FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Volume 345:1435-1443 November 15, 2001 Number 20 Next

Abstract PDF Editorial by Jessup, M. Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Implantable left ventricular assist devices have benefited patients with end-stage heart failure as a bridge to cardiac transplantation, but their long-term use for the purpose of enhancing survival and the quality of life has not been evaluated.

Methods We randomly assigned 129 patients with end-stage heart failure who were ineligible for cardiac transplantation to receive a left ventricular assist device (68 patients) or optimal medical management (61). All patients had symptoms of New York Heart Association class IV heart failure.

Results Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a reduction of 48 percent in the risk of death from any cause in the group that received left ventricular assist devices as compared with the medical-therapy group (relative risk, 0.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.78; P=0.001). The rates of survival at one year were 52 percent in the device group and 25 percent in the medical-therapy group (P=0.002), and the rates at two years were 23 percent and 8 percent (P=0.09), respectively. The frequency of serious adverse events in the device group was 2.35 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.86 to 2.95) times that in the medical-therapy group, with a predominance of infection, bleeding, and malfunction of the device. The quality of life was significantly improved at one year in the device group.

Conclusions The use of a left ventricular assist device in patients with advanced heart failure resulted in a clinically meaningful survival benefit and an improved quality of life. A left ventricular assist device is an acceptable alternative therapy in selected patients who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation.

Patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure⁴ and, recently, some with more severe disease⁵ have been shown to benefit from drug therapy. Nevertheless, the survival and the quality of life of patients with severe heart failure remain limited. Cardiac transplantation is the only treatment that provides substantial individual benefit, but with fewer than 3000 donor organs available worldwide per year, its impact is epidemiologically trivial.⁶ The success and limitations of transplantation have stimulated interest in alternative approaches to myocardial replacement.

Since the inception of the artificial-heart program at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 1964, various circulatory-support devices have been developed for short-term use in patients with end-stage heart failure.⁷ In 1994, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved pneumatically driven left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation, and self-contained, vented electric devices were approved for this purpose in 1998.⁸ Short-term use of these devices in patients awaiting transplantation normalizes hemodynamics, improves end-organ dysfunction and exercise tolerance, allows patients to be sent home, and provides a reasonable quality of life, with a relatively low incidence of major adverse events.^{9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16} One type of left ventricular assist device (HeartMate vented electric device, Thoratec, Pleasanton, Calif.) has textured interior surfaces and is associated with a low incidence of thromboembolic events without systemic anticoagulation.^17,18 We evaluated the suitability of these devices for their ultimate intended use as a long-term myocardial-replacement therapy for patients who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation.

Methods

Organization of the Trial

The investigator-initiated study was conducted at 20 experienced cardiac transplantation centers under a cooperative agreement among Columbia University, the NIH, and Thoratec. The trial was supervised by a steering committee and executed by an operations committee and an independent coordinating center (the International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research at Columbia University). An independent morbidity and mortality committee reviewed causes of death and adverse events. The NIH appointed a data and safety monitoring board to assess the progress of the trial and review outcomes. The FDA granted an investigational-device exemption to facilitate this pivotal phase 3 trial. Participating institutional review boards approved the protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Patients

Eligible patients were adults with chronic end-stage heart failure and contraindications to transplantation. Initial entry criteria included the presence of symptoms of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure for at least 90 days despite attempted therapy with angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and digoxin; a left ventricular ejection fraction of 25 percent or less; and a peak oxygen consumption of no more than 12 ml per kilogram of body weight per minute or a continued need for intravenous inotropic therapy owing to symptomatic hypotension, decreasing renal function, or worsening pulmonary congestion.¹⁹ Patients could continue to receive beta-blockers if they had been administered for at least 60 of the 90 days before randomization.

Eighteen months after enrollment began, the investigators broadened the entry criteria to increase enrollment by including patients who had had symptoms of NYHA class IV heart failure for 60 days and had a peak oxygen consumption of no more than 14 ml per kilogram per minute and patients who had been in NYHA class III or IV for at least 28 days and who had received at least 14 days of support with an intraaortic balloon pump or with a dependence on intravenous inotropic agents, with two failed weaning attempts. Only five patients (three in the group that received left ventricular assist devices and two in the medical-therapy group) were enrolled who met the broadened criteria.

In all patients, transplantation was contraindicated for at least one of the following reasons: an age of more than 65 years, the presence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage, the presence of chronic renal failure with a serum creatinine concentration of more than 2.5 mg per deciliter (221 µmol per liter) for at least 90 days before randomization, or the presence of other clinically significant conditions. Detailed exclusion criteria have been described previously.¹⁹

Study Design

Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a vented electric left ventricular assist device or optimal medical therapy. Randomization followed a block design to ensure the continued equivalence of group size and was stratified according to center. The eligibility of patients was determined by investigators at each site and confirmed by a gatekeeper at the coordinating center. The surgical risk associated with the implantation of the left ventricular assist device and the obviousness of the device precluded a double-blind design. However, all investigators except the statisticians were unaware of overall outcome data throughout the enrollment period. In accordance with FDA requirements, Thoratec received ongoing data on patients in the group that received left ventricular assist devices, but was unaware of the data on patients in the medical-therapy group.

All patients who were randomly assigned to receive the assist device received the device (Figure 1) and associated medical care. The device was implanted into a preperitoneal pocket or the peritoneal cavity, depending on the surgeon's preference. Surgical management followed guidelines developed and updated by a surgical-management committee and included preoperative measures (e.g., prophylaxis with antimicrobial agents), intraoperative measures (e.g., placement of the drive line), and postoperative measures (e.g., changes of exit-site dressing).

View larger version (59K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Components of the Left Ventricular Assist Device. The inflow cannula is inserted into the apex of the left ventricle, and the outflow cannula is anastomosed to the ascending aorta. Blood returns from the lungs to the left side of the heart and exits through the left ventricular apex and across an inflow valve into the prosthetic pumping chamber. Blood is then actively pumped through an outflow valve into the ascending aorta. The pumping chamber is placed within the abdominal wall or peritoneal cavity. A percutaneous drive line carries the electrical cable and air vent to the battery packs (only the pack on the right side is shown) and electronic controls, which are worn on a shoulder holster and belt, respectively.

