The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 344:257-263 January 25, 2001 Number 4
NextNext

A Molecular Marker for Chloroquine-Resistant Falciparum Malaria
Abdoulaye Djimde, Pharm.D., Ogobara K. Doumbo, M.D., Ph.D., Joseph F. Cortese, B.S., Kassoum Kayentao, M.D., Safi Doumbo, M.D., Yacouba Diourte, Pharm.D., Alassane Dicko, M.D., Xin-zhuan Su, Ph.D., Takashi Nomura, M.D., Ph.D., David A. Fidock, Ph.D., Thomas E. Wellems, M.D., Ph.D., and Christopher V. Plowe, M.D., M.P.H.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Warhurst, D. C.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria is a major health problem, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Chloroquine resistance has been associated in vitro with point mutations in two genes, pfcrt and pfmdr 1, which encode the P. falciparum digestive-vacuole transmembrane proteins PfCRT and Pgh1, respectively.

Methods To assess the value of these mutations as markers for clinical chloroquine resistance, we measured the association between the mutations and the response to chloroquine treatment in patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Mali. The frequencies of the mutations in patients before and after treatment were compared for evidence of selection of resistance factors as a result of exposure to chloroquine.

Results The pfcrt mutation resulting in the substitution of threonine (T76) for lysine at position 76 was present in all 60 samples from patients with chloroquine-resistant infections (those that persisted or recurred after treatment), as compared with a base-line prevalence of 41 percent in samples obtained before treatment from 116 randomly selected patients (P< 0.001), indicating absolute selection for this mutation. The pfmdr 1 mutation resulting in the substitution of tyrosine (Y86) for asparagine at position 86 was also selected for, since it was present in 48 of 56 post-treatment samples from patients with chloroquine-resistant infections (86 percent), as compared with a base-line prevalence of 50 percent in 115 samples obtained before treatment (P<0.001). The presence of pfcrt T76 was more strongly associated with the development of chloroquine resistance (odds ratio, 18.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 6.5 to 58.3) than was the presence of pfmdr 1 Y86 (odds ratio, 3.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 6.8) or the presence of both mutations (odds ratio, 9.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.4 to 22.1).

Conclusions This study shows an association between the pfcrt T76 mutation in P. falciparum and the development of chloroquine resistance during the treatment of malaria. This mutation can be used as a marker in surveillance for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria.


Falciparum malaria remains a major cause of disease and death among children and pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. During the second half of the 20th century, chloroquine was the antimalarial treatment of choice, because it was safe, inexpensive, and highly effective against susceptible malaria parasites. Chloroquine resistance arose more than 40 years ago in Southeast Asia and South America, and in these regions chloroquine has now been largely abandoned as a treatment for falciparum malaria. Increasing rates of chloroquine resistance contribute to the rising morbidity and mortality from malaria in Africa.1,2 Given the lack of affordable alternatives, chloroquine remains the first-line antimalarial agent in most African countries.

Chloroquine acts by interfering with heme metabolism in the digestive vacuole of Plasmodium falciparum. In resistant parasites, the accumulation of chloroquine inside the vacuole is diminished.3,4,5,6,7 Verapamil, which inhibits P-glycoprotein–mediated multidrug resistance (encoded by mdr) in mammalian tumor cells, partly reverses chloroquine resistance in malaria parasites grown in vitro.8 In P. falciparum, mdr homologues encoding P-glycoprotein–like molecules have been proposed as determinants of chloroquine resistance, and associations have been reported between chloroquine resistance and amplification or mutation of the mdr-like gene pfmdr 1, which encodes Pgh1.9,10,11 However, the chloroquine-resistance phenotype was dissociated from inheritance of the pfmdr 1 gene in genetic studies.12 Some field studies have found an association between pfmdr 1 mutations and chloroquine resistance13 and others have not.14,15,16,17 In recent transformation experiments, chloroquine-sensitive P. falciparum parasites that acquire pfmdr 1 mutations did not become resistant to chloroquine.18

The locus governing chloroquine resistance in a P. falciparum genetic cross has been mapped to a 36-kb segment of chromosome 7. Polymorphisms in one gene, cg2, were highly associated with chloroquine resistance,19,20,21 but allelic modification experiments have ruled out a role for this gene in chloroquine resistance.22

