Comparison of Two Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors, Tirofiban and Abciximab, for the Prevention of Ischemic Events with Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
Eric J. Topol, M.D., David J. Moliterno, M.D., Howard C. Herrmann, M.D., Eric R. Powers, M.D., Cindy L. Grines, M.D., David J. Cohen, M.D., Eric A. Cohen, M.D., Michel Bertrand, M.D., Franz-Josef Neumann, M.D., Gregg W. Stone, M.D., Peter M. DiBattiste, M.D., Steven J. Yakubov, M.D., Paul T. DeLucca, Ph.D., Laura Demopoulos, M.D., for the TARGET Investigators
Background In the setting of percutaneous coronary revascularization,agents in the class known as platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIainhibitors have significantly reduced the incidence of deathor nonfatal myocardial infarction at 30 days. We assessed whetherthere are differences in safety or efficacy between two suchinhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab.
Methods Using a double-blind, double-dummy design at 149 hospitalsin 18 countries, we randomly assigned patients to receive eithertirofiban or abciximab before undergoing percutaneous coronaryrevascularization with the intent to perform stenting. The primaryend point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction,or urgent target-vessel revascularization at 30 days. The trialwas designed and statistically powered to demonstrate the noninferiorityof tirofiban as compared with abciximab.
Results The primary end point occurred more frequently amongthe 2398 patients in the tirofiban group than among the 2411patients in the abciximab group (7.6 percent vs. 6.0 percent;hazard ratio, 1.26; one-sided 95 percent confidence intervalof 1.51, demonstrating lack of equivalence, and two-sided 95percent confidence interval of 1.01 to 1.57, demonstrating thesuperiority of abciximab over tirofiban; P=0.038). The magnitudeand the direction of the effect were similar for each componentof the composite end point (hazard ratio for death, 1.21; hazardratio for myocardial infarction, 1.27; and hazard ratio forurgent target-vessel revascularization, 1.26), and the differencein the incidence of myocardial infarction between the tirofibangroup and the abciximab group was significant (6.9 percent and5.4 percent, respectively; P=0.04). The relative benefit ofabciximab was consistent regardless of age, sex, the presenceor absence of diabetes, or the presence or absence of pretreatmentwith clopidogrel. There were no significant differences in therates of major bleeding complications or transfusions, but tirofibanwas associated with a lower rate of minor bleeding episodesand thrombocytopenia.
Conclusions Although the trial was intended to assess the noninferiorityof tirofiban as compared with abciximab, the findings demonstratedthat tirofiban offered less protection from major ischemic eventsthan did abciximab.
Percutaneous coronary revascularization for atheroscleroticdisease, most of which includes coronary stenting, is one ofthe most frequent medical procedures, with more than 1.5 millionprocedures performed worldwide in 2000.1 Over the past decadeseven large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials involvinga total of 16,770 patients who underwent percutaneous interventionshave established that the overall reduction in the risk of deathor nonfatal myocardial infarction2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 30 days afteradjunctive inhibition of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptorsis 38 percent. Three glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were assessedin these trials. Each agent has distinctly different bindingcharacteristics,10 specificity for the IIb/IIIa integrin, andcosts. However, there has not been an assessment of whetherthere are differences among agents in efficacy or safety. Thecurrent trial was designed to test whether the small-moleculeinhibitor tirofiban (Aggrastat, Merck, West Point, Pa.) wasnot inferior to the monoclonal antibody abciximab (ReoPro, Johnsonand Johnson, Malvern, Pa.) in patients who were expected toundergo coronary stenting.
Methods
Patients
The methods of the trial have been described previously.11 Inbrief, the study was conducted at 149 hospitals in 18 countries(see the Appendix), the protocol was approved by the institutionalreview board of each hospital, and all patients gave writteninformed consent. Patients were included if they were scheduledto undergo a coronary stenting procedure of a newly stenoticor restenotic atherosclerotic lesion in a native vessel or abypass graft. All lesions that were judged to have stenosisof more than 70 percent on angiography had to be amenable tostenting for the patient to qualify. Patients who were undergoingan elective procedure or one performed urgently were eligible,but patients with cardiogenic shock or an acute myocardial infarctionwith electrocardiographic evidence of ST-segment elevation werenot eligible. Patients were excluded if their serum creatininelevel was 2.5 mg per deciliter (221 µmol per liter) orhigher and if they had ongoing bleeding or a bleeding diathesis,including a platelet count of less than 120,000 per cubic millimeter.
Randomization
Patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomly assignedwith the use of a central interactive system. Randomizationwas stratified according to the presence or absence of diabetes.Patients could undergo randomization on the basis of prior angiographicfindings before the intervention was begun, but the protocolrestricted the intention-to-treat analysis to randomized patientswho had received the study drug.
Medications
On a double-blind, double-dummy basis, patients received thestudy drug intravenously immediately before revascularization.Tirofiban was given as a bolus dose of 10 µg per kilogramof body weight, followed by an infusion of 0.15 µg perkilogram per minute for 18 to 24 hours. Abciximab was givenas a bolus dose of 0.25 mg per kilogram, followed by an infusionof 0.125 µg per kilogram per minute (maximum, 10 µgper minute) for 12 hours. All patients received 250 to 500 mgof aspirin before the procedure and, when possible, were toreceive a loading dose of clopidogrel of 300 mg two to six hoursbefore the procedure. Both these oral antiplatelet medicationswere continued throughout the 30-day study period at a dailydose of 75 to 325 mg in the case of aspirin and 75 mg in thecase of clopidogrel. Heparin was administered at the start ofthe procedure at a dose of no more than 70 U per kilogram; thetarget activated clotting time was 250 seconds. The activatedclotting time was assessed five minutes after the study drugwas administered, and heparin use was guided by a predefinednomogram.11
End Points
The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardialinfarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization within30 days after the index procedure. A new myocardial infarctionwas defined as the finding of levels of the MB isoform of creatinekinase that were at least three times the upper limit of thenormal range in two separate blood samples or by the findingof abnormal Q waves in two or more contiguous leads. Plasmalevels of creatine kinase MB were measured at base line andevery 6 hours after the procedure for 24 hours (or at the timeof hospital discharge if the patient was discharged sooner than24 hours). For patients with a recent myocardial infarctionwho had had an elevated creatine kinase MB level before theprocedure, a value of more than three times the upper limitof normal and at least 50 percent above the last preprocedurallevel was required to meet the definition. All patients withthe potential diagnosis of myocardial infarction, by virtueof electrocardiographic changes, enzyme abnormalities, or clinicalsymptoms, and those who underwent urgent target-vessel revascularizationhad their data reviewed by an adjudication committee of cardiologistswho were unaware of the patients' treatment assignments. Twocardiologists had to reach a consensus before an event was counted;in the case of lack of concordance, the opinion of a third reviewerwas sought.
