The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 345:1223-1229 October 25, 2001 Number 17
NextNext

Reversal of Catabolism by Beta-Blockade after Severe Burns
David N. Herndon, M.D., David W. Hart, M.D., Steven E. Wolf, M.D., David L. Chinkes, Ph.D., and Robert R. Wolfe, Ph.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Sheridan, R. L.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The catecholamine-mediated hypermetabolic response to severe burns causes increased energy expenditure and muscle-protein catabolism. We hypothesized that blockade of {beta}-adrenergic stimulation with propranolol would decrease resting energy expenditure and muscle catabolism in patients with severe burns.

Methods Twenty-five children with acute and severe burns (more than 40 percent of total body-surface area) were studied in a randomized trial. Thirteen received oral propranolol for at least two weeks, and 12 served as untreated controls. The dose of propranolol was adjusted to decrease the resting heart rate by 20 percent from each patient's base-line value. Resting energy expenditure and skeletal-muscle protein kinetics were measured before and after two weeks of beta-blockade (or no therapy, in controls). Body composition was measured serially throughout hospitalization.

Results Patients in the control group and the propranolol group were similar with respect to age, weight, percentage of total body-surface area burned, percentage of body-surface area with third-degree burns, and length of time from injury to metabolic study. Beta-blockade decreased the heart rates and resting energy expenditure in the propranolol group, both as compared with the base-line values (P<0.001 and P=0.01, respectively) and as compared with the values in the control group (P=0.03 and P=0.001, respectively). The net muscle-protein balance increased by 82 percent over base-line values in the propranolol group (P=0.002), whereas it decreased by 27 percent in the control group (P not significant). The fat-free mass, as measured by whole-body potassium scanning, did not change substantially in the propranolol group, whereas it decreased by a mean (±SE) of 9±2 percent in the control group (P=0.003).

Conclusions In children with burns, treatment with propranolol during hospitalization attenuates hypermetabolism and reverses muscle-protein catabolism.


The hypermetabolic response to severe burns is associated with increased energy expenditure and the release of substrate from protein and fat stores. After severe trauma, the rate of protein catabolism is increased, leading to the loss of lean body mass and muscle wasting.1,2 Muscle proteolysis continues for at least nine months after severe burns,3 thus increasing the likelihood of delays in rehabilitation, other complications, and death.4

Endogenous catecholamines are primary mediators of the hypermetabolic response to trauma or burns.5,6 Shortly after severe trauma or burns, plasma catecholamine levels increase as much as 10-fold.7,8 This systemic response to injury is characterized by the development of a hyperdynamic circulation9 and an increase in basal energy expenditure10 and catabolism of skeletal-muscle protein.3,11 Blockade of {beta}-adrenergic stimulation after severe burns decreases supraphysiologic thermogenesis,12 tachycardia,13 cardiac work,14 and resting energy expenditure.15 Decreased rates of cardiac complications and overall mortality have been documented in patients without trauma who are given beta-blockers for the control of tachycardia after major surgical procedures.16 After burns, the elevations in basal energy expenditure and muscle-protein catabolism have been found to be correlated.17 Because beta-blockade decreases energy expenditure after burns,6,13 we hypothesized that long-term beta-blockade with propranolol would decrease the rate of muscle-protein catabolism as well.

Methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Texas Medical Branch, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient's parent or guardian. Children could be enrolled if they were less than 18 years of age, had burns on more than 40 percent of their total body-surface area, and had been transferred to our hospital within one week after injury. Patients with a history of asthma were excluded.

Within 48 hours after admission, each patient underwent burn-wound excision and grafting with skin autografts and allografts. The patients returned to the operating room in 6 to 10 days, when the autograft sites had healed. Sequential staged grafting procedures were performed until the wounds were closed.

The patients were fed a commercial enteral formula (Vivonex T.E.N., Sandoz Nutritional, Minneapolis) through a nasoduodenal tube. The daily caloric intake was calculated to deliver 1500 kcal per square meter of body-surface area burned plus another 1500 kcal per square meter of total body-surface area. Enteral nutrition was started at admission and continued until the wounds healed. The patients remained in bed for five days after excision and grafting procedures, after which they were allowed to walk daily until the next excision-and-grafting procedure.

