Background Birth before 26 weeks of gestation is associatedwith a high prevalence of neurologic and developmental disabilitiesin the infant during the first two years of life.
Methods We studied at the time of early school age childrenwho had been born at 25 or fewer completed weeks of gestationin the United Kingdom and Ireland in 1995. Each child had beenevaluated at 30 months of age. The children underwent standardizedcognitive and neurologic assessments at six years of age. Disabilitywas defined as severe (indicating dependence on caregivers),moderate, or mild according to predetermined criteria.
Conclusions Among extremely preterm children, cognitive andneurologic impairment is common at school age. A comparisonwith their classroom peers indicates a level of impairment thatis greater than is recognized with the use of standardized norms.
An increased prevalence of cognitive impairment and poorer educationalachievement has been repeatedly observed among school-age childrenof extremely low birth weight, as compared with those born atfull term.1,2,3,4 Such children were born before the wide introductionof antenatal treatment with corticosteroids and surfactants.These agents are important determinants of the increased survivalof extremely preterm infants5,6 and might be expected to improvelong-term outcomes.
In a previous report in the Journal, we described the outcomesat 30 months of age (corrected for prematurity) of a cohortof infants born at 25 or fewer completed weeks of gestationin 1995 in the United Kingdom and Ireland (the EPICure Study).7More than 60 percent of the children in the study cohort wereexposed to antenatal treatment with steroids, and 84 percentreceived surfactant.8 At 30 months of age, 24 percent of thesurvivors had severe disabilities.
The high prevalence of disability at 30 months of age made itimportant to assess this cohort further, at a later age, whenthe degree of disability can be more clearly defined and ismore likely to be predictive of problems that will continuethroughout childhood and into later life. In this report, wedescribe the outcomes among this cohort at six years of age,when the children were involved in full-time education.
Methods
Study Subjects
We identified all extremely preterm children (gestation at birth,no more than 25 weeks and 6 days) who were born in the UnitedKingdom and Ireland between March and December 1995.8,9 Of 308children known to have been alive at 30 months, all had survivedto 6 years of age; 15 of these children were living outsidethe United Kingdom or Ireland. Of the remaining 293 children,241 (82 percent) participated in this study at a median ageof six years and four months (range, five years and two monthsto seven years and three months). Of the 241 participants, 34were being educated at schools for children with special needs,3 were in a special-needs class attached to a mainstream school,and 204 were in a class in a mainstream school.
For each child in a class in a mainstream school, we soughta classmate matched for age and sex to serve as a control. Werequested that the head teacher of the class identify threechildren of the same sex and race or ethnic group as the indexchild, with birthdays close to that of the index child, andwe then selected a control at random from the three; if a childidentified by the teacher for comparison had been born preterm,a different child was selected. Race or ethnic group was assignedby the teacher on the basis of knowledge of the children andtheir families. A total of 160 children selected as comparison(control) subjects who were born at full term were evaluated.In another 44 cases, the head teachers or the parents refusedto take part in the study, in 2 cases the head teachers didnot find a suitable match to the index child, and in one casethe child was assessed outside the school, without a classmate.
All parents gave written informed consent, and the study wasapproved by the Trent Multicenter research ethics committeeand the local education authorities in Scotland. The study investigatorswere responsible for the identification of the original studycohort and the studies of children up to 2.5 years of age andagain at 6 years of age, and the developmental panel performedthe data collection.
Assessment
The 207 children in mainstream schools were evaluated by meansof a clinical examination including neuropsychological assessment.Children with disabilities in special-needs schools were evaluatedwithout the use of a comparison child by means of an appropriateassessment. The developmental panel included seven experienceddevelopmental pediatricians and eight psychologists, who receivedformal training in performing the assessments. All reached therequired level of competence (agreement of more than 80 percentwith an independent observer for videotaped tasks) before commencingthe study assessments. The assessors were unaware of the neonatalcourses of the children they evaluated and were not informedas to which children were preterm and which were the controls.
We classified the children into four functional groups of disabilityon the basis of the definitions we have used previously.10 Adisability was defined as severe if it was considered likelyto make the child highly dependent on caregivers and if it includednonambulant cerebral palsy, an IQ score more than 3 SD belowthe mean, profound sensorineural hearing loss, or blindness.A disability was defined as moderate if reasonable independencewas likely to be reached and if it included ambulant cerebralpalsy, an IQ score 2 to 3 SD below the mean, sensorineural hearingloss that was corrected with a hearing aid, and impaired visionwithout blindness. Mild disability included neurologic signswith minimal functional consequences or other impairments suchas squints or refractive errors. Cerebral palsy was classifiedindependently of the degree of disability, and the classificationwas made retrospectively, at the completion of the study, accordingto the description of functions for each limb,11 by two assessors.
When a cognitive assessment was appropriate, it was made withthe use of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC).12Among the 41 index children whose severe cognitive impairmentor disability precluded the use of this assessment tool, eitherthe Griffiths Scales of Mental Development13 (35 children) orthe neuropsychological instrument known as NEPSY14 (6 children)was used, and the results for these children were substitutedfor the missing values in the Mental Processing Composite ofK-ABC to produce an overall cognitive score. Children with ascore below 40 (the lowest score in the K-ABC) were assigneda score of 39. No other substitution of data values was madein other K-ABC scales. We measured cognitive impairment withthe use of reference groups consisting of both the publishedtest norms (based on children born in the late 1970s, for theK-ABC) and contemporary classmates, given the well-describedrise in IQ scores over time.15,16,17 Cognitive performance wasclassified as severely impaired if the score was more than 3SD below the mean, moderately impaired if it was more than 2but not more than 3 SD below the mean, and mildly impaired ifit was more than 1 but not more than 2 SD below the mean.
Statistical Analysis
Data were collected on standardized forms and encoded for computerizedanalysis with the use of SPSS for Windows software (version11). The assessment data for each child were examined beforethey were combined with the data set of the previous main studyfor analysis. Categorical outcomes were compared with use ofchi-square tests for trends, as appropriate, or Fisher's exacttest. Continuous outcomes were compared with use of independentStudent's t-tests. Differences in proportions and odds ratioswere calculated from contingency tables with the use of Instat(version 3.02, GraphPad Software). All statistical tests weretwo-sided.
