Voriconazole versus Amphotericin B for Primary Therapy of Invasive Aspergillosis
Raoul Herbrecht, M.D., David W. Denning, F.R.C.P., Thomas F. Patterson, M.D., John E. Bennett, M.D., Reginald E. Greene, M.D., Jörg-W. Oestmann, M.D., Winfried V. Kern, M.D., Kieren A. Marr, M.D., Patricia Ribaud, M.D., Olivier Lortholary, M.D., Ph.D., Richard Sylvester, Sc.D., Robert H. Rubin, M.D., John R. Wingard, M.D., Paul Stark, M.D., Christine Durand, M.D., Denis Caillot, M.D., Eckhard Thiel, M.D., Pranatharthi H. Chandrasekar, M.D., Michael R. Hodges, M.D., Haran T. Schlamm, M.D., Peter F. Troke, Ph.D., Ben de Pauw, M.D., for the Invasive Fungal Infections Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Global Aspergillus Study Group
Methods In this randomized, unblinded trial, patients receivedeither intravenous voriconazole (two doses of 6 mg per kilogramof body weight on day 1, then 4 mg per kilogram twice dailyfor at least seven days) followed by 200 mg orally twice dailyor intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 to 1.5 mg perkilogram per day). Other licensed antifungal treatments wereallowed if the initial therapy failed or if the patient hadan intolerance to the first drug used. A complete or partialresponse was considered to be a successful outcome.
Invasive aspergillosis is a major infectious complication inpatients with prolonged neutropenia and in transplant recipients.Its incidence ranges from 5 percent to more than 20 percentin high-risk groups.1 For decades, amphotericin B deoxycholatehas been the standard therapy for invasive aspergillosis, althoughresponses are suboptimal (less than 40 percent) in severelyimmunosuppressed patients.1,2,3Amphotericin B is associatedwith multiple side effects, which may be ameliorated with theuse of lipid formulations.4,5,6
Voriconazole is a new broad-spectrum triazole that is activein vitro against various yeasts and molds, including aspergillusspecies.7 A noncomparative study demonstrated a response rateof 48 percent among patients with acute invasive aspergillosis.8We undertook an open, randomized trial comparing the efficacy,safety, and tolerability of voriconazole with those of amphotericinB for the primary therapy of acute invasive aspergillosis inimmunocompromised patients; both types of therapy were followedby other licensed antifungal therapy when toxic effects or insufficientresponse dictated.
Methods
Conduct of the Study
Two identical protocols (protocol 150-307 in Europe, Israel,and Australia and protocol 150-602 in the United States, Canada,Mexico, Brazil, and India) were designed under the aegis ofan international steering committee that included the InvasiveFungal Infections Group of the European Organisation for Researchand Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). The protocols were approvedby the appropriate institutional review boards, and writteninformed consent was obtained from all patients or their parentsor guardians. The studies were assessed by an independent datareview committee consisting of eight clinicians and four radiologistsand were monitored by two data and safety monitoring boards.Statistical analysis was conducted by the EORTC Data Center.The study's sponsor, Pfizer, allowed the investigators independencein study design and analysis. The data were held at the EORTCData Center in Brussels, Belgium, and at Pfizer.
Definite invasive aspergillosis was defined as a clinicallycompatible illness plus one or more of the following: isolationof aspergillus species from a normally sterile site; hyphaeconsistent with the presence of aspergillus in a biopsy specimenor aspirate, plus culture of aspergillus from the same organ;radiologic evidence of pulmonary lesions that were not attributableto other factors and a culture of bronchoalveolar-lavage fluidthat was positive for aspergillus in a patient who had undergoneallogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation or who had a neutropenichematologic condition; or tracheobronchial lesions confirmedby bronchoscopy, with a positive culture for aspergillus. Neutropeniawas defined by a neutrophil count of less than 500 per cubicmillimeter at some point during the previous two weeks.
Probable invasive aspergillosis was defined as a clinicallycompatible illness plus one or more of the following: hyphaeconsistent with the presence of aspergillus in a biopsy specimenor aspirate but without culture; the presence of a halo or anair-crescent sign on a computed tomographic (CT) scan of thelung9 in a patient who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic-celltransplantation or who had a neutropenic hematologic condition;radiologic evidence of new pulmonary lesions that were not attributableto other factors in a patient who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic-celltransplantation or who had a neutropenic hematologic conditionwith either hyphae consistent with the presence of aspergillusin bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid or sputum or a sputum culturethat was positive for aspergillus; clinical evidence of sinusitis,opacification of a sinus on CT or magnetic resonance imaging,and positive histopathological examination or culture of aspergillusfrom a lesion in the nose or paranasal sinus in a patient whohad undergone allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantationor who had a neutropenic hematologic condition; radiologic evidenceof new pulmonary lesions that were not attributable to otherfactors and bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid that was positive foraspergillus on a smear or culture in a patient with anotherimmunocompromising condition (other than lung transplantation);or tracheobronchial lesions confirmed by bronchoscopy and apositive finding on histopathological or microscopic examinationof a biopsy specimen or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
Patients were ineligible if they had chronic aspergillosis,aspergilloma, or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis orhad received systemic therapy for more than 96 hours with morethan 0.5 mg of amphotericin B per kilogram of body weight perday (including lipid derivatives) or more than 200 mg of itraconazoleper day during the preceding 14 days. Patients were also ineligibleif they had received or were receiving interacting drugs (e.g.,rifampin), were hypersensitive to azoles or amphotericin B,or had an aminotransferase, bilirubin, or alkaline phosphataselevel higher than five times the upper limit of normal or aserum creatinine level higher than 2.5 mg per deciliter (221µmol per liter). Patients who were receiving artificialventilation, who had a life expectancy of less than 72 hours,or who were pregnant or lactating were also ineligible.
Study Design
With the use of central randomization according to the minimizationtechnique,10 patients were assigned to treatment groups, withstratification according to the center, the site of infection(pulmonary or other), the underlying condition (allogeneic hematopoietic-celltransplantation, hematologic condition, or other immunocompromisingcondition), and the base-line neutropenic status (neutropenicor nonneutropenic). Patients received primary therapy with eithervoriconazole (6 mg per kilogram intravenously twice a day onday 1, followed by 4 mg per kilogram intravenously twice dailyfor at least seven days, after which time patients could switchto oral voriconazole, 200 mg twice daily) or intravenous amphotericinB deoxycholate (1.0 to 1.5 mg per kilogram once daily). Patientswith an intolerance or no response to the initial therapy couldbe switched to other licensed antifungal therapy and continueto be included in the analyses. The planned duration of therapywas 12 weeks. Administration of study drugs was discontinuedin cases of severe adverse events, an increase in the serumcreatinine level to double the base-line value or more than3.0 mg per deciliter (265 µmol per liter) if the base-linevalue was higher than 1.5 mg per deciliter (133 µmol perliter), or an increase in aminotransferase levels to more than5 times the upper limit of normal or 10 times the upper limitof normal if the base-line value was more than 2 times the upperlimit of normal.
