The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 345:663-668 August 30, 2001 Number 9
NextNext

Mortality among Patients Admitted to Hospitals on Weekends as Compared with Weekdays
Chaim M. Bell, M.D., and Donald A. Redelmeier, M.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Halm, E. A.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The level of staffing in hospitals is often lower on weekends than on weekdays, despite a presumably consistent day-to-day burden of disease. It is uncertain whether in-hospital mortality rates among patients with serious conditions differ according to whether they are admitted on a weekend or on a weekday.

Methods We analyzed all acute care admissions from emergency departments in Ontario, Canada, between 1988 and 1997 (a total of 3,789,917 admissions). We compared in-hospital mortality among patients admitted on a weekend with that among patients admitted on a weekday for three prespecified diseases: ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (5454 admissions), acute epiglottitis (1139), and pulmonary embolism (11,686) and for three control diseases: myocardial infarction (160,220), intracerebral hemorrhage (10,987), and acute hip fracture (59,670), as well as for the 100 conditions that were the most common causes of death (accounting for 1,820,885 admissions).

Results Weekend admissions were associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality rates than were weekday admissions among patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (42 percent vs. 36 percent, P<0.001), acute epiglottitis (1.7 percent vs. 0.3 percent, P=0.04), and pulmonary embolism (13 percent vs. 11 percent, P=0.009). The differences in mortality persisted for all three diagnoses after adjustment for age, sex, and coexisting disorders. There were no significant differences in mortality between weekday and weekend admissions for the three control diagnoses. Weekend admissions were also associated with significantly higher mortality rates for 23 of the 100 leading causes of death and were not associated with significantly lower mortality rates for any of these conditions.

Conclusions Patients with some serious medical conditions are more likely to die in the hospital if they are admitted on a weekend than if they are admitted on a weekday.


Staffing levels in acute care hospitals tend to be lower on weekends than on weekdays. The reduction in clinical personnel on weekends may lead to shortfalls in care, since the incidence of many medical emergencies is similar from day to day.1,2 Such staffing patterns may explain, in part, why surges in population-wide deaths on weekends are common in industrialized countries.3,4,5

Data from a few clinical studies suggest that hospitals function less effectively on weekends than on weekdays. Neonatal mortality is marginally higher among babies born on weekends than among those born on weekdays.6,7,8,9,10,11 In addition, the management of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and drug overdose may be worse for patients presenting on weekends than for those presenting on weekdays.12,13,14 Even the widely publicized death of Libby Zion in 1984, which led to an examination of the quality of care in teaching hospitals, is noteworthy because she died a few hours after being admitted to a hospital on a Sunday night.15

We conducted a study involving all acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada, over a 10-year period to compare the rate of death among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends with the rate among patients admitted on weekdays.

Methods

Data Collection

We identified every patient admitted to an acute care hospital through an emergency department in Ontario between April 1, 1988, and March 31, 1997. This interval was chosen because it encompassed all the available data. Hospital-discharge data were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, regardless of whether the patient had died in the hospital, had been discharged home, or had been transferred to another facility. We excluded all elective admissions, urgent referrals, elective transfers, and births.

Consecutive patients were identified according to the day of the week when they were admitted. The weekend was defined as the period from midnight on Friday to midnight on Sunday. All other times were defined as weekdays. For patients transferred between hospitals, the day of admission was defined as the day they presented to the initial acute care facility. Patients were classified according to the single diagnostic code in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), that was the primary reason for their hospital stay. (Whereas in the United States, ICD codes are assigned according to the primary reason for admission, in Canada they are assigned according to the primary reason for the entire hospital stay.) The reliability of the coding of data collected by the Canadian Institute for Health Information is 74 to 96 percent for the ICD-9 diagnosis, 97 percent for the day of admission, and more than 99 percent for death.16,17 The patient's age and sex and any coexisting conditions were also documented.18,19,20,21,22,23

Prespecified Conditions

We anticipated no major difference in aggregate mortality among patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays; however, we hypothesized that there would be a difference in mortality for three prespecified conditions. These conditions were selected according to seven criteria that we theorized would accentuate the consequences of lower staffing levels on weekends. The criteria were as follows: the condition occurs frequently, the in-hospital mortality rate among patients with the condition is high, the first few days of hospitalization are critical, the condition is treatable, care involves logistic difficulties, death can be rapid, and patients with the condition typically receive a substantial amount of care in clinical settings other than a critical care unit or emergency department. The three diseases we identified that met these criteria were ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute epiglottitis, and pulmonary embolism.