 
Optimal medical management followed guidelines developed by the medical committee, with the goals of optimizing organ perfusion and minimizing symptoms of congestive heart failure. Recognizing the unprecedented severity of illness in this group of patients, the committee provided specific guidance regarding the use of therapy with angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors and encouraged the discontinuation of intravenous inotropic infusions. Patients were followed up monthly when they were out of the hospital.

Statistical Analysis

The primary end point was death from any cause and was compared between groups with the use of the log-rank statistic. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression to estimate relative risks and 95 percent confidence intervals and to adjust for differences in base-line outcome predictors. Analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle.

The trial was designed to enroll 140 patients and to continue until 92 deaths had occurred. These figures were estimated on the basis of the following assumptions: the two-year mortality rate among the patients in the medical-therapy group would be 75 percent, treatment with a left ventricular assist device would reduce the risk of death by 33 percent, and the study would have 90 percent power (two-sided =0.05) to detect a significant difference between the treatment groups. We conducted three interim analyses (after 23, 46, and 69 deaths had occurred), using a two-sided significance test with the O'Brien–Fleming spending function and a type I error rate of 5 percent.

Secondary end points included the incidence of serious adverse events, the number of days of hospitalization, the quality of life, symptoms of depression, and functional status. Adverse events were considered to be serious if they caused death or permanent disability, were life-threatening, or required or prolonged hospitalization. The frequency of adverse events was analyzed by means of Poisson regression. The quality of life and functional status were assessed with use of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, two prespecified subscales — physical function and emotional role — of the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36), and the NYHA classification.^20,21,22 Symptoms of depression were assessed with use of the Beck Depression Inventory. We used analysis of covariance to test for significant differences in the mean quality of life among surviving patients, after adjustment for base-line values.

The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire contains 21 questions regarding patients' perception of the effects of heart failure on their daily lives. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 5, producing a total score between 0 and 105. The higher the score, the worse the quality of life. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale measuring eight health-related aspects: physical function, social function, physical role, emotional role, mental health, energy, pain, and general health perceptions. The score for each of the eight health concepts ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The Beck Depression Inventory assesses the severity of depression. Scores of 0 to 9 are considered to be normal, scores of 10 to 18 indicate mild-to-moderate depression, scores of 19 to 29 indicate moderate-to-severe depression, and scores of 30 to 64 indicate severe depression.

Results

Base-Line Characteristics

A total of 129 patients were enrolled from May 15, 1998, to July 27, 2001. Enrollment ended once the predetermined number of 92 deaths had occurred. Sixty-eight patients received left ventricular assist devices, and 61 were assigned to receive optimal medical management. The two groups were similar with regard to base-line characteristics (Table 1). Age was the most common reason for ineligibility for cardiac transplantation. All 129 patients were included in the primary end-point analysis. Two patients in the medical-therapy group withdrew from the trial one and six months after randomization. All patients who were assigned to receive a left ventricular assist device had the device implanted. No patients in either group crossed over, and none underwent cardiac transplantation.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Base-Line Characteristics of the Patients.

 
Survival

Figure 2 shows the Kaplan–Meier survival curves. There was a reduction of 48 percent in the risk of death from any cause — the primary end point — in the group that received left ventricular assist devices, as compared with the medical-therapy group (relative risk, 0.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.78; P=0.001). The Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival at one year were 52 percent in the device group and 25 percent in the medical-therapy group (P=0.002) and at two years were 23 percent and 8 percent (P=0.09), respectively. Median survival was 408 days in the device group and 150 days in the medical-therapy group. At the time of the final analysis, 41 deaths had occurred in the device group and 54 in the medical-therapy group. Table 2 lists the causes of death. Terminal heart failure caused the majority of deaths in the medical-therapy group, whereas the most common causes of death in the device group were sepsis (41 percent of deaths) and failure of the device (17 percent).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Analysis of Survival in the Group That Received Left Ventricular (LV) Assist Devices and the Group That Received Optimal Medical Therapy. Crosses depict censored patients. Enrollment in the trial was terminated after 92 patients had died; 95 deaths had occurred by the time of the final analysis.

 

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Causes of Death.

 
Although the trial was not designed to have enough statistical power for subgroup analyses, a prespecified analysis with stratification according to age (18 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, 70 years) showed that there was a significant reduction in the risk of death among patients in the device group who were 60 to 69 years old, as compared with patients in the medical-therapy group who were 60 to 69 years old (relative risk, 0.49; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.95), and a trend toward a benefit in the younger age group (relative risk, 0.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.17 to 1.28) and the older age group (relative risk, 0.59; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 1.15). In the overall group of 22 patients who were younger than 60 years, the one-year survival rate was 74 percent in the device group (13 patients) and 33 percent in the medical-therapy group (9 patients) (P=0.05). In the group of 49 patients who were 60 to 69 years old, the one-year survival rate was 47 percent in the device group (29 patients) and 15 percent in the medical-therapy group (20 patients) (P=0.009).

Quality of Life

All patients completed the base-line assessments of the quality of life, and there were no significant differences between groups. Table 3 shows the results one year after enrollment, and Table 4 shows the results of some measures assessed by the physical-function subscale of the SF-36. Five of the 11 patients in the medical-therapy group who were alive at one year did not complete the questionnaires (3 were too ill, 1 could not arrange transportation, and 1 was not tested because of a scheduling error). All but 1 of the 24 patients in the device group completed the questionnaires (1 patient could not arrange transportation). Scores on the physical-function and emotional-role subscales of the SF-36 and the Beck Depression Inventory and the NYHA class were all significantly better in the device group at one year. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score was better in the device group than in the medical-therapy group at one year, but the difference was not significant.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. Quality of Life and Functional Status of Patients at One Year.

 

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 4. Sample Activities Assessed by the Physical-Function Subscale of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey Questionnaire at One Year.

 
Adverse Events

Owing to the difference in survival, we reported adverse events as rates per patient-year.²³ One patient in each group died immediately after randomization and was therefore excluded from the analysis. Patients in the device group were more than twice as likely as patients in the medical-therapy group to have a serious adverse event (rate ratio, 2.35; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.86 to 2.95) (Table 5).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 5. Incidence of Serious Adverse Events.