Results
We had previously evaluated 283 children at 30 months of agecorrected for prematurity.7 Of the 47 children not assessedagain at six years of age, 17 (36 percent) had been classifiedas severely disabled, 12 (26 percent) had other disabilities,and 18 (38 percent) had no disability. As compared with thosewho had been assessed, these 47 children were more likely tohave young mothers (21 years of age or younger; 24 percent vs.11 percent, P<0.01). The distribution of neonatal complications,other socioeconomic factors, and outcomes at 30 months of agecorrected for prematurity was similar in the two groups. Anotherfive children who were not evaluated at 30 months were includedin the analysis. The 241 children assessed for this report wererepresentative of the whole population of survivors (308) withregard to birth weight, gestational age, and several perinatalvariables (see the Supplementary Appendix, available with thefull text of this article at www.nejm.org).
Figure 1. Cognitive Scores for 241 Extremely Preterm Children and 160 Age-Matched Classmates Who Were Full Term at Birth, According to Sex and Completed Weeks of Gestation.
The scores are Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children scores for the Mental Processing Composite or developmental scores according to the Griffiths Scales of Mental Development and NEPSY (possible range, 39 to 150); higher scores indicate better function. Bars indicate mean values. The dashed line is the mean of the standardized data (normal population).
The scores of extremely preterm children were significantlylower than those of control children in all the K-ABC subscales,and boys had consistently lower subscale scores than girls (Table 1).Among extremely preterm children, the mean scores for simultaneousprocessing were 8 points lower than those for sequential processing,and the achievement scores were significantly lower than theMental Processing Composite scores (by 10 points among boys,and 9 points among girls). In contrast, the control group hadsimilar scores across the four scales in the K-ABC.
Table 2. Neurocognitive Function and Degree of Disability at Six Years of Age among 241 Extremely Preterm Children and 160 Classmates Born at Full Term.
Neuromotor Function
Of the 241 extremely preterm children assessed, 49 (20 percent)had spastic or dyskinetic cerebral palsy and a further 9 hadabnormal neurologic signs (hypotonia), whereas none in the controlgroup had cerebral palsy or abnormal neurologic conditions.Thirty-five children (15 percent) had signs of spastic diplegia,four had hemiplegia, nine had quadriplegia, and one child haddyskinetic cerebral palsy. Of the 35 children, 15 were not walking(severe motor disability, 6 percent) and another 15 with cerebralpalsy were independently walking but with abnormal gait (moderatemotor disability). The mean cognitive score for these 30 childrenwas 49±17. The remaining 19 children with cerebral palsyhad no evidence of clinically important functional difficultiesrelating to gait or hand use identified in the assessment; anda mean cognitive score of 81±19.
Twelve children with diplegia (34 percent) had mild motor disability,as compared with only 7 percent of children with other typesof cerebral palsy. Cerebral palsy was more common among boysthan girls (26 percent vs. 14 percent; odds ratio for the riskof cerebral palsy, 2.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1to 4.1), as was cerebral palsy with disability (odds ratio,2.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 5.4).
Sensory Morbidity
Four children were blind, and two could see only light (severedisability, 2 percent) (Table 2); five of these children hadreceived treatment for retinopathy of prematurity. Many childrenhad other, less severe visual impairments: squint was presentin 58 (24 percent), and 58 (24 percent) wore eyeglasses, ascompared with 1 control child with a squint and 6 with refractiveerrors. Seven children had profound hearing loss that couldnot be corrected with hearing aids (severe disability, 3 percent)and 17 children had lesser degrees of hearing loss, 7 of whomrequired hearing aids. In contrast, hearing impairment was presentin three control children, one of whom required a hearing aid.
Overall Classification
Two of the 160 comparison children had a moderate disability.The outcome for the extremely preterm cohort is summarized inTable 2 in each of four domains (neuromotor, cognition, hearing,and vision) and according to gestational age and sex in Table 3.These data were combined with birth information to deriveoverall outcomes at each gestational age on the basis of livebirths or admission to neonatal intensive care units (Table 4).
Table 4. Summary of Outcomes among Extremely Preterm Children.
Change in Disability Profile between Assessments
Of the 241 children in this study, 236 had also been among thegroup assessed at 30 months of age.7 Outcome at 30 months ofage corrected for prematurity was divided into three functionaloutcomes, on the basis of professional consensus10 namely,severe disability, other disabilities, and no disability. Thecriteria for severe disability used at 30 months of age werethe same as those used at 6 years of age, except that the BayleyScales of Infant Development were used to assign a value forcognitive disability without the use of a comparison or controlgroup. The category of "other disabilities" included any disabilityor impairment in the four domains that was not covered by thecategory of "severe" disability.
Figure 2 shows the relationship between the findings at 30 monthsof age and at 6 years of age for the 236 extremely preterm childrenassessed at both ages. Severe disability at 30 months was highlypredictive of outcome at 6 years (P<0.001). Of 63 childrenclassified as having severe disability at 30 months, 86 percenthad either severe or moderate disability at 6 years. The categoryof severe disability at 30 months had low sensitivity (50 percent)for moderate or severe disability at 6 years but good specificity(93 percent). Thirty-eight percent of children classified ashaving "other disabilities" and 24 percent of those categorizedas having "no disability" at 30 months had moderate or severedisability at the assessment at 6 years of age.
