A Deletion Involving the Connexin 30 Gene in Nonsyndromic Hearing Impairment
Ignacio del Castillo, Ph.D., Manuela Villamar, Ph.D., Miguel A. Moreno-Pelayo, Ph.D., Francisco J. del Castillo, Ph.D., Araceli Álvarez, M.Sc., Dolores Tellería, M.Sc., Ibis Menéndez, M.D., and Felipe Moreno, Ph.D.
Background Inherited hearing impairment affects about 1 in 2000newborns. Up to 50 percent of all patients with autosomal recessivenonsyndromic prelingual deafness in different populations havemutations in the gene encoding the gap-junction protein connexin26 (GJB2) at locus DFNB1 on chromosome 13q12. However, a largefraction (10 to 42 percent) of patients with GJB2 mutationshave only one mutant allele; the accompanying mutation has notbeen identified. DFNB1-linked familial cases with no mutationin GJB2 have also been reported.
Methods We evaluated 33 unrelated probands with nonsyndromicprelingual deafness who had only one GJB2 mutant allele. Ninesubjects had evidence of linkage to DFNB1. We used haplotypeanalysis for markers on 13q12 to search for mutations otherthan the one involving GJB2.
Results We identified a 342-kb deletion in the gene encodingconnexin 30 (GJB6), a protein that is reported to be expressedwith connexin 26 in the inner ear. The deletion extended distallyto GJB2, which remained intact. The break-point junction ofthe deletion was isolated and sequenced, and a specific diagnostictest was developed for this common mutation. Twenty-two of the33 subjects were heterozygous for both the GJB6 and GJB2 mutations,including all 9 with evidence of linkage to DFNB1. Two subjectswere homozygous for the GJB6 mutation.
Conclusions A 342-kb deletion in GJB6 is the second most frequentmutation causing prelingual deafness in the Spanish population.Our data suggest that mutations in the complex locus DFNB1,which contains two genes (GJB2 and GJB6), can result in a monogenicor a digenic pattern of inheritance of prelingual deafness.
Hearing impairment affects about 1 in 1000 newborns.1 Casesthat are present before the development of speech (prelingualonset) hamper speech acquisition and, therefore, normal communicationand social integration. Early detection is essential for theapplication of palliative treatments and special education.Since about 50 percent of the cases of hearing impairment havegenetic causes,1 molecular diagnosis and genetic counselingare needed. However, the main obstacle to molecular diagnosisis the extreme genetic heterogeneity of nonsyndromic hearingimpairment. Most cases of genetic deafness are autosomal recessive.So far, 28 loci for autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearingimpairment have been identified, which are referred to as DFNBloci, and 10 genes have been sequenced (their descriptions areavailable at http://www.uia.ac.be/dnalab/hhh). Mutations inthe gene encoding the gap-junction protein connexin 26 (GJB2)at the DFNB1 locus on chromosome 13q12 are responsible for upto 50 percent of all cases of autosomal recessive nonsyndromicprelingual deafness in every population tested.2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13Six monomers of connexin bind together to form a hexamer (connexon)in the plasma membrane, and each connexon binds another connexonin an adjacent cell to form an intercellular channel.14,15 Connexin26 gap-junction channels are thought to have a role in recyclingthe potassium that enters the hair cells as part of the mechanismof auditory signal transduction.16,17
Anywhere from 10 to 42 percent of patients with GJB2 mutationshave only one mutant GJB2 allele,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,18and some familial cases have evidence of linkage to the DFNB1locus but have no mutation in GJB2.2,5 It was therefore postulatedthat another gene close to GJB2 might be responsible for thesecases.2,4,6,12,19 The gene encoding connexin 30 (GJB6) was anobvious candidate, since connexin 30 is expressed in the sameinner-ear structures as connexin 26 and both connexins are functionallyrelated.20,21 However, previous molecular studies did not revealany mutation in GJB6 that was associated with autosomal recessivehearing impairment.12,19,22 We sought to identify a mutationin this gene.
Methods
Subjects
We enrolled 422 unrelated families (364 from Spain and 58 fromCuba) that had members with prelingual, sensorineural, nonsyndromichearing impairment. A total of 167 Spanish and 26 Cuban familieshad at least two affected members and an autosomal recessivepattern of inheritance (familial cases), and 197 Spanish and32 Cuban families had only one affected member (sporadic cases).Familial cases included 52 Spanish and 5 Cuban sibships and115 Spanish and 21 Cuban families with affected members in morethan one generation.
Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjectsincluded in the study or their parents. Family members withfeatures of syndromic hearing impairment, as well as those withputative environmental causes, were excluded on the basis oftheir history and findings on clinical examination. Otoscopicexamination, tympanometry with acoustic reflex testing, andtuning-fork tests were carried out systematically to rule outa conductive hearing loss. Pure-tone audiometry was performedto evaluate air conduction (frequencies, 250 to 8000 Hz) andbone conduction (frequencies, 250 to 4000 Hz).
