|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Background Asymptomatic bacteriuria is common in young women, but little is known about its pathogenesis, natural history, risk factors, and temporal association with symptomatic urinary tract infection.
Methods We prospectively evaluated 796 sexually active, nonpregnant women from 18 through 40 years of age over a period of six months for the occurrence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (defined as at least 10 5 colony-forming units of urinary tract pathogens per milliliter). The women were patients at either a university student health center or a health maintenance organization (HMO). Periodic urine cultures were taken, daily diaries were kept, and regularly scheduled interviews were performed. Escherichia coli strains were tested for hemolysin, the papG genotype, and the ribosomal RNA type.
Results The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (the proportion of urine cultures with bacteriuria in asymptomatic women) was 5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 4 percent to 6 percent) among women in the university group and 6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 percent to 8 percent) among women in the HMO group. Persistent asymptomatic bacteriuria with the same E. coli strain was rare. Symptomatic urinary tract infection developed within one week after 8 percent of occasions on which a culture showed asymptomatic bacteriuria, as compared with 1 percent of occasions when asymptomatic bacteriuria was not found (P<0.001). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was associated with the same risk factors as for symptomatic urinary tract infection, particularly the use of a diaphragm plus spermicide and sexual intercourse.
Conclusions Asymptomatic bacteriuria in young women is common but rarely persists. It is a strong predictor of subsequent symptomatic urinary tract infection.
Even though asymptomatic bacteriuria is common and appears to be associated with adverse outcomes in some groups, such as pyelonephritis in pregnant women,4,7,8,12 little is known about its pathogenesis, natural history, risk factors, and temporal association with symptomatic urinary tract infection. We undertook this study to evaluate these factors in healthy women, using a prospective study design and molecular typing methods.
Methods
Study Design
The overall study design and methods have been described previously.13 Briefly, the study was conducted from 1989 to 1994 at the University of Washington Student Health Center and at a health maintenance organization (HMO), the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, both in Seattle. The study was approved by the review committees of both institutions, and all the women gave written informed consent. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were healthy, were between 18 and 40 years old, were about to start using a new method of contraception (oral contraceptive, diaphragm plus spermicide, spermicide alone, or cervical cap) or had started using a new method within 6 weeks before enrollment, and had had no more than one urinary tract infection in the previous 12 months. Women were ineligible if they were pregnant or planning to become pregnant, had a chronic illness requiring medical supervision, had taken an antimicrobial drug within the previous 14 days, or had a known anatomical or functional abnormality of the urinary tract.
Evaluation of Study Subjects
At the initial visit, the women were interviewed with the use of a standardized questionnaire. A midstream urine specimen was obtained for evaluation of pyuria (at the university site only) and bacteriuria, and blood and saliva were obtained for determination of ABO-blood-group secretor status. The women were then instructed to record in a diary the days on which the following occurred: sexual intercourse, use of contraception (and type used), vaginal and urinary symptoms, and antibiotic use. At each subsequent visit to the clinic, the women underwent a directed history taking, their diaries were reviewed to ensure compliance, and a midstream urine specimen was collected. The women in the university group were asked to return to the clinic weekly for four weeks and then monthly, for a total of six months. The women in the HMO group were asked to return every two months for six months. In the alternate months, these women were asked to bring or mail to the clinic an agar-coated slide (Oxoid, Unipath, Ogdensburg, N.Y.) that had been dipped in urine, which was then cultured to identify and quantify urinary bacteria.
Laboratory Studies
Midstream urine specimens were collected for aerobic bacterial cultures and evaluated microbiologically by previously described methods.14 Pyuria was defined as the presence of at least 8 leukocytes per cubic millimeter of urine, as determined by a hemacytometer. ABO-blood-group secretor status and Escherichia coli hemolysin production and papG genotypes (at the university site only) were determined in blinded fashion by previously described methods.15,16,17 The papG gene encodes the tip adhesin on P fimbriae.