Secondary end points included each component of the compositeend point and the effect of the study medications on prespecifiedsubgroups defined according to the presence or absence of diabetes,sex, age (<65 years or 65 years), country in which the procedurewas performed (United States or other), and whether or not clopidogrelhad been given before the procedure. For an analysis of safety,the end points of major and minor bleeding complications weredefined according to the criteria of the Thrombolysis in MyocardialInfarction trials.12
Statistical Analysis
A total of 4300 patients were required for the study to have88 percent power to determine whether tirofiban was not inferiorto abciximab, given a 5.3 percent rate of events in the abciximabgroup4 and a one-sided 95 percent confidence interval. On thebasis of a lower-than-expected rate of events at the time ofthe interim analysis, the target sample was increased to 4750,in accordance with the protocol. Only patients who receivedany study drug were included in the analysis. The trial database was maintained in a blinded fashion until the data on theprimary end points were finalized and entered, at which timethe data base was locked. Data analysis was performed jointlyby investigators at Cleveland Clinic and Merck. The primaryend-point analysis was based on a Cox proportional-hazards modelthat compared the treatment groups with respect to the timeof a patient's first event. The primary hypothesis was thattirofiban would not be inferior to abciximab in reducing theincidence of cardiac ischemic events. The boundary was basedon the outcome of the Evaluation of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa PlateletInhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT) trial.4 In order to meet thepreset definition of equivalence, the upper bound of the 95percent confidence interval of the hazard ratio for the comparisonof tirofiban with abciximab had to be less than 1.47, consistentwith the preservation of a difference of at least 50 percentin the effect of abciximab as compared with that of placeboin the EPISTENT trial.4 The upper bound of the one-sided 95percent confidence interval was determined to be 1.51. Thus,the results did not achieve statistical significance. Sincethe noninferiority of tirofiban as compared with abciximab wasnot established, we could then assess whether it was superiorto abciximab without statistical penalty, an approach that wasprespecified in the protocol and supported by several biostatisticalauthorities.13,14,15,16 We used a two-sided 95 percent confidenceinterval to assess whether tirofiban was superior to abciximabin terms of the primary end point. Secondary end points wereanalyzed with use of a log-rank test, and all univariate analysesof individual end points or subgroups were assessed with useof the chi-square test. A P value of less than 0.05 was consideredto indicate statistical significance.
Results
Enrollment began on December 30, 1999, and was completed onAugust 25, 2000. A total of 5308 patients were enrolled: 2647patients were randomly assigned to receive tirofiban, and 2661to receive abciximab. Of these, 4809 patients actually receivedthe study drug (2398 in the tirofiban group and 2411 in theabciximab group) and 499 patients were excluded from the analysis(249 in the tirofiban group and 250 in the abciximab group),as prespecified in the protocol, because they did not receiveany study drug. Most of the excluded patients did not undergopercutaneous coronary revascularization, and no further datawere collected.
The base-line characteristics of the patients are provided inTable 1. In both groups, 95 percent of the patients underwentstenting, with at least one stent placed, and 95 percent ofthe lesions involved native coronary arteries. Tirofiban wasinfused for a mean (±SD) of 18.2±3.9 hours andabciximab for a mean of 11.9±2.6 hours. The mean doseof heparin was 6327 U in the tirofiban group and 6372 U in theabciximab group; the median peak activated clotting times were281 and 283 seconds, respectively.
Table 1. Base-Line Characteristics of the Patients.
The incidence of the primary end point was 7.6 percent in thetirofiban group and 6.0 percent in the abciximab group (Figure 1),a difference of 27 percent. The results of the test forequivalence did not achieve statistical significance (one-sided95 percent confidence interval, 1.51), and the assessment ofwhether abciximab was superior to tirofiban showed a significantdifference (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval,1.01 to 1.57; P=0.038). The absolute difference was largelythe result of a significant difference in the incidence of myocardialinfarction (6.9 percent in the tirofiban group and 5.4 percentin the abciximab group, P=0.04). The difference in the incidenceof events emerged soon after the procedure (Figure 1). Therewas a consistent effect on each component of the composite endpoint in the comparison of tirofiban with abciximab: hazardratio for death, 1.21; hazard ratio for myocardial infarction,1.27; and hazard ratio for urgent target-vessel revascularization,1.26 (Figure 2). The greater protective effect of abciximabwas particularly evident in larger infarctions, as shown inFigure 3, with the extent of the benefit increasing in concertwith the increase in creatine kinase MB levels.
Figure 1. Incidence of the Primary End Point, a Composite of Death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction, or Urgent Target-Vessel Revascularization, in the First 30 Days after Enrollment.
After 30 days, the incidence of the primary end point was 7.6 percent in the tirofiban group and 6.0 percent in the abciximab group (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.57; P=0.038).
Figure 3. Effect of Tirofiban and Abciximab on the Size of the Myocardial Infarction, as Reflected by the Creatine Kinase MB Level or by the Occurrence of New Abnormal Q-Waves in Two or More Contiguous Leads.
The horizontal lines indicate 95 percent confidence intervals. For each patient, only the first new myocardial infarction was included in the analysis.
The effects were consistent among a wide variety of subgroups(Figure 4), except in the subgroup of patients who underwentstenting for reasons other than an acute coronary syndrome.This was not a prespecified subgroup, but there was a statisticallysignificant interaction between the study drug and the clinicalindication. Among patients recorded by investigators as havingan acute coronary syndrome, the primary end point occurred in9.3 percent of those in the tirofiban group, as compared with6.3 percent of those in the abciximab group (hazard ratio, 1.49;95 percent confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.93). On the otherhand, among patients who underwent stenting for reasons otherthan an acute coronary syndrome, the primary end point occurredin 4.5 percent of those in the tirofiban group and 5.6 percentof those in the abciximab group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95 percentconfidence interval, 0.54 to 1.24). The P value for the interactionwas 0.016 in this subgroup. There was also a geographic differencein the magnitude of the benefit of abciximab treatment. Amongpatients treated in the United States, 7.7 percent of thosein the tirofiban group reached the end point, as compared with6.7 percent of those in the abciximab group (hazard ratio, 1.15;95 percent confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.45). Among patientstreated in other countries, the respective rates were 6.9 percentand 2.9 percent (hazard ratio, 2.42; 95 percent confidence interval,1.27 to 4.63). Both treatment groups appeared to benefit fromreceiving clopidogrel before the stenting procedure.
Figure 4. Hazard Ratios for the Composite End Point in Various Subgroups.
The horizontal lines indicate 95 percent confidence intervals.
There was no significant difference in the rates of major bleedingcomplications between the groups (Table 2); the overall ratewas low (0.8 percent). Tirofiban therapy was associated witha lower rate of minor bleeding episodes and thrombocytopenia,but the rates of platelet and red-cell transfusions were similarin the two groups (Table 2).
Table 2. Incidence of Bleeding and Thrombocytopenia.