 
            Events Related to the Device

Within three months after implantation, the probability of infection of the left ventricular assist device was 28 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 15 to 38 percent). Although most of these infections were in the drive-line tract and pocket and were treated with local measures and antibiotics, fatal sepsis was common. Within six months after implantation, the frequency of bleeding was 42 percent. No system had failed by 12 months, but the probability of device failure was 35 percent at 24 months. The device was replaced in 10 patients.

            Hospitalization

The protocol required all patients to be hospitalized at the time of randomization. Both the median number of days spent in and the median number spent out of the hospital were greater in the device group than in the medical-therapy group (Table 6).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 6. Hospitalization Experience.

 
Discussion

This trial demonstrates that long-term support with a left ventricular assist device resulted in substantial improvement in survival in patients with severe heart failure who were not candidates for cardiac transplantation. The patients in the medical-therapy group received optimal medical care with digoxin, diuretics, angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors, and beta-blockers from heart-failure specialists. The one-year mortality rate of 75 percent in this group exceeded the rates for the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and breast, lung, and colon cancer^24,25 and was more than four times that in trials of beta-blockers.⁵

The patients we enrolled had more severe disease at base line and a higher mortality rate during subsequent medical therapy than did patients in other randomized trials of treatment for heart failure.^4,5,26 Patients well enough to undergo exercise testing had a peak oxygen consumption of only 9.18±1.98 ml per kilogram per minute, a value that is highly predictive of early mortality.²⁷ In the 68 percent of patients who could not exercise, an inability to be weaned from intravenous inotropic drugs was documented.

The implantation of a left ventricular assist device was associated with a relative reduction in the risk of death of 48 percent during the entire follow-up period and an absolute reduction in the mortality rate of 27 percent at one year. These findings imply that for every 1000 patients with end-stage heart failure, the implantation of a left ventricular assist device could prevent at least 270 deaths annually. The treatment effect is nearly four times that of beta-blockers or angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors, which have been estimated to prevent 70 deaths for every 1000 patients treated who receive either type of agent.^5,28 Nevertheless, the magnitude of this reduction must be considered in the context of the greater complexity of therapy with a left ventricular assist device than of drug therapy.

Early experience with artificial hearts suggested that any potential survival benefit would be achieved at an unacceptable cost in the quality of life.²⁹ In our study, measurements of the quality of life at base line and during the study in the medical-therapy group reflected the severe physical, emotional, and functional impairment of these terminally ill patients. Although the scores at one year on the physical-function and emotional-role subscales of the SF-36 were significantly better in the device group than in the medical-therapy group, they were not those of healthy people in the general population.³⁰ However, the physical-function scores were similar to those reported for patients receiving long-term hemodialysis and ambulatory patients with heart failure,^30,31 and the emotional-role scores were better than those reported for patients with clinical depression and similar to those for ambulatory patients with heart failure. Although not statistically significant, the difference of 17 points in the mean scores on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire at one year between patients in the device group and patients in the medical-therapy group greatly exceeded the 5-point threshold for meaningful improvement used in other studies.³²

Despite the substantial survival benefit, the morbidity and mortality associated with the use of the left ventricular assist device were considerable. In particular, infection and mechanical failure of the device were major factors in the two-year survival rate of only 23 percent. The device employed requires a percutaneous line, which can become a conduit for bacterial and fungal infection. Investigators found that malnutrition was a problem in these patients, which predisposed them to infection and other complications. Factors contributing to postoperative malnutrition include early satiety from the bulk of the intra-abdominally implanted device, chronic inflammation associated with heart failure and the device, and severe and often underdiagnosed preoperative debilitation.³³

Failure of the left ventricular assist device was the second most frequent cause of death in the device group. The findings of inflow-valve failure and late erosions of the outflow graft resulting from kinking have already led to modifications in the device. Malfunction of the mechanical parts, such as rupture of the lining, motor failure, and wear on the bearings, also limits the durability of the device. The rate of neurologic events in the device group was 4.35 times as high as the rate in the medical-therapy group. However, 76 percent of patients in the device group were free of serious neurologic events without routine anticoagulation. Moreover, 47 percent of the serious neurologic events in this group were transient, with toxic and metabolic causes. The relatively low proportion of patients in the device group who had an ischemic stroke (10 percent) during follow-up is probably related to the unique textured surfaces of the device we used.

We believe that the decreased mortality rates and increased rates of adverse events in the device group represent an acceptable trade-off, given the natural history of end-stage heart failure. The frequency of complications indicates the need for further improvements in patient care and the design of the device. Although this learning-curve phenomenon was not significant, there was a 25 percent decline in the mortality relative risk per year when survival was adjusted for the date of entry in the trial.

Our findings establish the left ventricular assist device as a new long-term myocardial replacement therapy, joining cardiac transplantation in the treatment options for end-stage heart failure. Although transplantation has never been compared with medical therapy in a randomized trial, the 1-year survival rate of more than 80 percent and the 10-year survival rate of nearly 50 percent for transplantation far exceed the survival rate for left ventricular assist devices in our study.⁶ However, the outcomes of transplantation do not include the substantial mortality rates among patients who are awaiting transplantation. Currently, fewer than 3000 donor hearts per year are available worldwide.⁶ The combination of the availability of left ventricular assist devices and the encouraging one-year survival rate of 74 percent in our patients who were younger than 60 years suggests that a comparison of the long-term use of these devices and transplantation may soon be appropriate.

Many new devices that may be equivalent or superior to the device we used are now in early clinical trials. Such devices include fully implantable pulsatile and smaller, nonpulsatile left ventricular assist devices and a fully implantable artificial heart. We believe that our findings establish new standards for survival, quality of life, and adverse events. The limitations we found clearly justify an intensification of efforts to improve both these devices and patient care, with the goal of improving outcomes in the sickest of patients and paving the way for an assessment of the use of mechanical circulatory assistance in patients with serious, but less severe heart-failure syndromes.

Supported in part by a cooperative agreement (HL-53986) with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health and Thoratec Corporation.

Mr. Poirier is a full-time employee of Thoratec, in which he holds an equity interest.