The data-review committee, which was blinded to the study-drugassignment and to adverse events and laboratory abnormalitieswhose presence would suggest the use of a particular study drug,assessed the certainty of the diagnosis at study entry and theresponse to treatment on the basis of predefined criteria. Thecommittee assessed the global response at week 12 and at theend of the initial period of randomized therapy.
Digitized radiologic images were reviewed by the radiologistson the data-review committee. Lesions were evaluated visuallyfor changes with the use of computerized planimetry for assistancein estimating the percentage change. Complete responses weredefined by the resolution of all clinical signs and symptomsand more than 90 percent of the lesions due to invasive aspergillosisthat were visible on radiology. Partial responses were definedby clinical improvement and greater than 50 percent improvementin findings on radiology. Stable responses were defined by theabsence of change from base line or an improvement of less than50 percent. Failure of therapy was defined by worsening disease.Complete and partial responses were classified as successfuloutcomes. Stable and indeterminate responses and failures oftherapy were regarded as unsuccessful outcomes.
Statistical Analysis
Before the two studies began, we planned to combine the resultsof both in a predefined analysis. The intention-to-treat populationconsisted of all patients who underwent randomization. The modifiedintention-to-treat population consisted of those who receivedat least one dose of the medication they were initially assignedto receive and who had a base-line diagnosis of definite orprobable invasive aspergillosis as confirmed by the data-reviewcommittee. The population included in the safety analysis consistedof all patients who received their initial study medication.
The primary objective of the studies was to demonstrate thenoninferiority of voriconazole as compared with amphotericinB at week 12 in the modified intention-to-treat population.We estimated that the rate of successful outcomes with amphotericinB at week 12 would be 50 percent. Voriconazole would be considerednot to be inferior to amphotericin B if the lower limit of thetwo-sided 95 percent confidence interval for the differencein voriconazole response rate minus the difference in amphotericinB response rate was above 20 percentage points.
One secondary objective was the demonstration of the superiorityof the response to voriconazole at the end of the initial therapyin the modified intention-to-treat population as indicatedby a two-sided 95 percent confidence interval entirely abovezero for the difference between the proportion with a completeor partial response in the voriconazole group and the proportionin the amphotericin B group. Other secondary objectives wereto compare the safety of the two drugs and the duration of survivalin the two groups up to week 12.
A sample size of 276 was required to assess the primary endpoint with at least 90 percent power. We compared the responsesby calculating the estimated difference between the responserates, with stratification according to study protocol (150-307or 150-602), and the corresponding approximate two-sided 95percent confidence interval. The hazard ratio for death wasestimated by the Cox proportional-hazards model, with stratificationaccording to study. The numbers of adverse events were comparedby Fisher's exact test. The mean numbers of adverse events werecompared by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All tests were two-sided.
Results
Enrollment and Base-Line Characteristics of the Patients
Between July 1997 and October 2000, a total of 391 patientsrecruited by 95 centers in 19 countries underwent randomizationin the studies: 252 patients were recruited in the 150-307 protocoland 139 in the 150-602 protocol.
A total of 197 patients were assigned to the voriconazole group,and 194 patients were assigned to the amphotericin B group;these patients comprised the intention-to-treat population.Twelve patients (three in the voriconazole group and nine inthe amphotericin B group) did not receive any treatment andwere excluded from the safety analyses. A total of 102 patients(50 in the voriconazole group and 52 in the amphotericin B group)were excluded from the modified intention-to-treat populationbecause they did not have a confirmed diagnosis of invasiveaspergillosis at base line. The most common reason for the lackof confirmation was the inability of the data-review committeeto confirm the presence of a halo or air-crescent sign at baseline in patients with no supporting mycologic or pathologicalevidence (35 in the voriconazole group and 25 in the amphotericinB group). Other reasons included inadequate mycologic evidence(in 10 patients in the voriconazole group and 15 in the amphotericinB group), no radiologic evidence of pulmonary or sinus infection(in 1 patient in the voriconazole group and 4 in the amphotericinB group), and absence of documentation of neutropenia or immunocompromisedcondition before base line (in 4 patients in the voriconazolegroup and 8 in the amphotericin B group).
The demographic characteristics and underlying conditions ofthe patients in the modified intention-to-treat population aresummarized in Table 1. The two groups were well matched, andthere was no significant difference in these characteristicsbetween the intention-to-treat population and the modified intention-to-treatpopulation. Patients enrolled according to the 150-602 protocolwere more likely than those enrolled according to the 150-307protocol to have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation(41 of 107 [38.3 percent] vs. 26 of 170 [15.3 percent], P<0.001),to have graft-versus-host disease (31 of 107 [29.0 percent]vs. 16 of 170 [9.4 percent], P<0.001), and to have receiveda definite diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (51 of 107 [47.7percent] vs. 57 of 170 [33.5 percent], P=0.02), and they wereless likely to have neutropenia (28 of 107 [26.2 percent] vs.95 of 170 [55.9 percent], P<0.001).
Table 1. Characteristics of the Patients in the Modified Intention-to-Treat Population.
Base-Line Characteristics of the Infection
Characteristics of the patients in terms of the site of theinfection, the level of certainty of the diagnosis, and theevidence supporting the diagnosis are summarized in Table 2.The only significant difference between groups was that thevoriconazole group had a higher proportion of definite casesof invasive aspergillosis (P=0.01). In the 110 infections inwhich the species was identified at base line, the species wasAspergillus fumigatus (in 85 patients), A. niger (in 9 patients),A. flavus (in 7 patients), A. terreus (in 6 patients), A. glaucus(in 1 patient), A. nidulans (in 1 patient), and A. sydowii (in1 patient).
Table 2. Site of the Infection, Degree of Certainty, and Evidence Supporting Base-Line Diagnosis in the Modified Intention-to-Treat Population.