Discussion
We conducted a trial comparing two inhibitors of platelet glycoproteinIIb/IIIa, a group of agents that has been extensively investigatedin the past decade in placebo-controlled clinical trials ofboth percutaneous coronary revascularization and the treatmentof acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina and myocardialinfarction without ST-segment elevation). Although the primaryhypothesis of the trial was that tirofiban would not be inferiorto abciximab, we found that tirofiban provided significantlyless protection from major ischemic events, as reflected bythe incidence of the composite end point of death, nonfatalmyocardial infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularizationand by the incidence of the individual end points. Most of theabsolute benefit of abciximab was attributable to the lowerrate of myocardial infarction with this therapy, particularlylarge infarctions. The efficacy advantage for abciximab wasnot accompanied by a high rate of major bleeding complications,which occurred in only 0.8 percent of the patients in the trial.Tirofiban was associated with a lower rate of minor bleedingepisodes and thrombocytopenia.
Tirofiban and abciximab differ significantly in the way in whichthey antagonize glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors, and this differencemay account for our findings. Tirofiban is a small, nonpeptidemolecule, with a short half-life and marked specificity forthe glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. Abciximab is a large monoclonalantibody directed against 3 integrin, has a prolonged half-life,and also binds to the v3 integrin (vitronectin) receptor (foundon endothelial and smooth-muscle cells) and to white-cell M2integrin receptors. Thus, only abciximab has the potential toinfluence the adhesion of platelets and endothelial cells andof platelets and white cells, as demonstrated in several studies,17,18,19,20whereas both agents are highly effective in blocking interactionsbetween platelets in the final common pathway of platelet aggregation.
Long-term follow-up of the patients in the current trial isunder way, and the findings may ultimately be helpful in determiningwhether there are differences between the groups in terms ofsurvival and benefits in patients with diabetes, such as a reducedneed for repeated procedures. Should differences in these endpoints emerge, they may be due in part to the endothelial-celland white-cell (nonplatelet) effects of abciximab.
An equally plausible explanation for our findings is that thedose of tirofiban we used did not provide a level of platelet-aggregationinhibition similar to that induced by abciximab. The dose oftirofiban we used has been studied previously and was shownin ex vivo experiments using light-transmission aggregometryto inhibit more than 90 percent of platelet aggregation fiveminutes and two hours after the bolus and at the end of theinfusion in response to 5 µM adenosine diphosphate.21Furthermore, using the rapid platelet-function assay22 in asubstudy of 66 patients, we obtained similar results. However,it is possible that at a critical point after vascular injuryand embolism of atherosclerotic material,23 the degree of plateletinhibition induced by tirofiban was not optimal. The lower rateof minor bleeding episodes in the tirofiban group may reflectthe lack of parity in the degree of platelet inhibition. Moreover,certain aspects of the studies used to determine the effectsof tirofiban, such as the low concentration of the agonist adenosinediphosphate or the use of the rapid platelet-function assay,may not be as valid as the use of stimulation with 20 µMadenosine diphosphate or conventional light-transmission aggregometry.
An interesting paradox has occurred as a result of the trialsof glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for two indications percutaneous coronary revascularization and acute coronary syndromes.Recently, the Global Utilization of Strategies to Open Arteries4 trial demonstrated that abciximab showed no evidence of efficacyas a primary medical therapy (without percutaneous coronaryrevascularization) for patients with unstable angina or myocardialinfarction without ST-segment elevation.24 On the other hand,tirofiban has been shown in two separate trials to have a significanteffect in patients with acute coronary syndromes.25,26 In patientswith elevated troponin T levels in one of these trials, therewas a 75 percent reduction in the rate of death.27 Possibleexplanations for this paradox include differences in the timing(precise vs. ambiguous) of the event, characteristics of theinjury (man-made vs. spontaneous), or the value of pretreatment,with consequent stabilization of the diseased segment. Whateverthe mechanism, both tirofiban and abciximab have a place intreating patients with ischemic heart disease, depending onthe clinical indication. There are as yet no published datato support switching from the use of tirofiban for the medicaltherapy of unstable angina to the use of abciximab at the timeof stenting.
Finally, the issue of cost must be addressed, since our trialwas aimed at validating the use of a less expensive agent forpercutaneous coronary revascularization. At most institutionsin the United States, the cost of treating a 75-kg patient withabciximab is approximately $1,350, as compared with a cost of$350 with tirofiban. This difference in cost fueled the hopethat the efficacy of the two agents would be similar. Althoughthis did not prove to be the case, efforts to develop more effectiveand less costly strategies are vital. In our trial, which reflectscurrent practices with third-generation stents, state-of-the-artanticoagulation, and adjunctive therapy with oral antiplateletagents, the rate of events of 6 percent in the abciximab groupat 30 days provides evidence of the need for even better strategies.Devices that protect against emboli, new anticoagulants, improveddosing schedules for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and theuse of antiinflammatory agents are all being pursued to achievethe goal of eliminating ischemic events at an affordable cost.
Presented at the American Heart Association meeting, New Orleans,November 15, 2000.
Supported by Merck.
Drs. DiBattiste and Demopoulos are employees of Merck.
* The investigators and research coordinators who participatedin TARGET (Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Trial)are listed in the Appendix.
Source Information
From the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (E.J.T., D.J.M.); the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia (H.C.H.); the University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (E.R.P.); William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich. (C.L.G.); Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Boston (D.J.C.); Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto (E.A.C.); Hôpital Cardiologique, Lille, France (M.B.); Medizinische Klinik der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.-J.N.); Lenox Hill Hospital, New York (G.W.S.); and Merck, West Point, Pa. (P.M.D., L.D.).
Other authors were Steven J. Yakubov, M.D. (Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio), and Paul T. DeLucca, Ph.D. (Merck, West Point, Pa.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Topol at the Department of Cardiology, Desk F25, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195, or at topole{at}ccf.org.
References
Lincoff AM. Stent scrutiny. JAMA 2000;284:1839-1841. [Free Full Text]
The EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994;330:956-961. [Free Full Text]
The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1689-1696. [Free Full Text]
EPISTENT Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet 1998;352:87-92. [Web of Science][Medline]
Randomised placebo-controlled trial of abciximab before and during coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: the CAPTURE Study. Lancet 1997;349:1429-1435. [Erratum, Lancet 1997;350:744.] [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
The IMPACT II Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of eptifibatide on complications of percutaneous coronary intervention: IMPACT-II. Lancet 1997;349:1422-1428. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
The RESTORE Investigators. Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1997;96:1445-1453. [Free Full Text]
Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2000;356:2037-2044. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Topol EJ, Serruys PW. Frontiers in interventional cardiology. Circulation 1998;98:1802-1820. [Free Full Text]
Moliterno DJ, Topol EJ. A direct comparison of tirofiban and abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization and stent placement: rationale and design of the TARGET study. Am Heart J 2000;140:722-726. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rao AK, Pratt C, Berke A, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial -- phase I: hemorrhagic manifestations and changes in plasma fibrinogen and the fibrinolytic system in patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1-11. [Abstract]
Snapinn SM. Noninferiority trials. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2000;1:19-21.
Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP). Points to consider on biostatistical/methodological issues arising from recent CPMP discussions on licensing applications: superiority, non-inferiority and equivalence. London: European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, September 1999. (See http://www.eudra.org/emea.html.) (See NAPS document no. 05598 for 9 pages, c/o Microfiche Publications, 248 Hempstead Tpke., West Hempstead, NY 11552.)