Genetic Techniques
DNA was extracted from peripheral blood according to standardprocedures. The primers and conditions for polymerase-chain-reaction(PCR) amplification of the microsatellite markers have beendescribed previously.23,24,25 Other primers and PCR conditionsare described in Supplementary Appendix 1, available with thefull text of this article at http://www.nejm.org. Fluorescentlylabeled alleles were analyzed with an ABI Prism 310 GeneticAnalyzer (Applied Biosystems). Mutation detection was performedby heteroduplex analysis on Mutation Detection Enhancement gels(MDE, FMC Bioproducts) as described previously.26,27 DNA sequencingwas performed in an ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer.
Southern Blotting
Total digests of genomic DNA (15 µg) were blotted ontoZeta-Probe GT membranes (Bio-Rad). Probes were labeled by randompriming with [32P]deoxycytidine triphosphate with the use ofthe High Prime kit (Roche). Hybridization was performed witha moderate level of stringency in Church buffer (0.5 M sodiumphosphate buffer at a pH of 7.2, 7 percent sodium dodecyl sulfate,and 1 mM EDTA at a pH of 8.0) at 65°C overnight. Membraneswere washed three times in 2x standard sodium citrate buffer(300 mM sodium chloride and 30 mM sodium citrate) with 0.1 percentsodium dodecyl sulfate at 65°C and exposed to Kodak X-OMATAR film for 10 days at 30°C.
Results
A total of 422 unrelated subjects from Spain and Cuba who hadprelingual nonsyndromic hearing impairment with a mode of inheritancethat was compatible with an autosomal recessive pattern wereassessed for mutations in GJB2. Of these 422 subjects, 129 hadmutations in both alleles of GJB2, 249 had no identifiable mutationin GJB2, and 44 had a mutation in one allele of the gene butno mutations in either the coding region or the splice sitesof the other allele. The 44 heterozygous subjects and theirrelatives underwent genotyping for four microsatellite markers(D13S141, D13S175, D13S1275, and D13S292) that are close toGJB2 on 13q12.23,24 Haplotype analysis for these markers ruledout linkage to DFNB1 in 11 subjects, suggesting that they werecoincidental carriers of the mutation; this result was expected,given the high carrier frequency of GJB2 mutations in the Spanishpopulation (2.5 percent for the most frequent mutation, thedeletion of guanine at position 35 [35delG])28 (and unpublisheddata). In 24 subjects, haplotype analysis was not informative.Finally, nine subjects (eight Spanish and one Cuban) had findingsindicative of linkage to DFNB1, suggesting that another mutationon 13q12 accompanied the GJB2 mutation.
Haplotype analysis also yielded two unexpected results. First,the lack of consistency in the segregation of the alleles ofmarker D13S175 in nine families suggested the presence of anunamplifiable allele. Second, the two affected daughters (SubjectsII-1 and II-2 in Figure 1) of parents who had severe deafnessand who were heterozygous for the 35delG mutation in GJB2 hadinherited the wild-type GJB2 allele from each parent, as shownby direct testing and haplotype analysis. It was not possibleto amplify marker D13S175 from Subjects II-1 and II-2, withthe use of either a pair of primers described in the literature23or an alternative primer pair designed on the basis of the sequencesflanking the (CA)n repeat. These results were consistent withthe occurrence of a deletion involving at least the D13S175marker.
Figure 1. Map of the Region of GJB6 on Chromosome 13q12 Affected by the 342-kb Deletion, Referred to as the (GJB6-D13S1830) Deletion (Panel A); Map of Exon 3 of GJB6 (Panel B); and Pedigree and Results of Southern Blot Analysis of One Spanish Family (Panels C and D).
Panel A shows a 600-kb DNA segment that includes the segment affected by the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletion and flanking sequences (National Center for Biotechnology Information accession number, NT_009917.3). The positions of the seven markers and four sequence-tagged sites (STS) are indicated. The location of two other genes in the region is shown: the gene encoding -crystallin (LOC51084) and the gene that encodes probe hTg737 (TG737 ), which has been implicated in polycystic kidney disease. The two break points of the deletion are marked by vertical arrows, and the extent of the deletion is indicated by the dashed line. Panel B shows the 4-kb segment of DNA that contains the third exon of the GJB6 gene and flanking sequences. UTR denotes untranslated region, and CDS coding sequence. Restriction sites, either PstI or SspI, are indicated. The positions of the probes used in the Southern blot analysis are indicated below exon 3. The arrowhead indicates the deletion break point within GJB6. Panel C shows the results of Southern blot analysis in a Spanish family with severe deafness. Probe 2R was used on SspI digests of genomic DNA. A 2.2-kb wild-type (WT) band is present in the control subject and the parents. This band is absent in both children. Panel D shows the results of Southern blot analysis in the same family with probe 1R on SspI digests of genomic DNA. In addition to the 2.2-kb band, a novel 2.9-kb band, created by the deletion (del), appears faintly in the parents (both of whom are heterozygous) and more clearly in the children (both of whom are homozygous) and is absent in the control subject. Circles indicate female family members, and squares male family members.
