7, and 9 of Panel A and lanes 3 and 5 of Panel B), or a glutathione S –transferase-fused AF-1 protein of the glucocorticoid receptor (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8 of Panel A and lanes 2 and 4 of Panel B) was incubated with 35S-labeled cellular extracts of genital-skin fibroblasts from four normal men and from our patient, an androgen-independent prostate-cancer cell line (LNCaP), and CV-1 cells. The bound proteins were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis (7 percent separating gel). The asterisks indicate the 90-kd protein that bound specifically to the AF-1 region of the androgen receptor, and the circles indicate the 76-kd protein that bound specifically to the AF-1 region of the glucocorticoid receptor. The 90-kd protein was absent in the extracts of fibroblasts from our patient. Essentially the same 90-kd protein was detected in the extracts of fibroblasts from each of the four normal men.

 
Discussion

Our patient, who had the clinical and hormonal characteristics of complete androgen-insensitivity syndrome, had no abnormality in the androgen receptor gene. Detailed analyses of the action of androgen in the patient's fibroblasts indicated that the transactivation signal from the AF-2 region of the androgen receptor was transmitted normally to the basal transcription machinery but that transmission of the activation signal from the AF-1 domain was disrupted. The finding that the deletion of 187 amino acid residues at the N-terminal of the androgen receptor, which includes the AF-1 region,^11,12 caused complete androgen-insensitivity syndrome in another patient³ supports the conclusion that decreased transmission of a transactivation signal from the AF-1 region caused the syndrome in our patient. Since our patient's androgen receptor gene was normal, she must have had a deficiency in a coactivator necessary for the transfer of an activation signal from the AF-1 region of the androgen receptor to the transcription machinery.

Most of the known coactivators interact with the AF-2 region¹⁵ and are relatively nonspecific, in that they interact with multiple nuclear receptors. The protein type of coactivators, such as p300, androgen-receptor–associated protein₇₀, full-steroid-receptor coactivator-1, and transcriptional intermediary factor 2, all increase the transactivation of various nuclear receptors, including the androgen receptor, in the AF-2 region.^{13,24,25,28,29} However, induction of the expression of any of these coactivators did not correct the impairment in the transactivation function of the androgen receptor in the patient's fibroblasts.

Among the steroid hormone receptors, the structure of the N-terminal region varies, and this variation has been assumed to be responsible for the different effects elicited by the various receptors.^32,33,34 Furthermore, the existence of an accessory coactivator that interacts specifically with the AF-1 region has been suggested. Recently, an RNA molecule, a steroid-receptor coactivator,²⁶ has been shown to be an AF-1– specific coactivator of steroid receptors, including the androgen receptor, but supplementation with this molecule did not correct the impaired androgen-receptor–dependent transactivation in the fibroblasts of our patient. The absence of a 90-kd protein (which was present in fibroblasts from the normal subjects) or the loss of the AF-1 region's binding capability could be the cause of the androgen-insensitivity syndrome in our patient.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the transmission of a transactivating signal from the N-terminal region of the normal androgen receptor to the basal transcription machinery was disrupted in a patient with the androgen-insensitivity syndrome and that this disruption could not be corrected by supplementation with any known coactivators. We propose that there is a physiologically indispensable AF-1–specific coactivator crucial to the androgen receptor and that our patient had a newly identified form of steroid hormone insensitivity, a coactivator disease.

Supported in part by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture.

We are indebted to the late Dr. Kazuhiko Umesono (Kyoto University) for helpful suggestions and to Dr. Pamela J. Tamura (Vanderbilt University) for assistance in preparing the manuscript.

Source Information

From the Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka (M.A., R.T., A.T., K.I., K.G., T.Y., S.I., H.N.); Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology, Tokyo (R.T., K.G., T.Y., H.N.); and the Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo (S.K.) — all in Japan.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Nawata at the Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan, or at nawata{at}intmed3.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.