Recently pfcrt, a gene with 13 exons, was identified near cg2 on chromosome 7.23 This gene encodes PfCRT, a transmembrane protein in the digestive vacuoles of malaria parasites. Sets of point mutations in pfcrt were associated with chloroquine resistance in vitro in laboratory lines of P. falciparum from Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia. One mutation, the substitution of threonine (T76) for lysine (K76) at position 76 (K76T), was present in all resistant isolates and absent from all sensitive isolates tested in vitro. Furthermore, genetic-transformation experiments with plasmids expressing mutant forms of pfcrt conferred chloroquine resistance on three different chloroquine-sensitive clones. These studies point to a key role for the pfcrt T76 mutation in conferring in vitro chloroquine resistance. The role of these mutations in the failure of chloroquine treatment has not been evaluated in clinical settings.

We conducted haplotype analyses of chloroquine-sensitive and chloroquine-resistant parasites from a drug-efficacy trial in Mali, assessing the relation between chloroquine resistance and mutations in pfcrt and pfmdr 1 in parasites from patients with falciparum malaria.

Methods

Measurement of Chloroquine Efficacy

The study was approved by institutional review boards at the University of Mali, Bamako; the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland; and the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Subjects were enrolled from August through December 1997 in Mopti (population, 60,000) and Bandiagara (population, 12,000) in central Mali, areas where P. falciparum is endemic, with intense seasonal peaks.24 Eligible patients were at least two years of age, had a positive blood smear for asexual forms of P. falciparum, and were seeking treatment for symptoms consistent with the presence of malaria (fever, chills, headache, and aches). Patients were excluded if they were allergic to chloroquine, had a concurrent nonmalarial febrile illness, had severe malnutrition or another chronic illness, or had severe malaria, defined by the presence of coma, obtundation, seizures, prostration, respiratory distress, shock, protracted vomiting, severe parasitemia (more than 105 parasites per cubic millimeter), a hematocrit of less than 15 percent, or a serum glucose level of less than 40 mg per deciliter (2.2 mmol per liter).

Chloroquine phosphate was administered orally at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight per day for two days, followed by a dose of 5 mg per kilogram on day 3. The patients were observed after each dose, and they were given another full dose if they vomited within 30 minutes and a half dose if they vomited within 31 minutes to 1 hour. Clinical follow-up occurred on days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14 after treatment, with microscopical examination of blood on days 3, 7, and 14 and whenever symptoms were reported or fever (defined as an axillary temperature of at least 37.5°C) was detected.

The outcome of treatment was assessed with the use of classic parasitologic definitions of resistance and sensitivity.25 Class III resistance was defined as persistent parasitemia with no reduction in the level of parasitemia or with a reduction to 25 percent or more of the initial (pretreatment) level by the third day after treatment. Class II resistance was defined as persistent parasitemia with reduction to less than 25 percent of the initial level by day 3. Class I resistance was defined as the initial clearance of parasites, with recurrence of parasitemia by day 14. An organism was considered to be sensitive to chloroquine if there was clearance of parasites, with no recurrence of parasitemia by day 14.

Molecular Analysis

After DNA had been extracted from dried filter papers that had been soaked in blood obtained from patients before and after treatment, nested mutation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or nested PCR followed by mutation-specific restriction-endonuclease digestion was used to detect mutations in pfcrt and pfmdr 1. Repeat polymorphisms in the {kappa} region and the {Omega} region of cg2 were detected by agarose-gel electrophoresis on the basis of the size of amplified products. The samples were analyzed for the following substitutions and polymorphisms: T76, the substitution of serine (S220) for alanine at position 220 (A220S), the substitution of glutamic acid (E271) for glutamine at position 271 (Q271E), the substitution of serine (S326) for asparagine at position 326 (N326S), the substitution of threonine (T356) for isoleucine at position 356 (I356T), and the substitution of isoleucine (I371) for arginine at position 371 (R371I) in pfcrt ; the substitution of tyrosine (Y86) for asparagine at position 86 (N86Y), the substitution of tyrosine (Y184) for phenylalanine at position 184 (F184Y), the substitution of cysteine (C1034) for serine at position 1034 (S1034C), the substitution of asparagine (N1042) for aspartic acid at position 1042 (D1042N), and the substitution of tyrosine (Y1246) for aspartic acid at position 1246 (D1246Y) in pfmdr 1; and size polymorphisms in the cg2 {kappa} and cg2 {Omega} repeats. Direct DNA sequencing was used to detect mutations for which these assays were not available and to confirm results. Microsatellite analysis26,27,28 was performed to determine whether there was genetic similarity among chloroquine-sensitive parasites and among chloroquine-resistant parasites with the use of primers and methods described elsewhere.29 Detailed information on these techniques is available on the Internet at http://medschool.umaryland.edu/CVD/plowe.html.