Study Design

From January through December 1999, 25 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. Thirteen received propranolol, and 12 served as untreated controls. Randomization was performed with use of a random-number–generating scheme.

On the fifth day after the first surgical procedure, all patients underwent metabolic examination. Resting energy expenditure and net protein balance across one of the patient's legs (randomly determined) were the main outcome variables. In addition, all patients underwent whole-body potassium scanning at base line to determine the fat-free mass. Immediately after the next operation, the patients in the propranolol group began to receive propranolol by nasogastric tube at a dose of 0.33 mg per kilogram of body weight every four hours (total dose, 1.98 mg per kilogram per day). This dose was adjusted to achieve a 20 percent decrease in the heart rate of each patient, as compared with the 24-hour average heart rate immediately before drug treatment. Heart rate and blood pressure were monitored continuously throughout the study. When the mean blood pressure fell below 65 mm Hg, the dose of propranolol was withheld or decreased. The dose was then increased incrementally to meet the study goal of a decrease in heart rate by 20 percent from established base-line levels as tolerated. Propranolol was given as scheduled during surgical procedures.

Two weeks after treatment was started, a second series of metabolic and protein-kinetics studies was performed. Patients who had received at least a four-week treatment course underwent a second measurement of whole-body potassium. At discharge, the patients underwent body-composition scanning with use of dual-image x-ray absorptiometry.

Measurement of Vital Signs

Temperature, heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured hourly with use of a standard bladder-temperature monitor, electrocardiographic monitor, and arterial catheter, respectively. The average for each 24-hour period was determined. The heart rate was compared between groups for the duration of the study. Other analyses of changes with treatment were made between groups with data gathered on the day of the stable-isotope study.

Measurement of Serum Glucose, Potassium, and Hormone Values

Serum levels of glucose and potassium were determined (Stat-5 analyzer, Novel Biomedical, Waltham, Mass.) on the morning of the stable-isotope studies. On the same morning, serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I were determined by ethanol extraction, and serum levels of growth hormone, cortisol, and insulin were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or enzyme immunoassay (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, Tex.).

Determination of Infections and Energy Expenditure

Infection was defined throughout hospitalization by the presence of burn sepsis, which we have previously described.17 Between midnight and 5 a.m. on the day of the stable-isotope study, oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, the respiratory quotient, and the resting energy expenditure were determined with use of a metabolic cart (model 2900, Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, Calif.) at an ambient temperature of 30°C during continuous feeding.

Kinetics Study

On the fifth day after the first and third operations, all patients underwent a five-hour protein-kinetics study, as previously described,18 while receiving a continuous feeding. Briefly, an infusion of L-[ring-2H5]phenylalanine (Cambridge Isotopes, Andover, Mass.) was given intravenously for five hours: the initial, or priming, dose was 2 µmol per kilogram and was followed by a dose of 0.08 µmol per kilogram per minute. Biopsy of the vastus lateralis muscle of the study leg was performed two and five hours after the commencement of the infusion. To determine blood flow in the leg, indocyanine green was infused into the femoral artery. Cross-leg amino-acid kinetics were calculated according to a three-compartment model described by Biolo et al.18

The blood levels of unlabeled phenylalanine and its isotopic counterpart were simultaneously determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with the use of the internal-standard approach and N-methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide, as previously described.19 Levels of indocyanine green were determined spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 805 nm (Spectronic 1001, Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, N.Y.).

Muscle samples were stored at –70°C. Each sample was weighed, and protein was precipitated out with 5 percent perchloric acid solution. An internal standard containing 5.9 µmol of L-[ring-13C6]phenylalanine per liter was added and thoroughly mixed. The level of bound-protein precipitate was determined by comparison with a set of isotopically labeled phenylalanine dilution-calibration standards, with correction for the various weights of the labeled compounds.18

We calculated the fractional rate of synthesis of skeletal-muscle protein by determining the rate of incorporation of labeled phenylalanine into protein and then measuring the level of bound protein in the intracellular pool, as previously described.19

Determination of Body Composition

The fat-free mass was determined by whole-body potassium-40 scintillation counting in a heavily shielded counting room with a low level of background noise, a 32NaI detector array, and a computed data-analysis method that has been validated for use in children.20,21 The counting precision of the instrument used is within less than 1.5 percent, and it was calibrated daily by using a bottle-manikin absorption phantom (Canberra Industries, Meriden, Conn.) with simulated fat overlays. Feeding and intravenous fluids were discontinued during the studies to minimize exogenous potassium contamination.

