A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization
Marie-Claude Morice, M.D., Patrick W. Serruys, M.D., Ph.D., J. Eduardo Sousa, M.D., Jean Fajadet, M.D., Ernesto Ban Hayashi, M.D., Marco Perin, M.D., Antonio Colombo, M.D., G. Schuler, M.D., Paul Barragan, M.D., Giulio Guagliumi, M.D., Ferenc Molnàr, M.D., Robert Falotico, Ph.D., for the RAVEL Study Group
Background The need for repeated treatment of restenosis ofa treated vessel remains the main limitation of percutaneouscoronary revascularization. Because sirolimus (rapamycin) inhibitsthe proliferation of lymphocytes and smooth-muscle cells, wecompared a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard uncoatedstent in patients with angina pectoris.
Methods We performed a randomized, double-blind trial to comparethe two types of stents for revascularization of single, primarylesions in native coronary arteries. The trial included 238patients at 19 medical centers. The primary end point was in-stentlate luminal loss (the difference between the minimal luminaldiameter immediately after the procedure and the diameter atsix months). Secondary end points included the percentage ofin-stent stenosis of the luminal diameter and the rate of restenosis(luminal narrowing of 50 percent or more). We also analyzeda composite clinical end point consisting of death, myocardialinfarction, and percutaneous or surgical revascularization at1, 6, and 12 months.
Results At six months, the degree of neointimal proliferation,manifested as the mean (±SD) late luminal loss, was significantlylower in the sirolimus-stent group (0.01±0.33mm) than in the standard-stent group (0.80±0.53 mm, P<0.001).None of the patients in the sirolimus-stent group, as comparedwith 26.6 percent of those in the standard-stent group, hadrestenosis of 50 percent or more of the luminal diameter (P<0.001).There were no episodes of stent thrombosis. During a follow-upperiod of up to one year, the overall rate of major cardiacevents was 5.8 percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 28.8percent in the standard-stent group (P<0.001). The differencewas due entirely to a higher rate of revascularization of thetarget vessel in the standard-stent group.
Conclusions As compared with a standard coronary stent, a sirolimus-elutingstent shows considerable promise for the prevention of neointimalproliferation, restenosis, and associated clinical events.
The growing use of stents has improved the results of percutaneouscoronary revascularization.1,2,3,4,5 However, in-stent restenosiscontinues to limit the long-term success of this approach.6,7For example, in a recent randomized comparison of coronary-arterybypass surgery and stenting in patients with multivessel disease,additional revascularization procedures were performed withinone year in 21.0 percent of patients who had undergone stenting,as compared with 3.8 percent of patients treated surgically.8
In controlled trials, several pharmaceutical agents have failedto inhibit restenosis after coronary interventions.9 In contrast,the systemic and local delivery of sirolimus (rapamycin), amacrocyclic lactone that inhibits cytokine-mediated and growth-factormediatedproliferation of lymphocytes and smooth-muscle cells, reducedneointimal proliferation in studies in animals and in a smallclinical study.10,11,12 We conducted a study to compare theperformance of a coronary stent that slowly releases sirolimusover a period of 30 days with that of a standard uncoated stent.
Methods
Selection of Patients
The study was a randomized, double-blind trial performed at19 medical centers (listed in the Appendix). It was approvedby the ethics committee at each participating institution, andall patients gave written informed consent. The study was conductedfrom August 2000 to August 2001.
Patients were eligible for the study if they were 18 to 85 yearsold, were not pregnant and were protected against pregnancyduring the study, and had received a diagnosis of stable orunstable angina or silent ischemia. Additional eligibility criteriawere the presence of a single primary target lesion in a nativecoronary artery that was 2.5 to 3.5 mm in diameter and thatcould be covered by an 18-mm stent; stenosis of 51 to 99 percentof the luminal diameter, as estimated visually; and a flow rateof grade 1 or higher according to the classification of theThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Patientswere not eligible for enrollment if they had an evolving myocardialinfarction, stenosis of the left-main coronary artery, unprotectedby a graft, that caused luminal narrowing of 50 percent or more,an ostial lesion, a calcified lesion that could not be completelydilated before stenting, an angiographically visible thrombuswithin the target lesion, a left ventricular ejection fractionof less than 30 percent, or an intolerance of aspirin, clopidogrel,ticlopidine, heparin, stainless steel, or contrast material.
The Sirolimus-Eluting Stent
Sirolimus was blended in a mixture of nonerodable polymers,and a layer of sirolimuspolymer matrix with a thicknessof 5 µm was applied to the surface of a stainless-steel,balloon-expandable stent (Bx Velocity, Cordis, Johnson &Johnson). The stent was loaded with a fixed amount of sirolimusper unit of metal surface area (140 µg of sirolimus persquare centimeter). A layer of drug-free polymer was appliedon top of the drugpolymer matrix as a diffusion barrierto prolong the release of the drug. The stent was designed torelease approximately 80 percent of the drug within 30 daysafter implantation.
Study Procedures
Codes for random assignments to the treatment groups were generatedby computer in blocks of four and were distributed in sealedenvelopes to each participating center. Patients were randomlyassigned to the groups in a 1:1 ratio.
Lesions were treated with the use of standard interventionaltechniques. Stenting without predilation was prohibited. Aftersuccessful predilation, patients were randomly assigned in adouble-blind fashion to receive a standard uncoated stent ora sirolimus-eluting stent mounted on a rapid-exchange deliverysystem and inflated to 10 to 16 atm. The sirolimus-eluting stentswere indistinguishable, except under a microscope, from theuncoated stents. After the stent had been implanted, furtherdilation was performed as necessary to ensure that there wasless than 20 percent residual stenosis, with a TIMI grade IIIflow rate. In case of dissection or incomplete coverage of thelesion, additional stents of the same type as the assigned stent(coated or uncoated) were used.
Intravenous boluses of heparin were administered to maintainan activated clotting time that exceeded 250 seconds duringthe procedure and were discontinued within 12 hours. Treatmentwith aspirin, at a dose of at least 100 mg per day, was begun12 hours before the procedure and continued indefinitely. Aloading dose of 300 mg of clopidogrel was administered 48 hoursbefore the procedure, followed by 75 mg daily for eight weeks.Alternatively, treatment with ticlopidine, at a dose of 250mg twice daily, was begun one day before the procedure and continuedfor eight weeks. A successful procedure was defined as the successfulimplantation of the study device, with stenosis of less than20 percent of the vessel diameter and no major cardiac eventsduring the hospital stay.
