The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2002;346(11):872.

Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 346:404-412 February 7, 2002 Number 6
NextNext

Benefit of Atrial Pacing in Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Stephane Garrigue, M.D., Philippe Bordier, M.D., Pierre Jaïs, M.D., Dipen C. Shah, M.D., Meleze Hocini, M.D., Chantal Raherison, M.D., Manuel Tunon De Lara, M.D., Michel Haïssaguerre, M.D., and Jacques Clementy, M.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Drazen, J. M.
-Editorial
 by Gottlieb, D. J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Many patients with sleep apnea syndrome have nocturnal bradycardia, paroxysmal tachyarrhythmias, or both, which can be prevented by permanent atrial pacing. We evaluated the effect of using cardiac pacing to increase the heart rate during sleep in patients with sleep apnea syndrome.

Methods We studied 15 patients (11 men and 4 women; mean [±SD] age, 69±9 years) with central or obstructive sleep apnea who had received permanent atrial-synchronous ventricular pacemakers for symptomatic sinus bradycardia. All patients underwent three polysomnographic evaluations on consecutive nights, the first night for base-line evaluation and then, in random order, one night in spontaneous rhythm and one in dual-chamber pacing mode with atrial overdrive (basic rate, 15 beats per minute faster than the mean nocturnal sinus rate). The total duration and number of episodes of central or obstructive sleep apnea or hypopnea were analyzed and compared.

Results The mean 24-hour sinus rate during spontaneous rhythm was 57±5 beats per minute at base line, as compared with 72±3 beats per minute with atrial overdrive pacing (P<0.001). The total duration of sleep was 321±49 minutes in spontaneous rhythm, as compared with 331±46 minutes with atrial overdrive pacing (P=0.48). The hypopnea index (the total number of episodes of hypopnea divided by the number of hours of sleep) was reduced from 9±4 in spontaneous rhythm to 3±3 with atrial overdrive pacing (P<0.001). For both apnea and hypopnea, the value for the index was 28±22 in spontaneous rhythm, as compared with 11±14 with atrial overdrive pacing (P<0.001).

Conclusions In patients with sleep apnea syndrome, atrial overdrive pacing significantly reduces the number of episodes of central or obstructive sleep apnea without reducing the total sleep time.


Sleep apnea syndrome is a common and often undiagnosed disorder associated with substantial cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Other consequences include an increased incidence of traffic accidents,9,10,11 social and family disruption,9,10,12 and bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias.13,14,15 Treatments such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure16,17,18 and oral administration of theophylline19 reduce the number of episodes of apnea but produce side effects such as palpitations. Surgical therapy involving the ablation of tissue, such as uvulopalatopharyngoplasty,20,21 has also been proposed for patients with apnea that is predominantly obstructive.

We observed that some patients who had received a pacemaker with atrial overdrive pacing in order to reduce the incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias22,23 reported a reduction in breathing disorders after the implantation of the pacemaker. We therefore undertook a study to investigate the efficacy of atrial overdrive pacing in the treatment of sleep apnea syndrome in consecutive patients who required a pacemaker for conventional indications.

Methods

Study Population

A total of 152 patients with dual-chamber pacemakers that had been implanted at least one year previously were screened. A total of 47 patients with problems related to sleep-disordered breathing, snoring, daytime sleepiness, frequent arousals at night, sleep apnea, or some combination of these symptoms were asked to undergo polysomnography in a sleep laboratory. Of these 47 patients, 26 provided written informed consent, and in 15 of them, polysomnographic recordings revealed sleep apnea syndrome, as defined by an apnea index (the total number of episodes of apnea divided by the number of hours of sleep) of 5 or higher and an apnea–hypopnea index (the total number of episodes of either apnea or hypopnea divided by the number of hours of sleep) of 15 or higher.24,25,26 These 15 patients, who did not engage in regular physical exercise, presented with snoring, daytime sleepiness, fatigue during the morning, and frequent arousals at night; they became the study group. They had no clinical evidence of heart failure, perhaps because they were sedentary, but 11 patients (73 percent) had a left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography ranging from 40 to 56 percent within the six months before the study. None of the patients were dependent on the pacemaker.

