The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 345:417-423 August 9, 2001 Number 6
NextNext

Cerebral Sinovenous Thrombosis in Children
Gabrielle deVeber, M.D., Maureen Andrew, M.D., Coleen Adams, M.B., Bruce Bjornson, M.D., Frances Booth, M.D., David J. Buckley, M.B., Ch.B., Carol S. Camfield, M.D., Michele David, M.D., Peter Humphreys, M.D., Pierre Langevin, M.D., E. Athen MacDonald, M.D., Brandon Meaney, M.D., Michael Shevell, M.D., C.M., D. Barry Sinclair, M.D., Jerome Yager, M.D., Jane Gillett, M.D., for the Canadian Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Study Group

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children is a serious disorder, and information is needed about its prevention and treatment.

Methods The Canadian Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Registry was initiated in 1992 at the 16 pediatric tertiary care centers in Canada. Children (newborn to 18 years of age) with symptoms and radiographic confirmation of sinovenous thrombosis were included.

Results During the first six years of the registry, 160 consecutive children with sinovenous thrombosis were enrolled, and the incidence of the disorder was 0.67 case per 100,000 children per year. Neonates were most commonly affected. Fifty-eight percent of the children had seizures, 76 percent had diffuse neurologic signs, and 42 percent had focal neurologic signs. Risk factors included head and neck disorders (in 29 percent), acute systemic illnesses (in 54 percent), chronic systemic diseases (in 36 percent), and prothrombotic states (in 41 percent). Venous infarcts occurred in 41 percent of the children. Fifty-three percent of the children received antithrombotic agents. Neurologic deficits were present in 38 percent of the children, and 8 percent died; half the deaths were due to sinovenous thrombosis. Predictors of adverse neurologic outcomes were seizures at presentation and venous infarcts.

Conclusions Sinovenous thrombosis in children affects primarily neonates and results in neurologic impairment or death in approximately half the cases. The occurrence of venous infarcts or seizures portends a poor outcome.


Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children is a rare disorder but one that is increasingly diagnosed because of greater clinical awareness, sensitive neuroimaging techniques, and the survival of children with previously lethal diseases that confer a predisposition to sinovenous thrombosis.1,2,3 The literature on sinovenous thrombosis in children consists only of case reports and analyses of small case series.4,5,6,7,8,9,10 Extrapolating the results of studies of adults to children is of limited value because of large age-related differences in the hemostatic, vascular, and neurologic systems. An understanding of the epidemiology of sinovenous thrombosis in children is necessary to define critical clinical settings and develop interventional strategies. The Canadian Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Registry was established to obtain comprehensive prospective epidemiologic data on stroke, including sinovenous thrombosis, in children.

Methods

Patients

All 16 pediatric tertiary care centers in Canada participated in the registry. Children from birth (with a gestational age of more than 36 weeks) to 18 years of age were eligible for the study if they had radiologically confirmed sinovenous thrombosis. The children were classified as neonates (less than 1 month old) or nonneonates (1 month to 18 years old). A neurologist at each center maintained a prospective list of consecutive children with objectively diagnosed sinovenous thrombosis. A research nurse visited each center at regular intervals, checked the completeness of patient identification by searching the medical-records data base for discharge diagnoses, with the use of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for sinovenous thrombosis (437.6 and 325),11 and filled out standardized data-collection forms. The data were entered into a central data base, reviewed for inaccuracies, missing data, and inconsistencies, and corrected according to a review of medical records and discussions with the site investigators. The institutional research-ethics board at each institution approved the study. Data on children with sinovenous thrombosis who were enrolled in the registry between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1997, are included in this report.

In a substudy, performed to assess the completeness of the ascertainment of cases, the Canadian data base for health information was searched for cases of sinovenous thrombosis in children during the study period, with the use of the same ICD-9 codes for sinovenous thrombosis. Cases in Ontario, the province with the largest population, were matched to those in the registry.

Clinical Features

Basic demographic information was recorded, as well as neurologic manifestations of sinovenous thrombosis, which were classified as seizures, diffuse neurologic signs, and focal neurologic signs.

Risk Factors

Findings that were recorded as risk factors included disorders of the head and neck (including local infection), acute systemic illness, chronic systemic disease, and prothrombotic disorders. Standard assays for prothrombotic disorders were used at each center, including activity assays for antithrombin, protein C, protein S, and the lupus anticoagulant; immunologic assays for anticardiolipin antibody; and molecular assays for the presence of factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene.