References

1. Nawata H, Takayanagi R, Yanase T, Ikuyama S, Okabe T. Abnormalities of sex differentiation. Horm Res 1996;46:Suppl 1:15-19. 
2. Quigley CA, De Bellis A, Marschke KB, el-Awady MK, Wilson EM, French FS. Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives. Endocr Rev 1995;16:271-321. [Erratum, Endocr Rev 1995;16:546.] [CrossRef][Medline]
3. Zoppi S, Wilson CM, Harbison MD, et al. Complete testicular feminization caused by an amino-terminal truncation of the androgen receptor with downstream initiation. J Clin Invest 1993;91:1105-1112.
4. Nakao R, Haji M, Yanase T, et al. A single amino acid substitution (Met⁷⁸⁶ Val) in the steroid-binding domain of human androgen receptor leads to complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;74:1152-1157. [Abstract]
5. Nakao R, Yanase T, Sakai Y, Haji M, Nawata H. A single amino acid substitution (Gly⁷⁴³ Val) in the steroid-binding domain of the human androgen receptor leads to Reifenstein syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;77:103-107. [Abstract]
6. Imasaki K, Hasegawa T, Okabe T, et al. Single amino acid substitution (⁸⁴⁰Arg His) in the hormone-binding domain of the androgen receptor leads to incomplete androgen insensitivity syndrome associated with a thermolabile androgen receptor. Eur J Endocrinol 1994;130:569-574. [Abstract]
7. Imasaki K, Hasegawa T, Ishizaka H, et al. Sporadic Reifenstein syndrome due to a de novo mutation (⁷⁴⁶Val Met) of the androgen receptor. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 1996;5:1-9.
8. Imasaki K, Okabe T, Murakami H, Fujita K, Takayanagi R, Nawata H. Premature termination mutation (⁷⁷²Glu Stop) in the hormone-binding domain of the androgen receptor in a patient with the receptor-negative form of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Endocr J 1995;42:643-648. [Medline]
9. Imasaki K, Okabe T, Murakami H, et al. Androgen insensitivity syndrome due to new mutations in the DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1996;120:15-24. [CrossRef][Medline]
10. Lubahn DB, Joseph DR, Sar M, et al. The human androgen receptor: complementary deoxyribonucleic acid cloning, sequence analysis and gene expression in prostate. Mol Endocrinol 1988;2:1265-1275. [Abstract]
11. Simental JA, Sar M, Lane MV, French FS, Wilson EM. Transcriptional activation and nuclear targeting signals of the human androgen receptor. J Biol Chem 1991;266:510-518. [Free Full Text]
12. Jenster G, van der Korput HAGM, van Vroonhoven C, van der Kwast TH, Trapman J, Brinkmann AO. Domains of the human androgen receptor involved in steroid binding, transcriptional activation, and subcellular localization. Mol Endocrinol 1991;5:1396-1404. [Abstract]
13. Ikonen T, Palvimo JJ, Jänne OA. Interaction between the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of the rat androgen receptor modulates transcriptional activity and is influenced by nuclear receptor coactivators. J Biol Chem 1997;272:29821-29828. [Free Full Text]
14. Moilanen A, Rouleau N, Ikonen T, Palvimo JJ, Jänne OA. The presence of a transcription activation function in the hormone-binding domain of androgen receptor is revealed by studies in yeast cells. FEBS Lett 1997;412:355-358. [CrossRef][Medline]
15. Horwitz KB, Jackson TA, Bain DL, Richer JK, Takimoto GS, Tung L. Nuclear receptor coactivators and corepressors. Mol Endocrinol 1996;10:1167-1177. [Abstract]
16. Mu Y, Takayanagi R, Imasaki K, et al. Low level of glucocorticoid receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in pituitary adenomas manifesting Cushing's disease with resistance to a high dose-dexamethasone suppression test. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998;49:301-306. [CrossRef][Medline]