The total-body lean mass and fat mass were measured with use of a dual-image x-ray absorptiometer (model QDR-4500W, Hologic, Waltham, Mass.) with a pediatric software package. This system has a minimal mean error rate with respect to the measurement of fat-free mass in children.22 To minimize systematic deviations, the system was calibrated daily against a spinal phantom (Hologic) in the anteroposterior, lateral, and single-beam modes for quality control of the measurements.

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ±SE. The distribution of the data was normal, and the degree of variation within individual subjects was similar. We did not control for differences between the groups in sex, age, or weight. Two-sided paired t-tests were used to compare data within groups. Comparisons between groups were made by unpaired t-tests. Fisher's exact test was used for frequency data. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

The characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. One of the 25 patients chose not to participate in the stable-isotope studies. Three patients (two in the control group and one in the propranolol group) were fully healed and discharged before receiving four weeks of treatment. These subjects did not undergo a second whole-body potassium-counting study.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the Patients.

 
Propranolol decreased the heart rate by 20 percent as compared with both the patient's own base-line value (P<0.001) and the value in the control group (P=0.001) (Figure 1A). To achieve or maintain this decrease, the dose of propranolol was increased from the initial dose of 0.33 mg per kilogram given by nasogastric tube every four hours (total dose, 1.98 mg per kilogram per day) to an average dose of 1.05±0.15 mg per kilogram every four hours (total dose, 6.3 mg per kilogram per day) by the end of hospitalization. Blood-pressure (Figure 1B), temperature, and glucose values did not differ significantly between groups. None of the patients in either the control group or the propranolol group required mechanical ventilation except for brief periods perioperatively, and none had clinically significant pneumonia. The serum potassium values at two or four weeks were higher in the propranolol group (P=0.05) (Table 2).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean (±SE) Heart Rate (Panel A) and Mean (+SE) Arterial Pressure (Panel B) before and during Treatment in the Two Groups.

Heart rate and blood pressure were measured hourly. Panel A shows the average heart rate before treatment (day –1), at base line (day 0), and during four weeks of treatment. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P=0.001) by t-test between the two groups. Panel B shows the mean arterial pressure at base line and on the day of the stable-isotope study, after approximately two weeks of treatment. There were no significant changes in arterial pressure either within or between groups.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Changes in Various Values from Base Line.

 
At two weeks, resting energy expenditure and oxygen consumption had increased, with a minor decrease in carbon dioxide production, from base line in the control group. In contrast, patients in the propranolol group had significant decreases in these variables (Table 2). The respiratory quotient did not change significantly in either group (Table 2).

Concurrently with the decline in energy expenditure, beta-blockade also improved the kinetics of skeletal-muscle protein. Treatment with propranolol improved the net muscle-protein balance as compared with base-line values (P=0.002) and with values in the control group (P=0.001) (Figure 2). The remainder of the model-derived values for the studies comparing the propranolol group with the control group are listed in Table 3. In one of the studies in one patient, a steady state (in which the ratio of unlabeled to labeled phenylalanine was 1) was not reached, and thus this study was not included in the analysis. As a result of an increase in the efficiency of protein synthesis, there was an increase in protein synthesis, as measured by the rate of incorporation of the tracer into muscle over time, with long-term beta-blockade.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Mean (±SE) Change from Base Line in the Net Balance of Muscle-Protein Synthesis and Breakdown during Two Weeks of Treatment.

Values were obtained with use of a five-hour kinetic study that used isotopically labeled phenylalanine. The asterisk indicates a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.001 by t-test) and a significant difference between the base-line value and the value at two weeks (P=0.002 by paired t-test).

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Kinetics of Skeletal-Muscle Protein after Treatment.

 
Twenty-two patients underwent whole-body potassium scanning a second time to evaluate changes in body composition during this period. The 10 control patients lost approximately 9 percent of their fat-free mass, whereas the 12 patients in the propranolol group lost only 1 percent (P=0.003) (Figure 3). These results were independently confirmed by the results of dual-image x-ray absorptiometry, performed at the time of full healing and discharge from the hospital. Nine consecutive patients of the 25 enrolled in the study were not able to undergo dual-image x-ray absorptiometry because of technical difficulties with the scanner over a three-month period. The remaining seven patients in the control group had a lean body mass of 73.5±1.5 percent, whereas the nine patients in the propranolol group had a value of 79.1±1.2 percent, a difference of approximately 6 percentage points (P=0.01).