Follow-up
Patients were evaluated at 30 days and at 6 and 12 months. Theywere asked specific questions about the interim developmentof angina, according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Societyclassification of stable angina13 and the Braunwald classificationof unstable angina.14 The patients were also monitored for majorcardiac events and for the need for additional revascularizationof the index target lesion. An electrocardiogram was obtainedat each visit, and an angiographic study was performed at amean (±SD) of 180±30 days. Other studies and testswere performed at the discretion of the investigators at theparticipating centers. Because of the double-blind nature ofthe study, the decision to perform further revascularizationof the target lesion or vessel after the six-month angiographicstudy was also left to the investigators' discretion.
Quantitative Coronary Angiographic Evaluation
Coronary angiograms were obtained in multiple views after theintracoronary injection of nitrates. Quantitative analyses ofall angiographic data before, during, and after the procedurewere performed by an independent core laboratory (Cardialysis,Rotterdam, the Netherlands) with the use of edge-detection techniques.The luminal diameter of the coronary artery and the degree ofstenosis were measured before dilation, at the end of the procedure,and at six months. Restenosis was defined as stenosis of 50percent or more of the luminal diameter. Late luminal loss wasdefined as the difference between the minimal luminal diameterimmediately after the procedure and the diameter at six months.The target lesion was defined as the stented segment plus the5-mm segments proximal and distal to the stented segment.
Intravascular Ultrasound Substudy
At the six-month visit, intravascular ultrasound examinationswere performed by six centers in subgroups of 48 patients whohad received a sirolimus-eluting stent and 47 who had receivedan uncoated stent.
Study End Points
The primary angiographic end point was in-stent luminal lateloss, as determined by quantitative angiography. Secondary endpoints included the percentage of in-stent stenosis of the luminaldiameter, the rate of restenosis (luminal narrowing of 50 percentor more), and the minimal luminal diameter of the stented segmentand of the 5-mm segments proximal and distal to the stent atsix months.
The primary clinical end point of the study was a compositeof major cardiac events, including death, Q-wave or nonQ-wavemyocardial infarction, coronary-artery bypass grafting, andrevascularization of the target lesion or vessel 30 days, 6months, and 12 months after the index procedure. A nonQ-wavemyocardial infarction was defined by an increase in the creatinekinase level to more than twice the upper limit of the normalrange, accompanied by an increased level of creatine kinaseMB, in the absence of new Q waves on the surface electrocardiogram.
The end points were adjudicated by an independent clinical-eventscommittee. In addition, a data and safety monitoring board thatwas not affiliated with the study sponsor reviewed the datato identify any safety issues related to the conduct of thestudy.
Statistical Analysis
We calculated that with a sample of 207 patients, the studywould have 90 percent power to detect a difference in the meanlate luminal loss of 0.25 mm between the two groups, assuminga standard deviation of 0.55 mm in each group, with the useof a two-group t-test and a two-sided significance level of0.05.
All analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle.For continuous variables, differences between the treatmentgroups were evaluated by analysis of variance or Wilcoxon'srank-sum test. For discrete variables, differences were expressedas counts and percentages and were analyzed with Fisher's exacttest.
Revascularization of the target lesion or vessel and the compositeof major adverse events during follow-up were analyzed by theKaplanMeier method. Differences between the event-freesurvival curves for the two groups were compared with the useof the Wilcoxon and log-rank tests.
All listed authors participated in the study design, enrollmentof patients, and data interpretation. The data were held bythe core laboratory (Cardialysis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands),but all investigators had full access to them.
Results
Characteristics of the Patients
Between August 2000 and January 2001, 120 patients were randomlyassigned to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent, and 118 wereassigned to receive the standard stent. With the exception ofa significantly higher percentage of men in the standard-stentgroup, the two groups were similar with respect to all variablesexamined (Table 1). Overall, 76 percent of the patients weremen, and the mean age was 60.7 years, with the expected prevalencesof dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and current tobaccouse. Stenting was performed because of unstable angina in 50percent of the patients. The target vessel was the left anteriordescending coronary artery in 50 percent of the patients, theright coronary vessel in 27 percent, and the left circumflexartery in 23 percent. Nearly all the treated lesions were classB1 or B2 according to the American College of CardiologyAmericanHeart Association classification. Although all the target indexlesions were primary lesions, 1.7 percent of the patients hadundergone previous coronary-artery surgery and 18.1 percenthad undergone previous percutaneous interventions for the treatmentof other lesions.
Table 1. Base-Line Characteristics of the Overall Patient Population and of Each Treatment Group.
Procedural Characteristics
The lesions in the two groups were treated similarly with theuse of conventional techniques. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIainhibitors, the use of which was left to the discretion of theinvestigators at the participating centers, were administeredto 10.1 percent of the patients in the sirolimus-stent groupand 9.5 percent of those in the standard-stent group. The twogroups did not differ significantly with respect to the rateof successful stent placement (96.6 percent in the sirolimus-stentgroup and 93.1 percent in the standard-stent group).
Quantitative Angiographic Analysis
Angiographic data at six months were available for 211 of the238 patients (88.7 percent). The mean reference diameter ofthe target vessel and the mean length of the lesion at baseline were similar in the two groups (Table 1). The mean minimalluminal diameter of the stented segment and the length of thelesion before and after the procedure, as well as the reductionin stenosis immediately after the procedure, were also similarin the two groups (Table 2). At six months, however, the meanminimal luminal diameter of the stented segment was significantlygreater in the sirolimus-stent group. The mean in-stent lateloss, percentage of stenosis, and percentage of patients with50 percent or more stenosis were 0.01 mm, 14.7 percent,and 0 percent, respectively, in the sirolimus-stent group, ascompared with 0.80 mm, 36.7 percent, and 26.6 percent, respectively,in the standard-stent group (P<0.001 for each comparison).Figure 1 shows the cumulative frequency of stenosis immediatelyafter the index procedure and at six months in each treatmentgroup. Table 2 shows the results of subsegmental quantitativeangiographic analyses. The late luminal loss at both the proximaland the distal edges of the stent was significantly less inthe sirolimus-stent group than in the standard-stent group (P<0.001for both comparisons). There was a small degree of restenosisat the edges of the standard stent that was not present withthe sirolimus-eluting stent.
Figure 1. Cumulative Frequency of Stenosis Immediately after Stenting and at Six Months in Patients Who Received Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and in Those Who Received Standard Stents.
The broken lines indicate the percentage of lesions with restenosis (above the line, 22.9 percent) and without restenosis (below the line, 77.1 percent) according to the study definition.
In the subgroup of patients with diabetes, 19 patients receivedsirolimus-eluting stents, and 25 received standard stents. Theminimal luminal diameter before and after stenting was similarin the two groups (0.99 mm in the sirolimus-stent group and0.93 mm in the standard-stent group before the procedure and2.37 and 2.36 mm, respectively, afterward). However, at sixmonths, the minimal luminal diameter was markedly larger inthe sirolimus-stent group (2.29 mm, vs. 1.56 mm in the standard-stentgroup; P<0.001); consequently, the late loss was smaller(0.07 mm in the sirolimus-stent group vs. 0.82 mm in the standard-stentgroup, P<0.001) and the restenosis rate was lower (0 percentvs. 41.7 percent, P=0.002).
Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation
At six months, intravascular ultrasound examination showed nosignificant differences between the two groups with respectto the volume of the stent, the volume of the overall vessel,or the volume of the plaque behind the stent. However, the sirolimus-stentgroup had significantly less neointimal hyperplasia than didthe standard-stent group (2±5 vs. 37±28 mm3) andsignificantly less volume obstruction, defined as the ratioof the volume of hyperplasia to the volume of the stent, multipliedby 100 (1±3 percent vs. 29±20 percent) (P<0.001for both comparisons). These findings are consistent with thenearly complete suppression of in-stent neointimal hyperplasiaby sirolimus. In addition, there was no evidence of an "edgeeffect," aneurysm formation, in-stent thrombosis, or persistentdissection.
Adverse Events
Major cardiac events are listed in Table 3. Three patients ineach group had a myocardial infarction at the time of stenting.In the sirolimus-stent group, two of the patients with myocardialinfarction underwent angiography in the hospital, which showeda patent stent in each. The third patient had a nonQ-wavemyocardial infarction, and the angiographic study performedat six months showed a patent stent. One recipient of a standardstent underwent further percutaneous revascularization of thetarget vessel for the treatment of a lesion other than the indexlesion.
Table 3. Cardiac Events in the Hospital and during One Year of Follow-up.
During a follow-up period of up to one year, two patients inthe standard-stent group (1.7 percent) died: one had a myocardialinfarction and died suddenly several weeks later, and the otherhad a gastric hemorrhage. Two patients in the sirolimus-stentgroup (1.7 percent) also died: one had a subarachnoid hemorrhage,and the other had gastrointestinal cancer. One patient in eachgroup underwent surgical revascularization of the index targetvessel.
Percutaneous revascularization of the target lesion was performedin 27 recipients of standard stents (22.9 percent) but in noneof the recipients of sirolimus-eluting stents (P=0.001). Subacuteor late thrombotic occlusion of the stent did not occur in eithergroup.
KaplanMeier estimates of event-free survival are shownin Figure 2. The overall rate of major cardiac events was 5.8percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 28.8 percent in thestandard-stent group (P<0.001). The difference between thetwo groups was entirely due to the greater need for repeatedrevascularization of the target vessel in the standard-stentgroup. No adverse effects were attributable to the sirolimuscoating of stents.
Figure 2. KaplanMeier Estimates of Survival Free of Myocardial Infarction and Repeated Revascularization among Patients Who Received Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Those Who Received Standard Stents.
The rate of event-free survival was significantly higher in the sirolimus-stent group than in the standard-stent group (P<0.001 by the Wilcoxon and log-rank tests).
Discussion
We found that use of a sirolimus-eluting stent resulted in thevirtual elimination of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia; thus,there was no angiographic evidence of restenosis and no needfor repeated interventions. Since the introduction of angioplasty,restenosis has been a major factor limiting the long-term successof percutaneous coronary revascularization.15 The refinementof stenting techniques in the past decade has substantiallyimproved the overall results of the procedure.3,4,16,17 Despiteconsiderable efforts to prevent the development of restenosis,however, including systemic or local delivery of biochemicalsubstances and drugs9 and the use of various devices,18,19,20,21,22additional target-vessel revascularization is required in morethan 15 percent of patients.8,23 Although catheter-based brachytherapyis effective in the treatment of in-stent restenosis,24 itsvalue in the treatment of primary lesions is less clear. Furthermore,the use of brachytherapy is limited by its high cost and burdensomeinstrumentation and by the risks inherent in the use of radioisotopes.
In this context, the benefit of the sirolimus-eluting stentin our study was particularly striking. This new device appearsto have virtually eliminated the development of neointimal proliferation.Yet its use did not require special implantation techniquesor instrumentation and was innocuous within the time frame ofthe study.
In the group of patients with sirolimus-eluting stents, thepercentage of stenosis at six months was essentially the sameas that immediately after the procedure and was in all casesless than 35 percent. The virtual absence of late loss in theluminal diameter in this group is consistent with the arrestof in-stent neointimal proliferation by sirolimus. Also noteworthywas the absence of restenosis and major cardiac events in thepatients with diabetes who received sirolimus-eluting stents.Whether these effects can be sustained for several years remainsto be determined. The results thus far suggest that the useof an appropriate therapeutic agent when growth-factorinducedcell proliferation is at its peak can have substantial effectson the process of in-stent restenosis.
Sirolimus, a macrolide antifungal agent with a unique antiproliferativemode of action and powerful immunosuppressant properties, inhibitsseveral regulators of cell-cycle progression and the migrationof vascular smooth-muscle cells.25 Yet studies in animals haveshown that reendothelialization may occur even while sirolimusis being eluted.26 Moreover, recent experiments in animals haveshown that sirolimus blocks inflammation.26 These antiproliferative,antimigratory, and antiinflammatory properties are responsiblefor the efficacy of sirolimus therapy in preventing acute rejectionof renal allografts and arteriopathy of cardiac allografts,as well as in-stent restenosis. The wide safety margin of sirolimus27and the minuscule amounts of drug released into the blood explainthe absence of detectable adverse effects in our trial and ina previous clinical study.12
The restenosis rate of 27 percent in the standard-stent groupmay seem high. However, on the basis of a linear regressionmodel derived from the Stent Restenosis Study and the BenestentI and II studies (unpublished data), the predicted rate of restenosisfor our patient cohort was approximately 28 percent. Of the27 patients in the standard-stent group who underwent revascularizationof the target vessel (22.9 percent), 16 did so because of anginaor abnormal stress tests and 11 because of angiographic evidenceof restenosis.
Despite the absence of late luminal loss in the sirolimus-stentgroup, reendothelialization presumably occurred, since noneof the patients in the group had acute, subacute, or late thrombosis,even though they received combined antiplatelet therapy foronly two months. These findings are similar to reported observationsin animals.26
We enrolled patients with single lesions that were up to 18mm long. Whether the positive results in these patients canbe expected in patients with more complex or more extensivedisease remains to be determined. However, a subgroup analysisshowed that the results in patients with diabetes were similarto those in patients without diabetes.
In this trial, 2.5-mm stents were used in 18 percent of thepatients randomly assigned to the sirolimus-stent group. Furthermore,division of the treatment groups into thirds according to thevessel diameter revealed virtually identical late luminal loss,even in the smallest arteries.
Stents that deliver drugs are complex devices with three components:the stent, the drug, and the coating. The long-term outcomeof treatment with these devices will depend on the responseto all three components.
In conclusion, patients with angina who received sirolimus-elutingstents for the treatment of single, primary lesions in nativecoronary arteries had no angiographic evidence of late luminalloss or in-stent restenosis at six months, no episodes of thrombosis,and a very low rate of cardiac events at one year.
