The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 348:1435-1441 April 10, 2003 Number 15
NextNext

An Association between Atherosclerosis and Venous Thrombosis
Paolo Prandoni, M.D., Ph.D., Franca Bilora, M.D., Antonio Marchiori, M.D., Enrico Bernardi, M.D., Francesco Petrobelli, M.D., Anthonie W.A. Lensing, M.D., Ph.D., Martin H. Prins, M.D., Ph.D., and Antonio Girolami, M.D.

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background In about a third of patients with venous thromboembolism, the cause of the disorder is unexplained. In patients with atherosclerosis, activation of both platelets and blood coagulation and an increase in fibrin turnover are detectable, which may lead to thrombotic complications. Whether atherosclerosis is associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis is unknown.

Methods We performed ultrasonography of the carotid arteries in 299 unselected patients who had deep venous thrombosis of the legs without symptomatic atherosclerosis and in 150 control subjects. Patients with spontaneous thrombosis, patients with secondary thrombosis from acquired risk factors, and control subjects were assessed for plaques.

Results At least one carotid plaque was detected in 72 of the 153 patients with spontaneous thrombosis (47.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 39.1 to 55.0), 40 of the 146 with secondary thrombosis (27.4 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 20.2 to 34.6), and 48 of the 150 control subjects (32.0 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 24.5 to 39.5). The odds ratios for carotid plaques in patients with spontaneous thrombosis, as compared with patients with secondary thrombosis and with controls, were 2.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 3.7) and 1.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.9), respectively. In a multivariate analysis that accounted for risk factors for atherosclerosis, the strength of this association did not change.

Conclusions There is an association between atherosclerotic disease and spontaneous venous thrombosis. Atherosclerosis may induce venous thrombosis, or the two conditions may share common risk factors.


Venous thromboembolism is a serious and potentially fatal disease affecting approximately 2 persons per 1000 each year in Western countries.1,2,3,4,5 Although considerable progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of this disorder, many questions remain concerning its pathogenesis. Classic risk factors for venous thrombosis include cancer, surgery, immobilization, fractures, paralysis, pregnancy, childbirth, and use of estrogens.6,7,8 These conditions not only predispose apparently normal people to thrombosis but also are likely to trigger episodes in patients with prothrombotic tendencies.9 Although acquired or inherited risk factors potentially responsible for this disorder are identifiable in most patients, the disease still remains unexplained in up to 30 percent of patients.6,7,8,9,10,11,12

We hypothesized that patients with atherosclerosis may be at increased risk for venous thrombosis. Indeed, older age (a well-known risk factor for atherosclerosis) has long been identified as an independent risk factor for venous thrombosis.1,2,6,7,8 A few case–control and prospective studies have found an association between venous thromboembolic disorders and chronic arterial disease of the legs, hyperlipidemia, or hypertension.13,14,15,16 Furthermore, atherosclerosis is associated with activation of both platelets and blood coagulation as well as an increase in fibrin turnover, which can lead to thrombotic complications.17,18,19,20,21,22,23

In subjects without symptomatic atherosclerosis, carotid plaques are considered a reliable marker of arterial disease elsewhere in the circulation.24,25,26,27,28 To determine whether an association exists between asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease and the risk of venous thromboembolism, we assessed whether vessel-wall plaques were present and, if so, quantified them by means of carotid-artery ultrasonography in a consecutive series of patients with acute venous thrombosis and in a control group of subjects without thrombosis. We compared the frequency and characteristics of carotid plaques among patients with spontaneous thrombosis, patients with secondary thrombosis as a result of acquired risk factors, and control subjects without thrombosis.

Methods

Study Design and Objective

This was a case–control study to evaluate the potential relation between asymptomatic carotid-wall plaques and acute spontaneous deep venous thrombosis. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Padua University, in Padua, Italy. All subjects provided written informed consent.