View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mean (±SE) Change from Base Line in Fat-free Mass during Four Weeks of Treatment.

Values were determined with use of whole-body potassium scanning at base line and after four weeks of treatment. There was a significant difference (P=0.003 by t-test) between the two groups.

 
No adverse clinical sequelae resulted from beta-blockade. One or more doses of propranolol were withheld temporarily in 3 of the 13 patients in the propranolol group who had a mean arterial pressure between 60 and 65 mm Hg. These periods of decreased blood pressure were not related to sepsis or surgical procedures. Clinical sepsis developed during hospitalization in 3 of 12 control patients and 4 of 13 patients in the propranolol group (P=1.0). No other direct or indirect evidence of tissue hypoperfusion (i.e., no conversion of intermediate-thickness wounds to full-thickness wounds and no metabolic acidosis) was found at any time among the patients in the propranolol group. No episodes of wheezing were noted in any patient in the propranolol group.

Discussion

During catabolism, muscle protein is degraded faster than it is synthesized, resulting in a negative net protein balance. We used stable-isotope methods and serial body-composition scanning to determine that beta-blockade with propranolol diminishes wasting of skeletal-muscle protein after severe burns. Thirteen severely burned children were given propranolol for up to four weeks and had a decrease in resting energy expenditure, without any adverse effects. Twelve of these patients had an improvement in net muscle-protein balance. Beta-blockade given over a period of weeks after severe burn led to an increase in lean body mass.

Catecholamines are the primary mediators of elevated energy expenditure after burns.5,6,15 Both direct5,6 and indirect15 calorimetry have been used to demonstrate that energy expenditure is decreased by beta-blockade after severe burns. Other studies have also demonstrated that urinary nitrogen losses23 and whole-body urea production24 are decreased by beta-blockade. Interestingly, {beta}-agonists have been shown to stimulate muscle-protein synthesis in unstressed animals,25,26 although the relevance of such animal models to the physiological state of critically ill patients is unclear.

The net balance of protein synthesis and breakdown achieved anabolic levels during treatment with propranolol. Propranolol has a greater anabolic effect on muscle than other agents that have been evaluated in burn victims by methods similar to ours.27,28,29

To corroborate the results of our stable-isotope measurements, we used two independent body-composition tests. Fat-free mass, which corresponds to the sum of lean mass and bone mass, was measured by whole-body potassium scanning before and after four weeks of treatment. In the propranolol group, fat-free mass was preserved (the change was statistically no different from zero). In comparison, 10 control patients lost 9 percent of their fat-free mass over this period. These results were confirmed by the results of dual-image x-ray absorptiometry, performed at the time of discharge in 16 patients.

Data derived from our stable-isotope studies provide insight into the physiological changes induced by beta-blockade at the tissue level. We found an acceleration in the rate of protein synthesis in the propranolol-treated patients. The post-traumatic increase in proteolysis is primarily the result of a large increase in protein degradation, which outweighs the increase in total protein synthesis.27,30,31 We found that propranolol induced an increase in the intracellular recycling of free amino acids. In the process of substrate reuse, free intracellular amino acids derived from stimulated protein breakdown were incorporated back into bound protein without leaving the myocyte.

Each of the methods we used to measure changes has limitations. For instance, we used labeled phenylalanine as the only tracer in the stable-isotope studies, assuming that since phenylalanine is neither synthesized nor degraded in the leg, any changes in the net balance reflect the total protein balance. This assumption has been verified in normal subjects but not in stressed, hypermetabolic subjects.32 Whole-body potassium scanning is based on the assumption that the ratios of potassium to nitrogen in skeletal muscle and nonskeletal muscle are constant. Wang et al. showed that this method may underestimate total lean body mass during conditions of muscle wasting.33 A limitation of dual-image x-ray absorptiometry is that it overestimates lean body mass in patients with edema. However, all three methods demonstrated significant improvements in lean body mass with propranolol treatment, despite the different assumptions and shortcomings of each method, thus supporting the conclusion that propranolol treatment improves the accretion of lean body mass in severely burned children.