Polysomnography

Polysomnography was performed in the sleep laboratory with monitoring that included electroencephalography, electromyography of the chin and legs, electro-oculography, oronasal air-flow tracing, recording of the movement of the chest wall and abdomen, finger oximetry, and electrocardiography with a Holter monitor.27 Air flow was monitored qualitatively with an oronasal thermocouple. An episode of apnea was defined as a complete cessation of air flow for at least 10 seconds.19,27 An episode of hypopnea was defined as a decrease of 50 percent or more in the oronasal air flow associated with a 4 percent decrease in arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation. An obstructive event was recorded if there were rib-cage excursions, abdominal excursions, or both during an episode of apnea. The simultaneous absence of air-flow thermistor tracing and respiratory movements was considered to indicate the presence of central apnea.19,27 The number of episodes of arousal due to disordered breathing per hour of sleep was referred to as the arousal index. All polysomnographic recordings were scored by a pneumologist who was unaware of the pacing configuration and not otherwise involved in the study.

Study Protocol

The 15 patients spent three consecutive nights in the sleep laboratory. Their medications were not changed during the study. All polysomnographic recordings were performed with use of the same procedures. The polysomnographic recording of the first night represents the base line (basic pacing rate, 55 to 60 beats per minute), which established the diagnosis of sleep apnea syndrome. The patients were randomly assigned to undergo one of two sets of procedures on the next night and the other set on the night after that. During one of the two nights, the basic ventricular rate of the pacemaker (not synchronized with the atrial activity) was programmed to 40 beats per minute with the aim of recording spontaneous rhythm for a high percentage of the sleep time in order to assess measures of breathing in the absence of pacing (the no-pacing phase). During the other night, atrial overdrive stimulation was provided at a rate that was 15 beats per minute faster than the mean nocturnal heart rate (recorded by the memory function of the pacemaker during the base-line nocturnal assessment) in order to assess the effect of pacing on breathing (the pacing phase). This level of pacing was chosen on the basis of its therapeutic effect on vagally induced atrial arrhythmias, as reported in recent studies.22,23

Statistical Analysis

Data obtained during the base-line recordings were compared with those obtained during the no-pacing and pacing phases. Values are reported as means ±SD. Because of the small sample size, the Mann–Whitney nonparametric test for paired data was used to compare intrapatient differences between the outcome variables during the no-pacing phase and the outcome variables during the pacing phase. In order to assess the effects of the order of the two phases of the study (assessment of period effects), the patients were divided into two groups — one with no pacing on night 2 and pacing on night 3 and the other with pacing on night 2 and no pacing on night 3. Period-effects analysis was performed by means of the Mann–Whitney nonparametric test for independent samples. This test consisted of comparing the two groups in terms of the mean differences in the data between the pacing phase and the no-pacing phase for each variable studied. A two-tailed P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Calculations were performed with the use of Statistica software (StatSoft, Tulsa, Okla.).

Results

Base-Line Polysomnographic Assessment

The base-line characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Nine patients had sinus node disease (60 percent), and six (40 percent) had bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome. Six patients were randomly assigned to receive no pacing on night 2 and nine to receive no pacing on night 3. The 24-hour mean spontaneous heart rate during the base-line phase was similar for all the patients (57±5 beats per minute). All patients presented with episodes of both obstructive and central apnea; the study group had a higher central-apnea index (12±14) than obstructive-apnea index (7±4), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.09) (Table 1). Seven patients (Patients 1 through 7) had apnea that was predominantly obstructive (central-apnea index, 5±4; obstructive-apnea index, 8±4). The other eight patients (Patients 8 through 15) had apnea that was predominantly central (central-apnea index, 18±16; obstructive-apnea index, 6±3) (Table 1). The left ventricular ejection fraction was 56 percent or lower in 11 patients (73 percent) and 65 percent or higher in 4 patients (27 percent). The percentage of total sleep time during which oxyhemoglobin saturation was below 90 percent was 12±8 percent, and the mean arousal index was 21±12.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Characteristics and Sleep-Disordered Breathing Events at Base Line in 15 Patients with a Pacemaker.