As compared with the normative data used to standardize theK-ABC, which may be considered to be equivalent to "historicalcontrols" from the late 1970s, the data on this group of childrenshowed that they do not seem to be faring much worse than hasbeen reported previously for extremely preterm or extremely-low-birth-weightchildren at a similar age1,17,18: 21 percent had scores morethan 2 SD below the mean (Table 2). All these studies includedmore mature infants and extremely preterm children. However,as compared with a more relevant control group of contemporaryclassmates who were born at full term, almost twice as manyextremely preterm children were found to have general cognitivedeficits (41 percent). Thus, important differences may be underestimatedif preterm children are not compared with a contemporary comparisongroup.17,19
This finding of substantial general cognitive deficit is unlikelyto be attributable to selective dropout of high achievers. Ouranalysis indicates that there was no material difference withregard to medical variables, growth, or early disability betweenthose lost to follow-up and those assessed. Rather, dropoutwas more likely to occur in families of young mothers and tobe associated with social disadvantage, which would be expectedto reduce cognitive performance17,20,21; we may therefore haveunderestimated the frequency of cognitive deficit in our population.However, our classroom controls may represent a relatively healthygroup, because only peers from mainstream schools were included.The United Kingdom and Ireland have a policy that aims at integratingchildren with special needs into mainstream education, and onlychildren with a very high degree of special-needs requirementsare educated in special schools. Thus, we would expect onlyslight overestimations of differences between extremely pretermchildren and the classmates who served as controls.
The proportion of children who were considered to have a severedisability (22 percent at 6 years of age) was similar to thatat 30 months of age. The category of severe disability thatwe used at 30 months was identified by consensus as an importantoutcome classification that was likely to imply substantialongoing disability.10 The value of this outcome classificationas a high-risk category was confirmed in the current study,because 86 percent went on to have severe or moderate disabilityat six years of age. The outcomes of children whose disabilitieswere assessed as less severe at 30 months of age appeared similarto those of children without a documented disability at thatassessment.
Twelve percent of the children assessed had cerebral palsy withmoderate or severe motor disability, but these children representonly half of those observed to have abnormal neurologic signs.Children with moderately or severely disabling cerebral palsywere also more likely to have cognitive impairment, as comparedwith children with other motor disabilities who had a similarfrequency of cognitive impairment as children without cerebralpalsy. Nonetheless, the cognitive scores of children with cerebralpalsy and mild motor disability were lower than those of theremaining children without signs of neurologic abnormalities.This finding is consistent with previous reports of the cognitivefunction of preterm children born at later gestational ages.22,23
There are few reports of outcomes at school age among childrenborn extremely preterm.26 Direct comparisons between previousreports and the present study are made difficult by the lackof consistency in the measures of outcome. In four reports spanningthe decade from 1984 through 1994, the prevalence of severedisability (variously defined) at three to five years of ageranged from 25 to 60 percent among survivors born at less than26 weeks of gestation.27,28,29,30 The numbers of children includedin these studies were small, ranging from 14 to 77. In contrast,a study conducted in Stockholm of births during the period from1990 to 1992 reported severe disability in 14 percent of three-year-oldchildren (4 of 29) born at 24 weeks or less of gestation andin 9 percent of children (14 of 148) born at 25 or 26 weeks.31None of these studies used classmates as a control group.
The rate of disability may also be dependent on the willingnessof the attending clinical staff to institute intensive careat the time of an extremely preterm birth32; comparisons acrossstudies are thus also limited by the lack of detailed informationon the liveborn population from which such information is derivedand on the delivery-room policy with regard to instituting intensivecare. The rate of moderate or severe disability that we observed 46 percent among our assessed cohort is similarto that in earlier reports from the United Kingdom, the UnitedStates, and Australia for births in 1984, 1990 through 1994,and 1991 to 1992, respectively.27,28,29,30 Furthermore, thesestudies all classified outcomes with the use of standardizationdata without correction for contemporary performance, and thereforedo not indicate any improvement in prognosis over the decadespanned by these reports. Reports of outcomes based on birthweight for children with a birth weight of 1000 g or less aremore common than studies based on gestational age,26 but studiesbased on birth weight are not directly comparable to ours, becausethey include not only extremely preterm children but also childrenof higher gestational age with intrauterine growth restriction.
The prevalence of cerebral palsy among extremely preterm childrenranged from 16 to 21 percent in four recent reports.27,28,31,33Although we report a similar prevalence (20 percent), the proportionof children with cerebral palsy and severe or moderate motordisability is lower (12 percent). We believe this differenceis clinically important, because a neurologic abnormality thatdoes not interfere with gait or with gross manipulative skillsallows the child substantial independence and a better qualityof life.
The present findings in a large cohort of children born at fewerthan 26 weeks of gestation indicate that adverse cognitive sequelaeare a more frequent outcome among such infants than among moremature preterm populations. Further analysis will be neededto determine whether the cognitive impairments may explain theeducational difficulties that have been reported for extremely-low-birth-weightchildren1 and whether specific learning difficulties, such asin language or behavioral and social areas,34 are importantadditional predictors of academic achievement. Although themajority of children born at fewer than 26 weeks of gestationhave cognitive scores within the lower normal range, close follow-upof these children is warranted with regard to their future academic1and psychological34,35 difficulties.
Supported by BLISS, the premature baby charity; the Health Foundation;and WellBeing of Women.
We are indebted to the EPICure Study Group, which includes pediatriciansin 276 maternity units in the United Kingdom and Ireland whocontributed data to the study and whose help was invaluable.
* The investigators and study coordinators are listed in the Appendix.
Source Information
From the School of Human Development, University of Nottingham, Nottingham (N.M., M.A.B.); and the Unit of Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology, Department of Community-based Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, and the Department of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield (D.W., M.S.) all in the United Kingdom. Drs. Marlow and Wolke contributed equally to this article.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Marlow at the Academic Division of Child Health, Level E East Block, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom, or at neil.marlow{at}nottingham.ac.uk.
References
Saigal S, den Ouden L, Wolke D, et al. School-age outcomes in children who were extremely low birth weight from four international population-based cohorts. Pediatrics 2003;112:943-950. [Free Full Text]
Whitfield MF, Grunau RV, Holsti L. Extremely premature (< or = 800 g) schoolchildren: multiple areas of hidden disability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;77:F85-F90. [Free Full Text]
Taylor HG, Klein N, Hack M. School-age consequences of birth weight less than 750 g: a review and update. Dev Neuropsychol 2000;17:289-321. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hack M, Flannery DJ, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Borawski E, Klein N. Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002;346:149-157. [Free Full Text]
Fanaroff AA, Poole K, Duara S, et al. Micronates: 401-500 grams: the NICHD Neonatal Research Network Experience 1996-2001. Pediatr Res 2003;54:398A-398A. abstract.