17. Yokoi H, Natsuyama S, Iwai M, et al. Non-radioisotopic quantitative RT-PCR to detect changes in mRNA levels during early mouse embryo development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1993;195:769-775. [CrossRef][Medline]
18. Ham J, Thomson A, Needham M, Webb P, Parker M. Characterization of response elements for androgens, glucocorticoids and progestins in mouse mammary tumour virus. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16:5263-5276. [Free Full Text]
19. Hollenberg SM, Weinberger C, Ong ES, et al. Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature 1985;318:635-641. [CrossRef][Medline]
20. Hollenberg SM, Evans RM. Multiple and cooperative trans-activation domains of the human glucocorticoid receptor. Cell 1988;55:899-906. [CrossRef][Medline]
21. Eckner R, Ewen ME, Newsome D, et al. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of the adenovirus E1A-associated 300-kD protein (p300) reveals a protein with properties of a transcriptional adaptor. Genes Dev 1994;8:869-884. [Free Full Text]
22. Voegel JJ, Heine MJS, Zechel C, Chambon P, Gronemeyer H. TIF2, a 160 kDa transcriptional mediator for the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of nuclear receptors. EMBO J 1996;15:3667-3675. [Medline]
23. Takeshita A, Yen PM, Misiti S, Cardona GR, Liu Y, Chin WW. Molecular cloning and properties of a full-length putative thyroid hormone receptor coactivator. Endocrinology 1996;137:3594-3597. [Abstract]
24. Yeh S, Chang C. Cloning and characterization of a specific coactivator, ARA₇₀, for the androgen receptor in human prostate cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:5517-5521. [Free Full Text]
25. Alen P, Claessens F, Schoenmakers E, et al. Interaction of the putative androgen receptor-specific coactivator ARA₇₀ /ELE1 with multiple steroid receptors and identification of an internally deleted ELE1ß isoform. Mol Endocrinol 1999;13:117-128. [Free Full Text]
26. Lanz RB, McKenna NJ, Onate SA, et al. A steroid receptor coactivator, SRA, functions as an RNA and is present in an SRC-1 complex. Cell 1999;97:17-27. [CrossRef][Medline]
27. Georget V, Lobaccaro JM, Terouanne B, Mangeat P, Nicolas J-C, Sultan C. Trafficking of the androgen receptor in living cells with fused green fluorescent protein-androgen receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1997;129:17-26. [CrossRef][Medline]
28. Berrevoets CA, Doesburg P, Steketee K, Trapman J, Brinkmann AO. Functional interactions of the AF-2 activation domain core region of the human androgen receptor with the amino-terminal domain and with the transcriptional coactivator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor 2). Mol Endocrinol 1998;12:1172-1183. [Free Full Text]
29. Aarnisalo P, Palvimo JJ, Jänne OA. CREB-binding protein in androgen receptor-mediated signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:2122-2127. [Free Full Text]
30. Brady ME, Ozanne DM, Gaughan L, et al. Tip60 is a nuclear hormone receptor coactivator. J Biol Chem 1999;274:17599-17604. [Free Full Text]
31. Rundlett SE, Wu X-P, Miesfeld RL. Functional characterizations of the androgen receptor confirm that the molecular basis of androgen action is transcriptional regulation. Mol Endocrinol 1990;4:708-714. [Abstract]
32. Evans RM. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 1988;240:889-895. [Free Full Text]
33. Adler AJ, Danielsen M, Robins DM. Androgen-specific gene activation via a consensus glucocorticoid response element is determined by interaction with nonreceptor factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:11660-11663. [Free Full Text]
34. Gordon DA, Chamberlain NL, Flomerfelt FA, Miesfeld RL. A cell-specific and selective effect on transactivation by the androgen receptor. Exp Cell Res 1995;217:368-377. [CrossRef][Medline]