Any pharmacotherapy carries risks. Given carelessly, propranolol could cause hypoperfusion as a result of decreased cardiac output, particularly in patients with sepsis. In patients with other conditions, it could induce severe bronchospasm.

We had a specific therapeutic goal of decreasing the heart rate by 20 percent, a decrease that we have previously shown to be safe.12,13,14 The patients underwent continuous hemodynamic and respiratory monitoring, and there were no complications related to therapy. We found no significant decrease in blood pressure with propranolol treatment at these doses. However, propranolol was withheld temporarily from 3 of the 13 patients at some time during therapy because of a low mean arterial pressure, which indicates that patients receiving this treatment should be closely monitored. We have previously shown that propranolol treatment does not reduce the ability of patients with burns to respond to cold-induced stress.34

We can only speculate on the possible mechanisms underlying the changes associated with propranolol treatment. Decreased catecholamine activity caused by beta-blockade could have direct effects on protein-flux machinery or could act indirectly by changing endogenous insulin responsiveness, cortisol activity, or regional blood flow. Larger studies will be required to make such determinations.

In summary, we have used indirect calorimetry, stable-isotope methods, whole-body potassium scanning, and dual-image x-ray absorptiometry to show that long-term beta-blockade decreases lean-mass catabolism in severely burned children. These changes would presumably improve the patients' strength and ability to recuperate. When it is given in doses that decrease the heart rate by approximately 20 percent from the base-line values and with careful monitoring, propranolol is safe, easily administered, and effective. This therapy may benefit a wide variety of patients who may have a negative nitrogen balance, such as those with trauma and those who are undergoing general surgery.

Supported by grants from Shriners Hospitals for Children (8660 and 8490) and the National Institutes of Health (2T32GM0825611, 1P50GM60338-01, GM56687-02, and MO1 RR 00073).

Presented at the 30th annual meeting of the Western Trauma Association, Squaw Valley, Calif., February 27–March 4, 2000.

We are indebted to Deb Benjamin, Gordon Klein, M.D., and Martin Esch, Ph.D., for assistance in the performance of this study.


Source Information

From the Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Galveston.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Herndon at Shriners Hospitals for Children, 815 Market St., Galveston, TX 77550, or at dherndon{at}utmb.edu.

