A Factorial Trial of Six Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Christian C. Apfel, M.D., Kari Korttila, F.R.C.A., Ph.D., Mona Abdalla, Ph.D., Heinz Kerger, M.D., Alparslan Turan, M.D., Ina Vedder, M.D., Carmen Zernak, M.D., Klaus Danner, M.D., Ritva Jokela, M.D., Ph.D., Stuart J. Pocock, Ph.D., Stefan Trenkler, M.D., Markus Kredel, M.D., Andreas Biedler, M.D., Daniel I. Sessler, M.D., Norbert Roewer, M.D., for the IMPACT Investigators
Background Untreated, one third of patients who undergo surgerywill have postoperative nausea and vomiting. Although many trialshave been conducted, the relative benefits of prophylactic antiemeticinterventions given alone or in combination remain unknown.
Methods We enrolled 5199 patients at high risk for postoperativenausea and vomiting in a randomized, controlled trial of factorialdesign that was powered to evaluate interactions among as manyas three antiemetic interventions. Of these patients, 4123 wererandomly assigned to 1 of 64 possible combinations of six prophylacticinterventions: 4 mg of ondansetron or no ondansetron; 4 mg ofdexamethasone or no dexamethasone; 1.25 mg of droperidol orno droperidol; propofol or a volatile anesthetic; nitrogen ornitrous oxide; and remifentanil or fentanyl. The remaining patientswere randomly assigned with respect to the first four interventions.The primary outcome was nausea and vomiting within 24 hoursafter surgery, which was evaluated blindly.
Conclusions Because antiemetic interventions are similarly effectiveand act independently, the safest or least expensive shouldbe used first. Prophylaxis is rarely warranted in low-risk patients,moderate-risk patients may benefit from a single intervention,and multiple interventions should be reserved for high-riskpatients.
Anesthesia is given to more than 75 million surgical patientsannually, worldwide. Untreated, one third will have postoperativenausea, vomiting, or both.1,2,3 Patients often rate postoperativenausea and vomiting as worse than postoperative pain.4,5 Itis not surprising, therefore, that prevention of postoperativenausea and vomiting improves satisfaction among patients whoare likely to experience them.6 Vomiting increases the riskof aspiration and has been associated with suture dehiscence,esophageal rupture, subcutaneous emphysema, and bilateral pneumothoraxes.7,8Postoperative nausea and vomiting frequently delay dischargefrom postanesthesia care units, and they are the leading causeof unexpected hospital admission after planned ambulatory surgery.9The annual cost of postoperative nausea and vomiting in theUnited States is thought to be several hundred million dollars.10,11
More than 1000 randomized, controlled trials have evaluatedpharmacologic methods of preventing and treating postoperativenausea and vomiting. Most have compared a single interventionwith placebo. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine type 3) antagonists(e.g., ondansetron), dexamethasone (a corticosteroid), and droperidol(a neuroleptic drug) are among the best-studied antiemetic agents.Alternatively, the avoidance of emetogenic factors during anesthesiacan reduce the baseline risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting.This strategy includes the use of propofol instead of volatileanesthetics, the substitution of nitrogen for nitrous oxide,and the use of remifentanil, an ultrashort-acting opioid,instead of fentanyl.12,13
The limited efficacy of treatment with single antiemetics14has prompted evaluations of several antiemetic strategies usedin combination.15 However, no previous study of postoperativenausea and vomiting has had an appropriate design or sufficientpower to evaluate all the major pharmacologic interventionssimultaneously or to determine the extent to which combiningmultiple interventions improves outcome. A recent consensusconference was thus unable to support a definitive statementon the benefits of combining antiemetic strategies.16 We thereforeconducted a large clinical trial of factorial design with sufficientpower to compare the efficacy of six well-established antiemeticstrategies and to determine the extent to which efficacy couldbe improved by combining two or three interventions.
Methods
The design of the study, the recruitment of patients at eachcenter, the acquisition and management of data, the statisticalanalyses, the interpretation of the data, and the writing andediting of the manuscript were performed independently of thesponsors. The contributions of the individual authors are listedin the Appendix.
After obtaining approval from the institutional review boardsof the 28 participating centers, we enrolled 5199 adults whowere scheduled to undergo elective surgery during general anesthesiathat was expected to last at least one hour. All the patientshad a risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting that exceeded40 percent, according to a simplified risk score,17 based onthe presence of at least two of the following risk factors:female sex, nonsmoker status, previous history of postoperativenausea and vomiting or motion sickness, and anticipated useof postoperative opioids.18,19 We excluded patients in whomany of the study drugs were contraindicated, those who had takenemetogenic or antiemetic drugs within the 24 hours before surgery,those who were expected to require postoperative mechanicalventilation, and those who were pregnant or lactating. All thepatients provided their written informed consent.
Protocol
The antiemetic efficacy of six individual treatments and combinationsof them was simultaneously evaluated according to a 26 factorialdesign.20 Three of the prophylactic interventions involved theuse of an antiemetic drug: ondansetron, dexamethasone, or droperidol.The other three interventions consisted of the use of propofolinstead of a volatile anesthetic, the omission of nitrous oxide,and the substitution of remifentanil for fentanyl. Thus, accordingto the study design, each patient was to be randomly assignedto one of each of the following six interventions: ondansetron(4 mg intravenously) or no ondansetron; dexamethasone (4 mgintravenously) or no dexamethasone; droperidol (1.25 mg intravenously)or no droperidol; propofol or a volatile anesthetic (i.e., isoflurane,desflurane, or sevoflurane) in a 2:1 ratio; nitrogen or nitrousoxide; and remifentanil or fentanyl.
These 6 treatments lead to a possible 64 (i.e., 26) differenttreatment combinations. However, propofol is associated witha reduced risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting,21 so toensure sufficient power to quantify the effect of antiemeticsin the propofol subgroup, we assigned twice as many patientsto propofol as to volatile anesthetics (for a 2:1 randomizationratio). Therefore, permuted blocks of 96 (23x3x22) patientswere generated. Each center received four blocks with a uniquecomputerized randomization, stored in sequentially numbered,sealed, opaque envelopes.