PDF Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Heemers, H. V., Tindall, D. J. (2007). Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: A Diversity of Functions Converging on and Regulating the AR Transcriptional Complex. Endocr. Rev. 28: 778-808 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lonard, D. M., Lanz, R. B., O'Malley, B. W. (2007). Nuclear Receptor Coregulators and Human Disease. Endocr. Rev. 28: 575-587 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kohler, B., Delezoide, A.-L., Boizet-Bonhoure, B., McPhaul, M. J, Sultan, C., Lumbroso, S. (2007). Coexpression of Wilms' tumor suppressor 1 (WT1) and androgen receptor (AR) in the genital tract of human male embryos and regulation of AR promoter activity by WT1. J Mol Endocrinol 38: 547-554 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kawate, H., Wu, Y., Ohnaka, K., Tao, R.-H., Nakamura, K.-i., Okabe, T., Yanase, T., Nawata, H., Takayanagi, R. (2005). Impaired Nuclear Translocation, Nuclear Matrix Targeting, and Intranuclear Mobility of Mutant Androgen Receptors Carrying Amino Acid Substitutions in the Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Binding Domain Derived from Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome Patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90: 6162-6169 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chen, G., Nomura, M., Morinaga, H., Matsubara, E., Okabe, T., Goto, K., Yanase, T., Zheng, H., Lu, J., Nawata, H. (2005). Modulation of Androgen Receptor Transactivation by FoxH1: A NEWLY IDENTIFIED ANDROGEN RECEPTOR COREPRESSOR. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 36355-36363 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Li, W., Cavasotto, C. N., Cardozo, T., Ha, S., Dang, T., Taneja, S. S., Logan, S. K., Garabedian, M. J. (2005). Androgen Receptor Mutations Identified in Prostate Cancer and Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome Display Aberrant ART-27 Coactivator Function. Mol. Endocrinol. 19: 2273-2282 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Umar, A., Berrevoets, C. A., Van, N. M., van Leeuwen, M., Verbiest, M., Kleijer, W. J., Dooijes, D., Grootegoed, J. A., Drop, S. L. S., Brinkmann, A. O. (2005). Functional Analysis of a Novel Androgen Receptor Mutation, Q902K, in an Individual with Partial Androgen Insensitivity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90: 507-515 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Taneja, S. S., Ha, S., Swenson, N. K., Torra, I. P., Rome, S., Walden, P. D., Huang, H. Y., Shapiro, E., Garabedian, M. J., Logan, S. K. (2004). ART-27, an Androgen Receptor Coactivator Regulated in Prostate Development and Cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 13944-13952 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chen, H., Hewison, M., Hu, B., Adams, J. S. (2003). Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) binding to hormone response elements: A cause of vitamin D resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 6109-6114 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bakin, R. E., Gioeli, D., Sikes, R. A., Bissonette, E. A., Weber, M. J. (2003). Constitutive Activation of the Ras/Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway Promotes Androgen Hypersensitivity in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 63: 1981-1989 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Song, L.-N., Herrell, R., Byers, S., Shah, S., Wilson, E. M., Gelmann, E. P. (2003). {beta}-Catenin Binds to the Activation Function 2 Region of the Androgen Receptor and Modulates the Effects of the N-Terminal Domain and TIF2 on Ligand-Dependent Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 1674-1687 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Thangaraj, K., Joshi, M. B., Reddy, A. G., Gupta, N. J., Chakravarty, B., Singh, L. (2002). CAG Repeat Expansion in the Androgen Receptor Gene Is Not Associated With Male Infertility in Indian Populations. J Androl 23: 815-818 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Thin, T. H., Kim, E., Yeh, S., Sampson, E. R., Chen, Y.-T., Collins, L. L., Basavappa, R., Chang, C. (2002). Mutations in the Helix 3 Region of the Androgen Receptor Abrogate ARA70 Promotion of 17beta -Estradiol-induced Androgen Receptor Transactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 36499-36508 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhao, Y., Goto, K., Saitoh, M., Yanase, T., Nomura, M., Okabe, T., Takayanagi, R., Nawata, H. (2002). Activation Function-1 Domain of Androgen Receptor Contributes to the Interaction between Subnuclear Splicing Factor Compartment and Nuclear Receptor Compartment. IDENTIFICATION OF THE p102 U5 SMALL NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN PARTICLE-BINDING PROTEIN AS A COACTIVATOR FOR THE RECEPTOR. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 30031-30039 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gelmann, E. P. (2002). Molecular Biology of the Androgen Receptor. JCO 20: 3001-3015 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Achermann, J. C., Ozisik, G., Meeks, J. J., Jameson, J. L. (2002). Genetic Causes of Human Reproductive Disease. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87: 2447-2454 [Full Text]  
• Takahashi, N., Kawada, T., Yamamoto, T., Goto, T., Taimatsu, A., Aoki, N., Kawasaki, H., Taira, K., Yokoyama, K. K., Kamei, Y., Fushiki, T. (2002). Overexpression and Ribozyme-mediated Targeting of Transcriptional Coactivators CREB-binding Protein and p300 Revealed Their Indispensable Roles in Adipocyte Differentiation through the Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor gamma. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 16906-16912 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Saitoh, M., Takayanagi, R., Goto, K., Fukamizu, A., Tomura, A., Yanase, T., Nawata, H. (2002). The Presence of Both the Amino- and Carboxyl-Terminal Domains in the AR Is Essential for the Completion of a Transcriptionally Active Form with Coactivators and Intranuclear Compartmentalization Common to the Steroid Hormone Receptors: A Three-Dimensional Imaging Study. Mol. Endocrinol. 16: 694-706 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miyamoto, H., Rahman, M., Takatera, H., Kang, H.-Y., Yeh, S., Chang, H.-C., Nishimura, K., Fujimoto, N., Chang, C. (2002). A Dominant-negative Mutant of Androgen Receptor Coregulator ARA54 Inhibits Androgen Receptor-mediated Prostate Cancer Growth. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 4609-4617 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Markus, S. M., Taneja, S. S., Logan, S. K., Li, W., Ha, S., Hittelman, A. B., Rogatsky, I., Garabedian, M. J. (2002). Identification and Characterization of ART-27, a Novel Coactivator for the Androgen Receptor N Terminus. Mol. Biol. Cell 13: 670-682 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hughes, I. A. (2001). Minireview: Sex Differentiation. Endocrinology 142: 3281-3287 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Thompson, J., Saatcioglu, F., Janne, O. A., Palvimo, J. J. (2001). Disrupted Amino- and Carboxyl-Terminal Interactions of the Androgen Receptor Are Linked to Androgen Insensitivity. Mol. Endocrinol. 15: 923-935 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hughes, I. A. (2000). A Novel Explanation for Resistance to Androgens. NEJM 343: 880-882 [Full Text]  
• Tomura, A., Goto, K., Morinaga, H., Nomura, M., Okabe, T., Yanase, T., Takayanagi, R., Nawata, H. (2001). The Subnuclear Three-dimensional Image Analysis of Androgen Receptor Fused to Green Fluorescence Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 28395-28401 [Abstract] [Full Text]