Radiologic Evaluation

Sinovenous thrombosis was confirmed by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with or without magnetic resonance venography (MRV), conventional angiography, or transfontanel power Doppler ultrasonography. The results of MRI, with the results of MRV when available, were compared with the results of CT or those of power Doppler ultrasonography when both sets of data were available.

The location of the thrombosis was classified as superficial or deep. The presence and nature of parenchymal lesions were noted. Infarcts were classified as nonhemorrhagic or hemorrhagic. Extraparenchymal hemorrhages were classified as subdural, subarachnoid, or intraventricular.

Treatment

The use of antithrombotic agents, other medical therapies, and surgery was recorded. Overt clinical bleeding requiring transfusion therapy, bleeding viewed as excessive and prompting the cessation of anticoagulant therapy, and confirmed bleeding into the central nervous system were considered to be major episodes of bleeding. Recurrent thrombosis was defined as a confirmed thrombotic event within or outside the central nervous system.

Neurologic Outcome

The neurologic outcome, based on the assessment at the last follow-up visit, was classified as normal (no neurologic deficits) or abnormal (one or more neurologic deficits). Neurologic deficits and death due to sinovenous thrombosis were classified as adverse outcomes. Seizures were classified as adverse outcomes only if they occurred after discharge from the acute care hospital and were treated with anticonvulsant agents.

Statistical Analysis

The incidence of sinovenous thrombosis was calculated on the basis of the Canadian population of persons 18 years of age or younger.12 The following variables were tabulated: patient enrollment in each province, age at the time of presentation, sex, neurologic manifestations, risk factors, radiologic findings, treatment, adverse outcomes, and cause of death.

Statistical analyses were performed with the use of Stat-View 5.1.13 Univariate analyses were performed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data and with Student's t-test for continuous data. Potentially important differences between neonates and nonneonates were tested for each of the variables noted above. Univariate analyses were also performed to identify predictors of an adverse outcome; variables included in these analyses were age, sex, presence or absence of seizures, presence or absence of infarcts, location of thrombosis, involvement of single or multiple sinuses, and presence or absence of treatment with antithrombotic agents. Multivariate analyses were planned if more than three variables were found to be significantly associated with an adverse outcome (P<0.05) in the univariate analyses.

Results

Patients

A total of 160 consecutive children with sinovenous thrombosis were enrolled in the registry: 69 neonates and 91 nonneonates. The geographic distribution of the patients reflected that of the general population in Canada, with Ontario having the largest number of patients (52 percent). The substudy showed that the registry included 97 percent of the children who were classified as having an ICD-9 code for sinovenous thrombosis in the Ontario health-information data base. The incidence of sinovenous thrombosis was 0.67 case per 100,000 children per year (95 percent confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.76). Information was available for more than 95 percent of the children unless otherwise indicated.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Forty-three percent of the children were neonates, and 54 percent were less than one year old (Figure 1); 54 percent were male and 46 percent were female. Seizures were more common and both focal and diffuse neurologic signs less common in neonates than in nonneonates (Table 1).


View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Age Distribution among 160 Children with Sinovenous Thrombosis.

The portion of the first bar below the horizontal line indicates infants less than one month old.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Neurologic Manifestations of Sinovenous Thrombosis in 160 Children.

 
Risk Factors

Risk factors were present in all but four patients (2 percent) and were related to age (Table 2). Acute systemic illnesses were present in 84 percent of neonates; the most frequent illnesses were perinatal complications (in 51 percent) and dehydration (in 30 percent). The perinatal complications included hypoxia at birth (in 30 cases), premature rupture of membranes (in 4), maternal infection (in 4), placental abruption (in 2), and gestational diabetes (in 2). Head and neck disorders were common in nonneonates (38 percent), and in both neonates and nonneonates, the majority of these disorders (61 percent) were infections. Chronic systemic diseases were also common in nonneonates (present in 60 percent) and were diverse in nature.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Risk Factors for Sinovenous Thrombosis.

 
Tests for prothrombotic disorders were performed in 123 of the 160 patients (77 percent), of whom 39 (32 percent) had abnormal results. The most frequent abnormality was the presence of anticardiolipin antibody (in 10 children), with IgG titers ranging from 15 to 60 IgG phospholipid units per milliliter. Other abnormalities included decreased levels of protein C (in nine children), antithrombin (in seven), protein S (in five), fibrinogen (in two), and plasminogen (in one) and the presence of a lupus anticoagulant (in four), factor V Leiden (in three), and the G20210A prothrombin-gene mutation (in one). The deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S were in many cases caused by an acquired disorder such as liver disease, the nephrotic syndrome, or disseminated intravascular coagulation. Procoagulant drugs were given to 14 children: 11 received asparaginase, and 3 received oral contraceptives.