References

  1. Monk DN, Plank LD, Franch-Arcas G, Finn PJ, Streat SJ, Hill GL. Sequential changes in the metabolic response in critically injured patients during the first 25 days after blunt trauma. Ann Surg 1996;223:395-405. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Bessey PQ, Jiang ZM, Johnson DJ, Smith RJ, Wilmore DW. Posttraumatic skeletal muscle proteolysis: the role of the hormonal environment. World J Surg 1989;13:465-470. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Hart DW, Wolf SE, Mlcak RP, et al. Persistence of muscle catabolism after severe burn. Surgery 2000;128:312-319. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Chang DW, DeSanti L, Demling RH. Anticatabolic and anabolic strategies in critical illness: a review of current treatment modalities. Shock 1998;10:155-160. [Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Harrison TS, Seaton JF, Feller I. Relationship of increased oxygen consumption to catecholamine excretion in thermal burns. Ann Surg 1967;165:169-172. [Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Wilmore DW, Long JM, Mason AD Jr, Skreen RW, Pruitt BA Jr. Catecholamines: mediator of the hypermetabolic response to thermal injury. Ann Surg 1974;180:653-669. [Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Goodall MC, Stone C, Haynes BW Jr. Urinary output of adrenaline and noradrenaline in severe thermal burns. Ann Surg 1957;145:479-487. [Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Wilmore DW, Aulick LH. Metabolic changes in burned patients. Surg Clin North Am 1978;58:1173-1187. [Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Asch MJ, Feldman RJ, Walker HL, et al. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic changes accompanying thermal injury. Ann Surg 1973;178:218-221. [Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Reiss W, Pearson E, Artz CP. The metabolic response to burns. J Clin Invest 1956;35:62-77.
  11. Newsome TW, Mason AD Jr, Pruitt BA Jr. Weight loss following thermal injury. Ann Surg 1973;178:215-217. [Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Herndon DN, Barrow RE, Rutan TC, Minifee P, Jahoor F, Wolfe RR. Effect of propranolol administration on hemodynamic and metabolic responses of burned pediatric patients. Ann Surg 1988;208:484-492. [Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Minifee PK, Barrow RE, Abston S, Desai M, Herndon DN. Improved myocardial oxygen utilization following propranolol infusion in adolescents with postburn hypermetabolism. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24:806-810. [Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Baron PW, Barrow RE, Pierre EJ, Herndon DN. Prolonged use of propranolol safely decreases cardiac work in burned children. J Burn Care Rehabil 1997;18:223-227. [Medline]
  15. Breitenstein E, Chiolero RL, Jequier E, Dayer P, Krupp S, Schutz Y. Effects of beta-blockade on energy metabolism following burns. Burns 1990;16:259-264. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, Tateo I. Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1713-1720. [Free Full Text]
  17. Hart DW, Wolf SE, Chinkes DL, et al. Determinants of skeletal muscle catabolism after severe burn. Ann Surg 2000;232:455-465. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Biolo G, Chinkes D, Zhang XJ, Wolfe RR, Harry M. Vars Research Award: a new model to determine in vivo the relationship between amino acid transmembrane transport and protein kinetics in muscle. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992;16:305-315. [Free Full Text]
  19. Biolo G, Maggi SP, Williams BD, Tipton KD, Wolfe RR. Increased rates of muscle protein turnover and amino acid transport after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 1995;268:E514-E520. [Free Full Text]
  20. Ellis KJ, Shypailo RJ. Total body potassium in the infant. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 1992;161:61-9.
  21. Forbes GB, Lewis AM. Total sodium, potassium, and chloride in adult man. J Clin Invest 1956;35:596-600.
  22. Wells JC, Fuller NJ, Dewit O, Fewtrell MS, Elia M, Cole TJ. Four-component model of body composition in children: density and hydration of fat-free mass and comparison with simpler models. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:904-912. [Free Full Text]
  23. Gore DC, Honeycutt D, Jahoor F, Wolfe RR, Herndon DN. Effect of exogenous growth hormone on whole-body and isolated-limb protein kinetics in burned patients. Arch Surg 1991;126:38-43. [Free Full Text]
  24. Herndon DN, Nguyen TT, Wolfe RR, et al. Lipolysis in burned patients is stimulated by the beta 2-receptor for catecholamines. Arch Surg 1994;129:1301-1304. [Free Full Text]
  25. Eisemann JH, Huntington GB, Ferrell CL. Effects of dietary clenbuterol on metabolism of the hindquarters in steers. J Anim Sci 1988;66:342-353.
  26. MacRae JC, Skene PA, Connell A, Buchan V, Lobley GE. The action of the beta-agonist clenbuterol on protein and energy metabolism in fattening wether lambs. Br J Nutr 1988;59:457-465. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Sakurai Y, Aarsland A, Herndon DN, et al. Stimulation of muscle protein synthesis by long-term insulin infusion in severely burned patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:283-94, 294. [Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Herndon DN, Ramzy PI, DebRoy MA, et al. Muscle protein catabolism after severe burn: effects of IGF-1/IGFBP-3 treatment. Ann Surg 1999;229:713-722. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Hart DW, Wolf SE, Ramzy PI, et al. Anabolic effects of oxandrolone after severe burn. Ann Surg 2001;233:556-564. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Gore DC, Honeycutt D, Jahoor F, Barrow RE, Wolfe RR, Herndon DN. Propranolol diminishes extremity blood flow in burned patients. Ann Surg 1991;213:568-574. [Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Kien CL, Young VR, Rohrbaugh DK, Burke JF. Increased rates of whole body protein synthesis and breakdown in children recovering from burns. Ann Surg 1978;187:383-391. [Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Tipton KD, Rasmussen BB, Miller SL, et al. Timing of amino acid-carbohydrate ingestion alters anabolic response of muscle to resistance exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001;281:E197-E206. [Free Full Text]
  33. Wang ZM, Visser M, Ma R, et al. Skeletal muscle mass: evaluation of neutron activation and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry methods. J Appl Physiol 1996;80:824-831. [Free Full Text]
  34. Honeycutt D, Barrow RE, Herndon DN. Cold stress response in patients with severe burns after beta-blockade. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992;13:181-186. [CrossRef][Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Sheridan, R. L.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.