To confirm and determine the extent of the deletion in thisSpanish family, we tested Subjects II-1 and II-2 for sequencevariance in GJB6, a gene very close to D13S175 (Figure 1A).A DNA fragment corresponding to the entire coding region ofGJB6 could not be amplified by PCR in these two subjects. Todetermine whether the deletion of GJB6 was total or partial,we evaluated four overlapping DNA fragments (labeled A, B, C,and D in Figure 1B) spanning the entire coding region usingPCR amplification. Fragment D was amplified, but fragments A,B, and C were not. We concluded that the deletion truncatedthe GJB6 open reading frame between nucleotides 367 and 574(the proximal break point). The partial deletion of GJB6 wasconfirmed by Southern blotting (Figure 1C and Figure 1D).
To determine the distal break point of the deletion, we usedPCR to amplify a set of sequence-tagged sites, which have beendescribed or were developed by us during this work, from SubjectsII-1 and II-2 (Figure 1A). Combining the results obtained foreach sequence-tagged site with the data provided by the Southernblotting, we identified an interval that should contain thedistal break point. We developed a specific PCR assay to amplifythe break-point junction of the deletion. As expected, no PCRproduct was obtained from control subjects with normal hearing,but a 460-bp DNA fragment was obtained from both of the childrenand their parents. Sequencing of the PCR product from each parentyielded the same break-point junction (Figure 2A), indicatingthat both children were homozygous for the deletion. The deletionspanned 342 kb, and an examination of the break-point junctionshowed that the deletion involved moderately similar sequencesalong a very short stretch (Figure 2B), suggesting a molecularmechanism based on illegitimate recombination. We named thisdeletion (GJB6-D13S1830).
Figure 2. Break-Point Junction of the (GJB6-D13S1830) Deletion.
Panel A shows the DNA sequences flanking the break-point junction. A DNA segment containing the break-point junction was amplified by PCR and sequenced. The plot shown corresponds to the junction of the proximal and distal break points and flanking sequences. Each peak in the plot corresponds to a nucleotide in the sequence; each base is denoted by a color: green indicates adenine (A), black indicates guanine (G), blue indicates cytosine (C), and red indicates thymine (T). The directions of the centromere and telomere of the long arm of chromosome 13 are indicated to show the orientation of the sequenced DNA fragment. The mutant GJB6 gene lacks its promoter and its first two exons, and its open reading frame is truncated between nucleotides 443 and 444; the remaining 3' part of the gene is fused to a sequence approximately 342 kb distal to GJB6. No fusion protein is formed between the truncated GJB6 coding region and the sequences sent upstream by the deletion, because an in-frame TGA stop codon precedes the break-point junction. Panel B shows the alignment of the sequences flanking the proximal and distal break points. The sequences fused by the deletion are shown in boldface type. The alignment was performed with the use of the PCGENE software package (version 6.50) and showed homology of 50 percent along 58 nucleotides.
We used the PCR assay specific for the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletionto evaluate 282 subjects with genetically uncharacterized casesof prelingual nonsyndromic hearing impairment and 200 controlsubjects with normal hearing (Table 1). We sequenced all thebreak-point junctions identified by screening and confirmedthe presence of the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletion. The deletion wasfound in all nine of the subjects with evidence of linkage toDFNB1 (Table 1). The deletion was not found in the 200 unrelatedcontrol subjects. To determine the evolutionary origin of thisfrequent mutation, we performed a haplotype analysis for markersD13S141 and D13S1831, which flank the deletion break point andwhich are normally separated by about 660 kb (but only by 320kb once the deletion has taken place). In our subjects, thedeletion was associated with two different haplotypes, bothof which had the same allele for D13S141.
Table 1. Results of Screening for the 342-kb Deletion in GJB6.
Discussion
Nonsyndromic prelingual hearing impairment is difficult to diagnoseby molecular means, because many genes are involved and thereis insufficient knowledge of the individual contribution ofeach gene and its mutations. Therefore, most genetic analysesinclude routine molecular diagnosis for mutations in the GJB2gene, since such mutations are the cause of up to 50 percentof the cases. However, the diagnostic techniques reveal onlyone mutant GJB2 allele in a substantial proportion of patients.Although unexplained cases may be attributable in part to intrinsicdrawbacks in the techniques for the detection of mutations orto the high frequency of carriers in the population, it haslong been suspected that other mutations are present in a geneor genes in the same chromosomal region. We identified a novelmutation a deletion that truncates the GJB6 gene butdoes not affect the GJB2 gene that frequently accompanieda mutation in a single GJB2 allele (i.e., a double heterozygousstate) in our group of subjects with unexplained cases of nonsyndromicprelingual hearing impairment.