 
No-Pacing Phase

Data collected during the no-pacing phase and the pacing phase are shown in Table 2. Pacemaker stimulation was used during 1.0±0.5 percent of the no-pacing phase because five patients had short episodes of bradycardia with a heart rate of less than 40 beats per minute. The mean total sleep time during the no-pacing phase was 321±49 minutes, the mean apnea–hypopnea index was 28±22, and the mean arousal index was 18±9.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Sleep-Disordered Breathing Events and Arterial Oxygen Saturation Values during the No-Pacing Phase and the Pacing Phase.

 
Pacing Phase with Atrial Overdrive Pacing

Atrial pacing at a rate 15 beats per minute faster than the mean nocturnal heart rate resulted in a significant reduction in the number of episodes of all types of apnea (Table 2). In 13 patients (87 percent), the apnea–hypopnea index was reduced by more than 50 percent. The two remaining patients had smaller reductions in the apnea–hypopnea index: one patient had an index of 21 with no pacing and an index of 12 with pacing (a 43 percent reduction), and the index of the other patient was reduced from 79 to 47 (a 41 percent reduction).

An example of a polysomnographic recording during the no-pacing phase from a patient (Patient 9) who presented with sleep apnea that was predominantly central is shown in Figure 1A. The heart-rate recording shows large variations, with a heart rate below 50 beats per minute during episodes of apnea and an increased heart rate (up to 100 beats per minute) during arousals. In contrast, the recording in Figure 1B shows a substantial reduction in the number of episodes of central apnea and hypopnea associated with much less variation in the heart rate when the basic pacing rate was set at 72 beats per minute. An example of polysomnographic recordings from a patient (Patient 3) with a large number of episodes of obstructive apnea is shown in Figure 2A; the number of episodes was markedly reduced when the heart rate was stabilized at 75 beats per minute (Figure 2B).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Polysomnographic Recordings in a Patient with Predominantly Central Apnea Obtained with the Pacemaker Programmed to a Fixed Basic Rate of 40 Beats per Minute (No-Pacing Phase) (Panel A) and with Atrial Overdrive Pacing at 72 Beats per Minute (Pacing Phase) (Panel B).

Patient 9 presented with very frequent episodes of central sleep apnea. Each episode of apnea or hypopnea is represented by a vertical line; the height of the line indicates the duration of the episode in seconds.

 

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Polysomnographic Recordings in a Patient with Predominantly Obstructive Apnea Obtained with the Pacemaker Programmed to a Fixed Basic Rate of 40 Beats per Minute (No-Pacing Phase) (Panel A) and with Atrial Overdrive Pacing at 75 Beats per Minute (Pacing Phase) (Panel B).

At presentation, the majority of the episodes of sleep apnea in this patient (Patient 3) were obstructive. Each episode of apnea or hypopnea is represented by a vertical line; the height of the line indicates the duration of the episode in seconds.

 
The effect of atrial overdrive pacing on the obstructive-apnea index and the central-apnea index of each of the 15 patients is shown in Figure 3. Regardless of the severity of the sleep apnea syndrome, there was a reduction in both indexes in every patient. The reduction in the number of episodes of apnea and hypopnea was associated with a significant increase in the arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation during sleep, reflected by a reduction of the total sleep time during which the oxygen saturation was less than 90 percent (from 10±6 percent to 6±4 percent, P=0.04) (Table 2), in addition to a significant increase in the lowest oxygen saturation value from 83±8 percent to 87±5 percent (P=0.02). There was also a significant decrease in the number of arousals due to periodic breathing that were recorded on electroencephalography, but the typical Cheyne–Stokes pattern was found only in Patient 10 and was present at all three evaluations.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect in the 15 Patients of Atrial Overdrive Pacing on Episodes of Central Sleep Apnea (Panel A) and Episodes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (Panel B).

The central- and obstructive-apnea indexes were calculated as the number of episodes divided by the number of hours of sleep.

 
The statistical analysis revealed only two significant period effects (Table 2): there was a significantly greater reduction in the obstructive-apnea index among patients assigned to pacing on night 3 (P=0.04) and a significantly greater increase in the lowest oxyhemoglobin saturation value among patients assigned to pacing on night 2 (P=0.04).