Patients

All consecutive outpatients admitted to our institution between March 1996 and April 2001 with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis, as assessed by compression ultrasonography, were eligible for the study. Patients with a history of either venous thromboembolism or symptomatic atherosclerosis (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute myocardial infarction, angina, or intermittent claudication) were excluded, as were pregnant patients and those who declined to participate. All recruited patients were hospitalized and received conventional treatment (i.e., unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin followed by oral anticoagulant therapy).10

Patients were classified as having secondary thrombosis if they had cancer, had given birth within the previous three months, had had leg trauma or fracture, had been immobilized for more than one week, or took estrogens; all other patients were classified as having spontaneous thrombosis. Screening for mutations and conditions associated with thrombophilia (antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency; factor V Leiden; prothrombin G20210A mutation; hyperhomocysteinemia; and lupus-like anticoagulants) was left to the discretion of treating physicians and was performed according to previously described methods.29,30,31,32,33 Carriers of thrombophilia were classified as having spontaneous or secondary thrombosis according to their clinical presentation.

During the study period, 150 control subjects were randomly selected from patients who were admitted for conditions unrelated to venous thromboembolism or atherosclerosis and who had no clinical evidence or history of such diseases. As each patient with spontaneous venous thrombosis was recruited, the first patient admitted to the same room in the ward who was frequency-matched for age (in five-year age groups) and sex to the qualifying patient was selected as the control. If that patient declined to participate, the next patient admitted who met the requirements was selected as the control.

Before undergoing carotid-artery ultrasonography, patients with thrombosis and control subjects were evaluated for the presence of risk factors for atherosclerosis.34 On the basis of a clinical examination, biochemical tests, or both, data on the following variables were recorded on a standard form: smoking status, with smoking defined as habitual, daily use of 10 or more cigarettes, with interruptions of less than one month; hypertension, defined by a systolic blood pressure of more than 160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of more than 90 mm Hg (or both) on at least two occasions or by the use of hypotensive drugs; obesity, defined by a body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of more than 30; diabetes mellitus, defined by a plasma glucose level of at least 126 mg per deciliter (7.0 mmol per liter) after an overnight fast on at least two occasions or a level of at least 200 mg per deciliter (11.1 mmol per liter) 2 hours after the administration of 75 g of oral glucose and at least once between 0 and 2 hours or by the use of antidiabetic drugs; and hyperlipidemia, defined by a fasting venous cholesterol level exceeding 240 mg per deciliter (6.2 mmol per liter), or a fasting venous triglyceride level exceeding 250 mg per deciliter (2.8 mmol per liter) on at least two occasions, or by the use of lipid-lowering drugs.

Ultrasonography of Carotid Arteries

Bilateral assessment of the carotid arteries was performed by a trained operator who was unaware of the patients' clinical status. The test was carried out with an Apogee 800 Plus device (Advanced Technology Laboratories), with an 8.5-MHz probe for B-mode imaging and a 6-MHz probe for pulsed-wave color Doppler imaging according to standardized methods.35,36 Patients were examined in the supine position with their neck rotated 45 degrees in the direction opposite the site being examined. The carotid trunk was identified with the use of both B-mode and pulsed-wave color Doppler ultrasonography, and the following segments were examined: common carotid artery, carotid bifurcation, and internal and external carotid arteries. All arteries underwent longitudinal and transverse scanning as well as a flow analysis.

Plaque was defined as a protrusion into the vessel lumen of at least 2 mm, as measured from the border between the adventitial and medial layers.35,36 The percentage of vessel obstruction was measured along the longitudinal axis and classified as stenosis of up to 30 percent, stenosis of 31 to 50 percent, stenosis of 51 to 70 percent, or stenosis of 71 to 100 percent. When more than one plaque was found, the greatest degree of obstruction was recorded, as well as the number and site of associated ipsilateral and contralateral smaller lesions. In addition, the measure of the intima–media thickness of the right and left common carotid arteries was obtained 1 to 3 cm proximally to the carotid bifurcation and expressed in millimeters. The higher of the two values was recorded.

The reproducibility of the ultrasonographic assessment of carotid atherosclerosis was evaluated in 100 consecutive patients by having the test repeated by another operator within one hour after the first examination.

Statistical Analysis

The clinical characteristics of patients with thrombosis and control subjects were compared with use of the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for dichotomous variables. The presence of carotid plaques in the three groups was assessed with logistic-regression analyses. Results were expressed as odds ratios with 95 percent confidence intervals. Initially, the three groups were assessed with use of a pairwise univariate comparison. Then, risk factors for atherosclerosis (age, sex, smoking status, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes) were introduced in a multivariate model in which the three groups were included with the use of dummy variables. In analyses taking into account only the patients with thrombosis, the odds ratio for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with spontaneous thrombosis, as compared with those with secondary venous thrombosis, was adjusted for the presence or absence of thrombophilia and risk factors of atherosclerosis. Finally, the relation between spontaneous thrombosis and the presence of carotid plaques was assessed in subgroups of patients older than 60 years and older than 70 years.

The measure of the intima–media thickness of the common carotid arteries was expressed in each group as the mean ±SD, and the analysis of variance was used to compare the study groups. Kappa statistics were used to assess interobserver variability of the ultrasonographic assessment of carotid plaques. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistical software (version 9.0).

Results

Study Population

Of 378 consecutive outpatients admitted with proximal-vein thrombosis, 76 were excluded, 33 because of previous venous thromboembolism and 43 because of symptomatic atherosclerosis. Of the remaining 302 patients, 299 provided written informed consent and were included in the study.

On the basis of the clinical presentation, 153 patients had spontaneous thrombosis and 146 had secondary thrombosis (cases associated with active cancer in 65, recent trauma or fracture in 44, recent surgery in 16, prolonged immobilization in 10, use of estrogens in 8, and recent childbirth in 3). During the study period, 150 eligible control subjects gave their consent and were enrolled in the study. They had been admitted to the hospital for the following reasons: infectious diseases in 20, cardiac causes in 18, respiratory conditions in 18, neoplastic conditions in 17, gastrointestinal causes in 16, rheumatic conditions in 15, hematologic conditions in 15, neurologic conditions in 11, hepatic disease in 8, renal disease in 7, and endocrinologic diseases in 5.

Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the study subjects as well as the prevalence of risk factors for atherosclerosis. The three study groups were similar with regard to these features. Symptomatic pulmonary embolism was present in 32 patients with spontaneous thrombosis (20.9 percent) and in 33 patients with secondary thrombosis (22.6 percent). Thrombophilic abnormalities were identified in 25 of the 68 patients with spontaneous thrombosis (36.8 percent) who were screened for thrombophilia and in 15 of the 64 patients with secondary thrombosis (23.4 percent) in whom this determination was made (Table 1).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Main Characteristics of the Study Population.

 
Carotid Plaques

At least one carotid plaque was detected in 72 of the 153 patients with spontaneous thrombosis (47.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 39.1 to 55.0), 40 of the 146 with secondary thrombosis (27.4 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 20.2 to 34.6), and 48 of the 150 control subjects (32.0 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 24.5 to 39.5). In the univariate logistic-regression analysis, patients with spontaneous thrombosis were more likely to have carotid plaques than those with secondary thrombosis (odds ratio, 2.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 3.7) or controls (odds ratio, 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.9). Patients with secondary thrombosis had a risk of atherosclerotic lesions similar to that of control subjects (odds ratio, 0.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 1.3).

In the multivariate analysis, after taking into account risk factors for atherosclerosis, the odds ratio for carotid plaques in patients with spontaneous thrombosis as compared with those with secondary thrombosis and with controls was 2.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 4.0). The odds in patients with secondary thrombosis did not differ significantly from those in control subjects (odds ratio, 0.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 1.5).

In logistic-regression models that included only patients with venous thrombosis, the strength of the association between spontaneous thrombosis and the presence of any carotid lesions remained significant and of similar magnitude (odds ratio, 2.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 3.7). The value of this association did not change after adjustment for risk factors for atherosclerosis and thrombophilic abnormalities (adjusted odds ratio, 2.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.9). The association between spontaneous thrombosis and the presence of carotid plaques grew stronger with age, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 5.4) among patients older than 60 years and an adjusted odds ratio of 3.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 8.4) among patients older than 70 years.

Reproducibility of Ultrasonographic Assessments of Carotid Plaques

The interobserver variability of the ultrasonographic assessment of carotid atherosclerosis was high (kappa = 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.75 to 0.97).

Additional Observations

The characteristics of the carotid plaque producing the greatest degree of obstruction are shown in Table 2. The number and location of associated smaller ipsilateral and contralateral plaques are given in Table 3.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characteristics of the Plaque Producing the Largest Degree of Obstruction in Subjects with at Least One Plaque.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Number and Location of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Minor Carotid Lesions.