The frequent occurrence of subjects who were heterozygous forboth the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletion and point mutations in GJB2could be explained on the basis of either a monogenic or a digenicpattern of inheritance. In the case of a monogenic mode of inheritance,there must be a regulatory element that is essential for theexpression of the GJB2 gene in the inner ear. This hypotheticalelement would be located far upstream of GJB2 and GJB6, andthe deletion of this element would suppress the level of expressionof GJB2 enough to produce a phenotype of hearing impairment.However, the existence of the GJB2 regulatory element remainsmerely hypothetical. An alternative interpretation would bethat the deletion inactivates a second gene whose protein productis functionally related to connexin 26. Substantial experimentalevidence supports the hypothesis that GJB6 is this postulatedsecond gene. First, connexin 26 and connexin 30 are both expressedin the spiral limbus, the spiral ligament, and the stria vascularisand among the supporting cells of the organ of Corti in ratcochlea.20,21 Both connexins were also detected in the lateralwall of the inner ear in a 22-week-old human fetus.21 Second,connexin 26 and connexin 30 monomers can bind each other toform heterotypic, or mixed, gap-junction channels.29 Third,a mutation in GJB6 was reported in a family with autosomal dominanthearing impairment.22 Finally, in the current study, we identifiedthree deaf patients (two patients in the family whose pedigreeis shown in Figure 1 and one additional patient) who lackeda functional GJB6 gene but who had two intact GJB2 alleles.
Altogether, these data support the concept that DFNB1 is a complexlocus containing two genes (GJB2 and GJB6) and that the lossof any two of the four alleles from these genes results in hearingimpairment. In other words, patients with a prelingual hearingimpairment could be homozygous for point mutations that inactivateGJB6 alleles or heterozygous for both the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletionand mutant GJB2 alleles. This type of complex pattern of inheritancehas already been reported in other recessive disorders, notablyretinitis pigmentosa.30 However, these hypothetical mutationsin GJB6 have not yet been identified.12,19,22 Although the presenceof the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletion may have hampered the detectionof point mutations in some screening studies, the high frequencyof negative results suggests that if these mutations exist,they must be rare. Screening for GJB6 mutations in other populationsshould help clarify this point.
Currently, only two genes in the region affected by the deletionhave been sequenced: GJB6 and the gene encoding -crystallin(LOC51084), a component of the lens of the eye (the sequenceis available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink). Differentmissense mutations in GJB6 are responsible for autosomal dominanthearing loss22 or autosomal dominant hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia,31probably because they encode dysfunctional proteins or causedominant negative effects. However, to our knowledge, no pathogenicmutation in LOC51084 has been reported. Although we found nosigns of skin or eye disorders in the three subjects who werehomozygous for the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletion, all of them arestill children. Thus, careful follow-up of their clinical statuswill be needed to settle this point.
Our findings indicate that the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletion is thesecond most frequent (after the 35delG mutation in GJB2) geneticcause of nonsyndromic prelingual hearing impairment in the Spanishpopulation. The frequency of this deletion in other populationsremains to be determined, but the deletion of marker D13S175has been demonstrated in at least one familial case of prelingualdeafness in New Zealand.32 When the current report was in press,Lerer et al.33 reported a deletion involving the GJB6 gene inseven patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss from four unrelatedAshkenazi Jewish families. Since they did not isolate the break-pointjunction of the deletion, we do not know whether the mutationis the same as the one we report in the current article. Allthese reports, taken together, should provide new insight intothe role of connexins in the auditory system. The relativelylarge percentages worldwide of patients with unexplained casesof prelingual deafness who are heterozygous for the GJB2 mutationsuggest that the (GJB6-D13S1830) deletion or other, similarmutations are also widespread. Our results also indicate thatthe deletion of large portions of a chromosome can easily bemissed with the use of the usual mutation-detection assays,even though they may have a high prevalence in human disease.
Supported by grants from the European Community (QLG2-CT-1999-00988),the Comision Asesora Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologiaof the Spanish Ministerio de la Ciencia (SAF99-0025), and theSpanish Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS 00/0244). Dr.Villamar, Dr. Francisco del Castillo, and Ms. Álvarezwere recipients of fellowships from the Comunidad de Madrid,Fundación Organizacion Nacional de Ciegos Españoles,and the Spanish Ministerio de Sanidad, respectively.
We are indebted to the families and the clinicians who participatedin this study, to the Federacion Española de Asociacionesde Padres y Amigos de los Sordos for their enthusiastic supportof this research, and to Luis C. Barrio for useful discussion.