Cardiac Rhythm

All the patients tolerated the protocol well: the total sleep time was similar at base line and during the pacing and no-pacing phases. The Holter monitor tracing and the recordings of the memory function of the pacemaker revealed a significant increase in the mean nocturnal heart rate during the atrial overdrive (pacing) phase (Table 2). The numbers of episodes of atrial arrhythmia that occurred during the pacing and no-pacing phases were similar. Three patients had an episode of atrial arrhythmia (one lasting 21 minutes, one lasting 35 minutes, and one lasting 6 minutes) during the no-pacing phase, and two patients had such an episode (one lasting 18 minutes and the other lasting 27 minutes) during the pacing phase. There were no differences in the number of isolated premature ventricular contractions per hour of sleep (13±24 at base line, 16±31 during the no-pacing phase, and 12±25 during the pacing phase). Neither ventricular couplets nor episodes of ventricular tachycardia were observed during the base-line assessment or during the pacing or no-pacing phase of the study.

Discussion

Our observations show that in patients with sleep apnea syndrome who have an atrial pacemaker, atrial overdrive pacing significantly reduces the number of episodes of obstructive and central sleep apnea and increases arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation without altering total sleep time. A reduction of more than 50 percent in the number of episodes of apnea and hypopnea was achieved with atrial overdrive pacing in most patients (13 of 15), irrespective of whether they had obstructive or central sleep apnea, and was associated with a reduction in the number of arousals and an increase in arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation. These variables returned to the base-line values defining sleep apnea syndrome when the pacemaker was turned off.

Episodes of apnea are associated with hypoxemia, the retention of carbon dioxide, bradycardia, and a decrease in blood pressure that is, in turn, associated with an increase in vagal tone leading to periodic variations in heart rate.24,25,26,27 Our data show that reducing the variations in heart rate markedly reduced the number of episodes of sleep apnea in our study population. These periodic variations in heart rate may result in part from changes in autonomic tone and may influence the incidence of central sleep apnea. Consequently, atrial pacing at a high rate relative to that of spontaneous sinus bradycardia may counteract sustained increases in vagal tone by maintaining sympathetic activity.

This hypothesis is compatible with the results of recent studies28,29,30 showing the efficacy of atrial overdrive pacing in the treatment of vasovagal syncope. In addition, clinical studies have demonstrated that atrial overdrive pacing can suppress vagally induced episodes of atrial fibrillation.22,23,31 The hypothesis is further supported by a previous study suggesting that the therapeutic effects of theophylline in patients with central sleep apnea may be mediated by adenosine antagonism.32 The beneficial effect of theophylline on sleep apnea syndrome might be at least partially explained by its ability to reduce vagal tone.

In contrast to the effect on central sleep apnea, the mechanism of the amelioration of obstructive sleep apnea by atrial overdrive pacing is not clear. Obstructive apnea is caused mainly by the presence of excessive soft tissue (i.e., the soft palate, the tonsils, and the base of the tongue) or by hypotonia of the pharyngeal muscles during sleep.33,34,35,36 We did not expect that atrial overdrive pacing would reduce the obstructive-apnea index, since this type of apnea results primarily from anatomical obstruction. The mechanisms involved remain to be explained.

We observed a reduction of more than 50 percent in the apnea–hypopnea index with atrial overdrive. Thus, in our population of patients with symptomatic bradycardia, cardiac pacing could be considered as an alternative to treatment with continuous positive airway pressure or oral theophylline.16,17,18,19,37 The ablation of tissue has been proposed as a surgical method for the treatment of snoring and obstructive apnea. Improvement has been achieved in 38 to 50 percent of the patients who have undergone such a surgical procedure.38,39,40,41

In our study, cardiac pacing was effective in patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmias and frequent variations in heart rate. Whether similar beneficial effects could be achieved with atrial pacing in patients who had no indications for pacemaker implantation (typically, sinus node disease or bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome) remains to be determined. In addition, all but four of our patients presented with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Therefore, our results cannot yet be extrapolated to patients with normal cardiac function who have sleep apnea syndrome, even though our four patients with normal cardiac function had more than a 50 percent reduction in the sleep-apnea index.

Atrial overdrive pacing substantially reduced the number of episodes of central and obstructive apnea in patients with pacemakers that had previously been implanted for the treatment of the sick sinus syndrome or the bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms involved in achieving these reductions and to assess the precise role of cardiac pacing in preventing symptoms, disability, and death in the general population of patients with sleep apnea syndrome.