^* The members of the study group are listed in the Appendix.

Source Information

From the College of Physicians and Surgeons (E.A.R., A.C.G., A.J.M., D.D.A., A.R.T., R.G.L., P.M.), and the Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health (A.C.G., A.J.M., D.F.H., P.M.), Columbia University, New York; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (L.W.S.); Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, Calif. (W.D.); LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City (J.W.L.); and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md. (J.T.W.).

Other authors were Nuala S. Ronan, R.N., Peter A. Shapiro, M.D., and Ronald M. Lazar, Ph.D. (College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York); Leslie W. Miller, M.D. (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis); Lopa Gupta, R.D., M.P.H. (College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York); O. Howard Frazier, M.D. (Texas Heart Institute, Houston); Patrice Desvigne-Nickens, M.D. (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md.); Mehmet C. Oz, M.D. (College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York); and Victor L. Poirier, M.B.A. (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif.).

Address reprint requests to the International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research, Columbia University, 600 W. 168th St., 7th Fl., New York, NY 10032.

References

1. 2001 Heart and stroke statistical update. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2000.
2. O'Connell JB, Birstow MR. Economic impact of heart failure in the United States: time for a different approach. J Heart Lung Transplant 1994;13:S107-S112.[Medline]
3. Califf RM, Adams KF, McKenna WJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of epoprostenol therapy for severe congestive heart failure: the Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST). Am Heart J 1997;134:44-54.[Medline]
4. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991;325:293-302.[Abstract]
5. Packer M, Coats AJS, Fowler MB, et al. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1651-1658.[Abstract/Full Text]
6. Hosenpud JD, Bennett LE, Keck BM, Boucek MM, Novick RJ. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: seventeenth official report -- 2000. J Heart Lung Transplant 2000;19:909-931.[Medline]
7. The artificial heart program: current status and history. In: Hogness JR, VanAntwerp M, eds. The artificial heart: prototypes, policies, and patients. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1991:14-25.
8. Goldstein DJ, Oz MC, Rose EA. Implantable left ventricular assist devices. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1522-1533.[Full Text]
9. Frazier OH, Rose EA, Macmanus Q, et al. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:1080-1090.[Abstract]
10. Pennington DG, McBride LR, Peigh PS, Miller LW, Swartz MT. Eight years' experience with bridging to cardiac transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:472-481.[Abstract/Full Text]
11. Korfer R, El-Banayosy A, Arusoglu L, et al. Single-center experience with the Thoratec ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:596-600.[Abstract/Full Text]
12. McBride LR, Naunheim KS, Fiore AC, Moroney DA, Swartz MT. Clinical experience with 111 Thoratec ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1233-1239.[Abstract/Full Text]
13. Portner PM, Oyer PE, Pennington DG, et al. Implantable electrical left ventricular assist system: bridge to transplantation and the future. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:142-150.[Abstract]
14. Moskowitz AJ, Weinberg AD, Oz MC, Williams DL. Quality of life with an implanted left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1764-1769.[Abstract/Full Text]
15. Catanese KA, Goldstein DJ, Williams DL, et al. Outpatient left ventricular assist device support: a destination rather than a bridge. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:646-653.[Abstract/Full Text]
16. Mehta SM, Aufiero TX, Pae WE Jr, Miller CA, Pierce WS. Combined Registry for the Clinical Use of Mechanical Ventricular Assist Pumps and the Total Artificial Heart in conjunction with heart transplantation: sixth official report -- 1994. J Heart Lung Transplant 1994;14:585-593.
17. Slater JE, Rose EA, Levin HR, et al. Low thromboembolic risk without anticoagulation using advanced-design left ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1321-1327.[Abstract/Full Text]
18. Spanier T, Oz MC, Levin HR, et al. Activation of coagulation and fibrinolytic pathways in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1090-1097.[Abstract/Full Text]
19. Rose EA, Moskowitz AJ, Packer M, et al. The REMATCH trial: rationale, design, and end points: Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:723-730.[Abstract/Full Text]
20. Rector TS, Cohn JN, Pimobendan Multicenter Research Group. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Am Heart J 1992;124:1017-1025.[Medline]
21. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: a user's manual. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.
22. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247-263.[Medline]
23. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:932-935.[Abstract/Full Text]
24. Lee LM, Karon JM, Selik R, Neal JJ, Fleming PL. Survival after AIDS diagnosis in adolescents and adults during the treatment era, United States, 1984-1997. JAMA 2001;285:1308-1315.[Medline]
25. Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, et al., eds. SEER cancer statistics review, 1973-1998. Bethesda, Md.: National Cancer Institute, 2001.
26. Packer M, Carver JR, Rodeheffer RJ, et al. Effect of oral milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1468-1475.[Abstract]
27. Mancini DM, Eisen H, Kussmaul W, Mull R, Edmunds LH Jr, Wilson JR. Value of peak exercise oxygen consumption for optimal timing of cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with heart failure. Circulation 1991;83:778-786.[Abstract]
28. Kjekshus J, Swedberg K, Snapinn S. Effects of enalapril on long-term mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:103-107.[Medline]
29. The Schroeder Family, Barnette M. The Bill Schroeder story: an artificial heart patient's historic ordeal and the amazing family effort that supported him. New York: William Morrow, 1987:383.
30. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
31. Singer MA, Hopman WM, MacKenzie TA. Physical functioning and mental health in patients with chronic medical conditions. Qual Life Res 1999;8:687-691.[Medline]
32. Rector TS, Tschumperlin LK, Kubo SH, et al. Use of the Living With Heart Failure questionnaire to ascertain patients' perspectives on improvement in quality of life versus risk of drug-induced death. J Card Fail 1995;1:201-206.[Medline]
33. el-Amir NG, Gardocki M, Levin HR, et al. Gastrointestinal consequences of left ventricular assist device placement. ASAIO J 1996;42:150-153.[Medline]