Lorenz JM, Wooliever DE, Jetton JR, Paneth N. A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:425-435. [Free Full Text]
Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2000;343:378-384. [Free Full Text]
Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson AT, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR. The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000;106:659-671. [Free Full Text]
Jacobs SE, O'Brien K, Inwood S, Kelly EN, Whyte HE. Outcome of infants 23-26 weeks' gestation pre and post surfactant. Acta Paediatr 2000;89:959-965. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Disability and perinatal care: a report of two working groups convened by the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit and the former Oxford Regional Health Authority. March 1994. Oxford, England: NPEU and ORHA, 1995.
Evans P, Alberman E, Johnson A, Mutch L. Standardisation of recording and reporting cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1987;29:272-272. [Web of Science][Medline]
Kaufman A, Kaufman N. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, 1983.
Griffiths R. The abilities of young children. Somerset, U.K.: Young and Son, 1970.
Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S. Manual for the NEPSY: a developmental neuropsychological assessment. San Antonio, Tex.: Psychological Testing Corporation, 1998.
Wolke D, Ratschinski G, Ohrt B, Riegel K. The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. Eur J Pediatr 1994;153:906-915. [Web of Science][Medline]
Flynn J. Searching for justice: the discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist 1999;54:5-20.
Wolke D, Meyer R. Cognitive status, language attainment, and prereading skills of 6-year-old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41:94-109. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJ. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2002;288:728-737. [Free Full Text]
Aylward GP, Pfeiffer SI, Wright A, Verhulst SJ. Outcome studies of low birth weight infants published in the last decade: a metaanalysis. J Pediatr 1989;115:515-520. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Laucht M, Esser G, Baving L, et al. Behavioral sequelae of perinatal insults and early family adversity at 8 years of age. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39:1229-1237. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Taylor HG, Burant CJ, Holding PA, Klein N, Hack M. Sources of variability in sequelae of very low birth weight. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn Sect C Child Neuropsychol 2002;8:163-178. [Medline]
Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Children who "outgrew" cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 1982;69:529-536. [Free Full Text]
Drillien CM. Abnormal neurologic signs in the first year of life in low-birthweight infants: possible prognostic significance. Dev Med Child Neurol 1972;14:575-584. [Web of Science][Medline]
Kraemer S. The fragile male. BMJ 2000;321:1609-1612. [Free Full Text]
Brothwood M, Wolke D, Gamsu H, Benson J, Cooper D. Prognosis of the very low birthweight baby in relation to gender. Arch Dis Child 1986;61:559-564. [Free Full Text]
Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990's. Early Hum Dev 1999;53:193-218. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Emsley HC, Wardle SP, Sims DG, Chiswick ML, D'Souza SW. Increased survival and deteriorating developmental outcome in 23 to 25 week old gestation infants, 1990-4 compared with 1984-9. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;78:F99-F104. [Free Full Text]
Piecuch RE, Leonard CH, Cooper BA, Kilpatrick SJ, Schlueter MA, Sola A. Outcome of infants born at 24-26 weeks' gestation: II. Neurodevelopmental outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:809-814. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Doyle LW. Outcome at 5 years of age of children 23 to 27 weeks' gestation: refining the prognosis. Pediatrics 2001;108:134-141. [Free Full Text]
Johnson A, Townshend P, Yudkin P, Bull D, Wilkinson AR. Functional abilities at age 4 years of children born before 29 weeks of gestation. BMJ 1993;306:1715-1718.
Finnstrom O, Gaddlin PO, Leijon I, Samuelsson S, Wadsby M. Very-low-birth-weight children at school age: academic achievement, behavior and self-esteem and relation to risk factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;14:75-84. [Medline]
Lorenz JM, Paneth N, Jetton JR, den Ouden L, Tyson JE. Comparison of management strategies for extreme prematurity in New Jersey and the Netherlands: outcomes and resource expenditure. Pediatrics 2001;108:1269-1274. [Free Full Text]
D'Angio CT, Sinkin RA, Stevens TP, et al. Longitudinal, 15-year follow-up of children born at less than 29 weeks' gestation after introduction of surfactant therapy into a region: neurologic, cognitive, and educational outcomes. Pediatrics 2002;110:1094-1102. [Free Full Text]
Hille ET, den Ouden AL, Saigal S, et al. Behavioural problems in children who weigh 1000 g or less at birth in four countries. Lancet 2001;357:1641-1643. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Botting N, Powls A, Cooke RW, Marlow N. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorders and other psychiatric outcomes in very low birthweight children at 12 years. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997;38:931-941. [Web of Science][Medline]
Appendix
The following investigators and study coordinators participatedin the EPICure Study Group: K. Costeloe (London), A.T. Gibson(Sheffield), E.M. Hennessy (London), N. Marlow (Nottingham),A.R. Wilkinson (Oxford), D. Wolke (Bristol). Developmental panel:pediatricians: M. Bracewell, M. Cruwys, R. MacGregor, L. McDonald,M. Morton, M. Morris, S. Thomas; psychologists: E. Luck, C.Bamford, H. Betteridge, H. Bruhn, S. Johnson, I. Magiati, M.Morahan; I. Tsverik; M. Samara (psychological data analysis);H. Palmer (study administrator).
Hagmann, C. F., De Vita, E., Bainbridge, A., Gunny, R., Kapetanakis, A. B., Chong, W. K., Cady, E. B., Gadian, D. G., Robertson, N. J.
(2009). T2 at MR Imaging Is an Objective Quantitative Measure of Cerebral White Matter Signal Intensity Abnormality in Preterm Infants at Term-equivalent Age. Radiology
252: 209-217
[Abstract][Full Text]
Patrianakos-Hoobler, A. I., Msall, M. E., Marks, J. D., Huo, D., Schreiber, M. D.
(2009). Risk Factors Affecting School Readiness in Premature Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Pediatrics
124: 258-267
[Abstract][Full Text]
Anjari, M., Counsell, S. J., Srinivasan, L., Allsop, J. M., Hajnal, J. V., Rutherford, M. A., Edwards, A. D.