The envelopes were opened after consent was obtained, just beforethe induction of general anesthesia. The anesthesiologists responsiblefor intraoperative management were not blinded to the treatment,but they were not involved in the postoperative assessment.Supplemental oxygen may22,23 or may not24,25 have an antiemeticeffect. Consequently, at three centers patients were randomlyassigned to 30 percent oxygen in nitrous oxide, 30 percent oxygenin nitrogen, or 80 percent oxygen in nitrogen, in a randomizationratio of 1:1:1. As a result, a minimum of 144 (3x48) patientswere required per block. To provide sufficient power, each centeragreed to study 288 patients, twice as many as the minimum.
The patients were given premedication with a benzodiazepine.Three minutes before the induction of anesthesia, they receivedeither a bolus of fentanyl (100 to 200 µg) or an infusionof remifentanil (0.25 µg per kilogram of body weight perminute), according to the treatment to which they had been assigned.Anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol (Disoprivanor Diprivan, AstraZeneca) at a dose of 2 to 3 mg per kilogram,and tracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium.
Normocapnic mechanical ventilation was instituted with the assignedgas combination. Anesthesia was maintained with either propofol(starting at about 80 µg per kilogram per hour) or a standardizedconcentration of a volatile anesthetic. If the heart rate orblood pressure deviated by more than 20 percent from the preoperativevalue, an intravenous bolus of fentanyl (50 to 100 µg)was given or the rate of remifentanil infusion was increasedslightly. In addition, the concentration of volatile anestheticsor the propofol infusion rate could be adjusted as clinicallyappropriate. In the designated patients, 4 mg of dexamethasone(if assigned) and 1.25 mg of droperidol (if assigned) were givenintravenously within 20 minutes after the start of anesthesia,10,26and 4 mg of ondansetron (if assigned) was given intravenouslyduring the last 20 minutes of surgery.27
Postoperatively, the patients received supplemental oxygen,and pain was ameliorated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatorymedications administered intraoperatively. The patients whohad been assigned to receive intraoperative remifentanil weregiven 50 µg of morphine per kilogram or an equivalentopioid at the end of surgery. The need for a postoperative opioidwas left to the discretion of the anesthesiologist, and thedose was adjusted according to clinical needs. Patients whorequested antiemetic therapy or who had an emetic episode weregiven 4 mg of ondansetron; if symptoms persisted, 4 mg of dexamethasoneand 1.25 mg of droperidol were added.
Measurements
Our primary outcome measure was the incidence of any nausea,emetic episodes (retching or vomiting), or both (i.e., postoperativenausea and vomiting) during the first 24 postoperative hours.After the 2nd and 24th postoperative hours, trained investigatorswho were fully blinded to the intraoperative management andrandom treatment assignments recorded the number of emetic episodesand the time each one occurred. At both these time points, patientsorally rated their worst nausea episode during the precedinginterval on an 11-point scale, where 0 represented no nauseaand 10 the most severe nausea possible.
Statistical Analysis
Different sample-size estimations were performed and indicatedthat about 5000 patients would be needed for the analysis ofinteractions involving as many as three factors, whereas thenumber of patients required for the analysis of two-factor interactionsor of single factors was considerably smaller.20 An interactionwas defined as present if the effect of two factors in combinationwas significantly different from the separate effects of eachfactor multiplied together on an odds-ratio scale.
For each of the six randomized treatments, the numbers of patientswho had postoperative nausea and vomiting were compared withthe use of chi-square tests for each main effect, and reductionsin the relative risk of nausea and vomiting were estimated.Logistic-regression analyses were used to quantify the relativeeffects of the six interventions as odds ratios and to identifypotential two- or three-factor interactions by a stepwise forward-inclusionalgorithm. This analysis was repeated to compensate for thespecified covariates (female sex, nonsmoking status, age, ahistory of postoperative nausea and vomiting or motion sickness,use of postoperative opioids, type of surgery, and study center).A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicatestatistical significance.
Results
Patients were recruited from February 2, 2000, until July 30,2002, at 28 centers; 5199 patients underwent factorial randomizationto ondansetron or no ondansetron, dexamethasone or no dexamethasone,droperidol or no droperidol, and propofol or a volatile anesthetic.Outcome data were incomplete for 38 patients, leaving 5161 patients(99 percent) for whom complete outcome data were available.One center each did not randomize with respect to carrier gas(424 patients), use of remifentanil or fentanyl (191 patients),or both of these factors (181 patients). Three centers randomlyassigned a total of 280 patients to 80 percent oxygen in nitrogen(as a third alternative to 30 percent oxygen in nitrogen orin nitrous oxide). A total of 4123 patients were thus randomlyassigned with respect to all six primary factors, and outcomedata were incomplete in 37 of them (1 patient with incompletedata was among those not randomly assigned with respect to carriergas), leaving 4086 patients (99 percent) for whom complete outcomedata could be analyzed (Figure 1).
According to the factorial design of the study, patients were simultaneously randomly assigned to several interventions. A total of 5199 patients were randomly assigned to four interventions, and data could be analyzed for 5161 patients. One center each was unable to randomize for nitrogen (424 patients), remifentanil or fentanyl (191 patients), or both of these factors (181 patients). Thus, a total of 4123 patients were randomly assigned according to the factorial design with respect to all six interventions, and data could be analyzed for 4086 patients.
Of the 5161 patients, 81.5 percent were women, 81.2 percentwere nonsmokers, 54.5 percent had a history of postoperativenausea and vomiting or motion sickness, and 78.1 percent receivedpostoperative opioids. Hernia repair was performed in 2.8 percentof the patients, cholecystectomy in 7.7 percent, hysterectomyin 16.9 percent, thyroid surgery in 5.9 percent, breast surgeryin 2.8 percent, hip replacement in 3.5 percent, knee arthroscopyin 2.2 percent, arm or hand surgery in 2.5 percent, head andneck surgery (including ophthalmic surgery) in 9.0 percent,gynecologic surgery other than hysterectomy in 28.2 percent,other bone surgery in 6.6 percent, and other types of generalsurgery in 11.7 percent. The baseline characteristics were similaramong the patients randomly assigned to each intervention; moredetailed information can be found in Table S1 of the Supplementary Appendix 1(available with the full text of this article atwww.nejm.org).