Source Information
From the Unidad de Genética Molecular, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid (I.C., M.V., M.A.M.-P., F.J.C., A.A., D.T., F.M.); and the Departamento de Genética, Hospital Pediátrico William Soler, Havana, Cuba (I.M.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Moreno at the Unidad de Genética Molecular, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar km. 9, 28034, Madrid, Spain, or at fmoreno{at}hrc.insalud.es.
References
Cohen MM Jr, Gorlin RJ. Epidemiology, etiology, and genetic patterns. In: Gorlin RJ, Toriello HV, Cohen MM Jr, eds. Hereditary hearing loss and its syndromes. Oxford monographs on medical genetics. No. 28. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995:9-21.
Estivill X, Fortina P, Surrey S, et al. Connexin-26 mutations in sporadic and inherited sensorineural deafness. Lancet 1998;351:394-398. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kelley PM, Harris DJ, Comer BC, et al. Novel mutations in the connexin 26 gene (GJB2) that cause autosomal recessive (DFNB1) hearing loss. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:792-799. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lench N, Houseman M, Newton V, Van Camp G, Mueller R. Connexin-26 mutations in sporadic non-syndromal sensorineural deafness. Lancet 1998;351:415-415. [Web of Science][Medline]
Scott DA, Kraft ML, Carmi R, et al. Identification of mutations in the connexin 26 gene that cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss. Hum Mutat 1998;11:387-394. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Denoyelle F, Marlin S, Weil D, et al. Clinical features of the prevalent form of childhood deafness, DFNB1, due to a connexin-26 gene defect: implications for genetic counselling. Lancet 1999;353:1298-1303. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Murgia A, Orzan E, Polli R, et al. Cx26 deafness: mutation analysis and clinical variability. J Med Genet 1999;36:829-832. [Free Full Text]
Abe S, Usami S, Shinkawa H, Kelley PM, Kimberling WJ. Prevalent connexin 26 gene (GJB2) mutations in Japanese. J Med Genet 2000;37:41-43. [Free Full Text]
Rabionet R, Zelante L, López-Bigas N, et al. Molecular basis of childhood deafness resulting from mutations in the GJB2 (connexin 26) gene. Hum Genet 2000;106:40-44. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sobe T, Vreugde S, Shahin H, et al. The prevalence and expression of inherited connexin 26 mutations associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss in the Israeli population. Hum Genet 2000;106:50-57. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wilcox SA, Saunders K, Osborn AH, et al. High frequency hearing loss correlated with mutations in the GJB2 gene. Hum Genet 2000;106:399-405. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gabriel H, Kupsch P, Sudendey J, Winterhager E, Jahnke K, Lautermann J. Mutations in the connexin26/GJB2 gene are the most common event in non-syndromic hearing loss among the German population. Hum Mutat 2001;17:521-522. [Medline]
Löffler J, Nekahm D, Hirst-Stadlmann A, et al. Sensorineural hearing loss and the incidence of Cx26 mutations in Austria. Eur J Hum Genet 2001;9:226-230. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Goodenough DA, Goliger JA, Paul DL. Connexins, connexons, and intercellular communication. Annu Rev Biochem 1996;65:475-502. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Spicer SS, Schulte BA. The fine structure of spiral ligament cells relates to ion return to the stria and varies with place-frequency. Hear Res 1996;100:80-100. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Spicer SS, Schulte BA. Evidence for a medial K+ recycling pathway from inner hair cells. Hear Res 1998;118:1-12. [CrossRef][Medline]
Wilcox SA, Osborn AH, Allen-Powell DR, Maw MA, Dahl HH, Gardner RJ. Connexin26 deafness in several interconnected families. J Med Genet 1999;36:383-385. [Free Full Text]
Kelley PM, Abe S, Askew JW, Smith SD, Usami S, Kimberling WJ. Human connexin 30 (GJB6), a candidate gene for nonsyndromic hearing loss: molecular cloning, tissue-specific expression, and assignment to chromosome 13q12. Genomics 1999;62:172-176. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lautermann J, ten Cate WJ, Altenhoff P, et al. Expression of the gap-junction connexins 26 and 30 in the rat cochlea. Cell Tissue Res 1998;294:415-420. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Lautermann J, Frank HG, Jahnke K, Traub O, Winterhager E. Developmental expression patterns of connexin26 and -30 in the rat cochlea. Dev Genet 1999;25:306-311. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Grifa A, Wagner CA, D'Ambrosio L, et al. Mutations in GJB6 cause nonsyndromic autosomal dominant deafness at DFNA3 locus. Nat Genet 1999;23:16-18. [Web of Science][Medline]
Dib C, Fauré S, Fizames C, et al. A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites. Nature 1996;380:152-154. [CrossRef][Medline]
Hudson TJ, Engelstein M, Lee MK, et al. Isolation and chromosomal assignment of 100 highly informative human simple sequence repeat polymorphisms. Genomics 1992;13:622-629. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kibar Z, Dube MP, Powell J, et al. Clouston hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED): genetic homogeneity, presence of a founder effect in the French Canadian population and fine genetic mapping. Eur J Hum Genet 2000;8:372-380. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
White MB, Carvalho M, Derse D, O'Brien SJ, Dean M. Detecting single base substitutions as heteroduplex polymorphisms. Genomics 1992;12:301-306. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Keen J, Lester D, Inglehearn C, Curtis A, Bhattacharya S. Rapid detection of single base mismatches as heteroduplexes on hydrolink gels. Trends Genet 1991;7:5-5. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gasparini P, Rabionet R, Barbujani G, et al. High carrier frequency of the 35delG deafness mutation in European populations. Eur J Hum Genet 2000;8:19-23. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Dahl E, Manthey D, Chen Y, et al. Molecular cloning and functional expression of mouse connexin-30, a gap junction gene highly expressed in adult brain and skin. J Biol Chem 1996;271:17903-17910. [Erratum, J Biol Chem 1996;271:26444.] [Free Full Text]
Kajiwara K, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Digenic retinitis pigmentosa due to mutations at the unlinked peripherin/RDS and ROM1 loci. Science 1994;264:1064-1068.