Supported by a grant from Cordis, a Johnson & Johnson company.
Dr. Falotico is an employee of Cordis.
We are indebted to Drs. Rodolphe Ruffy, Brian Firth, and DennisDonohoe for their assistance in drafting and reviewing the manuscript.
* The members of the RAVEL (Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-CoatedBx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patientswith de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) study group arelisted in the Appendix.
Source Information
From Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France (M.-C.M.); Thoraxcentrum, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (P.W.S.); Institute Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil (J.E.S.); Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France (J.F.); Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Mexico City, Mexico (E.B.H.); the Heart Institute of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (M.P.); Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy (A.C.); Herzzentrum, Leipzig, Germany (G.S.); Centre Hospitalier Privé Beauregard, Marseilles, France (P.B.); Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy (G.G.); Semmelweis Egyetem Egészégtudomanyi Kar, Budapest, Hungary (F.M.); and Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, N.J. (R.F.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Morice at the Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier, Ave. du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France.
References
Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, Joffre F, Kappenberger L. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1987;316:701-706. [Abstract]
Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK, et al. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1992;85:916-927. [Free Full Text]
Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:489-495. [Free Full Text]
Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim D, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:496-501. [Free Full Text]
Serruys PW, de Bruyne B, Carlier S, et al. Randomized comparison of primary stenting and provisional balloon angioplasty guided by flow velocity measurement. Circulation 2000;102:2930-2937. [Free Full Text]
Dussaillant GR, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:720-724. [Abstract]
Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996;94:1247-1254. [Free Full Text]
Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa E, et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1117-1124. [Free Full Text]
de Feyter PJ, Vos J, Rensing BJ. Anti-restenosis trials. Curr Interv Cardiol Rep 2000;2:326-331. [Medline]
Burke SE, Lubbers NL, Chen Y-W, et al. Neointimal formation after balloon-induced vascular injury in Yucatan minipigs is reduced by oral rapamycin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1999;33:829-835. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Gallo R, Padurean A, Jayaraman T, et al. Inhibition of intimal thickening after balloon angioplasty in porcine coronary arteries by targeting regulators of the cell cycle. Circulation 1999;99:2164-2170. [Free Full Text]
Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2001;103:192-195. [Free Full Text]
Campeau L. Grading for angina pectoris. Circulation 1976;54:522-523. [ISI][Medline]
Braunwald E. Unstable angina: a classification. Circulation 1989;80:410-414. [Free Full Text]
Holmes DR Jr, Vlietstra RE, Smith HC, et al. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): a report from the PTCA Registry of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:Suppl:77C-81C. [CrossRef][Medline]
Serruys PW, van Hout B, Bonnier H, et al. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet 1998;352:673-681. [Erratum, Lancet 1998;352:1478.] [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Versaci F, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, Crea F, Chiariello L, Gioffrè PA. A comparison of coronary-artery stenting with angioplasty for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 1997;336:817-822. [Free Full Text]
Kastrati A, Schomig A, Dirschinger J, et al. Increased risk of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents: results of a randomized trial comparing gold-coated with uncoated steel stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000;101:2478-2483. [Free Full Text]
Kuntz RE, Safian RD, Levin MJ, Reis GJ, Diver DJ, Baim DS. Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:1493-1499. [Abstract]
Mehran R, Dangas G, Mintz GS, et al. Treatment of in-stent restenosis with excimer laser coronary angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy: comparative mechanisms and results. Circulation 2000;101:2484-2489. [Free Full Text]
Topol EJ, Leya F, Pinkerton CA, et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1993;329:221-227. [Free Full Text]
Baim DS, Cutlip DE, Sharma SK, et al. Final results of the Balloon vs Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT). Circulation 1998;97:322-331. [Free Full Text]
Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS Study). Circulation 2001;104:1343-1349. [Free Full Text]
Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Jani S, et al. Catheter-based radiotherapy to inhibit restenosis after coronary stenting. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1697-1703. [Free Full Text]
Marx SO, Marks AR. The development of rapamycin and its application to stent restenosis. Circulation 2001;104:852-855. [Free Full Text]
Suzuki T, Kopia G, Hayashi S, et al. Stent-based delivery of sirolimus reduces neointimal formation in a porcine coronary model. Circulation 2001;104:1188-1193. [Free Full Text]
Saunders RN, Metcalfe MS, Nicholson ML. Rapamycin in transplantation: a review of the evidence. Kidney Int 2001;59:3-16. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Appendix
The following investigators and institutions participated inthe RAVEL study: Steering Committee M.C. Morice (chairperson),Massy, France; P.W. Serruys (cochairperson), Rotterdam, theNetherlands; K. Nijssen, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; C. Bode,Freiburg, Germany; P. Barragan, Marseilles, France; and M. Delattre,Waterloo, Belgium; Sponsor Cordis, Johnson & Johnson,Warren, N.J., E. Wülfert (program coordinator) and C. Demeyere,Waterloo, Belgium; Data and Safety Monitoring Board J.G.P. Tijssen, Amsterdam; G. Steg, Paris; and P. Vranckx, Rotterdam,the Netherlands; Data Management Cardialysis, Rotterdam,the Netherlands; Clinical Events Committee J. Deckers(chairperson), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; J.A.M. te Riele,Breda, the Netherlands; and L.G.P.M. van Zeijl, Rotterdam, theNetherlands; Core Angiographic Laboratory C. Disco,K. Nijssen, and A. Spierings, Cardialysis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;Clinical sites M.C. Morice, T. Lefèvre, and Y.Louvard, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France;P.W. Serruys, M. van den Brand, D. Foley, W. van der Giessen,P. de Feyter, P. Smits, and J. Vos, Thoraxcentrum, Rotterdam,the Netherlands; C. Bode, M. Rave, and C. Holubarsch, AlbertLudwigs Universitätskliniken, Freiburg, Germany; P. Barragan,J.B. Simeoni, C.O. Roquebert, and P. Commeau, Clinique Beauregard,Marseilles, France; G. Schuler, P. Sick, and M. Woinke, Herzzentrum,Leipzig, Germany; G.J. Laarman and F. Kiemeney, Onze Lieve VrouweGasthuis, Amsterdam; W. Wijns, B. de Bruyne, J. Bartunek, P.de Bruyne, G.R. Heyndrickx, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Kliniek, Aalst,Belgium; J. Fajadet, J. Marco, B. Farah, P. Sousa, and M. Boccalatte,Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; J.L. Guermonprez, HôpitalEuropéen Georges Pompidou, Paris; A. Colombo, C. di Mario,R. Albiero, and N. Corvaja, Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy;A. Bartorelli, S. Galli, F. Fabbiochi, P. Motorsi, D. Trabattoni,and A. Loaldi, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy; G.Guagliumi, O. Valsecchi, M. Tespili, A. Vassileva, and A. Saimo,Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy; F. Molnàr,R.G. Kiss, L. Major, and G. Bokori, Semmelweis Egyetem EgészégtudomanyiKar, Budapest, Hungary; E. Ban Hayashi, I. Sanchez, J. Gaspar,R. Villavicencio, and M.A. Pena Duque, Instituto Nacional deCardiologia, Mexico City, Mexico; J.E. Sousa, E. Sousa, A.S.Abizaid, A. Abizaid, A. Sousa, F. Feres, L.A. Mattos, M. Costa,and R. Staico, Institute Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, SãoPaulo, Brazil; M. Perin, E. Ribeiro, E. Martinez, P. Soares,and F. Demartino, University Hospital of São Paulo, SãoPaulo, Brazil; D. Blanchard and O. Bar, Clinique Saint-Gatien,Tours, France; A. Cribier, H. Eltchaninoff, Centre HospitalierUniversitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France.