Hauck WW, Anderson S. Some of the issues in the design and analysis of equivalence trials. Drug Inf J 1999;33:109-118.
Morikawa T, Yoshida M. A useful testing strategy in phase III trials: combined test of superiority and test of equivalence. J Biopharm Stat 1995;5:297-306. [CrossRef][Medline]
Kaul DK, Tsai HM, Liu XD, Nakada MT, Nagel RL, Coller BS. Monoclonal antibodies to v3 (7E3 and LM609) inhibit sickle red blood cell-endothelium interactions induced by platelet-activating factor. Blood 2000;95:368-374. [Free Full Text]
Thompson RD, Wakelin MW, Larbi KY, et al. Divergent effects of platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 and B3 integrin blockade on leukocyte transmigration in vivo. J Immunol 2000;165:426-434. [Free Full Text]
Mickelson JK, Ali MN, Kleiman NS, et al. Chimeric 7E3 Fab (ReoPro) decreases detectable CD11b on neutrophils from patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:97-106. [Free Full Text]
Neumann F-J, Zohlnhöfer D, Fakhoury L, Ott I, Gawaz M, Schömig A. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on platelet-leukocyte interaction and surface expression of the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1420-1426. [Free Full Text]
Kereiakes DJ, Kleiman NS, Ambrose J, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study of tirofiban (MK-383) platelet IIb/IIIa blockade in high risk patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:536-542. [Abstract]
Steinhubl SR, Kottke-Marchant K, Moliterno DJ, et al. Attainment and maintenance of platelet inhibition through standard dosing of abciximab in diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 1999;100:1977-1982. [Free Full Text]
Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation 2000;101:570-580. [Free Full Text]
Bhatt DL, Topol EJ. Current role of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2000;284:1549-1558. [Free Full Text]
The Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) Study Investigators. A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1498-1505. [Free Full Text]
The Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) Study Investigators. Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1488-1497. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 1998;339:415.] [Free Full Text]
Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Goldmann B, Deu A, Langenbrink L, White HD. Troponin concentrations for stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes in relation to therapeutic efficacy of tirofiban. Lancet 1999;354:1757-1762. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Appendix
The investigators and research coordinators who participatedin the study were as follows: Steering Committee E.Topol (chair), L. Demopoulos, H. Herrmann, G. Stone, M. Bertrand,F.-J. Neumann, D. Ardissino, J.-P. Bassand, G. Beauchamp, T.Bunt, E. Cohen, N. Chronos, M. Cohen, C. Hamm, S. Kristensen,R. Lange, C. Miguel, B. Meier, D. Moliterno, S. Yakubov, A.Yeung; Data Safety and Monitoring Board S. King III(chair), K. Detre, W. Parmley, A. Ross; Clinical centers United States (3910 patients): D. Moliterno, I. Oster, A. Robakowski,H. Herrmann, D. Tardiff, C. Kowal, M. Geda, E. Powers, L. Snyder,C. Grines, S. Smith, K. Murie, D. Cohen, M. Trovato, S. Yakubov,J. Brooks, H. Parker, L. Leslie, B. Fowler, M. Frey, N. Fichter,T. Burghart, A. Heineman, R. McClure, J. Gadd, K. Price, J.Hermiller, T. Fisher, C. Wilmer, B. Guthrie, S. Neville, H.Dauerman, S. Ball, D. Cox, R. Short, J. Kramer, M. Cole, B.Catellano, J. Gill, T. Rothert, J. Pappas, J. Bittl, S. Owen,J. Jackman, M. Stocks, J. Margolis, A. Demoss, D. Senior, P.Adkisson, G. Stone, M. Astakie, M. Midei, M. Griffin, W. Bachinsky,A. Todd, K. Shaeffer, N. Chronos, M. Magner, D. Morse, B. Fielder,B. Titus, C. Patterson, P. Berger, D. Shelstad, R. Low, D. Oman,R. Nair, L. Hickel, R. Laurel, R. Stine, S. Lunow, F. Boucek,A. Wilson, A. Kugelmass, J. Wells, V. Van Hooser, M. Cohen,B. Connor, J. Traverse, D. Chose, J. Martin, C. Pensyl, D. Fish,M. Harlan, J. Zidar, J. Hillier, T. Amidon, W. Toy, D. Rubin,P. Wanetick, J. Haluka, C. Hirsch, K. Sayles, P. Casale, K.Knepper, N. Lakkis, S. Runchey, T. Hern, J. Blankenship, M.Kleman, M. Buchbinder, V. Nassar, Z. Ghazzal, P. Hyde, M. Rosenberg,E. Matuga, M. Ghali, M. O'Brien, K. Parr, J. Jackson, T. Isaacs,M. Remetz, C. Roberts, K. Bunger, M. Shah, L. Hines, R. Bajaj,J. Marden, J. Zerfas, B. Lachterman, M. Bittman, M. Mick, C.Maniaci, P. Leimgruber, E. Godfrey, K. Stroh, M. Schweiger,D. Warwick, P. Teirstein, K. Duff, M. Zenni, M. Baker, Y. Shalev,L. Henry, W. Schmidt, D. Lobacz, F. Leya, L. Wrona, J. Resar,K. Citro, A. Gradman, D. Stapleton, H. White, C. Walters, E.Enger, S. Graham, A. Villa, P. Terry, G. Chapman, D. Alred,G. Yates, A. Moreyra, S. Krieger, F. Feit, B. Gostomsky, F.Millhouse, M. Murphy, G. Paik, D. Gobin, R. Smalling, C. Underwood,C. Carter, A. Yeung, C. McWard, M. Sanz, C. Cole, S. Seides,M. Burgett, G. Beauchamp, P. Eikenberry, M. Gibson, J. Madden,A. Chu, J. Beck, B. Samuels, S. Schauer, D. Wortham, M. Shatley,S. Ramee, T. Piller, S. Griffin, T. Hanning, M. Weiss, J. Rainaldi,J. Popma, A. Lanina, A. Chowdry, D. Arani, M. Swenson, A. Ali,C. Trevino, J. Griffin, D. Zinno, A. Mundorf-Brown, P. Farrat,R. Shiroff, T. Belinski, B. Wilson, G. Scwarz, M. Whitney, A.Seals, J. Hartley, S. Sharma, G. Manzanilla, S. Katz, M. Berry,L. Clausen, R. Lange, S. Daly, J. Schumacher, C. Wimmer, E.Mason, M. Reisman, R. Foster; Spain (225 patients): A. Cequier,M. Gomez, M. Minguez, C. Martorell, J. Goicolea, M. Alonso,C. Macaya, M. Capote, T. Achutegui, C. Moris, J. Torre, A. Albarran,E. Mendez, J. Angel, I. Vila, A. Betriu, T. Martorell, T. Colman,E. Fernandez; Germany (122 patients): M. Weber, W. Bauernfeind,S. Beil, F. William, H. Stempfle, V. Klauss, T. Schiele, C.Werner, H. Engel, C. Hegeler, M. Guha, H. Klein, J. Molling,S. Brucks, A. Auricchio, W. Rutsch, U. Sechtem, G. Wehr, A.Arbogast, M. Honold, G. Hauf, A. Buttner, M. Haney, W. Motz,V. Bohlscheid, F. Szigat, H. Drexler, D. Hausmann, G. Mayer,A. Schaefer, F. Schroder, H. Schunkert, B. Benesch, S. Fredersdorf,F.