The members of the REMATCH Study Group are as follows: Steering Committee: E. Rose (chair), R. Bourge, M. Costanzo, W. Dembitsky, O. Frazier, A. Gelijns, D. Heitjan, W. Holman, B. Jaski, S. Krueger, J. Long, D. Mancini, P. Meier, L. Miller, A. Moskowitz, P. Desvigne-Nickens, R. Oren, M. Oz, M. Packer, S. Park, W. Piccione, Jr., E. Raines, D. Renlund, W. Richenbacher, P. Shapiro, L. Warner Stevenson, A. Tector, A. Tierney, J. Watson, and J. Willerson; Operations Subcommittee: R. Arons, D. Ascheim, L. Gupta, K. Holl, R. Lazar, R. Levitan, N. Ronan, and J. Zivin; Morbidity and Mortality Committee: V. Jeevanandam (chair), S. Factor, D. Maki, J. O'Connell, and J. Weinberger; Investigators: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston — C. Collins, G. Couper, N. Cummings, J. Fang, W. Johnson, and C. Saniuk; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland — R. Hobbs, P. McCarthy, M. Yeager, and C. Vacha; Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York — K. Idrissi, M. Flannery, and Y. Naka; Jewish Hospital Heart & Lung Institute, Louisville, Ky. — G. Bhat, A. Brown, R. Dowling, and B.J. Henehan; Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Va. — N. Burton, A. Keller, T. Krause, and P. Stenborg; LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City — B. Muhlestein, K. Nelson, and J. Pitt; Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill. — S. Botkin, B. Foy, M. Laff, and G.M. Mullen; Nebraska Heart Institute, Lincoln, Nebr. — S. Krueger, E. Raines, P. Topf, and P. Ver Maas; Ochsner Medical Institutions, New Orleans — L. Kersker, M. Mehra, and C. Van Meter; Rush–Presbyterian–St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago — C. Downer, W. Kao, and A. Mattea; Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, Calif. — S. Chillcott; St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee — J. Hosenpud, D. Hutson, L. Mathiak, and L. Wann; Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia — H. Eisen, S. Furukawa, and J. Hargraves; Texas Heart Institute, Houston — J. Kolesar, E. Massin, T. Myers, and B. Radovancevic; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham — M. Aron, J. Jackson, and C. Wainscott; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic, Iowa City — K. Seemuth; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor — K. Aaronson, F. Pagani, and S. Wright; University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Minneapolis — S. Ormaza; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas — S. Daly, A. Dierlam, D. Meyer, and C. Yancy, Jr.; Medical City Dallas, Dallas — T. Dewey, K. Hoang, G. Wendt, and D. Tennison; University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle — W. Curtis, D. Fishbein, and S. Andrus; West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh — K. Lockard, M. Mathier, G. Magovern, Jr., E. Savage, and R. Shannon; Advisors: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md. — A. Berson, D. Follman, and G. Sopko; Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif. — L. Damme, J. Foss, T. Krauskopf, and V. Poirier; Data and Safety Monitoring Board: L.H. Edmunds (chair), J. Anderson, J. Chesebro, S. McKinlay, H. Smith, and H. Valentine.