Radiologic Findings

CT was performed in 153 children (96 percent), MRI with or without MRV in 114 (71 percent), and conventional angiography in 13 (8 percent), with power Doppler ultrasonography in 12 neonates (8 percent). Among the 104 children who underwent CT and MRI, CT did not reveal sinovenous thrombosis in 17 children (16 percent). Power Doppler ultrasonography detected sinovenous thrombosis in 10 of the 12 neonates who underwent both power Doppler ultrasonography and MRI.

Figure 2 shows the structures that were most frequently involved. The location of the thrombosis was superficial in 137 children (86 percent) and deep in 60 (38 percent), with no significant differences between neonates and nonneonates (Table 3). Multiple sinuses were involved in 78 children (49 percent). The lateral sinus was more frequently involved in nonneonates than in neonates (60 percent vs. 39 percent) (P=0.01).


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Lateral View of the Cerebral Sinovenous System.

The structures that are most susceptible to sinovenous thrombosis in children are shown, with the relative frequency of involvement given in parentheses. A patient may have multiple sites of involvement.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Location of Thrombosis.

 
Cerebral parenchymal infarcts were present in 66 children (41 percent): 29 neonates and 37 nonneonates. The infarcts were nonhemorrhagic in 21 of the 66 children and hemorrhagic in 45. Twenty-four neonates (35 percent) had hemorrhagic infarcts, as compared with 21 nonneonates (23 percent, P=0.05). Parenchymal lesions other than infarcts were present in 11 children; the lesions included brain tumors, arteriovenous malformations, and multifocal white-matter lesions. Extraparenchymal hemorrhage was present in 14 children (9 percent).

Treatment

Antithrombotic therapy was given to 85 children (53 percent): 25 neonates (36 percent) and 60 nonneonates (66 percent) (Table 4). Most children were treated for three months, and none died or had neurologic deterioration because of hemorrhagic complications. Fifty-one neonates (74 percent) required anticonvulsant therapy, as compared with 38 nonneonates (42 percent). Surgical procedures, performed in 21 children (13 percent), consisted of mastoidectomy and shunt placement.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Type of Treatment.

 
Outcome

The neurologic outcome could be assessed in 143 children (89 percent): 61 of 69 neonates (88 percent) and 82 of 91 nonneonates (90 percent). The mean interval from thrombosis to the last follow-up visit was 1.6 years (range, 0.05 to 5.2). Of these 143 children, 77 (54 percent) were normal, 54 (38 percent) had neurologic deficits, and 12 (8 percent) had died. The neurologic deficits were motor impairment in 80 percent of cases, cognitive impairment in 10 percent, developmental delay in 9 percent, speech impairment in 6 percent, visual impairment in 6 percent, and other impairments in 26 percent. Of the 12 deaths, 6 were attributable to sinovenous thrombosis and the remainder were attributable to other associated diseases. Predictors of adverse neurologic outcomes included seizures at presentation in nonneonates (P=0.02) and the presence of infarcts (nonhemorrhagic or hemorrhagic) in neonates and nonneonates (P=0.03). Seizures were present at follow-up in 12 neonates (20 percent) and 9 nonneonates (11 percent, P=0.22). Nineteen children (13 percent) had symptomatic recurrent thrombosis: 5 neonates (8 percent) and 14 nonneonates (17 percent, P=0.19). Recurrent thrombosis was cerebral in 12 children and noncerebral in 7.

Discussion

The Canadian Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Registry was the source of the data for this large, population-based study of the epidemiology of sinovenous thrombosis during childhood. The incidence of sinovenous thrombosis was 0.67 case per 100,000 children per year, and neonates were the most commonly affected age group. There were age-related differences in the neurologic manifestations of sinovenous thrombosis, and specific risk factors were identified, including head and neck infections and prothrombotic states. Venous infarcts and the occurrence of seizures predicted a poor neurologic outcome.