-J. Neumann, G. Pogatsa-Murray, E. Fleck, J. Hug, P. Pfautsch,C. Hamm, M. Rau, T. Hennig, E. Muno; Canada (97 patients): E.Cohen, L. Balleza, R. Gallo, N. Gendron, J.-F. Marquis, J. Jelley,M. Dallaire, A. Barolet, J. Richards; Australia (87 patients):N. Jepson, C. Friend, P. Harris, C. McNally, C. Aroney, P. Cleave,I. Meredith, J. Plunkett, J. Kealey, L. Mahar, S. Conlon; UnitedKingdom (70 patients): A. Chauhan, C. Davies, S. Garg, C. Bucknall,P. Lambiase, S. Karani, M. Rothman, C. Davis, M. Preston, A.Gershlick, A. Stephens-Lloyd, K. Lathan, J. Hussain; Switzerland(54 patients): F. Eberli, D. Pfiffner, M. Pfisterer, D. Keller,P. Urban, W. Amann, A. Bossard; Italy (51 patients): D. Ardissino,L. Favaro, P. Stritoni, C. Cavallini, E. Bramucci, A. Repetto;France (30 patients): J.-P. Bassand, D. Pales; Mexico (30 patients):A. Garcia, J. Pena, M. Velez, L. Jaimes; Belgium (24 patients):M. Vrolix, M. Schafer, J. Boland, P. Baumans, C. Hanet, D. Huyberechts;Austria (22 patients): K. Huber, F. Weidinger, H. Huegel; Denmark(21 patients): S. Kristensen, D. Frydensberg; Sweden (16 patients):B. Lagerqvist, G. Alsjo, C. Henriksson, E. Svensson, E. Swahn,E. Logander, A. Bostrom, M. Allared, K. Jonsson; Greece (14patients): D. Sionis, G. Triantis; Portugal (14 patients): R.Seabra-Gomes, P. Simoes, B. Costa; Netherlands (13 patients):H. Plokker, J. Milhous, G. Veen; Norway (9 patients): H. Vik-Mo,A. Ervik, T. Rohmen, A. Gilde, K. Hegborn, R. Wiseth, M. Slette,P. Molstad, A.-B. Stoksflod; Cleveland Clinic CardiovascularCoordinating Center L. Borzi, A. Castellano, S. Chase,D. Chew, J. Cross, M. Drabik, J. MacKrell, T. Rosso, L. Wisniewski,V. Zovkic; Merck P. DiBattiste, L. Demopoulos, F. Sachs,L. Gazdick, B. Vlahos, D. Kerns, M. Flood, A. Brinton, H. Hark,B. Frye, B. Ryan, K. Harris, P. DeLucca, B. Rachwal, P. Gallagher,K. Dollings, D. Dubinski, C. Fletcher, P. Dellea; MedifactsInternational Medical Consultants T. Genna, C. Van Doren,M. Barakat, M. Pawlewicz, K. Story, M. Ratigan, B. Garrett,M. Mehra, A. Hirsch, A. Ray, K. Kerr, T. Taft, E. Parmalee,J. Gao.
Hirsch, L. J.
(2010). Conflicts of Interest, Authorship, and Disclosures in Industry-Related Scientific Publications-Reply-I. Mayo Clin Proc.
85: 201-203
[Full Text]
Valgimigli, M., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Tebaldi, M., van 't Hof, A. W.J., Campo, G., Hamm, C., ten Berg, J., Bolognese, L., Saia, F., Danzi, G. B., Briguori, C., Okmen, E., King, S. B., Moliterno, D. J., Topol, E. J.
(2010). Tirofiban as adjunctive therapy for acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J
31: 35-49
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fauler, J.
(2009). Clinical pharmacology of antithrombotic drugs in coronary artery disease. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis
3: 465-478
[Abstract]
Gurm, H. S., Tamhane, U., Meier, P., Grossman, P. M., Chetcuti, S., Bates, E. R.
(2009). A Comparison of Abciximab and Small-Molecule Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv
2: 230-236
[Abstract][Full Text]
De Luca, G., Ucci, G., Cassetti, E., Marino, P.
(2009). Benefits from small molecule administration as compared with abciximab among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: a meta-analysis.. J Am Coll Cardiol
53: 1668-1673
[Abstract][Full Text]
Potsis, T. Z., Katsouras, C., Goudevenos, J. A.
(2009). Avoiding and Managing Bleeding Complications in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. ANGIOLOGY
60: 148-158
[Abstract]
Mahmud, E., Prasad, A.
(2009). Optimal antiplatelet therapy during percutaneous coronary interventions includes glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors just eliminate the infusion.. J Am Coll Cardiol
53: 846-848
[Full Text]
O'Riordan, J. M., Margey, R. J., Blake, G., O'Connell, P. R.
(2009). Antiplatelet Agents in the Perioperative Period. Arch Surg
144: 69-76
[Abstract][Full Text]
Marzocchi, A., Manari, A., Piovaccari, G., Marrozzini, C., Marra, S., Magnavacchi, P., Sangiorgio, P., Marinucci, L., Taglieri, N., Gordini, G., Binetti, N., Guiducci, V., Franco, N., Reggiani, M. L.-B., Saia, F., on behalf of the FATA Investigators,
(2008). Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Eur Heart J
29: 2972-2980
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lincoff, A. M., Steinhubl, S. R., Manoukian, S. V., Chew, D., Pollack, C. V. Jr, Feit, F., Ware, J. H., Bertrand, M. E., Ohman, E. M., Desmet, W., Cox, D. A., Mehran, R., Stone, G. W., for the ACUITY of Trial Investigators*,
(2008). Influence of Timing of Clopidogrel Treatment on the Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv
1: 639-648
[Abstract][Full Text]
Coons, J. C, Battistone, S.
(2008). 2007 Guideline Update for Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Focus on Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
42: 989-1001
[Abstract][Full Text]
Patrono, C., Baigent, C., Hirsh, J., Roth, G.
(2008). Antiplatelet Drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest
133: 199S-233S
[Abstract][Full Text]
Harrington, R. A., Becker, R. C., Cannon, C. P., Gutterman, D., Lincoff, A. M., Popma, J. J., Steg, G., Guyatt, G. H., Goodman, S. G.
(2008). Antithrombotic Therapy for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest
133: 670S-707S
[Abstract][Full Text]
Valgimigli, M., Campo, G., Percoco, G., Bolognese, L., Vassanelli, C., Colangelo, S., de Cesare, N., Rodriguez, A. E., Ferrario, M., Moreno, R., Piva, T., Sheiban, I., Pasquetto, G., Prati, F., Nazzaro, M. S., Parrinello, G., Ferrari, R., for the Multicentre Evaluation of Single High-Dose,
(2008). Comparison of Angioplasty With Infusion of Tirofiban or Abciximab and With Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting or Uncoated Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The MULTISTRATEGY Randomized Trial. JAMA
299: 1788-1799
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kereiakes, D. J., Gurbel, P. A.
