The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 349:1481-1482 October 9, 2003 Number 15
NextNext

Stem Cells

 

This Article
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Drazen, J. M.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Regarding your editorial in the July 17 issue,1 I would like to extend my compliments and appreciation to you and your editorial staff for making the publication of stem-cell research a priority. My mother has been fighting Parkinson's disease for almost 30 years, and although upcoming research may do little, if anything, to help her at this point, it has lifted the spirits of our family tremendously to know that promising research will get the attention it deserves and will perhaps help others.


Lisa J. Allen, J.D.
197 Eighth St.
Charlestown, MA 02129
inbox{at}lisaallen.com

References

  1. Drazen JM. Legislative myopia on stem cells. N Engl J Med 2003;349:300-300. [Free Full Text]

 
To the Editor: You accuse the U.S. House of Representatives of "legislative myopia" in their vote to ban research on medical treatments derived from embryonic stem cells. It might be, instead, that many legislators and the people they represent are being prudent and thoughtful in arriving at their assessment that this research should be banned. Both reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning produce a human embryo. Even at this single-cell stage, the human embryo has a human genetic code and is a living human being. The therapeutic clone is then destroyed so that its stem cells may be harvested for research.

The opposition to therapeutic cloning is not a legislative gaffe but the result of a deeply held belief in the personhood of the human embryo and the intrinsic value of every being of human origin. The goal of finding treatments for conditions that are incurable is a worthy one, but not if the means to achieving this goal is the production, and then the destruction, of human embryos. I hope the editors of the Journal will accept moral views contrary to their own.


Sharon Gerardi, D.O.
2561 Pico Ave.
Clovis, CA 93611


 
Dr. Drazen replies: The letters we have received about somatic-cell nuclear transfer exemplify the differing opinions about the ethical aspects of this procedure. There is no one answer that will satisfy everyone. Our position is that the use of somatic-cell nuclear transfer to create embryonic stem cells for therapeutic purposes is ethically justifiable. Thus, the editors plan to judge research using this form of technology, as we do all research, on the basis of its quality and its ability to relieve human suffering. Patients with serious degenerative conditions are eagerly waiting for progress; when true progress is made, we will report it.


Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D.


 

This Article
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Drazen, J. M.
-PubMed Citation


HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.