Course of Therapy in the Modified Intention-to-Treat Population
The median duration of voriconazole treatment was 77 days (range,2 to 84), of which intravenous therapy accounted for a medianof 10 days (range, 2 to 78). The mean daily doses were 7.87mg per kilogram (range, 4.48 to 10.87) during the intravenousphase and 416 mg (range, 200 to 750) during the oral phase.Other licensed antifungal therapy was given to 52 patients inthe voriconazole group. The first other licensed antifungaltherapy was amphotericin B deoxycholate in 20 patients, a lipidformulation of amphotericin B in 14, itraconazole in 17, anda combination in 1.
The median duration of amphotericin B treatment was 10 days(range, 1 to 84), and the mean daily dose was 0.97 mg per kilogram(range, 0.27 to 1.50). During the first 14 days of therapy,administration of amphotericin B was suspended for more than1 day in 13 patients. Other licensed antifungal therapy wasgiven to 107 patients in the amphotericin B group. The firstother licensed antifungal therapy was a lipid formulation ofamphotericin B in 47 patients, itraconazole in 38, and anotherantifungal drug or a combination of drugs in 22.
Response
The outcome at week 12 in the modified intention-to-treat populationwas significantly better in patients receiving voriconazole,with a successful outcome in 76 of 144 patients (52.8 percent),as compared with 42 of 133 patients (31.6 percent) in the amphotericinB group (Table 3). The absolute difference was 21.2 percent,with a 95 percent confidence interval for the difference betweengroups stratified according to the study protocol of 10.4 to32.9 percentage points. Since the lower 95 percent confidencelimit for the difference between voriconazole and amphotericinB was above zero, voriconazole was considered not only not tobe inferior to amphotericin B, but also to be superior to it.
Table 3. Response Rate at Week 12 in the Modified Intention-to-Treat Population.
Retrospective stratification according to the level of certaintyof the diagnosis, the site of infection, the underlying condition,or the neutropenic status did not change the overall conclusions.Responses in patients receiving voriconazole appeared to besuperior at week 12 in all the various subgroups (Figure 1).Of 95 patients included with a diagnosis of probable aspergillosisthat was based on the presence of a halo sign without microbiologicconfirmation, 31 in the voriconazole group (67.4 percent) hada successful outcome, as compared with 21 (42.9 percent) inthe amphotericin B group. The difference (24.5 percentage pointsin favor of voriconazole) was almost identical to that amongall patients with probable aspergillosis 22.7 percentagepoints in favor of voriconazole.
Figure 1. Response Rates in the Modified Intention-to-Treat Population, According to the Study Protocol, Site of Infection, Underlying Condition, Neutropenic Status, and Degree of Certainty of the Diagnosis, and in the Intention-to-Treat Population.
Results are expressed as the differences (with 95 percent confidence intervals) between the voriconazole group and the amphotericin B group in the rate of successful outcomes.
In the intention-to-treat population, a successful outcome atweek 12 was observed in 49.7 percent of the patients in thevoriconazole group and 27.8 percent of those in the amphotericinB group (absolute difference, 21.9 percent; 95 percent confidenceinterval, 12.4 to 31.2).
At the end of the initial period of randomized therapy, 53.5percent of the patients in the modified intention-to-treat populationwho were receiving voriconazole had a satisfactory response,as compared with 21.8 percent of the patients treated with amphotericinB (absolute difference, 31.7 percent; 95 percent confidenceinterval, 21.1 to 42.6). There were similar results in the intention-to-treatpopulation.
Survival
At week 12, the survival rate was 70.8 percent in the patientsin the modified intention-to-treat population who were treatedwith voriconazole, as compared with 57.9 percent in the amphotericinB group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95 percent confidence interval,0.40 to 0.88) (Figure 2). Similar results were observed in theintention-to-treat population.
Figure 2. Survival Curves for the Modified Intention-to-Treat Population According to Treatment Group.
The P value was calculated by the log-rank test.
Safety
Significantly fewer adverse events that were regarded by theinvestigators as potentially related to treatment were observedduring voriconazole therapy (343 events) than during amphotericinB therapy (421 events, P=0.02), even though the median durationof therapy was much longer in the voriconazole group. Visualdisturbances were more common in patients receiving voriconazole,occurring in 87 patients (44.8 percent), as compared with 8patients in the amphotericin B group (4.3 percent, P<0.001).The most frequent descriptions of such disturbances were blurredvision, altered visual perception, altered color perception,and photophobia. All visual events were transient and resolvedwithout intervention. Thirteen patients receiving voriconazolehad hallucinations or confusion that was considered to be possiblyrelated to the study drug, as compared with five patients inthe amphotericin B group (P=0.09). There was no evidence ofa relation between the episodes of hallucination or confusionand visual disturbance (P=0.20). Chills, fever, or both thatwere potentially related to the study drugs were recorded insix patients receiving voriconazole (3.1 percent), as comparedwith 46 patients receiving amphotericin B therapy (24.9 percent,P<0.001). Skin reactions (rash, pruritus, or photosensitivity)were observed in 16 patients in the voriconazole group (8.2percent) and in 6 in the amphotericin B group (3.2 percent,P=0.05).
Table 4. Severe Adverse Events Potentially Related to Initial Randomized Therapy.
Discussion
We conducted a large randomized, comparative study of the efficacyof two different drugs in the primary treatment of invasiveaspergillosis. Previous studies either compared two doses ofliposomal amphotericin B or used historical controls.11,12 Definitionsused in this study were determined by a consensus of internationalinvestigators and proved sufficiently clear for a blinded data-reviewcommittee to use for confirmation. The largest discrepancy betweenthe diagnoses of investigators and the determinations of thedata-review committee resulted not from misinterpretation ofthe diagnostic criteria but from the lack of confirmation bythe radiologists on the data-review committee of the presenceof a halo or air-crescent sign on a CT scan of the lungs in60 cases.
The superiority of voriconazole in our study was not the resultof excessive interruptions of therapy or insufficient dosesin patients receiving amphotericin B. The duration of treatmentis unlikely to be the only factor contributing to the betteroverall results with voriconazole. Acute invasive aspergillosisis a rapidly progressive infection, and its outcome is determinedearly in the course of therapy. In the highly immunosuppressedpatients enrolled in this study, initial therapy with voriconazoleproved superior to initial therapy with conventional amphotericinB. The presence of more definite cases of aspergillosis amongpatients in the voriconazole group did not bias the results,because the superiority of voriconazole was similar in bothdefinite and probable cases. The difference in the rate of successfuloutcomes between the 150-602 and 150-307 studies can be explainedby the fact that the group involved in the former study includedmore patients who either had a diagnosis of definite aspergillosisor had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation.