(2008). Peri-Procedural Platelet Function and Platelet Inhibition in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv
1: 111-121
[Abstract][Full Text]
May, A. E., Seizer, P., Gawaz, M.
(2008). Platelets: Inflammatory Firebugs of Vascular Walls. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.
28: s5-s10
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gurm, H. S., Smith, D. E., Collins, J. S., Share, D., Riba, A., Carter, A. J., LaLonde, T., Kline-Rogers, E., O'Donnell, M., Changezi, H., Zughaib, M., Safian, R., Moscucci, M., for the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiov,
(2008). The relative safety and efficacy of abciximab and eptifibatide in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention insights from a large regional registry of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention.. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 529-535
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ndrepepa, G., Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., Neumann, F.-J., ten Berg, J., Bruskina, O., Dotzer, F., Seyfarth, M., Pache, J., Dirschinger, J., Berger, P. B., Schomig, A.
(2008). One-year clinical outcomes with abciximab vs. placebo in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after pre-treatment with clopidogrel: results of the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial. Eur Heart J
29: 455-461
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gitt, A. K., Betriu, A.
(2008). Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Suppl
10: A4-A12
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bode, C., Huber, K.
(2008). Antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J Suppl
10: A13-A20
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dobrzycki, S., Kralisz, P., Nowak, K., Prokopczuk, P., Kochman, W., Korecki, J., Poniatowski, B., Zuk, J., Sitniewska, E., Bachorzewska-Gajewska, H., Sienkiewicz, J., Musial, W. J
(2007). Transfer with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban for primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. on-site thrombolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a randomized open-label study for patients admitted to community hospitals. Eur Heart J
28: 2438-2448
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fernandez-Perez, G. C., Vazquez, M., Delgado, C., Velasco, M., Vazquez-Lima, A., Rodriguez-Perez, J.
(2007). Pulmonary Hemorrhage in a Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am. J. Roentgenol.
189: W135-W137
[Full Text]
Anderson, J. L., Adams, C. D., Antman, E. M., Bridges, C. R., Califf, R. M., Casey, D. E. Jr, Chavey, W. E. II, Fesmire, F. M., Hochman, J. S., Levin, T. N., Lincoff, A. M., Peterson, E. D., Theroux, P., Wenger, N. K., Wright, R. S., Smith, S. C. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Adams, C. D., Anderson, J. L., Antman, E. M., Halperin, J. L., Hunt, S. A., Krumholz, H. M., Kushner, F. G., Lytle, B. W., Nishimura, R., Ornato, J. P., Page, R. L., Riegel, B.
(2007). ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: e1-e157
[Full Text]
Anderson, J. L., Adams, C. D., Antman, E. M., Bridges, C. R., Califf, R. M., Casey, D. E. Jr, Chavey, W. E. II, Fesmire, F. M., Hochman, J. S., Levin, T. N., Lincoff, A. M., Peterson, E. D., Theroux, P., Wenger, N. K., Wright, R. S., Smith, S. C. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Adams, C. D., Anderson, J. L., Antman, E. M., Halperin, J. L., Hunt, S. A., Krumholz, H. M., Kushner, F. G., Lytle, B. W., Nishimura, R., Ornato, J. P., Page, R. L., Riegel, B.
(2007). ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 652-726
[Full Text]
Authors/Task Force Members, , Bassand, J.-P., Hamm, C. W., Ardissino, D., Boersma, E., Budaj, A., Fernandez-Aviles, F., Fox, K. A.A., Hasdai, D., Ohman, E. M., Wallentin, L., Wijns, W., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), , Vahanian, A., Camm, J., De Caterina, R., Dean, V., Dickstein, K., Filippatos, G., Kristensen, S. D., Widimsky, P., McGregor, K., Sechtem, U., Tendera, M., Hellemans, I., Gomez, J. L. Z., Silber, S., Funck-Brentano, C., Document Reviewers, , Kristensen, S. D., Andreotti, F., Benzer, W., Bertrand, M., Betriu, A., De Caterina, R., DeSutter, J., Falk, V., Ortiz, A. F., Gitt, A., Hasin, Y., Huber, K., Kornowski, R., Lopez-Sendon, J., Morais, J., Nordrehaug, J. E., Silber, S., Steg, P. G., Thygesen, K., Tubaro, M., Turpie, A. G.G., Verheugt, F., Windecker, S.
(2007). Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J
28: 1598-1660
[Full Text]
Mahmud, E., Cavendish, J. J., Tsimikas, S., Ang, L., Nguyen, C., Bromberg-Marin, G., Schnyder, G., Keramati, S., Palakodeti, V., Penny, W. F., DeMaria, A. N.
(2007). Elevated Plasma Fibrinogen Level Predicts Suboptimal Response to Therapy With Both Single- and Double-Bolus Eptifibatide During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol
49: 2163-2171
[Abstract][Full Text]
Spinler, S. A.
(2007). Managing acute coronary syndrome: Evidence-based approaches. Am J Health Syst Pharm
64: S14-S24
[Abstract][Full Text]
Berry, C., Tardif, J.-C., Bourassa, M. G.
(2007). Coronary Heart Disease in Patients With Diabetes: Part II: Recent Advances in Coronary Revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol
49: 643-656
[Abstract][Full Text]
Antoniucci, D.
(2007). Differences among GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors: different clinical benefits in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome percutaneous coronary intervention patients. Eur Heart J Suppl
9: A32-A36
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chang, F.-C., Lirng, J.-F., Luo, C.-B., Guo, W.-Y., Teng, M.M.H., Tai, S.-K., Chang, C.-Y.
(2007). Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Head-and-Neck Cancers: Reconstructive Management by Self-Expandable Stent-Grafts. Am. J. Neuroradiol.
28: 181-188
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dzau, V. J., Antman, E. M., Black, H. R., Hayes, D. L., Manson, J. E., Plutzky, J., Popma, J. J., Stevenson, W.
(2006). The Cardiovascular Disease Continuum Validated: Clinical Evidence of Improved Patient Outcomes: Part I: Pathophysiology and Clinical Trial Evidence (Risk Factors Through Stable Coronary Artery Disease). Circulation
114: 2850-2870
[Full Text]
Hochholzer, W., Trenk, D., Bestehorn, H.-P., Fischer, B., Valina, C. M., Ferenc, M., Gick, M., Caputo, A., Buttner, H. J., Neumann, F.-J.
(2006). Impact of the Degree of Peri-Interventional Platelet Inhibition After Loading With Clopidogrel on Early Clinical Outcome of Elective Coronary Stent Placement. J Am Coll Cardiol
48: 1742-1750
[Abstract][Full Text]
Saw, J., Bhatt, D. L., Moliterno, D. J., Brener, S. J., Steinhubl, S. R., Lincoff, A. M., Tcheng, J. E., Harrington, R. A., Simoons, M., Hu, T., Sheikh, M. A., Kereiakes, D. J., Topol, E. J.