Overall, 1731 of 5161 patients (34 percent) had postoperativenausea and vomiting. This reflects the average incidence amongall 64 possible combinations of interventions, which rangedfrom 59 percent among patients who were given volatile anesthesia,nitrous oxide, fentanyl, and no antiemetics (26 of 44 of thesepatients had nausea and vomiting) to 17 percent among patientswho received propofol, nitrogen, remifentanil, ondansetron,dexamethasone, and droperidol (17 of 102 of these patients hadnausea and vomiting). Nausea occurred in 1617 patients (31 percent)and vomiting in 734 (14 percent). Among the patients who hadsymptoms, the median and mean ratings for the maximal nausealevel were 5 and 5.7, respectively, and the median and meannumbers of emetic episodes were 1 and 1.5, respectively. Accordingto bivariate analyses, each antiemetic reduced the incidenceof postoperative nausea and vomiting by about 26 percent, propofolreduced it by about 19 percent, and nitrogen reduced it by about12 percent (Table 1). The rates of hypotension, use of intraoperativevasoconstrictors, and shivering were similar with each antiemetic.Propofol was associated with less frequent use of intraoperativevasoconstrictors (15 percent) than were volatile anesthetics(20 percent, P=0.001). The use of remifentanil rather than fentanyldid not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperativenausea and vomiting, but it was associated with increased useof intraoperative vasoconstrictors (21 percent, vs. 13 percentwith fentanyl; P<0.001) and an increased incidence of shivering(6.7 percent, vs. 3.3 percent with fentanyl; P<0.001).
Table 1. Risk of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting According to Patients' Randomly Assigned Interventions.
Increasing the number of antiemetics administered reduced theincidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting from 52 percentwhen no antiemetics were used to 37 percent, 28 percent, and22 percent when one, two, and three antiemetics, respectively,were administered (Figure 2). This corresponds to a 26 percentreduction in the relative risk of nausea and vomiting for eachadditional antiemetic used (95 percent confidence interval,23 percent to 30 percent). Furthermore, there were no significantdifferences among the antiemetics (chi-square=0.01, 2 df; P=1.00)or among any pair of antiemetics (chi-square=0.42, 2 df; P=0.81).
Figure 2. Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Associated with the Various Combinations of Antiemetic Drugs.
The data shown represent outcomes in 5161 patients. Solid circles represent the average value for each number of prophylactic antiemetics, and open symbols the incidence for each antiemetic or combination of antiemetics. Ond denotes ondansetron, Dex dexamethasone, and Dro droperidol. I bars represent 95 percent confidence intervals.
The effects of the anesthetic interventions and their combinationswere explored in the 4086 patients who were randomly assignedwith respect to all six interventions. The average incidenceof postoperative nausea and vomiting was 41 percent among thosegiven a volatile anesthetic and nitrous oxide, 34 percent amongthose given a volatile anesthetic and nitrogen, 32 percent amongthose given propofol and nitrous oxide, and 29 percent amongthose given propofol and nitrogen. Figure 3 shows these incidencesbroken down according to the number of antiemetics. There wasno significant interaction between propofol and nitrogen (chi-square=0.94,2 df, by the likelihood ratio test; P=0.33). Although the typeof volatile anesthetic (isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane)was not a randomized factor, it had no significant effect onthe incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in a multivariatemodel (P=0.30). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomitingwas 31 percent among the patients who received 80 percent oxygenin nitrogen and 24 percent among those who received 30 percentoxygen in nitrogen (P=0.07).
Figure 3. Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting According to the Combinations of Anesthetic Strategies and the Number of Antiemetic Treatments Given.
The data shown represent outcomes in 4086 patients. Because assignment to remifentanil did not contribute significantly to the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, data pertaining to remifentanil are not shown. Although the graph suggests that there is an interaction between nitrogen (air) and propofol in patients who received no antiemetic agents, statistical analyses did not confirm this impression. I bars represent 95 percent confidence intervals.
Multivariate logistic analyses of data from all 5161 patientsand of data from the 4086 patients assigned with respect toall six treatments are shown in Table 2. This analysis foundno significant interactions among the treatments. When the interactionsbetween treatments and potentially confounding factors (e.g.,the type of surgery) were analyzed, only one significant interactionwas detected: an interaction between droperidol and sex (P=0.003).Droperidol significantly reduced the risk of postoperative nauseaand vomiting among women, but not among men: 910 of the 2106women who did not receive droperidol had nausea or vomiting(43 percent), as compared with 662 of the 2101 women who didreceive this agent (32 percent) (odds ratio, 0.61; 95 percentconfidence interval, 0.53 to 0.69; P<0.001), and the effectwas independent of menstrual-cycle phase or whether menopausehad occurred; in contrast, 79 of the 482 men who did not receivedroperidol had nausea or vomiting (16 percent), as comparedwith 80 of the 472 men who did receive this agent (17 percent)(odds ratio, 1.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.46;P=0.82).
Table 2. Results of Multiple Logistic-Regression Analysis and Odds Ratios for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.
The results based on analyses of data from 4086 patients remainedessentially unchanged when data from all 5161 patients wereconsidered or when potential confounders were included in thestatistical models (Table 2). Detailed results for the 4086patients in the 64 groups are given in Table S2 of the Supplementary Appendix 1.Given the finding that total intravenous anesthesiaor the use of any antiemetic independently reduced the riskof postoperative nausea and vomiting by about 26 percent, theincidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting for five differentinitial risks was calculated for as many as four interventions(Table 3).
Table 3. Estimated Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting as a Function of Baseline Risk, on the Basis of the Assumption That Each Intervention Reduces the Relative Risk by 26 Percent.
Discussion
The large enrollment and the factorial design of our trial allowedsimultaneous evaluation of the antiemetic efficacy of threeantiemetic interventions and three anesthetic interventionsand of all possible combinations of two or three interventions.All the tested antiemetics appeared to be similarly effective.Ondansetron and other 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 antagonistsare considered relatively safe, but they are more expensivethan droperidol and dexamethasone. However, low-dose droperidolcan cause dysphoria,28,29 and the Food and Drug Administrationrecently added a "black box" warning to the drug's labelingto indicate that it may be associated with torsade de pointes;however, there is little evidence that antiemetic doses triggerthis condition.30 No studies have identified complications associatedwith the antiemetic dose of dexamethasone, although even meta-analysesmay have insufficient power to detect rare complications.31The combination of low cost and apparent safety makes dexamethasoneat a dose of 4 mg an attractive first-line agent for prophylaxisagainst postoperative nausea and vomiting.