Lamartine J, Munhoz Essenfelder G, Kibar Z, et al. Mutations in GJB6 cause hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Nat Genet 2000;26:142-144. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Maw MA, Allen-Powell DR, Goodey RJ, et al. The contribution of the DFNB1 locus to neurosensory deafness in a Caucasian population. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:629-635. [Web of Science][Medline]
Lerer I, Sagi M, Ben-Neriah Z, et al. A deletion mutation in GJB6 cooperating with a GJB2 mutation in trans in non-syndromic deafness: a novel founder mutation in Ashkenazi Jews. Hum Mutat 2001;18:460-460. [Medline]
Appendix
Supplementary Appendix 1
A pair of primers was designed to amplify marker D13S175. Theforward primer was 5'GTTGGTCAAAGGGTACAAACTTG3', and the reverseprimer was 5'ATTACCGCAATCAAACTAAATAACTA3'. Four pairs of primerswere used to amplify four overlapping fragments (A, B, C, andD) of the GJB6 coding region. Forward primer Cx30-1 (5'TCAGGGATAAACCAGCGCAAT3')and reverse primer Cx30-2 (5'ACACCGGGAAAAAGTGGTCAT3') were usedto amplify fragment A. Forward primer Cx30-3 (5'GCAAGAGGACTTCGTCTGCAACA3')and reverse primer Cx30-4 (5'CGGAAAAAGATGCTGCTGGTGT3') wereused to amplify fragment B. Forward primer Cx30-5 (5'AAGCACAAGGTTCGGATAGAGG3')and reverse primer Cx30-6 (5'AGCAGCAGGTAGCACAACTCTG3') wereused to amplify fragment C. Forward primer Cx30-7 (5'CCATTTTTATGATTTCTGCGTCTG3')and reverse primer Cx30-8 (5'GTTGGTATTGCCTTCTGGAGAAGA3') wereused to amplify fragment D. The entire coding region was amplifiedwith the use of primers Cx30-1 and Cx30-8. Probe 1R was amplifiedwith the use of primers GJB6-1F (5'TGGGGGACGCTGCACACTTT3') andGJB6-1R (5'TTTAGGGCATGATTGGGGTGATTT3'). Probe 2R was amplifiedwith the use of primers GJB6-1F and GJB6-2R (5'TGCGAGTGGTTTCGTGCCTGTA3').
Two pairs of primers were developed for the sequence-taggedsites. Forward primer 5'GAAAGGAAGGTCGGGCAAGGT3' and reverseprimer 5'CACAATCAAACCTCACTGCCATCTT3' were developed for STS-CX650.Forward primer 5'GTTGCTTGTGCTTTTGGTGTCAT3' and reverse primer5'AGCCCAGAAACAAACCCTTACATA3' were developed for STS-CX680. Primersused in the polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay specific forthe (GJB6-D13S1830) deletion were forward primer GJB6-1R andreverse primer BKR-1 (5'CACCATGCGTAGCCTTAACCATTTT3').
All PCR amplifications were performed with use of a Perkin-ElmerGeneAmp PCR System 9600, according to the following program:1 cycle of denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes; 5 cyclesof denaturation at 96°C for 15 seconds, with annealing for15 seconds at 68°C for the first cycle and a reduction intemperature of 1°C for each of the next 4 cycles and extensionat 72°C for 30 seconds; 25 cycles of denaturation at 96°Cfor 15 seconds, with annealing for 15 seconds at 63°C andextension at 72°C for 30 seconds; and a final period ofextension at 72°C for 10 minutes.