Statistical Analysis

We analyzed samples taken before and after treatment for all patients with chloroquine-resistant infections. Base-line frequencies of mutations were determined from samples taken before treatment that were selected randomly and analyzed without knowledge of the clinical outcome. All samples with class I, II, or III resistance were grouped for analysis. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for two-tailed significance (P=0.05) was used for univariate comparisons. Multiple logistic-regression analysis was performed with the use of a software program (Stata, College Station, Tex.).

Results

Of the 514 patients who were enrolled, 469 completed follow-up and had an outcome that could be evaluated. The infection was sensitive to chloroquine in 86 percent of the infections, resistant at the class I level in 11 percent, resistant at the class II level in 2 percent, and resistant at the class III level in 1 percent. The median age of the patients was 10 years. The median parasite density was 12,800 per cubic millimeter.

Prevalence of pfcrt T76 and pfmdr 1 Mutations

The prevalence of pfcrt T76 and pfmdr 1 Y86 was compared in parasites from randomly selected patients before treatment and in parasites from patients whose infections persisted or recurred 4 to 14 days after treatment. Table 1 shows that these mutations, as well as cg2 polymorphisms, were more prevalent in samples obtained from patients with a post-treatment infection. Other previously described pfmdr 1 mutations (F184Y, S1034C, D1042N, and D1246Y) either were not detected or were not more common in samples from patients with a post-treatment infection (data not shown).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Prevalence of Mutations in Samples Obtained from Patients before Chloroquine Treatment and from Patients with Persistent or Recurrent Infection after Treatment.

 
The pfcrt T76 mutation was present in all 60 samples from patients with a post-treatment infection that were analyzed for this mutation (Figure 1). In contrast, 14 percent of the 56 samples analyzed from patients with post-treatment infections carried only the wild-type allele at position 86 of pfmdr 1 (N86) and 16 percent carried a mixture of the wild-type and the mutant allele.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Prevalence of Alleles with the pfcrt T76, cg2 {kappa}, cg2 {Omega}, or pfmdr 1 Mutations Associated with Resistance to Chloroquine, Wild-Type Alleles Associated with Sensitivity to Chloroquine, or Both in Samples from Patients with a Persistent or Recurrent Infection after Chloroquine Treatment.

The complete absence of parasites with the wild-type Y76 allele for pfcrt at position 76 after chloroquine treatment indicates selection for the T76 mutation in vivo.

 
We performed microsatellite analysis in 8 samples from patients with chloroquine-sensitive infections in which the parasites had the K76 pfcrt allele and in 22 samples from patients with chloroquine-resistant infections in which the parasites had the T76 mutant allele. This analysis (data not shown) confirmed the diversity of the genetic backgrounds of P. falciparum parasites in all infections, and there was no evidence that a clone or strain of parasite was responsible for either sensitive or resistant infections.

Prevalence of Other pfcrt Mutations in Association with T76

Seven other pfcrt mutations have been identified in association with T76 in parasites from Africa and Asia: I74, E75, S220, E271, S236, T356, and I371.23 In randomly selected samples obtained from patients before treatment and patients with post-treatment infections, all but the T356 mutation were significantly selected for in vivo by chloroquine treatment (Table 1). This result is consistent with the lack of association of T356 with in vitro chloroquine resistance.23

In most pretreatment infections with chloroquine-sensitive parasites that had the K76 pfcrt allele, which is associated with sensitivity to chloroquine, the parasite also carried wild-type pfcrt alleles at other positions that are associated with sensitivity type at A220 (30 of 31 samples), Q271 (35 of 35), N326 (29 of 34), I356 (35 of 36), and R371 (27 of 29).23 Among parasites with the T76 mutation, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of pfcrt I74, E75, S220, E271, S326, T356, or I371 mutations in the infections that cleared after chloroquine treatment and those that did not clear after chloroquine treatment. In all parasites tested for their presence, the pfcrt mutations I74, E75, S220, and I371 accompanied T76.