We also identified three conditions that did not meet the seven criteria — that is, control conditions, for which we anticipated equivalent mortality rates among patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays. The first was acute myocardial infarction, which is usually managed in a critical care setting, where fluctuations in staffing levels are minimal.24,25 The second was acute intracerebral hemorrhage, for which effective treatment is generally unavailable.26 The third was acute hip fracture, a condition that is sometimes treated more promptly on weekends than on weekdays, because operating rooms are more available on weekends.27,28,29

Most Frequent Causes of Death

We conducted a comprehensive analysis, with no prespecified hypotheses, by ranking every ICD-9 diagnosis according to the total number of in-hospital deaths and, from this list, selecting the 100 diagnoses that caused the most deaths. We compared in-hospital mortality among patients with these diagnoses according to whether they were admitted on a weekend or a weekday. To determine whether excess mortality among patients admitted on a weekend was closely linked to weekend care, we performed additional analyses of deaths that occurred within two days after admission, again comparing the mortality rate among patients admitted on a weekend with that among patients admitted on a weekday.

Statistical Analysis

In the primary analysis, we compared the in-hospital mortality rate among patients who were admitted on a weekend with the rate among those admitted on a weekday. Logistic regression was used to test for differences in mortality rates between these two groups after adjustment for age, sex, and the score on the Charlson comorbidity index (a weighted index of the number of serious coexisting diseases on a scale of 0 to 8).30,31 Differences in mortality rates are expressed as odds ratios for death, where appropriate. All reported P values are two-tailed.

We took special care to minimize the risk of obtaining spurious results because of multiple statistical tests. First, we examined prespecified conditions and applied the conventional criterion for statistical significance (P<0.05). Then we examined the 100 most frequent causes of death, without prespecified comparisons, and used two comprehensive analyses. In one analysis, based on the exact binomial distribution, we determined the proportion of conditions for which weekend mortality was higher than that which would be expected by chance.32 In the other analysis, based on hierarchical logistic regression, we considered each condition separately.33,34 Our rationale for using two approaches was to determine whether alternative analyses yielded similar results, with the use of a threshold criterion of 1 in a million as the standard for statistical significance (P<1.00x10–6).

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre. We used protocols of the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario to maintain the confidentiality of the study data.

Results

During the 10-year study period, there were 3,789,917 hospital admissions, or about 1038 per day. There were no large differences in base-line characteristics between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays (Table 1). The mean age of the patients was 51 years, and about 1 in 10 was a child; approximately half were women. Approximately one third of the patients arrived at the hospital by ambulance, and about one fifth were admitted to a teaching hospital. Disorders of the circulatory system were the single most common category of ICD-9 diagnoses. Overall, 26.5 percent of the patients were admitted on a weekend. A total of 222,517 patients died.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients Admitted on Weekdays and Weekends.

 
Prespecified Conditions

We identified 5454 patients who were hospitalized for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Approximately 24 percent of these patients were admitted on a weekend, and about 76 percent were admitted on a weekday. The mortality rate was higher among the patients admitted on a weekend than among those admitted on a weekday (Table 2). After adjustment for age, sex, and the score on the Charlson comorbidity index, the odds ratio for death among patients admitted on a weekend, as compared with those admitted on a weekday, was 1.28 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.46); the adjusted odds ratio was similar when the analysis was restricted to deaths that occurred within two days after admission (odds ratio, 1.35; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.52).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. In-Hospital Mortality According to the Day of Admission.