The relative risk reduction associated with each interventionwas apparently independent for a wide range of absolute risks.Thus, interventions that reduce the relative risk to a similarextent will provide the greatest absolute risk reduction inpatients most likely to have postoperative nausea and vomiting.For example, a single intervention in a patient with an 80 percentrisk of postoperative nausea and vomiting will reduce the riskto 59 percent; the absolute risk reduction is 21 percent, whichtranslates into a number needed to treat of about five to preventnausea and vomiting in one patient. Conversely, the absoluterisk reduction in a patient with a baseline risk of 10 percentis only about 3 percent; this corresponds to a number neededto treat of about 40, which would probably not justify the expenseand risk of prophylactic treatment. The efficacy of an interventionthus depends critically on patients' baseline risk.
Interestingly, there were no significant interactions amongthe antiemetic interventions, among the anesthetic interventions,or among the antiemetics and the anesthetics. The resultingrelative risk of nausea and vomiting associated with a combinationof interventions can thus be directly calculated as the productof the individual relative risks. As a consequence, the absoluterisk reduction provided by a second or third intervention isless than that provided by the initial intervention (irrespectiveof which combination is chosen). A 70 percent reduction in therelative risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting is thus thebest that can be expected, even when total intravenous anesthesiais used in combination with three antiemetics.
Because each tested antiemetic agent and the use of total intravenousanesthesia reduced the relative risk of nausea and vomitingto a similar extent, the logical sequence is to use the leastexpensive or safest intervention first. Additional interventionsthat cost more or that are associated with a greater chanceof adverse effects will further reduce the absolute risk, butto a lesser extent than will the initial intervention. Combiningprophylactic interventions therefore markedly increases costsand the likelihood of adverse effects while providing progressivelyless additional absolute benefit. Multiple interventions shouldthus generally be reserved for patients at high risk for postoperativenausea and vomiting or those in whom nausea and vomiting wouldbe especially dangerous.
In analyses based on the entire study population, droperidoldecreased the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting as muchas did the other antiemetics, but when sex was considered, nosignificant benefit was found in men. Such a finding has notbeen described in previous studies, presumably because manystudies have been restricted to women and because studies thatincluded both sexes were too small to detect the interaction.Estrogen or other hormonal factors seem unlikely to be the cause,since the effectiveness of droperidol was independent from menstrual-cyclephase and menopause (data not shown). It is possible that dopamineis a more important trigger in women than in men. It is alsopossible that the lack of efficacy of droperidol in men is simplya spurious finding resulting from multiple testing.
It is well known that the incidence of postoperative nauseaand vomiting varies considerably according to the type of surgeryconducted. However, with the exception of hysterectomy and possiblycholecystectomy, the relative risk was similar for all typesof surgery when corrected for major risk factors including sex,nonsmoking status, a history of postoperative nausea and vomiting,and the use of postoperative opioids. As a consequence, riskmodels that include the type of surgery1,32 do not provide greaterpredictive power than a simplified model.18,19 Since no interactionswere detected between the interventions and the type of surgery,it is not necessary to repeat studies of postoperative nauseaand vomiting for various types of surgery.14,33
Supported by a grant (1518 TG 72) from the Klinik für Anaesthesiologie,Julius-Maximilians Universität, Würzburg, Germany;a Helsinki University Central Hospital State Allocation grant(TYH 0324) from Helsinki University Central Hospital, Universityof Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; AstraZeneca, Wedel, Germany;GlaxoSmithKline, Hamburg, Germany; the Gheens Foundation, Louisville,Ky.; the Joseph Drown Foundation, Los Angeles; the Commonwealthof Kentucky Research Challenge Trust Fund, Louisville, Ky.;and a Health Grant (GM 061655) from the National Institutesof Health, Bethesda, Md.
Presented in part at meetings of the European Society of Anaesthesiologists,Glasgow, Scotland, June 2003; the German Society of Anesthesiologists,Munich, Germany, April 2003; and the American Society of Anesthesiologists,San Francisco, October 2003.
Dr. Apfel reports having served as a paid speaker for and havingreceived grant support from AstraZeneca (Wedel, Germany) andGlaxoSmithKline (Munich, Germany), having served as a consultantfor GlaxoSmithKline, and having served as a consultant for Merck(Whitehouse, N.Y.) and Helsinn Healthcare (Lugano, Switzerland)with respect to antiemetics unrelated to the products discussedin this article. Dr. Korttila reports having served as a consultantfor Pharmacia/Pfizer (New London, Conn.) and Helsinn Healthcareand as a paid speaker for Pharmacia/Pfizer. Dr. Apfel and Dr.Sessler report having received a grant from Pharmacia/Pfizerfor a grant-writing workshop. Dr. Sessler reports having receivedgrants from Progenics (Tarrytown, N.Y.), Cardinal Health (McGrawPark, Ill.), Pfizer (New London, Conn.), Ocean Optics (Dunedin,Fla.), and Scott Laboratories (Lubbock, Tex.) for work unrelatedto the field of antiemetic interventions.
We are indebted to Nancy L. Alsip, Ph.D., University of Louisville,for editorial assistance.
* The International Multicenter Protocol to Assess the Singleand Combined Benefits of Antiemetic Interventions in a ControlledClinical Trial of a 2x2x2x2x2x2 Factorial Design (IMPACT) Investigatorsare listed in the Appendix.
Source Information
From Julius-Maximilians Universität, Würzburg, Germany (C.C.A., M.K., N.R.); the University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky. (C.C.A., D.I.S.); Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (K.K., R.J.); the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (M.A., S.J.P.); the Universitätsklinik Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany (H.K.); Trakya University Hospital, Edirne, Turkey (A.T.); von Bodelschwingsche Anstalten Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany (I.V.); Kreiskrankenhaus Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany (C.Z.); Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany (K.D.); Reiman University Hospital, Presov, Slovakia (S.T.); and the Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany (A.B.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Apfel at Outcomes Research Institute, 501 East Broadway, Suite 210, Louisville, KY 40202, or at apfel{at}ponv.org.
References
Gan TJ. Postoperative nausea and vomiting -- can it be eliminated? JAMA 2002;287:1233-1236. [Free Full Text]
Kovac AL. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs 2000;59:213-243. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Watcha MF. Postoperative nausea and emesis. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2002;20:709-22.