The registry data pose several methodologic issues that need to be addressed. First, a potential limitation of the data is bias in case ascertainment. Our substudy, however, showed that the registry data accounted for 97 percent of children with sinovenous thrombosis in Ontario, where the majority of the patients lived. Second, the patient cohort was divided into neonates and nonneonates rather than into patients with septic and those with nonseptic sinovenous thrombosis, which is the conventional classification. The validity of the registry classification was supported by the striking differences between the neonatal and nonneonatal groups, and analyses of the registry data according to the presence or absence of sepsis did not reveal any significant differences (data not shown).

Third, testing for prothrombotic disorders was not required, and neither factor V Leiden nor the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene had been discovered in the early years of the registry. However, 77 percent of the children were tested, and the results were similar to those in smaller studies in which consecutive children were tested.14,15 Fourth, one of the limitations of any registry is a lack of standardized data on the long-term outcome. Despite this limitation, data on the neurologic outcome were available for 89 percent of the children in the Canadian registry, and the findings were similar to those in a smaller, hospital-based cohort study.16

The main neurologic manifestations of sinovenous thrombosis in the nonneonates in our study were similar to those reported in adults17: a decreased level of consciousness, headache, focal neurologic signs such as hemiparesis, and cranial-nerve palsies. In contrast, the primary neurologic manifestations in the neonates were seizures and diffuse neurologic signs. The increased frequency of seizures in this group may reflect the general propensity of infants to have seizures. The frequency of seizures and diffuse neurologic signs means that clinicians must have a high index of suspicion for sinovenous thrombosis in neonates.

The risk factors for sinovenous thrombosis in our study were age dependent, were frequently multiple, and were often different from those reported in adults.17,18 Perinatal complications, of which hypoxic encephalopathy was most common, predominated in the neonates. Head and neck infections, such as otitis media, mastoiditis, and sinusitis, predominated in preschool children, whereas chronic diseases such as connective-tissue disorders were more frequent in older children. Risk factors that are common in adults, such as pregnancy,19 cancer,20,21 and use of oral contraceptives,22 were rare in our study. Idiopathic sinovenous thrombosis represented only 3 percent of cases, as compared with an estimated 10 to 25 percent of cases in adults.17

Prothrombotic states may cause or contribute to sinovenous thrombosis in both adults and children. In adults, the frequency of prothrombotic disorders is 15 to 21 percent; the G20210A prothrombin-gene mutation and the presence of factor V Leiden are the most common genetic disorders.23,24,25 In children with sinovenous thrombosis, the frequency of prothrombotic disorders is 12 to 50 percent, and the presence of anticardiolipin antibody is the most common acquired disorder.14,15,26,27,28,29,30 In our study, 32 percent of the children who underwent testing for prothrombotic disorders had at least one abnormality; the presence of anticardiolipin antibody was the most common acquired disorder, and the presence of factor V Leiden was the most common genetic disorder. Other prothrombotic disorders were due to underlying diseases. Whether acquired prothrombotic disorders cause sinovenous thrombosis in children or are merely associated with it remains to be determined.

The registry offered a unique opportunity to compare the accuracy of the various radiographic tests used to diagnose sinovenous thrombosis in children. Although CT scans were obtained in 96 percent of the children, they detected the disorder in only 84 percent of the children who also underwent MRI with MRV. Previous studies have suggested that CT scans may also have false positive results in neonates because of an increased hematocrit, a decreased density of unmyelinated white matter, and slower venous flow — factors that may result in radiographic findings that mimic the dense-triangle sign.31 Transfontanel power Doppler ultrasonography is a powerful tool for the noninvasive diagnosis and monitoring of neonatal sinovenous thrombosis.32 At this time, the optimal technique for establishing the diagnosis in children is MRI with MRV.

The use of anticoagulant therapy in adults with sinovenous thrombosis is based on data from four clinical trials that showed an improved neurologic outcome with this treatment.33,34,35,36 The extrapolation of these results to children with sinovenous thrombosis, particularly neonates, is problematic, because the ratio of efficacy to safety may differ from that in adults. The registry data show that anticoagulants are frequently used in children with sinovenous thrombosis, especially in nonneonates (66 percent). Although the potential benefit of anticoagulants in children with sinovenous thrombosis cannot be determined from the registry data, the results of our study suggest that anticoagulant therapy is not associated with serious hemorrhage in selected patients and that such therapy warrants further evaluation, particularly in neonates.