 
For the two other prespecified conditions, acute epiglottitis and pulmonary embolism, the mortality rate was also higher among patients admitted on a weekend than among those admitted on a weekday (Table 2). Furthermore, for both conditions, the adjusted odds ratio for death was even higher in the analysis restricted to deaths that occurred within two days after admission (odds ratio for patients with epiglottitis, 10.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.21 to 90.65; odds ratio for patients with pulmonary embolism, 1.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.69).

There were 160,220 admissions for acute myocardial infarction, 10,987 for acute intracerebral hemorrhage, and 59,670 for acute hip fracture. For these control conditions, there was no significant difference in mortality according to whether patients were admitted on a weekend or a weekday (Table 2).

Most Frequent Causes of Death

The 100 conditions that were the most frequent causes of death accounted for 1,820,885 hospital admissions (48 percent of all admissions) and 202,798 deaths (91 percent of all deaths). The mortality rates among patients with these conditions who were admitted on a weekend, as compared with those admitted on a weekday, are available as Supplementary Appendix 1 with the full text of this article at http:// www.nejm.org. For 23 of the conditions, admission on a weekend was associated with a significant increase in mortality (Table 3). Conversely, weekend admission was not associated with a significantly reduced mortality rate for any of the 100 conditions. The exact binomial distribution indicated that this pattern was unlikely to be due to chance, as did the coefficient estimate from the hierarchical logistic-regression model for an association between admission on a weekend and an increased mortality rate.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Supplementary Appendix 1. In-Hospital Mortality for the 100 Leading Causes of Death, According to the Day of Admission.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Conditions for Which Weekend Admission Was Associated with Significantly Higher Mortality Than Was Weekday Admission.

 
For the 100 conditions, we calculated the median odds ratio for death among patients admitted on a weekend as compared with those admitted on a weekday. The median odds ratio was similar for men and women, for teaching hospitals and nonteaching hospitals, for patients who arrived at the hospital by ambulance and those who did not, for patients who underwent surgery and those who did not, and for admissions in the first half of the decade and those in the second half. The relative increase in mortality among patients admitted on a weekend was greater for diseases with high case fatality rates than for those with lower case fatality rates. For example, the median odds ratio for death associated with weekend admission was higher for conditions with a case fatality rate that exceeded 20 percent than for those with a lower case fatality rate (1.11 vs. 1.04, P=0.01).

Short-Term Mortality

Analyses of deaths within two days after admission, rather than total in-hospital deaths, generally showed larger relative differences in mortality between weekend and weekday admissions. When all possible diagnoses (conditions accounting for the 3,789,917 admissions) were included in the analysis, there was a small increase in mortality among patients admitted on a weekend (1.8 percent vs. 1.6 percent, P<0.001). When only the 100 most frequent causes of death were included in the analysis, 26 conditions were associated with a significant increase in mortality with weekend admission, and no condition was associated with a significant decrease in mortality with weekend admission.

Proportion of Weekend Admissions

We also determined whether the proportion of weekend admissions differed from that which would be expected (2/7, or 28.6 percent). For all admissions, the proportion of weekend admissions was 26.5 percent. For the top 100 causes of death, the average proportion of weekend admissions was 25.5 percent (range, 21.0 to 33.8 percent); the proportion of weekend admissions was similar for the 23 conditions that were associated with an increase in mortality among patients admitted on a weekend and the 77 that were not (23.4 and 21.5 percent, respectively; P=0.85).

Discussion

We examined nearly 3.8 million consecutive emergency hospitalizations of patients in Ontario, Canada, over a 10-year period. For ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute epiglottitis, and pulmonary embolism, the mortality rate among patients admitted on a weekend was higher than that among patients admitted on a weekday. Of the 100 conditions that caused the most deaths, 23 were associated with significantly higher mortality rates among patients admitted on a weekend than among those admitted on a weekday. The increase in mortality persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and the score on the Charlson comorbidity index and was greater in analyses of short-term in-hospital mortality than in analyses of total in-hospital mortality. No disease was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate among patients admitted on a weekend than among those admitted on a weekday, and the relative increase in mortality associated with weekend admission appeared to be greatest for the conditions that were especially lethal.