Association between pfcrt and pfmdr 1 Mutations and Treatment Outcome

To determine whether the presence of pfcrt and pfmdr 1 mutations at the time of treatment was associated with subsequent treatment failure, we compared the prevalence of these mutations in infections that failed to clear and in infections that cleared with chloroquine treatment. The mutations pfcrt T76 and pfmdr 1 Y86, as well as the polymorphisms in cg2 {kappa} and cg2 {Omega} repeats that are associated with resistance, were all associated with in vivo chloroquine resistance in univariate analyses. Overall, parasites carrying pfcrt T76 were the most likely to be resistant to chloroquine treatment (odds ratio, 18.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 6.5 to 58.3). The additional presence of pfmdr 1 Y86 and of polymorphisms in cg2 that are associated with resistance did not strengthen the association between pfcrt T76 and in vivo resistance. Adjustment for age showed in almost all cases that the strongest associations between genotypes and resistant infections were found in children younger than 10 years of age, which was the median age of the patients (Table 2).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Univariate Analysis of the Association between the Presence of Various Mutations before Treatment and the Likelihood of Clinical Chloroquine Resistance, According to Age.

 
Multiple logistic-regression analysis confirmed that pfcrt T76 (odds ratio for resistance, 16.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 5.7 to 45.7) and pfmdr 1 Y86 (odds ratio, 2.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 5.8) were independently associated with an increased likelihood of resistance, although there was no interaction between these two mutations. The cg2 polymorphisms were not associated with outcome independently of pfcrt T76. Increasing age was confirmed to be protective against resistance, whereas the presence or absence of fever and the level of parasitemia were not significantly associated with outcome.

Effect of Age on the Association between Mutations and Outcome

The base-line prevalence of pfcrt T76 was higher than that of clinical chloroquine resistance: 41 percent of the parasites obtained from 116 randomly selected patients before treatment had T76, whereas the parasites from only 14 percent of 469 patients exhibited in vivo resistance. Partial immunity develops with prolonged exposure to malaria, and older persons in endemic areas have protection against the disease.30 To determine whether immunity contributed to the ability to clear infections by parasites carrying pfcrt T76, we compared the proportion of infections by parasites carrying T76 that cleared in children younger than 10 years with the proportion of infections by parasites carrying T76 that cleared in older children and adults. In the younger group, 68 percent of 73 pretreatment infections by parasites with the T76 mutation failed to clear, whereas in older patients, only 34 percent of 35 pretreatment infections with the T76 mutation failed to clear (P< 0.001).

Discussion

The T76 mutation in pfcrt, which encodes a transporter protein of the P. falciparum digestive vacuole, was found in 60 samples from patients with falciparum malaria infections that recurred or persisted after treatment with oral chloroquine, indicating the absolute selection for this mutation in parasites capable of surviving in the presence of chloroquine. Parasites harboring pfcrt K76, which is associated with chloroquine sensitivity in vitro,23 were not detected in any of these post-treatment infections. In contrast to the total absence of pfcrt K76, pfmdr 1 N86, the form associated with sensitivity, was detected in parasites from 30 percent of patients whose infections persisted or recurred after chloroquine treatment. The presence of PfCRT T76 at the time of treatment was also strongly associated with subsequent resistance to chloroquine in vivo. These data, combined with the genetic evidence of Fidock et al.,22,23 support the idea that pfcrt is an essential determinant of chloroquine resistance in clinical falciparum malaria.

Chloroquine therapy cleared some infections by parasites carrying pfcrt T76. This result is consistent with those of previous field studies in which in vitro drug resistance was more common than in vivo resistance.31,32,33 The association we observed between age and successful treatment reflects the gradual acquisition of partial immunity in this highly endemic area, and this immunity helps in the clearance of resistant parasites.