(2006). The Influence of Peripheral Arterial Disease on Outcomes: A Pooled Analysis of Mortality in Eight Large Randomized Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol
48: 1567-1572
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bertrand, M. E., Van Belle, E.
(2006). Triple antiplatelet treatment in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Suppl
8: G59-G63
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yang, Y-J, Zhao, J-L, You, S-J, Wu, Y-J, Jing, Z-C, Yang, W-X, Meng, L, Wang, Y-W, Gao, R-L
(2006). Different effects of tirofiban and aspirin plus clopidogrel on myocardial no-reflow in a mini-swine model of acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion. Heart
92: 1131-1137
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kaul, S., Diamond, G. A.
(2006). Good Enough: A Primer on the Analysis and Interpretation of Noninferiority Trials. ANN INTERN MED
145: 62-69
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ridker, P. M, Torres, J.
(2006). Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005.. JAMA
295: 2270-2274
[Abstract][Full Text]
Miller, W. L., Garratt, K. N., Burritt, M. F., Lennon, R. J., Reeder, G. S., Jaffe, A. S.
(2006). Baseline troponin level: key to understanding the importance of post-PCI troponin elevations. Eur Heart J
27: 1061-1069
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., Neumann, F.-J., Dotzer, F., ten Berg, J., Bollwein, H., Graf, I., Ibrahim, M., Pache, J., Seyfarth, M., Schuhlen, H., Dirschinger, J., Berger, P. B., Schomig, A., for the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic,
(2006). Abciximab in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Clopidogrel Pretreatment: The ISAR-REACT 2 Randomized Trial. JAMA
295: 1531-1538
[Abstract][Full Text]
Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., Pocock, S. J., Evans, S. J. W., for the CONSORT Group,
(2006). Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement. JAMA
295: 1152-1160
[Abstract][Full Text]
Glaser, R., Glick, H. A., Herrmann, H. C., Kimmel, S. E.
(2006). The Role of Risk Stratification in the Decision to Provide Upstream Versus Selective Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol
47: 529-537
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bolognese, L., Falsini, G., Liistro, F., Angioli, P., Ducci, K., Taddei, T., Tarducci, R., Cosmi, F., Baldassarre, S., Burali, A.
(2006). Randomized Comparison of Upstream Tirofiban Versus Downstream High Bolus Dose Tirofiban or Abciximab on Tissue-Level Perfusion and Troponin Release in High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The EVEREST Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol
47: 522-528
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mukherjee, D., Topol, E. J., Bertrand, M. E., Kristensen, S. D., Herrmann, H. C., Neumann, F.-J., Yakubov, S. J., Bassand, J.-P., McClure, R. R., Stone, G. W., Ardissino, D., Moliterno, D. J., for the TARGET Investigators,
(2005). Mortality at 1 year for the direct comparison of tirofiban and abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization: do tirofiban and ReoPro give similar efficacy outcomes at trial 1-year follow-up. Eur Heart J
26: 2524-2528
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dawkins, K D, Gershlick, T, de Belder, M, Chauhan, A, Venn, G, Schofield, P, Smith, D, Watkins, J, Gray, H H, Joint Working Group on Percutaneous Coronary Inter,
(2005). Percutaneous coronary intervention: recommendations for good practice and training. Heart
91: vi1-vi27
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mahaffey, K. W., Cohen, M., Garg, J., Antman, E., Kleiman, N. S., Goodman, S. G., Berdan, L. G., Reist, C. J., Langer, A., White, H. D., Aylward, P. E., Col, J. J., Ferguson, J. J. III, Califf, R. M., for the SYNERGY Trial Investigators,
(2005). High-Risk Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Low-Molecular-Weight or Unfractionated Heparin: Outcomes at 6 Months and 1 Year in the SYNERGY Trial. JAMA
294: 2594-2600
[Abstract][Full Text]
Valgimigli, M.
(2005). Tirofiban Plus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab Plus Bare-Metal Stent--Reply. JAMA
294: 1617-1618
[Full Text]
Shanmugam, G.
(2005). Tirofiban and emergency coronary surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.
28: 546-550
[Abstract][Full Text]
Beygui, F., Montalescot, G.
(2005). The use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors into new perspectives: pre-catheterization laboratory administration. Eur Heart J Suppl
7: I10-I14
[Abstract][Full Text]
Danzi, G. B., Mauri, L., Sozzi, F.
(2005). Percutaneous coronary intervention and beyond for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Suppl
7: K26-K30
[Abstract][Full Text]
Valgimigli, M., Percoco, G., Cicchitelli, G., Campo, G., Gardini, E., Pellegrino, L., Malagutti, P., Giretti, C., Ferrari, R.
(2005). New and old strategies to afford the liberal use of drug-eluting stents in real-life scenarios. Eur Heart J Suppl
7: K31-K35
[Abstract][Full Text]
Coons, J. C, Seybert, A. L, Saul, M. I, Kirisci, L., Kane-Gill, S. L
(2005). Outcomes and Costs of Abciximab Versus Eptifibatide for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
39: 1621-1626
[Abstract][Full Text]
de Winter, R. J., Windhausen, F., Cornel, J. H., Dunselman, P. H.J.M., Janus, C. L., Bendermacher, P. E.F., Michels, H. R., Sanders, G. T., Tijssen, J. G.P., Verheugt, F. W.A., the Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unst,
(2005). Early Invasive versus Selectively Invasive Management for Acute Coronary Syndromes. NEJM
353: 1095-1104
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cutlip, D. E., Kuntz, R. E.
(2005). Cardiac Enzyme Elevation After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Not an Independent Predictor of Adverse Outcomes. Circulation
112: 916-923
[Full Text]
Kelly, R V, Steinhubl, S
(2005). Changing roles of anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatment during percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart
91: iii16-iii19
[Full Text]
Valgimigli, M., Percoco, G., Malagutti, P., Campo, G., Ferrari, F., Barbieri, D., Cicchitelli, G., McFadden, E. P., Merlini, F., Ansani, L., Guardigli, G., Bettini, A., Parrinello, G., Boersma, E., Ferrari, R., for the STRATEGY Investigators,
(2005). Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Trial. JAMA
293: 2109-2117
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cohen, M. G., Ohman, E. M.
(2005). Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is Science Catching Up With Practice?. JAMA
293: 2154-2156
[Full Text]
Williams, D. O.
(2005). Clopidogrel Pretreatment for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Double, Double, Dose in Trouble?. Circulation
111: 2019-2021
[Full Text]
Sackner-Bernstein, J. D., Kowalski, M., Fox, M., Aaronson, K.
(2005). Short-term Risk of Death After Treatment With Nesiritide for Decompensated Heart Failure: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JAMA
293: 1900-1905
[Abstract][Full Text]
Brophy, J. M., Joseph, L.