Are patients who are admitted on weekends sicker than those admitted on weekdays? We found that the results of both the adjusted analyses and the stratified analyses were similar to those of the crude analyses, suggesting that the findings were probably not due to unmeasured factors such as the severity of illness. In addition, we excluded elective admissions and identified conditions that were not obviously connected with lifestyle (unlike injuries from motor vehicle crashes and handguns, which are often severe and occur frequently on weekends).3,4,35 Moreover, analyses of deaths within two days after admission yielded even larger differences in mortality between weekend and weekday admissions, a finding that supports a true difference and would not be expected if our findings were due to a general increase in the severity of conditions among patients admitted on weekends.

We cannot exclude the possibility that patients admitted on weekends are sicker than those admitted on weekdays. However, a greater severity of illness among patients admitted to acute care hospitals on weekends would still raise questions about the adequacy of medical care and staffing patterns.36 We believe that the difference in mortality rates between weekend and weekday admissions may be most important in the case of patients with complex disorders that are associated with a high mortality rate outside of critical care settings.

The limitations of this study should be noted. We relied on administrative data that may have included coding errors. However, it is unlikely that the accuracy of coding differed between weekend and weekday admissions, and any random miscoding would have resulted in an underestimate of the magnitude of the effect of weekend admission. In addition, our analysis did not account for statutory holidays, a fact that may have blurred the observed differences. The mortality rates were similar to those in other population-based studies.37,38,39,40,41,42 However, since our study does not account for deaths declared by paramedics outside the hospital, which are more common on weekends than on weekdays (Vermeulen M: personal communication), we may have underestimated differences in mortality. Perhaps the greatest limitation is that a focus on in-hospital mortality does not allow for consideration of the timeliness of care, patients' degree of satisfaction, and many other aspects of the quality of medical care.43

Our findings have several possible explanations. One concerns staffing. Fewer people work in hospitals on weekends than on weekdays.36,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 Those who do work on weekends often have less seniority and experience than those who work on weekdays.51,52 In addition, weekend staff often provide coverage for other health professionals and may be less familiar with the patients under their charge.53 There are also fewer supervisors on weekends, and they are often responsible for overseeing the work of staff members they do not know well.51,52,53,54,55

Working on the weekend is unpopular.56,57 Yet the uneven staffing patterns in acute care hospitals conflict with business practices in other sectors of society that strive for the same level of activity on each day of the week. Maintaining a more consistent level of activity is sometimes economical, even if staff members are paid higher wages for weekend duties.1,58,59 Greater attention to weekend care may also reduce the commotion often seen on Monday mornings in acute care hospitals. Our findings suggest that health care providers should be concerned about the increased risk of death among patients who seek emergency care on weekends.

Dr. Bell is the recipient of Clinician-Scientist Awards from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto. Dr. Redelmeier is the recipient of a Career Scientist Award from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, funds from the deSouza Chair in Clinical Trauma Research at the University of Toronto, and a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

We are indebted to Santino Profenna, Alex Kopp, and Peter Austin for their help with computer programming and to Allan Detsky, Bill Geerts, David Hodgson, Neill Iscoe, David Juurlink, Peter Kaboli, Andreas Laupacis, Miriam Shuchman, Steve Shumak, Matthew Stanbrook, Jack Tu, and Jack Williams for their comments on drafts of this report.


Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto (C.M.B., D.A.R.); the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre (C.M.B., D.A.R.); the Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto (C.M.B., D.A.R.); and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (D.A.R.) — all in Toronto.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Redelmeier at Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Rm. G-151, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada, or at dar{at}ices.on.ca.