In some infections that were resistant to chloroquine treatment, pfcrt T76 was not detected at the time of treatment but was detected in the parasites that survived treatment. Although this result could have been due to reinfection or to the failure to achieve adequate chloroquine levels in blood, reinfection should be rare during a 14-day follow-up period, and subtherapeutic chloroquine levels owing to poor compliance are unlikely with directly observed therapy. A more likely explanation is that these were mixed infections consisting predominantly of sensitive parasites along with minute populations of resistant parasites whose levels were below the threshold of detection by PCR or restriction-endonuclease methods. During exposure to chloroquine, sensitive parasites would have been cleared as the resistant parasite population expanded, resulting in treatment failure.

All parasites with the pfcrt T76 mutation also had the pfcrt I74, E75, S220, and I371 mutations. The presence of several of these mutations may be required to maintain native PfCRT function and at the same time confer chloroquine resistance. Simultaneous acquisition of several mutations by a single PfCRT molecule would be an extremely rare event. This may explain the slow rate of emergence and contiguous pattern of the geographic spread of chloroquine resistance in South America and Southeast Asia34 and the different sets of pfcrt mutations found in chloroquine-resistant isolates from these regions.23 Among chloroquine-sensitive parasites without the T76 mutation, some had the S220, S236, T356, or I371 mutation or more than one of these mutations. This result is consistent with the finding of Fidock et al. that some chloroquine-sensitive clones do not have the T76 mutation but do have other pfcrt mutations,23 and it further supports the idea that T76 has an essential role in chloroquine resistance.

Our finding of a significant association between cg2 polymorphisms and chloroquine resistance is consistent with the findings of others,20,21 but in the light of recent genetic-transformation studies,22 this result is almost certainly due to the proximity of cg2 and pfcrt on chromosome 7 and not to any causal role of cg2 in chloroquine resistance.

We found that the pfmdr 1 mutation Y86 was significantly selected for by chloroquine treatment, as previously reported.13 Because pfmdr 1 and PfCRT are on different chromosomes, their coselection cannot be attributed to physical linkage. Rather, pfmdr 1 Y86 may confer some advantage to the parasite in the presence of chloroquine, either by compensating for fitness lost because of pfcrt mutations or by augmenting the level of resistance.

Our study does not support the idea that pfmdr 1 has a primary role in conferring chloroquine resistance in P. falciparum. This result is consistent with those of previous studies, which reported the absence of an association between the presence of other pfmdr 1 mutations and chloroquine resistance in vivo14,15,16,17 and showed that resistant infections in vivo can be due to parasites with no pfmdr 1 mutations at position 86.14,19,35 Although there is some evidence that pfmdr 1 may modulate the level of in vitro resistance,18 the presence of pfmdr 1 Y86 in parasites obtained from patients before treatment did not strengthen the association between pfcrt T76 and treatment failure. Since these two mutations could affect each other only if they occurred in the same parasite, these data do not rule out the possibility that pfmdr 1 modulates chloroquine resistance in areas where polyclonal infections are common. However, because most parasites in our study had only mutant forms of both pfcrt and pfmdr 1, any strong interaction should have been detected. It is possible that any additive or epistatic effects of pfmdr 1 Y86 or other genetic factors on chloroquine resistance would be more apparent in areas where the level of immunity, the prevalence of chloroquine resistance, or the genetic complexity of infections is different.

Molecular assays for detecting pfcrt mutations are potentially important tools for identifying chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum malaria. Our results suggest that pfcrt T76 will be most predictive of clinical chloroquine resistance in nonimmune populations, such as travelers or residents of areas with low or unstable rates of malaria transmission. In areas such as our study site, where the prevalence of pfcrt T76 exceeds that of clinical resistance, indicating low specificity of pfcrt T76 as a clinical test, determining the ratio of the prevalence of T76 mutations to the prevalence of chloroquine resistance may permit the prediction of clinical resistance rates. Surveys to determine the prevalence of pfcrt T76 will be useful not only in areas that still rely on chloroquine, but also in regions where the failure rates of drugs that replaced chloroquine are now increasing. The finding of a decreasing prevalence of pfcrt mutations in these areas would provide a rationale for considering the reintroduction of chloroquine, ideally in combination with other antimalarial drugs, so as to prevent the reemergence of resistance.36 A better understanding of the specific host factors that contribute to the clearance of parasites with resistance-conferring pfcrt mutations will be needed in order to improve the ability of molecular markers to predict in vivo resistance in semi-immune populations.