Koivuranta M, Laara E, Snare L, Alahuhta S. A survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia 1997;52:443-449. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999;89:652-658. [Free Full Text]
Darkow T, Gora-Harper ML, Goulson DT, Record KE. Impact of antiemetic selection on postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient satisfaction. Pharmacotherapy 2001;21:540-548. [Medline]
Schumann R, Polaner DM. Massive subcutaneous emphysema and sudden airway compromise after postoperative vomiting. Anesth Analg 1999;89:796-797. [Free Full Text]
Bremner WG, Kumar CM. Delayed surgical emphysema, pneumomediastinum and bilateral pneumothoraces after postoperative vomiting. Br J Anaesth 1993;71:296-297. [Free Full Text]
Gold BS, Kitz DS, Lecky JH, Neuhaus JM. Unanticipated admission to the hospital following ambulatory surgery. JAMA 1989;262:3008-3010. [Abstract]
Hill RP, Lubarsky DA, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ondansetron, droperidol, or placebo. Anesthesiology 2000;92:958-967. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Watcha MF. The cost-effective management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 2000;92:931-933. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Apfel CC, Kranke P, Katz MH, et al. Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause for early but not delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized controlled trial of factorial design. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:659-668. [Free Full Text]
Divatia JV, Vaidya JS, Badwe RA, Hawaldar RW. Omission of nitrous oxide during anesthesia reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 1996;85:1055-1062. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Tramer MR. A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. I. Efficacy and harm of antiemetic interventions, and methodological issues. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45:4-13. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Scuderi PE, James RL, Harris L, Mims GR III. Multimodal antiemetic management prevents early postoperative vomiting after outpatient laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1408-1414. [Free Full Text]
Gan TJ, Meyer T, Apfel CC, et al. Consensus guidelines for management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2003;97:62-71. [Free Full Text]
Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999;91:693-700. [ISI][Medline]
Pierre S, Benais H, Pouymayou J. Apfel's simplified score may favourably predict the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:237-242. [Free Full Text]
Apfel CC, Kranke P, Eberhart LHJ, Roos A, Roewer N. Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:234-240. [Free Full Text]
Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, et al. An international multicenter protocol to assess the single and combined benefits of antiemetic interventions in a controlled clinical trial of a 2x2x2x2x2x2 factorial design (IMPACT). Control Clin Trials 2003;24:736-751. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sneyd JR, Carr A, Byrom WD, Bilski AJ. A meta-analysis of nausea and vomiting following maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol or inhalational agents. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998;15:433-445. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Greif R, Laciny S, Rapf B, Hickle RS, Sessler DI. Supplemental oxygen reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 1999;91:1246-1252. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Goll V, Akca O, Greif R, et al. Ondansetron is no more effective than supplemental intraoperative oxygen for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2001;92:112-117. [Free Full Text]
Purhonen S, Turunen M, Ruohoaho U-M, Niskanen M, Hynynen M. Supplemental oxygen does not reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 2003;96:91-96. [Free Full Text]
Joris JL, Poth NJ, Djamadar AM, et al. Supplemental oxygen does not reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy. Br J Anaesth 2003;91:857-861. [Free Full Text]
Liu K, Hsu CC, Chia YY. The effect of dose of dexamethasone for antiemesis after major gynecological surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1316-1318. [Free Full Text]
Tang J, Wang B, White PF, Watcha MF, Qi J, Wender RH. The effect of timing of ondansetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit as a prophylactic antiemetic in the ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg 1998;86:274-282. [Abstract]
Melnick B, Sawyer R, Karambelkar D, Phitayakorn P, Uy NT, Patel R. Delayed side effects of droperidol after ambulatory general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1989;69:748-751. [Free Full Text]
Lim BS, Pavy TJ, Lumsden G. The antiemetic and dysphoric effects of droperidol in the day surgery patient. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999;27:371-374. [ISI][Medline]
Gan TJ, White PF, Scuderi PE, Watcha MF, Kovac A. FDA "black box" warning regarding use of droperidol for postoperative nausea and vomiting: is it justified? Anesthesiology 2002;97:287-287. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Henzi I, Walder B, Tramer MR. Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 2000;90:186-194. [Free Full Text]
Sinclair DR, Chung F, Mezei G. Can postoperative nausea and vomiting be predicted? Anesthesiology 1999;91:109-118. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Apfel CC, Roewer N, Korttila K. How to study postoperative nausea and vomiting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:921-928. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Wang JJ, Ho ST, Tzeng JI, Tang CS. The effect of timing of dexamethasone administration on its efficacy as a prophylactic antiemetic for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2000;91:136-139. [Free Full Text]
Kovac AL, O'Connor TA, Pearman MH, et al. Efficacy of repeat intravenous dosing of ondansetron in controlling postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. J Clin Anesth 1999;11:453-459. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Appendix