Genomic-DNA isolation, restriction-endonuclease digestion, gel electrophoresis, and Southern blot hybridization were performed as previously described.18 Total E. coli ribosomal RNA (Sigma, St. Louis) was radioactively labeled by extension of random primers with the use of reverse transcriptase.19 Ribotyping was performed with the use of PvuII and EcoRI. Only isolates with 100 percent matching in the restriction-fragmentlength polymorphism patterns were classified as identical.
Definition of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection
Asymptomatic bacteriuria was defined by the presence of at least 105 colony-forming units of a urinary tract pathogen per milliliter in a culture of a midstream urine specimen obtained from an asymptomatic woman on a routine scheduled visit. An episode of asymptomatic bacteriuria was defined by the presence of either one isolated culture with evidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria or two or more consecutive cultures with evidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria due to the same species and, if E. coli was present, the same ribotype, with no intervening antibiotic therapy. A woman was considered to have a symptomatic urinary tract infection if she had dysuria, urinary frequency, or urinary urgency together with at least 102 urinary tract pathogens per milliliter. In the absence of a urine culture, a woman was considered to have a symptomatic urinary tract infection if she had received a diagnosis of a urinary tract infection from a health care provider or had been treated for urinary symptoms with an antimicrobial drug.13 Organisms considered to be urinary tract pathogens included gram-negative bacilli, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, S. aureus, enterococci, and group B streptococci. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, alpha-hemolytic streptococci, lactobacilli, diphtheroids, and mixed gram-positive flora were categorized as nonpathogens.
Statistical Analysis
The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was determined by dividing the total number of cultures with evidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria by the total number of routine scheduled urine cultures performed. Cultures performed when the woman was taking an antimicrobial drug for urinary tract infection were excluded from these analyses. For the analysis of the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, women were considered to be at risk when they had neither asymptomatic bacteriuria nor symptomatic urinary tract infection. The incidence was determined by dividing the total number of episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria by the total number of person-years at risk.
Univariate analyses to identify risk factors for asymptomatic bacteriuria were performed with age, marital status, race, history of urinary tract infections, ABO-blood-group secretor status, contraceptive use, and frequency of sexual intercourse as variables. Contraceptive use and frequency of intercourse were based on data reported in the diary, except that oral-contraceptive use was assumed to be daily as prescribed. We adjusted for multiple observations per woman by fitting logistic regressions with generalized estimating equations.20 This procedure enabled us to compute adjusted prevalences and their 95 percent confidence intervals, as well as to evaluate several risk factors simultaneously in multivariate models. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results
Three-hundred forty-eight women in the university group and 448 women in the HMO group were enrolled in the study and had at least one follow-up visit. There were 146 person-years of follow-up in the university group and 177 person-years in the HMO group. As compared with those in the university group, the women in the HMO group were older (mean age, 29 vs. 23 years), more likely to be married (61 percent vs. 10 percent), and more likely to be white (88 percent vs. 79 percent).13 During the study, there were 98 symptomatic urinary tract infections (0 to 3 per woman) in the university group and 82 (0 to 7 per woman) in the HMO group.13
Colony Counts, Pyuria, and E. coli Virulence Characteristics
A total of 3040 urine cultures (2 to 10 per woman) were obtained from asymptomatic women in the university group and 2691 (1 to 8 per woman) from women in the HMO group. The distribution of counts of colony-forming units of pathogenic organisms and the percentage of cultures with evidence of pyuria according to colony count are shown in Table 1. In both groups combined, there were 4530 cultures for which one or more follow-up cultures were available. On 68 (42 percent) of the 160 occasions when a culture from an asymptomatic woman had at least 105 colony-forming units of E. coli per milliliter, but on only 113 (3 percent) of the 4370 occasions when the culture had fewer than 105 colony-forming units of E. coli per milliliter, the next scheduled culture had at least 105 colony-forming units of E. coli per milliliter (P<0.001). Pyuria was associated with higher colony counts (Table 1). Moreover, pyuria was present in 9 (16 percent) of 58 episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria defined by one isolated culture, 6 (32 percent) of 19 episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria defined by two or more consecutive cultures, and 81 (94 percent) of 86 symptomatic urinary tract infections.