The long-term neurologic outcome of sinovenous thrombosis in children is unclear.9,10 The best available estimate is that after a mean of 2.1 years, 77 percent of neonates and 52 percent of nonneonates are neurologically normal.16 Our findings are consistent with those estimates. Long-term follow-up of affected children is very important, especially in neonates, since the onset of signs of neurologic injury is delayed in this age group. Given the increasing incidence of sinovenous thrombosis in children, the variations in treatment, and the adverse outcomes in half the children with this disorder, studies are needed to identify more effective immediate and secondary preventive therapies.

Supported by grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario (NA4107) and the Bloorview Children's Hospital Foundation. Dr. deVeber is the recipient of a Stroke Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. Dr. Andrew is the recipient of a Career Scientist Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

* Other members of the study group are listed in the Appendix.


Source Information

From the Divisions of Neurology (G.D.) and Hematology–Oncology (M.A.), the Population Health Sciences Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto (G.D., M.A.); the Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (C.A.); the Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (F.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Memorial University, St. John's, Nfld. (D.J.B.); the Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (C.S.C.); the Department of Hematology–Oncology, Université de Montreal, Montreal (M.D.); the Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (P.H.); the Department of Pediatric Neurology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Que. (P.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (E.A.M.); and the Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Ontario, London (J.G.) — all in Canada.

Other authors were Brandon Meaney, M.D. (Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.), Michael Shevell, M.D., C.M. (Department of Neurology, Pediatrics, and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal), D. Barry Sinclair, M.D. (Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton), and Jerome Yager, M.D. (Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon).

Address reprint requests to Dr. deVeber at the Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.