Authors/writing members, , Daemen, J., Simoons, M. L., Wijns, W., Bagust, A., Bos, G., Bowen, J. M., Braunwald, E., Camenzind, E., Chevalier, B., DiMario, C., Fajadet, J., Gitt, A., Guagliumi, G., Hillege, H. L., James, S., Juni, P., Kastrati, A., Kloth, S., Kristensen, S. D., Krucoff, M., Legrand, V., Pfisterer, M., Rothman, M., Serruys, P. W., Silber, S., Steg, P. G., Tariah, I., Wallentin, L., Windecker, S. W., Participants in the Forum, , Aimonetti, A., Allocco, D., Baczynska, A., Bagust, A., Berenger, M., Bos, G., Boam, A., Bowen, J.M., Braunwald, E., Calle, J.P., Camenzind, E., Campo, G., Carlier, S., Chevalier, B., Daemen, J., de Schepper, J., Di Bisceglie, G., DiMario, C., Dobbels, H., Fajadet, J., Farb, A., Ghislain, J.C., Gitt, A., Guagliumi, G., Hellbardt, S., Hillege, H.L., ten Hoedt, R., Isaia, C., James, S., de Jong, P., Juni, P., Kastrati, A., Klasen, E., Kloth, S., Kristensen, S.D., Krucoff, M., Legrand, V., Lekehal, M., LeNarz, L., Ni Mhullain, F., Nagai, H., Patteet, A., Paunovic, D., Pfisterer, M., Potgieter, A., Purdy, I., Raveau-Landon, C., Rothman, M., Serruys, P.W., Silber, S., Simoons, M.L., Steg, P.G., Tariah, I., Ternstrom, S., Van Wuytswinkel, J., Waliszewski, M., Wallentin, L., Wijns, W., Windecker, S.W.
(2008). Meeting Report * ESC Forum on Drug Eluting Stents * European Heart House, Nice, 27-28 September 2007. Eur Heart J
0: ehn510v1-10
[Full Text]
Marsboom, G., Archer, S. L.
(2008). Pathways of Proliferation: New Targets to Inhibit the Growth of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Circ. Res.
103: 1047-1049
[Full Text]
Firth, B. G., Cooper, L. M., Fearn, S.
(2008). The Appropriate Role Of Cost-Effectiveness In Determining Device Coverage: A Case Study Of Drug-Eluting Stents. Health Aff (Millwood)
27: 1577-1586
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mehilli, J., Byrne, R. A., Wieczorek, A., Iijima, R., Schulz, S., Bruskina, O., Pache, J., Wessely, R., Schomig, A., Kastrati, A., for the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Re,
(2008). Randomized trial of three rapamycin-eluting stents with different coating strategies for the reduction of coronary restenosis. Eur Heart J
29: 1975-1982
[Abstract][Full Text]
Takano, M., Yamamoto, M., Murakami, D., Inami, S., Okamatsu, K., Seimiya, K., Ohba, T., Seino, Y., Mizuno, K.
(2008). Lack of Association Between Large Angiographic Late Loss and Low Risk of In-Stent Thrombus: Angioscopic Comparison Between Paclitaxel- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents. Circ Cardiovasc Intervent
1: 20-27
[Abstract][Full Text]
Austin, D., Oldroyd, K. G., McConnachie, A., Slack, R., Eteiba, H., Flapan, A. D., Jennings, K. P., Northcote, R. J., Pell, A. C.H., Starkey, I. R., Pell, J. P.
(2008). Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Off-Label Indications: A Propensity Score-Matched Outcome Study. Circ Cardiovasc Intervent
1: 45-52
[Abstract][Full Text]
Shaoliang Chen, , Junjie Zhang, , Fei Ye, , Zhongsheng Zhu, , Song Lin, , Nailiang Tian, , Zhizhong Liu, , Weiyi Fang, , Yundai Chen, , Xuewen Sun, , Kwan, T. W.
(2008). Crush Stenting With Paclitaxel-Eluting or Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. ANGIOLOGY
59: 475-483
[Abstract]
Newsome, L. T., Kutcher, M. A., Royster, R. L.
(2008). Coronary Artery Stents: Part I. Evolution of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Anesth. Analg.
107: 552-569
[Abstract][Full Text]
Booth, J., Clayton, T., Pepper, J., Nugara, F., Flather, M., Sigwart, U., Stables, R. H., on Behalf of the SoS Investigators,
(2008). Randomized, Controlled Trial of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Six-Year Follow-Up From the Stent or Surgery Trial (SoS). Circulation
118: 381-388
[Abstract][Full Text]
Meliga, E., Garcia-Garcia, H. M., Valgimigli, M., Chieffo, A., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Maree, A. O., Cook, S., Reardon, L., Moretti, C., De Servi, S., Palacios, I. F., Windecker, S., Colombo, A., van Domburg, R., Sheiban, I., Serruys, P. W.
(2008). Longest available clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the DELFT (Drug Eluting stent for LeFT main) Registry.. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 2212-2219
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ishii, Y., Sakamoto, S.-i., Kronengold, R. T., Virmani, R., Rivera, E. A., Goldman, S. M., Prechtel, E. J., Hill, J. G., Damiano, R. J. Jr.
(2008). A novel bioengineered small-caliber vascular graft incorporating heparin and sirolimus: Excellent 6-month patency.. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.
135: 1237-1246
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sobel, M., Verhaeghe, R.
(2008). Antithrombotic Therapy for Peripheral Artery Occlusive Disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest
133: 815S-843S
[Abstract][Full Text]
Barilli, A., Visigalli, R., Sala, R., Gazzola, G. C., Parolari, A., Tremoli, E., Bonomini, S., Simon, A., Closs, E. I., Dall'Asta, V., Bussolati, O.
(2008). In human endothelial cells rapamycin causes mTORC2 inhibition and impairs cell viability and function. Cardiovasc Res
78: 563-571
[Abstract][Full Text]
Groeneveld, P. W., Matta, M. A., Greenhut, A. P., Yang, F.