Supported by a contract (N01-AI-85346) with and a grant (5P50AI39469) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH); by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) through its Health and Human Resources Analysis for Africa Program; by direct support from the USAID Mission, Bamako, Mali, for the development of the Malaria Research and Training Center; by a grant (980152) from the United Nations Development Program, World Bank, World Health Organization Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases/Multilateral Initiative on Malaria; and by the Department of Technical Co-operation of the Energy Agency. Dr. Djimdé is supported by an NIH Research Fellowship and a Research Training Grant from the United Nations Development Program, World Bank, World Health Organization Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases.

We are indebted to Chiaka Diakité, Robert Gwadz, Richard Sakai, Akouni Dougnon, Ibrahim Ouologuem, Idrissa Cissé, Dramane Coulibaly, Sekou Touré, and Fabian Mendez; to the directors of the Bandiagara and Mopti Health Centers and the Mopti Regional Malaria Control Program; and to the Bandiagara Traditional Healers Association.


Source Information

From the Malaria Section, Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (A. Djimdé, J.F.C., A. Dicko, C.V.P.); the Malaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dentistry, University of Mali, Bamako, Mali (A. Djimdé, O.K.D., K.K., S.D., Y.D., A. Dicko); and the Malaria Genetics Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md. (A. Djimdé, A. Dicko, X.S., T.N., D.A.F., T.E.W.). Drissa Coulibaly, M.D., Malaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dentistry, University of Mali, Bamako, Mali, was also an author.Yacouba Diourte, Pharm.D., is deceased.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Plowe at the Malaria Section, Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 685 W. Baltimore St., HSF 480, Baltimore, MD 21201, or at cplowe{at}medicine.umaryland.edu.