(2009). The Association of Lung Disease With Cerebral White Matter Abnormalities in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics
124: 268-276
[Abstract][Full Text]
Luu, T. M., Vohr, B. R., Schneider, K. C., Katz, K. H., Tucker, R., Allan, W. C., Ment, L. R.
(2009). Trajectories of Receptive Language Development From 3 to 12 Years of Age for Very Preterm Children. Pediatrics
124: 333-341
[Abstract][Full Text]
Msall, M. E.
(2009). Optimizing Early Development and Understanding Trajectories of Resiliency After Extreme Prematurity. Pediatrics
124: 387-390
[Full Text]
Batton, D. G., Committee on Fetus and Newborn,
(2009). Antenatal Counseling Regarding Resuscitation at an Extremely Low Gestational Age. Pediatrics
124: 422-427
[Abstract][Full Text]
Johnson, S, Hennessy, E, Smith, R, Trikic, R, Wolke, D, Marlow, N
(2009). Academic attainment and special educational needs in extremely preterm children at 11 years of age: the EPICure study. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
94: F283-F289
[Abstract][Full Text]
Yeaney, N. K, Murdoch, E. M, Lees, C. C
(2009). The extremely premature neonate: anticipating and managing care. BMJ
338: b2325-b2325
[Full Text]
The EXPRESS Group,
(2009). One-Year Survival of Extremely Preterm Infants After Active Perinatal Care in Sweden. JAMA
301: 2225-2233
[Abstract][Full Text]
Partridge, J. C., Dickey, B. J.
(2009). Decision-making in Neonatal Intensive Care: Interventions on Behalf of Preterm Infants. NeoReviews
10: e270-e279
[Abstract][Full Text]
Delobel-Ayoub, M., Arnaud, C., White-Koning, M., Casper, C., Pierrat, V., Garel, M., Burguet, A., Roze, J.-C., Matis, J., Picaud, J.-C., Kaminski, M., Larroque, B., for the EPIPAGE Study Group,
(2009). Behavioral Problems and Cognitive Performance at 5 Years of Age After Very Preterm Birth: The EPIPAGE Study. Pediatrics
123: 1485-1492
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lam, H. S., Wong, S. P. S., Liu, F. Y. B., Wong, H. L., Fok, T. F., Ng, P. C.
(2009). Attitudes Toward Neonatal Intensive Care Treatment of Preterm Infants With a High Risk of Developing Long-term Disabilities. Pediatrics
123: 1501-1508
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kaempf, J. W., Tomlinson, M. W., Campbell, B., Ferguson, L., Stewart, V. T.
(2009). Counseling Pregnant Women Who May Deliver Extremely Premature Infants: Medical Care Guidelines, Family Choices, and Neonatal Outcomes. Pediatrics
123: 1509-1515
[Abstract][Full Text]
Partridge, J. C., Sendowski, M. D., Drey, E. A., Martinez, A. M.
(2009). Resuscitation of Likely Nonviable Newborns: Would Neonatology Practices in California Change if the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act Were Enforced?. Pediatrics
123: 1088-1094
[Abstract][Full Text]
Barclay, S.
(2009). The Shock of the Human: how the media can change the way we think about ethical dilemmas in medicine. Clin Ethics
4: 26-30
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cheong, J.L.Y., Thompson, D.K., Wang, H.X., Hunt, R.W., Anderson, P.J., Inder, T.E., Doyle, L.W.
(2009). Abnormal White Matter Signal on MR Imaging Is Related to Abnormal Tissue Microstructure. Am. J. Neuroradiol.
30: 623-628
[Abstract][Full Text]
Doyle, L. W., Saigal, S.
(2009). Long-term Outcomes of Very Preterm or Tiny Infants. NeoReviews
10: e130-e137
[Abstract][Full Text]
Itabashi, K., Horiuchi, T., Kusuda, S., Kabe, K., Itani, Y., Nakamura, T., Fujimura, M., Matsuo, M.
(2009). Mortality Rates for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Born in Japan in 2005. Pediatrics
123: 445-450
[Abstract][Full Text]
Meadow, W., Lantos, J.
(2009). Moral Reflections on Neonatal Intensive Care. Pediatrics
123: 595-597
[Full Text]
Mangham, L. J., Petrou, S., Doyle, L. W., Draper, E. S., Marlow, N.
(2009). The Cost of Preterm Birth Throughout Childhood in England and Wales. Pediatrics
123: e312-e327
[Abstract][Full Text]
Makrides, M., Gibson, R. A., McPhee, A. J., Collins, C. T., Davis, P. G., Doyle, L. W., Simmer, K., Colditz, P. B., Morris, S., Smithers, L. G., Willson, K., Ryan, P.
(2009). Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Infants Fed High-Dose Docosahexaenoic Acid: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA
301: 175-182
[Abstract][Full Text]
Franz, A. R., Pohlandt, F., Bode, H., Mihatsch, W. A., Sander, S., Kron, M., Steinmacher, J.
(2009). Intrauterine, Early Neonatal, and Postdischarge Growth and Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 5.4 Years in Extremely Preterm Infants After Intensive Neonatal Nutritional Support. Pediatrics
123: e101-e109
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wilkinson, A. R, Ahluwalia, J., Cole, A., Crawford, D., Fyle, J., Gordon, A., Moorcraft, J., Pollard, T., Roberts, T.
(2009). Management of babies born extremely preterm at less than 26 weeks of gestation: a framework for clinical practice at the time of birth. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
94: 2-5
[Full Text]
Counsell, S. J., Edwards, A. D., Chew, A. T. M., Anjari, M., Dyet, L. E., Srinivasan, L., Boardman, J. P., Allsop, J. M., Hajnal, J. V., Rutherford, M. A., Cowan, F. M.