(2008). Drug-Eluting Compared With Bare-Metal Coronary Stents Among Elderly Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 2017-2024
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bhatt, S. H, Hauser, T. H
(2008). Very Late Stent Thrombosis After Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Discontinuation in a Patient with a History of Acute Stent Thrombosis. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
42: 708-712
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hannan, E. L., Racz, M., Holmes, D. R., Walford, G., Sharma, S., Katz, S., Jones, R. H., King, S. B. III
(2008). Comparison of Coronary Artery Stenting Outcomes in the Eras Before and After the Introduction of Drug-Eluting Stents. Circulation
117: 2071-2078
[Abstract][Full Text]
Raja, S. G, Dreyfus, G. D
(2008). Current Status of Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.
16: 164-178
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ricciardi, R., Virnig, B. A., Ogilvie, J. W. Jr, Dahlberg, P. S., Selker, H. P., Baxter, N. N.
(2008). Volume-Outcome Relationship for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in an Era of Decreasing Volume. Arch Surg
143: 338-344
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hannan, E. L., Racz, M., Walford, G., Holmes, D. R., Jones, R. H., Sharma, S., Katz, S., King, S. B. III
(2008). Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents in the Treatment of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv
1: 129-135
[Abstract][Full Text]
van der Hoeven, B. L., Liem, S.-S., Dijkstra, J., Bergheanu, S. C., Putter, H., Antoni, M. L., Atsma, D. E., Bootsma, M., Zeppenfeld, K., Jukema, J. W., Schalij, M. J.
(2008). Stent Malapposition After Sirolimus-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Acute and 9-Month Intravascular Ultrasound Results of the MISSION! Intervention Study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv
1: 192-201
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cheng, C., Tempel, D., Oostlander, A., Helderman, F., Gijsen, F., Wentzel, J., van Haperen, R., Haitsma, D. B., Serruys, P. W., van der Steen, A. F.W., de Crom, R., Krams, R.
(2008). Rapamycin modulates the eNOS vs. shear stress relationship. Cardiovasc Res
78: 123-129
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pinto Slottow, T. L., Waksman, R.
(2008). Overview of the 2007 Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting on the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent. Circulation
117: 1603-1608
[Full Text]
Billinger, M., Beutler, J., Taghetchian, K. R., Remondino, A., Wenaweser, P., Cook, S., Togni, M., Seiler, C., Stettler, C., Eberli, F. R., Luscher, T. F., Wandel, S., Juni, P., Meier, B., Windecker, S.
(2008). Two-year clinical outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients. Eur Heart J
29: 718-725
[Abstract][Full Text]
Abraham, N. G., Kappas, A.
(2008). Pharmacological and Clinical Aspects of Heme Oxygenase. Pharmacol. Rev.
60: 79-127
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hoffmann, R, Morice, M-C, Moses, J W, Fitzgerald, P J, Mauri, L, Breithardt, G, Schofer, J, Serruys, P W, Stoll, H-P, Leon, M B
(2008). Impact of late incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on 4-year clinical events: intravascular ultrasound analysis from the multicentre, randomised, RAVEL, E-SIRIUS and SIRIUS trials. Heart
94: 322-328
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kip, K. E., Hollabaugh, K., Marroquin, O. C., Williams, D. O.
(2008). The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies The Story of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 701-707
[Abstract][Full Text]
van der Hoeven, B. L., Liem, S.-S., Jukema, J. W., Suraphakdee, N., Putter, H., Dijkstra, J., Atsma, D. E., Bootsma, M., Zeppenfeld, K., Oemrawsingh, P. V., van der Wall, E. E., Schalij, M. J.
(2008). Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 9-month angiographic and intravascular ultrasound results and 12-month clinical outcome results from the MISSION! Intervention Study.. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 618-626
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jeremias, A., Kirtane, A.
(2008). Balancing Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. ANN INTERN MED
148: 234-238
[Abstract][Full Text]
Teirstein, P. S.
(2008). Unprotected Left Main Intervention: Patient Selection, Operator Technique, and Clinical Outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv
1: 5-13
[Abstract][Full Text]
Melikian, N, Wijns, W
(2008). Drug-eluting stents: a critique. Heart
94: 145-152
[Abstract][Full Text]
Romagnoli, E., Sangiorgi, G. M., Cosgrave, J., Guillet, E., Colombo, A.
(2008). Drug-Eluting Stenting: The Case for Post-Dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv
1: 22-31
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rogacka, R., Chieffo, A., Michev, I., Airoldi, F., Latib, A., Cosgrave, J., Montorfano, M., Carlino, M., Sangiorgi, G. M., Castelli, A., Godino, C., Magni, V., Aranzulla, T. C., Romagnoli, E., Colombo, A.
(2008). Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation in Patients Taking Chronic Oral Anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv
1: 56-61
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hannan, E. L., Wu, C., Walford, G., Culliford, A. T., Gold, J. P., Smith, C. R., Higgins, R. S.D., Carlson, R. E., Jones, R. H.
(2008). Drug-Eluting Stents vs. Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Multivessel Coronary Disease. NEJM
358: 331-341
[Abstract][Full Text]
Marroquin, O. C., Selzer, F., Mulukutla, S. R., Williams, D. O., Vlachos, H. A., Wilensky, R. L., Tanguay, J.-F., Holper, E. M., Abbott, J. D., Lee, J. S., Smith, C., Anderson, W. D., Kelsey, S. F., Kip, K. E.
(2008). A Comparison of Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting Stents for Off-Label Indications. NEJM
358: 342-352
[Abstract][Full Text]
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso, , 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Upda, , King, S. B. III, Smith, S. C. Jr, Hirshfeld, J. W. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Morrison, D. A., Williams, D. O.
(2008). 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 172-209
[Full Text]
King, S. B. III, Smith, S. C. Jr, Hirshfeld, J. W. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Morrison, D. A., Williams, D. O., 2005 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, , Smith, S. C. Jr, Feldman, T. E., Hirshfeld, J. W. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Kern, M. J., King, S. B. III, Morrison, D. A., O'Neill, W. W., Schaff, H. V., Whitlow, P. L., Williams, D. O., Smith, S. C. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Adams, C. D., Anderson, J. L., Buller, C. E., Creager, M. A., Ettinger, S. M., Halperin, J. L., Hunt, S. A., Krumholz, H. M., Kushner, F. G., Lytle, B. W., Nishimura, R., Page, R. L., Riegel, B., Tarkington, L. G., Yancy, C. W.
(2008). 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. Circulation
117: 261-295
[Full Text]
Pocock, S. J., Lansky, A. J., Mehran, R., Popma, J. J., Fahy, M. P., Na, Y., Dangas, G., Moses, J. W., Pucelikova, T., Kandzari, D. E., Ellis, S. G., Leon, M. B., Stone, G. W.