(2005). Medical Decision Making with Incomplete Evidence--Choosing a Platelet Glycoprotein IIbIIIa Receptor Inhibitor for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Med Decis Making
25: 222-228
[Abstract]
Lansky, A. J., Hochman, J. S., Ward, P. A., Mintz, G. S., Fabunmi, R., Berger, P. B., New, G., Grines, C. L., Pietras, C. G., Kern, M. J., Ferrell, M., Leon, M. B., Mehran, R., White, C., Mieres, J. H., Moses, J. W., Stone, G. W., Jacobs, A. K., Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Fou,
(2005). Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy in Women: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation
111: 940-953
[Abstract][Full Text]
Matthai, W. H. Jr
(2005). Thrombocytopenia in Cardiovascular Patients: Diagnosis and Management. Chest
127: 46S-52S
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gluckman, T. J., Sachdev, M., Schulman, S. P., Blumenthal, R. S.
(2005). A Simplified Approach to the Management of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. JAMA
293: 349-357
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mehilli, J., Kastrati, A., Schuhlen, H., Dibra, A., Dotzer, F., von Beckerath, N., Bollwein, H., Pache, J., Dirschinger, J., Berger, P. P., Schomig, A., for the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic,
(2004). Randomized Clinical Trial of Abciximab in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions After Treatment With a High Loading Dose of Clopidogrel. Circulation
110: 3627-3635
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gyongyosi, M., Domanovits, H., Benzer, W., Haugk, M., Heinisch, B., Sodeck, G., Hodl, R., Gaul, G., Bonner, G., Wojta, J., Laggner, A., Glogar, D., Huber, K., for the ReoPro-BRIDGING Study Group,
(2004). Use of abciximab prior to primary angioplasty in STEMI results in early recanalization of the infarct-related artery and improved myocardial tissue reperfusion - results of the Austrian multi-centre randomized ReoPro-BRIDGING Study. Eur Heart J
25: 2125-2133
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wiggins, B. S., Spinler, S.
(2004). Antiplatelet and Antithrombin Therapy for Early Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Journal of Pharmacy Practice
17: 347-369
[Abstract]
Ernst, N. M.S.K.J., Suryapranata, H., Miedema, K., Slingerland, R. J., Ottervanger, J. P., Hoorntje, J. C.A., Gosselink, A.T.M., Dambrink, J.-H. E., de Boer, M.-J., Zijlstra, F., van't Hof, A. W.J.
(2004). Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol
44: 1187-1193
[Abstract][Full Text]
Saw, J., Lincoff, A. M., DeSmet, W., Betriu, A., Rutsch, W., Wilcox, R. G., Kleiman, N. S., Wolski, K., Topol, E. J., REPLACE-2 Investigators,
(2004). Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: A REPLACE-2 substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol
44: 1194-1199
[Abstract][Full Text]
Patrono, C., Coller, B., FitzGerald, G. A., Hirsh, J., Roth, G.
(2004). Platelet-Active Drugs: The Relationships Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest
126: 234S-264S
[Abstract][Full Text]
Popma, J. J., Berger, P., Ohman, E. M., Harrington, R. A., Grines, C., Weitz, J. I.
(2004). Antithrombotic Therapy During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest
126: 576S-599S
[Abstract][Full Text]
Vishnevetsky, D., Kiyanista, V. A, Gandhi, P. J
(2004). CD40 Ligand: A Novel Target in the Fight Against Cardiovascular Disease. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
38: 1500-1508
[Abstract][Full Text]
Brener, S. J., Moliterno, D. J., Lincoff, A. M., Steinhubl, S. R., Wolski, K. E., Topol, E. J.
(2004). Relationship Between Activated Clotting Time and Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Complications: Analysis of 4 Recent Randomized Clinical Trials of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation
110: 994-998
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lincoff, A. M., Kleiman, N. S., Kereiakes, D. J., Feit, F., Bittl, J. A., Jackman, J. D., Sarembock, I. J., Cohen, D. J., Spriggs, D., Ebrahimi, R., Keren, G., Carr, J., Cohen, E. A., Betriu, A., Desmet, W., Rutsch, W., Wilcox, R. G., de Feyter, P. J., Vahanian, A., Topol, E. J., for the REPLACE-2 Investigators,
(2004). Long-term Efficacy of Bivalirudin and Provisional Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade vs Heparin and Planned Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: REPLACE-2 Randomized Trial. JAMA
292: 696-703
[Abstract][Full Text]
Goto, S., Tamura, N., Ishida, H.
(2004). Ability of anti-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents to dissolve platelet thrombi formed on a collagen surface under blood flow conditions. J Am Coll Cardiol
44: 316-323
[Abstract][Full Text]
Valgimigli, M., Percoco, G., Barbieri, D., Ferrari, F., Guardigli, G., Parrinello, G., Soukhomovskaia, O., Ferrari, R.
(2004). The additive value of tirofiban administered with the high-dose bolus in the prevention of ischemic complications during high-risk coronary angioplasty: The advance trial. J Am Coll Cardiol
44: 14-19
[Abstract][Full Text]
Montalescot, G, Andersen, H R, Antoniucci, D, Betriu, A, de Boer, M J, Grip, L, Neumann, F J, Rothman, M T
(2004). Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart
90: e37-e37
[Abstract][Full Text]
Merlini, P. A., Rossi, M., Menozzi, A., Buratti, S., Brennan, D. M., Moliterno, D. J., Topol, E. J., Ardissino, D.
(2004). Thrombocytopenia Caused by Abciximab or Tirofiban and Its Association With Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting. Circulation
109: 2203-2206
[Abstract][Full Text]
Buttner, H. J., Neumann, F.-J.
(2004). Tirofiban for catheter intervention in acute myocardial infarction?. Eur Heart J
25: 807-809
[Full Text]
Behan, M W H, Storey, R F
(2004). Antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease. Postgrad. Med. J.
80: 155-164
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hirsch, L.
(2004). Randomized clinical trials: What gets published, and when?. CMAJ
170: 481-483
[Full Text]
Dalby, M., Montalescot, G., Sollier, C. B. d., Vicaut, E., Soulat, T., Collet, J.-P., Choussat, R., Gallois, V., Drobinski, G., Drouet, L., Thomas, D.
(2004). Eptifibatide provides additional platelet inhibition in Non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction patients already treated with aspirin and clopidogrel: Results of the platelet activity extinction in Non-Q-Wave myocardial infarction with aspirin, clopidogrel, and eptifibatide (PEACE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol
43: 162-168
[Abstract][Full Text]
Berger, P.
(2004). Ranolazine and Other Antianginal Therapies in the Era of the Drug-Eluting Stent. JAMA
291: 365-367
[Full Text]
Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., Schuhlen, H., Dirschinger, J., Dotzer, F., ten Berg, J. M., Neumann, F.-J., Bollwein, H., Volmer, C., Gawaz, M., Berger, P. B., Schomig, A., the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regi,
(2004). A Clinical Trial of Abciximab in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Pretreatment with Clopidogrel. NEJM
350: 232-238
[Abstract][Full Text]
Miller, W. L., Garratt, K. N., Burritt, M. F., Reeder, G. S., Jaffe, A. S.
(2004). Timing of Peak Troponin T and Creatine Kinase-MB Elevations After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Chest
125: 275-280
[Abstract][Full Text]
Baker, C. S R
(2004). Learning on the Web. Case 3: acute chest pain.. Heart
90: 112-112
[Full Text]