The IMPACT investigators are as follows: Steering Committee C.C. Apfel (Outcomes Research Institute and Departmentof Anesthesiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky.,and the Klinik und Poliklinik für Anaesthesiologie, UniversitätWürzburg, Würzburg, Germany); K. Korttila (Departmentof Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Helsinki,Helsinki, Finland); and A. Biedler (Klinik für Anästhesiologieund Intensivmedizin, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes,Homburg, Germany). Data Management and Monitoring C.C.Apfel, E. Kaufmann, M. Kredel, A. Schmelzer, and J. Wermelt(Klinik und Poliklinik für Anaesthesiologie, UniversitätWürzburg, Würzburg, Germany); and G. Link (DatabaseEngineering, Rimpar, Germany). Manuscript Preparation and DataAnalyses C.C. Apfel (Outcomes Research Institute andDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Louisville, Louisville,Ky., and the Klinik und Poliklinik für Anaesthesiologie,Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany); D.I.Sessler (Outcomes Research Institute and Departments of Anesthesiologyand Pharmacology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky.);S.J. Pocock and M. Abdalla (Statistics Unit, London School ofHygiene and Tropical Medicine, London). Site Investigators A. Turan (Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, TrakyaUniversity, Edirne, Turkey); E. Kaufmann, P. Kranke, M. Kredel,N. Roewer, A. Schmelzer, and J. Wermelt (Klinik und Poliklinikfür Anästhesiologie, Julius-Maximilians Universität,Würzburg, Germany); R.M. Jokela, A. Soikkeli, and K. Korttila(Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Helsinki UniversityCentral Hospital, Helsinki, Finland); C. Isselhorst, B. Fritz,and H. Kerger (Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin,Universitätsklinik Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany); O. Danzeisen,C. Heringhaus, I. Schramm, and S. Spieth (Department of Anesthesiology,Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany); L. Eberhart andK. Werthwein (Department of Anesthesiology, UniversitätUlm, Ulm, Germany); W. Leidinger, J.N. Meierhofer, U. Ruppert,and C. Zernak (Abteilung für Anästhesiologie, OperativeIntensivmedizin, und Blutprodukte, Kreiskrankenhaus Garmisch-Partenkirchen,Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany); A. Bacher (Klinik fürAnästhesie und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin, UniversitätWien, Vienna); H. Bartsch and H. Forst (Department of Anesthesiologyand Surgical Intensive Care, Zentralklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg,Germany); B. Book, W. Hoeltermann, and C. Prause (Departmentof Anesthesiology, Klinikum Lingen, Lingen, Germany); E. Palencikovaand S. Trenkler (Department of Anesthesiology, Reiman UniversityHospital, Presov, Slovakia); H. Bause, H. Bordon, and K. Stoecklein(Department of Anesthesiology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Altona,Hamburg-Altona, Germany); F. Bach, D. Buschmann, F. Mertzlufft,and I. Vedder (Klinik für Anästhesiologie und OperativeIntensivmedizin, von Bodelschwingsche Anstalten Bethel, Bielefeld,Germany); C. Frenkel and A. Paura (Department of Anesthesiology,Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany); K. Danner,C. Madler, and B. Steinbrecher (Institut für Anästhesiologieund Notfallmedizin, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany);A. Kimmich, E. Schneider, and M. Trick (Department of Anesthesiology,Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany);A. Biedler, D. Detzel, and W. Wilhelm (Klinik für Anästhesiologieund Intensivmedizin, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes,Homburg, Germany); M. Koivuranta (Department of Anesthesiology,Central Lapland Hospital, Rovaniemi, Finland); M. Hinojosa,M. Lucas, S. Muñoz, R. Rincon, and P. Vila (Departmentof Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol,Badalona, Barcelona, Spain); M. Hergert and F. Liebenow (Departmentof Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Schwerin, Schwerin,Germany); H.-B. Hopf and S. Pohl (Department of Anesthesiology,Kreisklinik Langen, Langen, Germany); G. Frings (AnesthesiologyUnit, Wedau-Kliniken, Duisburg); G. Fritz and C. Hoehne (Departmentof Anesthesiology, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum,Berlin); H. Feierfeil and J. Motsch (Department of Anesthesiology,Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany); A. Goebel(Department of Anesthesiology, Eichhof Krankenhaus, Lauterbach,Germany); S. Alahuhta, T. Kangas-Saarela, and P. Karjaleinen(Department of Anesthesiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu,Finland); R. Sneyd (Department of Anaesthetics, Derriford Hospital,Plymouth, United Kingdom); and U. Koschel and M. Lange (Departmentof Anesthesiology, Waldkrankenhaus Rudolf Elle, Eisenberg, Germany).
Leslie, K., Myles, P. S., Chan, M. T. V., Paech, M. J., Peyton, P., Forbes, A., McKenzie, D., the ENIGMA Trial Group,
(2008). Risk factors for severe postoperative nausea and vomiting in a randomized trial of nitrous oxide-based vs nitrous oxide-free anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth
101: 498-505
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bonnet, M.-P., Marret, E., Josserand, J., Mercier, F. J.
(2008). Effect of prophylactic 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on pruritus induced by neuraxial opioids: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth
101: 311-319
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mraovic, B., Simurina, T., Sonicki, Z., Skitarelic, N., Gan, T. J.
(2008). The Dose-Response of Nitrous Oxide in Postoperative Nausea in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Study. Anesth. Analg.
107: 818-823
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lichtor, J. L., Glass, P. S. A.
(2008). We're Tired of Waiting. Anesth. Analg.
107: 353-355
[Full Text]
Kovac, A. L., Eberhart, L., Kotarski, J., Clerici, G., Apfel, C., The Palonosetron 04-07 Study Group,
(2008). A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Doses of Palonosetron Versus Placebo in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Over a 72-Hour Period. Anesth. Analg.
107: 439-444
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wittmann, M., Schaaf, T., Peters, I., Wirz, S., Urban, B. W., Barann, M.
(2008). The Effects of Fentanyl-Like Opioids and Hydromorphone on Human 5-HT3A Receptors. Anesth. Analg.
107: 107-112
[Abstract][Full Text]
Coburn, M., Kunitz, O., Apfel, C. C., Hein, M., Fries, M., Rossaint, R.
(2008). Incidence of postoperative nausea and emetic episodes after xenon anaesthesia compared with propofol-based anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth
100: 787-791
[Abstract][Full Text]
Orhan-Sungur, M., Kranke, P., Sessler, D., Apfel, C. C.
(2008). Does Supplemental Oxygen Reduce Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth. Analg.
106: 1733-1738
[Abstract][Full Text]
Grecu, L., Bittner, E. A., Kher, J., Smith, S. E., Rosow, C. E.
(2008). Haloperidol Plus Ondansetron Versus Ondansetron Alone for Prophylaxis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth. Analg.
106: 1410-1413
[Abstract][Full Text]
Habib, A. S., Gan, T. J.
(2008). PRO: The Food and Drug Administration Black Box Warning on Droperidol Is Not Justified. Anesth. Analg.
106: 1414-1417
[Full Text]
Kapoor, R., Hola, E. T., Adamson, R. T., Mathis, A. S.
(2008). Comparison of two instruments for assessing risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm
65: 448-453
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kooij, F. O., Klok, T., Hollmann, M. W., Kal, J. E.
(2008). Decision Support Increases Guideline Adherence for Prescribing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis. Anesth. Analg.
106: 893-898
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wyllie, A. R. J., Carvalhana, V. V., Burry, L. D., Teresi, J. E.
(2008). Sufficiency of data for resuming use of low-dose droperidol. Am J Health Syst Pharm
65: 201-201
[Full Text]
Chen, C.-C., Lin, C.-S., Ko, Y.-P., Hung, Y.-C., Lao, H.-C., Hsu, Y.-W.