(2008). Angiographic surrogate end points in drug-eluting stent trials: a systematic evaluation based on individual patient data from 11 randomized, controlled trials.. J Am Coll Cardiol
51: 23-32
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sutphin, D., Stevens, S., Kirzeder, D., Gash, J.
(2008). Acute Thrombosis of a Mesenteric Artery Drug-Eluting Stent Following Clopidogrel Cessation. VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG
41: 564-567
[Abstract]
Wilson, J. M., Willerson, J. T.
(2008). Myocardial Revascularization with Percutaneous Devices. Card Surg Adult
3: 573-598
[Full Text]
Griffith, B. P., Haddad, M., Poston, R. S.
(2008). Immunobiology of Heart and Heart-Lung Transplantation. Card Surg Adult
3: 1513-1538
[Full Text]
Jensen, L. O., Thayssen, P., Thuesen, L., Hansen, H. S., Lassen, J. F., Kelbaek, H., Junker, A., Hansen, K. N., Boetker, H. E., Krusell, L. R., Pedersen, K. E.
(2007). Influence of a Pressure Gradient Distal to Implanted Bare-Metal Stent on In-Stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation
116: 2802-2808
[Abstract][Full Text]
Russo, R. J, Silva, P. D, Yeager, M.
(2007). Coronary artery overexpansion increases neointimal hyperplasia after stent placement in a porcine model. Heart
93: 1609-1615
[Abstract][Full Text]
Solinas, E., Nikolsky, E., Lansky, A. J., Kirtane, A. J., Morice, M.-C., Popma, J. J., Schofer, J., Schampaert, E., Pucelikova, T., Aoki, J., Fahy, M., Dangas, G. D., Moses, J. W., Cutlip, D. E., Leon, M. B., Mehran, R.
(2007). Gender-Specific Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 2111-2116
[Abstract][Full Text]
Williams, D. O., Abbott, J. D.
(2007). Et Tu, Bare Metal Stent?. Circulation
116: 2363-2365
[Full Text]
Colombo, A.
(2007). Directional Coronary Atherectomy and Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents in Selected Bifurcation Lesions: A Logical Combination Waiting Evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 1946-1947
[Full Text]
Palmerini, T., Barlocco, F., Santarelli, A., Bacchi-Reggiani, L., Savini, C., Baldini, E., Alessi, L., Ruffini, M., Di Credico, G., Piovaccari, G., Di Bartolomeo, R., Marzocchi, A., Branzi, A., De Servi, S.
(2007). A comparison between coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and drug eluting stent for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in elderly patients (aged >=75 years). Eur Heart J
28: 2714-2719
[Abstract][Full Text]
Grube, E., Dawkins, K. D., Guagliumi, G., Banning, A. P., Zmudka, K., Colombo, A., Thuesen, L., Hauptman, K., Marco, J., Wijns, W., Popma, J. J., Buellesfeld, L., Koglin, J., Russell, M. E.
(2007). TAXUS VI 2-year follow-up: randomized comparison of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting with bare metal stents for treatment of long, complex lesions. Eur Heart J
28: 2578-2582
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mullenix, P. S., Steele, S. R., Martin, M. J., Starnes, B. W., Andersen, C. A.
(2007). C-reactive Protein Level and Traditional Vascular Risk Factors in the Prediction of Carotid Stenosis. Arch Surg
142: 1066-1071
[Abstract][Full Text]
Das, K. M., El-Menyar, A. A., Salam, A. M., Singh, R., Dabdoob, W. A. K., Albinali, H. A., Al Suwaidi, J.
(2007). Contrast-enhanced 64-Section Coronary Multidetector CT Angiography versus Conventional Coronary Angiography for Stent Assessment. Radiology
245: 424-432
[Abstract][Full Text]
Baumgart, D., Klauss, V., Baer, F., Hartmann, F., Drexler, H., Motz, W., Klues, H., Hofmann, S., Volker, W., Pfannebecker, T., Stoll, H.-P., Nickenig, G., for the SCORPIUS Study Investigators,
(2007). One-Year Results of the SCORPIUS Study: A German Multicenter Investigation on the Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 1627-1634
[Abstract][Full Text]
Morice, M.-C., Serruys, P. W., Barragan, P., Bode, C., Van Es, G.-A., Stoll, H.-P., Snead, D., Mauri, L., Cutlip, D. E., Sousa, E.
(2007). Long-Term Clinical Outcomes With Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Five-Year Results of the RAVEL Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 1299-1304
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kanemitsu, S., Tanaka, K., Tanaka, J., Suzuki, H., Kinoshita, T.
(2007). Initial clinical impact of drug eluting stents on coronary artery bypass graft surgery. ICVTS
6: 632-635
[Abstract][Full Text]
McMurtry, M. S., Bonnet, S., Michelakis, E. D., Bonnet, S., Haromy, A., Archer, S. L.
(2007). Statin therapy, alone or with rapamycin, does not reverse monocrotaline pulmonary arterial hypertension: the rapamcyin-atorvastatin-simvastatin study. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.
293: L933-L940
[Abstract][Full Text]
Okura, H., Taguchi, H., Kubo, T., Toda, I., Yoshiyama, M., Yoshikawa, J., Yoshida, K.
(2007). Impact of arterial remodelling and plaque rupture on target and non-target lesion revascularisation after stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: an intravascular ultrasound study. Heart
93: 1219-1225
[Abstract][Full Text]
Togni, M., Eber, S., Widmer, J., Billinger, M., Wenaweser, P., Cook, S., Vogel, R., Seiler, C., Eberli, F. R., Maier, W., Corti, R., Roffi, M., Luscher, T. F., Garachemani, A., Hess, O. M., Wandel, S., Meier, B., Juni, P., Windecker, S.
(2007). Impact of Vessel Size on Outcome After Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: A Subgroup Analysis of the SIRTAX Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 1123-1131
[Abstract][Full Text]
Colombo, A., Chieffo, A.
(2007). Drug-Eluting Stent Update 2007: Part III: Technique and Unapproved/Unsettled Indications (Left Main, Bifurcations, Chronic Total Occlusions, Small Vessels and Long Lesions, Saphenous Vein Grafts, Acute Myocardial Infarctions, and Multivessel Disease). Circulation
116: 1424-1432
[Full Text]
Rodriguez, A. E., Maree, A. O., Mieres, J., Berrocal, D., Grinfeld, L., Fernandez-Pereira, C., Curotto, V., Rodriguez-Granillo, A., O'Neill, W., Palacios, I. F.
(2007). Late loss of early benefit from drug-eluting stents when compared with bare-metal stents and coronary artery bypass surgery: 3 years follow-up of the ERACI III registry. Eur Heart J
28: 2118-2125
[Abstract][Full Text]
Park, D.-W., Lee, C. W., Yun, S.-C., Kim, Y.-H., Hong, M.-K., Kim, J.-J., Park, S.-W., Park, S.-J.