Source Information

From the Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque (S.G., P.B., P.J., D.C.S., M. Hocini, M. Haïssaguerre, J.C.) and the Department of Lungs and Respiratory Disease, Hôpital du Haut-Lévêque (C.R., M.T.D.), University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Garrigue at the Cardiac Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Department, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, 19, ave. de Magellan, Pessac, CEDEX 33604, France, or at stgarrigue{at}aol.com.

References

  1. Mooe T, Rabben T, Wiklund U, Franklin KA, Eriksson P. Sleep-disordered breathing in men with coronary artery disease. Chest 1996;109:659-663. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Franklin KA, Nilsson JB, Sahlin C, Naslund U. Sleep apnoea and nocturnal angina. Lancet 1995;345:1085-1087. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Krieger J, Grucker D, Sforza E, Chambron J, Kurtz D. Left ventricular ejection fraction in obstructive sleep apnea: effects of long-term treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Chest 1991;100:917-921. [ISI][Medline]
  4. Partinen M, Jamieson A, Guilleminault C. Long-term outcome for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients: mortality. Chest 1988;94:1200-1204. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Roux F, D'Ambrosio C, Mohsenin V. Sleep-related breathing disorders and cardiovascular disease. Am J Med 2000;108:396-402. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Veale D, Chailleux E, Hoorelbeke-Ramon A, et al. Mortality of sleep apnoea patients treated by nasal continuous positive airway pressure registered in the ANTADIR observatory. Eur Respir J 2000;15:326-331. [Abstract]
  7. Newman AB, Spiekerman CF, Enright P, et al. Daytime sleepiness predicts mortality and cardiovascular disease in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:115-123. [ISI][Medline]
  8. Javaheri S. Central sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in heart failure: prevalence, impact, and treatment. Sleep 1996;19:Suppl:S229-S231. [ISI][Medline]
  9. Cassel W, Ploch T, Becker C, Dugnus D, Peter JH, von Wichert P. Risk of traffic accidents in patients with sleep-disordered breathing: reduction with nasal CPAP. Eur Respir J 1996;9:2606-2611. [Abstract]
  10. Yamamoto H, Akashiba T, Kosaka N, Ito D, Horie T. Long-term effects nasal continuous positive airway pressure on daytime sleepiness, mood and traffic accidents in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Respir Med 2000;94:87-90. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Terán-Santos J, Jiménez-Gómez A, Cordero-Guevara J, Cooperative Group Burgos-Santander. The association between sleep apnea and the risk of traffic accidents. N Engl J Med 1999;340:847-851. [Free Full Text]
  12. Findley L, Smith C, Hooper J, Dineen M, Suratt PM. Treatment with nasal CPAP decreases automobile accidents in patients with sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:857-859. [Free Full Text]
  13. Grimm W, Hoffmann J, Menz V, et al. Electrophysiologic evaluation of sinus node function and atrioventricular conduction in patients with prolonged ventricular asystole during obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:1310-1314. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. Stegman SS, Burroughs JM, Henthorn RW. Asymptomatic bradyarrhythmias as a marker for sleep apnea: appropriate recognition and treatment may reduce the need for pacemaker therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:899-904. [CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Becker HF, Koehler U, Stammnitz A, Peter JH. Heart block in patients with sleep apnoea. Thorax 1998;53:Suppl 3:S29-S32. [Free Full Text]
  16. Davies RJ, Harrington KJ, Ormerod OJ, Stradling JR. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure in chronic heart failure with sleep-disordered breathing. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:630-634. [ISI][Medline]
  17. Issa FG, Sullivan CE. Reversal of central sleep apnea using nasal CPAP. Chest 1986;90:165-171. [CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Sullivan CE, Issa FG, Berthon-Jones M, Eves L. Reversal of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares. Lancet 1981;1:862-865. [ISI][Medline]
  19. Javaheri S, Parker TJ, Wexler L, Liming JD, Lindower P, Roselle GA. Effect of theophylline on sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure. N Engl J Med 1996;335:562-567. [Free Full Text]
  20. Fujita S, Conway W, Zorick F, Roth T. Surgical correction of anatomic abnormalities in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981;89:923-934. [ISI][Medline]
  21. Woodson BT, Wooten MR. Manometric and endoscopic localization of airway obstruction after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111:38-43. [Medline]