(2008). Premedication with Mirtazapine Reduces Preoperative Anxiety and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth. Analg.
106: 109-113
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gan, T. J., Meyer, T. A., Apfel, C. C., Chung, F., Davis, P. J., Habib, A. S., Hooper, V. D., Kovac, A. L., Kranke, P., Myles, P., Philip, B. K., Samsa, G., Sessler, D. I., Temo, J., Tramer, M. R., Vander Kolk, C., Watcha, M.
(2007). Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth. Analg.
105: 1615-1628
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hohlrieder, M., Brimacombe, J., von Goedecke, A., Keller, C.
(2007). Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airway morbidity, and analgesic requirements are lower for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth
99: 576-580
[Abstract][Full Text]
Phillips, T. W. Jr, Broussard, D. M., Sumrall, W. D. III, Hart, S. R.
(2007). Intraoperative Oxygen Administration Does Not Reduce the Incidence or Severity of Nausea or Vomiting Associated with Neuraxial Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. Anesth. Analg.
105: 1113-1117
[Abstract][Full Text]
Diemunsch, P., Gan, T. J., Philip, B. K., Girao, M. J., Eberhart, L., Irwin, M. G., Pueyo, J., Chelly, J. E., Carides, A. D., Reiss, T., Evans, J. K., Lawson, F. C., for the Aprepitant-PONV Protocol 091 International,
(2007). Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth
99: 202-211
[Abstract][Full Text]
Artukoglu, F., Asenjo, J. F.
(2007). 43631 - SINGLE DOSE DEXAMETHASONE INDUCED POSTOPERATIVE PSYCHOSIS: CASE REPORT or SERIES. Canadian J. Anesthesia
54: 43631-43631
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dinsmore, J.
(2007). Anaesthesia for elective neurosurgery. Br J Anaesth
99: 68-74
[Abstract][Full Text]
Thibault, M., Girard, F., Moumdjian, R., Chouinard, P., Boudreault, D., Ruel, M.
(2007). Craniotomy site influences postoperative pain following neurosurgical procedures: a retrospective study: [Le site de craniotomie influence la douleur postoperatoire suite aux procedures neurochirurgicales : une etude retrospective]. Canadian J. Anesthesia
54: 544-548
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jackson, C. W., Sheehan, A. H., Reddan, J. G.
(2007). Evidence-based review of the black-box warning for droperidol. Am J Health Syst Pharm
64: 1174-1186
[Abstract][Full Text]
White, P. F., Kehlet, H., Neal, J. M., Schricker, T., Carr, D. B., Carli, F., the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group,
(2007). The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care. Anesth. Analg.
104: 1380-1396
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kim, M. S., Cote, C. J., Cristoloveanu, C., Roth, A. G., Vornov, P., Jennings, M. A., Maddalozzo, J. P., Sullivan, C.
(2007). There Is No Dose-Escalation Response to Dexamethasone (0.0625-1.0 mg/kg) in Pediatric Tonsillectomy or Adenotonsillectomy Patients for Preventing Vomiting, Reducing Pain, Shortening Time to First Liquid Intake, or the Incidence of Voice Change. Anesth. Analg.
104: 1052-1058
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gan, T. J., Apfel, C. C., Kovac, A., Philip, B. K., Singla, N., Minkowitz, H., Habib, A. S., Knighton, J., Carides, A. D., Zhang, H., Horgan, K. J., Evans, J. K., Lawson, F. C., The Aprepitant-PONV Study Group,
(2007). A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of the NK1 Antagonist, Aprepitant, Versus Ondansetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth. Analg.
104: 1082-1089
[Abstract][Full Text]
White, H., Black, R. J., Jones, M., Mar Fan, G. C.
(2007). Randomized comparison of two anti-emetic strategies in high-risk patients undergoing day-case gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth
98: 470-476
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ahonen, J., Jokela, R., Uutela, K., Huiku, M.
(2007). Surgical stress index reflects surgical stress in gynaecological laparoscopic day-case surgery. Br J Anaesth
98: 456-461
[Abstract][Full Text]
Edler, A. A., Mariano, E. R., Golianu, B., Kuan, C., Pentcheva, K.
(2007). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Postanesthesia Recovery After Pediatric Ambulatory Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy. Anesth. Analg.
104: 784-789
[Abstract][Full Text]
Paech, M. J., Rucklidge, M. W.M., Lain, J., Dodd, P. H., Bennett, E.-J., Doherty, D. A.
(2007). Ondansetron and Dexamethasone Dose Combinations for Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth. Analg.
104: 808-814
[Abstract][Full Text]
White, P. F., Kehlet, H.
(2007). Postoperative Pain Management and Patient Outcome: Time to Return to Work!. Anesth. Analg.
104: 487-489
[Full Text]
Habib, A. S., Reuveni, J., Taguchi, A., White, W. D., Gan, T. J.
(2007). A Comparison of Ondansetron with Promethazine for Treating Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Who Received Prophylaxis with Ondansetron: A Retrospective Database Analysis. Anesth. Analg.
104: 548-551
[Abstract][Full Text]
Jokela, R., Ahonen, J., Valjus, M., Seppala, T., Korttila, K.
(2007). Premedication with controlled-release oxycodone does not improve management of postoperative pain after day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth
98: 255-260
[Abstract][Full Text]
Nichols, D. G., Yaster, M.
(2007). Victims of Our Own Success or Quo Vadis Pediatric Anesthesia?. Anesth. Analg.
104: 255-257
[Full Text]
White, P. F., Tang, J., Song, D., Coleman, J. E., Wender, R. H., Ogunnaike, B., Sloninsky, A., Kapu, R., Shah, M., Webb, T.
(2007). Transdermal Scopolamine: An Alternative to Ondansetron and Droperidol for the Prevention of Postoperative and Postdischarge Emetic Symptoms. Anesth. Analg.
104: 92-96
[Abstract][Full Text]
Piper, S. N., Rohm, K. D., Boldt, J., Faust, K. L., Maleck, W. H., Kranke, P., Suttner, S. W.
(2006). Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 compared with 0.4 does not further reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth
97: 647-653
[Abstract][Full Text]
McKay, R. E., Bostrom, A., Balea, M. C., McKay, W. R.
(2006). Airway Responses During Desflurane Versus Sevoflurane Administration via a Laryngeal Mask Airway in Smokers. Anesth. Analg.