References

  1. Lamn H. The lost weekend in hospitals. N Engl J Med 1973;289:923-923. 
  2. DeCoster C, Roos NP, Carriere KC, Peterson S. Inappropriate hospital use by patients receiving care for medical conditions: targeting utilization review. CMAJ 1997;157:889-896. [Abstract]
  3. Rogot E, Fabsitz R, Feinleib M. Daily variation in USA mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:198-211. [Free Full Text]
  4. Trudeau R. Monthly and daily patterns of death. Health Rep 1997;9:43-50.
  5. Evans C, Chalmers J, Capewell S, et al. "I don't like Mondays" -- day of the week of coronary heart disease deaths in Scotland: study of routinely collected data. BMJ 2000;320:218-219. [Free Full Text]
  6. Mangold WD. Neonatal mortality by the day of the week in the 1974-75 Arkansas live birth cohort. Am J Public Health 1981;71:601-605. [Free Full Text]
  7. MacFarlane A. Variations in number of births and perinatal mortality by day of week in England and Wales. BMJ 1978;2:1670-1673.
  8. Stanley FJ, Alberman EV. Infants of very low birthweight. I. Perinatal factors affecting survival. Dev Med Child Neurol 1978;20:300-312. [ISI][Medline]
  9. Mathers CD. Births and perinatal deaths in Australia: variations by day of week. J Epidemiol Community Health 1983;37:57-62. [Abstract]
  10. Dowding VM, Duignan NM, Henry GR, MacDonald DW. Induction of labour, birthweight and perinatal mortality by day of the week. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:413-419. [ISI][Medline]
  11. Hendry RA. The weekend -- a dangerous time to be born? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981;88:1200-1203. [ISI][Medline]
  12. Fogelholm R, Murros K, Rissanen A, Ilmavirta M. Factors delaying hospital admission after acute stroke. Stroke 1996;27:398-400. [Free Full Text]
  13. Ottesen MM, Kober L, Jorgensen S, Torp-Pedersen C. Determinants of delay between symptoms and hospital admission in 5978 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1996;17:429-437. [Free Full Text]
  14. Boyes AP. Repetition of overdose: a retrospective 5-year study. J Adv Nurs 1994;20:462-468. [CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Asch DA, Parker RM. The Libby Zion case: one step forward or two steps backward? N Engl J Med 1988;318:771-775. [ISI][Medline]
  16. Williams JI, Young W. A summary of studies on the quality of health care administrative databases in Canada. In: Goel V, Williams JI, Anderson GM, Blackstien-Hirsch P, Fooks C, Naylor CD, eds. Patterns of health care in Ontario: the ICES practice atlas. 2nd ed. Ottawa, Ont.: Canadian Medical Association, 1996:339-45.
  17. Williams JI, Young W. Inventory of studies on the accuracy of Canadian health administrative databases. Technical report. Ottawa, Ont.: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, December 1996.
  18. Jha P, DeBoer D, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Characteristics and mortality outcomes of thrombolysis trial participants and nonparticipants: a population-based comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1335-1342. [Abstract]
  19. Delfino RJ, Becklake MR, Hanley JA. Reliability of hospital data for population-based studies of air pollution. Arch Environ Health 1993;48:140-146. [ISI][Medline]
  20. Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Wright JG, Paul JE, Bombardier C. Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:265-273. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  21. Malenka DJ, McLerran D, Roos N, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE. Using administrative data to describe casemix: a comparison with the medical record. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1027-1032. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  22. Roos LL, Mustard CA, Nicol JP, et al. Registries and administrative data: organization and accuracy. Med Care 1993;31:201-212. [ISI][Medline]
  23. Roos LL, Walld R, Wajda A, Bond R, Hartford K. Record linkage strategies, outpatient procedures, and administrative data. Med Care 1996;34:570-582. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, et al. 1999 Update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:890-911. [Free Full Text]
  25. Critical care services and personnel: recommendations based on a system of categorization into two levels of care. Crit Care Med 1999;27:422-426. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Broderick JP, Adams HP Jr, Barsan W, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1999;30:905-915. [Free Full Text]
  27. Bredahl C, Nyholm B, Hindsholm KB, Mortensen JS, Olesen AS. Mortality after hip fracture: results of operation within 12 h of admission. Injury 1992;23:83-86. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Zuckerman JD, Skovron ML, Koval KJ, Aharonoff G, Frankel VH. Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1551-1556. [Free Full Text]