References

  1. Marsh K. Malaria disaster in Africa. Lancet 1998;352:924-924. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Trape JF, Pison MP, Preziosi MP, et al. Impact of chloroquine resistance on malaria mortality. C R Acad Sci III 1998;321:689-697. [Medline]
  3. Fitch CD. Plasmodium falciparum in owl monkeys: drug resistance and chloroquine binding capacity. Science 1970;169:289-290. [Free Full Text]
  4. Yayon A, Cabantchik ZI, Ginsburg H. Identification of the acidic compartment of Plasmodium falciparum-infected human erythrocytes as the target of the antimalarial drug chloroquine. EMBO J 1984;3:2695-2700. [Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Krogstad DJ, Schlesinger PH, Gluzman IY. Antimalarials increase vesicle pH in Plasmodium falciparum. J Cell Biol 1985;101:2302-2309. [Free Full Text]
  6. Sullivan DJ Jr, Gluzman IY, Russell DG, Goldberg DE. On the molecular mechanism of chloroquine's antimalarial action. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:11865-11870. [Free Full Text]
  7. Bray PG, Mungthin M, Ridley RG, Ward SA. Access to hematin: the basis of chloroquine resistance. Mol Pharmacol 1998;54:170-179. [Free Full Text]
  8. Martin SK, Oduola AM, Milhous WK. Reversal of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum by verapamil. Science 1987;235:899-901. [Free Full Text]
  9. Foote SJ, Thompson JK, Cowman AF, Kemp DJ. Amplification of the multidrug resistance gene in some chloroquine-resistant isolates of P. falciparum. Cell 1989;57:921-930. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Wilson CM, Serrano AE, Wasley A, Bogenschutz MP, Shankar AH, Wirth DF. Amplification of a gene related to mammalian mdr genes in drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Science 1989;244:1184-1186. [Free Full Text]
  11. Foote SJ, Kyle DE, Martin RK, et al. Several alleles of the multidrug-resistance gene are closely linked to chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 1990;345:255-258. [CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Wellems TE, Panton LJ, Gluzman IY, et al. Chloroquine resistance not linked to mdr-like genes in a Plasmodium falciparum cross. Nature 1990;345:253-255. [CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Duraisingh MT, Drakeley CJ, Muller O, et al. Evidence for selection for the tyrosine-86 allele of the pfmdr 1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum by chloroquine and amodiaquine. Parasitology 1997;114:205-211.
  14. Basco LK, Ringwald P. Molecular epidemiology of malaria in Yaounde, Cameroon. III. Analysis of chloroquine resistance and point mutations in the multidrug resistance 1 (pfmdr 1) gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998;59:577-581. [Abstract]
  15. Bhattacharya PR, Biswas S, Kabilan L. Alleles of the Plasmodium falciparum Pfmdr1 gene appear not to be associated with chloroquine resistance in India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1997;91:454-455. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. McCutcheon KR, Freese JA, Frean JA, Sharp BL, Markus MB. Two mutations in the multidrug-resistance gene homologue of Plasmodium falciparum, pfmdr1, are not useful predictors of in-vivo or in-vitro chloroquine resistance in southern Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1999;93:300-302. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Povoa MM, Adagu IS, Oliveira SG, Machado RLD, Miles MA, Warhurst DC. Pfmdr 1 Asn1042Asp and Asp1246Tyr polymorphisms, thought to be associated with chloroquine resistance, are present in chloroquine-resistant and -sensitive Brazilian field isolates of Plasmodium falciparum. Exp Parasitol 1998;88:64-68. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Reed MB, Saliba KJ, Caruana SR, Kirk K, Cowman AF. Pgh1 modulates sensitivity and resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 2000;403:906-909. [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Su X, Kirkman LA, Fujioka H, Wellems TE. Complex polymorphisms in an ~330 kDa protein are linked to chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum in Southeast Asia and Africa. Cell 1997;91:593-603. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Basco LK, Ringwald P. Molecular epidemiology of malaria in Yaounde, Cameroon. V. Analysis of the omega repetitive region of the Plasmodium falciparum CG2 gene and chloroquine resistance. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999;61:807-813. [Abstract]
  21. Adagu IS, Warhurst DC. Association of cg2 and pfmdr1 genotype with chloroquine resistance in field samples of Plasmodium falciparum from Nigeria. Parasitology 1999;119:343-348.
  22. Fidock DA, Nomura T, Cooper RA, Su X, Talley AK, Wellems TE. Allelic modifications of cg2 and cg1 genes do not alter the chloroquine response of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2000;110:1-10. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Fidock DA, Nomura T, Talley AK, et al. Mutations in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol Cell 2000;6:861-871. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Plowe CV, Djimde A, Wellems TE, Diop S, Kouriba B, Doumbo OK. Community pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine use and prevalence of resistant Plasmodium falciparum genotypes in Mali: a model for deterring resistance. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1996;55:467-471.
  25. Division of Control of Tropical Diseases. Assessment of therapeutic efficacy of antimalarial drugs for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in areas with intense transmission. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996.
  26. Su XZ, Wellems TE. Toward a high-resolution Plasmodium falciparum linkage map: polymorphic markers from hundreds of simple sequence repeats. Genomics 1996;33:430-444. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Anderson TJ, Su XZ, Bockarie M, Lagog M, Day KP. Twelve microsatellite markers for characterization of Plasmodium falciparum from finger-prick blood samples. Parasitology 1999;119:113-125.
  28. Su X, Ferdig MT, Huang Y, et al. A genetic map and recombination parameters of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Science 1999;286:1351-1353. [Free Full Text]
  29. Doumbo OK, Kayentao K, Djimdé A, et al. Rapid selection of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase mutants by pyrimethamine prophylaxis. J Infect Dis 2000;182:993-996. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Marsh K. Malaria -- a neglected disease? Parasitology 1992;104:Suppl:S53-S69.
  31. Baird JK, Basri H, Jones TR, Purnomo, Bangs MJ, Ritonga A. Resistance to antimalarials by Plasmodium falciparum in Arso PIR, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1991;44:640-644.
  32. Bickii J, Basco LK, Ringwald P. Assessment of three in vitro tests and an in vivo test for chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:243-247. [Free Full Text]
  33. Basco LK, Ringwald P. Molecular epidemiology of malaria in Yaounde, Cameroon. II. Baseline frequency of point mutations in the dihydropteroate synthase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998;58:374-377. [Abstract]
  34. Peters W. Drug resistance in malaria. Recenti Prog Med 1990;81:749-753. [Medline]
  35. von Seidlein L, Duraisingh MT, Drakeley CJ, Bailey R, Greenwood BM, Pinder M. Polymorphism of the Pfmdr1 gene and chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in the Gambia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1997;91:450-453. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. White NJ, Nosten F, Looareesuwan S, et al. Averting a malaria disaster. Lancet 1999;353:1965-1967. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Warhurst, D. C.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.