103: 1147-1154
[Abstract][Full Text]
Chan, M. T. V., Choi, K. C., Gin, T., Chui, P. T., Short, T. G., Yuen, P. M., Poon, A. H. Y., Apfel, C. C., Gan, T. J.
(2006). The Additive Interactions Between Ondansetron and Droperidol for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth. Analg.
103: 1155-1162
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tominaga, K., Nakahara, T.
(2006). The Twenty-Degree Reverse-Trendelenburg Position Decreases the Incidence and Severity of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Thyroid Surgery. Anesth. Analg.
103: 1260-1263
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sweeney, B.
(2006). Postoperative nausea and vomiting. BMJ
333: 313-314
[Full Text]
Wallenborn, J., Gelbrich, G., Bulst, D., Behrends, K., Wallenborn, H., Rohrbach, A., Krause, U., Kuhnast, T., Wiegel, M., Olthoff, D.
(2006). Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone: randomised double blind multicentre trial. BMJ
333: 324-
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gan, T. J., Coop, A., Philip, B. K.
(2006). Clinical Experience with Small-Dose Granisetron and Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth. Analg.
103: 511-511
[Full Text]
Komatsu, R., Orhan-Sungur, M., In, J., Podranski, T., Bouillon, T., Lauber, R., Rohrbach, S., Sessler, D.
(2006). Ondansetron does not reduce the shivering threshold in healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth
96: 732-737
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gan, T. J.
(2006). Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting.. Anesth. Analg.
102: 1884-1898
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kovac, A. L
(2006). Meta-Analysis of the Use of Rescue Antiemetics Following PONV Prophylactic Failure with 5-HT3 Antagonist/Dexamethasone Versus Single-Agent Therapies. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
40: 873-887
[Abstract][Full Text]
Leslie, J. B, Gan, T. J
(2006). Meta-Analysis of the Safety of 5-HT3 Antagonists with Dexamethasone or Droperidol for Prevention of PONV. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
40: 856-872
[Abstract][Full Text]
White, P. F., Tang, J., Hamza, M. A., Ogunnaike, B., Lo, M., Wender, R. H., Naruse, R., Sloninsky, A., Kariger, R., Cunneen, S., Khalili, T.
(2006). The use of oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron for antiemetic prophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: the effect on emetic symptoms and quality of recovery.. Anesth. Analg.
102: 1387-1393
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hadzic, A., Kerimoglu, B., Loreio, D., Karaca, P. E., Claudio, R. E., Yufa, M., Wedderburn, R., Santos, A. C., Thys, D. M.
(2006). Paravertebral Blocks Provide Superior Same-Day Recovery over General Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair.. Anesth. Analg.
102: 1076-1081
[Abstract][Full Text]
Janicki, P. K., Schuler, H. G., Jarzembowski, T. M., Rossi, M. II
(2006). Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting with Granisetron and Dolasetron in Relation to CYP2D6 Genotype.. Anesth. Analg.
102: 1127-1133
[Abstract][Full Text]
Romundstad, L., Breivik, H., Roald, H., Skolleborg, K., Haugen, T., Narum, J., Stubhaug, A.
(2006). Methylprednisolone Reduces Pain, Emesis, and Fatigue After Breast Augmentation Surgery: A Single-Dose, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study with Methylprednisolone 125 mg, Parecoxib 40 mg, and Placebo. Anesth. Analg.
102: 418-425
[Abstract][Full Text]
Liu, S. S., Strodtbeck, W. M., Richman, J. M., Wu, C. L.
(2005). A Comparison of Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Ambulatory Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth. Analg.
101: 1634-1642
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gan, T. J., Coop, A., Philip, B. K., the Kytril Study Group,
(2005). A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Granisetron Plus Dexamethasone Versus Ondansetron Plus Dexamethasone to Prevent Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy. Anesth. Analg.
101: 1323-1329
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pirat, A., Tuncay, S. F., Torgay, A., Candan, S., Arslan, G.
(2005). Ondansetron, Orally Disintegrating Tablets Versus Intravenous Injection for Prevention of Intrathecal Morphine-Induced Nausea, Vomiting, and Pruritus in Young Males. Anesth. Analg.
101: 1330-1336
[Abstract][Full Text]
Roberts, G. W., Bekker, T. B., Carlsen, H. H., Moffatt, C. H., Slattery, P. J., McClure, A. F.
(2005). Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Are Strongly Influenced by Postoperative Opioid Use in a Dose-Related Manner. Anesth. Analg.
101: 1343-1348
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cheng, C.-R., Sessler, D. I., Apfel, C. C.
(2005). Does Neostigmine Administration Produce a Clinically Important Increase in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting?. Anesth. Analg.
101: 1349-1355
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bonnet, F., Marret, E.
(2005). Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery. Br J Anaesth
95: 52-58
[Abstract][Full Text]
Golembiewski, J., Chernin, E., Chopra, T.
(2005). Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm
62: 1247-1260
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rusch, D., Eberhart, L., Biedler, A., Dethling, J., Apfel, C. C.
(2005). Prospective application of a simplified risk score to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: [L'application prospective d'un score de risque simplifie pour prevenir les nausees et les vomissements postoperatoires]. Canadian J. Anesthesia
52: 478-484
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kuhne, J., Vanarase, M. Y., Pandit, H. G., Dodd, C. A. F., Murray, D. W., Popat, M. T., Davies, A. F.
(2005). Perioperative analgesia for knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth
94: 393-395
[Full Text]
White, P. F., Hamza, M. A., Recart, A., Coleman, J. E., Macaluso, A. R., Cox, L., Jaffer, O., Song, D., Rohrich, R.
(2005). Optimal Timing of Acustimulation for Antiemetic Prophylaxis as an Adjunct to Ondansetron in Patients Undergoing Plastic Surgery. Anesth. Analg.
100: 367-372
[Abstract][Full Text]
Sneyd, J. R.
(2004). Recent advances in intravenous anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth
93: 725-736
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yalcyn, S., Yalcyn, B., Buyukcelik, A., Hartig, F., Pechlaner, C., Apfel, C. C., Sessler, D. I.
(2004). Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. NEJM
351: 1458-1459
[Full Text]
(2004). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med.
9: e5-e5
[Full Text]
(2004). Combinations of antiemetics are better for post-operative nausea and vomiting. BMJ
329: -
[Full Text]