(2008). Specific relations between neurodevelopmental abilities and white matter microstructure in children born preterm. Brain
131: 3201-3208
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ricci, D., Cesarini, L., Romeo, D. M.M., Gallini, F., Serrao, F., Groppo, M., De Carli, A., Cota, F., Lepore, D., Molle, F., Ratiglia, R., De Carolis, M. P., Mosca, F., Romagnoli, C., Guzzetta, F., Cowan, F., Ramenghi, L. A., Mercuri, E.
(2008). Visual Function at 35 and 40 Weeks' Postmenstrual Age in Low-Risk Preterm Infants. Pediatrics
122: e1193-e1198
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hennessy, E M, Bracewell, M A, Wood, N, Wolke, D, Costeloe, K., Gibson, A, Marlow, N, for the EPICure Study Group,
(2008). Respiratory health in pre-school and school age children following extremely preterm birth. Arch. Dis. Child.
93: 1037-1043
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bodeau-Livinec, F., Marlow, N., Ancel, P.-Y., Kurinczuk, J. J., Costeloe, K., Kaminski, M.
(2008). Impact of Intensive Care Practices on Short-Term and Long-term Outcomes for Extremely Preterm Infants: Comparison Between the British Isles and France. Pediatrics
122: e1014-e1021
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pignotti, M. S
(2008). Extremely preterm births: recommendations for treatment in European countries. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
93: F403-F406
[Full Text]
Morgen, C. S., Bjork, C., Andersen, P. K., Mortensen, L. H., Nybo Andersen, A.-M.
(2008). Socioeconomic position and the risk of preterm birth--a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Int J Epidemiol
37: 1109-1120
[Abstract][Full Text]
Verrips, E., Vogels, T., Saigal, S., Wolke, D., Meyer, R., Hoult, L., Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P.
(2008). Health-Related Quality of Life for Extremely Low Birth Weight Adolescents in Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands. Pediatrics
122: 556-561
[Abstract][Full Text]
Samara, M., Marlow, N., Wolke, D., for the EPICure Study Group,
(2008). Pervasive Behavior Problems at 6 Years of Age in a Total-Population Sample of Children Born at <=25 Weeks of Gestation. Pediatrics
122: 562-573
[Abstract][Full Text]
Quine, D, Stenson, B J
(2008). Does the monitoring method influence stability of oxygenation in preterm infants? A randomised crossover study of saturation versus transcutaneous monitoring. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
93: F347-F350
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fauchere, J.-C., Dame, C., Vonthein, R., Koller, B., Arri, S., Wolf, M., Bucher, H. U.
(2008). An Approach to Using Recombinant Erythropoietin for Neuroprotection in Very Preterm Infants. Pediatrics
122: 375-382
[Abstract][Full Text]
Moster, D., Lie, R. T., Markestad, T.
(2008). Long-Term Medical and Social Consequences of Preterm Birth. NEJM
359: 262-273
[Abstract][Full Text]
Walker, S. M.
(2008). Pain in children: recent advances and ongoing challenges. Br J Anaesth
101: 101-110
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mercurio, M. R., Peterec, S. M., Weeks, B.
(2008). Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, Extreme Prematurity, Comfort Care Only, and the Principle of Justice. Pediatrics
122: 186-189
[Full Text]
Atkinson, J, Braddick, O, Anker, S, Nardini, M, Birtles, D, Rutherford, M A, Mercuri, E, Dyet, L E, Edwards, A D, Cowan, F M
(2008). Cortical vision, MRI and developmental outcome in preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
93: F292-F297
[Abstract][Full Text]
Cheong, J. L. Y., Hunt, R. W., Anderson, P. J., Howard, K., Thompson, D. K., Wang, H. X., Bear, M. J., Inder, T. E., Doyle, L. W.
(2008). Head Growth in Preterm Infants: Correlation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Neurodevelopmental Outcome. Pediatrics
121: e1534-e1540
[Abstract][Full Text]
Field, D. J, Dorling, J. S, Manktelow, B. N, Draper, E. S
(2008). Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort study of 1994-9 compared with 2000-5. BMJ
336: 1221-1223
[Abstract][Full Text]
Samaan, M C, Cuttini, M, Casotto, V, Ryan, C A
(2008). Doctors' and nurses' attitudes towards neonatal ethical decision making in Ireland. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
93: F217-F221
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bracewell, M A, Hennessy, E M, Wolke, D, Marlow, N
(2008). The EPICure study: growth and blood pressure at 6 years of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
93: F108-F114
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bassi, L., Ricci, D., Volzone, A., Allsop, J. M., Srinivasan, L., Pai, A., Ribes, C., Ramenghi, L. A., Mercuri, E., Mosca, F., Edwards, A. D., Cowan, F. M., Rutherford, M. A., Counsell, S. J.
(2008). Probabilistic diffusion tractography of the optic radiations and visual function in preterm infants at term equivalent age. Brain
131: 573-582
[Abstract][Full Text]
Pignotti, M. S., Donzelli, G.
(2008). Perinatal Care at the Threshold of Viability: An International Comparison of Practical Guidelines for the Treatment of Extremely Preterm Births. Pediatrics
121: e193-e198
[Abstract][Full Text]
Marlow, N., Hennessy, E. M., Bracewell, M. A., Wolke, D., for the EPICure Study Group,
(2007). Motor and Executive Function at 6 Years of Age After Extremely Preterm Birth. Pediatrics
120: 793-804
[Abstract][Full Text]
Holzman, C., Lin, X., Senagore, P., Chung, H.
(2007). Histologic Chorioamnionitis and Preterm Delivery. Am J Epidemiol
166: 786-794
[Abstract][Full Text]
Steinmacher, J., Pohlandt, F., Bode, H., Sander, S., Kron, M., Franz, A. R.
(2007). Randomized Trial of Early Versus Late Enteral Iron Supplementation in Infants With a Birth Weight of Less Than 1301 Grams: Neurocognitive Development at 5.3 Years' Corrected Age. Pediatrics
120: 538-546
[Abstract][Full Text]
Limperopoulos, C., Bassan, H., Gauvreau, K., Robertson, R. L. Jr, Sullivan, N. R., Benson, C. B., Avery, L., Stewart, J., MD, J. S. S., Ringer, S. A., Volpe, J. J., duPlessis, A. J.