|
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria
Prevalence and Incidence
The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, adjusted for multiple observations per woman, was 5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 4 percent to 6 percent) in the university group and 6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 percent to 8 percent) in the HMO group. E. coli was the urinary tract pathogen in 110 (77 percent) of the 143 cultures with asymptomatic bacteriuria among women in the university group and 122 (80 percent) of the 152 cultures with asymptomatic bacteriuria among women in the HMO group. Eighty-three women in the university group (24 percent) and 96 women in the HMO group (21 percent) had at least one episode of asymptomatic bacteriuria. Episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria defined by at least two consecutive cultures with bacteriuria occurred in 19 women in the university group (5 percent) and 21 women in the HMO group (5 percent). Episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria lasting at least two months occurred in only three women in the university group and two women in the HMO group. Only one woman had asymptomatic bacteriuria with the same E. coli ribotype at all study visits.
The incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was 0.39 episode per person-year among women in the university group and 0.53 episode per person-year among women in the HMO group.
Molecular Characterization of E. coli Strains Causing Asymptomatic Bacteriuria
We evaluated 65 episodes of asymptomatic E. coli bacteriuria in women in the university group. Restriction-fragmentlength polymorphism typing (ribotyping) was performed on all but one E. coli strain isolated from a follow-up culture. The results after the initial cultures from these 65 episodes are shown in Figure 1. In 34 cases (52 percent), the next evaluation revealed neither asymptomatic bacteriuria nor symptomatic urinary tract infection; in 21 (32 percent), the next evaluation revealed asymptomatic bacteriuria (17 [26 percent] involving the woman's original strain of E. coli); and in 10 (15 percent), the next evaluation revealed a symptomatic urinary tract infection, 5 of which were caused by the woman's original strain of E. coli.
|
Risk of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection
In both groups combined, 23 (8 percent) of 295 cultures with asymptomatic bacteriuria were followed by a symptomatic urinary tract infection within one week (each of the 15 strain pairs for which information was available were of the same species and, for E. coli, the same ribotype), as compared with 44 (1 percent) of 5436 cultures with less than 105 colony-forming units of urinary pathogens (P<0.001 for both study sites). Of the 34 cultures with asymptomatic bacteriuria and pyuria, 5 (15 percent) were followed within one week by a symptomatic urinary tract infection. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was also associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection within one month.
Risk Factors for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria
In univariate analyses, factors significantly associated with asymptomatic bacteriuria were the use of a diaphragm plus spermicide, sexual intercourse, the use of spermicide alone, and the use of a cervical cap. There were no significant associations between asymptomatic bacteriuria and age, marital status, race, history with respect to symptomatic urinary tract infection, or secretor status. In multivariate analyses, the recent use of a diaphragm plus spermicide and recent sexual intercourse remained strongly associated with asymptomatic bacteriuria in both groups, whereas use of spermicide alone and use of a cervical cap were significantly associated in only one of the groups (Table 2).
|
The adjusted prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was 5 percent among women in the university group and 6 percent among women in the HMO group. Twenty-four percent of women in the university group and 21 percent of women in the HMO group had at least one episode of asymptomatic bacteriuria. Episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria consisting of at least two consecutive cultures with asymptomatic bacteriuria occurred in 5 percent of the women in both groups. These rates of asymptomatic bacteriuria are similar to those described in nonpregnant 8,9,10 and pregnant5,8 women, but higher than those reported in healthy schoolgirls.21 Episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria lasting at least two months, on the other hand, were very uncommon, occurring in fewer than 1 percent of women in both groups, and only one woman had asymptomatic bacteriuria at all study visits. On the basis of monthly cultures from asymptomatic women, the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was 0.39 episode per person-year among women in the university group and 0.53 episode per person-year among women in the HMO group. These are minimal estimates, since some episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria are likely to have occurred between the monthly scheduled cultures.