Abstract PDF Editorial by Jessup, M. Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Prucz, R. B., Weiss, E. S., Patel, N. D., Nwakanma, L. U., Baumgartner, W. A., Conte, J. V. (2008). Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With or Without Surgical Ventricular Restoration: A Comparison. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 86: 806-814 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Patel, N. D., Weiss, E. S., Schaffer, J., Ullrich, S. L., Rivard, D. C., Shah, A. S., Russell, S. D., Conte, J. V. (2008). Right Heart Dysfunction After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Comparison of the Pulsatile HeartMate I and Axial-Flow HeartMate II Devices. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 86: 832-840 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pretre, R., Haussler, A., Bettex, D., Genoni, M. (2008). Right-Sided Univentricular Cardiac Assistance in a Failing Fontan Circulation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 86: 1018-1020 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Osaki, S., Edwards, N. M., Velez, M., Johnson, M. R., Murray, M. A., Hoffmann, J. A., Kohmoto, T. (2008). Improved survival in patients with ventricular assist device therapy: the University of Wisconsin experience.. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 34: 281-288 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Struber, M., Sander, K., Lahpor, J., Ahn, H., Litzler, P.-Y., Drakos, S. G., Musumeci, F., Schlensak, C., Friedrich, I., Gustafsson, R., Oertel, F., Leprince, P. (2008). HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 34: 289-294 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Guha, A., Munjampalli, S., Bandi, V., Loebe, M., Noon, G., Lunn, W. (2008). Pleural Effusion After Ventricular Assist Device Placement: Prevalence and Pleural Fluid Characteristics. Chest 134: 382-386 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schuerer, D. J. E., Kolovos, N. S., Boyd, K. V., Coopersmith, C. M. (2008). Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Current Clinical Practice, Coding, and Reimbursement. Chest 134: 179-184 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Allen, L. A., Yager, J. E., Funk, M. J., Levy, W. C., Tulsky, J. A., Bowers, M. T., Dodson, G. C., O'Connor, C. M., Felker, G. M. (2008). Discordance Between Patient-Predicted and Model-Predicted Life Expectancy Among Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure. JAMA 299: 2533-2542 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Long, J. W., Healy, A. H., Rasmusson, B. Y., Cowley, C. G., Nelson, K. E., Kfoury, A. G., Clayson, S. E., Reid, B. B., Moore, S. A., Blank, D. U., Renlund, D. G. (2008). Improving outcomes with long-term "destination" therapy using left ventricular assist devices.. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 135: 1353-1361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Braunwald, E. (2008). The Management of Heart Failure: The Past, the Present, and the Future. Circ Heart Fail 1: 58-62 [Full Text]  
• Gregoric, I. D., Bruckner, B. A., Jacob, L., Kar, B., Cohn, W. E., La Francesca, S., Frazier, O.H. (2008). Clinical Experience With Sternotomy Versus Subcostal Approach for Exchange of the HeartMate XVE to the HeartMate II Ventricular Assist Device.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 85: 1646-1649 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kartha, V., Gomez, W., Wu, B., Tremper, K. (2008). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with an implantable left ventricular assist device. Br J Anaesth 100: 652-655 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Takeda, K., Matsumiya, G., Matsue, H., Sakaki, M., Sakaguchi, T., Fujita, T., Sawa, Y. (2008). Left Ventricular Reconstructive Surgery in Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 85: 1339-1343 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Soppa, G. K.R., Lee, J., Stagg, M. A., Felkin, L. E., Barton, P. J.R., Siedlecka, U., Youssef, S., Yacoub, M. H., Terracciano, C. M.N. (2008). Role and possible mechanisms of clenbuterol in enhancing reverse remodelling during mechanical unloading in murine heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 77: 695-706 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bullard, T. A., Protack, T. L., Aguilar, F., Bagwe, S., Massey, H. T., Blaxall, B. C. (2008). Identification of Nogo as a novel indicator of heart failure. Physiol. Genomics 32: 182-189 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Padera, R. F. Jr., Schoen, F. J. (2008). Pathology of Cardiac Surgery. Card Surg Adult 3: 111-178 [Full Text]  
• Nwakanma, L. U., Shah, A. S., Conte, J. V., Baumgartner, W. A. (2008). Heart Transplantation. Card Surg Adult 3: 1539-1578 [Full Text]  
• Aggarwal, S., Cheema, F., Oz, M. C., Naka, Y. (2008). Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support. Card Surg Adult 3: 1609-1628 [Full Text]  
• Frazier, O.H., Myers, T. J., Gregoric, I. (2008). Total Artificial Heart. Card Surg Adult 3: 1629-1638 [Full Text]  
• Kooshkabadi, M., Kalogeropoulos, A., Babaliaros, V. C., Lerakis, S. (2008). Transesophageal guided left atrial positioning of a percutaneous ventricular assist device. Eur J Echocardiogr 9: 175-177 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jeger, R. V., Lowe, A. M., Buller, C. E., Pfisterer, M. E., Dzavik, V., Webb, J. G., Hochman, J. S., Jorde, U. P., for the SHOCK Investigators, (2007). Hemodynamic Parameters Are Prognostically Important in Cardiogenic Shock But Similar Following Early Revascularization or Initial Medical Stabilization: A Report From the SHOCK Trial. Chest 132: 1794-1803 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Esmore, D., Spratt, P., Larbalestier, R., Tsui, S., Fiane, A., Ruygrok, P., Meyers, D., Woodard, J. (2007). VentrAssistTM left ventricular assist device: clinical trial results and Clinical Development Plan update. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 32: 735-744 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haft, J., Armstrong, W., Dyke, D. B., Aaronson, K. D., Koelling, T. M., Farrar, D. J., Pagani, F. D. (2007). Hemodynamic and Exercise Performance With Pulsatile and Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Circulation 116: I-8-I-15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mau, J., Menzie, S., Ward, M., Bundgaard, H., Hunyor, S. (2007). Time-dependent response of both ventricles after septal ablation: Implications for biventricular support after left ventricular assist device placement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 134: 579-586 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stone, M. E. (2007). Current Status of Mechanical Circulatory Assistance. SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 11: 185-204 [Abstract]  
• Chumnanvej, S., Wood, M. J., MacGillivray, T. E., Melo, M. F. V. (2007). Perioperative Echocardiographic Examination for Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. Anesth. Analg. 105: 583-601 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miller, L. W., Pagani, F. D., Russell, S. D., John, R., Boyle, A. J., Aaronson, K. D., Conte, J. V., Naka, Y., Mancini, D., Delgado, R. M., MacGillivray, T. E., Farrar, D. J., Frazier, O.H., the HeartMate II Clinical Investigators, (2007). Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation. NEJM 357: 885-896 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rogers, J. G., Butler, J., Lansman, S. L., Gass, A., Portner, P. M., Pasque, M. K., Pierson, R. N. III, for the INTrEPID Investigators, (2007). Chronic Mechanical Circulatory Support for Inotrope-Dependent Heart Failure Patients Who Are Not Transplant Candidates: Results of the INTrEPID Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 741-747 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stevenson, L. W., Couper, G. (2007). On the Fledgling Field of Mechanical Circulatory Support. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 748-751 [Full Text]  
• Zierer, A., Melby, S. J., Voeller, R. K., Guthrie, T. J., Ewald, G. A., Shelton, K., Pasque, M. K., Moon, M. R., Damiano, R. J. Jr, Moazami, N. (2007). Late-Onset Driveline Infections: The Achilles' Heel of Prolonged Left Ventricular Assist Device Support. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 84: 515-520 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• John, R., Liao, K., Lietz, K., Kamdar, F., Colvin-Adams, M., Boyle, A., Miller, L., Joyce, L. (2007). Experience with the Levitronix CentriMag circulatory support system as a bridge to decision in patients with refractory acute cardiogenic shock and multisystem organ failure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 134: 351-358 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kirkpatrick, J. N., Vannan, M. A., Narula, J., Lang, R. M. (2007). Echocardiography in Heart Failure: Applications, Utility, and New Horizons. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 381-396 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hunt, S. A. (2007). Mechanical Circulatory Support: New Data, Old Problems. Circulation 116: 461-462 [Full Text]  
• Lietz, K., Long, J. W., Kfoury, A. G., Slaughter, M. S., Silver, M. A., Milano, C. A., Rogers, J. G., Naka, Y., Mancini, D., Miller, L. W. (2007). Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy in the Post-REMATCH Era: Implications for Patient Selection. Circulation 116: 497-505 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kondoh, H., Sawa, Y., Fukushima, N., Matsumiya, G., Miyagawa, S., Kitagawa-Sakakida, S., Imanishi, Y., Kawaguchi, N., Matsuura, N., Matsuda, H. (2007). Combined Strategy Using Myoblasts and Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Dilated Cardiomyopathic Hamsters. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 84: 134-141 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Patel, J., Heywood, J. T. (2007). Mode of Death in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure. J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THER 12: 127-136 [Abstract]  
• Patel, N. D., Williams, J. A., Nwakanma, L. U., Weiss, E. S., Conte, J. V. (2007). Impact of Lateral Wall Myocardial Infarction on Outcomes After Surgical Ventricular Restoration. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83: 2017-2028 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Slaughter, M. S., Tsui, S. S., El-Banayosy, A., Sun, B. C., Kormos, R. L., Mueller, D. K., Massey, H. T., Icenogle, T. B., Farrar, D. J., Hill, J. D., IVAD Study Group, (2007). Results of a multicenter clinical trial with the Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist Device. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133: 1573-1580 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Asai, T., Lee, M.-H., Arrecubieta, C., von Bayern, M. P., Cespedes, C. A., Baron, H. M., Cadeiras, M., Sakaguchi, T., Marboe, C. C., Naka, Y., Deng, M. C., Lowy, F. D. (2007). Cellular coating of the left ventricular assist device textured polyurethane membrane reduces adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133: 1147-1153 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Friedrich, E. B, Bohm, M. (2007). MANAGEMENT OF END STAGE HEART FAILURE. Heart 93: 626-631 [Full Text]  
• Sartipy, U., Albage, A., Lindblom, D. (2007). Improved Health-Related Quality of Life and Functional Status After Surgical Ventricular Restoration. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83: 1381-1387 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jugdutt, B. I., Butler, C. (2007). Ventricular Unloading, Tissue Angiotensin II, Matrix Modulation, and Function During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support. J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 1175-1177 [Full Text]  
• Zimpfer, D., Zrunek, P., Roethy, W., Czerny, M., Schima, H., Huber, L., Grimm, M., Rajek, A., Wolner, E., Wieselthaler, G. (2007). Left ventricular assist devices decrease fixed pulmonary hypertension in cardiac transplant candidates. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133: 689-695 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Feller, E. D., Sorensen, E. N., Haddad, M., Pierson, R. N., Johnson, F. L., Brown, J. M., Griffith, B. P. (2007). Clinical Outcomes Are Similar in Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83: 1082-1088 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hall, J. L., Birks, E. J., Grindle, S., Cullen, M. E., Barton, P. J., Rider, J. E., Lee, S., Harwalker, S., Mariash, A., Adhikari, N., Charles, N. J., Felkin, L. E., Polster, S., George, R. S., Miller, L. W., Yacoub, M. H. (2007). Molecular signature of recovery following combination left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and pharmacologic therapy. Eur Heart J 28: 613-627 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Large, S. (2007). Surgery for heart failure. Heart 93: 392-402 [Full Text]  
• Travis, A. R., Giridharan, G. A., Pantalos, G. M., Dowling, R. D., Prabhu, S. D., Slaughter, M. S., Sobieski, M., Undar, A., Farrar, D. J., Koenig, S. C. (2007). Vascular pulsatility in patients with a pulsatile- or continuous-flow ventricular assist device. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133: 517-524 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wohlschlaeger, J., Schmitz, K. J., Palatty, J., Takeda, A., Takeda, N., Vahlhaus, C., Levkau, B., Stypmann, J., Schmid, C., Schmid, K. W., Baba, H. A. (2007). Roles of cyclooxygenase-2 and phosphorylated Akt ( T hr308) in cardiac hypertrophy regression mediated by left-ventricular unloading. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133: 37-43 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Large, S. (2007). Invited commentary. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83: 282-282 [Full Text]  
• Nanas, J. N., Matsouka, C., Karageorgopoulos, D., Leonti, A., Tsolakis, E., Drakos, S. G., Tsagalou, E. P., Maroulidis, G. D., Alexopoulos, G. P., Kanakakis, J. E., Anastasiou-Nana, M. I. (2006). Etiology of Anemia in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 48: 2485-2489 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Clegg, A. J., Scott, D. A., Loveman, E., Colquitt, J. L., Royle, P., Bryant, J. (2006). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation for people with end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Eur Heart J 27: 2929-2938 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bugger, H., Leippert, S., Blum, D., Kahle, P., Barleon, B., Marme, D., Doenst, T. (2006). Subtractive hybridization for differential gene expression in mechanically unloaded rat heart. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 291: H2714-H2722 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Skali, H., Pfeffer, M. A., Lubsen, J., Solomon, S. D. (2006). Variable Impact of Combining Fatal and Nonfatal End Points in Heart Failure Trials. Circulation 114: 2298-2303 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Russo, M. J., Chen, J. M., Hong, K. N., Stewart, A. S., Ascheim, D. D., Argenziano, M., Mancini, D. M., Oz, M. C., Naka, Y., the Columbia University Heart Transplant Outcomes, (2006). Survival After Heart Transplantation Is Not Diminished Among Recipients With Uncomplicated Diabetes Mellitus: An Analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database. Circulation 114: 2280-2287 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Birks, E. J., Tansley, P. D., Hardy, J., George, R. S., Bowles, C. T., Burke, M., Banner, N. R., Khaghani, A., Yacoub, M. H. (2006). Left Ventricular Assist Device and Drug Therapy for the Reversal of Heart Failure. NEJM 355: 1873-1884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Renlund, D. G., Kfoury, A. G. (2006). When the Failing, End-Stage Heart Is Not End-Stage. NEJM 355: 1922-1925 [Full Text]  