(2007). Does Cerebellar Injury in Premature Infants Contribute to the High Prevalence of Long-term Cognitive, Learning, and Behavioral Disability in Survivors?. Pediatrics
120: 584-593
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hille, E. T. M., Weisglas-Kuperus, N., van Goudoever, J. B., Jacobusse, G. W., Ens-Dokkum, M. H., de Groot, L., Wit, J. M., Geven, W. B., Kok, J. H., de Kleine, M. J. K., Kollee, L. A. A., Mulder, A. L. M., van Straaten, H. L. M., de Vries, L. S., van Weissenbruch, M. M., Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P., for the Dutch Collaborative POPS 19 Study Group,
(2007). Functional Outcomes and Participation in Young Adulthood for Very Preterm and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: The Dutch Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants at 19 Years of Age. Pediatrics
120: e587-e595
[Abstract][Full Text]
Fonseca, E. B., Celik, E., Parra, M., Singh, M., Nicolaides, K. H., the Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Scr,
(2007). Progesterone and the Risk of Preterm Birth among Women with a Short Cervix. NEJM
357: 462-469
[Abstract][Full Text]
Knoester, M., Vandenbroucke, J. P., Helmerhorst, F. M., van der Westerlaken, L. A.J., Walther, F. J., Veen, S., On behalf of the Leiden Artificial Reproductive Te,
(2007). Matched follow-up study of 5-8 year old ICSI-singletons: comparison of their neuromotor development to IVF and naturally conceived singletons. Hum Reprod
22: 1638-1646
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rees, C. M, Pierro, A., Eaton, S.
(2007). Neurodevelopmental outcomes of neonates with medically and surgically treated necrotizing enterocolitis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
92: F193-F198
[Abstract][Full Text]
Srinivasan, L., Dutta, R., Counsell, S. J., Allsop, J. M., Boardman, J. P., Rutherford, M. A., Edwards, A. D.
(2007). Quantification of Deep Gray Matter in Preterm Infants at Term-Equivalent Age Using Manual Volumetry of 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Images. Pediatrics
119: 759-765
[Abstract][Full Text]
Thompson, D. K., Warfield, S. K., Carlin, J. B., Pavlovic, M., Wang, H. X., Bear, M., Kean, M. J., Doyle, L. W., Egan, G. F., Inder, T. E.
(2007). Perinatal risk factors altering regional brain structure in the preterm infant. Brain
130: 667-677
[Abstract][Full Text]
Harding, D R, Humphries, S E, Whitelaw, A, Marlow, N, Montgomery, H E
(2007). Cognitive outcome and cyclo-oxygenase-2 gene (-765 G/C) variation in the preterm infant. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
92: F108-F112
[Abstract][Full Text]
Gornall, J.
(2007). Where do we draw the line?. BMJ
334: 285-289
[Full Text]
Fraser, M., Bennet, L., Helliwell, R., Wells, S., Williams, C., Gluckman, P., Gunn, A. J., Inder, T.
(2007). Regional Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathology Following Cerebral Ischemia in Preterm Fetal Sheep. Reproductive Sciences
14: 182-191
[Abstract]
Parikh, N. A., Lasky, R. E., Kennedy, K. A., Moya, F. R., Hochhauser, L., Romo, S., Tyson, J. E.
(2007). Postnatal Dexamethasone Therapy and Cerebral Tissue Volumes in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics
119: 265-272
[Abstract][Full Text]
Committee on Fetus and Newborn,
(2007). Noninitiation or Withdrawal of Intensive Care for High-Risk Newborns. Pediatrics
119: 401-403
[Abstract][Full Text]
Kaempf, J. W., Tomlinson, M.
(2007). Long-term Health Outcomes of Extremely Premature Infants. Pediatrics
119: 410-411
[Full Text]
Hirtz, D., Thurman, D. J., Gwinn-Hardy, K., Mohamed, M., Chaudhuri, A. R., Zalutsky, R.
(2007). How common are the "common" neurologic disorders?. Neurology
68: 326-337
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bennet, L., Roelfsema, V., George, S., Dean, J. M., Emerald, B. S., Gunn, A. J.
(2007). The effect of cerebral hypothermia on white and grey matter injury induced by severe hypoxia in preterm fetal sheep. J. Physiol.
578: 491-506
[Abstract][Full Text]
Wilson-Costello, D., Friedman, H., Minich, N., Siner, B., Taylor, G., Schluchter, M., Hack, M.
(2007). Improved Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in 2000-2002. Pediatrics
119: 37-45
[Abstract][Full Text]
Msall, M. E.
(2007). The Limits of Viability and the Uncertainty of Neuroprotection: Challenges in Optimizing Outcomes in Extreme Prematurity. Pediatrics
119: 158-160
[Full Text]
Romantseva, L., Msall, M. E
(2006). Advances in Understanding Cerebral Palsy Syndromes After Prematurity. NeoReviews
7: e575-e585
[Full Text]
Farooqi, A., Hagglof, B., Sedin, G., Gothefors, L., Serenius, F.
(2006). Chronic Conditions, Functional Limitations, and Special Health Care Needs in 10- to 12-Year-Old Children Born at 23 to 25 Weeks' Gestation in the 1990s: A Swedish National Prospective Follow-up Study. Pediatrics
118: e1466-e1477
[Abstract][Full Text]
Reijneveld, S A, de Kleine, M J K, van Baar, A L, Kollee, L A A, Verhaak, C M, Verhulst, F C, Verloove-Vanhorick, S P
(2006). Behavioural and emotional problems in very preterm and very low birthweight infants at age 5 years. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
91: F423-F428
[Abstract][Full Text]
Loeliger, M., Inder, T., Cain, S., Ramesh, R. C., Camm, E., Thomson, M. A., Coalson, J., Rees, S. M.
(2006). Cerebral Outcomes in a Preterm Baboon Model of Early Versus Delayed Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. Pediatrics
118: 1640-1653
[Abstract][Full Text]
Smith, G. C., Shah, I., White, I. R, Pell, J. P, Crossley, J. A, Dobbie, R.