The efficacy of voriconazole in invasive aspergillosis shownin this trial is consistent with the results of the recentlypublished comparison of voriconazole with liposomal amphotericinB for empirical antifungal therapy in persistently febrile patientswith neutropenia.13 In that study, a secondary analysis foundthat among the 415 patients who received voriconazole, only8 (1.9 percent) had breakthrough mycosis (4 of the cases involvingaspergillus species), as compared with 21 (5.0 percent, 13 ofthe cases involving aspergillus species) among the 422 patientswho received liposomal amphotericin B.
Voriconazole was better tolerated than amphotericin B, withfewer drug-related adverse events, severe adverse events, anddiscontinuations of therapy due to adverse events. Infusion-relatedadverse events and nephrotoxic effects are common in patientsreceiving amphotericin B but were not observed in patients receivingvoriconazole.
Presented in part at the 41st International Conference on AntimicrobialAgents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, December 1619, 2001.
Drs. Herbrecht, Patterson, Bennett, Marr, de Pauw, Rubin, andWingard have served as consultants for Pfizer. Drs. Hodges,Schlamm, and Troke are employees of Pfizer.
* Other members of the study are listed in the Appendix.
Source Information
From the Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France (R.H.); the University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.W.D.); the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio (T.F.P.); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md. (J.E.B.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (R.E.G.); Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany (J.-W.O.); Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Freiburg, Germany (W.V.K.); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (K.A.M.); Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris (P.R.); Institut Pasteur, Paris (O.L.); the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium (R.S.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (R.H.R.); the University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville (J.R.W.); the University of California at San Diego, San Diego (P.S.); Hôpital du Bocage, Dijon, France (C.D., D.C.); University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany (E.T.); Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit (P.H.C.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, New York (M.R.H., H.T.S.) and Sandwich, United Kingdom (P.F.T.); and University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (B.P.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Herbrecht at the Département d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Ave. Molière, 67098 Strasbourg CEDEX, France, or at raoul.herbrecht{at}chru-strasbourg.fr.
Stevens DA, Kan VL, Judson MA, et al. Practice guidelines for diseases caused by Aspergillus. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:696-709. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Patterson TF, Kirkpatrick WR, White M, et al. Invasive aspergillosis: disease spectrum, treatment practices, and outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore) 2000;79:250-260. [CrossRef][Medline]
Wingard JR, Kubilis P, Lee L, et al. Clinical significance of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with amphotericin B for suspected or proven aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:1402-1407. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bates DW, Su L, Yu DT, et al. Mortality and costs of acute renal failure associated with amphotericin B therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:686-693. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tiphine M, Letscher-Bru V, Herbrecht R. Amphotericin B and its new formulations: pharmacologic characteristics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability. Transpl Infect Dis 1999;1:273-283. [CrossRef][Medline]
Espinel-Ingroff A. In vitro fungicidal activities of voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against opportunistic moniliaceous and dematiaceous fungi. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:954-958. [Free Full Text]
Denning DW, Ribaud P, Milpied N, et al. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:563-571. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Siegelman SS. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in acute leukemia: characteristic findings on CT, the CT halo sign, and the role of CT in early diagnosis. Radiology 1985;157:611-614. [Free Full Text]
Freedman LS, White SJ. On the use of Pocock and Simon's method for balancing treatment numbers over prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1976;32:691-694. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ellis M, Spence D, de Pauw B, et al. An EORTC international multicenter randomized trial (EORTC number 19923) comparing two dosages of liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:1406-1412. [Web of Science][Medline]
White MH, Anaissie EJ, Kusne S, et al. Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion vs. amphotericin B as therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:635-642. [Web of Science][Medline]
Walsh TJ, Pappas P, Winston DJ, et al. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med 2002;346:225-234. [Free Full Text]
Appendix
In addition to the authors, members of the study who recruitedpatients were as follows: R. Allen (Sacramento, Calif.), M.Aoun (Brussels, Belgium), C. Aul (Düsseldorf, Germany),M. Bjorkholm (Stockholm, Sweden), K.L. Blanchard (Shreveport,La.), M. Boogaerts (Leuven, Belgium), E. Bouza (Madrid), E.J.Bow (Winnipeg, Man.), H.R. Brodt (Frankfurt, Germany), J. Brown(Stanford, Calif.), D. Buchheidt (Mannheim, Germany), J.Y. Cahn(Besançon, France), A. Calmaggi (La Plata, Argentina),J.M. Cisneros (Seville, Spain), C. Cordonnier (Créteil,France), J. Daly (Worcester, Mass.), C.A. Da Cunha (Curitiba,Brazil), R. De Bock (Antwerp, Belgium), A. Del Favero (Perugia,Italy), J. Diaz Mediavilla (Madrid), M.C. Dignani (Buenos Aires,Argentina), C. Doyen (Yvoir, Belgium), J.S. Dummer (Nashville),B. Dupont (Paris), M. Egyed (Kaposvar, Hungary), D. Engelhard(Jerusalem, Israel), G. Fätkenheuer (Cologne, Germany),R. Feld (Toronto), D. Fière (Lyons, France), G. Fioritoni(Pescara, Italy), G. Garber (Ottawa, Ont.), Z. Gasztonyi (Gyor,Hungary), K. Godder (Columbia, S.C.), D. Graham (Springfield,Ill.), A. Gratwohl (Basel, Switzerland), R. Greenberg (Lexington,Ky.), K. High (Winston-Salem, N.C.), F. Jacobs (Brussels, Belgium),V. Krcmery (Bratislava, Slovakia), P. Kumar (Washington, D.C.),W. Langer (Essen, Germany), M. Laverdiere (Montreal), P. Ljungman(Huddinge, Sweden), H. Lode (Berlin, Germany), A. Louie (Albany,N.Y.), D. Maki (Madison, Wis.), J.P. Marie (Paris), D.J.E. Marriott(Sydney, Australia), D.S. McKinsey (Kansas City, Mo.), R. Mertelsmann(Freiburg, Germany), M.K. Nair (New Delhi, India), N. Milpied(Nantes, France), A. Nagler (Jerusalem, Israel), D. Niederwieser(Leipzig, Germany), L. Pagano (Rome), P. Pappas (Birmingham,Ala.), J. Perfect (Durham, N.C.), J. Pottage (Chicago), V. Raina(New Delhi, India), J. Reinhardt (Newark, Del.), S. Richardson(Toronto), L. Rickman (San Diego, Calif.), M. Ruhnke (Berlin,Germany), I. Salit (Toronto), W.M. Scheld (Charlottesville,Va.), S. Schuler (Dresden, Germany), M. Schuster (Philadelphia),R. Schwerdtfeger (Wiesbaden, Germany), S.D. Shafran (Edmonton,Alta.), B. Simmons (Memphis, Tenn.), M. Slavin (Parkville, Australia),M. Sokol-Anderson (St. Louis), P. Tebas (St. Louis), C. Tsoukas(Montreal), A. Ullmann (Mainz, Germany), J. Van Burik (Minneapolis),J.W. Van't Wout (Leiden, the Netherlands), E.C. Vinaya Kumar(Hyderabad, India), P. Volkow-Fernandez (Mexico City, Mexico),C. Wallrauch (Munich, Germany), H. Wandt (Nuremberg, Germany);EORTC Data Center (Brussels, Belgium): A. Marinus, C. Coens,R. Sylvester; Data-Review Committee: J.E. Bennett, D.W. Denning,C. Durand, R.E. Greene, R. Herbrecht, O. Lortholary, J.W. Oestmann,T.F. Patterson, P. Ribaud, R.H. Rubin, P. Stark, J.R. Wingard.