References

  1. Medlock MD, Olivero WC, Hanigan WC, Wright RM, Winek SJ. Children with cerebral venous thrombosis diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography. Neurosurgery 1992;31:870-876. [ISI][Medline]
  2. Yuh WT, Simonson TM, Wang AM, et al. Venous sinus occlusive disease: MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:309-316. [Abstract]
  3. Casey SO, Alberico RA, Patel M, et al. Cerebral CT venography. Radiology 1996;198:163-170. [Abstract]
  4. Scotti LN, Goldman RL, Hardman DR, Heinz ER. Venous thrombosis in infants and children. Radiology 1974;112:393-399. [Medline]
  5. Rao KC, Knipp HC, Wagner EJ. Computed tomographic findings in cerebral sinus and venous thrombosis. Radiology 1981;140:391-398. [Abstract]
  6. Lee BC, Voorhies TM, Ehrlich ME, Lipper E, Auld PA, Vannucci RC. Digital intravenous cerebral angiography in neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1984;5:281-286. [Abstract]
  7. Justich E, Lammer J, Fritsch G, Beitzke A, Walter GF. CT diagnosis of thrombosis of dural sinuses in childhood. Eur J Radiol 1984;4:294-295. [Medline]
  8. Baram TZ, Butler IJ, Nelson MD Jr, McArdle CB. Transverse sinus thrombosis in newborns: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Ann Neurol 1988;24:792-794. [Medline]
  9. Shevell MI, Silver K, O'Gorman AM, Watters GV, Montes JL. Neonatal dural sinus thrombosis. Pediatr Neurol 1989;5:161-165. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Barron TF, Gusnard DA, Zimmerman RA, Clancy RR. Cerebral venous thrombosis in neonates and children. Pediatr Neurol 1992;8:112-116. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. International classification of diseases, 9th rev., clinical modification: ICD-9-CM. 5th ed. 1997 Hospital ed. Los Angeles: Practice Management Information, 1996.
  12. Statistics Canada. CANSIM. (Accessed July 18, 2001, at http://www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/People/Population/demo10a.htm.)
  13. Stat-view, version 5.1. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute, 1998 (software).
  14. deVeber G, Monagle P, Chan A, et al. Prothrombotic disorders in infants and children with cerebral thromboembolism. Arch Neurol 1998;55:1539-1543. [Free Full Text]
  15. Bonduel M, Sciuccati G, Hepner M, Torres AF, Pieroni G, Frontroth JP. Prethrombotic disorders in children with arterial ischemic stroke and sinovenous thrombosis. Arch Neurol 1999;56:967-971. [Free Full Text]
  16. deVeber GA, MacGregor D, Curtis R, Mayank S. Neurologic outcome in survivors of childhood arterial ischemic stroke and sinovenous thrombosis. J Child Neurol 2000;15:316-324. [Free Full Text]
  17. Bousser M-G, Russell RR. Cerebral venous thrombosis. Vol. 33 of Major problems in neurology. London: W.B. Saunders, 1997.
  18. Einhäupl KM, Villringer A, Haberl RL, et al. Clinical spectrum of sinus venous thrombosis. In: Einhäupl K, Kempski O, Baethmann A, eds. Cerebral sinus thrombosis: experimental and clinical aspects. New York: Plenum Press, 1990:149-55.
  19. Cantu C, Barinagarrementeria F. Cerebral venous thrombosis associated with pregnancy and puerperium: review of 67 cases. Stroke 1993;24:1880-1884. [Abstract]
  20. Hickey WF, Garnick MB, Henderson IC, Dawson DM. Primary cerebral venous thrombosis in patients with cancer -- a rarely diagnosed paraneoplastic syndrome: report of three cases and review of the literature. Am J Med 1982;73:740-750. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  21. Brown MT, Friedman HS, Oakes WJ, Boyko OB, Schold SC Jr. Sagittal sinus thrombosis and leptomeningeal medulloblastoma. Neurology 1991;41:455-456. [Free Full Text]
  22. Dindar F, Platts ME. Intracranial venous thrombosis complicating oral contraception. Can Med Assoc J 1974;111:545-548. [Medline]
  23. Deschiens MA, Conard J, Horellou MH, et al. Coagulation studies, factor V Leiden, and anticardiolipin antibodies in 40 cases of cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 1996;27:1724-1730. [Free Full Text]
  24. Martinelli I, Sacchi E, Landi G, Taioli E, Duca F, Mannucci PM. High risk of cerebral-vein thrombosis in carriers of a prothrombin-gene mutation and in users of oral contraceptives. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1793-1797. [Free Full Text]
  25. Zuber M, Toulon P, Marnet L, Mas JL. Factor V Leiden mutation in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 1996;27:1721-1723. [Free Full Text]
  26. Prats J, Garaizar C, Zuazo E, Lopez J, Pinan MA, Aragues P. Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis in a child with protein S deficiency. Neurology 1992;42:2303-2305.
  27. Rich C, Gill JC, Wernick S, Konkol RJ. An unusual cause of cerebral venous thrombosis in a four-year-old child. Stroke 1993;24:603-605. [Abstract]
  28. van Kuijck MA, Rotteveel JJ, van Oostrom CG, Novakova I. Neurological complications in children with protein C deficiency. Neuropediatrics 1994;25:16-19. [ISI][Medline]
  29. Uziel Y, Laxer RM, Blaser S, Andrew M, Schneider R, Silverman ED. Cerebral vein thrombosis in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus. J Pediatr 1995;126:722-727. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  30. von Scheven E, Athreya BH, Rose CD, Goldsmith DP, Morton L. Clinical characteristics of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in children. J Pediatr 1996;129:339-345. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  31. Ludwig B, Brand M, Brockerhoff P. Postpartum CT examination of the heads of full term infants. Neuroradiology 1980;20:145-154. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  32. Bezinque SL, Slovis TL, Touchette AS, et al. Characterization of superior sagittal sinus blood flow velocity using color flow Doppler in neonates and infants. Pediatr Radiol 1995;25:175-179. [Medline]
  33. Einhaupl KM, Villringer A, Meister W, et al. Heparin treatment in sinus venous thrombosis. Lancet 1991;338:597-600. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  34. Maiti B, Chakrabarti I. Study on cerebral venous thrombosis with special reference to efficacy of heparin. J Neurol Sci 1997;150:Suppl:S147-S147.abstract 
  35. Nagaraja D, Haridas T, Taly AB, Veerendrakumar M, SubbuKrishna DK. Puerperal cerebral venous thrombosis: therapeutic benefit of low dose heparin. Neurol India 1999;47:43-46. [Medline]
  36. de Bruijn SF, Stam J. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of anticoagulant treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin for cerebral sinus thrombosis. Stroke 1999;30:484-488. [Free Full Text]
Appendix

The following investigators also participated in the study: CanadaAlberta: S. Lee, B. Prieur; British Columbia: S. Kent, J.A.R. Tibbles; Manitoba: P.J. McCusker; Newfoundland: S. Penney; New Brunswick: D.C. Meek; Nova Scotia: E. Woods; Ontario: M. Adams, A.K.C. Chan, S.N. Christie, R.M. Curtis, T. Domi, M.P. Flavin, L.F. Jardine, J.A. Julian, D.L. Keene, S. Lanthier, D.L. MacGregor, S. Mayank, L. Mitchell, J. Tu, L. Wylie; Quebec: B.G. Lemieux; Australia — P. Monagle.


 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.