The use of the clean-void midstream method of collection and quantitative urine cultures to differentiate infection from contamination and to delineate the natural history of bacteriuria is well established.3,4,5 In these studies, there was an 80 percent likelihood that a voided midstream urine specimen with at least 105 gram-negative bacteria per milliliter would be followed by a specimen with a similarly high colony count, and two consecutive voided specimens were therefore needed to provide the same degree of accuracy as a single urine specimen obtained through a catheter in predicting bladder bacteriuria.4,5
In our study, only 26 percent of 65 cultures showing asymptomatic E. coli bacteriuria were followed by cultures showing asymptomatic bacteriuria with the same strain of E. coli, and persistent asymptomatic bacteriuria was rare. These numbers are considerably lower than those reported previously4,5 and suggest that the majority of episodes of asymptomatic E. coli bacteriuria are transient. The quality of our method of midstream urine collection is supported by the finding that only 10 to 14 percent of voided urine cultures had 104 or more colony-forming units per milliliter, which is similar to the 7 to 27 percent reported by Kass.4
Our finding that asymptomatic bacteriuria is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic urinary tract infection is in agreement with findings of other investigators.5,6,22,23 This association was stronger if pyuria was present, suggesting that some episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria may be early or subclinical urinary tract infections that eventually lead to the development of symptoms. Further evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from the observation that paired E. coli strains from episodes of asymptomatic bacteriuria and subsequent symptomatic urinary tract infection in a given woman were usually identical if the urine cultures were consecutive, but were usually different if there were one or more intervening negative urine cultures.
There are few other studies with which to compare our data on risk factors. In a casecontrol study, asymptomatic bacteriuria was associated with diaphragm use but not with sexual intercourse.24 In the two groups of women we studied prospectively, asymptomatic bacteriuria was associated with the same factors that predispose women to symptomatic urinary tract infection,13 particularly the use of a diaphragm plus spermicide and sexual intercourse.
Several virulence factors have been associated with E. coli strains that cause symptomatic urinary tract infections, especially pyelonephritis, but virulence factors have been less clearly defined for strains that cause asymptomatic bacteriuria.25,26 Hemolysin and papG, the gene that encodes the tip adhesin on P fimbriae, were tested in this study because these two factors have both been found to be more prevalent among strains that cause clinically severe urinary tract infections.26 In our study, the proportions of E. coli strains that were positive for hemolysin and papG were almost identical among women with asymptomatic bacteriuria and those with symptomatic urinary tract infection. In addition, the data on ribosomal RNA typing show that identical E. coli strains can cause either asymptomatic bacteriuria or symptomatic urinary tract infection in the same woman. The similarity of risk factors for both asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infection further suggests that E. coli strains that cause asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infection in adult women come from the same pool of fecal strains.
The generalizability of our findings is strengthened by the prospective study design, the daily recording of information of interest, the laboratory characterization of the E. coli strains, and the similarity of the findings in two different groups of women, one of which was representative of the women in the Puget Sound region.13 Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that asymptomatic bacteriuria is a frequent occurrence that results when urinary tract pathogens, particularly E. coli, enter the bladder without causing symptoms. The pathogens are usually eliminated by host defense factors, but they may persist for a short or, rarely, a long time or result in a symptomatic urinary tract infection. Over time, the process may be repeated with a different strain. It remains to be determined why symptomatic urinary tract infection occurs in only a small proportion of women with high levels of bacteriuria.
Supported by grants (DK 40045 and DK 47549) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
We are indebted to Elaine Henley, M.D., Elaine Jong, M.D., Kathleen Slettebak, Ingrid Helsel, R.N., Natalie DeShaw, Cathy Hutchison, Darlene White, Sarah McElroy, Jane Grafton, Patty Karlen, Fae Neumann, R.N., Wendy Bensussen-Walls, Sandy Howard, Lillie Stevens, Mary Fors, and Joyce Burgess for helping with patient enrollment and data collection; and to Cheryl Wobbe, Cynthia Fennell, and Amy Denton for laboratory assistance.
Source Information
From the Departments of Medicine (T.M.H., A.E.S., P.L.R., C.W., K.G., W.E.S.), Epidemiology (D.S.), and Environmental Health (M.S.), University of Washington School of Medicine and School of Public Health and Community Medicine; and the Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (D.S.) all in Seattle.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Hooton at Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave. (Box 359930), Seattle, WA 98104, or at hooton{at}u.washington.edu.
References
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |