Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Recordings in Patients with Treated Hypertension
Denis L. Clement, M.D., Ph.D., Marc L. De Buyzere, B.Sc., Dirk A. De Bacquer, Ph.D., Peter W. de Leeuw, M.D., Ph.D., Daniel A. Duprez, M.D., Ph.D., Robert H. Fagard, M.D., Ph.D., Peter J. Gheeraert, M.D., Luc H. Missault, M.D., Jacob J. Braun, M.D., Roland O. Six, M.D., Patricia Van Der Niepen, M.D., Eoin O'Brien, M.D., Ph.D., for the Office versus Ambulatory Pressure Study Investigators
Background It is uncertain whether ambulatory blood-pressuremeasurements recorded for 24 hours in patients with treatedhypertension predict cardiovascular events independently ofblood-pressure measurements obtained in the physician's officeand other cardiovascular risk factors.
Methods We assessed the association between base-line ambulatoryblood pressures in treated patients and subsequent cardiovascularevents among 1963 patients with a median follow-up of 5 years(range, 1 to 66 months).
Results We documented new cardiovascular events in 157 patients.In a Cox proportional-hazards model with adjustment for age,sex, smoking status, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus,serum cholesterol concentration, body-mass index, use or nonuseof lipid-lowering drugs, and presence or absence of a historyof cardiovascular events, as well as blood pressure measuredat the physician's office, higher mean values for 24-hour ambulatorysystolic and diastolic blood pressure were independent riskfactors for new cardiovascular events. The adjusted relativerisk of cardiovascular events associated with a 1-SD incrementin blood pressure was 1.34 (95 percent confidence interval,1.11 to 1.62) for 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure,1.30 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.58) for ambulatorysystolic blood pressure during the daytime, and 1.27 (95 percentconfidence interval, 1.07 to 1.57) for ambulatory systolic bloodpressure during the nighttime. For ambulatory diastolic bloodpressure, the corresponding relative risks of cardiovascularevents associated with a 1-SD increment were 1.21 (95 percentconfidence interval, 1.01 to 1.46), 1.24 (95 percent confidenceinterval, 1.03 to 1.49), and 1.18 (95 percent confidence interval,0.98 to 1.40).
Several prospective clinical studies, as well as population-basedstudies, have indicated that the incidence of cardiovascularevents is predicted by blood pressure as measured conventionallyor with ambulatory methods, even after adjustment for a numberof established risk factors.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 In someof these studies, ambulatory measurements of blood pressurepredicted cardiovascular events even after adjustment for conventionalblood-pressure measurements.1,3,5,7,9,12 However, in most ofthese studies, the majority of data on ambulatory blood pressure,which were used to predict end points, were recorded in initiallyuntreated subjects or during a placebo run-in phase; in mostcases, treatment was initiated afterward. There is a lack ofdata on the prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure monitoringin patients with treated hypertension in whom both ambulatorymeasurements of blood pressure and office-based measurementsof blood pressure are recorded when patients are receiving activetreatment a scenario that more closely reflects dailyclinical practice for many patients. An indication that ambulatoryblood-pressure measurements during treatment are superior tooffice blood-pressure measurements in predicting cardiovascularrisk came from a recent post hoc subanalysis involving 790 patientswith treated hypertension.13
We conducted the prospective, multicenter Office versus AmbulatoryBlood Pressure (OvA) study to address whether ambulatory bloodpressure monitored in patients with treated hypertension couldpredict cardiovascular events and death even after adjustmentfor conventional office blood-pressure measurements. To thisend, 1963 patients were prospectively enrolled and followedfor approximately five years.
Methods
Study Design
The study protocol was approved by the institutional reviewboards of the Ghent University Hospital (Ghent, Belgium) andother participating centers. All patients gave written informedconsent. All decisions concerning the study design, the collection,analysis, and interpretation of the data, and the intellectualcontent of the manuscript were made independently by the studycommittees, without the involvement of the pharmaceutical-industrysponsors.
The prerequisite for inclusion was documented hypertension attwo separate visits within a two-year period before enrollment(visits 1 and 2). Hypertension was diagnosed if the mean ofthree sphygmomanometric readings of diastolic blood pressure(assessed as the fifth Korotkoff sound and obtained in the office,when the patient was sitting, after five minutes of rest) exceeded90 mm Hg in a patient who was currently taking antihypertensivemedication or 95 mm Hg in a patient who was not taking suchmedication. In order to be eligible, patients had to have beentreated with antihypertensive drugs for at least three monthsby the time of the inclusion visit (visit 3). Patients of eithersex who were 18 years of age or older were eligible. Criteriafor exclusion included suspicion of secondary hypertension,insulin-treated diabetes mellitus, recent stroke (occurringwithin the previous three months), recent acute myocardial infarction,recent hospitalization for chronic heart failure, recent revascularizationor planned cardiovascular intervention during the succeedingthree months, a serum creatinine concentration of more than2.5 mg per deciliter (220 µmol per liter), chronic obstructivepulmonary disease, any coexisting diseases that might seriouslyreduce life expectancy, heart transplantation, use of experimentaldrugs, pregnancy, and refusal to undergo repeated follow-upvisits and ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring. The choiceof antihypertensive drugs was at the discretion of the physician,and physicians were repeatedly advised to follow current guidelinesand to target a blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg, as measuredin the office while the patient was sitting.
Data Collection
At visit 3, demographic data were recorded, as well as informationabout traditional cardiovascular risk factors, history of cardiovascularevents, and current medications (antiplatelet, antidiabetic,lipid-lowering, and other cardiovascular drugs). Anthropometricdata were collected, and a routine 12-lead electrocardiogramwas obtained. At that time, a sample of venous blood was drawnto assess base-line factors. Immediately after visit 3, ambulatoryblood pressure was recorded over a 24-hour period during thepatient's normal daily activities, with the use of properlyvalidated and calibrated monitors programmed to obtain readingsat intervals of not more than 30 minutes between 8 a.m. and8 p.m. and at intervals of not more than 60 minutes between8 p.m. and 8 a.m. Raw data were sent to the coordinating centerand were visually inspected by a technician before being enteredinto the central data base. No specific editing criteria wereapplied to the blood-pressure readings. We planned to followpatients for up to 5.5 years.
End Points
The end-point committee identified all major end points by reviewingthe patients' files and source documents or by requesting moredetailed written information from the investigators; the committeewas blinded with respect to all blood-pressure data. Cardiovascularevents were validated according to the principles used in theSystolic Hypertension in Europe trial.14 Stroke was definedas a neurologic deficit with symptoms continuing for more than24 hours or leading to death with no apparent cause other thana vascular cause. Acute myocardial infarction was defined bythe presence of two of the following: typical chest pain, electrocardiographicchanges, and increased cardiac-enzyme concentrations. The definitionof myocardial infarction did not include silent myocardial infarction.The definition of congestive heart failure required the presenceof symptoms, clinical signs, and a need for treatment. Suddendeath was defined as any death of unknown cause occurring immediatelyor within 24 hours after the onset of acute symptoms or anyunwitnessed death for which no likely cause could be establishedon the basis of the medical history. Angina pectoris was diagnosedif there was chest pain and documented electrocardiographicsigns of coronary ischemia or if there was a need for coronaryrevascularization in the absence of acute myocardial infarction.Patients recorded as having peripheral (noncoronary) vasculardisease included those who underwent surgical or angioplasticprocedures on the aorta or the arteries of the legs. Transientischemic attacks were excluded from the statistical analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were planned for the primary end pointof fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events and the secondaryend points of fatal or nonfatal acute myocardial infarctionor stroke, death from any cause, and death from cardiovascularcauses. The study variables compared were the office blood pressure(the mean of the sphygmomanometric blood pressure readings atvisit 3, obtained as described above) and the means of the 24-hour,daytime, and nighttime ambulatory measurements of systolic anddiastolic blood pressure (also recorded at visit 3). Daytimeambulatory blood pressure was defined as that between 8 a.m.and 8 p.m., and nighttime ambulatory blood pressure as thatbetween midnight and 6 a.m.15,16,17,18 We initially screened2232 patients, but because of protocol violations (in 10 patients),technical failure (in 41 patients with poor-quality ambulatoryblood-pressure recordings and 6 patients with an insufficientnumber of readings to allow statistical analysis), or inadequateclinical follow-up (in 212 patients), a total of 269 patientshad to be excluded from final analyses, yielding 1963 eligiblepatients (88 percent). In all 1963 patients, office measurementsof blood pressure, ambulatory measurements of blood pressure,and adequate follow-up documentation were available.
The distributions of base-line characteristics in the groupof patients with cardiovascular events and the group withoutcardiovascular events were compared with the use of Fisher'sexact test for proportions and the t-test or the MannWhitneyU test for continuous variables. Cox proportional-hazards modelswere used to estimate relative risks (with 95 percent confidenceintervals) for events associated with a 1-SD increment in bloodpressure, with adjustment for sex, age, body-mass index (theweight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters),smoking status, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, serumcholesterol concentration, use or nonuse of lipid-lowering drugs,and history of cardiovascular events. All statistical analyseswere performed with the use of SAS software, version 6.12 (SASInstitute).
Table 1. Characteristics of the Patients According to Category of Ambulatory Blood Pressure.
Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressures as Predictors of Risk
Cox proportional-hazards analysis for each outcome variablewas performed with the use of fixed clock-time definitions ofboth daytime and nighttime ambulatory blood pressure. Table 2shows the relative risks (and 95 percent confidence intervals)associated with a 1-SD increment in blood pressure after adjustmentfor sex, age, body-mass index, smoking status, presence or absenceof diabetes mellitus, serum cholesterol concentration, use ornonuse of lipid-lowering drugs, and presence or absence of ahistory of cardiovascular events. Both office and ambulatorymeasurements of systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantlypredicted the primary end point of fatal or nonfatal cardiovascularevents. Table 3 summarizes the relative risks associated witheach 1-SD increment in ambulatory measurements of systolic anddiastolic blood pressure after additional adjustment for officeblood pressure. For the primary end point, 24-hour and daytimeambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure predicted outcomeeven after adjustment for office blood pressure. The mean 24-hourblood-pressure measurements at base line for patients who hada cardiovascular event and those who did not are shown in Figure 1.Results were similar for the end point of fatal or nonfatalmyocardial infarction or stroke (Table 3).
Figure 1. Hourly Means of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Derived from 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Recordings Obtained at Base Line (Visit 3) in the 1963 Participants.
We also examined separately the cerebrovascular and coronaryoutcomes (although this was not a prespecified aim, and thenumbers were small). Systolic blood pressure as measured inthe office independently predicted the risk of cerebrovascularevents (36 patients had such an event; relative risk associatedwith a 1-SD increment in office systolic blood pressure, 1.50[95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 2.08]), and ambulatoryblood pressure was not predictive of the risk of cerebrovascularevents after adjustment for office blood pressure. However,24-hour and daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure predictedthe risk of coronary events (which occurred in 42 patients)even after adjustment for office blood pressure (relative riskassociated with a 1-SD increment in ambulatory systolic bloodpressure, 1.63 [95 percent confidence interval, 1.10 to 2.42]and 1.68 [95 percent confidence interval, 1.14 to 2.48], respectively).None of the ambulatory blood-pressure variables predicted therisk of death from any cause (Table 2 and Table 3) or deathfrom cardiovascular causes (which occurred in 38 patients; datanot shown).
As compared with patients with a mean 24-hour systolic bloodpressure of less than 135 mm Hg, patients with a 24-hour ambulatorysystolic blood pressure of 135 mm Hg or higher had a relativerisk of cardiovascular events, with adjustment for office bloodpressure and other potential confounders, of 1.74 (95 percentconfidence interval, 1.15 to 2.63). Figure 2 further illustratesthe higher incidence of cardiovascular events with higher ambulatoryblood-pressure measurements among patients in each of threecategories of office systolic blood pressure (<140 mm Hg,140 to 159 mm Hg, and ≥160 mm Hg).
Figure 2. Incidence of Cardiovascular Events According to Category of Office Systolic Blood Pressure.
All blood-pressure values were obtained at the inclusion visit. Among patients in all three categories of office systolic blood pressure, a 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure of 135 mm Hg or higher predicted a higher incidence of cardiovascular events than a 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure of less than 135 mm Hg. The unadjusted relative risk of a cardiovascular event associated with a 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure of 135 mm Hg or higher as compared with a 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure of less than 135 mm Hg was 3.19 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.34 to 7.59) among patients with an office systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg, 2.09 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.19 to 3.66) among patients with an office systolic blood pressure of 140 to 159 mm Hg, and 2.21 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.33 to 3.68) among patients with an office systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or higher. After adjustment for sex, age, body-mass index, smoking status, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, serum cholesterol concentration, use or nonuse of lipid-lowering drugs, and presence or absence of cardiovascular complications at entry, the corresponding relative risks were 2.80 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.80 to 9.85), 1.82 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 3.56), and 2.31 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.26 to 4.22). Numbers above the bars are the number of patients in the specific subgroup with a cardiovascular event over the total number of patients in that subgroup.
The results of our large-scale prospective study demonstratethat, after adjustment for classic risk factors including officeblood pressure, the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure providedadditional prognostic information concerning cardiovascularevents, including a combined outcome of nonfatal or fatal myocardialinfarction or stroke. However, this measure did not predictthe risk of death from any cause.
The findings of our study, in which all ambulatory measurementsof blood pressure were obtained in treated patients, are consistentwith those of previously published outcome studies,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11in which ambulatory blood-pressure measurements were obtainedin untreated or placebo-treated subjects at the time of inclusionin the study.
In the substudy of the Systolic Hypertension in Europe trialaddressing ambulatory blood pressure,9 about 800 patients underwentambulatory blood-pressure monitoring during the placebo run-inperiod before undergoing randomization to placebo or activetreatment. In the placebo group, ambulatory systolic blood pressurepredicted cardiovascular complications after cumulative adjustmentsfor age, sex, smoking status, presence or absence of previouscardiovascular complications, residence or nonresidence in westernEurope, and conventional blood-pressure measurements. The participantsin that study were elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension,and in contrast to our study, that study showed that ambulatoryblood pressure did not predict the outcome in the active-treatmentgroup.
Earlier data based on semiautomatic ambulatory blood-pressuremonitoring demonstrated the potential value of ambulatory bloodpressure in discriminating between hypertensive patients athigh cardiovascular risk and those at lower risk; these datashowed that such discrimination was possible on the basis ofthe variance in the daytime ambulatory blood pressure, whichwas not explained by readings obtained in the clinic.1,12 Inthat study, for technical reasons, no nighttime monitoring wasperformed, which resulted in incomplete documentation of the24-hour profile.
Among referred patients with hypertension included in the ProgettoIpertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale prospective registry,the base-line ambulatory blood pressure measured before treatmentbegan was an independent predictor of the risk of cardiovascularevents.8,19,20 In that study, the authors focused on the increasedrisk associated with a blunted nocturnal decrease in blood pressurebut did not directly compare office blood pressure measuredin treated patients with ambulatory blood pressure. A post hocsubgroup analysis suggested an association between the ambulatoryblood pressure in patients whose blood pressure was adequatelycontrolled by treatment and a reduced risk of cardiovascularevents that was independent of other traditional risk factors.13Office blood-pressure values in treated patients were not significantlyrelated to cardiovascular risk. However, the design of thatstudy differed substantially from our protocol. The authorsrecorded 24-hour blood pressure with ambulatory monitoring intreated patients an average of 3.7 years after their enrollmentin the registry and did not study fatal events.
In a large sample of a Japanese community comprising both treatedand untreated subjects, ambulatory blood pressure also predictedthe risk of fatal cardiovascular events, even after adjustmentfor age, sex, risk factors, medication, cardiovascular history,and conventional blood pressure.3,21,22 In a study of 688 patientswith hypertension followed for more than nine years, the ambulatoryintraarterial blood pressure recorded before treatment beganwas predictive of cardiovascular risk. In our study, a noninvasiveapproach to ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure was used.
The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure has also beenassessed in a small study of patients with treatment-refractoryhypertension.5 Higher values for ambulatory blood pressure moreaccurately predicted future cardiovascular events than did clinic-basedmeasurements of blood pressure. The mean blood pressure amongpatients in that study was considerably higher than the meanpressure in our study. In general, the patients we studied couldnot be considered to have true refractory hypertension, althoughit is possible that a small proportion of our patients presentedwith drug-resistant hypertension.
Some limitations of our study should be noted. We did not havethe necessary information to adjust adequately for a familyhistory of coronary artery disease, urinary albumin excretion,levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or high-densitylipoprotein cholesterol, levels of physical activity, or dietarymeasures. Thus, we could not account for the effect of thesevariables on cardiovascular outcomes.
The results of our study clearly demonstrate the limitationsof office readings as they are routinely obtained. In our study,three blood-pressure readings from a single office visit wereaveraged for use as a measure of office blood pressure. By contrast,in the Systolic Hypertension in Europe study, conventional bloodpressure was calculated on the basis of six readings (two readingsfrom each of three visits).9,14 Fagard et al.23 demonstratedthat the correlations between left ventricular mass and clinicblood pressure and between left ventricular mass and ambulatoryblood pressure became much closer when clinic readings werebetter standardized and when the readings were averaged overmore than one visit. That study suggests that for direct comparisonsbetween conventional and ambulatory measurements of blood pressure,it is best to use repeated, standardized conventional readingsobtained at prespecified intervals. The use of protocols thatare not well standardized in the assessment of the office bloodpressure may lead to a high degree of variance in this measure,particularly among treated patients such as those in our study.
Another weakness of routine blood-pressure measurement thatmay have influenced our results is that the effects of drugs(e.g., peak and trough effects) may have had a greater influenceon the variance in office readings than on that in 24-hour ambulatoryreadings. Our study was not designed to address the effectsof individual drugs or classes of drugs; therefore, patientswere allowed to take all classes of drugs, which were administeredat the discretion of their physicians.
Supported by the Flemish Science Foundation (Fonds voor WetenschappelijkOnderzoek-Vlaanderen), the University of Ghent, the UniversityHospital of Ghent, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche,Pfizer, Servier-Eutherapie Benelux, the Rotary Club Ghent, andthe Stichting Gezondheidszorg Nollet.
We are indebted to Mrs. Linda Packet for her help in administeringthe study and her help in the preparation of the manuscript,and to Mrs. Gerda Bollaert and Mrs. Marleen Van Hecke for theirlogistic help during the study.
* The Office versus Ambulatory Blood Pressure (OvA) Study Investigatorsare listed in the Appendix.
Source Information
From the Departments of Cardiovascular Diseases (D.L.C., M.L.D.B., D.A.D., P.J.G.) and Public Health (D.A.D.B.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; the Department of Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands (P.W.L.); the Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (D.A.D.); the Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (R.H.F.); the Department of Cardiology, Algemeen Ziekenhuis St. Jan, Bruges, Belgium (L.H.M.); the Department of Internal Medicine, Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, the Netherlands (J.J.B.); the Department of Internal Medicine and Hypertension, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium (R.O.S., P.V.D.N.); and the Blood Pressure Unit and Arterial Disease, Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (E.O.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Clement at the Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium, or at denis.clement{at}skynet.be.
References
Perloff D, Sokolow M, Cowan R. The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure. JAMA 1983;249:2792-2798. [Free Full Text]
Zweiker R, Eber B, Schumacher M, Toplak H, Klein W. "Non-dipping" related to cardiovascular events in essential hypertensive patients. Acta Med Austriaca 1994;21:86-89. [Web of Science][Medline]
Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, et al. Prediction of mortality by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus screening blood pressure measurements: a pilot study in Ohasama. J Hypertens 1997;15:357-364. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nakano S, Fukuda M, Hotta F, et al. Reversed circadian blood pressure rhythm is associated with occurrence of both fatal and nonfatal vascular events in NIDDM subjects. Diabetes 1998;47:1501-1506. [Free Full Text]
Redon J, Campos C, Narciso ML, Rodicio JL, Pascual JM, Ruilope LM. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in refractory hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension 1998;31:712-718. [Free Full Text]
Yamamoto Y, Akiguchi I, Oiwa K, Hayashi M, Kimura J. Adverse effect of nighttime blood pressure on the outcome of lacunar infarct patients. Stroke 1998;29:570-576. [Free Full Text]
Khattar RS, Swales JD, Banfield A, Dore C, Senior R, Lahiri A. Prediction of coronary and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality by direct continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in essential hypertension. Circulation 1999;100:1071-1076. [Erratum, Circulation 1999;100:1760.] [Free Full Text]
Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Pede S, Porcellati C. Ambulatory pulse pressure: a potent predictor of total cardiovascular risk in hypertension. Hypertension 1998;32:983-988. [Free Full Text]
Staessen JA, Thijs L, Fagard R, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. JAMA 1999;282:539-546. [Free Full Text]
Sander D, Kukla C, Klingelhöfer J, Winbeck K, Conrad B. Relationship between circadian blood pressure patterns and progression of early carotid atherosclerosis: a 3-year follow-up study. Circulation 2000;102:1536-1541. [Free Full Text]
Kario K, Pickering TG, Matsuo T, Hoshide S, Schwartz JE, Shimada K. Stroke prognosis and abnormal nocturnal blood pressure falls in older hypertensives. Hypertension 2001;38:852-857. [Free Full Text]
Perloff D, Sokolow M, Cowan RM, Juster RP. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure measurements: further analyses. J Hypertens Suppl 1989;7:S3-S10. [CrossRef][Medline]
Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Porcellati C, et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease in relation to achieved office and ambulatory blood pressure control in treated hypertensive subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:878-885. [Free Full Text]
Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet 1997;350:757-764. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fagard R, Brguljan J, Thijs L, Staessen J. Prediction of the actual awake and asleep blood pressures by various methods of 24-h pressure analysis. J Hypertens 1996;14:557-563. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Pickering TG. How should the diurnal changes of blood pressure be expressed? Am J Hypertens 1995;8:681-682. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
O'Brien E, Sheridan J, O'Malley K. Dippers and non-dippers. Lancet 1988;2:397-397. [Medline]
Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Gattobigio R, Porcellati C. Nocturnal pressure is the true pressure. Blood Press Monit 1996;1:Suppl 2:S81-S85.
Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Gatteschi C, et al. Blunted nocturnal fall in blood pressure in hypertensive women with future cardiovascular morbid events. Circulation 1993;88:986-992. [Free Full Text]
Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Schillaci G, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure: an independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension. Hypertension 1994;24:793-801. [Erratum, Hypertension 1995;25:462.] [Free Full Text]
Ohkubo T, Hozawa A, Yamaguchi J, et al. Prognostic significance of the nocturnal decline in blood pressure in individuals with and without high 24-h blood pressure: the Ohasama study. J Hypertens 2002;20:2183-2189. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, et al. Reference values for 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring based on a prognostic criterion: the Ohasama Study. Hypertension 1998;32:255-259. [Free Full Text]
Fagard RH, Staessen JA, Thijs L. Prediction of cardiac structure and function by repeated clinic and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension 1997;29:22-29. [Free Full Text]
De Henauw S, De Bacquer D, Fonteyne W, Stam M, Kornitzer M, De Backer G. Trends in the prevalence, detection, treatment and control of arterial hypertension in the Belgian adult population. J Hypertens 1998;16:277-284. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mancia G, Bombelli M, Lanzarotti A, et al. Systolic vs diastolic blood pressure control in the hypertensive patients of the PAMELA population. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:582-586. [Free Full Text]
Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Buntinx F, Celis H, O'Brien ET, Fagard R. Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 1997;278:1065-1072. [Free Full Text]
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC7 Report. JAMA 2003;289:2560-2572. [Free Full Text]
Appendix
The Office versus Ambulatory Blood Pressure (OvA) study wasconducted under the auspices of the European Society of Hypertension,the European Society of Cardiology, and the Belgian HypertensionCommittee. The following investigators were responsible forthe coordination of the participating clinicians (an asteriskdenotes deceased): Trial coordinator D. Clement; Nationalcoordinators L. Caparovski* (Republic of Macedonia),M. Carrageta (Portugal), R. Cifkova (Czech Republic), J.P. Degaute(Belgium), P. de Leeuw (the Netherlands), M. Lapinski (Poland),J.M. Mallion (France), E. O'Brien (Ireland), P. Palatini (Italy),J.L. Rodicio (Spain); Coordinators of Belgian general practices J. Beys, K. Bruyneel, M. Bury, D. De Clercq, D. Defrance,J. Deheneffe, Y. Deheneffe, P. De Jaegher, A. Friart, L. Geutjens,M. Gysbrechts, A. Herman, M. Kahan, A. Kassab, L. Labaki, P.Lafontaine, J. Lalmand, H. Lesseliers, D. Mertens, E. Mievis,E. Robbens, R. Six, C. Stevens, Y. Streulens, J. Thoeng, P.Timmermans, P. Van Der Niepen, A. Van Dorpe, E. Van Houwe, P.Van Iseghem, P. Vermeersch; Protocol Committee D.L.Clement, A. Coats, J. Conway,* G. Mancia, E. O'Brien; End-PointCommittee P. de Leeuw, R. Fagard (chairs), D. Duprezand P. Gheeraert (associate members); Publication Committee D.L. Clement, M. De Buyzere, P. de Leeuw, R. Fagard,E. O'Brien; Data Monitoring Committee D. De Bacquer(statistical analysis), M. De Buyzere, L. Missault, L. Packet;Ethics Committee W. Birkenhäger, M. Bogaert, A.Zanchetti.
In addition, the following investigators participated in thestudy: University Hospital Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven,Belgium R. Fagard, J. Staessen; St. Jozefziekenhuis,Turnhout, Belgium I. Bekaert; Centre Hospitalier UniversitaireTivoli, La Louviere, Belgium P. Dupont; University Hospital,Ghent, Belgium D. Duprez; Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen,Antwerp, Belgium J. Denekens, F. Rademakers; AlgemeenZiekenhuis Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium R. Lins; HôpitalSaint Luc, Brussels, Belgium J.F. De Plaen; Privatecardiologists and general practitioners, Belgium H.Antonneau, L. Arcache, D. Barina, S. Bartholomeeusen, M. Barvais,I. Bayon, A. Bellucci, L. Berghmans, A. Berghs, A. Bernard,K. Bertels, G. Binet, L. Bleyen, J. Bogaert, F. Bolly, L. Bonami,D. Bonhomme, M. Bonhomme, A. Boogaerts, H. Boufessile, J. Boxus,B. Brichard, L. Bril, M. Brinker, C. Busellato, J. Busschaert,J. Cambier, P. Capiau, A. Carlier, J. Caudelier, P. Cayman,H. Cerfontaine, P. Ceurvelts, P. Chapelle, G. Charlier, G. Clerinx,E. Cloot-Snyders, S. Coene, A. Collin, D. Content, M. Content,M. Coopmans, P. Cornelis, J.M. Crespeigne, M.J. Cuvelier, G.De Bilderling, R. De Bruyn, J.P. De Corte, W. De Geyseleer,F. De Greef, F. De Greve, R. De Jongh, M. De Kimpe, A. De Leeuw,L. De Lille, B. De Man, D. De Munck, J. De Pourcq, H. De Ridder,M. De Roeck, M. De Ruyttere, H. De Schryver, A. De Vlieger,L. De Voecht, J. De Vos, J. Dewachter, H. De Wit, P. De Witte,A. Decerf, J. Declerck, E. Deconinck, I. Deeren, F. Dejaegher,A. Delhauteur, D. Delsate, R. Demets, J. Dens, M. Derycke, M.Deschamps, P. Descheemaeker, G. D'Hanis, P. D'Hanis, M. D'Hollander,W. D'Hooge, P. Dieleman, R. Diels, D. Di Mattia, G. Economou,A. Elouehabi, M. Elsen, E. Ercken, F. Evrard, P. Fabry, L. Fellah,L. Ferrant, A.C. Feye, D. Flahou, R. Follet, I. Geenen, R. Gevaert,L. Gielen, L. Gillemon, F. Goethals, K. Goethals, J.C. Goffin,V. Goossens, D. Grand, G. Gras, A. Grimee, J. Grosjean, R. Haardt,I. Haumont, J. Hellebaut, K. Hendrickx, W. Hendrickx, W. Hens,C. Ho Van, M. Hubert, L. Ieven, A. Jadin, P. Jaspers, M. Joly,A. Jorion, B. Jortay, P. Joskin, G. Jouret, P. Kerckhoven, L.Kestens, E. Keutgen, G. Lambrechts, H. Lammers, P. Laskar, A.Lecocq, C. Ledoux, J. Ledune, P. Leemans, A. Lefebvre, C. Lefebvre,P. Lenaerts, D. Lesage, R. Lietaer, L. Louette, J. Luyts, R.Maes, M. Maex, S. Manceaux-Thirion, G. Marco, J. Marquet-Lochegnies,R. Martens, J. Masureel, F. Maudens, P. Maudens, J.P. Meurant,E. Meys, A. Migeotte, A. Mignot, M. Minnart, J. Moerman, J.P.Monette, A. Monoyer, A. Moonen, Y. Moons, A. Moreels, J.F. Mouvet,N. Neiman, J. Neven, F. Nollomont, J. Nuyten, W. Onsea, M. Pareit,E. Peeters, G. Peeters, L. Peremans, J.L. Perilleux, L. Phang,D. Plessers, M. Poot, D. Quertinier, J.P. Ralet, M. Rase, J.C.Reichling, R. Remmen, P. Robert, J.P. Rochet, F. Roelandts,M. Roland, J.Y. Rousseau, M. Saey, F. Sas, D. Scheveneels, L.Schillemans, E. Schreurs, B. Seront, J. Sette, M. Simons, P.Simons, P. Sisani, J. Smekens, J.F. Soupart, J.F. Spiertz, A.Spilsteyns, F. Spirlet, J. Sprenghers, J. Staelens, D. Strens,H. Stuer, C. Swinne, D. Taes, M. Talloen, M. Temmerman, P. Thibaut,D. Thiry, H.T. Tran, T. Tran Duy, Y. Urbain, P. Van Berkel,L. Van Boxelaer, J. Van Brabant, B. Van Damme, I. Van De Velde,A. Van De Weyer, F. Van Den Broek, G. Van Den Bussche, L. VanDen Eeckhout, W. Van Den Eede, B. Van den Eynden, H. Van DerVeken, W. Van Dievel, W. Van Doninck, S. Van Enis, L. Van Eupen,C. Van Haren, L. Van Heyste, L. Van Hoecke, G. Vankerckhoven,F. Van Lint, J. Van Lint,* J. Van Maele, E. Van Maerken, A.J.Van Oostveldt, C. Van Parijs, W. Van Peer, P. Van Royen, P.Van Severen, D. Van Troyen, P. Van Vlaenderen, L. Vanneste,G. Vereecken, A. Verheyen, V. Verstreken, J.P. Vervaeke, M.Vervaeke, M. Vrijdag, R. Vroonen, L. Vuylsteke, M. Vydt, C.Weber, A. Wery, S. Weyens, J. Willaert, L. Willaert, J.J. Zeiger;Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, CzechRepublic R. Cifkova; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire,Grenoble, France S. Boutelant, J.M. Mallion; HôpitalUniversitaire La Miletrie, Poitiers, France D. Herpin;Charitable Infirmary, Dublin, Ireland E. Breslin, C.Gavin, E. O'Brien; Ospedale San Giovanni Di Dio, Florence, Italy R. Laureano; Clinica Medica, Pavia, Italy E.Marchesi; Ospedale Civile, San Daniele, Italy L. Mos;Universita degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy S.Novo; Clinica Medica, Padua, Italy P. Palatini; GeneralHospital Silvestrini, Perugia, Italy C. Porcellati,P. Verdecchia; Academy of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland M.Lapinski, J. Lewandowski; Hospital Universitade de Coimbra,Coimbra, Portugal G. Pego; Instituto de CardiologiaPreventiva, Almada, Portugal M. Carrageta; Hospitalde la Santa Creu, Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain A. RocaCusachs; Hospital 12 Octubre, Madrid J.L. Rodicio; UniversityHospital, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia L. Caparovski,*N. Gjorgov; Vlietland Ziekenhuis, Schiedam, the Netherlands J.J. Braun; Ikaziaziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands A. Dees; and Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Maastricht,the Netherlands P. de Leeuw.
RAFEY, M.
(2009). Beyond office sphygmomanometry: Ways to better assess blood pressure. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
76: 657-662
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fagard, R. H.
(2009). Smoking Amplifies Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes. Diabetes Care
32: S429-S431
[Full Text]
Messerli, F. H., Makani, H.
(2009). Relentless Progression Toward Sustained Hypertension. Hypertension
54: 217-218
[Full Text]
Parati, G., Omboni, S., Bilo, G.
(2009). Why Is Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement Needed?: Home Blood Pressure Measurements Will Increasingly Replace Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension. Hypertension
54: 181-187
[Full Text]
Verdecchia, P., Angeli, F., Mazzotta, G., Gentile, G., Reboldi, G.
(2009). Home Blood Pressure Measurements Will Not Replace 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. Hypertension
54: 188-195
[Full Text]
Thomopoulos, C., Papadopoulos, D. P., Papazachou, O., Bratsas, A., Massias, S., Anastasiadis, G., Perrea, D., Makris, T.
(2009). Free Leptin Is Associated With Masked Hypertension in Nonobese Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study. Hypertension
53: 965-972
[Abstract][Full Text]
Muxfeldt, E. S., Cardoso, C. R. L., Salles, G. F.
(2009). Prognostic Value of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Reduction in Resistant Hypertension. Arch Intern Med
169: 874-880
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rinfret, S., Lussier, M.-T., Peirce, A., Duhamel, F., Cossette, S., Lalonde, L., Tremblay, C., Guertin, M.-C., LeLorier, J., Turgeon, J., Hamet, P., for the LOYAL Study Investigators,
(2009). The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Information Technology-Supported Program on Blood Pressure Control in Primary Care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
2: 170-177
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bangash, F., Agarwal, R.
(2009). Masked Hypertension and White-Coat Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-analysis. CJASN
4: 656-664
[Abstract][Full Text]
de la Sierra, A., Redon, J., Banegas, J. R., Segura, J., Parati, G., Gorostidi, M., de la Cruz, J. J., Sobrino, J., Llisterri, J. L., Alonso, J., Vinyoles, E., Pallares, V., Sarria, A., Aranda, P., Ruilope, L. M., on behalf of the Spanish Society of Hypertension A,
(2009). Prevalence and Factors Associated With Circadian Blood Pressure Patterns in Hypertensive Patients. Hypertension
53: 466-472
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fernandez, J.R, Hermida, R.C, Mojon, A
(2009). Chronobiological analysis techniques. Application to blood pressure. Phil Trans R Soc A
367: 431-445
[Abstract][Full Text]
Salles, G. F., Cardoso, C. R. L., Muxfeldt, E. S.
(2008). Prognostic Influence of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressures in Resistant Hypertension. Arch Intern Med
168: 2340-2346
[Abstract][Full Text]
Agarwal, R., Light, R. P.
(2008). Physical Activity and Hemodynamic Reactivity in Chronic Kidney Disease. CJASN
3: 1660-1668
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ishikawa, J., Carroll, D. J., Kuruvilla, S., Schwartz, J. E., Pickering, T. G.
(2008). Changes in Home Versus Clinic Blood Pressure With Antihypertensive Treatments: A Meta-Analysis. Hypertension
52: 856-864
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bankir, L., Bochud, M., Maillard, M., Bovet, P., Gabriel, A., Burnier, M.
(2008). Nighttime Blood Pressure and Nocturnal Dipping Are Associated With Daytime Urinary Sodium Excretion in African Subjects. Hypertension
51: 891-898
[Abstract][Full Text]
Aggoun, Y., Farpour-Lambert, N. J., Marchand, L. M., Golay, E., Maggio, A. B.R., Beghetti, M.
(2008). Impaired endothelial and smooth muscle functions and arterial stiffness appear before puberty in obese children and are associated with elevated ambulatory blood pressure. Eur Heart J
29: 792-799
[Abstract][Full Text]
Greiver, M.
(2008). Improving hypertension management in my practice. cfp
54: 358-359
[Full Text]
Chavanu, K., Merkel, J., Quan, A. M.
(2008). Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension. Am J Health Syst Pharm
65: 209-218
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rodriguez, C. J., Burg, M. M., Meng, J., Pickering, T. G., Jin, Z., Sacco, R. L., Boden-Albala, B., Homma, S., Di Tullio, M. R.
(2008). Effect of Social Support on Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping. Psychosom. Med.
70: 7-12
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fagard, R. H., Celis, H., Thijs, L., Staessen, J. A., Clement, D. L., De Buyzere, M. L., De Bacquer, D. A.
(2008). Daytime and Nighttime Blood Pressure as Predictors of Death and Cause-Specific Cardiovascular Events in Hypertension. Hypertension
51: 55-61
[Abstract][Full Text]
Authors/Task Force Members, , Graham, I., Atar, D., Borch-Johnsen, K., Boysen, G., Burell, G., Cifkova, R., Dallongeville, J., De Backer, G., Ebrahim, S., Gjelsvik, B., Herrmann-Lingen, C., Hoes, A., Humphries, S., Knapton, M., Perk, J., Priori, S. G., Pyorala, K., Reiner, Z., Ruilope, L., Sans-Menendez, S., Scholte op Reimer, W., Weissberg, P., Wood, D., Yarnell, J., Zamorano, J. L., Other experts who contributed to parts of the guid, , Walma, E., Fitzgerald, T., Cooney, M. T., Dudina, A., European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Committee for, , Vahanian, A., Camm, J., De Caterina, R., Dean, V., Dickstein, K., Funck-Brentano, C., Filippatos, G., Hellemans, I., Kristensen, S. D., McGregor, K., Sechtem, U., Silber, S., Tendera, M., Widimsky, P., Zamorano, J. L., Document reviewers:, , Hellemans, I., Altiner, A., Bonora, E., Durrington, P. N., Fagard, R., Giampaoli, S., Hemingway, H., Hakansson, J., Kjeldsen, S. E., Larsen, M. L., Mancia, G., Manolis, A. J., Orth-Gomer, K., Pedersen, T., Rayner, M., Ryden, L., Sammut, M., Schneiderman, N., Stalenhoef, A. F., Tokgozoglu, L., Wiklund, O., Zampelas, A.
(2007). European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J
28: 2375-2414
[Full Text]
Ommen, E. S., Schroppel, B., Kim, J.-Y., Gaspard, G., Akalin, E., de Boccardo, G., Sehgal, V., Lipkowitz, M., Murphy, B.
(2007). Routine Use of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Potential Living Kidney Donors. CJASN
2: 1030-1036
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tatasciore, A., Renda, G., Zimarino, M., Soccio, M., Bilo, G., Parati, G., Schillaci, G., De Caterina, R.
(2007). Awake Systolic Blood Pressure Variability Correlates With Target-Organ Damage in Hypertensive Subjects. Hypertension
50: 325-332
[Abstract][Full Text]
Authors/Task Force Members:, , Mancia, G., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., Cifkova, R., Fagard, R., Germano, G., Grassi, G., Heagerty, A. M., Kjeldsen, S. E., Laurent, S., Narkiewicz, K., Ruilope, L., Rynkiewicz, A., Schmieder, R. E., Struijker Boudier, H. A.J., Zanchetti, A., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG):, , Vahanian, A., Camm, J., De Caterina, R., Dean, V., Dickstein, K., Filippatos, G., Funck-Brentano, C., Hellemans, I., Kristensen, S. D., McGregor, K., Sechtem, U., Silber, S., Tendera, M., Widimsky, P., Zamorano, J. L., ESH Scientific Council:, , Kjeldsen, S. E., Erdine, S., Narkiewicz, K., Kiowski, W., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Ambrosioni, E., Cifkova, R., Dominiczak, A., Fagard, R., Heagerty, A. M., Laurent, S., Lindholm, L. H., Mancia, G., Manolis, A., Nilsson, P. M., Redon, J., Schmieder, R. E., Struijker-Boudier, H. A.J., Viigimaa, M., Document Reviewers:, , Filippatos, G., Adamopoulos, S., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Ambrosioni, E., Bertomeu, V., Clement, D., Erdine, S., Farsang, C., Gaita, D., Kiowski, W., Lip, G., Mallion, J.-M., Manolis, A. J., Nilsson, P. M., O'Brien, E., Ponikowski, P., Redon, J., Ruschitzka, F., Tamargo, J., van Zwieten, P., Viigimaa, M., Waeber, B., Williams, B., Zamorano, J. L.
(2007). 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J
0: ehm236v1-75
[Full Text]
Ben-Dov, I. Z., Kark, J. D., Ben-Ishay, D., Mekler, J., Ben-Arie, L., Bursztyn, M.
(2007). Predictors of All-Cause Mortality in Clinical Ambulatory Monitoring: Unique Aspects of Blood Pressure During Sleep. Hypertension
49: 1235-1241
[Abstract][Full Text]
Clement, D. L.
(2007). Night and Day: What Blood Pressure Matters?. Hypertension
49: 1213-1214
[Full Text]
Schwartz, G. L., Bailey, K. R., Mosley, T., Knopman, D. S., Jack, C. R. Jr, Canzanello, V. J., Turner, S. T.
(2007). Association of Ambulatory Blood Pressure With Ischemic Brain Injury. Hypertension
49: 1228-1234
[Abstract][Full Text]
Leitao, C. B., Canani, L. H., Kramer, C. K., Boza, J. C., Pinotti, A. F., Gross, J. L.
(2007). Masked Hypertension, Urinary Albumin Excretion Rate, and Echocardiographic Parameters in Putatively Normotensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Diabetes Care
30: 1255-1260
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wadei, H. M., Amer, H., Taler, S. J., Cosio, F. G., Griffin, M. D., Grande, J. P., Larson, T. S., Schwab, T. R., Stegall, M. D., Textor, S. C.
(2007). Diurnal Blood Pressure Changes One Year after Kidney Transplantation: Relationship to Allograft Function, Histology, and Resistive Index. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
18: 1607-1615
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kato, T., Horio, T., Tomiyama, M., Kamide, K., Nakamura, S., Yoshihara, F., Nakata, H., Nakahama, H., Kawano, Y.
(2007). Reverse white-coat effect as an independent risk for microalbuminuria in treated hypertensive patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant
22: 911-916
[Abstract][Full Text]
Madin, K, Iqbal, P
(2006). Twenty four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a new tool for determining cardiovascular prognosis.. Postgrad. Med. J.
82: 548-551
[Abstract][Full Text]
Salles, G., Cardoso, C., Nogueira, A. R., Bloch, K., Muxfeldt, E.
(2006). Importance of the Electrocardiographic Strain Pattern in Patients With Resistant Hypertension. Hypertension
48: 437-442
[Abstract][Full Text]
Palmas, W., Moran, A., Pickering, T., Eimicke, J. P., Teresi, J., Schwartz, J. E., Field, L., Weinstock, R. S., Shea, S.
(2006). Ambulatory Pulse Pressure and Progression of Urinary Albumin Excretion in Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Hypertension
48: 301-308
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jacobsen, P. K., Rossing, P., Parving, H.-H.
(2006). Impact of renin angiotensin system blockade on night to day blood pressure ratio in diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant
21: 2030-2031
[Full Text]
Ingelsson, E., Bjorklund-Bodegard, K., Lind, L., Arnlov, J., Sundstrom, J.
(2006). Diurnal blood pressure pattern and risk of congestive heart failure.. JAMA
295: 2859-2866
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pickering, T. G., Shimbo, D., Haas, D.
(2006). Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring.. NEJM
354: 2368-2374
[Full Text]
Agarwal, R., Peixoto, A. J., Santos, S. F.F., Zoccali, C.
(2006). Pre- and Postdialysis Blood Pressures Are Imprecise Estimates of Interdialytic Ambulatory Blood Pressure. CJASN
1: 389-398
[Abstract][Full Text]
Moran, A., Palmas, W., Pickering, T. G., Schwartz, J. E., Field, L., Weinstock, R. S., Shea, S.
(2006). Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Are Independently Associated With Albuminuria in Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes. Hypertension
47: 955-961
[Abstract][Full Text]
Stavro, P. M., Woo, M., Leiter, L. A., Heim, T. F., Sievenpiper, J. L., Vuksan, V.
(2006). Long-Term Intake of North American Ginseng Has No Effect on 24-Hour Blood Pressure and Renal Function. Hypertension
47: 791-796
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ernst, M. E., Carter, B. L., Goerdt, C. J., Steffensmeier, J. J.G., Phillips, B. B., Zimmerman, M. B., Bergus, G. R.
(2006). Comparative Antihypertensive Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone on Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressure. Hypertension
47: 352-358
[Abstract][Full Text]
Krakoff, L. R.
(2006). Cost-Effectiveness of Ambulatory Blood Pressure: A Reanalysis. Hypertension
47: 29-34
[Abstract][Full Text]
Messerli, F. H., Cotiga, D.
(2005). Masked Hypertension and White-Coat Hypertension: Therapeutic Navigation Between Scylla and Charybdis. J Am Coll Cardiol
46: 516-517
[Full Text]
Grassi, D., Necozione, S., Lippi, C., Croce, G., Valeri, L., Pasqualetti, P., Desideri, G., Blumberg, J. B., Ferri, C.
(2005). Cocoa Reduces Blood Pressure and Insulin Resistance and Improves Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Hypertensives. Hypertension
46: 398-405
[Abstract][Full Text]
Leitao, C. B., Canani, L. H., Bolson, P. B., Molon, M. P., Pinotti, A. F., Gross, J. L.
(2005). Urinary Albumin Excretion Rate Is Associated With Increased Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Normoalbuminuric Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Diabetes Care
28: 1724-1729
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bursztyn, M.
(2005). Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement: A New Era. Hypertension
45: 1070-1071
[Full Text]
Sega, R., Facchetti, R., Bombelli, M., Cesana, G., Corrao, G., Grassi, G., Mancia, G.
(2005). Prognostic Value of Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressures Compared With Office Blood Pressure in the General Population: Follow-Up Results From the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) Study. Circulation
111: 1777-1783
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hansen, T. W., Jeppesen, J., Rasmussen, S., Ibsen, H., Torp-Pedersen, C.
(2005). Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Mortality: A Population-Based Study. Hypertension
45: 499-504
[Abstract][Full Text]
Myers, M. G.
(2005). Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring for Routine Clinical Practice. Hypertension
45: 483-484
[Full Text]
Goyal, D., Macfadyen, R. J., Watson, R. D., Lip, G. Y.H.
(2005). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in heart failure: a systematic review. Eur J Heart Fail
7: 149-156
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bochud, M., Bovet, P., Elston, R. C., Paccaud, F., Falconnet, C., Maillard, M., Shamlaye, C., Burnier, M.
(2005). High Heritability of Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Families of East African Descent. Hypertension
45: 445-450
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, M. N., Jones, D. W., Kurtz, T., Sheps, S. G., Roccella, E. J.
(2005). Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation
111: 697-716
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kikuya, M., Ohkubo, T., Asayama, K., Metoki, H., Obara, T., Saito, S., Hashimoto, J., Totsune, K., Hoshi, H., Satoh, H., Imai, Y.
(2005). Ambulatory Blood Pressure and 10-Year Risk of Cardiovascular and Noncardiovascular Mortality: The Ohasama Study. Hypertension
45: 240-245
[Abstract][Full Text]
Verdecchia, P., Reboldi, G. P., Angeli, F., Schillaci, G., Schwartz, J. E., Pickering, T. G., Imai, Y., Ohkubo, T., Kario, K.
(2005). Short- and Long-Term Incidence of Stroke in White-Coat Hypertension. Hypertension
45: 203-208
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sowers, J. R., White, W. B., Pitt, B., Whelton, A., Simon, L. S., Winer, N., Kivitz, A., van Ingen, H., Brabant, T., Fort, J. G., for the Celecoxib Rofecoxib Efficacy and Safety in,
(2005). The Effects of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Therapy on 24-Hour Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension, Osteoarthritis, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Arch Intern Med
165: 161-168
[Abstract][Full Text]
de Paula Santos, U., Braga, A. L. F., Giorgi, D. M. A., Pereira, L. A. A., Grupi, C. J., Lin, C. A., Bussacos, M. A., Zanetta, D. M. T., do Nascimento Saldiva, P. H., Filho, M. T.
(2005). Effects of air pollution on blood pressure and heart rate variability: a panel study of vehicular traffic controllers in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Eur Heart J
26: 193-200
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, M. N., Jones, D. W., Kurtz, T., Sheps, S. G., Roccella, E. J.
(2005). Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension
45: 142-161
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bonow, R. O.
(2004). Update in Cardiology. ANN INTERN MED
141: 628-634
[Full Text]
Appel, L. J.
(2004). Beyond (or Back to) Traditional Risk Factors: Preventing Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. ANN INTERN MED
140: 60-61
[Full Text]
Wilmer, W. A., Rovin, B. H., Hebert, C. J., Rao, S. V., Kumor, K., Hebert, L. A.
(2003). Management of Glomerular Proteinuria: A Commentary. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
14: 3217-3232
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chobanian, A. V., Bakris, G. L., Black, H. R., Cushman, W. C., Green, L. A., Izzo, J. L. Jr, Jones, D. W., Materson, B. J., Oparil, S., Wright, J. T. Jr, Roccella, E. J., the National High Blood Pressure Education Program,
(2003). Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension
42: 1206-1252
[Abstract][Full Text]
Malik, I.
(2003). JournalScan. Heart
89: 1119-1120
[Full Text]
(2003). Ambulatory BP Adds Prognostic Value in Treated Hypertensive Patients. Journal Watch Cardiology
2003: 2-2
[Full Text]
(2003). Prognostic Value of 24-Hour Ambulatory BP. JWatch General
2003: 1-1
[Full Text]