(2007). Prognostic impact of preprocedural C reactive protein levels on 6-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. Heart
93: 1087-1092
[Abstract][Full Text]
Awata, M., Kotani, J.-i., Uematsu, M., Morozumi, T., Watanabe, T., Onishi, T., Iida, O., Sera, F., Nanto, S., Hori, M., Nagata, S.
(2007). Serial Angioscopic Evidence of Incomplete Neointimal Coverage After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Comparison With Bare-Metal Stents. Circulation
116: 910-916
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jimenez-Quevedo, P., Sabate, M., Angiolillo, D. J., Alfonso, F., Hernandez-Antolin, R., SanMartin, M., Gomez-Hospital, J. A., Banuelos, C., Escaned, J., Moreno, R., Fernandez, C., Fernandez-Aviles, F., Macaya, C., for the DIABETES Investigators,
(2007). Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients with de novo coronary stenoses: long-term results of the DIABETES trial. Eur Heart J
28: 1946-1952
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kawatsu, S., Oda, K., Saiki, Y., Tabata, Y., Tabayashi, K.
(2007). External Application of Rapamycin-Eluting Film at Anastomotic Sites Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia in a Canine Model. Ann. Thorac. Surg.
84: 560-567
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jensen, L. O., Thayssen, P., Lassen, J. F., Hansen, H. S., Kelbaek, H., Junker, A., Pedersen, K. E., Hansen, K. N., Krusell, L. R., Botker, H. E., Thuesen, L.
(2007). Recruitable collateral blood flow index predicts coronary instent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J
28: 1820-1826
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bode, C., Zehender, M.
(2007). The use of antiplatelet agents following percutaneous coronary intervention: focus on late stent thrombosis. Eur Heart J Suppl
9: D10-D19
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jensen, L. O., Maeng, M., Kaltoft, A., Thayssen, P., Hansen, H. H. T., Bottcher, M., Lassen, J. F., Krussel, L. R., Rasmussen, K., Hansen, K. N., Pedersen, L., Johnsen, S. P., Soerensen, H. T., Thuesen, L.
(2007). Stent Thrombosis, Myocardial Infarction, and Death After Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stent Coronary Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 463-470
[Abstract][Full Text]
Vermeersch, P., Agostoni, P., Verheye, S., Van den Heuvel, P., Convens, C., Van den Branden, F., Van Langenhove, G., DELAYED RRISC (Death and Events at Long-term follo,
(2007). Increased Late Mortality After Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts: Results From the Randomized DELAYED RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 261-267
[Abstract][Full Text]
Valgimigli, M., Campo, G., Arcozzi, C., Malagutti, P., Carletti, R., Ferrari, F., Barbieri, D., Parrinello, G., Percoco, G., Ferrari, R.
(2007). Two-Year Clinical Follow-Up After Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stent Implantation Assisted by Systematic Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Infusion in Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Results From the STRATEGY Study. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 138-145
[Abstract][Full Text]
Holmes, D. R. Jr, Kereiakes, D. J., Laskey, W. K., Colombo, A., Ellis, S. G., Henry, T. D., Popma, J. J., Serruys, P. W.J.C., Kimura, T., Williams, D. O., Windecker, S., Krucoff, M. W.
(2007). Thrombosis and Drug-Eluting Stents: An Objective Appraisal. J Am Coll Cardiol
50: 109-118
[Abstract][Full Text]
Moreno, R., Fernandez, C., Sanchez-Recalde, A., Galeote, G., Calvo, L., Alfonso, F., Hernandez, R., Sanchez-Aquino, R., Angiolillo, D. J., Villarreal, S., Macaya, C., Lopez-Sendon, J. L.
(2007). Clinical impact of in-stent late loss after drug-eluting coronary stent implantation. Eur Heart J
28: 1583-1591
[Abstract][Full Text]
Weissman, N. J., Ellis, S. G., Grube, E., Dawkins, K. D., Greenberg, J. D., Mann, T., Cannon, L. A., Cambier, P. A., Fernandez, S., Mintz, G. S., Mandinov, L., Koglin, J., Stone, G. W.
(2007). Effect of the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent on vascular tissue responses: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound integrated analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials. Eur Heart J
28: 1574-1582
[Abstract][Full Text]
Marzocchi, A., Saia, F., Piovaccari, G., Manari, A., Aurier, E., Benassi, A., Cremonesi, A., Percoco, G., Varani, E., Magnavacchi, P., Guastaroba, P., Grilli, R., Maresta, A.
(2007). Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents: Two-Year Results of the REAL (REgistro AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia Romagna) Multicenter Registry. Circulation
115: 3181-3188
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cademartiri, F., Schuijf, J. D., Pugliese, F., Mollet, N. R., Jukema, J. W., Maffei, E., Kroft, L. J., Palumbo, A., Ardissino, D., Serruys, P. W., Krestin, G. P., Van der Wall, E. E., de Feyter, P. J., Bax, J. J.
(2007). Usefulness of 64-Slice Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography to Assess In-Stent Restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol
49: 2204-2210
[Abstract][Full Text]
Brilakis, E. S., Banerjee, S., Berger, P. B.
(2007). Perioperative Management of Patients With Coronary Stents. J Am Coll Cardiol
49: 2145-2150
[Abstract][Full Text]
Stone, G. W., Ellis, S. G., Colombo, A., Dawkins, K. D., Grube, E., Cutlip, D. E., Friedman, M., Baim, D. S., Koglin, J.
(2007). Offsetting Impact of Thrombosis and Restenosis on the Occurrence of Death and Myocardial Infarction After Paclitaxel-Eluting and Bare Metal Stent Implantation. Circulation
115: 2842-2847
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wong, S. H, Wan, S., Underwood, M. J
(2007). Myocardial Revascularization: Surgery or Stenting?. Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.
15: 264-269
[Abstract][Full Text]
Siqueira, D. A., Abizaid, A. A., Costa, J. d. R., Feres, F., Mattos, L. A., Staico, R., Abizaid, A. A., Tanajura, L. F., Chaves, A., Centemero, M., Sousa, A. G.M.R., Sousa, J. E. M.R.
(2007). Late incomplete apposition after drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence and potential for adverse clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J
28: 1304-1309
[Abstract][Full Text]
Maeng, M., Okkels Jensen, L., Rasmussen, K., Flensted Lassen, J., Romer Krusell, L., Thayssen, P., Thuesen, L.
(2007). Target lesion revascularisation in patients treated with a sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stent. Heart
93: 694-697
[Abstract][Full Text]
Falcone, E. L., Tangri, N.
(2007). Drug-eluting stents. CMAJ
176: 1611-1611
[Full Text]