• Christiansen, S., Autschbach, R. (2006). Doxorubicin in experimental and clinical heart failure.. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 30: 611-616 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pagani, F. D., Long, J. W., Dembitsky, W. P., Joyce, L. D., Miller, L. W. (2006). Improved Mechanical Reliability of the HeartMate XVE Left Ventricular Assist System.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 82: 1413-1418 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Toyama, M., Usui, A., Abe, T., Oshima, H., Akita, T., Ueda, Y. (2006). Mitral Valve Surgery for Dilated Cardiomyopathy with Mitral Regurgitation. Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 14: 371-376 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shah, K. B., Inoue, Y., Mehra, M. R. (2006). Amyloidosis and the heart: a comprehensive review.. Arch Intern Med 166: 1805-1813 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chen, E., Sapirstein, W., Ahn, C., Swain, J., Zuckerman, B. (2006). FDA perspective on clinical trial design for cardiovascular devices.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 82: 773-775 [Full Text]  
• Cohn, L. H. (2006). Evidence-based cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 132: 457-458 [Full Text]  
• Dembitsky, W. P. (2006). REMATCH and Beyond: The Cost of Treating Heart Failure Using an Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device.. SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 10: 253-255 [Abstract]  
• Parides, M. K., Moskowitz, A. J., Ascheim, D. D., Rose, E. A., Gelijns, A. C. (2006). Progress versus precision: challenges in clinical trial design for left ventricular assist devices.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 82: 1140-1146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Crespo-Leiro, M. G., Cuenca-Castillo, J. J. (2006). Surgical treatment of heart failure: heart transplantation and ventricular restoration surgery. Eur Heart J Suppl 8: E39-E42 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Santambrogio, L., Bianchi, T., Fuardo, M., Gazzoli, F., Veronesi, R., Braschi, A., Maurelli, M. (2006). Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device insertion: preoperative risk factors. ICVTS 5: 379-382 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Westaby, S., Frazier, O.H., Banning, A. (2006). Six years of continuous mechanical circulatory support.. NEJM 355: 325-327 [Full Text]  
• Lima, B., Rajagopal, K., Petersen, R. P., Shah, A. S., Soule, B., Felker, G. M., Rogers, J. G., Lodge, A. J., Milano, C. A. (2006). Marginal Cardiac Allografts Do Not Have Increased Primary Graft Dysfunction in Alternate List Transplantation. Circulation 114: I-27-I-32 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blume, E. D., Naftel, D. C., Bastardi, H. J., Duncan, B. W., Kirklin, J. K., Webber, S. A., for the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study Investiga, (2006). Outcomes of Children Bridged to Heart Transplantation With Ventricular Assist Devices: A Multi-Institutional Study. Circulation 113: 2313-2319 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Petrucci, R. J., Truesdell, K. C., Carter, A., Goldstein, N. E., Russell, M. M., Dilkes, D., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Thomas, C. E., Keenan, M. E., Lazarus, L. A., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Trunzo, J. J., Verjans, J. W., Holmes, E. C., Samuels, L. E., Narula, J. (2006). Cognitive dysfunction in advanced heart failure and prospective cardiac assist device patients.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 81: 1738-1744 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Siegenthaler, M. P., Frazier, O.H., Beyersdorf, F., Martin, J., Laks, H., Elefteriades, J., Khaghani, A., Kjellman, U., Koul, B., Pepper, J., Jarvik, R., Westaby, S. (2006). Mechanical reliability of the jarvik 2000 heart.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 81: 1752-1759 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stevenson, L. W., Lewis, E. (2006). Mapping the Journey. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 1612-1614 [Full Text]  
• Williams, J., Conte, J. (2006). Ventricular assist device placement following surgical ventricular restoration. ICVTS 5: 90-91 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Felker, G. M., Rogers, J. G. (2006). Same Bridge, New Destinations: Rethinking Paradigms for Mechanical Cardiac Support in Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 930-932 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hauptman, P. J. (2006). Palliation in heart failure: When less and more are more. AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 23: 150-152  
• Padalino, M. A., Ohye, R. G., Chang, A. C., Gajarski, R. J., Bove, E. L., Devaney, E. J. (2006). Bridge to Transplant Using the MicroMed DeBakey Ventricular Assist Device in a Child with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 81: 1118-1121 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stevenson, L. W., Le Jemtel, T. H., Alt, E. U., Stevenson, L. W., Le Jemtel, T. H., Alt, E. U. (2006). Hemodynamic Goals Are Relevant. Circulation 113: 1020-1033 [Full Text]  
• Pennington, D. G. (2006). The Impact of New Technology on Cardiothoracic Surgical Practice. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 81: 10-18 [Full Text]  
• Aranda, J. M. Jr, Woo, G. W., Schofield, R. S., Handberg, E. M., Hill, J. A., Curtis, A. B., Sears, S. F., Goff, J. S., Pauly, D. F., Conti, J. B. (2005). Management of Heart Failure After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Integrating Advanced Heart Failure Treatment With Optimal Device Function. J Am Coll Cardiol 46: 2193-2198 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhang, J., Heitjan, D. F (2005). Nonignorable censoring in randomized clinical trials. Clin Trials 2: 488-496 [Abstract]  
• Potapov, E. V., Weng, Y., Drews, T., Jurmann, M., Hetzer, R. (2005). Longest Time of Support by the Novacor Left Ventricular Assist Device Without Pump Exchange. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 80: 2421-2421 [Full Text]  
• Wohlschlaeger, J., Schmitz, K. J., Schmid, C., Schmid, K. W., Keul, P., Takeda, A., Weis, S., Levkau, B., Baba, H. A. (2005). Reverse remodeling following insertion of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD): A review of the morphological and molecular changes. Cardiovasc Res 68: 376-386 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Konstam, M. A., Czerska, B., Bohm, M., Oren, R. M., Sadowski, J., Khanal, S., Abraham, W. T., Wasler, A., Dahm, J. B., Gavazzi, A., Gradinac, S., Legrand, V., Mohacsi, P., Poelzl, G., Radovancevic, B., Van Bakel, A. B., Zile, M. R., Cabuay, B., Bartus, K., Jansen, P. (2005). Continuous Aortic Flow Augmentation: A Pilot Study of Hemodynamic and Renal Responses to a Novel Percutaneous Intervention in Decompensated Heart Failure. Circulation 112: 3107-3114 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ootaki, Y., Kamohara, K., Akiyama, M., Zahr, F., Kopcak, M. W. Jr., Dessoffy, R., Fukamachi, K. (2005). Phasic coronary blood flow pattern during a continuous flow left ventricular assist support. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 28: 711-716 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dang, N. C., Topkara, V. K., Kim, B. T., Mercando, M. L., Kay, J., Naka, Y. (2005). Clinical outcomes in patients with chronic congestive heart failure who undergo left ventricular assist device implantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 130: 1302-1309 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• The ESCAPE Investigators and ESCAPE Study Coordina, (2005). Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness: The ESCAPE Trial. JAMA 294: 1625-1633 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yuh, D. D., Albaugh, M., Ullrich, S., Conte, J. V. (2005). Treatment of Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infection With Vacuum-Assisted Closure System. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 80: 1493-1495 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wilhelm, M. J., Hammel, D., Schmid, C., Rhode, A., Kaan, T., Rothenburger, M., Stypmann, J., Schafers, M., Schmidt, C., Baba, H. A., Scheld, H. H. (2005). Long-term support of 9 patients with the DeBakey VAD for more than 200 days. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 130: 1122-1129 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• El-Magharbel, I. (2005). Ventricular Assist Devices and Anesthesia. SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 9: 241-249 [Abstract]