Data and Safety Monitoring Boards: D.G. Altman (Oxford, UnitedKingdom), J. Cohen (London), R.J. Duma (Daytona Beach, Fla.),F. Meunier (Brussels, Belgium), R.B. Pollard (Galveston, Tex.),A.S. Sugar (Boston), J. Verter (Rockville, Md.), J. Wittes (Washington,D.C.); Voriconazole team at Pfizer: M. Andrews, C. Gorman, M.R.Hodges, R. Mundayat, H.T. Schlamm, K. Smith, T. Spain, C. Suggars,P.F. Troke, J. Winslade.
Michallet, M., Ito, J. I.
(2009). Approaches to the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections in Hematologic Malignancy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. JCO
27: 3398-3409
[Abstract][Full Text]
Roze, H., Lafargue, M., Joannes-Boyau, O., Batoz, H., Dromer, C., Breilh, D., Janvier, G.
(2009). Toxicokinetics of voriconazole during massive intentional poisoning. J Antimicrob Chemother
0: dkp219v1-dkp219
[Full Text]
Narayan, S K, Kumar, K, Swaminathan, R P, Roopeshkumar, V R, Bhavna, B
(2009). Isolated cerebral aspergilloma in a young immunocompetent patient. PN
9: 166-168
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ferreira, T. B., Vaz, F., Rodrigues, A., Donato, S.
(2009). Intravitreal voriconazole as primary treatment for endogenous Aspergillus endophthalmitis. BMJ Case Reports
2009: bcr1020081110-bcr1020081110
[Abstract][Full Text]
Trifilio, S. M., Yarnold, P. R., Scheetz, M. H., Pi, J., Pennick, G., Mehta, J.
(2009). Serial Plasma Voriconazole Concentrations after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 1793-1796
[Abstract][Full Text]
van de Sande, W. W. J., Mathot, R. A. A., ten Kate, M. T., van Vianen, W., Tavakol, M., Rijnders, B. J. A., Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. J. M.
(2009). Combination Therapy of Advanced Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Transiently Neutropenic Rats Using Human Pharmacokinetic Equivalent Doses of Voriconazole and Anidulafungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 2005-2013
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bennett, J. E.
(2009). Management of mycoses in neutropenic patients: a brief history, 1960-2008. J Antimicrob Chemother
63: i23-i26
[Abstract][Full Text]
Segal, B. H.
(2009). Aspergillosis. NEJM
360: 1870-1884
[Full Text]
Cannon, R. D., Lamping, E., Holmes, A. R., Niimi, K., Baret, P. V., Keniya, M. V., Tanabe, K., Niimi, M., Goffeau, A., Monk, B. C.
(2009). Efflux-Mediated Antifungal Drug Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
22: 291-321
[Abstract][Full Text]
Perkhofer, S., Lechner, V., Lass-Florl, C.
(2009). In Vitro Activity of Isavuconazole against Aspergillus Species and Zygomycetes According to the Methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 1645-1647
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lei, H.-P., Wang, G., Wang, L.-S., Ou-yang, D.-s., Chen, H., Li, Q., Zhang, W., Tan, Z.-R., Fan, L., He, Y.-J., Zhou, H.-H.
(2009). Lack of Effect of Ginkgo biloba on Voriconazole Pharmacokinetics in Chinese Volunteers Identified as CYP2C19 Poor and Extensive Metabolizers. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
43: 726-731
[Abstract][Full Text]
Parize, P., Chandesris, M.-O., Lanternier, F., Poiree, S., Viard, J.-P., Bienvenu, B., Mimoun, M., Mechai, F., Mamzer, M.-F., Herman, P., Bougnoux, M.-E., Lecuit, M., Lortholary, O.
(2009). Antifungal Therapy of Aspergillus Invasive Otitis Externa: Efficacy of Voriconazole and Review. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 1048-1053
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cowen, L. E., Singh, S. D., Kohler, J. R., Collins, C., Zaas, A. K., Schell, W. A., Aziz, H., Mylonakis, E., Perfect, J. R., Whitesell, L., Lindquist, S.
(2009). Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
106: 2818-2823
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lass-Florl, C., Alastruey-Izquierdo, A., Cuenca-Estrella, M., Perkhofer, S., Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L.
(2009). In Vitro Activities of Various Antifungal Drugs against Aspergillus terreus: Global Assessment Using the Methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 794-795
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hlava, N., Niemann, C. U., Gropper, M. A., Melcher, M. L.
(2009). Analytic Reviews: Postoperative Infectious Complications of Abdominal Solid Organ Transplantation. J Intensive Care Med
24: 3-17
[Abstract]
Barnes, R A, White, P L, Bygrave, C, Evans, N, Healy, B, Kell, J
(2009). Clinical impact of enhanced diagnosis of invasive fungal disease in high-risk haematology and stem cell transplant patients. J. Clin. Pathol.
62: 64-69
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cornely, O. A., Bohme, A., Buchheidt, D., Einsele, H., Heinz, W. J., Karthaus, M., Krause, S. W., Kruger, W., Maschmeyer, G., Penack, O., Ritter, J., Ruhnke, M., Sandherr, M., Sieniawski, M., Vehreschild, J.-J., Wolf, H.-H., Ullmann, A. J.