Ortolano, S., Di Pasquale, G., Crispino, G., Anselmi, F., Mammano, F., Chiorini, J. A.
(2008). Coordinated control of connexin 26 and connexin 30 at the regulatory and functional level in the inner ear. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 18776-18781
[Abstract][Full Text]
Nozu, K, Inagaki, T, Fu, X J, Nozu, Y, Kaito, H, Kanda, K, Sekine, T, Igarashi, T, Nakanishi, K, Yoshikawa, N, Iijima, K, Matsuo, M
(2008). Molecular analysis of digenic inheritance in Bartter syndrome with sensorineural deafness. J. Med. Genet.
45: 182-186
[Abstract][Full Text]
Matos, T D, Caria, H, Simoes-Teixeira, H, Aasen, T, Nickel, R, Jagger, D J, O'Neill, A, Kelsell, D P, Fialho, G
(2007). A novel hearing loss-related mutation occurring in the GJB2 basal promoter. J. Med. Genet.
44: 721-725
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kamiya, K., Fujinami, Y., Hoya, N., Okamoto, Y., Kouike, H., Komatsuzaki, R., Kusano, R., Nakagawa, S., Satoh, H., Fujii, M., Matsunaga, T.
(2007). Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation Accelerates Hearing Recovery through the Repair of Injured Cochlear Fibrocytes. Am. J. Pathol.
171: 214-226
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ahmad, S., Tang, W., Chang, Q., Qu, Y., Hibshman, J., Li, Y., Sohl, G., Willecke, K., Chen, P., Lin, X.
(2007). Restoration of connexin26 protein level in the cochlea completely rescues hearing in a mouse model of human connexin30-linked deafness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 1337-1341
[Abstract][Full Text]
Zariwala, M. A., Leigh, M. W., Ceppa, F., Kennedy, M. P., Noone, P. G., Carson, J. L., Hazucha, M. J., Lori, A., Horvath, J., Olbrich, H., Loges, N. T., Bridoux, A.-M., Pennarun, G., Duriez, B., Escudier, E., Mitchison, H. M., Chodhari, R., Chung, E. M. K., Morgan, L. C., de Iongh, R. U., Rutland, J., Pradal, U., Omran, H., Amselem, S., Knowles, M. R.
(2006). Mutations of DNAI1 in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Evidence of Founder Effect in a Common Mutation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
174: 858-866
[Abstract][Full Text]
Siemering, K., Manji, S. S.M., Hutchison, W. M., Du Sart, D., Phelan, D., Dahl, H.-H. M.
(2006). Detection of Mutations in Genes Associated with Hearing Loss Using a Microarray-Based Approach. J. Mol. Diagn.
8: 483-489
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bicego, M., Beltramello, M., Melchionda, S., Carella, M., Piazza, V., Zelante, L., Bukauskas, F. F., Arslan, E., Cama, E., Pantano, S., Bruzzone, R., D'Andrea, P., Mammano, F.
(2006). Pathogenetic role of the deafness-related M34T mutation of Cx26. Hum Mol Genet
15: 2569-2587
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gardner, P., Oitmaa, E., Messner, A., Hoefsloot, L., Metspalu, A., Schrijver, I.
(2006). Simultaneous Multigene Mutation Detection in Patients With Sensorineural Hearing Loss Through a Novel Diagnostic Microarray: A New Approach for Newborn Screening Follow-up. Pediatrics
118: 985-994
[Abstract][Full Text]
Taitelbaum-Swead, R., Brownstein, Z., Muchnik, C., Kishon-Rabin, L., Kronenberg, J., Megirov, L., Frydman, M., Hildesheimer, M., Avraham, K. B.
(2006). Connexin-associated deafness and speech perception outcome of cochlear implantation.. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
132: 495-500
[Abstract][Full Text]
Eiberg, H, Hansen, L, Kjer, B, Hansen, T, Pedersen, O, Bille, M, Rosenberg, T, Tranebjaerg, L
(2006). Autosomal dominant optic atrophy associated with hearing impairment and impaired glucose regulation caused by a missense mutation in the WFS1 gene.. J. Med. Genet.
43: 435-440
[Abstract][Full Text]
del Castillo, F J, Rodriguez-Ballesteros, M, Alvarez, A, Hutchin, T, Leonardi, E, de Oliveira, C A, Azaiez, H, Brownstein, Z, Avenarius, M R, Marlin, S, Pandya, A, Shahin, H, Siemering, K R, Weil, D, Wuyts, W, Aguirre, L A, Martin, Y, Moreno-Pelayo, M A, Villamar, M, Avraham, K B, Dahl, H-H M, Kanaan, M, Nance, W E, Petit, C, Smith, R J H, Van Camp, G, Sartorato, E L, Murgia, A, Moreno, F, del Castillo, I
(2005). A novel deletion involving the connexin-30 gene, del(GJB6-d13s1854), found in trans with mutations in the GJB2 gene (connexin-26) in subjects with DFNB1 non-syndromic hearing impairment. J. Med. Genet.