 
The mean intima–media thickness of the common carotid arteries was 1.06±0.46 mm in patients with spontaneous thrombosis, 0.83±0.32 in those with secondary thrombosis, and 0.88±0.32 in the control subjects. A significant difference was found between patients with spontaneous thrombosis and both those with secondary thrombosis and control subjects (P<0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between patients with secondary thrombosis and control subjects (P=0.80).

Discussion

Our study demonstrates a relation between asymptomatic atherosclerotic lesions and spontaneous venous thrombosis of the legs. The prevalence of carotid plaques was significantly higher in patients with unexplained thrombotic events (47.1 percent) than in those with secondary ones (27.4 percent) or in age- and sex-matched subjects without thrombosis (32.0 percent). This association was still present after adjustment for risk factors for atherosclerosis and thrombophilic conditions. When the analysis was confined to elderly patients, the association became even stronger. In addition, other features of atherosclerosis (such as intima–media thickness of the carotid arteries, the degree of carotid stenosis, the number of plaques, the number of carotid segments involved, and the extent of contralateral carotid involvement) were far more frequent among subjects with spontaneous thrombosis than in the other two groups. Since carotid plaques represent a marker of arterial disease elsewhere in the circulation,24,25,26,27,28 our results suggest either that atherosclerosis can induce venous thrombosis or that the two conditions share common risk factors.

Atherosclerosis is associated with activation of platelets and blood coagulation, as well as increased fibrin turnover.17,18,19,20,21,22,23 A role of this prothrombotic state in promoting venous thrombosis is plausible, on the basis of the assumption that activated platelets and coagulation factors appear in the slow-flowing venous system. High D-dimer levels have been found to be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism37,38 and recurrent venous thromboembolism.39 In addition, old age, arterial occlusive disease of the legs, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.1,2,13,14,15,16 Finally, two recent studies have shown that, surprisingly enough, the use of statins reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism.40,41 Since users of non-statin lipid-lowering agents were not at lower risk of venous thrombosis,40 the reduction in venous thromboembolism observed in statin users might be explained by the ability of statins to improve endothelial function and prevent the development and destabilization of atherosclerotic lesions.42

Hyperhomocysteinemia, factor V Leiden, and lupus anticoagulant are potential risk factors for both atherosclerosis and venous thrombosis.43,44,45,46 In our study, a systematic search for these abnormalities was performed in about half the patients. These factors did not explain the observed association between spontaneous thrombosis and atherosclerotic lesions.

We investigated the relation between atherosclerosis and venous thrombosis by comparing the prevalence of carotid plaques in patients with spontaneous thrombosis and patients with secondary thrombosis. We used patients with secondary thrombosis as a comparison group because these patients have the same disease but have a probable cause of their thrombotic disorder. The prevalence of carotid lesions in patients with secondary thrombosis did not differ significantly from that in control subjects without thrombosis. Our prevalence figures are consistent with findings from several population-based studies in asymptomatic subjects conducted in the United States and European countries, including Italy.24,47 Since patients with spontaneous venous thrombosis had a significantly higher prevalence of asymptomatic carotid plaques than did patients with secondary thrombosis or control subjects, our results suggest that there is a strong relation between atherosclerosis and venous thrombosis of the legs.

Care was taken to avoid bias. The presence of risk factors for atherosclerosis was evaluated and recorded on a standard form before carotid-artery ultrasonography was performed. Ultrasonography was performed according to accepted guidelines by a trained physician unaware of patients' clinical data. The interobserver reproducibility of the ultrasonographic assessment of carotid plaques was established in a subgroup of 100 patients and found to be high. Moreover, in the statistical analysis, adjustments were made for the confounding effects of risk factors for atherosclerosis and thrombophilic abnormalities. Finally, control subjects were randomly selected by enrolling the first patient admitted to the same room in the ward who met the frequency-matching criteria for age and sex.

Although our results do not establish a causative role of atherosclerosis in venous thromboembolism, they suggest the existence of a link between arterial and venous disorders, which opens important new avenues for further research, including the potential role of statins and antiplatelet agents as preventive interventions.

We are indebted to Mrs. Alessandra Carta for her valuable advice, and to Mr. John Suárez for his help in reviewing the manuscript.