(2009). Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies. Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology. haematol
94: 113-122
[Abstract][Full Text]
Howard, A., Hoffman, J., Sheth, A.
(2008). Clinical Application of Voriconazole Concentrations in the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
42: 1859-1864
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hafner, V., Albermann, N., Haefeli, W. E., Ebinger, F.
(2008). Inhibition of Voriconazole Metabolism by Chloramphenicol in an Adolescent with Central Nervous System Aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 4172-4174
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pagano, L., Fianchi, L., Caira, M.
(2008). Pulmonary aspergillosis in hematologic malignancies: lights and shadows. haematol
93: 1611-1616
[Full Text]
Danner, B. C., Didilis, V., Dorge, H., Mikroulis, D., Bougioukas, G., Schondube, F. A.
(2008). Surgical treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis in immunocompromised patients. ICVTS
7: 771-776
[Abstract][Full Text]
Arendrup, M. C., Perkhofer, S., Howard, S. J., Garcia-Effron, G., Vishukumar, A., Perlin, D., Lass-Florl, C.
(2008). Establishing In Vitro-In Vivo Correlations for Aspergillus fumigatus: the Challenge of Azoles versus Echinocandins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3504-3511
[Abstract][Full Text]
Guinea, J., Recio, S., Pelaez, T., Torres-Narbona, M., Bouza, E.
(2008). Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus Species Remain Fully Susceptible to Voriconazole in the Post-Voriconazole Era. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3444-3446
[Abstract][Full Text]
Vallon-Eberhard, A., Makovitzki, A., Beauvais, A., Latge, J.-P., Jung, S., Shai, Y.
(2008). Efficient Clearance of Aspergillus fumigatus in Murine Lungs by an Ultrashort Antimicrobial Lipopeptide, Palmitoyl-Lys-Ala-DAla-Lys. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3118-3126
[Abstract][Full Text]
Simitsopoulou, M., Roilides, E., Paliogianni, F., Likartsis, C., Ioannidis, J., Kanellou, K., Walsh, T. J.
(2008). Immunomodulatory Effects of Voriconazole on Monocytes Challenged with Aspergillus fumigatus: Differential Role of Toll-Like Receptors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3301-3306
[Abstract][Full Text]
Malani, A. N., Aronoff, D. M.
(2008). Voriconazole-Induced Photosensitivity. Clin Med Res
6: 83-85
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gravelat, F. N., Doedt, T., Chiang, L. Y., Liu, H., Filler, S. G., Patterson, T. F., Sheppard, D. C.
(2008). In Vivo Analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus Developmental Gene Expression Determined by Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR. Infect. Immun.
76: 3632-3639
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gencer, S., Ozer, S., Demirhan, G., Ak, O., Batirel, A.
(2008). Angio-oedema as an unusual tolerable side effect of voriconazole therapy. J Med Microbiol
57: 1028-1031
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cramer, R. A. Jr., Perfect, B. Z., Pinchai, N., Park, S., Perlin, D. S., Asfaw, Y. G., Heitman, J., Perfect, J. R., Steinbach, W. J.
(2008). Calcineurin Target CrzA Regulates Conidial Germination, Hyphal Growth, and Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell
7: 1085-1097
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hariprasad, S M, Mieler, W F, Lin, T K, Sponsel, W E, Graybill, J R
(2008). Voriconazole in the treatment of fungal eye infections: a review of current literature. Br. J. Ophthalmol.
92: 871-878
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cescon, D. W., Page, A. V., Richardson, S., Moore, M. J., Boerner, S., Gold, W. L.
(2008). Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Associated With Marijuana Use in a Man With Colorectal Cancer. JCO
26: 2214-2215
[Full Text]
Troke, P., Aguirrebengoa, K., Arteaga, C., Ellis, D., Heath, C. H., Lutsar, I., Rovira, M., Nguyen, Q., Slavin, M., Chen, S. C. A., on behalf of the Global Scedosporium Study Group,
(2008). Treatment of Scedosporiosis with Voriconazole: Clinical Experience with 107 Patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 1743-1750
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lewis, R. E., Albert, N. D., Kontoyiannis, D. P.
(2008). Comparison of the dose-dependent activity and paradoxical effect of caspofungin and micafungin in a neutropenic murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: 1140-1144
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chowdhry, R., Marshall, W. L.
(2008). Analytical Reviews: Antifungal Therapies in the Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med
23: 151-158
[Abstract]
Burgos, A., Zaoutis, T. E., Dvorak, C. C., Hoffman, J. A., Knapp, K. M., Nania, J. J., Prasad, P., Steinbach, W. J.
(2008). Pediatric Invasive Aspergillosis: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of 139 Contemporary Cases. Pediatrics
121: e1286-e1294
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cornely, O. A., Bohme, A., Reichert, D., Reuter, S., Maschmeyer, G., Maertens, J., Buchheidt, D., Paluszewska, M., Arenz, D., Bethe, U., Effelsberg, J., Lovenich, H., Sieniawski, M., Haas, A., Einsele, H., Eimermacher, H., Martino, R., Silling, G., Hahn, M., Wacker, S., Ullmann, A. J., Karthaus, M., on behalf of The Multinational Case Registry of th,
(2008). Risk factors for breakthrough invasive fungal infection during secondary prophylaxis. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: 939-946
[Abstract][Full Text]
Garcia-Effron, G., Dilger, A., Alcazar-Fuoli, L., Park, S., Mellado, E., Perlin, D. S.
(2008). Rapid Detection of Triazole Antifungal Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 1200-1206
[Abstract][Full Text]
Espinel-Ingroff, A., Johnson, E., Hockey, H., Troke, P.
(2008). Activities of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B in vitro against 590 moulds from 323 patients in the voriconazole Phase III clinical studies. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: 616-620
[Abstract][Full Text]
Allinson, K., Kolve, H., Gumbinger, H. G., Vormoor, H. J., Ehlert, K., Groll, A. H.
(2008). Secondary antifungal prophylaxis in paediatric allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell recipients. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: 734-742
[Abstract][Full Text]
Samarakoon, P., Soubani, A.
(2008). Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COPD: a report of five cases and systematic review of the literature. Chronic Respiratory Disease
5: 19-27
[Abstract]
Asano-Mori, Y., Kanda, Y., Oshima, K., Kako, S., Shinohara, A., Nakasone, H., Kaneko, M., Sato, H., Watanabe, T., Hosoya, N., Izutsu, K., Asai, T., Hangaishi, A., Motokura, T., Chiba, S., Kurokawa, M.