  29. Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, Sledge CB. Hip fracture mortality: relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop 1984;186:45-56. [Medline]
  30. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613-619. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  31. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-383. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  32. Rosner BA. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 4th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1995.
  33. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE, 1999.
  34. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW, Congdon RT. Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1996.
  35. Moulton D. Doctors in South Africa becoming gun-shy. CMAJ 2000;162:1602-1602. 
  36. Internal analysis. Toronto: Ontario Nursing Association, November 3, 2000.
  37. Marciniak TA, Ellerbeck EF, Radford MJ, et al. Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA 1998;279:1351-1357. [Free Full Text]
  38. Siddique RM, Siddique MI, Connors AF Jr, Rimm AA. Thirty-day case-fatality rates for pulmonary embolism in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2343-2347. [Abstract]
  39. Katz DJ, Stanley JC, Zelenock GB. Operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Michigan: an eleven-year statewide experience. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:804-815. [ISI][Medline]
  40. Frantz TD, Rasgon BM. Acute epiglottitis: changing epidemiologic patterns. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;109:457-460. [Medline]
  41. Howard G, Craven TE, Sanders L, Evans GW. Relationship of hospitalized stroke rate and in-hospital mortality to the decline in US stroke mortality. Neuroepidemiology 1991;10:251-259. [Medline]
  42. Riley G, Lubitz J, Gornick M, Mentnech R, Eggers P, McBean M. Medicare beneficiaries: adverse outcomes after hospitalization for eight procedures. Med Care 1993;31:921-949. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  43. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000.
  44. Tarnow-Mordi WO, Hau C, Warden A, Shearer AJ. Hospital mortality in relation to staff workload: a 4-year study in an adult intensive-care unit. Lancet 2000;356:185-189. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  45. Czaplinski C, Diers D. The effect of staff nursing on length of stay and mortality. Med Care 1998;36:1626-1638. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  46. Kovner C, Gergen PJ. Nurse staffing levels and adverse events following surgery in U.S. hospitals. Image J Nurs Sch 1998;30:315-321. [Medline]
  47. Blegen MA, Vaughn T. A multisite study of nurse staffing and patient occurrences. Nurs Econ 1998;16:196-203. [ISI][Medline]
  48. Strzalka A, Havens DS. Nursing care quality: comparison of unit-hired, hospital float pool, and agency nurses. J Nurs Care Qual 1996;10:59-65. 
  49. McCloskey JM. Nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Nurs Outlook 1998;46:199-200. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  50. Archibald LK, Manning ML, Bell LM, Banerjee S, Jarvis WR. Patient density, nurse-to-patient ratio and nosocomial infection risk in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16:1045-1048. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  51. Thorpe KE. House staff supervision and working hours: implications of regulatory change in New York State. JAMA 1990;263:3177-3181. [Abstract]
  52. McKee M, Black N. Does the current use of junior doctors in the United Kingdom affect the quality of medical care? Soc Sci Med 1992;34:549-558.
  53. Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O'Neil AC, Cook EF, Lee TH. Does house staff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann Intern Med 1994;121:866-872. [Free Full Text]
  54. Bell BM. Supervision, not regulation of hours, is the key to improving the quality of patient care. JAMA 1993;269:403-404. [CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Lofgren RP, Gottlieb D, Williams RA, Rich EC. Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care. J Gen Intern Med 1990;5:501-505. [ISI][Medline]
  56. Wallace M. Guidelines for managing shiftwork: OHS implications of shiftwork and irregular hours of work. Ivanhoe East, Australia: National Occupational Health and Safety Commission of Australia, 1999.
  57. Girotti MJ, Leslie K, Chinnick B, Butcher C, Holliday RL. Attitudes of surgical residents toward trauma care: a Canadian-based study. J Trauma 1994;36:101-105. [Medline]
  58. Jones L, Rinaldo S. Weekend shift at 3M. CTV National News. December 14, 1997 (transcript).
  59. Moore JD Jr. Hospital saves by working weekends. Mod Healthc 1996;26:82, 84, 99-82, 84, 99. [Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Halm, E. A.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.