(2006). Maternal and biochemical predictors of spontaneous preterm birth among nulliparous women: a systematic analysis in relation to the degree of prematurity. Int J Epidemiol
35: 1169-1177
[Abstract][Full Text]
Woodward, L. J., Anderson, P. J., Austin, N. C., Howard, K., Inder, T. E.
(2006). Neonatal MRI to Predict Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants.. NEJM
355: 685-694
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dammann, O., Leviton, A.
(2006). Neuroimaging and the Prediction of Outcomes in Preterm Infants.. NEJM
355: 727-729
[Full Text]
Dyet, L. E., Kennea, N., Counsell, S. J., Maalouf, E. F., Ajayi-Obe, M., Duggan, P. J., Harrison, M., Allsop, J. M., Hajnal, J., Herlihy, A. H., Edwards, B., Laroche, S., Cowan, F. M., Rutherford, M. A., Edwards, A. D.
(2006). Natural History of Brain Lesions in Extremely Preterm Infants Studied With Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging From Birth and Neurodevelopmental Assessment. Pediatrics
118: 536-548
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ballard, R. A., Truog, W. E., Cnaan, A., Martin, R. J., Ballard, P. L., Merrill, J. D., Walsh, M. C., Durand, D. J., Mayock, D. E., Eichenwald, E. C., Null, D. R., Hudak, M. L., Puri, A. R., Golombek, S. G., Courtney, S. E., Stewart, D. L., Welty, S. E., Phibbs, R. H., Hibbs, A. M., Luan, X., Wadlinger, S. R., Asselin, J. M., Coburn, C. E., the NO CLD Study Group,
(2006). Inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.. NEJM
355: 343-353
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mewes, A. U.J., Huppi, P. S., Als, H., Rybicki, F. J., Inder, T. E., McAnulty, G. B., Mulkern, R. V., Robertson, R. L., Rivkin, M. J., Warfield, S. K.
(2006). Regional Brain Development in Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Low-Risk Preterm Infants. Pediatrics
118: 23-33
[Abstract][Full Text]
Khan, N. Z., Muslima, H., Parveen, M., Bhattacharya, M., Begum, N., Chowdhury, S., Jahan, M., Darmstadt, G. L.
(2006). Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Infants in Bangladesh. Pediatrics
118: 280-289
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lofqvist, C., Engstrom, E., Sigurdsson, J., Hard, A.-L., Niklasson, A., Ewald, U., Holmstrom, G., Smith, L. E. H., Hellstrom, A.
(2006). Postnatal head growth deficit among premature infants parallels retinopathy of prematurity and insulin-like growth factor-1 deficit.. Pediatrics
117: 1930-1938
[Abstract][Full Text]
Watts, J L, Saigal, S
(2006). Outcome of extreme prematurity: as information increases so do the dilemmas.. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
91: F221-F225
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bennet, L., Roelfsema, V., Pathipati, P., Quaedackers, J. S., Gunn, A. J.
(2006). Relationship between evolving epileptiform activity and delayed loss of mitochondrial activity after asphyxia measured by near-infrared spectroscopy in preterm fetal sheep. J. Physiol.
572: 141-154
[Abstract][Full Text]
Srinivasan, L., Allsop, J., Counsell, S.J., Boardman, J.P., Edwards, A.D., Rutherford, M.
(2006). Smaller Cerebellar Volumes in Very Preterm Infants at Term-Equivalent Age are Associated with the Presence of Supratentorial Lesions. Am. J. Neuroradiol.
27: 573-579
[Abstract][Full Text]
Saigal, S., Stoskopf, B., Streiner, D., Boyle, M., Pinelli, J., Paneth, N., Goddeeris, J.
(2006). Transition of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants From Adolescence to Young Adulthood: Comparison With Normal Birth-Weight Controls. JAMA
295: 667-675
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mikkola, K., Ritari, N., Tommiska, V., Salokorpi, T., Lehtonen, L., Tammela, O., Paakkonen, L., Olsen, P., Korkman, M., Fellman, V., for the Finnish ELBW Cohort Study Group,
(2005). Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 5 Years of Age of a National Cohort of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Who Were Born in 1996-1997. Pediatrics
116: 1391-1400
[Abstract][Full Text]
Woodward, L. J., Edgin, J. O., Thompson, D., Inder, T. E.
(2005). Object working memory deficits predicted by early brain injury and development in the preterm infant. Brain
128: 2578-2587
[Abstract][Full Text]
Limperopoulos, C., Benson, C. B., Bassan, H., Disalvo, D. N., Kinnamon, D. D., Moore, M., Ringer, S. A., Volpe, J. J., du Plessis, A. J.
(2005). Cerebellar Hemorrhage in the Preterm Infant: Ultrasonographic Findings and Risk Factors. Pediatrics
116: 717-724
[Abstract][Full Text]
Aylward, G. P.
(2005). The Conundrum of Prediction. Pediatrics
116: 491-492
[Full Text]
Hack, M., Taylor, H. G., Drotar, D., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Andreias, L., Wilson-Costello, D., Klein, N.
(2005). Chronic Conditions, Functional Limitations, and Special Health Care Needs of School-aged Children Born With Extremely Low-Birth-Weight in the 1990s. JAMA
294: 318-325
[Abstract][Full Text]
Tyson, J. E., Saigal, S.
(2005). Outcomes for Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants: Disappointing News. JAMA
294: 371-373
[Full Text]
Liu, B., Hill, S. J., Khan, R. N.
(2005). Oxytocin Inhibits T-Type Calcium Current of Human Decidual Stromal Cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
90: 4191-4197
[Abstract][Full Text]
Hintz, S. R., Kendrick, D. E., Vohr, B. R., Poole, W. K., Higgins, R. D., for the National Institute of Child Health and Hum,
(2005). Changes in Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 18 to 22 Months' Corrected Age Among Infants of Less Than 25 Weeks' Gestational Age Born in 1993-1999. Pediatrics
115: 1645-1651
[Abstract][Full Text]
Weil, W. B.
(2005). Russian Roulette: Final 2. Pediatrics
115: 1451-1451
[Full Text]