(2008). False-positive Aspergillus galactomannan antigenaemia after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: 411-416
[Abstract][Full Text]
Goodwin, M. L., Drew, R. H.
(2008). Antifungal serum concentration monitoring: an update. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: 17-25
[Abstract][Full Text]
Girmenia, C., Pizzarelli, G., Pozzi, E., Cimino, G., Gentile, G., Martino, P.
(2008). Improving outcomes of acute invasive Aspergillus rhinosinusitis n patients with hematologici malignancies or aplastic anemia: the role of voriconazole. haematol
93: 159-160
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dockrell, D. H.
(2008). Salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother
61: i41-i44
[Abstract][Full Text]
Nwakanma, L. U., Shah, A. S., Conte, J. V., Baumgartner, W. A.
(2008). Heart Transplantation. Card Surg Adult
3: 1539-1578
[Full Text]
Greene, R. E, Mauskopf, J., Roberts, C. S., Zyczynski, T., Schlamm, H. T.
(2007). Comparative cost-effectiveness of voriconazole and amphotericin B in treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Am J Health Syst Pharm
64: 2561-2568
[Abstract][Full Text]
Robenshtok, E., Gafter-Gvili, A., Goldberg, E., Weinberger, M., Yeshurun, M., Leibovici, L., Paul, M.
(2007). Antifungal Prophylaxis in Cancer Patients After Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JCO
25: 5471-5489
[Abstract][Full Text]
Levin, M.-D., den Hollander, J. G., van der Holt, B., Rijnders, B. J., van Vliet, M., Sonneveld, P., van Schaik, R. H. N.
(2007). Hepatotoxicity of oral and intravenous voriconazole in relation to cytochrome P450 polymorphisms. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 1104-1107
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fuhrmann, V., Schenk, P., Jaeger, W., Miksits, M., Kneidinger, N., Warszawska, J., Holzinger, U., Kitzberger, R., Thalhammer, F.
(2007). Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole during continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 1085-1090
[Abstract][Full Text]
Plummer, R., Bodkin, J., Power, D., Pantarat, N., Bubb, W. A., Kuchel, P. W., Sorrell, T. C.
(2007). Effect of Caspofungin on Metabolite Profiles of Aspergillus Species Determined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 4077-4084
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bulpa, P., Dive, A., Sibille, Y.
(2007). Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J
30: 782-800
[Abstract][Full Text]
Safdar, A.
(2007). Difficulties with Fungal Infections in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Patients: Immune Enhancement Strategies. The Oncologist
12: 2-6
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mowat, E., Butcher, J., Lang, S., Williams, C., Ramage, G.
(2007). Development of a simple model for studying the effects of antifungal agents on multicellular communities of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Med Microbiol
56: 1205-1212
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schmidt, V., Demiraj, F., Di Somma, A., Bailey, T., Ungemach, F. R., Krautwald-Junghanns, M-E.
(2007). Plasma concentrations of voriconazole in falcons. Vet Rec.
161: 265-268
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ament, A. J. H. A., Hubben, M. W. A., Verweij, P. E., de Groot, R., Warris, A., Donnelly, J. P., Wout, J. v. t, Severens, J. L.
(2007). Economic evaluation of targeted treatments of invasive aspergillosis in adult haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in the Netherlands: a modelling approach. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 385-393
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lass-Florl, C., Grif, K., Kontoyiannis, D. P.
(2007). Molecular Typing of Aspergillus terreus Isolates Collected in Houston, Texas, and Innsbruck, Austria: Evidence of Great Genetic Diversity. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 2686-2690
[Abstract][Full Text]
Weiler, S., Bellmann, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Lewis, R. E., Krause, D. S., van Nieuwkoop, C., van Dissel, J. T., Ullmann, A. J., Chandrasekar, P., Patino, H., Cornely, O. A., Ullmann, A. J., Hardalo, C.
(2007). Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Hematologic Cancer. NEJM
356: 2214-2218
[Full Text]
Camuset, J., Nunes, H., Dombret, M.-C., Bergeron, A., Henno, P., Philippe, B., Dauriat, G., Mangiapan, G., Rabbat, A., Cadranel, J.
(2007). Treatment of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis by Voriconazole in Nonimmunocompromised Patients. Chest
131: 1435-1441
[Abstract][Full Text]
Warwas, M. L., Watson, J. N., Bennet, A. J., Moore, M. M.
(2007). Structure and role of sialic acids on the surface of Aspergillus fumigatus conidiospores. Glycobiology
17: 401-410
[Abstract][Full Text]
(2007). Tender Erythema of the Left Lower Extremity--Diagnosis. Arch Dermatol
143: 535-540
[Full Text]
Blyth, C. C., Palasanthiran, P., O'Brien, T. A.
(2007). Antifungal Therapy in Children With Invasive Fungal Infections: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics
119: 772-784
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dodds Ashley, E. S., Zaas, A. K., Fang, A. F., Damle, B., Perfect, J. R.
(2007). Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Voriconazole Administered Orally as either Crushed or Whole Tablets. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 877-880
[Abstract][Full Text]
Simitsopoulou, M., Roilides, E., Likartsis, C., Ioannidis, J., Orfanou, A., Paliogianni, F., Walsh, T. J.
(2007). Expression of Immunomodulatory Genes in Human Monocytes Induced by Voriconazole in the Presence of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 1048-1054
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ullmann, A. J., Lipton, J. H., Vesole, D. H., Chandrasekar, P., Langston, A., Tarantolo, S. R., Greinix, H., Morais de Azevedo, W., Reddy, V., Boparai, N., Pedicone, L., Patino, H., Durrant, S.
(2007). Posaconazole or Fluconazole for Prophylaxis in Severe Graft-versus-Host Disease. NEJM
356: 335-347
[Abstract][Full Text]
De Pauw, B. E., Donnelly, J. P.
(2007). Prophylaxis and Aspergillosis -- Has the Principle Been Proven?. NEJM
356: 409-411
[Full Text]
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J.
(2007). Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
20: 133-163
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pascual, A., Nieth, V., Calandra, T., Bille, J., Bolay, S., Decosterd, L. A., Buclin, T., Majcherczyk, P. A., Sanglard, D., Marchetti, O.
(2007). Variability of Voriconazole Plasma Levels Measured by New High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Bioassay Methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 137-143
[Abstract][Full Text]
Garcia-Vidal, C., Carratala, J., Bennett, J. E.