  22. Garrigue S, Barold SS, Cazeau S, et al. Is there a synergic effect of propafenone associated with atrial overdrive pacing for atrial arrhythmia prevention? A randomised crossover study. Heart 2000;83:172-177. [Free Full Text]
  23. Garrigue S, Barold SS, Cazeau S, et al. Prevention of atrial arrhythmias during DDD pacing by atrial overdrive. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1751-1759. [CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Guilleminault C, Tilkian AG, Dement WC. The sleep apnea syndromes. Annu Rev Med 1976;27:465-484. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  25. Coccagna G, Mantovani M, Brignani F, Parchi C, Lugaresi E. Continuous recording of the pulmonary and systemic arterial pressure during sleep in syndromes of hypersomnia with periodic breathing. Bull Physiopathol Respir (Nancy) 1972;8:1159-1172. 
  26. Guilleminault C, Connolly S, Winkle R, Melvin K, Tilkian A. Cyclical variation of the heart rate in sleep apnoea syndrome: mechanisms, and usefulness of 24 h electrocardiography as a screening technique. Lancet 1984;1:126-131. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Narkiewicz K, Montano N, Cogliati C, van de Borne PJ, Dyken ME, Somers VK. Altered cardiovascular variability in obstructive sleep apnea. Circulation 1998;98:1071-1077. [Free Full Text]
  28. Deharo JC, Peyre JP, Ritter PH, Chalvidan T, Le Tallec L, Djiane P. Treatment of malignant primary vasodepressive neurocardiogenic syncope with a rate responsive pacemaker driven by heart contractility. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:2688-2690. [CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Abe H, Iwami Y, Nagatomo T, Miura Y, Nakashima Y. Treatment of malignant neurocardiogenic vasovagal syncope with a rate drop algorithm in dual chamber cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1473-1475. [Medline]
  30. Sheldon R. Role of pacing in the treatment of vasovagal syncope. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:Suppl:26Q-32Q. [Medline]
  31. Coumel P, Friocourt P, Mugica J, Attuel P, Leclercq JF. Long-term prevention of vagal atrial arrhythmias by atrial pacing at 90/minute: experience with 6 cases. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1983;6:552-560. [CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Sin DD, Man GC, Jones RL. Central sleep apnea and heart failure. N Engl J Med 2000;342:293-293. [Free Full Text]
  33. Hudgel DW. Variable site of airway narrowing among obstructive sleep apnea patients. J Appl Physiol 1986;61:1403-1409. [Free Full Text]
  34. Hillarp B, Nylander G, Rosen I, Wickstrom O. Videoradiography of patients with habitual snoring and/or sleep apnea: technical description and presentation of videoradiographic results during sleep concerning occurrence of apnea, type of apnea and site of obstruction. Acta Radiol 1996;37:307-314. [ISI][Medline]
  35. Kuna ST. Respiratory-related activation and mechanical effects of the pharyngeal constrictor muscles. Respir Physiol 2000;119:155-161. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  36. Isono S, Tanaka A, Nishino T. Effects of tongue electrical stimulation on pharyngeal mechanics in anaesthetized patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J 1999;14:1258-1265. [Abstract]
  37. Javaheri S. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on sleep apnea and ventricular irritability in patients with heart failure. Circulation 2000;101:392-397. [Free Full Text]
  38. Finkelstein Y, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Stein G, Ophir D. Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty vs laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:265-276. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  39. Sher AE, Schechtman KB, Piccirillo JF. The efficacy of surgical modifications of the upper airway in adults with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep 1996;19:156-177. [ISI][Medline]
  40. Langin T, Pepin JL, Pendlebury S, et al. Upper airway changes in snorers and mild sleep apnea sufferers after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP). Chest 1998;113:1595-1603. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  41. Powell NB, Riley RW, Troell RJ, Li K, Blumen MB, Guilleminault C. Radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction of the palate in subjects with sleep-disordered breathing. Chest 1998;113:1163-1174. [Medline]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Drazen, J. M.
-Editorial
 by Gottlieb, D. J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

Atrial Pacing in Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Wellman A., Malhotra A., White D. P., Schotland H. M., Stein P., Duntley S., Garrigue S., Bordier P., Haïssaguerre M.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2002; 347:445-446, Aug 8, 2002. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.