Source Information

From the Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Second Chair of Internal Medicine, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy (P.P., F.B., A.M., E.B., F.P., A.G.); the Center for Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (A.W.A.L.); and the Department of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.H.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Prandoni at the Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Second Chair of Internal Medicine, University of Padua, Via Ospedale Civile 105, 35128 Padua, Italy, or at paoprand{at}tin.it.

References

  1. Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: the Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:933-938. [Free Full Text]
  2. Nordström M, Lindbläd B, Bergqvist D, Kjellström T. A prospective study of the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis within a defined urban population. J Intern Med 1992;232:155-160. [Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Hansson PO, Welin L, Tibblin G, Eriksson H. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the general population: `the Study of Men Born in 1913.' Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1665-1670. [Free Full Text]
  4. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:585-593. [Free Full Text]
  5. Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. Thromb Haemost 2000;83:657-660. [Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Prandoni P, ten Cate JW. Epidemiology, risk factors, and natural history of venous thromboembolism. In: Oudkerk M, van Beek EJR, ten Cate JW, eds. Pulmonary embolism. Berlin, Germany: Blackwell Science, 1999:2-32.
  7. Kearon C, Salzman EW, Hirsh J. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and natural history of venous thrombosis. In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Clowes AW, George JN, eds. Hemostasis and thrombosis: basic principles & clinical practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:1153-78.
  8. Heit J. Venous thromboembolism epidemiology: implications for prevention and management. Semin Thromb Hemost 2002;28:Suppl 2:3-13. 
  9. Bauer KA. The thrombophilias: well-defined risk factors with uncertain therapeutic implications. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:367-373. [Free Full Text]
  10. Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Prins MH, Büller HR. Deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1999;353:479-485. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Cogo A, et al. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:1-7. [Free Full Text]
  12. Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Büller HR, et al. Deep-vein thrombosis and the incidence of subsequent symptomatic cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1128-1133. [Abstract]
  13. Cogo A, Bernardi E, Prandoni P, et al. Acquired risk factors for deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:164-168. [Free Full Text]
  14. Libertiny G, Hands L. Deep venous thrombosis in peripheral vascular disease. Br J Surg 1999;86:907-910. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Goldhaber SZ, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, et al. A prospective study of risk factors for pulmonary embolism in women. JAMA 1997;277:642-645. [Free Full Text]
  16. Vaya A, Mira Y, Ferrando F, et al. Hyperlipidaemia and venous thromboembolism in patients lacking thrombophilic risk factors. Br J Haematol 2002;118:255-259. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Libby P, Simon DI. Thrombosis and atherosclerosis. In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Clowes AW, George JN, eds. Hemostasis and thrombosis: basic principles & clinical practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:743-52.
  18. Libby P. Multiple mechanisms of thrombosis complicating atherosclerotic plaques. Clin Cardiol 2000;23:Suppl 6:VI-3.
  19. Sueishi K, Ichikawa K, Kato K, Nakagawa K, Chen YX. Atherosclerosis: coagulation and fibrinolysis. Semin Thromb Hemost 1998;24:255-260. [Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Holvoet P, Collen D. Thrombosis and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 1997;8:320-328. [Web of Science][Medline]
  21. FitzGerald GA, Tigges J, Barry P, Lawson JA. Markers of platelet activation and oxidant stress in atherothrombotic disease. Thromb Haemost 1997;78:280-284. [Medline]
  22. Drouet L, Mazoyer E, Bal dit Sollier C, Hainaud P, Ripoll L. Participation des mécanismes de la thrombose et de l'hémostase aux étapes initiales de l'athérosclérose. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1998;91:41-51. 
  23. Koenig W, Rothenbacher D, Hoffmeister A, Griesshammer M, Brenner H. Plasma fibrin D-dimer levels and risk of stable coronary artery disease: results of a large case-control study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21:1701-1705. [Free Full Text]
  24. Eikelboom BC. The prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery disease. In: Bernstein EF, Callow AD, Nicolaides AN, Shifrin EG, eds. Cerebral revascularisation. London: Med-Orion, 1993:451-6.