(2006). Echinocandins for Candidemia. NEJM
355: 2791-2792
[Full Text]
Warn, P. A., Sharp, A., Mosquera, J., Spickermann, J., Schmitt-Hoffmann, A., Heep, M., Denning, D. W.
(2006). Comparative in vivo activity of BAL4815, the active component of the prodrug BAL8557, in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated Aspergillus flavus. J Antimicrob Chemother
58: 1198-1207
[Abstract][Full Text]
Martino, R., Parody, R., Fukuda, T., Maertens, J., Theunissen, K., Ho, A., Mufti, G. J., Kroger, N., Zander, A. R., Heim, D., Paluszewska, M., Selleslag, D., Steinerova, K., Ljungman, P., Cesaro, S., Nihtinen, A., Cordonnier, C., Vazquez, L., Lopez-Duarte, M., Lopez, J., Cabrera, R., Rovira, M., Neuburger, S., Cornely, O., Hunter, A. E., Marr, K. A., Dornbusch, H. J., Einsele, H.
(2006). Impact of the intensity of the pretransplantation conditioning regimen in patients with prior invasive aspergillosis undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective survey of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood
108: 2928-2936
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cornet, M., Gaillardin, C., Richard, M. L.
(2006). Deletions of the Endocytic Components VPS28 and VPS32 in Candida albicans Lead to Echinocandin and Azole Hypersensitivity.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 3492-3495
[Abstract][Full Text]
Balajee, S. A., Nickle, D., Varga, J., Marr, K. A.
(2006). Molecular Studies Reveal Frequent Misidentification of Aspergillus fumigatus by Morphotyping.. Eukaryot Cell
5: 1705-1712
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dannaoui, E., Garcia-Hermoso, D., Naccache, J. M., Meneau, I., Sanglard, D., Bouges-Michel, C., Valeyre, D., Lortholary, O.
(2006). Use of voriconazole in a patient with aspergilloma caused by an itraconazole-resistant strain of Aspergillus fumigatus.. J Med Microbiol
55: 1457-1459
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ito, J. I., Lyons, J. M., Hong, T. B., Tamae, D., Liu, Y.-K., Wilczynski, S. P., Kalkum, M.
(2006). Vaccinations with Recombinant Variants of Aspergillus fumigatus Allergen Asp f 3 Protect Mice against Invasive Aspergillosis. Infect. Immun.
74: 5075-5084
[Abstract][Full Text]
Guetgemann, A., Brandenburg, V. M., Ketteler, M., Riehl, J., Floege, J.
(2006). Unclear fever 7 weeks after renal transplantation in a 56-year-old patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant
21: 2325-2327
[Full Text]
Agarwal, R., Singh, N.
(2006). Amphotericin B is still the drug of choice for invasive aspergillosis.. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
174: 102-102
[Full Text]
Segal, B. H., Walsh, T. J.
(2006). Amphotericin B Is Still the Drug of Choice for Invasive Aspergillosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
174: 102a-103
[Full Text]
Enoch, D. A., Ludlam, H. A., Brown, N. M.
(2006). Invasive fungal infections: a review of epidemiology and management options.. J Med Microbiol
55: 809-818
[Abstract][Full Text]
Curigliano, G., Formica, V., De Pas, T., Spitaleri, G., Pietri, E., Fazio, N., de Braud, F., Goldhirsch, A.
(2006). Life-threatening toxic epidermal necrolysis during voriconazole therapy for invasive aspergillosis after chemotherapy. Ann Oncol
17: 1174-1175
[Full Text]
Olson, J. A., Adler-Moore, J. P., Schwartz, J., Jensen, G. M., Proffitt, R. T.
(2006). Comparative efficacies, toxicities, and tissue concentrations of amphotericin B lipid formulations in a murine pulmonary aspergillosis model.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 2122-2131
[Abstract][Full Text]
den Hollander, J. G., van Arkel, C., Rijnders, B. J., Lugtenburg, P. J., de Marie, S., Levin, M.-D.
(2006). Incidence of voriconazole hepatotoxicity during intravenous and oral treatment for invasive fungal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother
57: 1248-1250
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chen, C.-Y., Kumar, R. N., Feng, Y.-H., Ho, C.-H., You, J.-Y., Liao, C.-C., Tseng, C.-H., Mavros, P., Gerth, W. C., Chen, Y.-C.
(2006). Treatment outcomes in patients receiving conventional amphotericin B therapy: a prospective multicentre study in Taiwan. J Antimicrob Chemother
57: 1181-1188
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hachem, R., Bahna, P., Hanna, H., Stephens, L. C., Raad, I.
(2006). EDTA as an adjunct antifungal agent for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in a rodent model.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 1823-1827
[Abstract][Full Text]
Capitano, B., Potoski, B. A., Husain, S., Zhang, S., Paterson, D. L., Studer, S. M., McCurry, K. R., Venkataramanan, R.
(2006). Intrapulmonary penetration of voriconazole in patients receiving an oral prophylactic regimen.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 1878-1880
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tattevin, P., Le Tulzo, Y., Schwartz, S., Ruhnke, M., Ribaud, P., Corey, L., Driscoll, T., Cornely, O. A., Schuler, U., Lutsar, I., Troke, P., Thiel, E.
(2006). Improved outcome in central nervous system aspergillosis. Blood
107: 3410-3412
[Full Text]
Petraitis, V., Petraitiene, R., Solomon, J., Kelaher, A. M., Murray, H. A., Mya-San, C., Bhandary, A. K., Sein, T., Avila, N. A., Basevicius, A., Bacher, J., Walsh, T. J.
(2006). Multidimensional volumetric imaging of pulmonary infiltrates for measuring therapeutic response to antifungal therapy in experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 1510-1517
[Abstract][Full Text]
Smith, J., Safdar, N., Knasinski, V., Simmons, W., Bhavnani, S. M., Ambrose, P. G., Andes, D.
(2006). Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 1570-1572
[Abstract][Full Text]
van Vianen, W., de Marie, S., ten Kate, M. T., Mathot, R. A. A., Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. J. M.
(2006). Caspofungin: antifungal activity in vitro, pharmacokinetics, and effects on fungal load and animal survival in neutropenic rats with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother
57: 732-740
[Abstract][Full Text]
Segal, B. H., Walsh, T. J.
(2006). Current Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
173: 707-717
[Abstract][Full Text]