42: 588-594
[Full Text]
Marlin, S., Feldmann, D., Blons, H., Loundon, N., Rouillon, I., Albert, S., Chauvin, P., Garabedian, E.-N., Couderc, R., Odent, S., Joannard, A., Schmerber, S., Delobel, B., Leman, J., Journel, H., Catros, H., Lemarechal, C., Dollfus, H., Eliot, M.-M., Delaunoy, J.-L., David, A., Calais, C., Drouin-Garraud, V., Obstoy, M.-F., Goizet, C., Duriez, F., Fellmann, F., Helias, J., Vigneron, J., Montaut, B., Matin-Coignard, D., Faivre, L., Baumann, C., Lewin, P., Petit, C., Denoyelle, F.
(2005). GJB2 and GJB6 Mutations: Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlations in a Large Cohort of Hearing-Impaired Patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
131: 481-487
[Abstract][Full Text]
Leonard, N J, Krol, A L, Bleoo, S, Somerville, M J
(2005). Sensorineural hearing loss, striate palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, and knuckle pads in a patient with a novel connexin 26 (GJB2) mutation. J. Med. Genet.
42: e2-e2
[Full Text]
Schrijver, I.
(2004). Hereditary Non-Syndromic Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Transforming Silence to Sound. J. Mol. Diagn.
6: 275-284
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lustig, L. R., Lin, D., Venick, H., Larky, J., Yeagle, J., Chinnici, J., Polite, C., Mhatre, A. N., Niparko, J. K., Lalwani, A. K.
(2004). GJB2 Gene Mutations in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Prevalence and Impact on Outcome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
130: 541-546
[Abstract][Full Text]
Modamio-Hoybjor, S, Moreno-Pelayo, M A, Mencia, A, del Castillo, I, Chardenoux, S, Morais, D, Lathrop, M, Petit, C, Moreno, F
(2004). A novel locus for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss, DFNA50, maps to chromosome 7q32 between the DFNB17 and DFNB13 deafness loci. J. Med. Genet.
41: e14-14
[Full Text]
Moreno-Pelayo, M A, Modamio-Hoybjor, S, Mencia, A, del Castillo, I, Chardenoux, S, Fernandez-Burriel, M, Lathrop, M, Petit, C, Moreno, F
(2003). DFNA49, a novel locus for autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss, maps proximal to DFNA7/DFNM1 region on chromosome 1q21-q23. J. Med. Genet.
40: 832-836
[Full Text]
Michel, V., Hardelin, J.-P., Petit, C.
(2003). Molecular Mechanism of a Frequent Genetic Form of Deafness. NEJM
349: 716-717
[Full Text]
Alvarez, A, del Castillo, I, Pera, A, Villamar, M, Moreno-Pelayo, M A, Rivera, T, Solanellas, J, Moreno, F
(2003). Uniparental disomy of chromosome 13q causing homozygosity for the 35delG mutation in the gene encoding connexin26 (GJB2) results in prelingual hearing impairment in two unrelated Spanish patients. J. Med. Genet.
40: 636-639
[Full Text]
Bakirtzis, G., Choudhry, R., Aasen, T., Shore, L., Brown, K., Bryson, S., Forrow, S., Tetley, L., Finbow, M., Greenhalgh, D., Hodgins, M.
(2003). Targeted epidermal expression of mutant Connexin 26(D66H) mimics true Vohwinkel syndrome and provides a model for the pathogenesis of dominant connexin disorders. Hum Mol Genet
12: 1737-1744
[Abstract][Full Text]
RamShankar, M, Girirajan, S, Dagan, O, Ravi Shankar, H M, Jalvi, R, Rangasayee, R, Avraham, K B, Anand, A
(2003). Contribution of connexin26 (GJB2) mutations and founder effect to non-syndromic hearing loss in India. J. Med. Genet.
40: e68-68
[Full Text]
Slavotinek, A., Biesecker, L. G.
(2003). Genetic modifiers in human development and malformation syndromes, including chaperone proteins. Hum Mol Genet
12: R45-50
[Abstract][Full Text]
Teubner, B., Michel, V., Pesch, J., Lautermann, J., Cohen-Salmon, M., Sohl, G., Jahnke, K., Winterhager, E., Herberhold, C., Hardelin, J.-P., Petit, C., Willecke, K.
(2003). Connexin30 (Gjb6)-deficiency causes severe hearing impairment and lack of endocochlear potential. Hum Mol Genet
12: 13-21
[Abstract][Full Text]
Morton, C. C.
(2002). Genetics, genomics and gene discovery in the auditory system. Hum Mol Genet
11: 1229-1240
[Abstract][Full Text]