  25. Joakimsen O, Bonaa KH, Stensland-Bugge E, Jacobsen BK. Age and sex differences in the distribution and ultrasound morphology of carotid atherosclerosis: the Tromso Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:3007-3013. [Free Full Text]
  26. Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, et al. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke 1999;30:841-850. [Free Full Text]
  27. Binaghi F, Fronteddu PF, Putzu V, Cannas F, Pitzus F. Associazione tra lesioni carotidee valuate mediante eco color-Doppler efattori di rischio cardiovascolari in una casistica di soggetti in età geriatrica. Minerva Cardioangiol 1998;46:217-227. [Medline]
  28. Hollander M, Bots ML, Del Sol AI, et al. Carotid plaques increase the risk of stroke and subtypes of cerebral infarction in asymptomatic elderly: the Rotterdam study. Circulation 2002;105:2872-2877. [Free Full Text]
  29. Simioni P, Sanson BJ, Prandoni P, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in families with inherited thrombophilia. Thromb Haemost 1999;81:198-202. [Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Simioni P, Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with an Arg506->Gln mutation in the gene for factor V (factor V Leiden). N Engl J Med 1997;336:399-403. [Free Full Text]
  31. Simioni P, Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, et al. Risk for subsequent venous thromboembolic complications in carriers of the prothrombin or the factor V gene mutation with a first episode of deep-vein thrombosis. Blood 2000;96:3329-3333. [Free Full Text]
  32. Simioni P, Prandoni P, Burlina A, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and deep-vein thrombosis: a case-control study. Thromb Haemost 1996;76:883-886. [Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Simioni P, Prandoni P, Zanon E, et al. Deep venous thrombosis and lupus anticoagulant: a case-control study. Thromb Haemost 1996;76:187-189. [Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Tierney LM Jr, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, eds. Current medical diagnosis & treatment. 39th ed. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, 2000.
  35. Bernstein EF. Current noninvasive evaluation of extracranial arterial disease. In: Bernstein EF, Callow AD, Nicolaides AN, Shifrin EG, eds. Cerebral revascularisation. London: Med-Orion, 1993:73-83.
  36. Zierler RE. Real-time color flow Doppler carotid imaging. In: Bernstein EF, ed. Vascular diagnosis. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993:328-32.
  37. Andreescu ACM, Cushman M, Rosendaal FR. D-Dimer as a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis: the Leiden Thrombophilia Study. Thromb Haemost 2002;87:47-51. [Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Prins MH, Hirsh J. A critical review of the evidence supporting a relationship between impaired fibrinolytic activity and venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1721-1731. [Free Full Text]
  39. Palareti G, Legnani C, Cosmi B, Guazzaloca G, Pancani C, Coccheri S. Risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence: high negative predictive value of D-dimer performed after oral anticoagulation is stopped. Thromb Haemost 2002;87:7-12. [Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Ray JG, Mamdani M, Tsuyuki RT, Anderson DR, Yeo EL, Laupacis A. Use of statins and the subsequent development of deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1405-1410. [Free Full Text]
  41. Grady D, Wenger NK, Herrington D, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy increases risk for venous thromboembolic disease: the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:689-696. [Free Full Text]
  42. Ray JG, Rosendaal FR. The role of dyslipidemia and statins in venous thromboembolism. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2001;2:165-70.
  43. Foley PW, Irvine CD, Standen GR, et al. Activated protein C resistance, factor V Leiden and peripheral vascular disease. Cardiovasc Surg 1997;5:157-160. [CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Gaustadnes M, Rudiger N, Moller J, Rasmussen K, Bjerregaard Larsen T, Ingerslev J. Thrombophilic predisposition in stroke and venous thromboembolism in Danish patients. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1999;10:251-259. [Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Marder VJ, Matei DE. Hereditary and acquired thrombophilic syndromes. In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Clowes AW, George JN, eds. Hemostasis and thrombosis: basic principles & clinical practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:1243-76.
  46. Triplett DA. Risk factors for coronary artery disease. Hemostasis News 2001;6:1-5.
  47. Prati P, Vanuzzo D, Casaroli M, et al. Prevalence and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis in a general population. Stroke 1992;23:1705-1711. [Free Full Text]

 

This Article
-Abstract
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation

Related Letters:

An Association between Atherosclerosis and Venous Thrombosis
Duggirala M. K., Cook D. A., Mauck K. F., Tai Y. F., Prandoni P., Lensing A. W.A., Prins M. H.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 349:401-402, Jul 24, 2003. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.